Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:32, 13 July 2006 editDrboisclair (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,549 edits {{User|Doright}}← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024 edit undoNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits update to remove reference to RfCs, as user-conduct RfCs were discontinued several years ago 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{historical}}
{{editabuselinks}}<br />
{{Misplaced Pages:Personal attack intervention noticeboard/Header}}


:'''This process has been discontinued per ].'''
== Alerts ==


The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on ] ], was intended as a counterpart to ]. A person with complaints over ] could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page.


Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While ] is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite ]. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and ] on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was ], with the result that the noticeboard was closed on {{#formatdate:10 January 2007}}.


The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the ], ] or, as a last resort, ].


===Procedure===

]
=={{User|Nigelj}}==
]
On July 10, 2006, ] posted on ]. Since I believed that ]'s statement "about which he apparently knows so little" was clearly a person attack on me, I which he . On July 11, 2006, ] made a personal attack on ] in . ] 20:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
]

=={{User|Doright}}==
On July 13, 2006, ] posted on the ] page. He accuses another editor CTSWyneken of charading when CTSWyneken is trying to work for consensus in editing an article, and he accuses CTSWyneken of editing articles at the behest of CTSWyneken's employer. Here is an earlier post that is similar: . Last month he made this comment about Lutheran clergymen to another editor . This was his response to the editor who confronted him: --] 19:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024

This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
This process has been discontinued per this discussion.

The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on 7 October 2005, was intended as a counterpart to the request for intervention against vandalism page. A person with complaints over personal attacks could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page.

Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While vandalism is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite subjective. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and wikilawyering on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was nominated for deletion, with the result that the noticeboard was closed on 10 January 2007.

The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the administrators' noticeboard, dispute resolution or, as a last resort, arbitration.

Procedure

Misplaced Pages:Personal attack intervention noticeboard/Header

Categories: