Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ste4k: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:30, 13 July 2006 editJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits chill!← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:39, 5 July 2011 edit undoMechamind90 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,609 edits Use template only on user page to avoid list duplication. 
(406 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{TOCright}}
#To discuss articles, please use the appropriate Discussion page of that article.
#To contact me ]

== A suggestion from a previously uninvolved admin ==

Hopefully you won't ignore this. May I suggest that you keep your talk page as others have edited it but with your modifications commented out using the <nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki> templates and then when you want to read the page, uncomment out your font and size modifiers and use the preview button. This will hopefully make everyone happy. ] 04:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:Since your an admin and discussing policy (imho), there isn't any reason to ignore your message. About your suggestion, I will take it under consideration. Thanks! :) ] 04:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
== OH, L<sup>\</sup>@^@<sup>\</sup>K! ] has opinions! ==
Ste4k, I know you don't like people posting on your talk page, but I'm a bit worried that you are misunderstanding the role of ] on Misplaced Pages. "Since your an admin .... there isn't any reason to ignore your message," suggests that you '''would''' ignore messages from regular editors. An admin's opinions, advice, and input are not automatically worth more or more correct than any editor's. Keep that in mind. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 19:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:Nscheffy, I don't believe that you can know, have known, or ever will know what I have, do, or will like. Do you actually not see how your statement is offensive? ] 19:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
::Actually I don't, {{RPA}} --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 20:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Do you want to speak about that incident that you know nothing about? Or do you want to address the topic that you brought up? ] 20:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
::::You are completely out of control. Saying I "know nothing" is {{RPA}} --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 21:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::So you would prefer to digress the matter rather than address it. ] 21:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

== Course in Miracles ==
I could not reach you by email but please do not suggest a name change to the "A Course in Miracles" article.] 19:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:I'd seriously like to put the entire subject matter behind me. Until doing serious research on this topic, I hadn't ever heard of it, still haven't ever seen any of it mentioned in the media in any serious way, doubt that it has any real significance to world wide politics, religion, society, charities, wars, or anything else that is going to significantly change the planet any time soon. The fact that it does require an enormous amount of research indicates only that it is an obscure topic. That so many editors have so many different viewpoints on the matter only indicates that nobody can reach consensus and that the subject matter is ambiguous. The article along with its neighbors has caused significant amounts of abusive remarks to me for simply researching the matter which indicates that the presence of the article causes more problems than it serves to provide any information. Providing information is the primary objective of the encyclopedia. Consensus is the primary means that this encyclopedia changes it's content. And disambiguity is the primary tool for accomplishing that goal. ] 19:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


== OH, L<sup>\</sup>@^@<sup>\</sup>K! ] quotes policy! ==
Please see ] concerning what you are doing. You are way out of line here. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 21:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
:could you be more specific? ] 21:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
::Hey, just chill. Let people write what they want and ignore the trolls. You can rely on us to ignore the trolls too. ] 21:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:39, 5 July 2011

Redirect to: