| Revision as of 04:12, 21 November 2014 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 edits Undid revision 634775780 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk)revert archiving to answer← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015 view source Jehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Neotarf: User request within own user space ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (45 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 256K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| {{noindex}} | |||
| |algo = old(24h) | |||
| | minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |archive = User talk:Neotarf/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| How to disable Media Viewer: | |||
| * At the top of your page when you are logged in: Preferences > Appearance > Files. | |||
| Subpages: | |||
| *] Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the ''Signpost'' during the 2013 arbitration cycle | |||
| *]:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections | |||
| *]: Enables edit counter | |||
| *]:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013 | |||
| *]:Some notes | |||
| *] (including link to discussion about "retired" banner) | |||
| *] Wikimania civility speech, August 2014 | |||
| {{retired}} | |||
| == Arbcom talk comment == | |||
| Hello Neotarf. | |||
| I'm puzzled by . As far as I know, you never addressed me or mentioned me until you posted a proposal at ANI first week of September concerning page bans for me, Eric and Pork]. None of the assembled GGTF participants, in fact nobody at all (other than you) endorsed your proposal. Your narrative in today's comment gives a very different impression. As you may recall, in my case, I voluntarily withdrew from posting at GGTF in September because my efforts were not welcome there. At any rate, I just would like to suggest you check your narrative against whatever diffs you need to check to ensure that it's accurate. As you know, I've previously posted on the Decision Talk page about the importance of Principle 4 and I feel that everyone should be especially careful about fact checking and documentation in this case. Thanks. ]] 15:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Seriously? The narratives have no relation to the truth, much less the diffs. Makes one wonder about Tarf's additions to articles. Probably misrepresenting sources as well.]<span style="font-style:italic"><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 16:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015