| Revision as of 19:55, 11 July 2006 editGwernol (talk | contribs)94,742 edits WP:PAIN notice← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:13, 7 December 2023 edit undoBuidhe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors136,032 edits Notification: listing of Category:Critics of Objectivism (Ayn Rand) at WP:Categories for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (194 intermediate revisions by 95 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=July 2013}} | |||
| <div id="shortcut" style="border: 1px solid #CC9; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #F1F1DE"> | |||
| ''Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.'' | |||
| </div> | |||
| ---- | |||
| == |
== Sigh == | ||
| I've blocked AOluwatoyin a couple of times. I don't quite understand what else you want here. I told you that if you wanted help, just ask me directly on my talk page. I would recommend toning down your message here. You aren't helping your cause any with it. It comes off as hostile. And reverting others comments like you say you are going to is probably going to get you blocked. Again, it doesn't help you any. --]<sup>]</sup> 02:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I sent you an email. --]<sup>]</sup> 04:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==bias== | |||
| LGagnon, I appreciate your concern with keeping wikipedia npov. However, your editing of the Ayn Rand article seems to indicate a strong negative bias. Some of your edits and concerns I agree with, despite my being an Objectivist, and therefore likely to have a favorable view of Ayn Rand. I think good criticism and controversy inforamtion shold be included. I think many of your edits though are very npov. I suggest you take a step back and think about this before proceeding.] 21:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Ethan Dawe | |||
| ==Philosopher== | |||
| What are your thoughts on "Lay Philosopher" versus "Non-Academic Philosopher?" Someone is suggesting this in regards Rand and others? ] 21:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Ethan Dawe] 21:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Btw == | |||
| Given the amount of work and attention you give to the topics of grunge and alternative rock, I thought I'd run a few ideas by you. Namely, how to improve the Alternative rock template box. Obviously there are far more subgenres than we can adequately fit into it, but what do you think should should be added to it? I've added a few in the last few weeks (Paisley Underground, noise pop), but we can still add a few more in order to give people a more well-rounded view of the genre. | |||
| Any more anything from AOluwatoyin and I am going to block him indefinitely. Honestly, the legal threats should've gotten him blocked indefinitely but someone beat me to it. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :And it looks like his comments on Jimbo's talk page were reverted. --]<sup>]</sup> 12:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I do apologize for not being up on this more. I've been hit by more yahoos than usual lately, including someone who said that they "liked me" and who turned out to be a sockpuppet. Not making excuses. But not enough hours in the day to stop everyone. :) --]<sup>]</sup> 12:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == You have got to me kidding me == | |||
| I also think we should add a few more links to the "Other topics" section. The Heavy Metal template has stuff like ] and the ]. Some ideas I have for the alternative rock template are ], ], ], and ]. If you have any other suggestions, let me know. | |||
| Look at and . Good grief. --]<sup>]</sup> 01:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Note to readers: Please be aware that the two examples accessible by the links above were not written by the same individual but by two different editors. --] 21:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| In regards to the ]: I've done what I can to fill out the 80's more fully, but I do agree that the 90's probably needs some trimming, or at least a reassessment of which albums and events to include. And personally I think the "last album" bit attached to some albums is unnecessary, as many bands are listed as breaking up immediately afterwards anyways. | |||
| :It's a moot point since you admitted on my user page that you are the same person who added to the box first posted by wolfstar. As we say in Wisconsin, it's the same difference. --]<sup>]</sup> 05:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| OK, A writes a piece about C the contents of which C insists are libellous. B indicates only that the piece ought to have been published because it speaks the truth. Is B guilty of libel? Of course not, he didn't write the piece in the first place. A murders C. B testifies that C was a bastard and "deserved it". Did B murder C? Of Course not. Are you starting to see the difference now? I hope so because clearly it's not the "same difference". Just out of curiousity is this why you are called Cheeseheads? --] 01:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Lastly, I want to make it known that I certainly bear no ill will regarding our debate about the subject of grunge's relation to ]. While I disagreed with your assessment, your response to the topic was certainly the approach I prefer when it comes to debates on Misplaced Pages. I trust your judgement in nearly all editing circumstances I have witnessed, and I appreciate any sort of help you can offer in developing and improving these topics on Misplaced Pages. ] 02:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please don't be condescending. My point was that you obviously agreed with it. So you were basically agreeing with a sockpuppet who has been blocked 7 or 8 times. It doesn't exactly speak highly of you. So what's the difference really? --]<sup>]</sup> 03:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, I'll add Lollapalooza and Indie (music) to the template. As for the genre list, I've added all the ones I can think of and that have articles on WIkipedia (as far as I can tell). However, the recent addition and removal of Emo is one that highlights an unclear consensus. I didn't add it when I expanded the list because of the uncertainty. Obviously emo emerged in the DC hardcore scene, but I must say it has ventured closer to alternative rock since the 90's, especially since Sunny Day Real Estate. In it's current form (with the likes of The Used, My Chemical Romance, and scores of bands I personally don't care for at all) it pretty much is alternative rock. AMG lists it as an alt-rock genre. Consequently I think it should be listed both under punk and alternative rock genre lists. ] 02:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Well I blocked AOluwatoyin indefinitely due to sockpuppet use. If anything else, it makes blocking these socks easier. --]<sup>]</sup> 02:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm looking at trimming some items on ] because recent edits have fluctuated past the 30 kb mark. There's some notable bands/albums, especially from indie bands sicne the 90s, that still should be listed (material by No Doubt, Sebadoh, and Fugazi are the first to spring to mind) and I think a few of the lesser mainstream alternative bands and albums from the 90's can be removed to make room for them. I'm thinking along the lines of Mighty Mighty Bosstones, Better Than Ezra, Luscious Jackson, and a few others. Let me know which artist/albums you think can be trimmed from the list. | |||
| == Objectivism: most vs some == | |||
| Also, I think we should the White Stripes and the Strokes both to the timeline and the list of bands. While they may be garage rock revial, they aren't mere traditionalists like, say, the Hives or Jet are. They are indie rock bands that revive garage rock styles (The Strokes more so than the White Stripes; the Strokes basically defined the NY indie scene when they debuted), which certainly belong on such lists; also, the White Stripes reference blues and the Strokes have veered more toward traditional alt-rock in recent years. Even though I'm not particularly a fan of either, I feel by excluding them we ignore an important part of modern alternative/indie music. ] 10:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi I noticed that you changed the ] article to state that most academics rejected it, I started a topic on the talk page to discus this point.--]] 22:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This sounds like a bad idea if it is just because of file size. Why not just split the page into decades or something? The current article, if it is so bloated, can still be retained as an abridged/summary version to trim per your liking or the latest whim without loss of content elsewhere. -] 17:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == FAR... == | |||
| == Arbitration case (Danteferno and Leyasu) == | |||
| Hi there, because the "Writing style" and "Fandom" sections of ] are not refed and are possibly OR, I've listed it at ]. Thanks, ] ] 00:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I read at ] that you have been involved in a recent dispute with ]. He filed an RfAr a few days ago against ]. The case is currently listed on the main ] page. Just letting you know, in case you had any ties to the ] article or anything else to say about the users involved. --] (]) 01:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == A barnstar - no more, no less == | |||
| Just wondering, do you think the article is good enough now for a Featured Article nomination?--] 15:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ], hereby award '''LGagnon''' a barnstar for the sheer amount of ]-related articles he has created, expanded, corrected, etc... 15:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)]] | |||
| ==FYI== | |||
| I though it was about time you got one of these... ] 15:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * You may wish to voice your opinion/vote at ]. Yours, ] 07:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC). | |||
| **On a related issue, What is your opinion regarding the "non-compliant" tag that ] placed on the article ] ? Yours, ] 07:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC). | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| == Re:Barnstar == | |||
| I have updated the '']'' article entry. Take a look and let me know what you think, on the article's talk page. Yours, ] 23:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC). | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Oh! And thanks for putting the Barnstar on your user page. - ]<sup>] 18:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may wish to comment at ]. Yours, ] 03:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC). | |||
| == |
== The Tireless Contributor Barnstar == | ||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| I left a comment on the ] about the edit you reverted. I'd appreciate it if you could take the time to read over it and respond. (I'm adding this here because I'm not sure if you're watching that page or not). Thanks. —] 00:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I present to you this award for your hard work on the ] article. ] 20:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Your edit to ]== | |||
| == Pearl Jam vs. Ticketmaster == | |||
| Your recent edit to ] () was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair ] to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ''']''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // ] 03:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Stephen King short stories}} == | |||
| I think there should be something about Pearl Jam's battle with Ticketmaster on the ]. Maybe something specific like the date they testified before the Senate (or House, I forget). I figured given your knowledge of grunge you would be able to add the relevant information. I know a lot about grunge myself, but that's one of the things I never paid much attention to. ] 10:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!-- Tfdnotice --> --] 20:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikiproject == | |||
| == Spoiler redirects == | |||
| I'm interested in starting a WikiProject for Alternative/indie music. From months of combing through various band and genre pages I've noticed that there should be better coordination between them. Additionally, since a good deal of the subjects aren't exactly the most well-known and many bands are notable yet have barely presence out of the underground rock scene, it'd be nice to coordinate a group of interested editors who are willing to work together on alternative rock and its various subgenres. Cetainly the level of care put into featured articles like ], ] and ] should be applied to ], ], ], ], ], and countless others. So I'd like to start a project in the next few days. I know that a previous WikiProject called ] exists, but's it's been inactive for nearly two years, and its scope was limited. I want give attention to all forms of alternative music by cataloguing genres, expanding band pages, looking up sources, and so forth. If you are interesting in joining and/or can recommend anyone else, let me know. ] 03:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Should I make spoiler redirects for Walter's and Marten's redirect pages? Someone new to the DT series might look up Marten or Walter and find out he's Flagg before they get to that part.--] 22:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I made a temp page for the project at ]. I also listed the project at ]. Feel free to edit the temp page and add relevant pages to the relevant sections as you see fit. Also feel free to recommend how the page should be laid out (I just used the heavy metal project as a template, but we can alter it in order to better serve our purposes). ] 07:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Apologies == | ||
| I put ] on CfD, but I think I should've told you first as you created it. I did this mostly for consistency with the decision on ].--] 04:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I was wondering when the "clean up" tag is going away in the Gen-X article as you specifically asked me to make certain ammends. Even though this article is far from, say, pinponting a demographic, it does cover a lot of credible viewpoints. Also, the "American Generations" Table that mysteriously appears here and elsewhere is very disputed; 1) it slants the article "American" 2) the birth years are in dispute. ] 20:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sorry I don't have a song with this!== | |||
| == Wikiproject started == | |||
| <div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| Ok, I started the project, which is located at ]. ] 22:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello: == | |||
| {{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| Hi I'm a new Wikipedian from Natick, Mass... just popped in to say hello to my Wiki neighbor:" | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile -->] 06:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC). | |||
| ] ] ] <font face="Comic Sans MS" colour="navy" size="-1"><b>] (]) | |||
| == ARI == | |||
| *Hi I Am Marc: | |||
| I was recently married to my lovely wife; | |||
| We have lived together for several years already... | |||
| *We love cats (''3 currently own us'')... Jeffy(15), Echo(6) & Gizmo(3). All sleep with us in the big bed and no room to move an inch. | |||
| *I was Disabled in a 1993 (Coma)/ and am very slowly recovering. It's tough going out sometimes, though with friends I still do. I have a few supportive friends. | |||
| *I am an "]." Democrat/ Republicans, I don't care, whoever serves makes my life better in the long run I vote for! | |||
| *Avid reader. Has collection of many hundreds of rare books. Especially Science Fiction and Fantasy. | |||
| *Avid Music collector (2,500 albums)...mostly bootlegs...mostly rare bootlegs...Stones, Kinks, Clapton, Beatles. and solos! | |||
| ------------------------------------------------- | |||
| You might want to look at what's going on at ]. ] 16:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''I am what I am'' | |||
| I'm strongly opinionated about disabled peoples' rights and jobs for American citizens who have trouble finding minimum wage jobs in my state today and support ], I would be dead if I did not have it. I am an idiot about Internet social skills. I hope that the Immigration Reform bill will protect disabled citizens who wish to work like myself first before considering allowing new people to come here. I was searching for an internet forum to be my outlet to express my needs, but found that Misplaced Pages is not best suited for that. I'm brushing up on Misplaced Pages's rules of conduct, and slowly starting to begin contributing again. | |||
| ------------------------------------------------------ | |||
| '''Current book and CD | |||
| I own hundreds of rare books''' | |||
| ==Your Zinn paragraph is most definitely not NPOV== | |||
| *''Current Book'' Jack Whyte: "Uther" | |||
| *''Current CD Faves'': | |||
| **Warren Zevon... "Life'll Kill Ya" | |||
| **Howlin' Wolf: "Greatest Hits" | |||
| *Latest Flick: "Charles II: The Last King" | |||
| ------------------------------------------------ | |||
| ----------------------------------------------------- | |||
| ] ] ] <font face="Comic Sans MS" colour="navy" size="-1"><b>] (]) | |||
| Your Zinn paragraph is not written to express a summary of different views concerning whether or not the Supreme Court is politically motivated. It offers no differing viewpoints from a variety of sources and chooses to emphasize only one interpretation. Its only goal is apparently the injection of a Marxist critique concerning the structure of the United States' federal judiciary. That is definitely not NPOV. | |||
| == Good Articles == | |||
| See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute | |||
| Hey! Since I've given you some work to do on ], perhaps you'd like to review one of my nominated articles? :) I trust you to pass it if it so deserves or fail it if doesn't :) --] 14:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] 04:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Article Reversions == | |||
| ::The addition of a Marxist critique to a description of what most in America regard as a necessary democratic institution in a three-branch government system (see the Federalist Papers if you don't believe me) is in and of itself controversial. Therefore, you should've taken a more cautious, objective and common-sense approach to introducing the topic you wish to present. It appears that you only wish to introduce ideology and not have a balanced discussion of the politicization of the judicial branch. | |||
| Dear LGagnon, | |||
| :::] 05:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Signature == | |||
| We noticed that you totally reverted the recent editing done to the following articles: Dead Kennedys, California Uber Alles, Holiday In Cambodia, Mutiny On the Bay, Alternative Tentacles, East Bay Ray, Jello Biafra. | |||
| I just wanted to inform you that in your signature preferences, I believe that you may not have "raw signature" checked. Make sure that to check that box so when you sign your <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>s, it will work in the way that you intended. Cheers! —<span style="font-family: Verdana">] <sub>(] | ] | ])</sub></span> 16:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| As the original entries contained obvious bias and misstated facts, we believe that a total reversion does not conform to the ‘neutral point of view’ policy of Misplaced Pages. On your User page we notice that you list Jello Biafra as a hero, and perhaps you have reverted the articles with that in mind. | |||
| == FAR == | |||
| However, Misplaced Pages is more than about advocacy. There were things in the above original entries that are factually incorrect, based on unreliable sources or are simply biased opinion. Please leave the recent edits alone until you know all the facts. And please feel free to contact us by email on any fact that you might question and we can work to resolve the issue. | |||
| ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. ] <sup>]</sup>] 17:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Some of the original information looks like it simply came straight from Biafra’s press releases, but he was found to “lack credibility” by all the courts involved. Copies of the Court Judgment against Biafra are on public file in San Francisco, CA. You may not like some of the information in the corrected articles, but it has been found to be true by a neutral court of law and it is the public record. | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Thank you, | |||
| ] | |||
| <div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| == EBR sock puppet is back == | |||
| {{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| ...and he's got his astroturf kit with him. I just had to revert several things he redid back to your rv's. What a pain in the ass. If it's really EBR, I'm surprised he was able to lift his head away from his coke mirror, the prick. Have a nice day. --] 12:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| Just popping around today and thought I'd say "hi" since I saw you also go to a UMass. Nothing more to say, really. Looks like you've done some good work, so keep it up! — ] 08:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Thanks == | ||
| {{WikiCookie|For removing dubious yet funny info from the ] article! :)}} | |||
| Hey, thanks for removing the book "Scandalous Hegemony" from the Noam Chomsky page. I didn't even notice it! --] 02:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Oh hey, appropriate you're the first one to comment on it... you're the guy who started the thing! ] <small>]</small> 01:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi LGagnon, please add the original link to the picture on burningwell.org since I wasn't able to find it there. Regards, --] 10:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== ] == | ||
| I'm trying to get Randall Flagg's article to either GA or FA status. I've put a lot of effort in the article in the last couple of weeks, expanding and reworking various sections along with adding sources and external information such as quotes and analysis. I put it up for ] at ]. Any suggestions you have would be welcome.--] 18:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, for the past few days I've been trying to mold ], currently a Good Article, into a Featured Article. While I'm still hunting down a few more sources and have major parts to add (an Influences section) or subtract (move the Discography to a new page), it'd really help if you could go over the article and provide some feedback about it before the inevitable Peer Review. Most importantly, I'm concerned with how it reads; is it wholly accessible and does it cover all important information an uninformed reader might need to know? Is it written well? Feel free to fix up little mistakes or (if possible) add new material with sources, but feedback would be most appreciated. ] 08:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Wikisource image == | ||
| Hi, I'm a new administrator at Wikisource, and a more experienced admin has been talking me through some admin tasks. See . I made a mistake in that I dealt with the first part, where he was telling me about deleting images from ], before properly reading the second part. I assumed that the second part related to other images. The reason I'm mentioning it to you is that ] was in that category, and he suggested that I might want to chat with the uploader before deleting it. | |||
| When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to ] by adding '''subst:''' to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. <!-- Template:Subst --> — ] <small>]</small> 22:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Anyway, I went ahead and deleted it before realizing that that was the image about which he had said that I might want to chat with you first. It had no licence. If I've done the wrong thing and if it's public domain or available under some kind of free licence, please let me know. Apparently it's possible to restore things that I've deleted. The image, in any case, was not being used. I'm posting here because you've used this account more recently than the Wikisource one. Regards. ] (]) 01:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Randall Flagg is now a Good Article== | |||
| ==Infobox Writer== | |||
| Just thought you'd like to know that ] has now passed ].--] (]) 02:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Slow down on this - You have had only two responses on this template since you announced it on the Books WikiProject - both negative and you are rapidly propagating it's use - slow down and get some reaction and concensus first. :: ] : ]/] 15:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * As I noted at ] I don't see that the infobox has added any value to the article, and has detracted from the layout. --] 01:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== CrimethInc. images == | ||
| Yo, I was wondering if you were the same individual as Flickr user ? And if so, is there any chance you would release your ]-related images under a free or Creative Commons license? I'm thinking specifically of , but any others would be fantastic also. Regards, ] 19:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, there. I've added a section the the ] page regarding their marketing (partiularly in the 80's early 90's) I was hoping to be able to explore that area further. Do you have anything you might be able to add? ] 19:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah, I understand. In any case, if you do have/know of any other usable images, they would be most appreciated. Thanks for your response, ] 19:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Guts in Playboy== | ||
| Hey, in the ] article you wrote about 'Guts' being in Playboy in March of 2004, and that Chuck offered another story to be in Playboy as well but it was too gross and got turned down. Do you happen to know what the other Palahniuk story was that he submitted to Playboy? Thanks in advance!!! Also, your political views and interests are spot on good sir. -] (]) 09:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I saw you contributed to the ] article. Were they a Jam Band? ] 18:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)TommyBoy76 | |||
| :Thanks. I was looking for a new song for my MySpace (Heh, I'm a teenager, gimme a break) and when I looked them up, it said Jam Band was their genre. Not exactly a reliable source, MySpace, but it sprung a question. Anyway, thanks again. See ya, in th next life. --tommyboy76 | |||
| ==Image copyright problem with Image:Chuckpalahniuknet.PNG== | |||
| == Chris Matthew Sciabarra == | |||
| Thanks for uploading ]. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of ], but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets ]. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an ] linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check | |||
| :* That there is a ] on the image's description page for each article the image is used in. | |||
| It's not entirely clear from his stub-like article, but ] quite likely qualifies as a critic of Objectivism. He's sympathetic but not an Objectivist, and much of what he says is not welcome news to Objectivists. Check out some of the links and see for yourself. ] 19:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :* That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. | |||
| <!-- Additional 10c list header goes here --> | |||
| This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. --23:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Libertarianism== | |||
| Do you understand his userpage? I think that this user might be intentionally NPOV to ] as part of some sort of test or program. ] 23:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I hope you continue to assist working in the Libertarianism article. I've made significant edits which most have been removed trying to bring context. They barely let me keep what I added on the word's origins. Thanks ] (]) 15:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :You do realize that I consider myself an Obectivist, albiet a rational one that thinks NPOV is still a good idea. ] 00:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==List of space combat flight simulator games issue== | |||
| :: '''The RJII Project began as a one year mission, however, due to a stronger than expected show of resistance due to entrenched bias and irrational integration of information, the Project was extended for a few months so that its goals for Misplaced Pages could be fully realized. Though resistance was significant, through the use of advanced...''' Sounds like a spam / NPOV campaign to me, especially with their accusations that LGagnon is taking part in personal attacks -- ] 15:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I was just browsing around and came to one of my most favorite lists, the list of Virtual Boy Games, now I kinda liked it better with the red coloring but hehehe, what I am messaging you about is that I have a problem. There is a heated debate about changing the article of ] to the "Chronological list of space flight simulation games", and moving the date to the first column instead of the second. Seeing as how you have done many more lists than I and seeing as how your lists have stood the test of time, I seek your advice ehheeh. I don't like the chronological organization of the list because the year has no bearing on the game whatsoever and I just do get why we need the list to revolve around a piece of information that in many lists is excluded all together. If you could take a look at the list ] and give your comments ] I would be really happy. Maybe I am right, maybe I am wrong, but I feel strongly name should be in the first column. Anyways, we got an administrator to facilitate the situation and the direction of this conversation will determine the fate of this page, so if you could give your two cents, I would be very grateful. Thank you so much --] (]) 03:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Clear Channel== | |||
| I have decided to stop editing the article as I feel I would not want an article I created under such a high degree of scrutiny to the point where I may feel defensive. I do ask however that you attempt to find a link of the document scanned, reproductions barely serve as evidence since they lack hints of proof such as letterheads or for the case of emails, addresses and identifying servers etc. I wish you the best in your wiki editing and not that it should be relevant, I wish I would have noticed you created the article sooner. I hope no hard feelings come of this. --] ] 00:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of List of cel-shaded video games== | |||
| == Research Question == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <sub><small>] (])</small></sub> 16:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == GA reassessment of ] == | |||
| Where did you find the info that The Stand is a reworking of Night Surf? | |||
| I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the ]. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at ]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. ] (]) 18:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Ayn Rand and Objectivists == | |||
| == GA reassessment of ] == | |||
| Hey, what is your problem with Objectivists? I think you might have been soured by a few bad apples. Do you know any? Perhaps if you actually talked to some, you might change your mind. I run ObjectivismOnline.Net – the biggest Objectivist community on the net. Go to our forum http://forum.objectivismonline.net/ and check out some of the discussions. We have all kinds of people on board. | |||
| Message me on AIM - GreedyCapitalist if you want to discuss your views. | |||
| I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the ]. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at ]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. ] (]) 16:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I also run the Objectivist Wiki here: http://wiki.objectivismonline.net/ | |||
| Cheers, --] 23:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Requesting your opinion== | |||
| Hi. I've started a discussion . (Actually, it's a ''restart'' of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. ] (]) 01:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==RfD nomination of ]== | |||
| === Ayn Rand POV links === | |||
| I have nominated {{lt|POVabout}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 15:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==CfD nomination of ]== | |||
| What is the procedure for removing the POV links you put up? Why did you put them up in the first place? | |||
| I have nominated {{lc|Music documentary films}} for renaming to {{lc|Documentary films about music}}. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 19:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Alternative musicians== | ||
| ]''']''', which you created, has been nominated for ], ], or ]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 14:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Sounds about right for a non-religious cult based on the ] entry and the Objectivist entry as well... You do realize that you're just adding fuel to the fire with that category addition though, right? --] 20:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Psychological Criticism == | |||
| ==Don't make personal attacks against other editors== | |||
| I noticed in the "]" article that on the 24th of May, 2006, you added a bit that has since changed into it's own category. It speaks of Nathaniel Branden's belief that the book may be harmful psychologically. There is a problem with neutrality in that he was fine with the book until his romantic and business relationship with Ayn Rand exploded in a rather a bitter fashion. Given the number of Rand critics, could you find a different person to address the psychological issue? And one that has a psychology degree from an accredited university, since Branden did not? It would help in the "neutrality" issue, and mean that I don't have to take it down. After all, no critic is ever truly neutral, but surely we should draw the line at posting things from exes, right? *smiles* | |||
| Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against ]. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be ] from editing by admins or ] by the ]. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please ] appropriately. Thank you. <!-- Template:Attack --> | |||
| Oh, and please know, in spite of what I said on the talk page of "Atlas Shrugged", I won't actually take anything down until you've stopped by to discuss it, or until a bit of time has gone by in which you've had some opportunity to respond. It did, after all, take a long time to find you! | |||
| A couple examples of your many personal attacks: ] 15:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I am in no way attempting to upset you, or to arbitrarily remove any work. I've plenty of disagreement with Rand, and plenty I agree with, just think the ex's comments are not needed. | |||
| : Those don't look like personal attacks at all; perhaps the term "Randists" is what you're focusing on? Sounds like how I'd use the word "fan" when editing POV from a music group page. I don't really see much comparison to the ]... --] 15:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 19:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for answering! As it happens, I discussed it with some others and came to the same conclusion that you explained to me. So Branden's criticism is still in the article. ] (]) 04:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I'm new to Misplaced Pages, and I noticed the request for expert help/mediation on the Objectivism page. I have a PhD in philosophy, am not an Objectivist though I know quite a bit about it, and have no particular animus one way or another. I think I might be able to be of some assistance; the only shortcoming is a lack of experience with Misplaced Pages editing and policies, but I think I'm just the man for helping you all with your difficulties with the article. I'm not even sure if this is the right place for me to be posting this message, but if not, let me know what a better way of communicating would be. Because I am an untenured academic, any assistance offered as expert or mediator would have to be anonymous, at least as to my real name appearing in Misplaced Pages, and at least until my tenure case is concluded. --] 20:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Happy Birthday! == | ||
| {{mbox | |||
| I'm sorry to hear that you're stressing out about things on Misplaced Pages. Take a second and sit back and relax, hopefully that will help things to calm down. -- ]<font color="green">]</font> 18:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |style = background:yellow;border: 1px solid #CC9999; | |||
| |text = Happy Birthday, <b> {{ROOTPAGENAME}}, </b> from the ]! Have a nice day! ] <sub>]</sub> <sup>]</sup> 00:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| == Grunge timeline == | |||
| :'''Does not appear to be notable''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| Sweet! ] 19:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == removing my edits == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--] (])</span> 17:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| excuse me! why do you keep removing my edits from the ] article? are you trying to hurt my feelings or somethin? ] 19:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| == A new section == | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| hey LGagnon! i have added a new section to the ]! i want you to see want you think.] 19:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| LGagon WHY will you not accept that last edit that i just made? what is WRONG with you? i am TRYING to make the article miles better here! ] 19:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| :Take a look at ] and then a look at ] and you should be able to see the problem. You're adding an '''article''' to a list of '''lists'''. If there were an article that was titled ] and consisted of nothing but a list of games in which Lemmings characters were used, with links to their individual title articles, ''then'' you could add it. You're adding full articles where they do not belong. --] 19:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. | |||
| : Point taken, copying to Touth's talk page. --] 20:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. <!-- Template:Db-noimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 10:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==cult cohesion== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ::''In religion and sociology, a cult is a cohesive group of people (often | |||
| Hi. The above category, which you created, has been nominated for ] Yours, ] 17:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| "A cult is a '''cohesive''' group..."?? Objectivists are as far from cohesive as it gets! ] 00:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit ''']''' to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact ] to request that the administrator ] the page or email a copy to you. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] 20:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :ARI sticks together quite well. And all Randists I've known are cohesive. -- ] 00:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Non-free rationale for File:Palahniukchoke.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 15:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| That shows you haven't known many, or much. So ARI sticks together: why not say therefore that ARI is a cult, rather than that Objectivists, including those who oppose ARI, are a cult? If ARI is cohesive, that's very remote from saying Objectivists are cohesive. ] 00:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==RFC on cross-namespace links from ] to ]== | |||
| :As I pointed out elsewhere, the cult allegations predate the ARI. Rand's own inner circle, The Collective -- was seen as cultish. ] 04:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ]. {{#if:|{{{more}}}}} <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 12:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Please see--> | |||
| ==Category:Anime series== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. —''']''' (] | ]) 13:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| You wrote | |||
| == An RfC that you ''may'' be interested in... == | |||
| ::It follows the Word of Rand, and those who do are willing to work together despite differences | |||
| As one of the previous contributors to {{Tl|Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a ] started on the talk page as to ]. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing! | |||
| In view of the BLATANTLY obvious fact that they are NOT willing to work together despite differences---that some of them refuse to have anything to do with some of the others others, I have to conclude that you're pontificating on matters of which you are 100% ignorant. ] 22:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : <small>This message was sent by ] (]) on behalf of <span class="nowrap">{{U|]}}</span> <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)</small> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Infobox_film/list&oldid=598721132 --> | |||
| ==Category:Literature== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 00:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Oddly enough, you appear to be saying things that are clearly false. You can see that these Randists are quite capable of putting aside their differences to work together so as to remove the cult categories from the Rand articles. ] 00:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ====Regarding reversions made on ] ] (]) to ]==== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 --> | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Ban Everything.ogg== | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="user-block" | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Yuppie Cadillac.ogg== | |||
| || ] | |||
| <span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] 06:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : Re your mail: "vandalism" is difficult to define sometimes; for 3RR purposes, it must be blatant, which this wasn't ] 16:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == List Pearl Jam songs covered by others listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List Pearl Jam songs covered by others'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :: Um, why are you only talking by email? You do know you can edit this page, don't you? Anyway, read ] paying careful attention to the vandalism bit ] 19:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 20:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Not that Connolley wants to hear this, but the very fact that you had a good-faith belief that you were removing vandalism ought to be enough to leave you with a warning and explanation, not a block. Blocks are overused and punitive, which goes against ]. ] 19:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for merging of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 16:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| LGagnon, anyone can remove a <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> tag. Even Touth. It should never be restored once removed. You can list the article on AfD if you feel the need. ] 00:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your Apparent Sockpuppets == | |||
| I have good evidence to believe that you have a number of sockpuppets used to back up your views on controversial pages. These include Alienus and, more recently, Courtland Nerval. The evidence include Alienus' (erased) response on YOUR talk page to accusations made against you, a strikingly coincidental agenda and edits on pages such as Ayn Rand and Objectivism, plus an obvious coincidence on the topics both usernames edit and their (your) respective POV, common language traits, etc. Considering I don't have that much free time, and am not willing, at this moment, to make a formal complaint, I'd just like you to know that someone is aware of this. In case I'm wrong, which is very unlikely given the bulk of evidence I could pretty much just point out, please dismiss this. Otherwise, I would recommend a change in your behavior lest you get in trouble with users who may be less lenient than I.] 17:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :You figured me out, I'm actually LGagnon, and in my spare time, RJII and LaszloWalrus. :-) | |||
| :Rather than wasting time denying an obviously false claim, I encourage you to file a Checkuser request so that you can have this all confirmed, but not to make any further accusations until and unless the admins support your theory. | |||
| :Thank you for understanding. ] 17:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please by all means run a checkuser request on me. When the results come back that I am not a sockpuppet can I expect a formal apology on my talk page? I think that that would only be appropriate. --] 18:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Imposter == | |||
| You may be interested to know that ] has been blocked as an apparent imposter of you. Congratulations, if that is appropriate. :-) ] 22:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Do be careful with that statement though. NPOV is policy, so forcing you to follow it isn't necessarily such a bad thing. It just depends on various interpretations of NPOV, of course, as with all POV disputes. :-) Anyways, I don't really wish to get involved with a content dispute -- I just came to inform you about your imposter. ] 23:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Aside from the fact that these Rand fans keep pushing their POV, which conflicts with NPOV, there's the little problem of using tools such as vandalism to intimidate those who want the article to be less hagiographic. ] 23:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as ], to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is considered to be ] and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Under ], the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the ''']'''. | |||
| Please let me know directly if there are any additional sockpuppets. I'm keeping an eye on this one. Best, ] ] 23:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> –] (]]) 21:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Touth == | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic Youth Teenage Riot.ogg== | |||
| There was only one questionable action that I could find recently at all.''']''' | ] 02:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Touth == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| LGagnon! you do know that i dont like what they put on that talk page. it just HURTS me! why wont you at least let me remove that little info? once its gone then i will be alright and my feelings might get a little better. ] 01:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ]<sup>]</sup> 09:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| just why wont you help me get better? you dont like me do you? ] 02:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Ramones Sheena.ogg listed for discussion == | |||
| == Reply on ] == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 10:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Please see my reply on ]. I look forward to your thoughts. ] 05:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| == ] notice == | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 00:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for deletion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. (] · ]) ''']''' 23:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I have removed your entry on the ] about ]. The one edit you refer to is only a borderline instance of a personal attack and the user hasn't been warned. Please use the appropriate {{]}} through {{]}} warning templates if you see instances of personal attacks. Of course if attacks continue after the final warning, please bring this back to the Personal Attacks noticeboard. Thanks, ] 19:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:13, 7 December 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. LGagnon has not edited Misplaced Pages since July 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Sigh
I've blocked AOluwatoyin a couple of times. I don't quite understand what else you want here. I told you that if you wanted help, just ask me directly on my talk page. I would recommend toning down your message here. You aren't helping your cause any with it. It comes off as hostile. And reverting others comments like you say you are going to is probably going to get you blocked. Again, it doesn't help you any. --Woohookitty 02:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- I sent you an email. --Woohookitty 04:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
bias
LGagnon, I appreciate your concern with keeping wikipedia npov. However, your editing of the Ayn Rand article seems to indicate a strong negative bias. Some of your edits and concerns I agree with, despite my being an Objectivist, and therefore likely to have a favorable view of Ayn Rand. I think good criticism and controversy inforamtion shold be included. I think many of your edits though are very npov. I suggest you take a step back and think about this before proceeding.Ethan a dawe 21:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Ethan Dawe
Philosopher
What are your thoughts on "Lay Philosopher" versus "Non-Academic Philosopher?" Someone is suggesting this in regards Rand and others? Ethan a dawe 21:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Ethan DaweEthan a dawe 21:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Btw
Any more anything from AOluwatoyin and I am going to block him indefinitely. Honestly, the legal threats should've gotten him blocked indefinitely but someone beat me to it. --Woohookitty 11:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- And it looks like his comments on Jimbo's talk page were reverted. --Woohookitty 12:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- And I do apologize for not being up on this more. I've been hit by more yahoos than usual lately, including someone who said that they "liked me" and who turned out to be a sockpuppet. Not making excuses. But not enough hours in the day to stop everyone. :) --Woohookitty 12:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
You have got to me kidding me
Look at this and this. Good grief. --Woohookitty 01:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Note to readers: Please be aware that the two examples accessible by the links above were not written by the same individual but by two different editors. --142.161.184.39 21:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's a moot point since you admitted on my user page that you are the same person who added to the box first posted by wolfstar. As we say in Wisconsin, it's the same difference. --Woohookitty 05:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
OK, A writes a piece about C the contents of which C insists are libellous. B indicates only that the piece ought to have been published because it speaks the truth. Is B guilty of libel? Of course not, he didn't write the piece in the first place. A murders C. B testifies that C was a bastard and "deserved it". Did B murder C? Of Course not. Are you starting to see the difference now? I hope so because clearly it's not the "same difference". Just out of curiousity is this why you are called Cheeseheads? --209.115.235.79 01:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Please don't be condescending. My point was that you obviously agreed with it. So you were basically agreeing with a sockpuppet who has been blocked 7 or 8 times. It doesn't exactly speak highly of you. So what's the difference really? --Woohookitty 03:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well I blocked AOluwatoyin indefinitely due to sockpuppet use. If anything else, it makes blocking these socks easier. --Woohookitty 02:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Objectivism: most vs some
Hi I noticed that you changed the Objectivism article to state that most academics rejected it, I started a topic on the talk page to discus this point.--Dylan Lake 22:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
FAR...
Hi there, because the "Writing style" and "Fandom" sections of Chuck Palahniuk are not refed and are possibly OR, I've listed it at WP:FAR. Thanks, Mikker 00:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Randall Flagg
Just wondering, do you think the article is good enough now for a Featured Article nomination?--CyberGhostface 15:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
FYI
- You may wish to voice your opinion/vote at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Voyage Au Pays Des Nouveaux Gourous. Yours, Smeelgova 07:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
- On a related issue, What is your opinion regarding the "non-compliant" tag that User:Jossi placed on the article Voyage Au Pays Des Nouveaux Gourous ? Yours, Smeelgova 07:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
Cults in Our Midst
I have updated the Cults in Our Midst article entry. Take a look and let me know what you think, on the article's talk page. Yours, Smeelgova 23:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Crazy Therapies (book)
You may wish to comment at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Crazy Therapies (book). Yours, Smeelgova 03:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC).
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| I present to you this award for your hard work on the Randall Flagg article. CyberGhostface 20:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC) |
Your edit to Chuck Palahniuk
Your recent edit to Chuck Palahniuk (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Stephen King short stories
Template:Stephen King short stories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --CyberGhostface 20:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Spoiler redirects
Should I make spoiler redirects for Walter's and Marten's redirect pages? Someone new to the DT series might look up Marten or Walter and find out he's Flagg before they get to that part.--CyberGhostface 22:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Apologies
I put Category:Critics of Objectivism on CfD, but I think I should've told you first as you created it. I did this mostly for consistency with the decision on Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 13#Category:Critics of Islam.--T. Anthony 04:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry I don't have a song with this!
Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Trampton 06:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
ARI
You might want to look at what's going on at Ayn Rand Institute. ThAtSo 16:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Your Zinn paragraph is most definitely not NPOV
Your Zinn paragraph is not written to express a summary of different views concerning whether or not the Supreme Court is politically motivated. It offers no differing viewpoints from a variety of sources and chooses to emphasize only one interpretation. Its only goal is apparently the injection of a Marxist critique concerning the structure of the United States' federal judiciary. That is definitely not NPOV.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute
- The addition of a Marxist critique to a description of what most in America regard as a necessary democratic institution in a three-branch government system (see the Federalist Papers if you don't believe me) is in and of itself controversial. Therefore, you should've taken a more cautious, objective and common-sense approach to introducing the topic you wish to present. It appears that you only wish to introduce ideology and not have a balanced discussion of the politicization of the judicial branch.
Signature
I just wanted to inform you that in your signature preferences, I believe that you may not have "raw signature" checked. Make sure that to check that box so when you sign your ~~~~s, it will work in the way that you intended. Cheers! —Curran (talk | contibs | random) 16:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
FAR
Grunge music has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. NSR77 C 17:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello
The Storm Surfer has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Just popping around today and thought I'd say "hi" since I saw you also go to a UMass. Nothing more to say, really. Looks like you've done some good work, so keep it up! — The Storm Surfer 08:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey, thanks for removing the book "Scandalous Hegemony" from the Noam Chomsky page. I didn't even notice it! --Jersey Devil 02:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Image:Candyshelf.jpg
Hi LGagnon, please add the original link to the picture on burningwell.org since I wasn't able to find it there. Regards, --Flominator 10:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Randall Flagg
I'm trying to get Randall Flagg's article to either GA or FA status. I've put a lot of effort in the article in the last couple of weeks, expanding and reworking various sections along with adding sources and external information such as quotes and analysis. I put it up for peer review at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Randall Flagg. Any suggestions you have would be welcome.--CyberGhostface 18:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikisource image
Hi, I'm a new administrator at Wikisource, and a more experienced admin has been talking me through some admin tasks. See here. I made a mistake in that I dealt with the first part, where he was telling me about deleting images from Category:Orphan media, before properly reading the second part. I assumed that the second part related to other images. The reason I'm mentioning it to you is that an image uploaded by you was in that category, and he suggested that I might want to chat with the uploader before deleting it.
Anyway, I went ahead and deleted it before realizing that that was the image about which he had said that I might want to chat with you first. It had no licence. If I've done the wrong thing and if it's public domain or available under some kind of free licence, please let me know. Apparently it's possible to restore things that I've deleted. The image, in any case, was not being used. I'm posting here because you've used this account more recently than the Wikisource one. Regards. Cowardly Lion (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Randall Flagg is now a Good Article
Just thought you'd like to know that Randall Flagg has now passed Good article status.--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
CrimethInc. images
Yo, I was wondering if you were the same individual as Flickr user LGagnon? And if so, is there any chance you would release your CrimethInc.-related images under a free or Creative Commons license? I'm thinking specifically of this image, but any others would be fantastic also. Regards, Skomorokh 19:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I understand. In any case, if you do have/know of any other usable images, they would be most appreciated. Thanks for your response, Skomorokh 19:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Guts in Playboy
Hey, in the Haunted article you wrote about 'Guts' being in Playboy in March of 2004, and that Chuck offered another story to be in Playboy as well but it was too gross and got turned down. Do you happen to know what the other Palahniuk story was that he submitted to Playboy? Thanks in advance!!! Also, your political views and interests are spot on good sir. -Tubeyes (talk) 09:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Chuckpalahniuknet.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Chuckpalahniuknet.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Misplaced Pages's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. --23:24, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Libertarianism
I hope you continue to assist working in the Libertarianism article. I've made significant edits which most have been removed trying to bring context. They barely let me keep what I added on the word's origins. Thanks q (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
List of space combat flight simulator games issue
I was just browsing around and came to one of my most favorite lists, the list of Virtual Boy Games, now I kinda liked it better with the red coloring but hehehe, what I am messaging you about is that I have a problem. There is a heated debate about changing the article of List of space flight simulation games to the "Chronological list of space flight simulation games", and moving the date to the first column instead of the second. Seeing as how you have done many more lists than I and seeing as how your lists have stood the test of time, I seek your advice ehheeh. I don't like the chronological organization of the list because the year has no bearing on the game whatsoever and I just do get why we need the list to revolve around a piece of information that in many lists is excluded all together. If you could take a look at the list List of space flight simulation games and give your comments here at the Wikiproject Video games talk page I would be really happy. Maybe I am right, maybe I am wrong, but I feel strongly name should be in the first column. Anyways, we got an administrator to facilitate the situation and the direction of this conversation will determine the fate of this page, so if you could give your two cents, I would be very grateful. Thank you so much --Kirihari (talk) 03:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of cel-shaded video games
I have nominated List of cel-shaded video games, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of cel-shaded video games. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Alternative rock
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Alternative rock/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Kurt Cobain
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Kurt Cobain/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Requesting your opinion
Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Template:POVabout
I have nominated Template:POVabout (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Music documentary films
I have nominated Category:Music documentary films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Documentary films about music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Alternative musicians
Category:Alternative musicians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Psychological Criticism
I noticed in the "Atlas Shrugged" article that on the 24th of May, 2006, you added a bit that has since changed into it's own category. It speaks of Nathaniel Branden's belief that the book may be harmful psychologically. There is a problem with neutrality in that he was fine with the book until his romantic and business relationship with Ayn Rand exploded in a rather a bitter fashion. Given the number of Rand critics, could you find a different person to address the psychological issue? And one that has a psychology degree from an accredited university, since Branden did not? It would help in the "neutrality" issue, and mean that I don't have to take it down. After all, no critic is ever truly neutral, but surely we should draw the line at posting things from exes, right? *smiles*
Oh, and please know, in spite of what I said on the talk page of "Atlas Shrugged", I won't actually take anything down until you've stopped by to discuss it, or until a bit of time has gone by in which you've had some opportunity to respond. It did, after all, take a long time to find you!
I am in no way attempting to upset you, or to arbitrarily remove any work. I've plenty of disagreement with Rand, and plenty I agree with, just think the ex's comments are not needed.
Alexandria177 (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for answering! As it happens, I discussed it with some others and came to the same conclusion that you explained to me. So Branden's criticism is still in the article. Alexandria177 (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
 | Happy Birthday, LGagnon, from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Logan Talk 00:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of As Good as Dead
The article As Good as Dead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not appear to be notable
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nuujinn (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of alternative rock artists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of alternative rock artists is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of alternative rock artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 22:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:View from the Green Monster.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:View from the Green Monster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Category:Critics of Objectivism
Hi. The above category, which you created, has been nominated for WP:CFD here. Yours, Quis separabit? 17:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TM 20:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Palahniukchoke.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Palahniukchoke.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
RFC on cross-namespace links from Jimmy Wales to user:Jimbo Wales
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Jimmy Wales#Rfc: Links to user:Jimbo Wales. John Vandenberg 12:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Category:Anime series
Category:Anime series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 13:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Category:Literature
Category:Literature, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 00:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ban Everything.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Ban Everything.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Yuppie Cadillac.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Yuppie Cadillac.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
List Pearl Jam songs covered by others listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List Pearl Jam songs covered by others. Since you had some involvement with the List Pearl Jam songs covered by others redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of List of video game franchises for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of video game franchises is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of video game franchises until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox playwright
Template:Infobox playwright has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox writer. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of film seris hexologies too ???
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as List of film seris hexologies too ???, to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic Youth Teenage Riot.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Sonic Youth Teenage Riot.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Timeline of alternative rock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of alternative rock is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Timeline of alternative rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Enjoyer of World 09:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Ramones Sheena.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ramones Sheena.ogg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Mac Hall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mac Hall is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mac Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Ten Pound Hammer • 00:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Category:Critics of Objectivism (Ayn Rand) has been nominated for deletion
Category:Critics of Objectivism (Ayn Rand) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 23:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories: