Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:09, 5 January 2015 view sourceDocumentError (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,388 edits User:Legacypac← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:31, 26 December 2024 view source Pppery (talk | contribs)Interface administrators, Administrators100,049 edits User:Plasticwonder: Done 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}}
<noinclude>{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{Requests for permissions|state=uncollapsed}}{{noadminbacklog}}<!--If the backlog is cleared, change this to {{noadminbacklog}} and vice-versa.--></noinclude>
{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude>
==={{anchor|rperm-rollback}}Rollback===

:;(<span class="plainlinks"> &#8226; ]</span>)
===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback===
<noinclude>{{Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback}}
{{TOCright}}{{Shortcuts|WP:PERM/R|WP:RFP/R|WP:PERMS/R}}</noinclude> {{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=R|subpage=Rollback|notice=<noinclude>
Please review ''']''' before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:
# At least {{Misplaced Pages:Rollback/Mainspace count}} ] edits.
# At least a month of experience patrolling ].
# No recent history of ].
# A track record of consistently ] editors when reverting their edits.
The ] is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.
</noinclude>}}
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.-->
====]====
* {{rfplinks|1=DocumentError}}
:I have more than 3500 edits and an unblemished edit history over several years. Recently I have dealt with a number of instances of promotional vandalism and it would be helpful to have rollback for those cases. I understand how Rollback works. ]]] 00:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
::{{done}}. ] (]) 01:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
====]====
* {{rfplinks|1=Makro}}
:I would like to expand my experience on Misplaced Pages and help keep it free from vandalism and copyright infringement ] (]) 14:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====
* {{Rfplinks|1=Acj1}} *{{rfplinks|1=PersonAccount}}
I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Misplaced Pages and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. ] (]) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
:I would like to help stop vandalism to Misplaced Pages! ] =^.^= ] 23:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC) 19:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

::{{not done}}. Please see the notice at the top of this page.&nbsp;With only 10 edits to mainspace,&nbsp;I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at ] and when you have made 200 or so edits to articles you may wish to enroll at the ] to learn more. &mdash; '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 23:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
:{{u|PersonAccount}}, to be honest, no, it doesn't appear you are a new user. Which is okay if all previous activity was without having an account and without disruption. It will take longer than for other users until the trust for manually granting permissions is there in your case. It isn't yet, to me. Unless someone else grants rollback in the next week or so, I'll decline this with a recommendation not to ask for permissions until your account is a year old. Regarding rollback in particular, Twinkle and Ultraviolet will do just fine. ] (]) 02:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|MusikAnimal}} This will be my 367 edit. ] =^.^= ] 23:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
:{{not done}} ] (]) 08:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Acj1}} We generally expect 200 edits to the '']'', or a sufficient recent editing history clearly showing you can identify what constitutes vandalism and ] edits. See ] to learn more. Thank you for your interest in helping fight vandalism. &mdash; '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 00:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

:::::Can I come back when I've made enough edits??? {{ping|MusikAnimal}} Thanks, ] =^.^= ] 00:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
====]====
::::::Certainly! Just file a new request at a later time, to help demonstrate your growth, include a link to this discussion: ]. — ] <sup>]</sup> 02:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
*{{rfplinks|1=NXcrypto}}
:::::::Thanks!!! ]|]|] 21:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Cmrc23}}
Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. ] 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

:I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training ] and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). ] 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Grumpylawnchair}}
I would like rollback to help me combat vandalism more effectively. I currently use recent changes and RedWarn. I feel that I have the experience necessary to handle vandalism in a constructive manner. <span style="background-color:black; color:white; padding: 1.5px;] (])</span> 04:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}} ] (]) 08:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Randomdude121}}
Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using ] and ] to revert any vandalism seen on ]. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).

Having the rollback permission would make ] reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like ]. Could I have the right please? ] (]) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Plasticwonder}}
I view that having this user right would help in fighting vandalism a lot faster. I know I would be far more efficient with fighting vandalism if I were to be granted Rollback. I have been editing for over 7 months, and I have well over 5140 edits, with a focus on mitigating abuse on the wiki. I am a frequent contributor to AIV and RPP. ] (]) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
: {{Done}} ] ] 00:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Obversa}}
I am requesting rollback rights to revert an edit by another user that merged ] with ], without prior authorization or agreement, on 15 November 2024 - a higher-up editor or administrator previously denied a merge request due to "no consensus" in January 2024 - or allowing other users to discuss or dispute the page merge, as indicated for the procedure on ]. I have been trying to recover the ] page that was merged into ] without success, and need administrator assistance or intervention in order to revert or roll back the merge. ] (]) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
: {{not done}} You don't need rollback to revert one specific edit - see ]. ] ] 00:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Malhar1234}}
Hello I'm a very sincere and careful Wikipedian, I mainly works on the fields of "stop vandalism", "find valuable resources for articles" and create ne articles.


So, if I'll can access the rollback tool, then I working on YouTube more flowlessly and without any hardness.
====]====
* {{rfplinks|1=Tomandjerry211}}
:I want to help revert vandalism on Misplaced Pages.] (]) 23:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
::{{admin note}} This users request for ] was declined twice in December () &mdash; '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 16:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)


-Thanking You! ] (]) 09:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
====]====
: {{not done}} I see no recent anti-vandalism actions in your contributions. And this is Misplaced Pages, not YouTube. ] ] 00:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{rfplinks|1=Legacypac}}
:Dealing with increasing numbers of POV vandals, especially on terrorism related articles. My reports have resulted in quite a few bans recently, looking for ways to speed up damage cleanup. ] (]) 05:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
::{{not done}} You seem to have had issues with edit warring in the recent past. Furthermore, looking at the edits you have undone over the past month, I see very few where rollback would be applicable. Reverting banned users is ], but mind you can use ] to accomplish the same task. This decline is nothing personal, I just don't think you'll have much use for it given the controversial subjects you work, where many of the reverts would seemingly be expected to have an informative edit summary. Thanks for your understanding. &mdash; '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 16:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
:::I have no issues with edit warring other then to deal with edit warriors. I recently stated using Twinkle, and without access to this tool it is hard to tell the difference. It almost sounds like this tool works like Twinkle and there is no real difference?<br/>As far as offense, I am tempted to take offense at being denied the tool only because when I came here I noticed DocumentError was quickly granted the tool. That's not why I came here - just happened his request was on the page. If I am not qualified to do rollbacks then I strongly object to him being given this tool because of his frequent and against me and general incompetince as an editor who can't see past his nationalist views and refuses to accurately read and reflect sources. While I generally ignore his crap I feel strongly he should not even be allowed to edit here at all, and certainly not with any extra rights. ] (]) 20:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
::::I can't speak for DocumentError, I did not respond to that request. If another admin wants to reverse my decision to decline yours, that is fine, but I stand by it. Personal attacks and rollback don't necessarily have a relevant correlation. When you have had issues with ''edit warring'' as soon as a month ago, that is a red flag by any standards. Correct, system rollback offers nothing more than Twinkle does. However the rollback user right allows you access to semi-automated tools such as Huggle and STiki. Misuse of Twinkle features could result in the same consequences as rollback misuse, but I'm not suggesting that will be the case with you. In fact, having a record showing what you've rollbacked with Twinkle using the three options ("vandal", normal rollback, and "good faith") is a good way to exemplify your judgement on when system rollback would be appropriate. &mdash; '''] <sup>]</sup>''' 21:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::Ok cool. I've launched multiple edit warring complaints, and sanctions have resulted on the other users, but never been found to be edit warring. The complaints are just another way of dealing with disruptive users since I don't have admin tools. I don't believe my use of 3RR reports should be held against me. If Twinkle does the same job, I'll keep using it for now. It's pretty slick - used it to do a big long term vandalism rollback yesterday actually that would have taken forever the hard way. ] (]) 22:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
::::::Legacypac - you have been cautioned more times than it is possible to count about spreading claims of other editors "personally attacking" you, as you just did here in reference to me. You have also been repeatedly informed it is par-for-the-course to ping another editor when you discuss them (what you did not do when you just leveled this accusation against me). As ] noted, Rollback Requests is not the place for complaining about other editors. ]]] 23:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====
* {{rfplinks|1=Rationalobserver}} *{{rfplinks|1=Gnu779}}
: I would like this user right so as to empower me to better defend the project against vandalism. I promise I will never use RB in a content dispute, or in any other inappropriate way. Thanks! ] (]) 21:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC) I request rollback rights because I hate vandals and I want to get rid of them. {{smiley}} ] (]) 12:42, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has <!-- mb-mainSpaceCount -->30<!-- mb-mainSpaceCount-end --> edits in the ]. <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 12:50, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
: {{not done}} I don't think you're experienced enough for this yet. ] ] 00:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Fishy-Finns}}
Hi, I would like rollback so I can more efficiently fight obvious vandalism and I will use it responsibly and will always assume good faith. I have over 200 edits, but a few days under a month of reverting experience on recent changes, but please let that slide because it includes around 50 good quality reverts with pretty consistent and accurate warnings on talk pages. I only revert very obvious vandalism currently, and that's what I will do if granted with rollback, so I doubt I would suddenly decide to abuse my power if granted. Thanks for the consideration ] (]) 18:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:31, 26 December 2024

Place to request rollback rights
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:
  1. At least 200 mainspace edits.
  2. At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
  3. No recent history of edit warring.
  4. A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits.
The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:PersonAccount

I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Misplaced Pages and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

PersonAccount, to be honest, no, it doesn't appear you are a new user. Which is okay if all previous activity was without having an account and without disruption. It will take longer than for other users until the trust for manually granting permissions is there in your case. It isn't yet, to me. Unless someone else grants rollback in the next week or so, I'll decline this with a recommendation not to ask for permissions until your account is a year old. Regarding rollback in particular, Twinkle and Ultraviolet will do just fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

User:NXcrypto

I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Cmrc23

Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training on this page and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Grumpylawnchair

I would like rollback to help me combat vandalism more effectively. I currently use recent changes and RedWarn. I feel that I have the experience necessary to handle vandalism in a constructive manner. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Randomdude121

Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn to revert any vandalism seen on Special:RecentChanges. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).

Having the rollback permission would make RedWarn reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like Huggle. Could I have the right please? randomdude121 (leave a message!) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Plasticwonder

I view that having this user right would help in fighting vandalism a lot faster. I know I would be far more efficient with fighting vandalism if I were to be granted Rollback. I have been editing for over 7 months, and I have well over 5140 edits, with a focus on mitigating abuse on the wiki. I am a frequent contributor to AIV and RPP. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Obversa

I am requesting rollback rights to revert an edit by another user that merged Baroque Pinto with Friesian Sporthorse, without prior authorization or agreement, on 15 November 2024 - a higher-up editor or administrator previously denied a merge request due to "no consensus" in January 2024 - or allowing other users to discuss or dispute the page merge, as indicated for the procedure on Misplaced Pages: Merging. I have been trying to recover the Baroque Pinto page that was merged into Friesian Sporthorse without success, and need administrator assistance or intervention in order to revert or roll back the merge. Obversa (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You don't need rollback to revert one specific edit - see Help:Reverting. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Malhar1234

Hello I'm a very sincere and careful Wikipedian, I mainly works on the fields of "stop vandalism", "find valuable resources for articles" and create ne articles.

 So, if I'll can access the rollback tool, then I working on YouTube more flowlessly and without any hardness.
                    -Thanking You! Malhar1234 (talk) 09:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I see no recent anti-vandalism actions in your contributions. And this is Misplaced Pages, not YouTube. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Gnu779

I request rollback rights because I hate vandals and I want to get rid of them. Gnu779 (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 30 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 12:50, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I don't think you're experienced enough for this yet. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Fishy-Finns

Hi, I would like rollback so I can more efficiently fight obvious vandalism and I will use it responsibly and will always assume good faith. I have over 200 edits, but a few days under a month of reverting experience on recent changes, but please let that slide because it includes around 50 good quality reverts with pretty consistent and accurate warnings on talk pages. I only revert very obvious vandalism currently, and that's what I will do if granted with rollback, so I doubt I would suddenly decide to abuse my power if granted. Thanks for the consideration Fishy-Finns (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Category: