Misplaced Pages

Karma in Buddhism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:55, 16 November 2014 editJoshua Jonathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers107,099 editsm Mādhyamaka philosophy: typo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:45, 19 November 2024 edit undoFrietjes (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors1,000,827 edits replace {{my|...}} with {{lang|my|...}} per TfD outcome 
(602 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Action driven by intention which leads to future consequences}}
{{for|the use of this term in other Indian religions|Karma}} {{for|the use of this term in other Indian religions|Karma}}
{{multiple issues|
{{cleanup|reason=Too many quotes|date=November 2014}}
{{confusing|date=November 2014}}
{{essay-like|date=November 2014}}
{{overly detailed|date=November 2014}}
{{very long|date=November 2014}}
}}
{{Buddhist term {{Buddhist term
| title=karma | title=karma
|sa=कर्मन्
| pi= kamma
| sa-Latn= karman
| sa= karma<br/>(]: कर्मन्)
|pi=𑀓𑀫𑁆𑀫​
| bn=কর্ম <br/> ''kôrmô''
| pi-Latn=kamma
| bn=কর্ম
|bn-Latn=kôrmô
| en= karma | en= karma
| bo= ལས། | bo= ལས།
| bo-Latn=]: las; <br />]: lé; | bo-Latn=]: las; <br />]: lé;
|zh= 業 |zh= 業 or 业
|zh-Latn=yè |zh-Latn=yè
|ja=業 or ごう |ja=業 or ごう
|ja-Latn=gou |ja-Latn=gou
|km=កម្ម<br />(]: {{transliteration|km|kâmm}}; ]: {{transliteration|km|kamm}}; {{IPA-km|kam|IPA}})
|km=កម្ម
|ko=업<br/>(uhb) |ko=업 or 業
|ko-Latn=uhb
|vi=nghiệp
|業 or 业
|my={{my|ကံ}}
|my={{lang|my|ကံ}}
|my-Latn=kàɴ
|my-Latn=kàɰ̃
|si=]<br/>(karma)
|si=]
|th=กรรม<br/>(gam)
|si-Latn=karma
}}{{Buddhism}}
|tl=kalma
'''Karma''' (Sanskrit, also ''karman'', Pāli: ''kamma'') is a Sanskrit term that literally means "action" or "doing". In the ] tradition, ''karma'' refers intention ('']'') beyond ones deeds. ''Karmic actions'' are considered to be the engine which drives the cycle of uncontrolled rebirth ('']'') for sentient beings.
|th=กรรม
|th-Latn=gam
|vi=Nghiệp
}}
{{Buddhism}}


'''Karma''' (Sanskrit: कर्म, Pāli: ''kamma'') is a Sanskrit term that literally means "action" or "doing". In the ] tradition, ''karma'' refers to action driven by intention ('']'') which leads to future consequences. Those intentions are considered to be the determining factor in the kind of rebirth in '']'', the cycle of rebirth.
The Buddha taught that wholesome actions (free from '']'', '']'', and '']'') lead to happiness and eventually to liberation; and unwholesome actions (based in ''attachment'', ''aversion'' and ''ignorance'') lead to suffering.


==Etymology== ==Etymology==
The word ''karma'' derives from the verbal root ''kṛ'', which means "do, make, perform, accomplish."{{sfn|Chapple|1986|p=2}}}} ''Karma'' (Sanskrit, also ''karman'', Pāli: ''kamma'', Tib. ''las''{{sfn|Padmakara Translation Group|1994|p=101}}) is a Sanskrit term that literally means "action" or "doing". The word ''karma'' derives from the verbal root ''kṛ'', which means "do, make, perform, accomplish."{{sfn|Chapple|1986|p=2}}

''Karmaphala'' (Tib. ''rgyu 'bras''{{sfn|Lichter|Epstein|1983|p=232}}{{sfn|Padmakara Translation Group|1994|p=101}}{{refn|group=note|In common Tibetan common speech, the term ''las'', "karma", is often used to denote the entire process of karma-and-fruit.{{sfn|Padmakara Translation Group|1994|p=101}}}}) is the ],{{sfn|Kalupahana|1992|p=166}}{{sfn|Keown|2000|pp=36-37}}{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=19}} "effect"{{sfn|Kopf|2001|p=141}} or "result"{{sfn|Kragh|2006|p=11}} of ''karma''. A similar term is ''karmavipaka'', the ]{{sfn|Keown|2000|p=810-813}} or "cooking"{{sfn|Klostermaier|1986|p=93}} of ''karma'':
{{blockquote|The remote effects of karmic choices are referred to as the 'maturation' (vipāka) or 'fruit' (phala) of the karmic act."{{sfn|Keown|2000|pp=36-37}}}}

The metaphor is derived from agriculture:{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=19}}{{sfn|Keown|2000|p=37}}
{{blockquote|One sows a seed, there is a time lag during which some mysterious invisible process takes place, and then the plant pops up and can be harvested.{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=19}}}}


==Buddhist understanding of ''karma''== ==Buddhist understanding of ''karma''==
], ].]]

''Karma'' and ''karmaphala'' are fundamental concepts in Buddhism.{{sfn|Kragh|2006|p=11}}{{sfn|Lamotte|1987|p=15}} The concepts of ''karma'' and ''karmaphala'' explain how intentional actions keep one tied to rebirth in ''samsara'', whereas the Buddhist path, as exemplified in the ], shows us the way out of ''samsara''.{{sfn|Bucknell|1984}}

===Rebirth===
],{{refn|group=note|Sanskrit, punaraāvŗtti, punarutpatti, punarjanman, or punarjīlvātu}}, is a common belief in all Buddhist traditions. It says that birth and death in the ] occur in ] driven by ignorance ('']''), desire ('']''), and hatred ('']''). The cycle of rebirth is called '']''. It is a beginningless and ever-ongoing process.{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=712}} Liberation from ''samsāra'' can be attained by following the ]. This path leads to ''vidyā'' (knowledge), and the stilling of ''trsnā'' and ''dvesa''. Hereby the ongoing process of rebirth is stopped.


===Intention=== ===Karma===
In Buddhism, ''karma'' refers to the intentions ('']'') of actions,{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=119-120}}{{refn|group=note|Rupert Gethin: " a being’s intentional ‘actions’ of body, speech, and mind—whatever is done, said, or even just thought with definite intention or volition";{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=119}} "t root karma or ‘action’ is considered a mental act or intention; it is an aspect of our mental life: ‘It is “intention” that I call karma; having formed the intention, one performs acts (karma) by body, speech and mind."{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=120}}}} the seeds of which will inevitably ripen into a result or fruition, referred to as '']'' or '']'' in Sanskrit and Pali. In the ''Nibbedhika Sutta'', ] 6.63, the Buddha said: The cycle of rebirth is determined by ''karma'',{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=712}} literally "action".{{refn|group=note|In early Buddhism rebirth is ascribed to craving or ignorance,{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxi}}{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=416}} and the theory of ''karma'' may have been of minor importance in early Buddhist soteriology.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}}{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986|pp=206-207}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=13}}}} In the ] tradition, ''karma'' refers to actions driven by ''intention'' ('']''),{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998}}{{sfn|Gethin|1998|pp=119-120}}{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=19}}<!---START OF NOTE--->{{refn|group=quote|Rupert Gethin: " a being’s intentional 'actions' of body, speech, and mind—whatever is done, said, or even just thought with definite intention or volition";{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=119}} "t root karma or 'action' is considered a mental act or intention; it is an aspect of our mental life: 'It is "intention" that I call karma; having formed the intention, one performs acts (karma) by body, speech and mind.'"{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=120}}}}<!---END OF NOTE---> a deed done deliberately through body, speech or mind, which leads to future consequences.{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=55}} The ''Nibbedhika Sutta'', ] 6.63:{{blockquote|Intention ('']'') I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.<ref group=web>Thanissaro Bhikkhu, trans. (1997). , AN 6.63, PTS: A iii 410</ref>{{refn|group=note|There are many different translation of the above quote into English. For example, Peter Harvey translates the quote as follows: "It is will (''cetana''), O monks, that I call karma; having willed, one acts through body, speech, and mind." (A.III.415).{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}}}}}
{{quote|Intention ('']'') I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.<ref group=web>http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an06/an06.063.than.html</ref>{{refn|group=note|There are many different translation of the above quote into English. For example, Peter Harvey translates the quote as follows: "It is will (''cetana''), O monks, that I call karma; having willed, one acts through body, speech, and mind." (A.III.415).{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}}}}}


According to Peter Harvey, According to Peter Harvey,
{{quote|It is the psychological impulse behind an action that is 'karma', that which sets going a chain of causes culminating in karmic fruit. Actions, then, must be intentional if they are to generate karmic. fruits{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}}} {{blockquote|It is the psychological impulse behind an action that is 'karma', that which sets going a chain of causes culminating in karmic fruit. Actions, then, must be intentional if they are to generate karmic fruits.{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}}}


And according to Gombrich,
Contemporary scholar Wataru Ryose notes that the Buddha understood karma as human action, and was therefore referred to as ''kammavada'' (the holder of the view of karma) or ''kiriyavada'' (the promulgator of the consequence of karma).{{sfn|Ryose|1987|p=1}}{{refn|group=note|Ryose references DN I, p.115 of the Rhys-Davids translation{{sfn|Ryose|1987|p=1}}}} According to Joseph Goldstein, only our actions and their results truly belong to us.{{refn|group=note|Joseph Goldstein states: "According to the law of karma, the only things that can be said to truly belong to us are our actions and their results; the results of our actions follow us like a shadow, or, to use an ancient image, like the wheel of the oxcart following the foot of the ox. This principle is so fundamental and far-reaching that it was emphasized again and again by the Buddha and by the great enlightened beings up until the present."{{sfn|Goldstein|2013|p=8}}}}
{{blockquote|The Buddha defined karma as intention; whether the intention manifested itself in physical, vocal or mental form, it was the intention alone which had a moral character: good, bad or neutral The focus of interest shifted from physical action, involving people and objects in the real world, to psychological process.{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=51}}}}


According to Gombrich, this was a great innovation, which overturns brahmanical, caste-bound ethics. It is a rejection of caste-bound differences, giving the same possibility to reach liberation to all people, not just Brahmanins:{{sfn|Gombrich|1996|pp=65-66}}
===Circumstantial factors===
{{blockquote|Not by birth is one a brahmin or an outcaste, but by deeds (''kamma'').{{sfn|Gombrich|1996|p=68}}{{refn|group=note|Sutta-nipata verse 1366}}}}
According to Kalupahana, the Buddha's theory of moral behavior was not strictly deterministic, but incorporated circumstantial factors. His description of the workings of karma is not an all-inclusive one, unlike that of the Jains.{{sfn|Kalupahana|1975|p=127}} In the Buddhist theory of karma, the karmic effect of a deed is not determined solely by the deed itself, but also by the nature of the person who commits the deed and by the circumstances in which it is committed.{{sfn|Kalupahana|1975|p=131}} The Buddha gave answers to various questions to specific people in specific contexts, and it is possible to find several causal explanations of behavior in the early Buddhist texts.{{sfn|Kalupahana|1975|p=127}}


How this emphasis on intention was to be interpreted became a matter of debate in and between the various Buddhist schools.{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|pp=54-55}}{{refn|group=note|For example, the ], a subsect of the ], the most important of the ],{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=54}} regarded the intention to be the stimulus for ''karma'', action which leads to consequences.{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|pp=54-55}} The ], the other sub-sect of the Sarvastivada, separated the intention from the act, regarding intention as karma proper.{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=55}}{{refn|group=quote|Gombrich: "Bodily and verbal action manifested one’s intention to others and therefore were called vijñapti, ‘information’."{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=55}}}}}}
==Relation to other teachings==

Karma is the driving force behind rebirth in the six realms of '']'' is ''karma''.{{refn|group=note|The driving force behind rebirth in the six realms of samsara is karma:
===Karmaphala===
Karma leads to future consequences, ''karma-phala'', "fruit of action".{{sfn|Kalupahana|1992|p=166}} Any given action may cause all sorts of results, but the ''karmic results'' are only those results which are a consequence of both the moral quality of the action, and of the intention behind the action.{{sfn|Reichenbach|1988|p=399}}{{refn|group=note|In the ] they are referred to by specific names for the sake of clarity, karmic causes being the "cause of results" (S. ''vipāka-hetu'') and the karmic results being the "resultant fruit" (S. ''vipāka-phala'').{{sfn|Waldron|2003|p=61}}}} According to Reichenbach,
{{blockquote|he consequences envisioned by the law of karma encompass more (as well as less) than the observed natural or physical results which follow upon the performance of an action.{{sfn|Reichenbach|1990|p=1}}}}

The "law of karma" applies
{{blockquote|...specifically to the moral sphere not concerned with the ''general'' relation between actions and their consequences, but rather with the moral quality of actions and their consequences, such as the pain and pleasure and good or bad experiences for the doer of the act.{{sfn|Reichenbach|1990|p=1}}}}

Good moral actions lead to wholesome rebirths, and bad moral actions lead to unwholesome rebirths.{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=712}}<!---START OF NOTE--->{{refn|group=quote|Karma and samsara:
* Peter Harvey: "The movement of beings between rebirths is not a haphazard process but is ordered and governed by the law of karma, the principle that beings are reborn according to the nature and quality of their past actions; they are 'heir' to their actions (M.III.123)."{{sfn|Harvey|1990|p=39}} * Peter Harvey: "The movement of beings between rebirths is not a haphazard process but is ordered and governed by the law of karma, the principle that beings are reborn according to the nature and quality of their past actions; they are 'heir' to their actions (M.III.123)."{{sfn|Harvey|1990|p=39}}
* Damien Keown: "In the cosmology , karma functions as the elevator that takes people from one floor of the building to another. Good deeds result in an upward movement and bad deeds in a downward one. Karma is not a system of rewards and punishments meted out by God but a kind of natural law akin to the law of gravity. Individuals are thus the sole authors of their good and bad fortune."{{sfn|Keown|2000|loc=Kindle Location 794-797}} * Damien Keown: "In the cosmology , karma functions as the elevator that takes people from one floor of the building to another. Good deeds result in an upward movement and bad deeds in a downward one. Karma is not a system of rewards and punishments meted out by God but a kind of natural law akin to the law of gravity. Individuals are thus the sole authors of their good and bad fortune."{{sfn|Keown|2000|loc=Kindle Location 794-797}}
* Alexander Berzin: "In short, the external and internal cycles of time delineate samsara – uncontrollably recurring rebirth, fraught with problems and difficulties. These cycles are driven by impulses of energy, known in the Kalachakra system as "winds of karma." Karma is a force intimately connected with mind and arises due to confusion about reality."<ref group=web name=berzin1>Alexander Berzin, </ref> * Alexander Berzin: "In short, the external and internal cycles of time delineate samsara – uncontrollably recurring rebirth, fraught with problems and difficulties. These cycles are driven by impulses of energy, known in the Kalachakra system as "winds of karma." Karma is a force intimately connected with mind and arises due to confusion about reality."<ref group=web name=berzin1>Alexander Berzin, </ref>
* Paul Williams: "All rebirth is due to karman and is impermanent. Short of attaining enlightenment, in each rebirth one is born and dies, to be reborn elsewhere in accordance with the completely impersonal causal nature of one's own karman. The endless cycle of birth, rebirth, and redeath, is samsara." {{sfn|Williams|2002|p=74}} * Paul Williams: "All rebirth is due to karman and is impermanent. Short of attaining enlightenment, in each rebirth one is born and dies, to be reborn elsewhere in accordance with the completely impersonal causal nature of one's own karman. The endless cycle of birth, rebirth, and redeath, is samsara." {{sfn|Williams|2002|p=74}}}}<!---END OF NOTE---><!---START OF NOTE--->{{refn|group=quote|Wholesome and unwholesome actions:
* Ringu Tulku: "We create in three different ways, through actions that are positive, negative, or neutral. When we feel kindness and love and with this attitude do good things, which are beneficial to both ourselves and others, this is positive action. When we commit harmful deeds out of equally harmful intentions, this is negative action. Finally, when our motivation is indifferent and our deeds are neither harmful or beneficial, this is neutral action. The results we experience will accord with the quality of our actions."{{sfn|Ringu Tulku|2005|p=31}}
* Rupert Gethin: "What determines in which realm a being is born? The short answer is karma (Pali kamma): a being’s intentional ‘actions’ of body, speech, and mind—whatever is done, said, or even just thought with definite intention or volition. In general, though with some qualification, rebirth in the lower realms is considered to be the result of relatively unwholesome (akuśala/akusala), or bad (pāpa) karma, while rebirth in the higher realms the result of relatively wholesome (kuśala/kusala), or good (puṇya/puñña) karma."{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=119}}}} In the Buddhist view, a proper understanding of samsara will lead one to have compassion for all beings, including ourselves, who are trapped in this cycle of birth and death.<ref group=web name=chodron1>Thubten Chodron (1993). </ref>}}
* Gethin: ebirth in the lower realms is considered to be the result of relatively unwholesome (akuśala/akusala), or bad (pāpa) karma, while rebirth in the higher realms the result of relatively wholesome (kuśala/kusala), or good (puṇya/puñña) karma.{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=119}}}}<!---END OF NOTE---> The main factor is how they contribute to the well-being of others in a positive or negative sense.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=84}} Especially ''dāna'', giving to the Buddhist order, became an increasingly important source of positive ''karma''.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=85}}


How these intentional actions lead to rebirth, and how the idea of rebirth is to be reconciled with the doctrines of ] and ],{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}{{refn|group=quote|Dargray: "When understanding of karma is correlated to the Buddhist doctrine of universal impermanence and No-Self, a serious problem arises as to where this trace is stored and what the trace left is. The problem is aggravated when the trace remains latent over a long period, perhaps over a period of many existences. The crucial problem presented to all schools of Buddhist philosophy was where the trace is stored and how it can remain in the ever-changing stream of phenomena which build up the individual and what the nature of this trace is."{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}}} is a matter of philosophical inquiry in the Buddhist traditions, for which several solutions have been proposed.{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=712}} In early Buddhism no explicit theory of rebirth and karma is worked out,{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}} and "the karma doctrine may have been incidental to early Buddhist ]."{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986|pp=206-207}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=13}} In early Buddhism, rebirth is ascribed to craving or ignorance.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxi}}{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=416}}
The cause for our rebirth in samsara are the '']'' (disturbing emotions) that lead to the creation of ''karmic results''. If we can overcome our ''kleshas'', then we will no longer generate the ''karmic results'' that leads to rebirth in the six realms.<ref group=web name=chodron1/> The '']'' provide a detailed example of how karma works. They illustrate how the disturbing emotions (]) lead to the creation of karma, which leads to rebirth in ]. In this way, the ''twelve links'' present the process of karmic action and result in detail.{{sfn|Dalai Lama|1992|p=8}}{{sfn|Sonam Rinchen|2006|p=8-9}} By contemplating on the twelve links, one gains greater insight into the workings of karma; this insight enables us to begin to unravel our habitual way of thinking and reacting.{{sfn|Thrangu Rinpoche|2001|pp=3,32}}{{sfn|Simmer-Brown|1987|p=24}}{{sfn|Goodman|1992|p=Kindle Location 1492}}


In later Buddhism, the basic idea is that ''intentional'' actions,{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=52, note 8}} driven by '']'' ("disturbing emotions"),<ref group=web name=chodron1>Thubten Chodron (1993). </ref> '']'' ("volition"),{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998}} or '']'' ("thirst", "craving"){{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=12}} create ],<ref group=web name="Bowker" />{{refn|group=note|See also ]}} ]<ref group=web name="Bowker">{{Cite web|url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/eastern-religions/hinduism/karma |title=Karma &#124; Encyclopedia.com|website=www.encyclopedia.com}}</ref> or ] in the mind. These impressions, or "seeds", will ripen into a future ] or ].{{sfn|Harvey|1990|p=40}}{{refn|group=quote|Seed and fruit:
Karma is part of interdependent origination ('']''), which states that all phenomena arise due to multiple causes and conditions. Karmic action and result is a specific application of this greater principle that applies specifically to the ] actions of ].{{sfn|Dalai Lama|1998|pp=74-75}}{{sfn|Geshe Tashi Tsering|2005|p=1186-1201}}
* Peter Harvey: "Karma is often likened to a seed, and the two words for karmic result, '']'' and '']'', respectively mean 'ripening' and 'fruit'. An action is thus like a seed which will sooner or later, as part of its natural maturation process, result in certain fruits accruing to the doer of the action."{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}
* Ken McLeod: "Karma, then, describes how our actions evolve into experience, internally and externally. Each action is a seed which grows or evolves into our experience of the world. Every action either starts a new growth process or reinforces an old one as described by the ''four results''.<ref group=subnote>In the Tibetan tradition, a karmic action grows into four results: the result of full ripening, the result from what happened, the result from what acted, and the environmental result.</ref><ref group=web name=McLeod>, Ken McLeod</ref>}}<ref group=note>For ''bīja'', see also ]</ref> If we can overcome our ''kleshas'', then we break the ] that leads to rebirth in the six realms.<ref group=web name=chodron1/> The '']'' provides a theoretical framework, explaining how the ] lead to rebirth in '']''.{{sfn|Schumann|1997|pp=88–92}}{{refn|group=note|The twelvefold chain as we know it is the result of a gradual development. Shorter versions are also known. According to Schumann, the twelvefold chain may be a combination of three succeeding lives, each one of them shown by some of the samkaras.{{sfn|Schumann|1997|pp=88-92}}}}


