| Revision as of 05:49, 14 July 2006 editHongQiGong (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,196 edits →Ideogram is a Communist bitch← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:13, 13 January 2024 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors43,178 edits Forth (programming language) listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (800 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Notice|<center> |
{{Notice|<center> | ||
| I try to keep conversations threaded. | |||
| '''I generally reply to posts here on this page.''' | |||
| '''Usually if I post on your talk page I watchlist you.''' | |||
| </center>}} | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | '''Welcome!''' | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
| ==Hello and welcome== | ==Hello and welcome== | ||
| Hello Ideogram, Welcome to Misplaced Pages. <br> | Hello Ideogram, Welcome to Misplaced Pages. <br> | ||
| Thank you for the very kind message you left for me. It came as a very pleasant and welcome surprise. I think Misplaced Pages has a lot of potential, although it has its detractors, but I'm glad you've decided to make up your own mind about it and the best way to do that is to get involved. In the long run things usually work out well, and there are lot of very capable and dedicated editors here that ensure the integrity of the project is protected as much as possible. (The abilities of the various monkeys here are diverse but the mix seems to work.) Please let me know if there's anything you ever need help with and I look forward to hearing from you. Once again, welcome! ] 00:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC) | Thank you for the very kind message you left for me. It came as a very pleasant and welcome surprise. I think Misplaced Pages has a lot of potential, although it has its detractors, but I'm glad you've decided to make up your own mind about it and the best way to do that is to get involved. In the long run things usually work out well, and there are lot of very capable and dedicated editors here that ensure the integrity of the project is protected as much as possible. (The abilities of the various monkeys here are diverse but the mix seems to work.) Please let me know if there's anything you ever need help with and I look forward to hearing from you. Once again, welcome! ] 00:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 18: | Line 25: | ||
| == Archives == | == Archives == | ||
| ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| ]. ] 05:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]. ] 23:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]. ] 11:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==] activity== | |||
| Well, in hopes of ending a revert/move war, I listed the poll ] as an official ] poll. This stopped the revert | |||
| war, but attracted many other editors to the article. Now the article is getting over | |||
| 100 edits per day, and its talk page even more. There's not much progress; it's mostly churn. The level of acrimony seems to be below the level that requires administrator attention, but getting anything like convergence looks difficult. One of the interesting phenomena with this article is that it has timezone issues; it's being edited around the clock, and there's almost a daily cycle of point of view adjustments. Any ideas? --] 23:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd say keep discussing it and hope that you can reach a consensus. Misplaced Pages encourages people to participate; the broader the eventual consensus the better. ] 13:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::There's been a blowup over there. See the end of ] and the tail end of ]. Sigh. And for a while it looked like we were making progress. --] 22:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't know how I can help. I'm not an admin and I hesitate to get into a dispute between admins. ] 22:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Good point. Thanks. --] 22:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Conflict== | |||
| Hi Ideogram, I've been away for a couple of days, but looking at the talk page it looks like things have calmed down a bit. To be honest, I would not feel comfortable entering a conflict that I've had no previous part in and taking a stance against another user. I appreciate that you have felt overwhelmed but I don't think my joining in would be particularly helpful. It looks like there's been a shift towards agreement anyway, and that's a very positive thing. ] 12:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you Rossrs. Yes, the conflict appears to have been resolved. ] 12:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm glad to hear that! I sometimes think it would be so much easier to resolve things face to face - this is not exactly an easy medium for communicating. ] 15:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "Editors recommended actions" == | |||
| This really clutters up the AfD page and serves no useful purpose that I can see. Everything below the nomination <u>is</u> the editors' recommended actions. Just my opinion. ] 16:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, I was just using the template from the instructions. ] 16:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Interesting, I haven't seen it before. Must be pretty old. I don't know that I've seen it used before. Most AfD's just have the nominator's comments, and then others chime in, like ] ] 16:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Current events in HK and Macao == | |||
| I've created ] and also updated ]. But it was quite a bit of work because of all the formatting. I don't think there's enough interest to upkeep current events in HK and Macau to as much detail and attention that those pages currently require. I suggest we come up with a simpler format for those pages. I'm going to comment in the Talk page of ]. We can take the discussion over there. ] 16:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Well, it seems that ] has reverted my changes. I commented on his talk page. Please participate in the discussion if you're interested. ] 17:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image:BuddhisticStatuesHK.jpg== | |||
| Hi, you contacted me on my commons-page because of my photo. Thanks that you want to use my photo. Sorry dont know how/where to write you a wikimail. Can you tell me that? Where exactly do u want to credit me? Isnt my commons-name sufficient? Please reply on my commons-page --] 19:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article graphs == | |||
| Cheers man. I think the graph is pretty neat myself - it's nice to see something visually rather than wade through a table of data! And it will be easy to update too - the "Easy Timeline" tool is a bit of a misnomer, but once you look at the source for the page I think anybody could update it. I just added another one in to show the "per million" statistics, which showed up something very interesting: while the proportion of Misplaced Pages articles that are featured is in long term decline (and not even slowing down), the proportion of "good" articles continues to climb quite rapidly. The long term decline of the featured article proportion has been commented on before, but hopefully it's just a sign that the golden standard is being continually raised higher. It's reassuring that the good article proportion (and the good article criteria are about as tough as the featured article ones were until relatively recently) is on the up. ] 23:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, and thanks... good spot! :-) Nice to see somebody else edit that page, and that it's in an easily editable form! ] 00:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, the timeline tool is very cool. I'm going to play with it in some other articles too. ] 00:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::It could do with better documentation perhaps; but cool nonetheless. I've been doing things like sticking timelines into biographies. ] 05:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Where is this timeline tool? And would someone like to apply it to ], which has a timeline garbaged by bad CSS absolute positioning? Thanks. --] 05:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You can read the (sparse) documentation . Two simple examples are on my user page ] and at ]. ] 05:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Prod == | |||
| Howdy - just wanted to make sure you are aware of the Proposed Deletion process available at ]. I noticed some of the articles you sent to AfD are pretty much non-controversial and likely could be deleted using this process. You just place the tag on the page and it is automatically deleted after a few days if no one contests it. Easier than AfD! --<font color="3300FF">] (])</font> 18:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, thanks. --] 18:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages conventions == | |||
| Wondered if you had seen the questions I posted at the bottom of ] - not sure if you still had it on your watchlist, or were just busy... ] 19:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I try to prune my watchlist, so if you want my attention you should post here. --] 19:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Great! 'Nother question: what is the difference between References and External Links - subhead Articles (this convention is used in ])? I have added one article in the latter section of ] - do I have the format right? TIA ] 14:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::References would be any background reading material helpful for understanding the article. External links would be anything else that is on a web page. Your format looks fine. --] 15:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Strictly speaking, "References" should be material that was actually used as a reference in constructing the article. Some editors include a "Further reading" section for other useful reading material. Guidance on "External links" can be found ]. --] <small>(])</small> 17:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thanks, guys!] 19:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Another handy resource I forgot to mention before: ] discusses the standard section headings (references, further reading etc.), what should appear in them, and what order they should be in. --] <small>(])</small> 19:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks!!! though I doubt that anything drastic will happen. This has been very low key. :) Cheers!]] 08:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for the edit == | |||
| I appreciate your obfuscation of my email address. ] 18:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| ====Regarding reversions made on ] ] (]) to ]==== | |||
| {| class="user-block" | |||
| || ] | |||
| || You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
| |}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] 07:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| : YOu're right - 4R was outside 24h. I've unblocked you ] 08:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sorry to bother you, but my ip address is still blocked. BTW I've learned my lesson; I won't cut it so close again. --] 08:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Is it unblocked now? ] 09:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Top-importance computer science articles == | |||
| == NPR Mediation == | |||
| Hi Ideogram, | |||
| I trust you've seen . In light of his efforts to intimidate you away from the NPR discussion, I think his history is ironic. He removed that part of his resume from the , but it's there in the history for those who wish to find out about the qualifications of that particular "mediator."--] 10:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through ] and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as ]) are really as important as ] or the ubiquitous ], as opposed to simply of ] (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —'']'' 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah I was aware of that. It's hard to intimidate someone over the Internet. I'm watching him very closely. --] 10:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :OK ] (]) 20:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Recent POV pushing by anons and socks on Taiwan/ROC related articles == | |||
| == Birthright Israel == | |||
| The recent POV pushing by several anon (and in some cases, registered users) on Taiwan/ROC related articles seem to be the work of at least one individual using multiple sockpupppets (all edits from the 167.7.39.* IP block). I am also beginning to suspect that {{user|24.88.124.252}} may also be a sock of {{user|Devout Christian}} based on some editing and edit summary similarities, though I am not sure if these are all the work of a single individual. Given the persistant reversions by anon IPs and their seeming disinterest in engaging in dialouge I am beginning to lean towards semiprotection of the affected articles. Any ideas? -] 04:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Another revert warrior? == | |||
| I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. ] (]) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I see that you are engaged in nasty revert warring on ]. In case that you have not understood that WP is not a Turkish propaganda machine, please review the guidelines and take care. If you continue to revert mindlessly and spread ] abroad, I'll have to report you. Revert warring is not acceptable and will get you blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 07:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 00:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ''']''' (]) 22:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == List of libraries in Taipei listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of libraries in Taipei'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 12:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Ideogram is a Communist bitch == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| go to hell and file the RFC against yourself. {{unsigned|Chiang Kai-shek}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Ideogram, what did you do to hurt this guy's feelings? ] 05:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:13, 13 January 2024
 | I try to keep conversations threaded. I generally reply to posts here on this page. Usually if I post on your talk page I watchlist you. |
Welcome!
Hello, Ideogram, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Allan McInnes (talk) 22:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello and welcome
Hello Ideogram, Welcome to Misplaced Pages.
Thank you for the very kind message you left for me. It came as a very pleasant and welcome surprise. I think Misplaced Pages has a lot of potential, although it has its detractors, but I'm glad you've decided to make up your own mind about it and the best way to do that is to get involved. In the long run things usually work out well, and there are lot of very capable and dedicated editors here that ensure the integrity of the project is protected as much as possible. (The abilities of the various monkeys here are diverse but the mix seems to work.) Please let me know if there's anything you ever need help with and I look forward to hearing from you. Once again, welcome! Rossrs 00:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Archives
to 17 Jun 2006 | to 21 Jun 2006 | to 26 Jun 2006 | to 07 Sep 2006 | to 17 Nov 2006 | to 07 Feb 2007 | to 08 Mar 2007 | to 23 Apr 2007 | to 10 Jun 2007 | to 8 Aug 2007 | to 16 Jul 2011
Top-importance computer science articles
Hi Ideogram,
You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through Category:Top-importance Computer science articles and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as Compile time) are really as important as Alan Turing or the ubiquitous quicksort, as opposed to simply of high importance (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —Ruud 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Birthright Israel
Hello,
I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. Yaakov Birthright Franklin (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments
Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:People's Republic of China
Portal:People's Republic of China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:People's Republic of China and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:People's Republic of China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 22:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
List of libraries in Taipei listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of libraries in Taipei. Since you had some involvement with the List of libraries in Taipei redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:People's Republic of China
Portal:People's Republic of China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:People's Republic of China (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:People's Republic of China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Huangjinghai (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Forth (programming language)
Forth (programming language) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)