| Revision as of 04:04, 16 July 2006 editNeoChaosX (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,250 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024 edit undoNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits update to remove reference to RfCs, as user-conduct RfCs were discontinued several years ago | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{historical}} | |||
| {{editabuselinks}}<br /> | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :'''This process has been discontinued per ].''' | |||
| == Alerts == | |||
| == Asmodeus == | |||
| Adding this alert due to ]'s behaviour on the AfD for the article "Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe" - ]. In it, he has accused Byrgenwulf of being a liar, stupid, and motivated by a political agenda ("Byrgenwulf needs to tell the truth for a change - he attacked the article, and proposed this vote, because he's an anti-ID fanatic who baselessly disputes the content and quality of the CTMU, a theory which he doesn't even begin to understand."), myself (Tevildo) of being ignorant of philosophy ("you couldn't even begin to coherently justify either of these assertions") and Keglind of being sexually inadequate ("Hey, Keglined - why don't you go and brush up your jealous edits regarding the penis sizes of porn stars Peter North and John "Johnny Wadd" Holmes?"). I would also refer to his attack on my intellectual capacity on his talk page ]. <nowiki>{{Npa-2n}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{Npa-3}}</nowiki> have been added to his talk page, although his attacks have continued since their addition. I also suspect that he may be one of several sockpuppets, but this may not be relevant to this notification. ] 20:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I've warned the user. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on ] ], was intended as a counterpart to ]. A person with complaints over ] could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page. | |||
| =={{User|Michaelch7}}== | |||
| Repeated personal attacks on myself, in regards to articles related to California State University. Has accused me of vandalizing and pushing an agenda on my talk page , and has continued to level these accusations at me in other article discussions about CSU ( ) and in discussing the deletion of ] ( .) I placed an Npa-2 template on his talk page, and he responded by copying the exact same template on my User page. ] 04:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While ] is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite ]. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and ] on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was ], with the result that the noticeboard was closed on {{#formatdate:10 January 2007}}. | |||
| The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the ], ] or, as a last resort, ]. | |||
| ===Procedure=== | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
- This process has been discontinued per this discussion.
The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on 7 October 2005, was intended as a counterpart to the request for intervention against vandalism page. A person with complaints over personal attacks could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page.
Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While vandalism is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite subjective. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and wikilawyering on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was nominated for deletion, with the result that the noticeboard was closed on 10 January 2007.
The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the administrators' noticeboard, dispute resolution or, as a last resort, arbitration.
Procedure
Misplaced Pages:Personal attack intervention noticeboard/Header
Categories: