| Revision as of 03:44, 20 December 2014 editLevelledout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,042 edits Formatting change← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:16, 13 December 2022 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Levelledout/Archive 5) (botTag: Manual revert |
| (193 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| algo = old(14d) |
|
| algo = old(14d) |
|
| archive = User talk:Levelledout/Archive %(counter)d |
|
| archive = User talk:Levelledout/Archive %(counter)d |
|
| counter = 1 |
|
| counter = 5 |
|
| maxarchivesize = 20K |
|
| maxarchivesize = 20K |
|
| archiveheader = {{talk:Levelledout Archive}} |
|
| archiveheader = {{talk:Levelledout Archive}} |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|}} |
|
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|}} |
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
|
|
|
==Sections== |
|
|
Can you please alter the sections to reflect what BR and I agreed to. Put Usage first and we can work out the language next. ] 19:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:I've read through the discussion ] and it definitely would seem to me that whilst you were proposing '''Usage (statistics)''' to go at the top, ] was proposing that '''Uses (Medical indications etc)''' should go at the top of the article. I'm not sure whether the two of you realised at any point that you were both referring to entirely different sections. However I note that there was eventually some agreement that a section called '''Usage''' should go at the top. I will change the edit request but am going to make clear that this issue of Usage/Uses still needs to be sorted out.] (]) 20:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{u|AlbinoFerret}} I did not clear the difference in explanation on "uses" with Albinoferret but in my opinion, any interpretation of "uses" would be a good first section. I favor starting the article with an explanation of why the product is used, how it works, then physically what it is. These could be "uses" and "construction" sections. ]] 20:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:::{{ping|User:Bluerasberry}} I dont have a problem with a simple section called Uses that basically follows the first paragraph in the lede without all the "aerosol" definitions being first. I think we can come to an agreement on the wording relatively quickly. If we need wording for now just use the first paragraph in the lede and we can modify it later. ] 20:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
