| Revision as of 19:08, 11 July 2006 editVanasdale (talk | contribs)7 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:13, 14 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ] 11:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Article on a small ISP that fails ] notability wise. Google hits for ""Acquired Sight" + ISP" = 71. No 3rd press mentions either. -- <span style="border: 1px solid">]''']'''</span> 17:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | Article on a small ISP that fails ] notability wise. Google hits for ""Acquired Sight" + ISP" = 71. No 3rd press mentions either. -- <span style="border: 1px solid">]''']'''</span> 17:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', non-notable- ] 18:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', non-notable- ] 18:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | To all, I suppose this information doesn't warrant WP:CORP as much as it was going to cover the pioneering and business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001 using Acquired-Sight.com as an example. | ||
| ⚫ | Google hits a year or 2 ago would have provided more than enough chatter, however the business sold to a company who downsized it to be their 2nd income with existing customers. Their decision basically gave the appearance of ASDC being defunct. I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author | ||
| *'''Comment''' If you want to write an article on the business practices of outdoor wireless ISP's, it shouldn't be titled so. Also, such an article could not use original research. (see ]) I'm guessing that "business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001" is far too specific a topic for wikipedia. --] 22:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| To all, | |||
| ⚫ | I suppose this information doesn't warrant WP:CORP as much as it was going to cover the pioneering and business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001 using Acquired-Sight.com as an example. | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Not notable - ] 21:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | Google hits a year or 2 ago would have provided more than enough chatter, however the business sold to a company who downsized it to be their 2nd income with existing customers. | ||
| * Alright... this was posted before I read all the rules... :). This just doesn't fit in Misplaced Pages. ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:25, 12 July 2006</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
| Their decision basically gave the appearance of ASDC being defunct. | |||
| * I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you | |||
| ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author | |||
Latest revision as of 14:13, 14 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Acquired-Sight.com
Article on a small ISP that fails WP:CORP notability wise. Google hits for ""Acquired Sight" + ISP" = 71. No 3rd press mentions either. -- Netsnipe 17:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable- PresN 18:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
To all, I suppose this information doesn't warrant WP:CORP as much as it was going to cover the pioneering and business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001 using Acquired-Sight.com as an example.
Google hits a year or 2 ago would have provided more than enough chatter, however the business sold to a company who downsized it to be their 2nd income with existing customers. Their decision basically gave the appearance of ASDC being defunct. I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author
- Comment If you want to write an article on the business practices of outdoor wireless ISP's, it shouldn't be titled so. Also, such an article could not use original research. (see Misplaced Pages:No original research) I'm guessing that "business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001" is far too specific a topic for wikipedia. --Xyzzyplugh 22:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable - Richfife 21:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Alright... this was posted before I read all the rules... :). This just doesn't fit in Misplaced Pages. ~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.31.169.26 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 12 July 2006
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.