User talk:Matt 20123: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:39, 18 December 2014 editAreaseven (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers79,433 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Spectre (2015 film). (TW)← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 21:08, 21 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(91 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 21:		Line 21:
	\| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">		\| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
	Hi '''Matt 20123'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (])		Hi '''Matt 20123'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (])
	<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small~~><span style="text-align:right;"~~>This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, ] (]) 20:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)</small~~></span~~>		<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small>This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, ] (]) 20:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)</small>
	</div>		</div>
	\|}		\|}
Line 27:		Line 27:
	<!--Template:IAV!-->		<!--Template:IAV!-->

	== ~~December~~ ~~2014~~ ==		== Your block! ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

			Hi Matt. I've increased your block to indefinite given that you've again deleted the blocking notice from your talk page without acknowledging the issue. I fear you would continue your disruption on getting unblocked. Therefore, I'm letting this block remain indefinitely until you let me know here that you understand the issue and would not be editing disruptively again. Thanks. ] ] 03:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
	'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 12:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


			{{unblock reviewed \| 1= I was engaged in an "Edit war". \| decline = This is not an adequate summary of the problems that led to your block. If you do not understand why you were blocked, the problematic behaviour will likely recur. Thus I cannot unblock you. ] (]) 00:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)}}

			== Your unblock request ==

			Matt, when your unblock request gets rejected by an administrator, you are supposed to post a ''fresh'' unblock request rather than attempting to change the wordings of a declined unblock request, as you did . At the same time, I have seen that after I increased your block to indefinite, you've posted a of the issue on your talk page (and unfortunately deleted the same in consecutive edits). I see the effort you've taken and am assuming ] that you will not repeat your edit warring behaviour again. I'm therefore reducing the block and allowing you to edit again. My strong suggestion would be to read up on the following pages ''before'' you resume editing:

			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			If you require clarifications at any time, feel free to write to me on my talk page. Take care and do not edit war again. ] ] 19:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

			Ok I won't do it again ] ] 13:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
			::And yet you continue to remove the dmy date template and add multiple redundant film date templates. ]? ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 12:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

			It's because it's the other way around ] ] 14:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

			:But they're not. American films have the mdy date format. Why have you done and edit since being warned not to? ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 08:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

			:And why for a British film? - ] (]) 13:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

			Oh sorry about that ] ] 19:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

			:] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. ] have the ability to ] users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> Why on earth are you still acting disruptively, while pretending to apologise on your talk page. You are heading to ANI as a disruptive editor unless you change your editing patterns bloody quickly. ] (]) 17:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

			Sorry I was just proving a point ] ] 17:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

			:Don't. ]y edits are disruptive and '''will''' end up in someone reporting your behaviour. - ] (]) 17:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

			Ok but just show me a little respect ] ] 22:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

			== Copyright ==

			It is inappropriate to add links to free in the External links section and it is even more inappropriate to add them as the official website. Don't do that. -- ] (]) 19:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

			==January 2015 pt II==
			Please stop removing maintenance tags as you have been doing at several articles including . They are there for several reasons and they help to gather info at other spots here at Misplaced Pages. Further edits of this sort can result in your being blocked again. Your cooperation in this will be appreciated. ]\|] 19:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

			:{{U\|MarnetteD}} - this user keeps doing this! So close to being blocked for good. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 15:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

			] Please stop continuing to remove ] from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered ]. Further edits of this type may result in your account being ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-tdel3 --> ]\|] 16:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

			] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> ]\|] 16:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

			== Your unblock request II ==

			{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''''Yesterday I edited the film ] and I its template, that's what made HJ Mitchell block me. ~~~~''}} ] ] 12:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
			:Matt, it looks like you're trying to make an unblock request, but the template is formatted incorrectly so this might not attract the attention of any admins. If you want to make the request, try using wikicode like this: <tt><nowiki>{{unblock\|reason=Yesterday I edited the film ] and I removed its template, that's what made HJ Mitchell block me. ~~~~}}</nowiki></tt>
			:'''BUT FIRST''' – you'll need to work on your unblock request before it has any chance of succeeding. You weren't blocked for making one particular edit, but for making many unhelpful edits of a similar type over a long period of time, even after several people asked you not too. You'd need to convince an admin that (1) you understand why your edits were inappropriate, (2) that you won't make similar edits in the future, and (3) that you'll be able to make helpful edits so it's actually worth unblocking you. ]<sup>(]•])</sup> 12:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1= here's why i've been blocked

			I removed the film templates

			I edited film stubs

			I did British film dates the other way round (df=y). ] ] 11:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)\|decline=Before unblocking you, I need a better explanation of what went wrong. You've identified some of the problems, however, why did you do these things? If unblocked, how will your editing be different? ] (]) 19:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=I was blocked because I edited the film ]. ] ] 22:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC) \| decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
			*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <u>or</u>
			*the block is no longer necessary because you
			:#understand what you have been blocked for,
			:#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
			:#will make useful contributions instead.

			Please read the ] for more information. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 23:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)}}

			* You can make a new unblock request, but you shouldn't revert the decline of a previous request. ] (]) 19:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=here's why i've been blocked I removed the film templates on the (]) page I edited film stubs on the (]) page And I did British film dates the other way round on the (]) page. ] ] 22:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC) \| decline = You still have failed to convince me that you will not repeat the same behaviour that got you blocked, nor that you fully understand why you were blocked in the first place. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 15:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock request reviewed\| 1= I've been blocked because I did to much removing of this and that. ] ] 15:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)\|decline=Unresponsive. This is now your final chance. Please make one more effort to show us you will behave differently in the future. If you can't answer that, your next request may be declined and your talk page may be disabled. ] (]) 15:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1= I will not edit too much again. ] ] 18:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)\|decline=That's an inadequate explanation of what went wrong. ] (]) 19:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC)}}

			<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">
			] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.'''
			<span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ] • ] • • }} • ] • • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()) </span>
			{{clear}}
			----
			If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the ]'s '']''.<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->

Latest revision as of 21:08, 21 March 2022

Welcome...

Hello, Matt 20123, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Adrian J. Hunter 11:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Matt 20123, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Matt 20123! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your block!

Hi Matt. I've increased your block to indefinite given that you've again deleted the blocking notice from your talk page without acknowledging the issue. I fear you would continue your disruption on getting unblocked. Therefore, I'm letting this block remain indefinitely until you let me know here that you understand the issue and would not be editing disruptively again. Thanks. Wifione 03:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matt 20123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was engaged in an "Edit war".

Decline reason:

This is not an adequate summary of the problems that led to your block. If you do not understand why you were blocked, the problematic behaviour will likely recur. Thus I cannot unblock you. Huon (talk) 00:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unblock request

Matt, when your unblock request gets rejected by an administrator, you are supposed to post a fresh unblock request rather than attempting to change the wordings of a declined unblock request, as you did here. At the same time, I have seen that after I increased your block to indefinite, you've posted a cumulative acknowledgement of the issue on your talk page (and unfortunately deleted the same in consecutive edits). I see the effort you've taken and am assuming good faith that you will not repeat your edit warring behaviour again. I'm therefore reducing the block and allowing you to edit again. My strong suggestion would be to read up on the following pages before you resume editing:

If you require clarifications at any time, feel free to write to me on my talk page. Take care and do not edit war again. Wifione 19:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok I won't do it again Matt 20123 13:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

And yet you continue to remove the dmy date template and add multiple redundant film date templates. Why are you doing this? Lugnuts 12:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

It's because it's the other way around Matt 20123 14:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

But they're not. American films have the mdy date format. Why have you done this and this edit since being warned not to? Lugnuts 08:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

And why this for a British film? - SchroCat (talk) 13:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh sorry about that Matt 20123 19:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Ex Machina (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Why on earth are you still acting disruptively, while pretending to apologise on your talk page. You are heading to ANI as a disruptive editor unless you change your editing patterns bloody quickly. SchroCat (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I was just proving a point Matt 20123 17:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Don't. WP:Pointy edits are disruptive and will end up in someone reporting your behaviour. - SchroCat (talk) 17:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok but just show me a little respect Matt 20123 22:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright

It is inappropriate to add links to free streaming services in the External links section and it is even more inappropriate to add them as the official website. Don't do that. -- 109.76.166.183 (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015 pt II

Please stop removing maintenance tags as you have been doing at several articles including this one. They are there for several reasons and they help to gather info at other spots here at Misplaced Pages. Further edits of this sort can result in your being blocked again. Your cooperation in this will be appreciated. MarnetteD|Talk 19:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

MarnetteD - this user keeps doing this! So close to being blocked for good. Lugnuts 15:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to The American President, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 16:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ...And Justice for All (film). MarnetteD|Talk 16:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your unblock request II

{{unblock|reason=''Yesterday I edited the film Gossip and I its template, that's what made HJ Mitchell block me. ~~~~}} Matt 20123 12:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Matt, it looks like you're trying to make an unblock request, but the template is formatted incorrectly so this might not attract the attention of any admins. If you want to make the request, try using wikicode like this: {{unblock|reason=Yesterday I edited the film ] and I removed its template, that's what made HJ Mitchell block me. ~~~~}}

BUT FIRST – you'll need to work on your unblock request before it has any chance of succeeding. You weren't blocked for making one particular edit, but for making many unhelpful edits of a similar type over a long period of time, even after several people asked you not too. You'd need to convince an admin that (1) you understand why your edits were inappropriate, (2) that you won't make similar edits in the future, and (3) that you'll be able to make helpful edits so it's actually worth unblocking you. Adrian J. Hunter 12:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Matt 20123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

here's why i've been blocked

I removed the film templates

I edited film stubs

I did British film dates the other way round (df=y). Matt 20123 11:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Before unblocking you, I need a better explanation of what went wrong. You've identified some of the problems, however, why did you do these things? If unblocked, how will your editing be different? PhilKnight (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Matt 20123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I edited the film Gossip. Matt 20123 22:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

You can make a new unblock request, but you shouldn't revert the decline of a previous request. PhilKnight (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Matt 20123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

here's why i've been blocked I removed the film templates on the (Gossip) page I edited film stubs on the (Kill Me Three Times) page And I did British film dates the other way round on the (Ex Machina) page. Matt 20123 22:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You still have failed to convince me that you will not repeat the same behaviour that got you blocked, nor that you fully understand why you were blocked in the first place. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Matt 20123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked because I did to much removing of this and that. Matt 20123 15:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unresponsive. This is now your final chance. Please make one more effort to show us you will behave differently in the future. If you can't answer that, your next request may be declined and your talk page may be disabled. EdJohnston (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Matt 20123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not edit too much again. Matt 20123 18:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's an inadequate explanation of what went wrong. PhilKnight (talk) 19:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.