===Complex process===
==Development of the concept==
The Buddha's teaching of karma is not strictly deterministic, but incorporated circumstantial factors, unlike that of the ].{{sfn|Kalupahana|1975|p=127}}{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=20}}<ref group=web name="Bhikkhu 2010">{{cite web |translator=Thanissaro Bhikkhu |title=Wings to Awakening: Part I |year=2010 |pages=47–48 |publisher=Metta Forest Monastery |place=Valley Center, CA |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/wings.pdf |website=www.accesstoinsight.org}}</ref>{{refn|group=quote|]: "Unlike the theory of ] — which led the ] and ] to see the relationship between an act and its result as predictable and tit-for-tat — the principle of '']'' makes that relationship inherently complex. The results of kamma experienced at any one point in time come not only from past kamma, but also from present kamma. This means that, although there are general patterns relating habitual acts to corresponding results , there is no set one-for-one, tit-for-tat, relationship between a particular action and its results. Instead, the results are determined by the context of the act, both in terms of actions that preceded or followed it and in terms one’s state of mind at the time of acting or experiencing the result . The feedback loops inherent in ''this/that conditionality'' mean that the working out of any particular cause-effect relationship can be very complex indeed. This explains why the Buddha says in AN 4:77 that the results of kamma are ]. Only a person who has developed the mental range of a Buddha—another imponderable itself—would be able to trace the intricacies of the kammic network. The basic premise of kamma is simple—that skillful intentions lead to favorable results, and unskillful ones to unfavorable results—but the process by which those results work themselves out is so intricate that it cannot be fully mapped. We can compare this with the ], a mathematical set generated by a simple equation, but whose graph is so complex that it will probably never be completely explored."<ref group=subnote>Thanissaro Bhikkhu uses the Pali spelling for karma.</ref><ref group=web name="Bhikkhu 2010"/>}} It is not a rigid and mechanical process, but a flexible, fluid and dynamic process,{{sfn|Harvey|1990|p=42}} and not all present conditions can be ascribed to karma.{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=20}}{{refn|See also (Samyutta Nikaya 36.21), in which the Buddha mentions eight different possible causes from which feelings can arise. Only the eighth cause can be ascribed to karma.{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=20}}|group=note}}{{refn|group=quote| (Samyutta Nikaya 36.21): "So any brahmans & contemplatives who are of the doctrine & view that whatever an individual feels — pleasure, pain, neither-pleasure-nor-pain — is entirely caused by what was done before — slip past what they themselves know, slip past what is agreed on by the world. Therefore I say that those brahmans & contemplatives are wrong."}} There is no set linear relationship between a particular action and its results.<ref group=web name="Bhikkhu 2010"/> The karmic effect of a deed is not determined solely by the deed itself, but also by the nature of the person who commits the deed, and by the circumstances in which it is committed.<ref group=web name="Bhikkhu 2010"/>{{sfn|Kalupahana|1975|p=131}}


Karma is also not the same as "fate" or "predestination".<ref group=web>{{Cite web|title=What Is Karma? |url=https://studybuddhism.com/en/essentials/what-is/what-is-karma |website=studybuddhism.com}}</ref>
===Vedic religion===
Karmic results are not a "judgement" imposed by a God or other all-powerful being, but rather the results of a natural process.{{sfn|Keown|2000|pp=794-796}}{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|p=19}}{{refn|group=quote|Not a system of reward and punishment:
The concept of ''karma'' originated in the ], where it was related to the performance of rituals{{sfn|Samuel|2010}} or the investment in good deeds{{sfn|vetter|1988|p=78}} to ensure the entrance to heaven after death,{{sfn|Samuel|2010}}{{sfn|vetter|1988|p=78}} while other persons go to the underworld.{{sfn|vetter|1988|p=78}}
* Damien Keown: "Karma is not a system of rewards and punishments meted out by God but a kind of natural law akin to the law of gravity. Individuals are thus the sole authors of their good and bad fortune."
* Peter Harvey states:{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}} - "The law of karma is seen as a natural law inherent in the nature of things, like the law of physics. It is not operated by a God, and indeed the gods are themselves under its sway. Good and bad rebirths are not, therefore, seen as "rewards" and "punishments", but as simply the natural results of certain kinds of action."{{sfn|Keown|2000|loc=Kindle loc. 794-796}}
* Dzongsar Khyentse: " is usually understood as a sort of moralistic system of retribution—"bad" karma and "good" karma. But karma is simply a law of cause and effect, not to be confused with morality or ethics. No one, including Buddha, set the fundamental bar for what is negative and what is positive. Any motivation and action that steer us away from such truths as "all compounded things are impermanent" can result in negative consequences, or bad karma. And any action that brings us closer to understanding such truths as "all emotions are pain" can result in positive consequences, or good karma. At the end of the day, it was not for Buddha to judge; only you can truly know the motivation behind your actions."{{sfn|Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse|2012|p=76}}
* Khandro Rinpoche states: "Buddhism is a nontheistic philosophy. We do not believe in a creator but in the causes and conditions that create certain circumstances that then come to fruition. This is called karma. It has nothing to do with judgement; there is no one keeping track of our karma and sending us up above or down below. Karma is simply the ''wholeness'' of a cause, or first action, and its effect, or fruition, which then becomes another cause. In fact, one karmic cause can have many fruitions, all of which can cause thousands more creations. Just as a handful of seed can ripen into a full field of grain, a small amount of karma can generate limitless effects."{{sfn|Khandro Rinpoche|2003|p=95}}
* Walpola Rahula states: "The theory of karma should not be confused with so-called 'moral justice’ or 'reward and punishment’. The idea of moral justice, or reward and punishment, arises out of the conception of a supreme being, a God, who sits in judgment, who is a law-giver and who decides what is right and wrong. The term 'justice’ is ambiguous and dangerous, and in its name more harm than good is done to humanity. The theory of karma is the theory of cause and effect, of action and reaction; it is a natural law, which has nothing to do with the idea of justice or reward and punishment. Every volitional action produces its effects or results. If a good action produces good effects and a bad action bad effects, it is not justice, or reward, or punishment meted out by anybody or any power sitting in judgment on your action, but this is in virtue of its own nature, its own law."{{sfn|Walpola Rahula|2007|loc=Kindle Locations 860-866}}}} Certain experiences in life are the results of previous actions, but our responses to those experiences are not predetermined, although they bear their own fruit in the future.{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=27}}{{refn|group=quote|Rupert Gethin: "From the Buddhist perspective certain experiences in life are indeed the results of previous actions; but our responses to those experiences, whether wished for or unwished for, are not predetermined but represent new actions which in time bear their own fruit in the future. The Buddhist understanding of individual responsibility does not mean that we should never seek or expect another’s assistance in order to better cope with the troubles of life. The belief that one’s broken leg is at one level to be explained as the result of unwholesome actions performed in a previous life does not mean that one should not go to a doctor to have the broken leg set."{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=27}}}} Unjust behaviour may lead to unfavorable circumstances which make it easier to commit more unjust behavior, but nevertheless the freedom not to commit unjust behavior remains.{{sfn|Gethin|1998|pp=153-154}}


===Early Buddhism=== ===Liberation from ''samsāra''===
{{See also|Right view|Parable of the Poisoned Arrow}}
There is no cohesive presentation of karma in the Sutta Pitaka,{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}} which may mean that the doctrine was incidental to the main perspective of early Buddhist soteriology.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}}
Schmithausen is a notable scholar who has questioned whether karma already played a role in the theory of rebirth of earliest Buddhism.{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=13}} According to Schmithausen, "the karma doctrine may have been incidental to early Buddhist soteriology."{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986|p=206-207}}


The real importance of the doctrine of karma and its fruits lies in the recognition of the urgency to put a stop to the whole process.{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|pp=21-22}}{{sfn|Vetter|1988|pp=79-80}} The ''Acintita Sutta'' warns that "the results of kamma" is one of the ],{{sfn|Buswell|Lopez|2013|p=14}}<ref group=web name="Acintita">{{Cite web |url=https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.077.than.html|title=Acintita Sutta: Unconjecturable |website=www.accesstoinsight.org}}</ref> subjects that are beyond all conceptualization{{sfn|Buswell|Lopez|2013|p=14}} and cannot be understood with logical thought or reason.{{refn|group=note|Dasgupta explains that in Indian philosophy, acintya is "that which is to be unavoidably accepted for explaining facts, but which cannot stand the scrutiny of logic."{{sfn|Dasgupta|1991|p=16}} See also the '']'', "Discourse to Vatsagotra on the Fire," Majjhima Nikaya 72,{{sfn|Buswell|Lopez|2013|p=852}}<ref group=web name="MN72">{{Cite web |translator=Thanissaro Bhikkhu |url=https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.072.than.html|title=Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta: To Vacchagotta on Fire |website=www.accesstoinsight.org}}</ref> in which the Buddha is questioned by Vatsagotra on the "ten indeterminate question,"{{sfn|Buswell|Lopez|2013|p=852}} and the Buddha explains that a ] is like a fire that has been extinguished, and is "deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea".<ref group=web name="MN72"/>}}
According to Vetter, the Buddha at first sought "the deathless" (''amata/amrta''), which is concerned with the here and now. Only after this realization did he become acquanted with the doctirne of rebirth.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=3}} Bronkhorst disagrees, and concludes that the Buddha "introduced a concept of karma that differed considerably from the commonly held views of his time."{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=16}} According to Bronkhorst, not physical and mental activities as such were seen as responsible for rebirth, but intentions and desire.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=14}}


According to Gombrich, this sutra may have been a warning against the tendency, "probably from the Buddha's day until now", to understand the doctrine of ''karma'' "backwards", to explain unfavorable conditions in this life when no other explanations are available.{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|pp=20-22}} Gaining a better rebirth may have been,{{sfn|Vetter|1987|pp=50-52}}{{sfn|Vetter|1988|pp=80-82}} and still is, the central goal for many people.{{sfn|Gombrich|1991}}{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=125}} The adoption, by laity, of Buddhist beliefs and practices is seen as a good thing, which brings ] and good rebirth,{{sfn|Collins|1999|p=120}} but does not result in ],{{sfn|Collins|1999|p=120}} and liberation from ''samsāra'', the ultimate goal of the Buddha.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=79}}{{sfn|Gombrich|2009|pp=20-22}}
The doctrine of karma may have been especially important for common people, for whom it was more important to cope with life's immediate demandsw, such as the problems of pain, injustice, and death. The doctrine of karma met these exigencies, and in time it became an important soteriological aim in its own right.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=125}}

===The Three Knowledges===
The understanding of rebirth and the reappearance in accordance wtih one's deeds are the first two knowledges that the Buddha is said to have acquired at his enlightenment. According to the Buddhist tradition, the Buddha gained full and complete insight into the workings of karma at the time of his enlightenment.{{sfn|Goldstein|2011|p=74}}}} According to Bronkhorst, these knowledges are later additions to the story,{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}} just like the notion of "liberating insight" itself.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}} According to Tilmann Vetter, originally only the practice of dhyana, and the resulting calming of the mind may have constituted the liberating practice of the Buddha.{{sfn|Vetter|1988}}

===Later development===
According to Vetter, probably in the first centuries after the Buddha's death the following
ideas were introduced or became important:{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=87}}
# all evil deeds must be requited or at least be superseded by good deeds before a person can become released,
# pleasant and unpleasant feelings in a human existence are the result of former deeds,
# evil behavior and its results form a vicious circle from which one can hardly escape,
# Gotama could become Buddha because he did good deeds through countless former lives, devoting their result to the aim of enlightenment,
# by confession and repentance one can (partly) annul an evil deed,
# evil deeds of non-Arhats (as to Arhats see point 1) can be superseded by great merits,
# one can and should transfer merit to others, especially for their spiritual development.


==Within the Pali suttas== ==Within the Pali suttas==

===Karma and rebirth===
{{See also|Anatta#Anatta and moral responsibility|l1=Anatta and moral responsibility}} {{See also|Anatta#Anatta and moral responsibility|l1=Anatta and moral responsibility}}


According to the Buddhist tradition, the lord Buddha gained full and complete insight into the workings of karma at the time of his enlightenment.{{sfn|Goldstein|2011|p=74}}{{refn|group=note|The understanding of rebirth, and the reappearance in accordance with one's deeds, are the first two knowledges that the Buddha is said to have acquired at his enlightenment, as described in Majjhima Nikaya 36.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}}}} According to Bronkhorst, these knowledges are later additions to the story,{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}} just like the notion of "liberating insight" itself.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}}{{Refn|group=note|Bronkhorst is following Schmithausen, who, in his often-cited article ''On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism'', notes that the mention of the four noble truths as constituting "liberating insight", which is attained after mastering the Rupa Jhanas, is a later addition to texts such as Majjhima Nikaya 36.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}}{{sfn|Vetter|1988}}{{sfn|Schmithausen |Wezler |Bruhn |Alsdorf |1981}}<!--SFN for best guess--> It calls in question the reliability of these accounts, and the relation between ''dhyana'' and insight, which is a core problem in the study of early Buddhism.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993}}{{sfn|Vetter|1988}}{{sfn|Gombrich|1997}} According to Tilmann Vetter, originally only the practice of dhyana, and the resulting calming of the mind may have constituted the liberating practice of the lord Buddha.{{sfn|Vetter|1988}}}}
The ''Cūlakammavibhanga Sutta'' ("The Shorter Exposition of Action," ] 3.203) describes the types of rebirth that various kinds of actions produce. For example, negative actions such as killing lead to rebirths in the lower realms (such as the hell realm), and virtuous action such as gracious behavior under duress leads to rebirth in the human or other higher realms.<ref>MN.3.203, Bodhi pg 1053, 1055</ref>

The ''Mahākammavibhanga Sutta'' ("The Greater Exposition of Action," MN.3.208) is a similar exposition, with the additional stipulation that other rebirths may intervene between the time of the virtuous or non-virtuous actions and the rebirth that they impel.<ref>MN.3.203, Bodhi pg 1058-1065</ref>


In AN 5.292, the lord Buddha asserted that it is not possible to avoid experiencing the result of a karmic deed once it has been committed.{{sfn|McDermott|1980|p=175}}
===Inevitability of results===
In AN 5.292, the Buddha asserted that it is not possible to avoid experiencing the result of a karmic deed once it's been committed.{{sfn|McDermott|1980|p=175}}


In the ], it is stated that karmic results are experienced either in this life (P. ''diṭṭadhammika'') or in a future lives (P. ''samparāyika'').{{sfn|McDermott|1984|p=21}} The former may involve a readily observable connection between action and karmic consequence, such as when a thief is captured and tortured by the authorities,{{sfn|McDermott|1984|p=21}} but the connection need not necessarily be that obvious and in fact usually is not observable. In the ], it is stated that karmic results are experienced either in this life (P. ''diṭṭadhammika'') or in future lives (P. ''samparāyika'').{{sfn|McDermott|1984|p=21}} The former may involve a readily observable connection between action and karmic consequence, such as when a thief is captured and tortured by the authorities,{{sfn|McDermott|1984|p=21}} but the connection need not necessarily be that obvious and in fact usually is not observable.


The Sammyutta Nikaya makes a basic distinction between past karma (P. ''purānakamma'') which has already been incurred, and karma being created in the present (P. ''navakamma'').<ref>SN.4.132</ref> Therefore in the present one both creates new karma (P. ''navakamma'') and encounters the result of past karma (P. ''kammavipāka''). Karma in the early canon is also threefold: Mental action (S. ''manaḥkarman''), bodily action (S. ''kāyakarman'') and vocal action (S. ''vākkarman'').{{sfn|Lamotte|2001|p=18}} The Samyutta Nikaya makes a basic distinction between past karma (P. ''purānakamma'') which has already been incurred, and karma being created in the present (P. ''navakamma'').<ref>SN.4.132</ref> Therefore, in the present one both creates new karma (P. ''navakamma'') and encounters the result of past karma (P. ''kammavipāka''). Karma in the early canon is also threefold: Mental action (S. ''manaḥkarman''), bodily action (S. ''kāyakarman'') and vocal action (S. ''vākkarman'').{{sfn|Lamotte|2001|p=18}}


==Within Buddhist traditions== ==Within Buddhist traditions==
{{See also|Development of Karma in Buddhism}}
Various Buddhist philosophical schools developed within Buddhism, giving various interpretations regarding more refined points of karma. A major problem is the relation between the doctrine of no-self, and the "storage" of the traces of one's deeds,{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}} for which various solutions have been offered.


===Early Indian Buddhism=== ===Early Indian Buddhism===
As the earliest Buddhist philosophical schools developed with the rise of ] Buddhism, various interpretations developed regarding more refined points of karma. A main problem as the relation between the doctrine of no-self, and the continuation of the results of one's deeds:{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}
{{quote|When understanding of karma is correlated to the Buddhist doctrine of universal impermanence and No-Self, a serious problem arises as to where this trace is stored and what the trace left is. The problem is aggravated when the trace remains latent over a long period, perhaps over a period of many existences. The crucial problem presented to all schools of Buddhist philosophy was where the trace is stored and how it can remain in the ever-changing stream of phenomena which build up the individual and what the nature of this trace is.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}}}


====Origins====
Various solutions were offered:{{sfn|Dowling|2006|p=85}}
The concept of ''karma'' originated in the ], where it was related to the performance of rituals{{sfn|Samuel|2010}} or the investment in good deeds{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=78}} to ensure the entrance to heaven after death,{{sfn|Samuel|2010}}{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=78}} while other persons go to the underworld.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=78}}
* Sammitīya — the ''avipranāśa'' or 'indestructible', a dharma of the ''citta-viprayukta'' class

* Sarvāstivādin/Vaibhāṣika tradition — ''prāpti'' and ''aprāpti'' or adhesion and non-adhesion, and the ''avijñapti·rūpa'' or form that does not indicate.
====Pre-sectarian Buddhism====
* Sautrāntika tradition — the bīja or seed, the ''ekarasa-skandha'' or aggregate of unique essence, the ''mulāntika-skandha'' or proximate root aggregate and the ''paramārtha-pudgala''.
{{Main|Pre-sectarian Buddhism}}
* Yogācāra/Vijñānavādin tradition — the ālaya-vijñāna or store house' consciousness.
The concept of karma may have been of minor importance in early Buddhism.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}}{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986}} Schmithausen has questioned whether karma already played a role in the theory of rebirth of earliest Buddhism,{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=13}} noting that "the karma doctrine may have been incidental to early Buddhist soteriology."{{sfn|Schmithausen|1986|pp=206-207}} Langer notes that originally karma may have been only one of several concepts connected with rebirth.{{sfn|Langer|2007|p=26}}{{refn|group=note|Langer: "When I was searching the Sanskrit texts for material, two things become apparent: first, rebirth, central as it is to Indian philosophy, is not found in the earliest texts; and second, rebirth and karman do not appear to be linked together from the beginning. In fact, originally karman seems to have been only one of several concepts connected with rebirth, but in the course of time it proved to be more popular than others. One of these ‘other concepts’ linked with rebirth is a curious notion of ‘rebirth according to one’s wish’, sometimes referred to in the texts as kAmacAra. The wish — variously referred to in the texts as kAma or kratu — is directed to a particular form or place of rebirth and can be spontaneous (at the time of death) or cultivated for a long time. This understanding seems to have some affinity with the Buddhist notion that a mental effort, a positive state of mind, can bring about a good rebirth."{{sfn|Langer|2007|p=26}}}} Tillman Vetter notes that in early Buddhism rebirth is ascribed to craving or ignorance.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxi}} Buswell too notes that "Early Buddhism does not identify bodily and mental motion, but desire (or thirst, ''trsna''), as the cause of karmic consequences."{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=416}} Matthews notes that "there is no single major systematic exposition" on the subject of karma and "an account has to be put together from the dozens of places where karma is mentioned in the texts,"{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}} which may mean that the doctrine was incidental to the main perspective of early Buddhist soteriology.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=124}}

According to Vetter, "the Buddha at first sought, and realized, ] (''amata/amrta''{{refn|group=note|Stanislaw Schayer, a Polish scholar, argued in the 1930s that the Nikayas preserve elements of an archaic form of Buddhism which is close to Brahmanical beliefs,{{sfnm|1a1=Lindtner|1y=1997|1p= |2a1=Lindtner|2y=1999|2p= |3a1=Akizuki|3y=1990|3pp=25-27 |4a1=Ray|4y=1999|4p={{page needed|date=September 2023}}}} and survived in the Mahayana tradition.{{sfn|Reat|1998|p=xi}}{{sfn|Conze|1967|p=10}} According to Schayer, one of these elements is that Nirvana was conceived as the attainment of immortality, and the gaining of a deathless sphere from which there would be no falling back.{{sfn|Ray|1999|pp=374-377}} According to Falk, in the precanonical tradition, there is a threefold division of reality, the third realm being the realm of nirvana, the "amrta sphere," characterized by prajna. This nirvana is an "abode" or "place" which is gained by the enlightened holy man.{{sfn|Ray|1999|p=375}} According to Falk, this scheme is reflected in the precanonical conception of the path to liberation.{{sfn|Ray|1999|p=375}} The nirvanic element, as an "essence" or pure consciousness, is immanent within samsara. The three bodies are concentric realities, which are stripped away or abandoned, leaving only the nirodhakaya of the liberated person.{{sfn|Ray|1999|p=375}} See also Rita Langer (2007), ''Buddhist Rituals of Death and Rebirth: Contemporary Sri Lankan Practice and Its Origins'', p.26-28, on "redeath" (''punarmrtyu'').{{sfn|Langer|2007|pp=26-28}}}}), which is concerned with the here and now.{{refn|group=note|Tilmann Vetter, ''Das Erwachen des Buddha'', referenced by Bronkhorst.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=3}}}} Only after this realization did he become acquainted with the doctrine of rebirth."{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=3}} Bronkhorst disagrees, and concludes that the Buddha "introduced a concept of karma that differed considerably from the commonly held views of his time."{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=16}} According to Bronkhorst, not physical and mental activities as such were seen as responsible for rebirth, but intentions and desire.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1998|p=14}}

The doctrine of karma may have been especially important for common people, for whom it was more important to cope with life's immediate demands, such as the problems of pain, injustice, and death. The doctrine of karma met these exigencies, and in time it became an important soteriological aim in its own right.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=125}}


====Vaibhāṣika-Sarvāstivādin tradition==== ====Vaibhāṣika-Sarvāstivādin tradition====
{{see also|Vaibhāṣika|Sarvastivada}} {{see also|Vaibhāṣika|Sarvastivada}}


The Vaibhāśika-Sarvāstivāda was widely influential in India and beyond: "the understanding of karma in the Sarvāstivāda in turn became normative not only for Buddhism in India but also for it in other countries."{{sfn|Ryose|1987|p=3}} The Vaibhāśika-Sarvāstivāda was widely influential in India and beyond. Their understanding of karma in the Sarvāstivāda became normative for Buddhism in India and other countries.{{sfn|Ryose|1987|p=3}} According to Dennis Hirota,
{{blockquote|Sarvastivadins argued that there exists a dharma of "possession" (''prapti''), which functions with all karmic acts, so that each act or thought, though immediately passing away, creates the "possession" of that act in the continuum of instants we experience as a person. This possession itself is momentary, but continually reproduces a similar possession in the succeeding instant, even though the original act lies in the past. Through such continual regeneration, the act is "possessed" until the actualization of the result.{{sfn|Hirota|2004|p=5100}}}}


The ''Abhidharmahṛdaya'' by Dharmaśrī was the first systematic exposition of Vaibhāśika-Sarvāstivāda doctrine, and the third chapter, the ''Karma-varga'', deals with the concept of karma systematically.{{sfn|Ryose|1987|pp=3-4}} The ''Abhidharmahṛdaya'' by Dharmaśrī was the first systematic exposition of Vaibhāśika-Sarvāstivāda doctrine, and the third chapter, the ''Karma-varga'', deals with the concept of karma systematically.{{sfn|Ryose|1987|pp=3-4}}


Another important exposition, the '']'', gives three definitions of karma: Another important exposition, the '']'', gives three definitions of karma:
1) action; karma is here supplanted in the text by the synonyms ''kriya'' or ''karitra'', both of which mean "activity"; # action; karma is here supplanted in the text by the synonyms ''kriya'' or ''karitra'', both of which mean "activity";
2) formal vinaya conduct; # formal vinaya conduct;
3) human action as the agent of various effects; karma as that which links certain actions with certain effects, is the primary concern of the exposition.{{sfn|Ryose|1987|pp=39-40}} # human action as the agent of various effects; karma as that which links certain actions with certain effects, is the primary concern of the exposition.{{sfn|Ryose|1987|pp=39-40}}


The 4th century philosopher ] compiled the '']'', an extensive compendium which elaborated the positions of the ]-] school on a wide range of issues raised by the early sutras. Chapter four the Kośa is devoted to a study of karma, and chapters two and five contain formulation as to the mechanism of fruition and retribution.{{sfn|Lamotte|2001|p=18}} This became the main source of understanding of the perspective of early Buddhism for later Mahāyāna philosophers.{{sfn|Lamotte|2001}} The 4th century philosopher ] compiled the '']'', an extensive compendium which elaborated the positions of the ]-] school on a wide range of issues raised by the early sutras. Chapter four of the Kośa is devoted to a study of karma, and chapters two and five contain formulations as to the mechanism of fruition and retribution.{{sfn|Lamotte|2001|p=18}} This became the main source of understanding of the perspective of early Buddhism for later ] philosophers.{{sfn|Lamotte|2001}}


====Dārṣṭāntika-Sautrāntika==== ====Dārṣṭāntika-Sautrāntika====
The Dārṣṭāntika-] school pioneered the idea of karmic seeds (S. ''bija'') and "the special modification of the psycho-physical series" (S. ''saṃtatipaṇāmaviśeṣa'') to explain the workings of karma.{{sfn|Park|2007|pp=234-236}} The Dārṣṭāntika-] school pioneered the idea of karmic seeds (S. '']'') and "the special modification of the psycho-physical series" (S. ''saṃtatipaṇāmaviśeṣa'') to explain the workings of karma.{{sfn|Park|2007|pp=234-236}} According to Dennis Hirota,
{{blockquote|he Sautrantikas insisted that each act exists only in the present instant and perishes immediately. To explain causation, they taught that with each karmic act a "perfuming" occurs which, though not a dharma or existent factor itself, leaves a residual impression in the succeeding series of mental instants, causing it to undergo a process of subtle evolution eventually leading to the act’s result. Good and bad deeds performed are thus said to leave "seeds" or traces of disposition that will come to fruition.{{sfn|Hirota|2004|p=5100}}}}

===Theravādin tradition===

====Canonical texts====
In the ] and commentarial traditions, karma is taken up at length. The ''Abhidhamma Sangaha'' of Anuruddhācariya offers a treatment of the topic, with an exhaustive treatment in book five (5.3.7).{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=132}}


The '']'', which discusses a number of controverted points related either directly or indirectly to the notion of kamma."{{sfn|McDermott|1975|p=424}} This involved debate with the ] school, which postulated the provisional existence of the person (S. ''pudgala'', P. ''puggala'') to account for the ripening of karmic effects over time.{{sfn|McDermott|1975|p=424}} The Kathāvatthu also records debate by the Theravādins with the Andhakas (who may have been ]s) regarding whether or not old age and death are the result (''vipāka'') of karma.{{sfn|McDermott|1975|pp=426-427}} The Theravāda maintained that they are not—not, apparently because there is no causal relation between the two, but because they wished to reserve the term ''vipāka'' strictly for mental results--"subjective phenomena arising through the effects of kamma."{{sfn|McDermott|1975|pp=426-427}}
====Theravādin tradition====
In the Theravāda Abhidhamma and commentarial traditions, karma is taken up at length. The ''Abhidhamma Sangaha'' of Anuruddhācariya offers a treatment of the topic, with an exhaustive treatment in book five (5.3.7).{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=132}} The '']'', which discusses a number of controverted points related either directly or indirectly to the notion of kamma."{{sfn|McDermott|1975|p=424}} This involved debate with the ] school, which postulated the provisional existence of the person (S. ''pudgala'', P. ''puggala'') to account for the ripening of karmic effects over time.{{sfn|McDermott|1975|p=424}} The Kathāvatthu also records debate by the Theravādins with the Andhakas (who may have been ]s) regarding whether or not old age and death are the result (''vipāka'') of karma.{{sfn|McDermott|1975|pp=426-427}} The Theravāda maintained that they are not—not, apparently because there is no causal relation between the two, but because they wished to reserve the term ''vipāka'' strictly for mental results--"subjective phenomena arising through the effects of kamma."{{sfn|McDermott|1975|pp=426-427}}


In the canonical Theravāda view of kamma, "the belief that deeds done or ideas seized at the moment of death are particularly significant."{{sfn|McDermott|1980|p=168}} In the canonical Theravāda view of kamma, "the belief that deeds done or ideas seized at the moment of death are particularly significant."{{sfn|McDermott|1980|p=168}}


====The Milindapañha and Petavatthu==== ====Transfer of merit====
{{Main|Transfer of merit}}
The '']'', a ], offers some interpretations of karma theory at variance with the orthodox position.{{sfn|McDermott|1984|p=110}} In particular, ] allows for the possibility of the transfer of merit to humans and one of the four classes of ], perhaps in deference to folk belief (see below, ]).{{sfn|McDermott|1984|pp=109-111}} Nāgasena makes it clear that demerit cannot be transferred.{{sfn|McDermott|1977|p=463}} One scholar asserts that the sharing of merit "can be linked to the Vedic ''śrāddha'', for it was Buddhist practice not to upset existing traditions when well-established custom was not antithetic to Buddhist teaching."{{sfn|McDermott|1977|p=462}}
The '']'', a ], offers some interpretations of karma theory at variance with the orthodox position.{{sfn|McDermott|1984|p=110}} In particular, ] allows for the possibility of the transfer of merit to humans and one of the four classes of ], perhaps in deference to folk belief.{{sfn|McDermott|1984|pp=109-111}} Nāgasena makes it clear that demerit cannot be transferred.{{sfn|McDermott|1977|p=463}} One scholar asserts that the sharing of merit "can be linked to the Vedic ''śrāddha'', for it was Buddhist practice not to upset existing traditions when well-established custom was not antithetic to Buddhist teaching."{{sfn|McDermott|1977|p=462}}


The ], which is fully canonical, endorses the transfer of merit even more widely, including the possibility of sharing merit with all petas.{{sfn|McDermott|1984|pp=109-111}} The ], which is fully canonical, endorses the transfer of merit even more widely, including the possibility of sharing merit with all petas.{{sfn|McDermott|1984|pp=109-111}}
Line 145: Line 168:


====Indian Yogācāra tradition==== ====Indian Yogācāra tradition====
In the Yogācāra philosophical tradition, one of the two principal Mahāyāna schools, the principle of karma was extended considerably. In the Yogācāra formulation, all experience without exception is said to result from the ripening of karma.{{sfn|Harvey|2000|p=297}}<ref group=web>, Harvey</ref> Karmic seeds (S. ''bija'') are said to be stored in the "storehouse consciousness" (S. '']'') until such time as they ripen into experience. The term ''vāsāna'' ("perfuming") is also used, and Yogācārins debated whether vāsāna and bija were essentially the same, the seeds were the effect of the perfuming, or whether the perfuming simply affected the seeds.{{sfn|Lusthaus|2002|p=194}} The seemingly external world is merely a "by-product" (''adhipati-phala'') of karma. The conditioning of the mind resulting from karma is called '']''.{{sfn|Lusthaus|2002|p=48}}<ref group=web></ref> In the ] philosophical tradition, one of the two principal Mahāyāna schools, the principle of karma was extended considerably. In the Yogācāra formulation, all experience without exception is said to result from the ripening of karma.{{sfn|Harvey|2000|p=}} Karmic seeds (S. ''bija'') are said to be stored in the "storehouse consciousness" (S. '']'') until such time as they ripen into experience. The term ''vāsāna'' ("perfuming") is also used, and Yogācārins debated whether vāsāna and bija were essentially the same, the seeds were the effect of the perfuming, or whether the perfuming simply affected the seeds.{{sfn|Lusthaus|2002|p=194}} The seemingly external world is merely a "by-product" (''adhipati-phala'') of karma. The conditioning of the mind resulting from karma is called '']''.{{sfn|Lusthaus|2002|p=48}}
The ''Treatise on Action'' (''Karmasiddhiprakaraṇa''), also by Vasubandhu, treats the subject of karma in detail from the Yogācāra perspective.{{sfn|Lamotte|2001|pp=13,35}} According to scholar Dan Lusthaus,
{{blockquote|Vasubandhu's ''Viṃśatikā'' (''Twenty Verses'') repeatedly emphasizes in a variety of ways that karma is intersubjective and that the course of each and every stream of consciousness (''vijñāna-santāna'', i.e., the changing individual) is profoundly influenced by its relations with other consciousness streams.{{sfn|Lusthaus|2002|p=48}}}}


According to Bronkhorst, whereas in earlier systems it "was not clear how a series of completely mental events (the deed and its traces) could give rise to non-mental, material effects," with the (purported) idealism of the Yogācāra system this is not an issue.{{sfn|Bronkhorst|2000}}
The ''Treatise on Action'' (''Karmasiddhiprakaraṇa''), also by Vasubandhu, treats the subject of karma in detail from the Yogācāra perspective.{{sfn|Lamotte|2001|pp=13,35}} According to scholar Dan Lusthaus, "Vasubandhu's ''Viṃśatikā'' (''Twenty Verses'') repeatedly emphasizes in a variety of ways that karma is intersubjective and that the course of each and every stream of consciousness (''vijñāna-santāna'', i.e., the changing individual) is profoundly influenced by its relations with other consciousness streams."{{sfn|Lusthaus|2002|p=48}}

As one scholar argues, whereas in earlier systems it "was not clear how a series of completely mental events (the deed and its traces) could give rise to non-mental, material effects," with the (purported) idealism of the Yogācāra system this is not an issue.<ref>Bronkhorst J, ''Karma and Teleology: A Problem and its Solutions in Indian Philosophy''. The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies, Tokyo, 2000. pg <sup></sup></ref>


In Mahāyāna traditions, karma is not the sole basis of rebirth. The ] of ]s after the seventh stage (S. '']'') are said to be consciously directed for the benefit of others still trapped in {{IAST|saṃsāra}}.{{sfn|Harvey|2000|p=130}} Thus, theirs are not uncontrolled rebirths.{{sfn|Harvey|2000|p=130}} In Mahāyāna traditions, karma is not the sole basis of rebirth. The ] of ]s after the seventh stage (S. '']'') are said to be consciously directed for the benefit of others still trapped in {{IAST|saṃsāra}}.{{sfn|Harvey|2000|p=130}} Thus, theirs are not uncontrolled rebirths.{{sfn|Harvey|2000|p=130}}
Line 155: Line 178:
====Mādhyamaka philosophy==== ====Mādhyamaka philosophy====
] articulated the difficulty in forming a karma theory in his most prominent work, the '']'' (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way): ] articulated the difficulty in forming a karma theory in his most prominent work, the '']'' (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way):
{{quote|If (the act) lasted till the time of ripening, (the act) would be eternal. If (the act) were terminated, how could the terminated produce a fruit?{{refn|group=note|MMK (XVII.6), cited in Dargyay, 1986, p.170{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}}}}} {{blockquote|text=If (the act) lasted till the time of ripening, (the act) would be eternal. If (the act) were terminated, how could the terminated produce a fruit? {{refn|group=subnote|MMK (XVII.6), cited in Dargyay, 1986, p.170{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}}}}}


The ''Mūlamadhyamakavṛtty-Akutobhayā'', also generally attributed to Nāgārjuna,<ref>''The "Akutobhaya" and early Indian Madhyamika (Volumes I and II) (Buddhism, India, China, Tibet)'' by Huntington, Clair W., Jr. Ph.D. thesis. University of Michigan: 1986 pg 4</ref> concludes that it is impossible both for the act to persist somehow and also for it to perish immediately and still have efficacy at a later time.{{refn|group=note|''Mūlamadhyamakavṛtty-Akutobhayā'', sDe dge Tibetan Tripi!aka (Tokyo, 1977) pp. 32, 4.5, cited in Dargyay, 1986, p.170.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}} }} The ''Mūlamadhyamakavṛtty-Akutobhayā'', also generally attributed to Nāgārjuna,{{sfn|Huntington|1986|p=4}} concludes that it is impossible both for the act to persist somehow and also for it to perish immediately and still have efficacy at a later time.{{refn|group=note|''Mūlamadhyamakavṛtty-Akutobhayā'', sDe dge Tibetan Tripitaka (Tokyo, 1977) pp. 32, 4.5, cited in Dargyay, 1986, p.170.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=170}}}}


====Tibetan Buddhism====
] schools deriving from Nāgārjuna subsequently took one of two approaches to the problem. The ]-Mādhyamaka generally borrowed the philosophy of karma from the Yogācāra. The ]-Mādhyamaka refuted every concept of a support for ongoing karmic efficacy, while nevertheless postulating that a potential (T. ''nus pa'') is formed which substantiates whenever the situation is ripe.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=172}} ], the definitive exponent of Prāsaṅgika, argued that because this potential is not a thing, that is, not an "inherently real phenomenon," it does not need to be supported in any way.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=172}} One scholar argues that "in India, the Prāsaṅgikas' various viewpoints of karma were never organized into a coherent and convincing system."{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=172}}
{{Main|Karma in Tibetan Buddhism}}


In Tibetan Buddhism, the teachings on karma belong to the preliminary teachings, that turn the mind towards the Buddhist dharma.{{sfn|Norgay|2014|p=v}}
====Indo-Tibetan tradition====
], the founder of the ] school of Tibetan Buddhism, argued that the Prāsaṅgika position allowed for the postulation of something called an "act's cessation" (''las zhig pal'') which persists and is in fact a substance (''rdzas'' or ''dngos po'', S. ''vastu''), and which explains the connection between cause and result.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=173}} ], an important philosopher of the ] school of Tibetan Buddhism, accused Tsongkhapa of a doctrinal innovation not legitimately grounded in Candrakīrti's work, and one which amounted to little more than a (non-Buddhist) ] concept.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=176}} Gelugpa scholars offered defenses of the idea.{{sfn|Dargyay|1986|p=176}}


In the Vajrayana tradition, negative past karma may be "purified" through such practices as meditation on ] because they both are the mind's psychological phenomenon.{{sfn|Kalu Rinpoche|1993|p=204}}{{sfn|Zopa Rinpoche|2004|p=ix}} The performer of the action, after having purified the karma, does not experience the negative results he or she otherwise would have.{{sfn|Thrangu Rinpoche|2012|pp=20-21}} Engaging in the ten negative actions out of selfishness and delusions hurts all involved. Otherwise, loving others, receives love; whereas; people with closed hearts may be prevented from happiness.{{sfn|Zopa Rinpoche|2004|p=ix}} One good thing about karma is that it can be purified through confession, if the thoughts become positive.{{sfn|Patrul Rinpoche | 2011| pp=264-265}} Within Guru Yoga seven branch offerings practice, confession is the antidote to aversion.
=====Vajrayana tradition=====
In the Vajrayana tradition, it is believed that the effects of negative past karma can be "purified" through such practices as meditation on ].{{sfn|Kalu Rinpoche|1993|p=204}} The performer of the action, after having purified the karma, does not experience the negative results he or she otherwise would have.{{sfn|Thrangu Rinpoche|2012|pp=20-21}}


====East Asian traditions==== ====East Asian traditions====


=====Zen===== =====Zen=====
{{religious text primary|section|reason=You need to confirm the relevance of these quotes by secondary sources, to prove it is not cherry-picking quotes.|date=October 2017}}
] argued in his '']'' that karmic latencies are emphatically not empty, going so far as to claim that belief in the emptiness of karma should be characterized as "non-Buddhist," although he also states that the “law of karman has no concrete existence.”<ref>Dōgen Kigen, Shobogenzo: The Eye and Treasury of the True Law, trans. Kosen Nishiyama and John Stevens, Vol. 1 (Sendai, Japan: Daihokkaikaku Publishing Co., 1975), p. 142 149.</ref>
] argued in his '']'' that karmic latencies are emphatically not empty, going so far as to claim that belief in the emptiness of karma should be characterized as "non-Buddhist," although he also states that the "law of karman has no concrete existence."{{sfn|Dōgen|1975|pp=142, 149}}


Zen's most famous ] about karma is called ] (百丈野狐). The story of the koan is about an ancient Zen teacher whose answer to a question presents a wrong view about karma by saying that the person who has a foundation in cultivating the great practice "does not fall into cause and effect." Because of his unskillful answer the teacher reaps the result of living 500 lives as a wild fox. He is then able to appear as a human and ask the same question to Zen teacher Baizhang, who answers, “He is not in the dark about cause and effect. Hearing this answer the old teacher is freed from the life of a wild fox. The Zen perspective avoids the duality of asserting that an enlightened person is either subject to or free from the law of karma and that the key is not being ignorant about karma. Zen's most famous ] about karma is called ] (百丈野狐). The story of the koan is about an ancient Zen teacher whose answer to a question presents a wrong view about karma by saying that the person who has a foundation in cultivating the great practice "does not fall into cause and effect." Because of his unskillful answer the teacher reaps the result of living 500 lives as a wild fox. He is then able to appear as a human and ask the same question to Zen teacher Baizhang, who answers, "He is not in the dark about cause and effect." Hearing this answer the old teacher is freed from the life of a wild fox. The Zen perspective avoids the duality of asserting that an enlightened person is either subject to or free from the law of karma and that the key is not being ignorant about karma.


=====Tendai===== =====Tendai=====
The Japanese ]/] teacher ] taught a series of ten reflections for a dying person that emphasized reflecting on the ] as a means to purify vast amounts of karma.{{sfn|Lopez|2001|p=239}} The Japanese ]/] teacher ] taught a series of ten reflections for a dying person that emphasized reflecting on the ] as a means to purify vast amounts of karma.{{sfn|Lopez|2001|p=239}}{{relevance inline|date=October 2017}}

===Dedication of merit and rejoicing===
Two common practices within Buddhism are:
* Dedicating (or transferring) merit to others, and
* Rejoicing in other's merit.
These practices are believed to help develop a generous state of mind in the practitioner. Contemporary scholar Rupert Gethin explains:{{sfn|Gethin|1998|pp=109-110}}
:The practice of the transference of merit—the giving of one’s merit—is an ancient and extremely widespread and common Buddhist practice. What it indicates is that spiritual practice is to be entered into in a generous spirit, not for the sake of acquiring merit exclusively for oneself but for the benefit of others too. Indeed, only acts undertaken in this spirit are truly meritorious in the first place. The rejoicing in the merit of others also indicates that, in undertaking meritorious acts, it is one’s state of mind that is crucial: thus if one gives grudgingly, with an ungenerous heart, the auspiciousness of one’s acts is compromised; on the other hand, if one gives nothing at all but is deeply moved by another’s act of generosity, then that in itself is an auspicious occasion, an act of merit. Thus for many Buddhists it is customary at the end of Buddhist devotions and rituals to offer the merit generated during the ceremony for the benefit of other beings—either specific beings such as dead relatives, or all sentient beings—and in so doing to invite all present (whether they have directly participated in the ceremony or not, whether they have physical presence or are unseen ghosts or gods) also to rejoice in the merit of the ceremony.

====Scholarly debate====
Initially in the Western study of Buddhism, some scholars believed that the transfer of merit was at first a uniquely Mahāyāna practice and that it was developed only at a late period, perceiving that it was somewhat discordant with early Buddhist understandings of karma theory.{{sfn|Bechert|1992|loc=note 34, pp. 99-100}} Scholar Heinz Bechert dates the Buddhist doctrine of transfer of merit (Sanskrit: ''puṇyapariṇāmanā'') in its fully developed form to the period between the 5th and 7th centuries CE.{{sfn|Bechert|1992|loc=note 34, pp. 99-100}} However, Sree Padma and Anthony Barber note that merit transfer was well established and a very integral part of Buddhist practice in the ] region of southern India.{{sfn|Padma|Barber|2009|p=116}} In addition, inscriptions at numerous sites across South Asia provide definitive evidence that the transfer of merit was widely practiced in the first few centuries CE.<ref>Fogelin, Lars. ''Archaeology of Early Buddhism.'' 2006. p. 43</ref>

As scholar D. Seyfort Ruegg notes,<ref>"Aspects of the Study of the (Earlier) Indian Mahāyāna by D. Seyfort Ruegg. ''Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies'' Volume 27 Number 1, 2004 pgs 52-53</ref>

<blockquote>An idea that has posed a number of thorny questions and conceptual difficulties for Buddhist thought and the history of the Mahāyāna is that often referred to as 'transfer of merit' (''puṇyapariṇāmanā''). The process of ''pariṇāmanā'' (Tib. ''yons su bsno ba'') in fact constitutes a most important feature in Mahāyāna, where it denotes what might perhaps best be termed the dedication of good (''puṇya, śubha, kuśala''; Tib. ''bsod nams, dge ba'') by an exercitant in view of the attainment by another karmically related person (such as a deceased parent or teacher) of a higher end. Yet such dedication appears, ''prima facie'', to run counter to the karmic principle of the fruition or retribution of deeds (''karmavipāka''). Generally accepted in Buddhism, both Mahāyānist and non-Mahāyānist, this principle stipulates that a karmic fruit or result (''karmaphala'') is 'reaped', i.e. experienced, solely by the person - or more precisely by the conscious series (''saṃtāna'') - that has sown the seed of future karmic fruition when deliberately (''cetayitva'') accomplishing an action (''karman'').</blockquote>

<blockquote>The related idea of acquisition/possession (of 'merit', Pali ''patti'', Skt. ''prāpti''), of assenting to and rejoicing in it (''pattānumodanā''), and even of its gift (''pattidāna'') are known to sections of the Theravāda tradition; and this concept - absent in the oldest canonical texts in Pali, but found in later Pali tradition (''Petavatthu, Buddhāpadāna'') - has been explained by some writers as being due to Mahāyānist influence, and by reference to Nalinaksha Dutt's category of 'semi-Mahāyāna.'</blockquote>


=====Nichiren Buddhism=====
Scholar Tommi Lehtonen notes that (fellow scholar) "Wolfgang Schumann says that "the Mahāyāna teaching of the transfer of merit `breaks the strict causality of the Hinayānic law of ''karman'' (P. ''kamma'') according to which everybody wanting better rebirth can reach it solely by his own efforts’ . Yet, Schumann claims that on this point Mahāyāna and Hinayāna differ only in the texts, for the religious practice in South East Asia acknowledges the transference of karmic merit (P. pattidāna) in Theravāda as well."<ref>''Buddhism. An Outline of its Teachings and Schools'' by Schumann, Hans Wolfgang , trans. by Georg Fenerstein, Rider: 1973), p. 92. Cited in "The Notion of Merit in Indian Religions," by Tommi Lehtonen, ''Asian Philosophy'', Vol. 10, No. 3, 2000 pg 193</ref>
Nichiren Buddhism teaches that transformation and change through faith and practice changes adverse karma—negative causes made in the past that result in negative results in the present and future—to positive causes for benefits in the future.{{sfn|Fowler|Fowler|2009|p=78}}


==Modern interpretations and controversies== ==Modern interpretations and controversies==


===Social conditioning===
===Karma theory & social justice===
Buddhist modernists often prefer to equate karma with social conditioning, in contradistinction with, as one scholar puts it, "early texts <nowiki></nowiki> give us little reason to interpret 'conditioning' as the infusion into the psyche of external social norms, or of awakening as simply transcending all psychological conditioning and social roles. Karmic conditioning drifts semantically toward 'cultural conditioning' under the influence of western discourses that elevate the individual over the social, cultural, and institutional. The traditional import of the karmic conditioning process, however, is primarily ethical and soteriological—actions condition circumstances in this and future lives."{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=198}}
Since the exposure of the West to Buddhism, some western commentators and Buddhists have taken exception to aspects of karma theory, and have proposed revisions of various kinds. These proposals fall under the rubric of ].{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=174}} As one scholar writes, "Some modern Buddhist thinkers appear largely to have abandoned traditional views of karma and rebirth in light of the contemporary transformation of the conception of interdependence," preferring instead to align karma purely with contemporary ideas of causality.{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=174}}
One scholar writes, "it is perhaps possible to say that both Buddhism and Buddhist ethics may be better off without the karmic-rebirth factor to deal with."<ref>"A Buddhist Ethic Without Karmic Rebirth?" by Winston L. King ''Journal of Buddhist Ethics'' Volume 1 1994</ref> Often these critical writers have backgrounds in ] and/or ].

The "primary critique" of the Buddhist doctrine of karma is that some feel "karma may be socially and politically disempowering in its cultural effect, that without intending to do this, karma may in fact support social passivity or acquiescence in the face of oppression of various kinds."<ref>Critical Questions Towards a Naturalized Concept of Karma in Buddhism" by Dale S. Wright ''Journal of Buddhist Ethics'' Volume 11, 2004 pg 81<sup></sup></ref> Dale S. Wright, a scholar specializing in Zen Buddhism, has proposed that the doctrine be reformulated for modern people, "separated from elements of supernatural thinking," so that karma is asserted to condition only personal qualities and dispositions rather than rebirth and external occurrences.<ref>Critical Questions Towards a Naturalized Concept of Karma in Buddhism" by Dale S. Wright ''Journal of Buddhist Ethics'' Volume 11, 2004 pgs 89-90<sup></sup></ref>

One scholar and Zen practitioner, ], echoes these remarks. He writes, "what are we going to do about karma? There's no point in pretending that karma hasn't become a problem for contemporary Buddhism. Buddhism can fit quite nicely into modern ways of understanding. But not traditional views of karma."{{sfn|Loy|2008|p=55}} Loy argues that the traditional view of karma is "fundamentalism" which Buddhism must "outgrow."{{sfn|Loy|2008|p=57}}

Loy argues that the idea of accumulating merit too easily becomes "spirtitual materialism," a view echoed by other Buddhist modernists,<ref>Ken Jones,'' The Social Face of Buddhism: An Approach to Political and Social Activism'', Wisdom Publications, 1989, quoted in "A Buddhist Ethic Without Karmic Rebirth?" by Winston L. King ''Journal of Buddhist Ethics'' Volume 1 1994</ref> and further that

<blockquote>Karma has been used to rationalize racism, caste, economic oppression, birth handicaps and everything else. Taken literally, karma justifies the authority of political elites, who therefore must deserve their wealth and power, and the subordination of those who have neither. It provides the perfect theodicy: if there is an infallible cause-and-effect relationship between one's actions and one's fate, there is no need to work toward social justice, because it's already built into the moral fabric of the universe. In fact, if there is no undeserved suffering, there is really no evil that we need to struggle against. It will all balance out in the end.{{sfn|Loy|2008|p=57}}</blockquote>

While some strands of later Buddhist thought did attribute all experience to past karma, the early texts explicitly did not, and in particular state that caste is not determined by karma.{{sfn|Matthews|1986|p=126}}

====Karma and the Holocaust====
Loy goes on to argue that the view that suffering such as that undergone by ] victims could be attributed in part to the karmic ripenings of those victims is "fundamentalism, which blames the victims and rationalizes their horrific fate," and that this is "something no longer to be tolerated quietly. It is time for modern Buddhists and modern Buddhism to outgrow it" by revising or discarding the teachings on karma.{{sfn|Loy|2008|p=55}} Other scholars have argued, however, that the teachings on karma do not encourage judgment and blame, given that the victims were not the same people who committed the acts, but rather were just part of the same ]-continuum with the past actors,<ref>"Karmic Calculations: The Social Implications of Karmic Causality in Tibet
Erin Burke. ''Chrestomathy: Annual Review of Undergraduate Research at the College of Charleston'' Volume 2, 2003 pgs 32-33</ref> and that the teachings on karma instead provide "a thoroughly satisfying explanation for suffering and loss" in which believers take comfort.<ref>"Karmic Calculations: The Social Implications of Karmic Causality in Tibet
Erin Burke. ''Chrestomathy: Annual Review of Undergraduate Research at the College of Charleston'' Volume 2, 2003 pgs 32-33</ref>

The question of the Holocaust also occurs in the ''Jew in the Lotus: A Poet's Re-Discovery of Jewish Identity in Buddhist India'', which describes a group of Jewish religious leaders who meet with the Dalai Lama. They ask one of the Dalai Lama's party, a Buddhist scholar named Geshe Sonam Rinchen, if the Holocaust would be attributed to past karma in the traditional Buddhist view, and he affirms that it would. The author is "shocked and a little outraged," because, like Loy, he felt it "sounded like blaming the victim."{{sfn|Kamenetz|1995|p=122}}

However, within Buddhism there problems about using terms like ''victim blame'' - the notion of blame is not asserted in Buddhism in that, firstly, there has never been any need to develop a ]; and, secondly, the agent of one's actions, the person, is not claimed as being objectively existent. Instead we are, as Dennett (1992) puts it, “centres of narrative gravity.” That is not to say that persons or their actions do not exist, but rather to say that our mode of existence is merely conventional, merely imputed. (For more on this see Garfield 2006 and Newland 2009). If we are to ascribe agency and responsibility (notions that underpin the idea of both 'victim' and 'blame') then we will be ascribing agency and responsibility to the nominal entity of 'person' only. The concepts that underlie Kamenetz's shock and outrage belong to metaphysical assertions which are themselves an anathema to Buddhist thought.{{sfn|Garfield|2013|pp=164-182}}

Garfield also spells out that conflating the notion of Karmic consequence with the notion of justice (reward or punishment) substantially mistakes both the Buddhist account of karma and the structure of Buddhist ethics more generally. This is a consensus among even those who disagree dramatically among themselves about what the structure of Buddhist ethics is (cf. Goodman (2009), Garfield (2013) and Keown (2001). Karmic consequence is not reward or punishment; it is causal consequence. As such, there is no question of justice or injustice, just as there is no question of the justice or injustice of a billiard ball moving in response to being struck by a cue ball.

Moreover, Geshes such as Sonam Rinchen have been at pains to point out that all of us have rich karmic pasts filled with unripened causes that will manifest only when the circumstances that allow them to ripen occur. The fact that the Nazis discriminated against a particular community says nothing about the qualities or karmic heritage of the community. In other words, if we are to talk about 'blame' then it is something that we all should be concerned about.

Many modern Buddhists such as ] prefer to suggest the "dispersion of karmic responsibility into the social system," such that "moral responsibility is decentered from the solitary individual and spread throughout the entire social system," reflecting the ] of ].{{sfn|McMahan|2008|pp=175-176}}

===Is there collective or national karma?===
Other modern Buddhists have sought to formulate theories of group, collective and national karma which are not found in traditional Buddhist thinking. The earliest recorded instance of this occurred in 1925, when a member of the Maha Bodhi named Sheo Narain published an article entitled "Karmic Law" in which he invited Buddhist scholars to explore the question of whether an individual is "responsible not only for his individual actions in his past life but also for past communal deeds."<ref>Sheo Narain, "Karmic Law," The Maha Bodhi, Vol. XXXIII (April, 1925), pp. 197-198, as cited in “Is There Group Karma in Theravāda Buddhism?” by James P. Mc Dermott. Numen, Vol. 23, Fasc. 1 (Apr., 1976), pp. 67</ref></blockquote>

As one scholar writes, "a systematic concept of group karma was in no sense operative in early Theravada" or other schools based on the early sutras. "Instead," he writes, "the repeated emphasis in the canonical discussions of karma is on the individual as heir to his own deeds. It is only in this century, then, that one finds a conscious effort to split with this tradition."

Buddhism does not deny that the actions taken by one generation of the citizens of a given country will have effects on later generations, for example. However, as noted above, all effects of actions are not karmic effects. Karmic effects impinge only on the ]s of those sentient beings who perform the actions. As Nyanatiloka Mahathera writes, individuals

<blockquote>should be responsible for the deeds formerly done by this so-called 'same' people. In reality, however, this present people may not consist at all of the karmic heirs of the same individuals who did these bad deeds. According to Buddhism it is of course quite true that anybody who suffers bodily, suffers for his past or present bad deeds. Thus also each of those individuals born within that suffering nation, must, if actually suffering bodily, have done evil somewhere, here or in one of the innumerable spheres of existence; but he may not have had anything to do with the bad deeds of the so-called nation. We might say that through his evil Karma he was attracted to the miserable condition befitting to him. In short, the term Karma applies, in each instance, only to wholesome and unwholesome volitional activity of the single individual.<ref>Nyanatiloka Mahathera, Karma and Rebirth, The Wheel Publication No. 9 (Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society, 1959), p. 17, as quoted in “Is There Group Karma in Theravāda Buddhism?” by James P. Mc Dermott. Numen, Vol. 23, Fasc. 1 (Apr., 1976), pp. 73</ref></blockquote>

Thus, in the traditional view the effects of the actions of other beings—such as the leader of one's country, or prior generations of its citizens—might well serve as causes of suffering for an individual on one level, but not they would not be the ''karmic'' causes of the suffering of that individual—those causes would function in ''congruence'' with the karmic causes. There is, therefore, no "national karma" in traditional Buddhism.<ref>"New Voices in Engaged Buddhist Studies" by Kenneth Kraft, in ''Engaged Buddhism in the West'' ed. Christopher S. Queen, Wisdom Publications: 2000 ISBN 0-86171-159-9 pgs 499-500</ref> One "scholar of engaged Buddhism" wrote an article asserting that the "collective karma" of the United States deriving from the ] would potentially "play out for generations,"<ref>"Bad Karma: Torturers are planting horrible seeds in their own hearts and minds. Unfortunately, the same is true for nations." by Deborah Caldwell on Beliefnet.com published 5-04, <sup></sup></ref> a view that is not supported by traditional Buddhist views of karma. The effects may well be felt by Americans for generations, but they would not constitute "collective karma."

"Collective karma" could be spoken of only in certain limited senses in the canonical tradition. In Vasubandu's ''Karmasiddhiprakarana'', among other places, it is asserted that a group of individuals who collaborate and share the same intention for a planned action will all incur karmic merit or demerit based on that action, regardless of which individual actually carries out the action. The fruition of their merit or demerit, however, will not necessarily be experienced by each of the individuals together, and/or at the same time. Likewise, "family karma" is possible only when it refers to karmic dispositions which are similar in each individual family member.<ref>“Is There Group Karma in Theravāda Buddhism?” by James P. Mc Dermott. Numen, Vol. 23, Fasc. 1 (Apr., 1976), pp. 68</ref> One scholar points out, "statements concerning group karma . . .are subject to conceptual confusion. It is important to distinguish group karma from what might be termed conjunctive karma, that is, the karmic residues which we experience as a result of the actions of everyone or everything operating casually in the situation, but which are justified by our own accumulated karma. . . the actions of many persons . . .mediate our karma to us. But this is not group karma, for the effect which we experience is justified by our own particular acts or pool of karma, and not by the karmic acts or pool of the group, even though it is mediated by the actions of others."{{sfn|Reichenbach|1990|p=142}}

===Is karma just "social conditioning?"===
Buddhist modernists also often prefer to equate karma with social conditioning, in contradistinction with, as one scholar puts it, "early texts <nowiki></nowiki> give us little reason to interpret 'conditioning' as the infusion into the psyche of external social norms, or of awakening as simply transcending all psychological conditioning and social roles. Karmic conditioning drifts semantically toward 'cultural conditioning' under the influence of western discourses that elevate the individual over the social, cultural, and institutional. The traditional import of the karmic conditioning process, however, is primarily ethical and soteriological—actions condition circumstances in this and future lives."{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=198}}


Essentially, this understanding limits the scope of the traditional understanding of karmic effects so that it encompasses only ''saṃskāra''s—habits, dispositions and tendencies—and not external effects, while at the same time expanding the scope to include social conditioning that does not particularly involve volitional action.{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=198}} Essentially, this understanding limits the scope of the traditional understanding of karmic effects so that it encompasses only ''saṃskāra''s—habits, dispositions and tendencies—and not external effects, while at the same time expanding the scope to include social conditioning that does not particularly involve volitional action.{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=198}}


===Karma theory and social justice===
==Contemporary glosses==
Some western commentators and Buddhists have taken exception to aspects of karma theory, and have proposed revisions of various kinds. These proposals fall under the rubric of ].{{sfn|McMahan|2008|p=174}}
Many contemporary Buddhist teachers have provided brief explanations of karma as a means of introducing this concept to Western students. A sampling of these summaries is included here.


The "primary critique" of the Buddhist doctrine of karma is that some feel "karma may be socially and politically disempowering in its cultural effect, that without intending to do this, karma may in fact support social passivity or acquiescence in the face of oppression of various kinds."{{sfn|Wright|2004|p=81}} Dale S. Wright, a scholar specializing in Zen Buddhism, has proposed that the doctrine be reformulated for modern people, "separated from elements of supernatural thinking," so that karma is asserted to condition only personal qualities and dispositions rather than rebirth and external occurrences.{{sfn|Wright|2004|pp=89-90}}
===Phillip Moffitt (seeds of consequence)===
Phillip Moffitt states:{{sfn|Moffitt|2008|loc=Kindle loc: 2869}}
: the seeds of consequence that will bloom in the future when conditions are suitable.


Loy argues that the idea of accumulating merit too easily becomes "spiritual materialism," a view echoed by other Buddhist modernists,{{refn|group=note|name="Jones"|Ken Jones,'' The Social Face of Buddhism: An Approach to Political and Social Activism'', Wisdom Publications, 1989, quoted in "A Buddhist Ethic Without Karmic Rebirth?" by Winston L. King ''Journal of Buddhist Ethics'' Volume 1 1994}} and further that karma has been used to rationalize racism, caste, economic oppression, birth handicaps and everything else.{{sfn|Loy|2008|p=57}}
===Ken McLeod (each action is a seed)===
Ken McLeod states:<ref group=web name=McLeod>, Ken McLeod</ref>
: Karma, then, describes how our actions evolve into experience, internally and externally. Each action is a seed which grows or evolves into our experience of the world. Every action either starts a new growth process or reinforces an old one as described by the four results. Small wonder that we place so much emphasis on mindfulness and attention. What we do in each moment is very important!


Loy goes on to argue that the view that suffering such as that undergone by ] victims could be attributed in part to the karmic ripenings of those victims is "fundamentalism, which blames the victims and rationalizes their horrific fate," and that this is "something no longer to be tolerated quietly. It is time for modern Buddhists and modern Buddhism to outgrow it" by revising or discarding the teachings on karma.{{sfn|Loy|2008|p=55}}
===Sogyal Rinpoche (each action is pregnant with consequences)===
Sogyal Rinpoche states:{{sfn|Sogyal Rinpoche|2009|pp=96-97}}
:In simple terms, what does karma mean? It means that whatever we do, with our body, speech, or mind, will have a corresponding result. Each action, even the smallest, is pregnant with its consequences. It is said by the masters that even a little poison can cause death and even a tiny seed can become a huge tree. And as Buddha said: “Do not overlook negative actions merely because they are small; however small a spark may be, it can burn down a haystack as big as a mountain.” Similarly he said: “Do not overlook tiny good actions, thinking they are of no benefit; even tiny drops of water in the end will fill a huge vessel.” Karma does not decay like external things, or ever become inoperative. It cannot be destroyed “by time, fire, or water.” Its power will never disappear, until it is ripened. Although the results of our actions may not have matured yet, they will inevitably ripen, given the right conditions.


Other scholars have argued, however, that the teachings on karma do not encourage judgment and blame, given that the victims were not the same people who committed the acts, but rather were just part of the same ]-continuum with the past actors,{{sfn|Burke|2003|pp=32-33}} and that the teachings on karma instead provide "a thoroughly satisfying explanation for suffering and loss" in which believers take comfort.{{sfn|Burke|2003|pp=32-33}}
===Khandro Rinpoche (causes and conditions that create certain circumstances)===
Khandro Rinpoche states:{{sfn|Khandro Rinpoche|2003|p=95}}
:Buddhism is a nontheistic philosophy. We do not believe in a creator but in the causes and conditions that create certain circumstances that then come to fruition. This is called karma. It has nothing to do with judgement; there is no one keeping track of our karma and sending us up above or down below. Karma is simply the ''wholeness'' of a cause, or first action, and its effect, or fruition, which then becomes another cause. In fact, one karmic cause can have many fruitions, all of which can cause thousands more creations. Just as a handful of seed can ripen into a full field of grain, a small amount of karma can generate limitless effects.

===Peter Harvey (a seed that results in certain fruits) ===
Peter Harvey states:{{sfn|Harvey|1990|pp=39-40}}
:Karma is often likened to a seed, and the two words for karmic result, ''vipaka'' and ''phala'', respectively mean 'ripening' and 'fruit'. An action is thus like a seed which will sooner or later, as part of its natural maturation process, result in certain fruits accruing to the doer of the action.

:What determines the nature of the karmic 'seed' is the will or intention behind the act: 'It is will (''cetana''), O monks, that I call karma; having willed, one acts through body, speech, and mind' (A.III.415). It is the psychological impulse behind an action that is 'karma', that which sets going a chain of causes culminating in karmic fruit. Actions, then, must be intentional if they are to generate karmic fruits .

===Geshe Tashi Tsering (cause and effect)===
Geshe Tashi Tsering states:{{sfn|Geshe Tashi Tsering|2005|loc=Kindle loc: 2405-2406}}
: the natural law of cause and effect whereby positive actions produce happiness and negative actions produce suffering.

===Rupert Gethin (mental act or intention)===
Rupert Gethin states:{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=120}}
: At root karma or 'action' is considered a mental act or intention; it is an aspect of our mental life. {{refn|group=note|Additional formatting and text in brackets added for clarity.}}
::'It is "intention" that I call karma; having formed the intention, one performs acts (karma) by body, speech and mind.' {{refn|group=note|Gethin includes the following footnote: Aṅguttara Nikāya iii. 415; cf. Atthasālinī 88–9}}
: Thus acts of body and speech are driven by an underlying intention or will (cetanā) and they are unwholesome or wholesome because they are motivated by unwholesome or wholesome intentions. Acts of body and speech are, then, the end products of particular kinds of mentality. At the same time karma can exist as a simple ‘act of will’, a forceful mental intention or volition that does not lead to an act of body or speech.


==See also== ==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=18em}}
;Buddhism
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] (Dependent Origination) * ] (Dependent Origination)
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
;Indian religions
* ]
* ]
;Other
* ] (Plato)
{{div col end}}


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note|2}} {{reflist|group=note|30em}}

==Quotes==
{{reflist|group=quote|30em}}
''Subnotes''
{{reflist|group=subnote}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} {{Reflist|colwidth=18em}}


==Web references== ==Sources==
{{Reflist|group=web}}


===Printed sources===
==Sources==
{{refbegin}} {{refbegin}}
* {{Citation| last =Ajahn Sucitto | year =2010 | title =Turning the Wheel of Truth: Commentary on the Buddha's First Teaching | publisher =Shambhala }}


====Sutta Pitaka====
* {{Citation | last =Bechert| first=Heinz | year= 1992 |title=Buddha-field and transfer of merit in a Theravāda source|work=Indo-Iranian Journal|issue= Vol. 35, Issues 2-3, July 1992, pp. 95-108}}
* {{Citation | last =Beer| first=Robert | year= 2003 |title=The Handbook of Tibetan Buddhist Symbols| publisher =Shambhala}} * {{Citation| translator1-first= Bhikkhu |translator1-last=Bodhi | year =2000 | title =The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya | publisher =Wisdom Publications | place =Boston | isbn=0-86171-331-1}}
* {{Citation| last = Bhikkhu Bodhi (translator) | year =2000 | title =The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya | publisher =Wisdom Publications | place =Boston | isbn=0-86171-331-1}} * {{Citation| translator1-first= Bhikkhu |translator1-last=Nanamoli | year =1995 | title =The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya | place =Boston | publisher =Wisdom Publications | isbn =0-86171-072-X}}
* {{Citation| last = Bhikkhu Nanamoli (translator) | year =1995 | title =The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya |place =Boston | publisher =Wisdom Publications | isbn =0-86171-072-X}}
* {{Citation|last =Bhikkhu Thanissaro|title=Wings to Awakening: Part I|year=2010|publisher=Metta Forest Monastery, Valley Center, CA|url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/wings.pdf}}
* {{Citation | last =Bronkhorst | first =Johannes | year =1993 | title =The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass Publ.}}
* {{Citation | last =Bronkhorst | first =Johannes | year =1998 | title =Did the Buddha Believe in Karma and Rebirth? | journal =Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 21 (1), 1-20 | url =https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jiabs/article/download/8869/2776}}
* {{Citation| last =Chapple | first=Christopher | year= 1986 |title =Karma and Creativity | publisher =State University of New York Press|isbn=0-88706-250-4 | url=http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=QSrzLfyHvxYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=karman+karma&ots=BBuTLDTa_y&sig=6BMQK2dkTKmC3rIAaZ8HgjnBI3g#v=onepage&q=neuter&f=false}}
* {{Citation| last =Dalai Lama| year =1992| title =The Meaning of Life: Buddhist Perspectives on Cause and Effect|others=Translated and edited by Jeffrey Hopkins| publisher =Wisdom}}
* {{Citation| last =Dalai Lama| year =1998| title =The Four Noble Truths| publisher =Thorsons}}
* {{Citation| last =Dalai Lama| year =2013| title =Kindness, Clarity, and Insight| publisher =Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last =Dargyay | first = Lobsang | chapter =Tsong-Kha-Pa's Concept of Karma | editor-last =Neufeldt| editor-first=Ronald W. | year= 1986 |title =Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments | publisher =State University of New York Press |isbn= 0-87395-990-6 }}
* {{Citation| last =De Silva | first =Padmasiri | year =1998 |title =Environmental Philosophy and Ethics in Buddhism | publisher =Macmillan}}
* {{Citation | last=Dowling|first=Thomas L.|chapter=Karma Doctrine and Sectarian Development| editor-last =Narain| editor-first=A.K. | year= 2006 |title =Studies in Pali and Buddhism: A Memorial Volume in Honour of Bhikku Jagdish Kashyap | publisher =B.R. Publishing Corporation }}
* {{Citation| last =Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse| year =2011| title =What Makes You Not a Buddhist| publisher =Shambhala, Kindle Edition}}


====Buddhist teachers====
* {{Citation| last =Garfield | first = Jay | chapter =Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose: Freedom, Agency and Ethics for Madhyamikas | editor-last1 =Dasti| editor-first1=Matthew R. | editor-last2= Bryant| editor-first2=Edwin F.| year= 2013 |title =Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy | publisher =Oxford University Press }}
* {{Citation| last =Dalai Lama| year =1998| title =The Four Noble Truths| publisher =Thorsons}}
* {{Citation | last =Dōgen | first =Kigen | year =1975 | title =Shobogenzo: The Eye and Treasury of the True Law, Vol. 1 |others=Kosen Nishiyama and John Stevens (translators) | place =Sendai, Japan | publisher =Daihokkaikaku Publishing Co.}}
* {{Citation | last=Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse| year=2012 |title= Not for Happiness, A Guide to the So-Called Preliminary Practices | publisher=Shambala Publications | isbn=978-1-61180-030-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Sjf2Qa-GWlwC}}
* {{Citation| last =Geshe Tashi Tsering | year =2005 | title =The Four Noble Truths: The Foundation of Buddhist Thought, Volume I | publisher =Wisdom, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation| last =Geshe Tashi Tsering | year =2005 | title =The Four Noble Truths: The Foundation of Buddhist Thought, Volume I | publisher =Wisdom, Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last =Gethin | first = Rupert | year =1998 | title =Foundations of Buddhism | publisher =Oxford University Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Goldstein | first = Joseph | year =2011 | title =One Dharma: The Emerging Western Buddhism | publisher =HarperCollins, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation| last =Goldstein | first = Joseph | year =2011 | title =One Dharma: The Emerging Western Buddhism | publisher =HarperCollins, Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last =Goldstein | first = Joseph | year =2013 | title =Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to Awakening | publisher =Sounds True, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation| last =Goldstein | first = Joseph | year =2013 | title =Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to Awakening | publisher =Sounds True, Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last=Kalu Rinpoche | year=1993 |title=Luminous Mind: The Way of the Buddha | publisher=Wisdom |isbn= 0-86171-118-1}}
* {{Citation | last=Goodman|first=Steven D. | chapter =Situational Patterning: Pratītyasamutpāda | editor-last =Tarthang Tulku |title =Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments |year=1992 |title =Crystal Mirror Series I-III | publisher =Dharma Publishing }}
* {{Citation| last =Kamenetz | first =Rodger | year =1995 |title =Jew in the Lotus: A Poet's Re-Discovery of Jewish Identity in Buddhist India | publisher =HarperOne | author-link=Rodger Kamenetz}}
* {{Citation| last =Khandro Rinpoche | year=2003| title= This Precious Life| publisher=Shambhala}}
* {{Citation| last =Khenchen Konchog Gyaltshen | year=2009| title= A Complete Guide to the Buddhist Path | publisher=Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last =Lama Surya Das | year =1997 | title =Awakening the Buddha Within | publisher =Broadway Books, Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last =Leif | first =Judith | year =2009 | title =Introduction to 'The Truth of Suffering and the Path of Liberation' by Chogyam Trungpa (edited by Judy Leif) | publisher =Shambhala }}
* {{Citation| last =Mingyur Rinpoche| year =2007 | title =The Joy of Living: Unlocking the Secret and Science of Happiness| publisher = Harmony Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last =Moffitt | first =Philip| year =2008 | title =Dancing with Life: Buddhist Insights for Finding Meaning and Joy in the Face of Suffering | publisher =Rodale, Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation |author=Padmakara Translation Group |year=1994 |title=The Words of My Perfect teacher |publisher=HarperCollins Publishers India}}
* {{Citation| last=Patrul Rinpoche| year=2011| title=The Words of My Perfect Teacher| publisher=First University Press Edition| isbn=978-0-300-16532-6| url-access=registration| url=https://archive.org/details/kunzanlamaishelu0000orgy}}
* {{Citation|last=P. A. Payutto |chapter=Misunderstandings of The Law of Kamma |year=1993 |title=Good, Evil and Beyond: Kamma in the Buddha's Teaching |chapter-url=http://www.buddhanet.net/cmdsg/kamma6.htm |publisher=www.buddhanet.net |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004214153/http://www.buddhanet.net/cmdsg/kamma6.htm |archive-date=October 4, 2013 }}
* {{Citation| last= Ringu Tulku | year =2005 | title =Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism| publisher = Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last= Ringu Tulku | year =2012 | title =Confusion Arises as Wisdom: Gampopa's Heart Advice on the Path of Mahamudra| publisher = Shambhala, Kindle Edition.}}
* {{Citation| last =Sonam Rinchen| year =2006| title =How Karma Works: The Twelve Links of Dependent Arising| publisher =Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last =Thubten Jinpa| year =2014| title =Mind Training: The Great Collection (Kindle Edition)| publisher =Wisdom}}
* {{Citation| last= Thrangu Rinpoche| year =2001 | title =The Twelve Links of Interdependent Origination | publisher = Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last= Thrangu Rinpoche| year =2012 | title =Pointing Out The Dharmakaya: Teachings On The Ninth Karmapa's Text | publisher = Nama Buddha}}
* {{Citation| last= Traleg Kyabgon| year =2001 | title =The Essence of Buddhism | publisher = Shambhala}}
* {{Citation | last=Tsongkhapa| editor-last =Cutler| editor-first=Joshua W. C. | year=2000 |title =The Great Treatise On The Stages Of The Path To Enlightenment Vol 1 | publisher =Snow Lion }}
* {{Citation| last= Walpola Rahula | year =2007| title =What the Buddha Taught| publisher = Grove Press|edition=Kindle}}
* {{Citation| last= Zopa Rinpoche | first= Lama Thubten | year=2004 | title=Becoming Vajrasattva: the tantric path of purification / Lama Tubten Yeshe |editor=Nicholas Ribush | publisher=Wisdom Publications | isbn = 0-86171-389-3 }}


====Scholarly sources====
* {{Citation | last =Akizuki | first =Ryōmin | year =1990 | title =New Mahāyāna: Buddhism for a Post-modern World | publisher =Jain Publishing Company}}
* {{Citation | last =Bronkhorst | first =Johannes | author-link = Johannes Bronkhorst | year =1993 | title =The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass}}
* {{Citation | last =Bronkhorst | first =Johannes | year =1998 | title =Did the Buddha Believe in Karma and Rebirth? | journal =Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=1–20 | url =http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/jiabs/article/view/8869/2776}}
* {{Citation |last=Bronkhorst |first=Johannes |year=2000 |title=Karma and Teleology: A Problem and its Solutions in Indian Philosophy |work=Studia Philologica |volume=XV |series=Monograph Series |publisher=The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies |place=Tokyo |url=http://my.unil.ch/serval/document/BIB_4DC92BB0676F.pdf |url-status=deviated |archive-date=2019-04-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190407104155/https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4DC92BB0676F.P001/REF}}
* {{Citation | last =Bucknell | first =Rod |date=1984| title =The Buddhist Path to Liberation: An Analysis of the Listing of Stages | journal =The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies |volume=7 |issue=2}}
* {{Citation | last =Burke | first =Erin | year =2003 | chapter =Karmic Calculations: The Social Implications of Karmic Causality in Tibet | title =Chrestomathy: Annual Review of Undergraduate Research at the College of Charleston, Volume 2, 2003}}
* {{Citation | editor-last =Buswell | editor-first =Robert E. | year =2004 | title =Encyclopedia of Buddhism | publisher =Macmillan Reference USA}}
* {{Citation | editor-last1 =Buswell | editor-first1 =Robert E. | editor-last2 =Lopez | editor-first2 =Donald S. Jr. | year =2013 | title =The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism | publisher =Princeton University Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Chapple | first =Christopher | year =1986 | title =Karma and Creativity | publisher =State University of New York Press|isbn=0-88706-250-4}}
* {{Citation | last =Collins | first =Steven | year =1999 | title =Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada Buddhism | publisher =Cambridge University Press}}
* {{Citation | last =Conze | first =Edward | year =1967 | title =Thirty years of Buddhis Studies. Selected essays by Edward Conze | publisher =Bruno Cassirer | url =http://lirs.ru/lib/conze/Thirty_Years_of_Buddhist_studies,Conze,1967,incomplete,300dpi.pdf}}
* {{Citation| last =Dargyay | first =Lobsang | year= 1986 | chapter =Tsong-Kha-Pa's Concept of Karma | editor-last =Neufeldt | title =Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments | publisher =State University of New York Press |isbn= 0-87395-990-6 }}
* {{Citation | last =Dasgupta | first =Surendranath | year =1991 | title =A History of Indian Philosophy, Volume 4 | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass}}
* {{Citation | last =Dowling | first =Thomas L. | year= 2006 | chapter =Karma Doctrine and Sectarian Development | editor-last =Narain | editor-first =A.K. | title =Studies in Pali and Buddhism: A Memorial Volume in Honour of Bhikku Jagdish Kashyap | publisher =B.R. Publishing Corporation }}
* {{cite book |last1=Fowler |first1=Jeaneane |last2=Fowler |first2=Merv |year=2009 |title=Chanting in the Hillsides |publisher=Sussex Academic Press |place=Portland, Oregon}}
* {{Citation | last =Garfield | first =Jay L. | year =1995 | title =The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika | publisher =Oxford University Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Garfield | first = Jay | chapter =Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose: Freedom, Agency and Ethics for Madhyamikas | editor-last1 =Dasti| editor-first1=Matthew R. | editor-last2= Bryant| editor-first2=Edwin F.| year= 2013 |title =Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy | publisher =Oxford University Press }}
* {{Citation| last =Gethin | first = Rupert | year =1998 | title =Foundations of Buddhism | publisher =Oxford University Press}}
* {{Citation | last =Gombrich | first =Richard F. | year =1991 | title =Buddhist Precept and Practice. Traditional Buddhism in the Rural Highlands of Ceylon | publisher =Motilall Banarsidass}}
* {{Citation | last =Gombrich | first =Richard | year =1996 | title= Theravada Buddhism. A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo | publisher =Routledge}}
* {{Citation | last =Gombrich | first =Richard F. | year =1997 | title =How Buddhism Began. The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings | place =New Delhi | publisher =Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.}}
* {{Citation | last =Gombrich | first =Richard | year =2009 | title =What the Buddha Thought | publisher =Equinox}}
* {{Citation | last=Goodman |first=Steven D. | chapter =Situational Patterning: Pratītyasamutpāda | editor-last =Tarthang Tulku |title =Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments |year=1992 |series =Crystal Mirror Series I-III | publisher =Dharma Publishing }}
* {{Citation| last =Harvey | first =Peter | year =1990 |title =Introduction to Buddhism | publisher =Cambridge University Press}} * {{Citation| last =Harvey | first =Peter | year =1990 |title =Introduction to Buddhism | publisher =Cambridge University Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Harvey | first = Brian Peter | year =1995 |title =The Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvāṇa in Early Buddhism | publisher =Routledge|isbn= 0-7007-0338-1}} * {{Citation| last =Harvey | first = Brian Peter | year =1995 |title =The Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvāṇa in Early Buddhism | publisher =Routledge|isbn= 0-7007-0338-1}}
* {{Citation| last =Harvey | first = Brian Peter | year =2000 |title =An Introduction to Buddhist ethics: Foundations, Values, and Issues | publisher =Routledge|isbn= 0-521-55640-6}} * {{Citation| last =Harvey | first = Brian Peter | year =2000 |title =An Introduction to Buddhist ethics: Foundations, Values, and Issues | publisher =Routledge|isbn= 0-521-55640-6}}
* {{Citation | last =Hirota | first =Dennis | year =2004 | chapter =Karman: Buddhist concepts | editor-last =Jones | editor-first =Lindsay | title = Encyclopedia of Religion|edition = 2nd | publisher =Macmillan Reference USA}}
* {{Citation | last =Huntington | first =Clair W. Jr. | year =1986 | title =The "Akutobhaya" and early Indian Madhyamika (Volumes I and II) (Buddhism, India, China, Tibet). Ph.D. thesis | publisher =University of Michigan}}
* {{Citation| last1 =Huntington | first1 = John C. | last2=Bangdel | first2 = Dina | year =2003 |title =The Circle of Bliss: Buddhist Meditational Art | publisher =Serindia}} * {{Citation| last1 =Huntington | first1 = John C. | last2=Bangdel | first2 = Dina | year =2003 |title =The Circle of Bliss: Buddhist Meditational Art | publisher =Serindia}}

* {{Citation| last =Kalu Rinpoche | year =1993 |title =Luminous Mind: The Way of the Buddha | publisher =Wisdom|isbn= 0-86171-118-1}}
* {{Citation| last =Kalupahana | first =David | year =1975 |title =Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism | publisher =University of Hawaii Press | author-link=David Kalupahana}} * {{Citation| last =Kalupahana | first =David | year =1975 |title =Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism | publisher =University of Hawaii Press | author-link=David Kalupahana}}
* {{Citation | last =Kalupahana | first =David J. | year =1992 | title =The Principles of Buddhist Psychology | place =Delhi | publisher =Sri Satguru Publications }}
* {{Citation| last =Kalupahana | first =David | year =1995 |title =Ethics in Early Buddhism | publisher =University of Hawaii Press | author-link=David Kalupahana}} * {{Citation| last =Kalupahana | first =David | year =1995 |title =Ethics in Early Buddhism | publisher =University of Hawaii Press | author-link=David Kalupahana}}
* {{Citation| last =Kamenetz | first =Rodger | year =1995 |title =Jew in the Lotus: A Poet's Re-Discovery of Jewish Identity in Buddhist India | publisher =HarperOne | author-link=Rodger Kamenetz}}
* {{Citation| last =Keown | first =Damien | year =2000| title =Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction | publisher =Oxford University Press, Kindle Edition | url =http://m.friendfeed-media.com/6a7b5f4d7c23daf707742ddd592ccef00c988a8e}} * {{Citation| last =Keown | first =Damien | year =2000| title =Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction | publisher =Oxford University Press, Kindle Edition | url =http://m.friendfeed-media.com/6a7b5f4d7c23daf707742ddd592ccef00c988a8e}}
* {{Citation | last =Klostermaier | first =Klaus K. | year =1986 | chapter =Contemporary Conceptions of Karma and Rebirth Among North Indian Vaisnavas | editor-last =Neufeldt | editor-first =Ronald W. | title =Karma and Rebirth: Post-classical Developments | publisher =Sri Satguru Publications}}
* {{Citation| last =Khandro Rinpoche | year=2003| title= This Precious Life| publisher=Shambhala}}
* {{Citation| last =Khenchen Konchog Gyaltshen | year=2009| title= A Complete Guide to the Buddhist Path | publisher=Snow Lion}} * {{Citation | last =Kopf | first =Gereon | year =2001 | title =Beyond Personal Identity: Dōgen, Nishida, and a Phenomenology of No-self | publisher =Psychology Press}}
* {{Citation | last= Kragh| first=Ulrich Timme | year= 2006 |title =Early Buddhist Theories of Action and Result: A Study of Karmaphalasambandha, Candrakirti's Prasannapada, verses 17.1-20 | publisher =Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien|isbn=3-902501-03-0}} * {{Citation | last= Kragh| first=Ulrich Timme | year= 2006 |title =Early Buddhist Theories of Action and Result: A Study of Karmaphalasambandha, Candrakirti's Prasannapada, verses 17.1-20 | publisher =Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien|isbn=3-902501-03-0}}

* {{Citation| last =Lama Surya Das | year =1997 | title =Awakening the Buddha Within | publisher =Broadway Books, Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last =Lamotte | first =Etienne | year =1987 | title =Karmasiddhi Prakarana: The Treatise on Action by Vasubandhu | publisher =Asian Humanities Press }} * {{Citation| last =Lamotte | first =Etienne | year =1987 | title =Karmasiddhi Prakarana: The Treatise on Action by Vasubandhu | publisher =Asian Humanities Press }}
* {{Citation| last =Lamotte | first =Etienne | year =1988 | title = History of Indian Buddhism | publisher =Publications de l'Institut Orientaliste de Louvain }} * {{Citation| last =Lamotte | first =Etienne | year =1988 | title = History of Indian Buddhism | publisher =Publications de l'Institut Orientaliste de Louvain }}
* {{Citation| last =Lamotte | first =Etienne | others=English translation by Leo M. Pruden| year =2001 | title =Karmasiddhi Prakarana: The Treatise on Action by Vasubandhu | publisher =Asian Humanities Press }} * {{Citation| last =Lamotte | first =Etienne | others=English translation by Leo M. Pruden| year =2001 | title =Karmasiddhi Prakarana: The Treatise on Action by Vasubandhu | publisher =Asian Humanities Press }}
* {{Citation| last =Leif | first =Judith | year =2009 | title =Introduction to 'The Truth of Suffering and the Path of Liberation' by Chogyam Trungpa (edited by Judy Leif) | publisher =Shambhala }} * {{Citation | last =Langer | first =Rita | year =2007 | title =Buddhist Rituals of Death and Rebirth: Contemporary Sri Lankan Practice and Its Origins | publisher =Routledge}}
* {{Citation | last1 =Lichter | first1 =David | last2 =Epstein | first2 =Lawrence | year =1983 | chapter =Irony in Tibetan Notions of the Good Life | editor-last1 =Keyes | editor-first1 =Charles F. | editor-last2 =Daniel | editor-first2 =E. Valentien | title =Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry | publisher =University of California Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Lopez | first =Donald S.|authorlink=Donald S. Lopez, Jr.| year =2001 | title =The Story of Buddhism | publisher =HarperCollins }}
* {{Citation| last= Loy |first=David R. | year =2008 | title =Money, Sex, War, Karma: Notes for a Buddhist Revolution| publisher = Wisdom| isbn= 0861715586}} * {{Citation | last =Lindtner | first =Christian | year =1997 | title =The Problem of Precanonical Buddhism | journal =Buddhist Studies Review |volume=14 | issue =2 |page=2 | doi =10.1558/bsrv.v14i2.14851 | doi-access =free | s2cid =247883744 | url =https://archive.org/details/BackCopiesOfBuddhistStudiesReview}}
* {{Citation| last =Lusthaus | first =Dan | year =2002 | title =Buddhist Phenomenology: A philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Ch'eng Wei-shih lun | publisher =RoutledgeCurzon |isbn=0-415-40610-2}} * {{Citation | last =Lindtner | first =Christian | year =1999 | title =From Brahmanism to Buddhism | journal =Asian Philosophy |volume=9 |issue=1| pages =5–37 | doi =10.1080/09552369908575487 }}
* {{Citation| last =Lopez | first =Donald S.|author-link=Donald S. Lopez, Jr.| year =2001 | title =The Story of Buddhism | publisher =HarperCollins }}

* {{Citation | last= Loy | first= David R. | year= 2008 | title= Money, Sex, War, Karma: Notes for a Buddhist Revolution | publisher= Wisdom | isbn= 978-0861715589 | url-access= registration | url= https://archive.org/details/moneysexwarkarma00loyd }}
* {{Citation| last =Lusthaus | first =Dan | year =2002 | title =Buddhist Phenomenology: A philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Ch'eng Wei-shih lun | publisher =RoutledgeCurzon |isbn=0-415-40610-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IeiwsT-XqwQC}}
* {{Citation| last =Macy | first=Joanna | year =1991 | title =Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory: The Dharma of Natural Systems | publisher =SUNY }} * {{Citation| last =Macy | first=Joanna | year =1991 | title =Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory: The Dharma of Natural Systems | publisher =SUNY }}
* {{Citation | last=Matthews|first=Bruce|chapter=Chapter Seven: Post-Classical Developments in the Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada Buddhism| editor-last =Neufeldt| editor-first=Ronald W. | year= 1986 |title =Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments | publisher =State University of New York Press |isbn= 0-87395-990-6 }} * {{Citation | last=Matthews|first=Bruce|chapter=Chapter Seven: Post-Classical Developments in the Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada Buddhism| editor-last =Neufeldt| editor-first=Ronald W. | year= 1986 |title =Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments | publisher =State University of New York Press |isbn= 0-87395-990-6 }}
* {{Citation | last =McDermott| first=James Paul | year= 1975 |title=The Kathāvatthu Kamma Debates|work=Journal of the American Oriental Society|issue= Vol. 95, No. 3, Jul. - Sep., 1975}} * {{Citation | last =McDermott| first=James Paul | year= 1975 |title=The Kathāvatthu Kamma Debates|work=Journal of the American Oriental Society|volume= 95|issue= 3, Jul. Sep., 1975}}
* {{Citation | last =McDermott| first=James Paul | year= 1977 |title=Kamma in the Milindapañha|work=Journal of the American Oriental Society|issue= Vol. 97, No. 4, Oct. - Dec., 1977}} * {{Citation | last =McDermott| first=James Paul | year= 1977 |title=Kamma in the Milindapañha|work=Journal of the American Oriental Society|volume= 97|issue= 4, Oct. Dec., 1977}}
* {{Citation | last=McDermott|first=James P.|chapter=Karma and Rebirth in Early Buddhism| editor-last =O'Flaherty| editor-first=Wendy Doniger | year= 1980 |title =Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions | publisher =University of California Press |isbn= 0-520-03923-8 }} * {{Citation | last=McDermott|first=James P.|chapter=Karma and Rebirth in Early Buddhism| editor-last =O'Flaherty| editor-first=Wendy Doniger | year= 1980 |title =Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions | publisher =University of California Press |isbn= 0-520-03923-8 }}
* {{Citation | last =McDermott| first=James Paul | year= 1984 |title =Development in the Early Buddhist Concept of Kamma/Karma | publisher =Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers|isbn= 81-215-0208-X}} * {{Citation | last =McDermott| first=James Paul | year= 1984 |title =Development in the Early Buddhist Concept of Kamma/Karma | publisher =Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers|isbn= 81-215-0208-X}}
* {{Citation | last =McMahan| first=David L. | year= 2008 |title =The Making of Buddhist Modernism | publisher =Oxford University Press|isbn= 978-0-19-518327-6}} * {{Citation | last =McMahan| first=David L. | year= 2008 |title =The Making of Buddhist Modernism | publisher =Oxford University Press|isbn= 978-0-19-518327-6}}
* {{Citation| last =Monier-Williams | orig-year =1899 | year=1964 | title =A Sanskrit-English Dictionary | place =London | publisher =Oxford University Press | url =http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/MWScan/MWScanpdf/mw0483-dut.pdf | access-date =27 December 2008}}
* {{Citation| last =Mingyur Rinpoche| year =2007 | title =The Joy of Living: Unlocking the Secret and Science of Happiness| publisher = Harmony Kindle Edition}}
* {{Citation| last =Moffitt | first =Philip| year =2008 | title =Dancing with Life: Buddhist Insights for Finding Meaning and Joy in the Face of Suffering | publisher =Rodale, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation| last= Norgay | first =Khenpo Tenzin |year=2014 |title=Dusting Off Your Buddha Nature: The Purpose of the Dzogchen Preliminaries |isbn=978-1505587319 |publisher=CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform}}
* {{Citation| last =Monier-Williams | year =1899, 1964 | title =A Sanskrit-English Dictionary | place =London | publisher =Oxford University Press | url =http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/MWScan/MWScanpdf/mw0483-dut.pdf | accessdate =27 December 2008}}

* {{Citation| editor-last=Padma| editor-first=Sree| editor-last2=Barber|editor-first2=A.W. | year= 2009 |title =Buddhism in the Krishna River Valley of Andhra | publisher =State University of New York Press }} * {{Citation| editor-last=Padma| editor-first=Sree| editor-last2=Barber|editor-first2=A.W. | year= 2009 |title =Buddhism in the Krishna River Valley of Andhra | publisher =State University of New York Press }}
* {{Citation| last=Park | first=Changhwan | year= 2007 |title =The Sautrantika Theory of Seeds (''bija'') Revisited | type= PhD thesis| publisher =University of California, Berkeley}} * {{Citation| last=Park | first=Changhwan | year= 2007 |title =The Sautrantika Theory of Seeds (''bija'') Revisited | type= PhD thesis| publisher =University of California, Berkeley}}
* {{Citation | last=P. A. Payutto|chapter=Misunderstandings of The Law of Kamma | year= 1993 |title =Good, Evil and Beyond: Kamma in the Buddha's Teaching | url =http://web.archive.org/web/20131004214153/http://www.buddhanet.net/cmdsg/kamma6.htm | publisher =www.buddhanet.net }} * {{Citation | last =Ray | first =Reginald | year =1999 | title =Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations | publisher =Oxford University Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Patrul Rinpoche | year=1998| title= The Words of My Perfect Teacher | publisher=Altamira}} * {{Citation | last =Reat | first =N. Ross | year =1998 | title =The Salistamba Sutra | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass}}
* {{Citation | last =Reichenbach| first=Bruce | year= 1988 |title=The Law of Karma and the Principle of Causation|journal=Philosophy East and West|issue=4|doi=10.2307/1399118 | volume=38 | pages=399–410 | jstor=1399118 }}

* {{Citation | last =Reichenbach| first=Bruce | year= 1988 |title=The Law of Karma and the Principle of Causation|work=Philosophy East and West|issue=Vol. 38, No. 4, Oct 1988}}
* {{Citation | last =Reichenbach| first=Bruce | year= 1990 |title=The Law of Karma: A Philosophical Study |publisher=University of Hawaii Press| isbn= 0-8248-1352-9}} * {{Citation | last =Reichenbach| first=Bruce | year= 1990 |title=The Law of Karma: A Philosophical Study |publisher=University of Hawaii Press| isbn= 0-8248-1352-9}}
* {{Citation| last= Ringu Tulku | year =2005 | title =Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism| publisher = Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last= Ringu Tulku | year =2012 | title =Confusion Arises as Wisdom: Gampopa's Heart Advice on the Path of Mahamudra| publisher = Shambhala, Kindle Edition.}}
* {{Citation| last= Ronkin |first=Noa | year =2005 | title =Early Buddhist Metaphysics: the Making of a Philosophical Tradition| publisher = Routledge| isbn= 0-203-53706-8}} * {{Citation| last= Ronkin |first=Noa | year =2005 | title =Early Buddhist Metaphysics: the Making of a Philosophical Tradition| publisher = Routledge| isbn= 0-203-53706-8}}
* {{Citation | last =Ryose | first =Wataru | year =1987 |title =A Study of the Abhidharmahrdaya: The Historical Development of the Concept of Karma In The Sarvastivada Thought | type =PhD thesis | publisher =University of Wisconsin-Madison | url =https://web.archive.org/web/20141116150853/http://www.surajamrita.com/yoga/hidden/box3/ABHIDHARMAHRDAYA.pdf}} * {{Citation|last=Ryose |first=Wataru |year=1987 |title=A Study of the Abhidharmahrdaya: The Historical Development of the Concept of Karma In The Sarvastivada Thought |type=PhD thesis |publisher=University of Wisconsin-Madison |url=http://www.surajamrita.com/yoga/hidden/box3/ABHIDHARMAHRDAYA.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141116150853/http://www.surajamrita.com/yoga/hidden/box3/ABHIDHARMAHRDAYA.pdf |archive-date=November 16, 2014 }}
* {{Citation| last =Rhys Davids | first =Caroline Augusta | year =2007 |title =Buddhism | publisher =Davids Press}} * {{Citation| last =Rhys Davids | first =Caroline Augusta | year =2007 |title =Buddhism | publisher =Davids Press}}
* {{Citation | last =Samuel | first =Geoffrey | year =2010 | title =The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century | publisher =Cambridge University Press}}

* {{Citation | last =Schmithausen | first =Lambert | year =1986 | title =Critical Response. In: Ronald W. Neufeldt (ed.), "Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments" | publisher =SUNY}} * {{Citation | last =Schumann | first =Hans Wolfgang | year =1997 | title =Boeddhisme. Stichter, scholen en systemen | publisher =Asoka}}
* {{cite book |last1=Schmithausen |first1=Lambert |last2=Wezler |first2=Albrecht |last3=Bruhn |first3=Klaus |last4=Alsdorf |first4=Ludwig |year=1981 |chapter=On some aspects of descriptions or theories of 'liberating insight' and 'enlightenment' in early Buddhism |title=Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus |series=Alt- und neu-indische Studien |volume=23 |place=Wiesbaden |publisher=Franz Steiner |isbn=9783515028745 |oclc=1086295202}}<!--best guess-->
* {{Citation | last =Simmer-Brown| first=Judith | year= 1987 |title=Seeing the Dependent Origination of Suffering as the Key to Liberation|work= Journal of Contemplative Psychotherapy, |issue= VOLUME IV|publisher=The Naropa Institute}}
* {{Citation| last1 =Smith| first1=Huston|last2=Novak|first2=Philip| year=2009| title= Buddhism: A Concise Introduction | publisher=HarperOne, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation | last =Schmithausen | first =Lambert | year =1986 | chapter =Critical Response |editor =Ronald W. Neufeldt |title =Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments | publisher =SUNY}}
* {{Citation| last =Sonam Rinchen| year =2006| title =How Karma Works: The Twelve Links of Dependent Arising| publisher =Snow Lion}} * {{Citation | last =Simmer-Brown| first=Judith | year= 1987 |title=Seeing the Dependent Origination of Suffering as the Key to Liberation|work= Journal of Contemplative Psychotherapy |issue= 4|publisher=The Naropa Institute}}
* {{Citation| last =Sogyal Rinpoche| year =2009| title =The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying| publisher =Harper Collins, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation| last1 =Smith| first1 =Huston| last2 =Novak| first2 =Philip| year =2009| title= Buddhism: A Concise Introduction| publisher =HarperOne| edition=Kindle}}
* {{Citation | last =Vetter | first =Tillman | year =1987 | chapter =Some remarks on older parts of the Suttanipiita | editor-last1=Seyfort Ruegg | editor-first1 =Seyfort | editor-last2 =Schmithausen | editor-first2=Lambert | title =Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka | publisher =BRILL}}

* {{Citation| last =Thubten Jinpa| year =2014| title =Mind Training: The Great Collection (Kindle Edition)| publisher =Wisdom}}
* {{Citation| last= Thrangu Rinpoche| year =2001 | title =The Twelve Links of Interdependent Origination | publisher = Snow Lion}}
* {{Citation| last= Thrangu Rinpoche| year =2012 | title =Pointing Out The Dharmakaya: Teachings On The Ninth Karmapa's Text | publisher = Nama Buddha}}
* {{Citation| last= Traleg Kyabgon| year =2001 | title =The Essence of Buddhism | publisher = Shambhala}}
* {{Citation | last=Tsongkhapa| editor-last =Cutler| editor-first=Joshua W. C. | year=2000 |title =The Great Treatise On The Stages Of The Path To Enlightenment Vol 1 | publisher =Snow Lion }}

* {{Citation | last =Vetter | first =Tilmann | year =1988 | title =The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism | publisher =BRILL}} * {{Citation | last =Vetter | first =Tilmann | year =1988 | title =The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism | publisher =BRILL}}

* {{Citation| last= Waldron |first=William S. | year =2003 | title =The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought | publisher = Routledge}} * {{Citation| last= Waldron |first=William S. | year =2003 | title =The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought | publisher = Routledge}}
* {{Citation| last= Walpola Rahula | year =2007| title =What the Buddha Taught| publisher = Grove Press|edition=Kindle}}
* {{Citation| last =Walser | first =Joseph | year =2005 |title =Nāgārjuna in Context: Mahāyāna Buddhism and Early Indian Culture | publisher =Columbia University Press}} * {{Citation| last =Walser | first =Joseph | year =2005 |title =Nāgārjuna in Context: Mahāyāna Buddhism and Early Indian Culture | publisher =Columbia University Press}}
* {{Citation| last =Wardner | first =A.K. | year =1970 | title =Indian Buddhism | place =Delhi}} * {{Citation| last =Wardner | first =A.K. | year =1970 | title =Indian Buddhism}}
* {{Citation| last =Watson | first= Burton | year =1993 | title =The Lotus Sutra | publisher =Columbia University Press}} * {{Citation| last =Watson | first= Burton | year =1993 | title =The Lotus Sutra | publisher =Columbia University Press}}
* {{Citation| last= Williams |first=Paul | year =2002 | title =Buddhist Thought | publisher = Taylor & Francis, Kindle Edition}} * {{Citation| last= Williams |first=Paul | year =2002 | title =Buddhist Thought | publisher =Taylor & Francis |edition=Kindle}}
* {{Citation| editor-last= Williams |editor-first=Paul | year =2005 | title =Buddhism—Critical Concepts in Religious Studies II | publisher = Shi Huifeng}} * {{Citation| editor-last= Williams |editor-first=Paul | year =2005 | title =Buddhism—Critical Concepts in Religious Studies II | publisher = Shi Huifeng}}
* {{Citation | last =Wright | first =Dale S. | title =Critical Questions Towards a Naturalized Concept of Karma in Buddhism | journal =Journal of Buddhist Ethics |volume=11 |year=2004 | url =http://www.buddhistethics.org/11/wright04.html}}
{{refend}} {{refend}}

===Web-sources===
{{Reflist|group=web}}


==Further reading== ==Further reading==
;Scholarly sources

* {{Citation | editor-last =Neufeldt | editor-first =Ronald W. | year =1986 | title =Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments | publisher =SUNY}}
===Books===
* {{Cite book|title=Imagining karma: ethical transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek rebirth|author=Gananath Obeyesekere|publisher=University of California Press|year=2002|isbn=978-0-520-23243-3}}
*] (1992). ''The Meaning of Life'', translated and edited by Jeffrey Hopkins. Wisdom.
* ] (1998). ''Foundations of Buddhism''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-289223-1}}.
*] (2006). ''How Karma Works: The Twelve Links of Dependent Arising''. Snow Lion
;Journal
*] (1998). ''Foundations of Buddhism''. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-289223-1.
* Jonathan S. Walters, Numen, Vol. 37, No. 1 (June 1990), pp.&nbsp;70–95
*] (2003). ''This Precious Life''. Shambala
;Primary sources
* ] (1992). ''The Meaning of Life'', translated and edited by Jeffrey Hopkins. Wisdom.
* ] (2006). ''How Karma Works: The Twelve Links of Dependent Arising''. Snow Lion
* ] (2003). ''This Precious Life''. Shambala
* Ringu Tulku (2005). ''Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism''. Snow Lion. * Ringu Tulku (2005). ''Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism''. Snow Lion.
* {{Cite book|title=Imagining karma: ethical transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek rebirth|author=Gananath Obeyesekere|publisher=University of California Press|year=2002|isbn=978-0-520-23243-3}}


===Journal=== ==External links==
{{Wikiquote|Karma}}
* Jonathan S. Walters, Numen, Vol. 37, No. 1 (June 1990), pp.&nbsp;70–95
{{Wikiquote|Karma in Buddhism}}


;General
==External links==
* , Surendranath Dasgupta, 1940
* , by Ken McLeod
*, by Jeffrey Kotyk * , by Ken McLeod
* , by Jeffrey Kotyk
* , by Alexander Berzin
* , by ]

;Sarvastivada
*

;Theravada
* by ] * by ]
* , by Alexander Berzin
* , by Reginald Ray
* by ] * by ]
* Story about the Buddha and Suppabuddha, father of the Buddha's former wife ] * Story about the Buddha and Suppabuddha, father of the Buddha's former wife ]

;Yogacara
* , Asian Philosophy, Vol. 8 No. 1 Mar.1998.

;Nyingma
* , Chapter IV of The Great Chariot


{{Buddhism topics}} {{Buddhism topics}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Karma In Buddhism}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Karma In Buddhism}}
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:45, 19 November 2024

Action driven by intention which leads to future consequences For the use of this term in other Indian religions, see Karma.
Translations of
karma
Englishkarma
Sanskritकर्मन्
(IAST: karman)
Pali𑀓𑀫𑁆𑀫​
(kamma)
Bengaliকর্ম
(kôrmô)
Burmeseကံ
(MLCTS: kàɰ̃)
Chinese業 or 业
(Pinyin: )
Japanese業 or ごう
(Rōmaji: gou)
Khmerកម្ម
(UNGEGN: kâmm; ALA-LC: kamm; IPA: [kam])
Korean업 or 業
(RR: uhb)
Sinhalaකර්ම
(karma)
Tibetanལས།
(Wylie: las;
THL: lé;
)
Tagalogkalma
Thaiกรรม
(RTGS: gam)
VietnameseNghiệp
Glossary of Buddhism
Part of a series on
Buddhism
History
Buddhist texts
Practices
Nirvāṇa
Traditions
Buddhism by country

Karma (Sanskrit: कर्म, Pāli: kamma) is a Sanskrit term that literally means "action" or "doing". In the Buddhist tradition, karma refers to action driven by intention (cetanā) which leads to future consequences. Those intentions are considered to be the determining factor in the kind of rebirth in samsara, the cycle of rebirth.

Etymology

Karma (Sanskrit, also karman, Pāli: kamma, Tib. las) is a Sanskrit term that literally means "action" or "doing". The word karma derives from the verbal root kṛ, which means "do, make, perform, accomplish."

Karmaphala (Tib. rgyu 'bras) is the "fruit", "effect" or "result" of karma. A similar term is karmavipaka, the "maturation" or "cooking" of karma:

The remote effects of karmic choices are referred to as the 'maturation' (vipāka) or 'fruit' (phala) of the karmic act."

The metaphor is derived from agriculture:

One sows a seed, there is a time lag during which some mysterious invisible process takes place, and then the plant pops up and can be harvested.

Buddhist understanding of karma

Tibetan Bhavacakra or "Wheel of Life" in Sera, Lhasa.

Karma and karmaphala are fundamental concepts in Buddhism. The concepts of karma and karmaphala explain how intentional actions keep one tied to rebirth in samsara, whereas the Buddhist path, as exemplified in the Noble Eightfold Path, shows us the way out of samsara.

Rebirth

Rebirth,, is a common belief in all Buddhist traditions. It says that birth and death in the six realms occur in successive cycles driven by ignorance (avidyā), desire (trsnā), and hatred (dvesa). The cycle of rebirth is called samsāra. It is a beginningless and ever-ongoing process. Liberation from samsāra can be attained by following the Buddhist Path. This path leads to vidyā (knowledge), and the stilling of trsnā and dvesa. Hereby the ongoing process of rebirth is stopped.

Karma

The cycle of rebirth is determined by karma, literally "action". In the Buddhist tradition, karma refers to actions driven by intention (cetanā), a deed done deliberately through body, speech or mind, which leads to future consequences. The Nibbedhika Sutta, Anguttara Nikaya 6.63:

Intention (cetana) I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.

According to Peter Harvey,

It is the psychological impulse behind an action that is 'karma', that which sets going a chain of causes culminating in karmic fruit. Actions, then, must be intentional if they are to generate karmic fruits.

And according to Gombrich,

The Buddha defined karma as intention; whether the intention manifested itself in physical, vocal or mental form, it was the intention alone which had a moral character: good, bad or neutral The focus of interest shifted from physical action, involving people and objects in the real world, to psychological process.

According to Gombrich, this was a great innovation, which overturns brahmanical, caste-bound ethics. It is a rejection of caste-bound differences, giving the same possibility to reach liberation to all people, not just Brahmanins:

Not by birth is one a brahmin or an outcaste, but by deeds (kamma).

How this emphasis on intention was to be interpreted became a matter of debate in and between the various Buddhist schools.

Karmaphala

Karma leads to future consequences, karma-phala, "fruit of action". Any given action may cause all sorts of results, but the karmic results are only those results which are a consequence of both the moral quality of the action, and of the intention behind the action. According to Reichenbach,

he consequences envisioned by the law of karma encompass more (as well as less) than the observed natural or physical results which follow upon the performance of an action.

The "law of karma" applies

...specifically to the moral sphere not concerned with the general relation between actions and their consequences, but rather with the moral quality of actions and their consequences, such as the pain and pleasure and good or bad experiences for the doer of the act.

Good moral actions lead to wholesome rebirths, and bad moral actions lead to unwholesome rebirths. The main factor is how they contribute to the well-being of others in a positive or negative sense. Especially dāna, giving to the Buddhist order, became an increasingly important source of positive karma.

How these intentional actions lead to rebirth, and how the idea of rebirth is to be reconciled with the doctrines of impermanence and no-self, is a matter of philosophical inquiry in the Buddhist traditions, for which several solutions have been proposed. In early Buddhism no explicit theory of rebirth and karma is worked out, and "the karma doctrine may have been incidental to early Buddhist soteriology." In early Buddhism, rebirth is ascribed to craving or ignorance.

In later Buddhism, the basic idea is that intentional actions, driven by kleshas ("disturbing emotions"), cetanā ("volition"), or taṇhā ("thirst", "craving") create impressions, tendencies or "seeds" in the mind. These impressions, or "seeds", will ripen into a future result or fruition. If we can overcome our kleshas, then we break the chain of causal effects that leads to rebirth in the six realms. The twelve links of dependent origination provides a theoretical framework, explaining how the disturbing emotions lead to rebirth in samsara.

Complex process

The Buddha's teaching of karma is not strictly deterministic, but incorporated circumstantial factors, unlike that of the Jains. It is not a rigid and mechanical process, but a flexible, fluid and dynamic process, and not all present conditions can be ascribed to karma. There is no set linear relationship between a particular action and its results. The karmic effect of a deed is not determined solely by the deed itself, but also by the nature of the person who commits the deed, and by the circumstances in which it is committed.

Karma is also not the same as "fate" or "predestination". Karmic results are not a "judgement" imposed by a God or other all-powerful being, but rather the results of a natural process. Certain experiences in life are the results of previous actions, but our responses to those experiences are not predetermined, although they bear their own fruit in the future. Unjust behaviour may lead to unfavorable circumstances which make it easier to commit more unjust behavior, but nevertheless the freedom not to commit unjust behavior remains.

Liberation from samsāra

See also: Right view and Parable of the Poisoned Arrow

The real importance of the doctrine of karma and its fruits lies in the recognition of the urgency to put a stop to the whole process. The Acintita Sutta warns that "the results of kamma" is one of the four incomprehensible subjects, subjects that are beyond all conceptualization and cannot be understood with logical thought or reason.

According to Gombrich, this sutra may have been a warning against the tendency, "probably from the Buddha's day until now", to understand the doctrine of karma "backwards", to explain unfavorable conditions in this life when no other explanations are available. Gaining a better rebirth may have been, and still is, the central goal for many people. The adoption, by laity, of Buddhist beliefs and practices is seen as a good thing, which brings merit and good rebirth, but does not result in Nirvana, and liberation from samsāra, the ultimate goal of the Buddha.

Within the Pali suttas

See also: Anatta and moral responsibility

According to the Buddhist tradition, the lord Buddha gained full and complete insight into the workings of karma at the time of his enlightenment. According to Bronkhorst, these knowledges are later additions to the story, just like the notion of "liberating insight" itself.

In AN 5.292, the lord Buddha asserted that it is not possible to avoid experiencing the result of a karmic deed once it has been committed.

In the Anguttara Nikaya, it is stated that karmic results are experienced either in this life (P. diṭṭadhammika) or in future lives (P. samparāyika). The former may involve a readily observable connection between action and karmic consequence, such as when a thief is captured and tortured by the authorities, but the connection need not necessarily be that obvious and in fact usually is not observable.

The Samyutta Nikaya makes a basic distinction between past karma (P. purānakamma) which has already been incurred, and karma being created in the present (P. navakamma). Therefore, in the present one both creates new karma (P. navakamma) and encounters the result of past karma (P. kammavipāka). Karma in the early canon is also threefold: Mental action (S. manaḥkarman), bodily action (S. kāyakarman) and vocal action (S. vākkarman).

Within Buddhist traditions

See also: Development of Karma in Buddhism

Various Buddhist philosophical schools developed within Buddhism, giving various interpretations regarding more refined points of karma. A major problem is the relation between the doctrine of no-self, and the "storage" of the traces of one's deeds, for which various solutions have been offered.

Early Indian Buddhism

Origins

The concept of karma originated in the Vedic religion, where it was related to the performance of rituals or the investment in good deeds to ensure the entrance to heaven after death, while other persons go to the underworld.

Pre-sectarian Buddhism

Main article: Pre-sectarian Buddhism

The concept of karma may have been of minor importance in early Buddhism. Schmithausen has questioned whether karma already played a role in the theory of rebirth of earliest Buddhism, noting that "the karma doctrine may have been incidental to early Buddhist soteriology." Langer notes that originally karma may have been only one of several concepts connected with rebirth. Tillman Vetter notes that in early Buddhism rebirth is ascribed to craving or ignorance. Buswell too notes that "Early Buddhism does not identify bodily and mental motion, but desire (or thirst, trsna), as the cause of karmic consequences." Matthews notes that "there is no single major systematic exposition" on the subject of karma and "an account has to be put together from the dozens of places where karma is mentioned in the texts," which may mean that the doctrine was incidental to the main perspective of early Buddhist soteriology.

According to Vetter, "the Buddha at first sought, and realized, "the deathless" (amata/amrta), which is concerned with the here and now. Only after this realization did he become acquainted with the doctrine of rebirth." Bronkhorst disagrees, and concludes that the Buddha "introduced a concept of karma that differed considerably from the commonly held views of his time." According to Bronkhorst, not physical and mental activities as such were seen as responsible for rebirth, but intentions and desire.

The doctrine of karma may have been especially important for common people, for whom it was more important to cope with life's immediate demands, such as the problems of pain, injustice, and death. The doctrine of karma met these exigencies, and in time it became an important soteriological aim in its own right.

Vaibhāṣika-Sarvāstivādin tradition

See also: Vaibhāṣika and Sarvastivada

The Vaibhāśika-Sarvāstivāda was widely influential in India and beyond. Their understanding of karma in the Sarvāstivāda became normative for Buddhism in India and other countries. According to Dennis Hirota,

Sarvastivadins argued that there exists a dharma of "possession" (prapti), which functions with all karmic acts, so that each act or thought, though immediately passing away, creates the "possession" of that act in the continuum of instants we experience as a person. This possession itself is momentary, but continually reproduces a similar possession in the succeeding instant, even though the original act lies in the past. Through such continual regeneration, the act is "possessed" until the actualization of the result.

The Abhidharmahṛdaya by Dharmaśrī was the first systematic exposition of Vaibhāśika-Sarvāstivāda doctrine, and the third chapter, the Karma-varga, deals with the concept of karma systematically.

Another important exposition, the Mahāvibhāṣa, gives three definitions of karma:

  1. action; karma is here supplanted in the text by the synonyms kriya or karitra, both of which mean "activity";
  2. formal vinaya conduct;
  3. human action as the agent of various effects; karma as that which links certain actions with certain effects, is the primary concern of the exposition.

The 4th century philosopher Vasubandhu compiled the Abhidharma-kośa, an extensive compendium which elaborated the positions of the Vaibhāṣika-Sarvāstivādin school on a wide range of issues raised by the early sutras. Chapter four of the Kośa is devoted to a study of karma, and chapters two and five contain formulations as to the mechanism of fruition and retribution. This became the main source of understanding of the perspective of early Buddhism for later Mahāyāna philosophers.

Dārṣṭāntika-Sautrāntika

The Dārṣṭāntika-Sautrāntika school pioneered the idea of karmic seeds (S. Bīja) and "the special modification of the psycho-physical series" (S. saṃtatipaṇāmaviśeṣa) to explain the workings of karma. According to Dennis Hirota,

he Sautrantikas insisted that each act exists only in the present instant and perishes immediately. To explain causation, they taught that with each karmic act a "perfuming" occurs which, though not a dharma or existent factor itself, leaves a residual impression in the succeeding series of mental instants, causing it to undergo a process of subtle evolution eventually leading to the act’s result. Good and bad deeds performed are thus said to leave "seeds" or traces of disposition that will come to fruition.

Theravādin tradition

Canonical texts

In the Theravāda Abhidhamma and commentarial traditions, karma is taken up at length. The Abhidhamma Sangaha of Anuruddhācariya offers a treatment of the topic, with an exhaustive treatment in book five (5.3.7).

The Kathāvatthu, which discusses a number of controverted points related either directly or indirectly to the notion of kamma." This involved debate with the Pudgalavādin school, which postulated the provisional existence of the person (S. pudgala, P. puggala) to account for the ripening of karmic effects over time. The Kathāvatthu also records debate by the Theravādins with the Andhakas (who may have been Mahāsāṃghikas) regarding whether or not old age and death are the result (vipāka) of karma. The Theravāda maintained that they are not—not, apparently because there is no causal relation between the two, but because they wished to reserve the term vipāka strictly for mental results--"subjective phenomena arising through the effects of kamma."

In the canonical Theravāda view of kamma, "the belief that deeds done or ideas seized at the moment of death are particularly significant."

Transfer of merit

Main article: Transfer of merit

The Milindapañha, a paracanonical Theravāda text, offers some interpretations of karma theory at variance with the orthodox position. In particular, Nāgasena allows for the possibility of the transfer of merit to humans and one of the four classes of petas, perhaps in deference to folk belief. Nāgasena makes it clear that demerit cannot be transferred. One scholar asserts that the sharing of merit "can be linked to the Vedic śrāddha, for it was Buddhist practice not to upset existing traditions when well-established custom was not antithetic to Buddhist teaching."

The Petavatthu, which is fully canonical, endorses the transfer of merit even more widely, including the possibility of sharing merit with all petas.

Mahayana tradition

Indian Yogācāra tradition

In the Yogācāra philosophical tradition, one of the two principal Mahāyāna schools, the principle of karma was extended considerably. In the Yogācāra formulation, all experience without exception is said to result from the ripening of karma. Karmic seeds (S. bija) are said to be stored in the "storehouse consciousness" (S. ālayavijñāna) until such time as they ripen into experience. The term vāsāna ("perfuming") is also used, and Yogācārins debated whether vāsāna and bija were essentially the same, the seeds were the effect of the perfuming, or whether the perfuming simply affected the seeds. The seemingly external world is merely a "by-product" (adhipati-phala) of karma. The conditioning of the mind resulting from karma is called saṃskāra. The Treatise on Action (Karmasiddhiprakaraṇa), also by Vasubandhu, treats the subject of karma in detail from the Yogācāra perspective. According to scholar Dan Lusthaus,

Vasubandhu's Viṃśatikā (Twenty Verses) repeatedly emphasizes in a variety of ways that karma is intersubjective and that the course of each and every stream of consciousness (vijñāna-santāna, i.e., the changing individual) is profoundly influenced by its relations with other consciousness streams.

According to Bronkhorst, whereas in earlier systems it "was not clear how a series of completely mental events (the deed and its traces) could give rise to non-mental, material effects," with the (purported) idealism of the Yogācāra system this is not an issue.

In Mahāyāna traditions, karma is not the sole basis of rebirth. The rebirths of bodhisattvas after the seventh stage (S. bhūmi) are said to be consciously directed for the benefit of others still trapped in saṃsāra. Thus, theirs are not uncontrolled rebirths.

Mādhyamaka philosophy

Nāgārjuna articulated the difficulty in forming a karma theory in his most prominent work, the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way):

If (the act) lasted till the time of ripening, (the act) would be eternal. If (the act) were terminated, how could the terminated produce a fruit?

The Mūlamadhyamakavṛtty-Akutobhayā, also generally attributed to Nāgārjuna, concludes that it is impossible both for the act to persist somehow and also for it to perish immediately and still have efficacy at a later time.

Tibetan Buddhism

Main article: Karma in Tibetan Buddhism

In Tibetan Buddhism, the teachings on karma belong to the preliminary teachings, that turn the mind towards the Buddhist dharma.

In the Vajrayana tradition, negative past karma may be "purified" through such practices as meditation on Vajrasattva because they both are the mind's psychological phenomenon. The performer of the action, after having purified the karma, does not experience the negative results he or she otherwise would have. Engaging in the ten negative actions out of selfishness and delusions hurts all involved. Otherwise, loving others, receives love; whereas; people with closed hearts may be prevented from happiness. One good thing about karma is that it can be purified through confession, if the thoughts become positive. Within Guru Yoga seven branch offerings practice, confession is the antidote to aversion.

East Asian traditions

Zen
This section uses texts from within a religion or faith system without referring to secondary sources that critically analyze them. Please help improve this article. (October 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Dōgen Kigen argued in his Shobogenzo that karmic latencies are emphatically not empty, going so far as to claim that belief in the emptiness of karma should be characterized as "non-Buddhist," although he also states that the "law of karman has no concrete existence."

Zen's most famous koan about karma is called Baizhang's Wild Fox (百丈野狐). The story of the koan is about an ancient Zen teacher whose answer to a question presents a wrong view about karma by saying that the person who has a foundation in cultivating the great practice "does not fall into cause and effect." Because of his unskillful answer the teacher reaps the result of living 500 lives as a wild fox. He is then able to appear as a human and ask the same question to Zen teacher Baizhang, who answers, "He is not in the dark about cause and effect." Hearing this answer the old teacher is freed from the life of a wild fox. The Zen perspective avoids the duality of asserting that an enlightened person is either subject to or free from the law of karma and that the key is not being ignorant about karma.

Tendai

The Japanese Tendai/Pure Land teacher Genshin taught a series of ten reflections for a dying person that emphasized reflecting on the Amida Buddha as a means to purify vast amounts of karma.

Nichiren Buddhism

Nichiren Buddhism teaches that transformation and change through faith and practice changes adverse karma—negative causes made in the past that result in negative results in the present and future—to positive causes for benefits in the future.

Modern interpretations and controversies

Social conditioning

Buddhist modernists often prefer to equate karma with social conditioning, in contradistinction with, as one scholar puts it, "early texts give us little reason to interpret 'conditioning' as the infusion into the psyche of external social norms, or of awakening as simply transcending all psychological conditioning and social roles. Karmic conditioning drifts semantically toward 'cultural conditioning' under the influence of western discourses that elevate the individual over the social, cultural, and institutional. The traditional import of the karmic conditioning process, however, is primarily ethical and soteriological—actions condition circumstances in this and future lives."

Essentially, this understanding limits the scope of the traditional understanding of karmic effects so that it encompasses only saṃskāras—habits, dispositions and tendencies—and not external effects, while at the same time expanding the scope to include social conditioning that does not particularly involve volitional action.

Karma theory and social justice

Some western commentators and Buddhists have taken exception to aspects of karma theory, and have proposed revisions of various kinds. These proposals fall under the rubric of Buddhist modernism.

The "primary critique" of the Buddhist doctrine of karma is that some feel "karma may be socially and politically disempowering in its cultural effect, that without intending to do this, karma may in fact support social passivity or acquiescence in the face of oppression of various kinds." Dale S. Wright, a scholar specializing in Zen Buddhism, has proposed that the doctrine be reformulated for modern people, "separated from elements of supernatural thinking," so that karma is asserted to condition only personal qualities and dispositions rather than rebirth and external occurrences.

Loy argues that the idea of accumulating merit too easily becomes "spiritual materialism," a view echoed by other Buddhist modernists, and further that karma has been used to rationalize racism, caste, economic oppression, birth handicaps and everything else.

Loy goes on to argue that the view that suffering such as that undergone by Holocaust victims could be attributed in part to the karmic ripenings of those victims is "fundamentalism, which blames the victims and rationalizes their horrific fate," and that this is "something no longer to be tolerated quietly. It is time for modern Buddhists and modern Buddhism to outgrow it" by revising or discarding the teachings on karma.

Other scholars have argued, however, that the teachings on karma do not encourage judgment and blame, given that the victims were not the same people who committed the acts, but rather were just part of the same mindstream-continuum with the past actors, and that the teachings on karma instead provide "a thoroughly satisfying explanation for suffering and loss" in which believers take comfort.

See also

Buddhism
Indian religions
Other

Notes

  1. In common Tibetan common speech, the term las, "karma", is often used to denote the entire process of karma-and-fruit.
  2. Sanskrit, punaraāvŗtti, punarutpatti, punarjanman, or punarjīlvātu
  3. In early Buddhism rebirth is ascribed to craving or ignorance, and the theory of karma may have been of minor importance in early Buddhist soteriology.
  4. There are many different translation of the above quote into English. For example, Peter Harvey translates the quote as follows: "It is will (cetana), O monks, that I call karma; having willed, one acts through body, speech, and mind." (A.III.415).
  5. Sutta-nipata verse 1366
  6. For example, the Sautrāntika, a subsect of the Sarvastivada, the most important of the early Buddhist schools, regarded the intention to be the stimulus for karma, action which leads to consequences. The Vaibhāṣika, the other sub-sect of the Sarvastivada, separated the intention from the act, regarding intention as karma proper.
  7. In the Abhidharma they are referred to by specific names for the sake of clarity, karmic causes being the "cause of results" (S. vipāka-hetu) and the karmic results being the "resultant fruit" (S. vipāka-phala).
  8. See also Saṅkhāra
  9. For bīja, see also Yogacara#Karma, seeds and storehouse-consciousness
  10. The twelvefold chain as we know it is the result of a gradual development. Shorter versions are also known. According to Schumann, the twelvefold chain may be a combination of three succeeding lives, each one of them shown by some of the samkaras.
  11. See also Sivaka Sutta (Samyutta Nikaya 36.21), in which the Buddha mentions eight different possible causes from which feelings can arise. Only the eighth cause can be ascribed to karma.
  12. Dasgupta explains that in Indian philosophy, acintya is "that which is to be unavoidably accepted for explaining facts, but which cannot stand the scrutiny of logic." See also the Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta, "Discourse to Vatsagotra on the Fire," Majjhima Nikaya 72, in which the Buddha is questioned by Vatsagotra on the "ten indeterminate question," and the Buddha explains that a Tathagata is like a fire that has been extinguished, and is "deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the sea".
  13. The understanding of rebirth, and the reappearance in accordance with one's deeds, are the first two knowledges that the Buddha is said to have acquired at his enlightenment, as described in Majjhima Nikaya 36.
  14. Bronkhorst is following Schmithausen, who, in his often-cited article On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism, notes that the mention of the four noble truths as constituting "liberating insight", which is attained after mastering the Rupa Jhanas, is a later addition to texts such as Majjhima Nikaya 36. It calls in question the reliability of these accounts, and the relation between dhyana and insight, which is a core problem in the study of early Buddhism. According to Tilmann Vetter, originally only the practice of dhyana, and the resulting calming of the mind may have constituted the liberating practice of the lord Buddha.
  15. Langer: "When I was searching the Sanskrit texts for material, two things become apparent: first, rebirth, central as it is to Indian philosophy, is not found in the earliest texts; and second, rebirth and karman do not appear to be linked together from the beginning. In fact, originally karman seems to have been only one of several concepts connected with rebirth, but in the course of time it proved to be more popular than others. One of these ‘other concepts’ linked with rebirth is a curious notion of ‘rebirth according to one’s wish’, sometimes referred to in the texts as kAmacAra. The wish — variously referred to in the texts as kAma or kratu — is directed to a particular form or place of rebirth and can be spontaneous (at the time of death) or cultivated for a long time. This understanding seems to have some affinity with the Buddhist notion that a mental effort, a positive state of mind, can bring about a good rebirth."
  16. Stanislaw Schayer, a Polish scholar, argued in the 1930s that the Nikayas preserve elements of an archaic form of Buddhism which is close to Brahmanical beliefs, and survived in the Mahayana tradition. According to Schayer, one of these elements is that Nirvana was conceived as the attainment of immortality, and the gaining of a deathless sphere from which there would be no falling back. According to Falk, in the precanonical tradition, there is a threefold division of reality, the third realm being the realm of nirvana, the "amrta sphere," characterized by prajna. This nirvana is an "abode" or "place" which is gained by the enlightened holy man. According to Falk, this scheme is reflected in the precanonical conception of the path to liberation. The nirvanic element, as an "essence" or pure consciousness, is immanent within samsara. The three bodies are concentric realities, which are stripped away or abandoned, leaving only the nirodhakaya of the liberated person. See also Rita Langer (2007), Buddhist Rituals of Death and Rebirth: Contemporary Sri Lankan Practice and Its Origins, p.26-28, on "redeath" (punarmrtyu).
  17. Tilmann Vetter, Das Erwachen des Buddha, referenced by Bronkhorst.
  18. Mūlamadhyamakavṛtty-Akutobhayā, sDe dge Tibetan Tripitaka (Tokyo, 1977) pp. 32, 4.5, cited in Dargyay, 1986, p.170.
  19. Ken Jones, The Social Face of Buddhism: An Approach to Political and Social Activism, Wisdom Publications, 1989, quoted in "A Buddhist Ethic Without Karmic Rebirth?" by Winston L. King Journal of Buddhist Ethics Volume 1 1994

Quotes

  1. Rupert Gethin: " a being’s intentional 'actions' of body, speech, and mind—whatever is done, said, or even just thought with definite intention or volition"; "t root karma or 'action' is considered a mental act or intention; it is an aspect of our mental life: 'It is "intention" that I call karma; having formed the intention, one performs acts (karma) by body, speech and mind.'"
  2. Gombrich: "Bodily and verbal action manifested one’s intention to others and therefore were called vijñapti, ‘information’."
  3. Karma and samsara:
    • Peter Harvey: "The movement of beings between rebirths is not a haphazard process but is ordered and governed by the law of karma, the principle that beings are reborn according to the nature and quality of their past actions; they are 'heir' to their actions (M.III.123)."
    • Damien Keown: "In the cosmology , karma functions as the elevator that takes people from one floor of the building to another. Good deeds result in an upward movement and bad deeds in a downward one. Karma is not a system of rewards and punishments meted out by God but a kind of natural law akin to the law of gravity. Individuals are thus the sole authors of their good and bad fortune."
    • Alexander Berzin: "In short, the external and internal cycles of time delineate samsara – uncontrollably recurring rebirth, fraught with problems and difficulties. These cycles are driven by impulses of energy, known in the Kalachakra system as "winds of karma." Karma is a force intimately connected with mind and arises due to confusion about reality."
    • Paul Williams: "All rebirth is due to karman and is impermanent. Short of attaining enlightenment, in each rebirth one is born and dies, to be reborn elsewhere in accordance with the completely impersonal causal nature of one's own karman. The endless cycle of birth, rebirth, and redeath, is samsara."
  4. Wholesome and unwholesome actions:
    • Ringu Tulku: "We create in three different ways, through actions that are positive, negative, or neutral. When we feel kindness and love and with this attitude do good things, which are beneficial to both ourselves and others, this is positive action. When we commit harmful deeds out of equally harmful intentions, this is negative action. Finally, when our motivation is indifferent and our deeds are neither harmful or beneficial, this is neutral action. The results we experience will accord with the quality of our actions."
    • Gethin: ebirth in the lower realms is considered to be the result of relatively unwholesome (akuśala/akusala), or bad (pāpa) karma, while rebirth in the higher realms the result of relatively wholesome (kuśala/kusala), or good (puṇya/puñña) karma.
  5. Dargray: "When understanding of karma is correlated to the Buddhist doctrine of universal impermanence and No-Self, a serious problem arises as to where this trace is stored and what the trace left is. The problem is aggravated when the trace remains latent over a long period, perhaps over a period of many existences. The crucial problem presented to all schools of Buddhist philosophy was where the trace is stored and how it can remain in the ever-changing stream of phenomena which build up the individual and what the nature of this trace is."
  6. Seed and fruit:
    • Peter Harvey: "Karma is often likened to a seed, and the two words for karmic result, vipaka and phala, respectively mean 'ripening' and 'fruit'. An action is thus like a seed which will sooner or later, as part of its natural maturation process, result in certain fruits accruing to the doer of the action."
    • Ken McLeod: "Karma, then, describes how our actions evolve into experience, internally and externally. Each action is a seed which grows or evolves into our experience of the world. Every action either starts a new growth process or reinforces an old one as described by the four results.
  7. Thanissaro Bhikkhu: "Unlike the theory of linear causality — which led the Vedists and Jains to see the relationship between an act and its result as predictable and tit-for-tat — the principle of this/that conditionality makes that relationship inherently complex. The results of kamma experienced at any one point in time come not only from past kamma, but also from present kamma. This means that, although there are general patterns relating habitual acts to corresponding results , there is no set one-for-one, tit-for-tat, relationship between a particular action and its results. Instead, the results are determined by the context of the act, both in terms of actions that preceded or followed it and in terms one’s state of mind at the time of acting or experiencing the result . The feedback loops inherent in this/that conditionality mean that the working out of any particular cause-effect relationship can be very complex indeed. This explains why the Buddha says in AN 4:77 that the results of kamma are imponderable. Only a person who has developed the mental range of a Buddha—another imponderable itself—would be able to trace the intricacies of the kammic network. The basic premise of kamma is simple—that skillful intentions lead to favorable results, and unskillful ones to unfavorable results—but the process by which those results work themselves out is so intricate that it cannot be fully mapped. We can compare this with the Mandelbrot set, a mathematical set generated by a simple equation, but whose graph is so complex that it will probably never be completely explored."
  8. Sivaka Sutta (Samyutta Nikaya 36.21): "So any brahmans & contemplatives who are of the doctrine & view that whatever an individual feels — pleasure, pain, neither-pleasure-nor-pain — is entirely caused by what was done before — slip past what they themselves know, slip past what is agreed on by the world. Therefore I say that those brahmans & contemplatives are wrong."
  9. Not a system of reward and punishment:
    • Damien Keown: "Karma is not a system of rewards and punishments meted out by God but a kind of natural law akin to the law of gravity. Individuals are thus the sole authors of their good and bad fortune."
    • Peter Harvey states: - "The law of karma is seen as a natural law inherent in the nature of things, like the law of physics. It is not operated by a God, and indeed the gods are themselves under its sway. Good and bad rebirths are not, therefore, seen as "rewards" and "punishments", but as simply the natural results of certain kinds of action."
    • Dzongsar Khyentse: " is usually understood as a sort of moralistic system of retribution—"bad" karma and "good" karma. But karma is simply a law of cause and effect, not to be confused with morality or ethics. No one, including Buddha, set the fundamental bar for what is negative and what is positive. Any motivation and action that steer us away from such truths as "all compounded things are impermanent" can result in negative consequences, or bad karma. And any action that brings us closer to understanding such truths as "all emotions are pain" can result in positive consequences, or good karma. At the end of the day, it was not for Buddha to judge; only you can truly know the motivation behind your actions."
    • Khandro Rinpoche states: "Buddhism is a nontheistic philosophy. We do not believe in a creator but in the causes and conditions that create certain circumstances that then come to fruition. This is called karma. It has nothing to do with judgement; there is no one keeping track of our karma and sending us up above or down below. Karma is simply the wholeness of a cause, or first action, and its effect, or fruition, which then becomes another cause. In fact, one karmic cause can have many fruitions, all of which can cause thousands more creations. Just as a handful of seed can ripen into a full field of grain, a small amount of karma can generate limitless effects."
    • Walpola Rahula states: "The theory of karma should not be confused with so-called 'moral justice’ or 'reward and punishment’. The idea of moral justice, or reward and punishment, arises out of the conception of a supreme being, a God, who sits in judgment, who is a law-giver and who decides what is right and wrong. The term 'justice’ is ambiguous and dangerous, and in its name more harm than good is done to humanity. The theory of karma is the theory of cause and effect, of action and reaction; it is a natural law, which has nothing to do with the idea of justice or reward and punishment. Every volitional action produces its effects or results. If a good action produces good effects and a bad action bad effects, it is not justice, or reward, or punishment meted out by anybody or any power sitting in judgment on your action, but this is in virtue of its own nature, its own law."
  10. Rupert Gethin: "From the Buddhist perspective certain experiences in life are indeed the results of previous actions; but our responses to those experiences, whether wished for or unwished for, are not predetermined but represent new actions which in time bear their own fruit in the future. The Buddhist understanding of individual responsibility does not mean that we should never seek or expect another’s assistance in order to better cope with the troubles of life. The belief that one’s broken leg is at one level to be explained as the result of unwholesome actions performed in a previous life does not mean that one should not go to a doctor to have the broken leg set."

Subnotes

  1. In the Tibetan tradition, a karmic action grows into four results: the result of full ripening, the result from what happened, the result from what acted, and the environmental result.
  2. Thanissaro Bhikkhu uses the Pali spelling for karma.
  3. MMK (XVII.6), cited in Dargyay, 1986, p.170

References

  1. ^ Padmakara Translation Group 1994, p. 101.
  2. Chapple 1986, p. 2.
  3. Lichter & Epstein 1983, p. 232.
  4. ^ Kalupahana 1992, p. 166.
  5. ^ Keown 2000, pp. 36–37.
  6. ^ Gombrich 2009, p. 19.
  7. Kopf 2001, p. 141.
  8. ^ Kragh 2006, p. 11.
  9. Keown 2000, p. 810-813.
  10. Klostermaier 1986, p. 93.
  11. Keown 2000, p. 37.
  12. Lamotte 1987, p. 15.
  13. Bucknell 1984.
  14. ^ Buswell 2004, p. 712.
  15. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxi.
  16. ^ Buswell 2004, p. 416.
  17. ^ Matthews 1986, p. 124.
  18. ^ Schmithausen 1986, pp. 206–207.
  19. ^ Bronkhorst 1998, p. 13.
  20. ^ Bronkhorst 1998.
  21. Gethin 1998, pp. 119–120.
  22. ^ Gethin 1998, p. 119.
  23. Gethin 1998, p. 120.
  24. ^ Gombrich 1997, p. 55.
  25. ^ Harvey 1990, pp. 39–40.
  26. Gombrich 1997, p. 51.
  27. Gombrich 1996, pp. 65–66.
  28. Gombrich 1996, p. 68.
  29. ^ Gombrich 1997, pp. 54–55.
  30. Gombrich 1997, p. 54.
  31. Reichenbach 1988, p. 399.
  32. Waldron 2003, p. 61.
  33. ^ Reichenbach 1990, p. 1.
  34. Harvey 1990, p. 39.
  35. Keown 2000, Kindle Location 794-797.
  36. Williams 2002, p. 74.
  37. Ringu Tulku 2005, p. 31.
  38. Vetter 1988, p. 84.
  39. Vetter 1988, p. 85.
  40. ^ Dargyay 1986, p. 170.
  41. Vetter 1988, p. 52, note 8.
  42. Bronkhorst 1998, p. 12.
  43. Harvey 1990, p. 40.
  44. ^ Schumann 1997, pp. 88–92.
  45. Kalupahana 1975, p. 127.
  46. ^ Gombrich 2009, p. 20.
  47. Harvey 1990, p. 42.
  48. Kalupahana 1975, p. 131.
  49. Keown 2000, pp. 794–796.
  50. Keown 2000, Kindle loc. 794-796.
  51. Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse 2012, p. 76.
  52. Khandro Rinpoche 2003, p. 95.
  53. Walpola Rahula 2007, Kindle Locations 860-866.
  54. ^ Gethin 1998, p. 27.
  55. Gethin 1998, pp. 153–154.
  56. Gombrich 2009, pp. 21–22.
  57. Vetter 1988, pp. 79–80.
  58. ^ Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 14.
  59. Dasgupta 1991, p. 16.
  60. ^ Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 852.
  61. ^ Gombrich 2009, pp. 20–22.
  62. Vetter 1987, pp. 50–52.
  63. Vetter 1988, pp. 80–82.
  64. Gombrich 1991.
  65. ^ Matthews 1986, p. 125.
  66. ^ Collins 1999, p. 120.
  67. Vetter 1988, p. 79.
  68. Goldstein 2011, p. 74.
  69. ^ Bronkhorst 1993.
  70. ^ Vetter 1988.
  71. Schmithausen et al. 1981.
  72. Gombrich 1997.
  73. McDermott 1980, p. 175.
  74. ^ McDermott 1984, p. 21.
  75. SN.4.132
  76. ^ Lamotte 2001, p. 18.
  77. ^ Samuel 2010.
  78. ^ Vetter 1988, p. 78.
  79. ^ Schmithausen 1986.
  80. ^ Langer 2007, p. 26.
  81. Lindtner 1997; Lindtner 1999; Akizuki 1990, pp. 25–27; Ray 1999, p. .
  82. Reat 1998, p. xi.
  83. Conze 1967, p. 10.
  84. Ray 1999, pp. 374–377.
  85. ^ Ray 1999, p. 375.
  86. Langer 2007, pp. 26–28.
  87. ^ Bronkhorst 1998, p. 3.
  88. Bronkhorst 1998, p. 16.
  89. Bronkhorst 1998, p. 14.
  90. Ryose 1987, p. 3.
  91. ^ Hirota 2004, p. 5100.
  92. Ryose 1987, pp. 3–4.
  93. Ryose 1987, pp. 39–40.
  94. Lamotte 2001.
  95. Park 2007, pp. 234–236.
  96. Matthews 1986, p. 132.
  97. ^ McDermott 1975, p. 424.
  98. ^ McDermott 1975, pp. 426–427.
  99. McDermott 1980, p. 168.
  100. McDermott 1984, p. 110.
  101. ^ McDermott 1984, pp. 109–111.
  102. McDermott 1977, p. 463.
  103. McDermott 1977, p. 462.
  104. Harvey 2000, p. 297.
  105. Lusthaus 2002, p. 194.
  106. ^ Lusthaus 2002, p. 48.
  107. Lamotte 2001, pp. 13, 35.
  108. Bronkhorst 2000.
  109. ^ Harvey 2000, p. 130.
  110. Huntington 1986, p. 4.
  111. Norgay 2014, p. v.
  112. Kalu Rinpoche 1993, p. 204.
  113. ^ Zopa Rinpoche 2004, p. ix.
  114. Thrangu Rinpoche 2012, pp. 20–21.
  115. Patrul Rinpoche 2011, pp. 264–265.
  116. Dōgen 1975, pp. 142, 149.
  117. Lopez 2001, p. 239.
  118. Fowler & Fowler 2009, p. 78.
  119. ^ McMahan 2008, p. 198.
  120. McMahan 2008, p. 174.
  121. Wright 2004, p. 81.
  122. Wright 2004, pp. 89–90.
  123. Loy 2008, p. 57.
  124. Loy 2008, p. 55.
  125. ^ Burke 2003, pp. 32–33.

Sources

Printed sources

Sutta Pitaka

  • The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya, translated by Bodhi, Bhikkhu, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2000, ISBN 0-86171-331-1
  • The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya, translated by Nanamoli, Bhikkhu, Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1995, ISBN 0-86171-072-X

Buddhist teachers

  • Dalai Lama (1998), The Four Noble Truths, Thorsons
  • Dōgen, Kigen (1975), Shobogenzo: The Eye and Treasury of the True Law, Vol. 1, Kosen Nishiyama and John Stevens (translators), Sendai, Japan: Daihokkaikaku Publishing Co.
  • Dzongsar Jamyang Khyentse (2012), Not for Happiness, A Guide to the So-Called Preliminary Practices, Shambala Publications, ISBN 978-1-61180-030-2
  • Geshe Tashi Tsering (2005), The Four Noble Truths: The Foundation of Buddhist Thought, Volume I, Wisdom, Kindle Edition
  • Goldstein, Joseph (2011), One Dharma: The Emerging Western Buddhism, HarperCollins, Kindle Edition
  • Goldstein, Joseph (2013), Mindfulness: A Practical Guide to Awakening, Sounds True, Kindle Edition
  • Kalu Rinpoche (1993), Luminous Mind: The Way of the Buddha, Wisdom, ISBN 0-86171-118-1
  • Kamenetz, Rodger (1995), Jew in the Lotus: A Poet's Re-Discovery of Jewish Identity in Buddhist India, HarperOne
  • Khandro Rinpoche (2003), This Precious Life, Shambhala
  • Khenchen Konchog Gyaltshen (2009), A Complete Guide to the Buddhist Path, Snow Lion
  • Lama Surya Das (1997), Awakening the Buddha Within, Broadway Books, Kindle Edition
  • Leif, Judith (2009), Introduction to 'The Truth of Suffering and the Path of Liberation' by Chogyam Trungpa (edited by Judy Leif), Shambhala
  • Mingyur Rinpoche (2007), The Joy of Living: Unlocking the Secret and Science of Happiness, Harmony Kindle Edition
  • Moffitt, Philip (2008), Dancing with Life: Buddhist Insights for Finding Meaning and Joy in the Face of Suffering, Rodale, Kindle Edition
  • Padmakara Translation Group (1994), The Words of My Perfect teacher, HarperCollins Publishers India
  • Patrul Rinpoche (2011), The Words of My Perfect Teacher, First University Press Edition, ISBN 978-0-300-16532-6
  • P. A. Payutto (1993), "Misunderstandings of The Law of Kamma", Good, Evil and Beyond: Kamma in the Buddha's Teaching, www.buddhanet.net, archived from the original on October 4, 2013
  • Ringu Tulku (2005), Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism, Snow Lion
  • Ringu Tulku (2012), Confusion Arises as Wisdom: Gampopa's Heart Advice on the Path of Mahamudra, Shambhala, Kindle Edition.
  • Sonam Rinchen (2006), How Karma Works: The Twelve Links of Dependent Arising, Snow Lion
  • Thubten Jinpa (2014), Mind Training: The Great Collection (Kindle Edition), Wisdom
  • Thrangu Rinpoche (2001), The Twelve Links of Interdependent Origination, Snow Lion
  • Thrangu Rinpoche (2012), Pointing Out The Dharmakaya: Teachings On The Ninth Karmapa's Text, Nama Buddha
  • Traleg Kyabgon (2001), The Essence of Buddhism, Shambhala
  • Tsongkhapa (2000), Cutler, Joshua W. C. (ed.), The Great Treatise On The Stages Of The Path To Enlightenment Vol 1, Snow Lion
  • Walpola Rahula (2007), What the Buddha Taught (Kindle ed.), Grove Press
  • Zopa Rinpoche, Lama Thubten (2004), Nicholas Ribush (ed.), Becoming Vajrasattva: the tantric path of purification / Lama Tubten Yeshe, Wisdom Publications, ISBN 0-86171-389-3

Scholarly sources

  • Akizuki, Ryōmin (1990), New Mahāyāna: Buddhism for a Post-modern World, Jain Publishing Company
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1998), "Did the Buddha Believe in Karma and Rebirth?", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 21 (1): 1–20
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (2000), "Karma and Teleology: A Problem and its Solutions in Indian Philosophy", Studia Philologica, Monograph Series, vol. XV, Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies, archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-04-07
  • Bucknell, Rod (1984), "The Buddhist Path to Liberation: An Analysis of the Listing of Stages", The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7 (2)
  • Burke, Erin (2003), "Karmic Calculations: The Social Implications of Karmic Causality in Tibet", Chrestomathy: Annual Review of Undergraduate Research at the College of Charleston, Volume 2, 2003
  • Buswell, Robert E., ed. (2004), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Macmillan Reference USA
  • Buswell, Robert E.; Lopez, Donald S. Jr., eds. (2013), The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism, Princeton University Press
  • Chapple, Christopher (1986), Karma and Creativity, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-88706-250-4
  • Collins, Steven (1999), Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada Buddhism, Cambridge University Press
  • Conze, Edward (1967), Thirty years of Buddhis Studies. Selected essays by Edward Conze (PDF), Bruno Cassirer
  • Dargyay, Lobsang (1986), "Tsong-Kha-Pa's Concept of Karma", in Neufeldt (ed.), Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-87395-990-6
  • Dasgupta, Surendranath (1991), A History of Indian Philosophy, Volume 4, Motilal Banarsidass
  • Dowling, Thomas L. (2006), "Karma Doctrine and Sectarian Development", in Narain, A.K. (ed.), Studies in Pali and Buddhism: A Memorial Volume in Honour of Bhikku Jagdish Kashyap, B.R. Publishing Corporation
  • Fowler, Jeaneane; Fowler, Merv (2009). Chanting in the Hillsides. Portland, Oregon: Sussex Academic Press.
  • Garfield, Jay L. (1995), The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika, Oxford University Press
  • Garfield, Jay (2013), "Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose: Freedom, Agency and Ethics for Madhyamikas", in Dasti, Matthew R.; Bryant, Edwin F. (eds.), Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy, Oxford University Press
  • Gethin, Rupert (1998), Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford University Press
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1991), Buddhist Precept and Practice. Traditional Buddhism in the Rural Highlands of Ceylon, Motilall Banarsidass
  • Gombrich, Richard (1996), Theravada Buddhism. A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo, Routledge
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1997), How Buddhism Began. The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings, New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
  • Gombrich, Richard (2009), What the Buddha Thought, Equinox
  • Goodman, Steven D. (1992), "Situational Patterning: Pratītyasamutpāda", in Tarthang Tulku (ed.), Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments, Crystal Mirror Series I-III, Dharma Publishing
  • Harvey, Peter (1990), Introduction to Buddhism, Cambridge University Press
  • Harvey, Brian Peter (1995), The Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvāṇa in Early Buddhism, Routledge, ISBN 0-7007-0338-1
  • Harvey, Brian Peter (2000), An Introduction to Buddhist ethics: Foundations, Values, and Issues, Routledge, ISBN 0-521-55640-6
  • Hirota, Dennis (2004), "Karman: Buddhist concepts", in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion (2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference USA
  • Huntington, Clair W. Jr. (1986), The "Akutobhaya" and early Indian Madhyamika (Volumes I and II) (Buddhism, India, China, Tibet). Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan
  • Huntington, John C.; Bangdel, Dina (2003), The Circle of Bliss: Buddhist Meditational Art, Serindia
  • Kalupahana, David (1975), Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism, University of Hawaii Press
  • Kalupahana, David J. (1992), The Principles of Buddhist Psychology, Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications
  • Kalupahana, David (1995), Ethics in Early Buddhism, University of Hawaii Press
  • Keown, Damien (2000), Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Kindle Edition
  • Klostermaier, Klaus K. (1986), "Contemporary Conceptions of Karma and Rebirth Among North Indian Vaisnavas", in Neufeldt, Ronald W. (ed.), Karma and Rebirth: Post-classical Developments, Sri Satguru Publications
  • Kopf, Gereon (2001), Beyond Personal Identity: Dōgen, Nishida, and a Phenomenology of No-self, Psychology Press
  • Kragh, Ulrich Timme (2006), Early Buddhist Theories of Action and Result: A Study of Karmaphalasambandha, Candrakirti's Prasannapada, verses 17.1-20, Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien, ISBN 3-902501-03-0
  • Lamotte, Etienne (1987), Karmasiddhi Prakarana: The Treatise on Action by Vasubandhu, Asian Humanities Press
  • Lamotte, Etienne (1988), History of Indian Buddhism, Publications de l'Institut Orientaliste de Louvain
  • Lamotte, Etienne (2001), Karmasiddhi Prakarana: The Treatise on Action by Vasubandhu, English translation by Leo M. Pruden, Asian Humanities Press
  • Langer, Rita (2007), Buddhist Rituals of Death and Rebirth: Contemporary Sri Lankan Practice and Its Origins, Routledge
  • Lichter, David; Epstein, Lawrence (1983), "Irony in Tibetan Notions of the Good Life", in Keyes, Charles F.; Daniel, E. Valentien (eds.), Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, University of California Press
  • Lindtner, Christian (1997), "The Problem of Precanonical Buddhism", Buddhist Studies Review, 14 (2): 2, doi:10.1558/bsrv.v14i2.14851, S2CID 247883744
  • Lindtner, Christian (1999), "From Brahmanism to Buddhism", Asian Philosophy, 9 (1): 5–37, doi:10.1080/09552369908575487
  • Lopez, Donald S. (2001), The Story of Buddhism, HarperCollins
  • Loy, David R. (2008), Money, Sex, War, Karma: Notes for a Buddhist Revolution, Wisdom, ISBN 978-0861715589
  • Lusthaus, Dan (2002), Buddhist Phenomenology: A philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Ch'eng Wei-shih lun, RoutledgeCurzon, ISBN 0-415-40610-2
  • Macy, Joanna (1991), Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory: The Dharma of Natural Systems, SUNY
  • Matthews, Bruce (1986), "Chapter Seven: Post-Classical Developments in the Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada Buddhism", in Neufeldt, Ronald W. (ed.), Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-87395-990-6
  • McDermott, James Paul (1975), "The Kathāvatthu Kamma Debates", Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 95, no. 3, Jul. – Sep., 1975
  • McDermott, James Paul (1977), "Kamma in the Milindapañha", Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 97, no. 4, Oct. – Dec., 1977
  • McDermott, James P. (1980), "Karma and Rebirth in Early Buddhism", in O'Flaherty, Wendy Doniger (ed.), Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions, University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-03923-8
  • McDermott, James Paul (1984), Development in the Early Buddhist Concept of Kamma/Karma, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, ISBN 81-215-0208-X
  • McMahan, David L. (2008), The Making of Buddhist Modernism, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-518327-6
  • Monier-Williams (1964) , A Sanskrit-English Dictionary (PDF), London: Oxford University Press, retrieved 27 December 2008
  • Norgay, Khenpo Tenzin (2014), Dusting Off Your Buddha Nature: The Purpose of the Dzogchen Preliminaries, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, ISBN 978-1505587319
  • Padma, Sree; Barber, A.W., eds. (2009), Buddhism in the Krishna River Valley of Andhra, State University of New York Press
  • Park, Changhwan (2007), The Sautrantika Theory of Seeds (bija) Revisited (PhD thesis), University of California, Berkeley
  • Ray, Reginald (1999), Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations, Oxford University Press
  • Reat, N. Ross (1998), The Salistamba Sutra, Motilal Banarsidass
  • Reichenbach, Bruce (1988), "The Law of Karma and the Principle of Causation", Philosophy East and West, 38 (4): 399–410, doi:10.2307/1399118, JSTOR 1399118
  • Reichenbach, Bruce (1990), The Law of Karma: A Philosophical Study, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 0-8248-1352-9
  • Ronkin, Noa (2005), Early Buddhist Metaphysics: the Making of a Philosophical Tradition, Routledge, ISBN 0-203-53706-8
  • Ryose, Wataru (1987), A Study of the Abhidharmahrdaya: The Historical Development of the Concept of Karma In The Sarvastivada Thought (PDF) (PhD thesis), University of Wisconsin-Madison, archived from the original (PDF) on November 16, 2014
  • Rhys Davids, Caroline Augusta (2007), Buddhism, Davids Press
  • Samuel, Geoffrey (2010), The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press
  • Schumann, Hans Wolfgang (1997), Boeddhisme. Stichter, scholen en systemen, Asoka
  • Schmithausen, Lambert; Wezler, Albrecht; Bruhn, Klaus; Alsdorf, Ludwig (1981). "On some aspects of descriptions or theories of 'liberating insight' and 'enlightenment' in early Buddhism". Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus. Alt- und neu-indische Studien. Vol. 23. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. ISBN 9783515028745. OCLC 1086295202.
  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1986), "Critical Response", in Ronald W. Neufeldt (ed.), Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments, SUNY
  • Simmer-Brown, Judith (1987), "Seeing the Dependent Origination of Suffering as the Key to Liberation", Journal of Contemplative Psychotherapy, no. 4, The Naropa Institute
  • Smith, Huston; Novak, Philip (2009), Buddhism: A Concise Introduction (Kindle ed.), HarperOne
  • Vetter, Tillman (1987), "Some remarks on older parts of the Suttanipiita", in Seyfort Ruegg, Seyfort; Schmithausen, Lambert (eds.), Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka, BRILL
  • Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, BRILL
  • Waldron, William S. (2003), The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought, Routledge
  • Walser, Joseph (2005), Nāgārjuna in Context: Mahāyāna Buddhism and Early Indian Culture, Columbia University Press
  • Wardner, A.K. (1970), Indian Buddhism
  • Watson, Burton (1993), The Lotus Sutra, Columbia University Press
  • Williams, Paul (2002), Buddhist Thought (Kindle ed.), Taylor & Francis
  • Williams, Paul, ed. (2005), Buddhism—Critical Concepts in Religious Studies II, Shi Huifeng
  • Wright, Dale S. (2004), "Critical Questions Towards a Naturalized Concept of Karma in Buddhism", Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 11

Web-sources

  1. Thanissaro Bhikkhu, trans. (1997). Nibbedhika Sutta: Penetrative, AN 6.63, PTS: A iii 410
  2. Alexander Berzin, Overview of Kalachakra
  3. ^ Thubten Chodron (1993). The Twelve Links – Part 2 of 5 (PDF)
  4. ^ "Karma | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com.
  5. What is Karma? p.2, Ken McLeod
  6. ^ "Wings to Awakening: Part I" (PDF). www.accesstoinsight.org. Translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Valley Center, CA: Metta Forest Monastery. 2010. pp. 47–48.
  7. "What Is Karma?". studybuddhism.com.
  8. "Acintita Sutta: Unconjecturable". www.accesstoinsight.org.
  9. ^ "Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta: To Vacchagotta on Fire". www.accesstoinsight.org. Translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.

Further reading

Scholarly sources
  • Neufeldt, Ronald W., ed. (1986), Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments, SUNY
  • Gananath Obeyesekere (2002). Imagining karma: ethical transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek rebirth. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23243-3.
  • Gethin, Rupert (1998). Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-289223-1.
Journal
Primary sources
  • Dalai Lama (1992). The Meaning of Life, translated and edited by Jeffrey Hopkins. Wisdom.
  • Geshe Sonam Rinchen (2006). How Karma Works: The Twelve Links of Dependent Arising. Snow Lion
  • Khandro Rinpoche (2003). This Precious Life. Shambala
  • Ringu Tulku (2005). Daring Steps Toward Fearlessness: The Three Vehicles of Tibetan Buddhism. Snow Lion.

External links

General
Sarvastivada
Theravada
Yogacara
Nyingma
   Topics in Buddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Category: