| Revision as of 15:55, 16 July 2006 view sourceNetscott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,834 edits rv - most certainly trolling← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:43, 28 December 2024 view source Z1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,422 edits Wings (1927 film) listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Archives|bot=MiszaBot III|age=30|archivelist=User talk:Zoe/Archives}} | |||
| {{message}} | |||
| <!--<sub>Subscript text</sub>{{message}}--> | |||
| ] | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="270px" | {| class="infobox" width="270px" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| !align="center"|]<br>] | !align="center"|]<br>] | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
| == Please don't leave == | |||
| Please don't leave, Zoe. I'm very saddened by what happened in the last few days, but it ''can'' blow over. We've never edited the same articles, and would probably disagree on a lot, but I've always seen you as someone who cared a lot about Misplaced Pages and who was good for the project. I am quite sure that Jimbo would not want his hasty words to lead to any permanent hurt, and it's quite obvious from looking at his contributions that he was preoccupied with real life matters for a few days after his phonecall with Mr Pierce, which would explain why no notification of that phonecall was given to the community. It's also clear that his post on ] was written hastily, as he had been away from Misplaced Pages for a few days before, and didn't post anything immediately after, so it's very likely that he forced himself to find time to make a post in order to close the matter immediately, but didn't take the time word it in such a way as to take into account that you were trying to protect Misplaced Pages and that you didn't know it had been resolved. His own on his talk page two days later indicate that he did not have any wish to hurt you. Please, Zoe, don't let this lead to a permanent break with Misplaced Pages. You are highly valued here. ]] 17:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Desysopped == | |||
| In case you return, someone just used your account (among others) saying it had been hacked. It's been emergency desysopped. —] (]) 15:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :In case you just randomly read this page: I miss you. - ] 23:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :From that old discussion, I don't see why anyone had to make such a big fuss about it. Thankfully, they're both in better places now. ] (]) 21:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Otto Fruhner== | |||
| Zoe, | |||
| You once deleted ] because a vandal had posted nonsense. As a matter of politesse, I am informing you that I am re-establishing it as a legitimate biographical article of a World War I flyer. | |||
| ] (]) 09:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == NowCommons: File:H59543.png == | |||
| ] is now available on ] as ]. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: <nowiki>]</nowiki>. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --] (]) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ncnotifier --> | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Devoucoux== | |||
| ---- | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ] (]) 21:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism????? == | |||
| I linked it to Sare in the Basque contrie and horse tackel. The AfD result was a ' '''Keep''' ' result.] (]) 09:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I have eddited no pages. I dont know what you are talking about I'm sorry | |||
| == I am the copy write holder == | |||
| For your information I am the copywrite holder for CHOSA. But I will leave the artical as minimal as possible. | |||
| == JP cartoon "victims" == | |||
| Since you've warned to block me indefinitely should I recreate the page in any fashion, I'd like to ask you, whether you'd agree if I'd follow ] and use his title for my page. If you wish, I'll blank out the names of the admins as well. Can you live with that? ] 00:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please let me explain, why I feel the need to make this list: This list would point out the results, when administrators enforce Februarys poll results by blocking editors who ignore those polls. I don't like those consequences, and they are actually in conflict with ] | |||
| :: ''In order to reach the best possible decisions, we hold it important to listen carefully to each other's arguments, and to try to find mutually acceptable solutions in conflicts. Polls are the exception and not the rule, and where they do exist they are not binding.'' | |||
| : and ] | |||
| :: ''Precise numbers for "supermajority" are hard to establish, and Misplaced Pages is not a majoritarian democracy, so simple vote-counting should never be the key part of the interpretation of a debate. When supermajority voting is used, it should be seen as a process of 'testing' for consensus, rather than reaching consensus. The stated outcome is the best judgment of the facilitator, often an admin. If there is strong disagreement with the outcome from the Misplaced Pages community, it is clear that consensus has not been reached.'' | |||
| :Do you have any suggestion for an inoffensive title for the list? ] 02:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::May I regard your silence as consent? How about the title "Consequences of enforcing Februarys poll results"? ] 12:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == usernameblock == | |||
| Hi Zoe, how do I report a possible <nowiki>{{usernameblock}</nowiki> candidate? It's ] (former Chilean president). He has been editing ], engaged on vandalism and personal attacks agaist another user who warned him. Regards, ]] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ricardo Lagos has been repeatedly vandalizing, and when I reverted his massive vandalism, he tried to add it to BJAODN. If he's up to it again, it's time for him to be blocked. ]|] 01:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. An admin blocked him for now. I found him funnily disturbing. There are some weird people out there...]] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == My RfA == | |||
| Thank you for the trust that you had in me when you supported my ]. The nomination ended successfully and I am actually overwhelmed by the support that I received. Thanks again! -- ] <sup>]</sup> 07:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 3 rv rule redirect. == | |||
| Sorry. I just thought it would be easier to go to this page that way. If it is causing problems or i have done something wrong, please delete it. I was just trying to find the three revert rule page as a person has been vandalising the autism and aspergers pages, amongst others. Actually can you do anything about them. They are from IP ] ] 20:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I will try WP:3RR in future. Thanks for the shortcut. I must remember that when creating redirects, not to do them to pages with Misplaced Pages at the start or other such pages. ] 21:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your proposed deletion of my first entry to Misplaced Pages :The res3ia Enigma== | |||
| Hi there | |||
| Could you enlighten me as to what exactly is wrong with my entry. Having used Misplaced Pages for some time, I thought I would make a contribution of my own, only to discover that you had recommended it for deletion within moments. | |||
| science_watch | |||
| == Your article ] == | |||
| Hi, I have recieved an email from a reader about the article ]. He noticed that article looks a lot like . Even more when your compare it with the the first version of the Misplaced Pages version. According that website the text of ] comes from the "The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia". You seem to be creator of that article. Do you know how this can be? Greetings, --] 22:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I've never heard of allrefer.com, so I know I didn't copy it from there. This article was created in my earliest days on Misplaced Pages, but I really do not remember where the informatin came from. I'm sure I got it from several different online sites, the Columbia Encyclopedia may have been one of them, but I don't think I would have copied it verbatim. I honestly do not remember my source. Do you want to rewrite it? Or else I can, if you think it needs to be. ]|] 20:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::When you compare the first version of with the version of from the ] is clear the are almost the same. Only the Misplaced Pages-version is a redused version. | |||
| ::I think tr best way to resolve this if you would make a new article from scrach. Posibly a stub. And when that is done delete the article and directly restore it again with only the last edits of the history. Problem gone. --] 22:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Would this be a copyright problem concerning the other edits that have been done since my first version? ]|] 22:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::The original version of the article is copyrighted by the Columbia Encyclopedia. All versions after that from the same source are also illegal. The current article is using a free licence while it has not right to be under the GNU/FDL. If you prefer I can use the VFD-procedure. I have contacted you directly to avoid that so it can be arranged more discretely. --] 21:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not trying to duck any responsibility, I just wanted to make sure that there would be no problems in doing as you suggest. I will take care of it, I just have to do some research. But as long as there are no copyright issues involved in deleting it and starting fresh, I will do so. ]|] 21:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Could you take a look at ] and let me know what you think? ]|] 02:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The EN wikipedia is not my home-wiki. I can not guaranty that if you do that you do not get complaints/problems about it. If you are not sure you should use the VFD-procedure or whatever procedure there is to deal with copyright problems. | |||
| :The new version looks very good. --] 08:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Since you previously showed interest in the former proposed policy Wikiethics, I'd like to inform you about ]. ] 15:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == mayo, deletion == | |||
| riiiiight. sorry, now i get it. | |||
| i'll come back when america knows who i am. | |||
| why can't i make a page about myself or people i know if its true? | |||
| :Because we don't know if it's true. Please read ]. Thanks for trying to help. --]] 23:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == AlternC and ASM.....and cPanel and Plesk == | |||
| I'm a student at Umass Lowell, and I work for The Community Software Lab--> | |||
| I'm unsure as to why you deleted my pages for AlternC and ASM on account of advertising... | |||
| They are extensions of ] | |||
| please tell me why the content is wrong, and the difference between my pages and ] and ] thank you. | |||
| ] 03:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please Advise== | |||
| ] 04:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Wheel War == | |||
| You do realize a wheel war requires more than one action? The fact is the block was ridiculous. If I went around blocking everyone for a week every time they told me I was stupid or abusive or didn't deserve to be an admin because I blocked over an edit war, there would be hundereds of people blocked each week in that manner. He was asked several times to reduce the block and after 2 days, decided another 8 would be enough. 10 days for what? Please review the situation before jumping on someone for a non-existant wheel war. Shell <sup>]</sup> 12:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hawthorne Caballeros Drum and Bugle Corps == | |||
| Why would you have deleted this page? It was empty but at least it was a start. --] 20:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| OK, I'm still a newbie for Misplaced Pages, so I'm not sure whether our conversation should be on your talk page or on mine. In any case, yes, the content that you mentioned was vandalism, but not grounds for deleting the entire article. It was empty but it was a framework to be filled in later at least. Is there a way to resurrect it? --] 20:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for Arbitration re: Raphael1== | |||
| Hello Zoe, you may want to add yourself to ] for arbitration begun by ] after ] his infamous list (and left Cyde and Pegasus1138's names in a historical version). ] 02:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Zoe, it's good to see your participation on this ArbCom case. One thing that I'm not seeing in the arbitration statements is a link to the ] discussion concerning ]'s block for spamming and activities concerning the deletion of his original "hit" list. You might want to add that and "exhausting the community's patience" to your statement just for clarity's sake. Cheers. ] 17:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You issued me a temporary block? You've never blocked me before our unfortunate missunderstanding regarding the title of my user page. See ] 17:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I was typing a message but got conflicted by a pagemove vandal. Anyhow, the above user has again been blocked for disruption to ]. Do you believe arbitration should be filed? RFC's not produced any results, as I'm sure you know. ]]</font> <sub>(]+])</sub> at 08:17 ] <small>(])</small> | |||
| :Should we file it now, or give him one last chance to change his ways after his most recent block? ] <sub>(]+])</sub> at 10:39 ] <small>(])</small> | |||
| :Just as you typed that, I blocked him a further 48 hours for resuming his bad habits. <tt>;)</tt> ] <sub>(]+])</sub> at 16:15 ] <small>(])</small> | |||
| ::Sigh... quote an email he sent me:<blockquote>Go take a look at the past sports pages (since February) and see that recaps are <i>italicized</i>. If you don't like it, shove it up your mothrerfucking ass.</blockquote> ] <sub>(]+])</sub> at 05:22 ] <small>(])</small> | |||
| :::Apologies for insinuating myself into this discussion. An RfAR might be necessary, inasmuch as NN, concomitant to his valuable edits, disrupts certain sports-related pages significantly; I'm honestly not certain that we can characterize the net effect of his contributions as constructive. I must say that I'm genuinely surprised at the incivility of his reply to NSLE; I always thought that his ostensible intransigence stemmed primarily from ignorance of policy and an inability properly to understand the entreaties others made to him on his talk page and at the RfC, but it seems that he well understands that many of his edits are unencyclopedic and simply doesn't care. His unwillingness to collaborate or to listen to the suggestions of others is most unfortunate and leads one to wonder whether he properly appreciates the nature of the project. ] 05:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbcom discussion == | |||
| Hi Zoe. It seems others are commenting too. There doesn't seem to be a formal talk page related to the case yet; could you please point me to the rules about this? — ] 02:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I see; fair enough. Given there's nowhere else for me to clarify the situation re. the GA rules, however, I'll leave the comment as is and hope the clerks refactor it appropriately. — ] 02:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Vlad III Dracula == | |||
| It was the real person. ] 18:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *I haven't actually seen the episode in question, as it isn't currently available on home video, but the IMDb lists the real person. I'm not sure how this is either, but he apparently appears in an episode entitled "Transylvania, January 1918". ] 18:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Fir0002's sig == | |||
| Just to let you know he did remove the external link as soon as I pointed it out at the start of the RFA (see ]). ] 21:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] | ] 11:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Same here... what vandalism? == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| My ISP switched my ip 2-3 days ago.... (stupid dynamic ip...) oh well, when did this incident happen? Was it an anonymous edit? Note: I haven't "logged" on to wikipedia for several months... heres your message: | |||
| Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Cheers, | |||
| Ryan | |||
| == Article Un-redirect == | |||
| If an article went on Afd and consensus was to redirect to another article, what's the best place to go for a user afterwards to get the page reinstated? For deleted pages ] would be the right place, but since the page wasn't actually deleted I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. -- ] 15:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I've given my thoughts on the same question ]. I'd be interested in seeing Zoe's take on it too, so Zoe may or may not want to read what I said first... :) '''<font color="green">]</font>]''']: ]/] 15:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Can you tell me what article you're talking about? I would have to know the history of the AfD discussion and see what sort of content you plan on re-adding to remove the redirect. User:Zoe|(talk) 15:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: See Lar's link above for my reply to him with the details. (Also, please reply either on his page or here instead of on my page. I hate split discussions. Thanks) -- ] 15:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't see any reply on Lar's page. ]|] 15:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::: My bad. Didn't notice I got an edit conflict when I tried to submit it. Should be there now -- ] 15:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Lyrics == | |||
| Oh, sorry. I just thought that was the whole point of the article. Sorry. But, Since they are copyrighted why do the other Sonic The Hedgehog game songs have lyrics? | |||
| == These song pages have lyrics == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| == Nordwave should be included in Winkepedia == | |||
| Nordwave should be included in Winkepedia.I was adding Nordwave to the list of groups that would fall into that category.I do agree with you assesment of th Protocols page.Next time I will include refernces to any changes I make. | |||
| == help me == | |||
| i , paydenmac34, would like to delete the riot bros. and payden durham pages, can you delete it for me. | |||
| p.s. i am payden durham, and am deeply sorry!!!!!!!!1 | |||
| == Message == | |||
| Thanks, I'm actually pretty new to this Misplaced Pages stuff, so thank your for helping me out. | |||
| == Messages == | |||
| Ok thanks. ] 20:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Raphael1 RFAR == | |||
| Just so you know, ] is going to be entering the voting stage soon. Since you are listed as an involved party you most likely will want to add your statement to the ] before the evidence period ends. --] 17:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Time is running out ... ] 16:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion of Don Voss == | |||
| You deleted "Don Voss" because there are "thousands of college football players". That may be true, but there are not thousands of college football players who were All-Americans, played in the Rose Bowl, and also will be named to their University's Football Hall of Fame. | |||
| Thanks for the lack of thought in deleting the article. Wiki is a waste if no one cares to understand what they are deleting. Maybe someone with football knowledge should only delete football players?! | |||
| Dissapointing. Done with Misplaced Pages. | |||
| :Please note that although I ''nominated'' the article for deletion, I did not delete it. The discussion at ] was properly concluded. If you disagree with the ''process'', not the votes, you may submit it to ] for a rehearing. ]|] 15:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 5000 copies == | |||
| I'm still waiting for a policy on this statement. Where does Misplaced Pages say this on ] or ]? ] 23:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Your comment Re: Mending Wall on deletion review == | |||
| Can I ask you where I might have said anything that might be construed as a personal attack? -- ] 19:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I actually wasn't thinking of you at all when I wrote that; after all, your AfD nomination says "transwiki to wikisource" so I was under the impression that you thought it ''was'' legally in the public domain and you were nominating it for some other reason. I was thinking of Robertsteadman, who in my opinion maintained a very insistent campaign based on the convolution of two issues: 1) a misunderstanding of copyright law, and 2) his believe that the poem was non-notable. He was in error on the first part, and he was rather insistent about it, and if he had listened to the suggestions of others (perhaps the first time Xoloz suggested the problem might be a difference in US vs. UK copyright law) it would have saved us all a lot of time. (The non-notability, was of course debatable, and was debated.) Perhaps you made a mistake also in the AfD nomination, if you were thinking AfD is the proper place to discuss a possible copyright problem that could be easily removed from the article. But you should not read more into my words than I say; if I say you or another user has made an error, that is not a personal attack, nor is it intended as one. -- ] 21:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I certainly never said ''anyone'' shouldn't have expressed an opinion, but I continue to maintain that the assertion the poem was a copy-vio was a clear error from the start—unless ] was wrong, and then it should have been hashed out there first with interested users who (presumably) know a bit about copyright law. That is what I intended to say the first time, and I do not believe it is a personal attack; if you think it is, I would be interested to hear why and perhaps I'll reconsider. -- ] 21:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 24 Minutes, CRU, Gategoer- Destroyed == | |||
| Fair enough. If you do not want this on the website, then so be it. But next time, give a good reason why it should be deleted instead of because it is about a local school. Explain why, because from my point of view, you and others seemed to blow 24 Minutes out of the water. Now my first entries were false, yes, but I just wanted to see what would happen to them if posted. Posting the false is my fault, but 24 Minutes was REAL, not a lie. I thought it would be proactive to display a parody of 24 because it went with the topic. Yes, I defended my page because if I didn't, it would be destroyed anyway, so I gave it a shot, it failed. I bet if you were in my shoes, you would do everything to save an article that you worked on, or at least figure out why it was unfit to be here. I really hoped the environment of Misplaced Pages would be more excepting to articles written along with other important topics. I can say this, you do find the false and delete it quicky, I support that. But, if the topic was connected to another, I just don't see why it can't stay. I only been here for 24 hours, that's it. I don't know all the rules and regulations, but I do know that this is a website that offers free knowledge to all around the world. Then doesn't that give the world the free chance to share some of their factual culture to the world? Does it hurt anyone if a page stands that doesn't quite follow all the rules? If it does, I'm sorry. But please, be more proactive and make others, not just myself, understand why what they written was wrong. If everyone in the world were less accepting, we would all be in a world war, but were not. We, to the best of our ability, try to have an open mind about other things, and not shoot them down. If people didn't give Edison the chance to invent the light bulb, phonograph, movie camera, cement, etc., we wouldn't have those things today. My point of this is that instead of just posting delete on something, saying -doesn't work- explain why to them so they could redue it or let it go. By the way, why are spending so much of your time on this webpape everyday, looking at everyone's work? Go outside and enjoy your life instead of staying indoors, staring at a computer screen. I know I will be. -Gategoer | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thanks for your reasoned reponse to my comments on the Alienus unblocking. I was getting frustrated and I think my comments were stronger than they needed to be. I appreciate your not escalating past my own strong comments. ]|] 00:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :No no, your comments were quite appropriate. RfC is the right thing to do with an admin who consistently breaches policy, which I did. I do apologize. I complain about admins who block too easily, but maybe I'm an admin who unblocks too easily. Well, it's OK to challenge a block, but I have to follow procedure. -] <sup>] </sup> 01:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Capitol Cigar Store == | |||
| Hi Zoe! Yes, very clever... but at the same time a bit dim (so very easy to see through what they were doing!). I've corrected the close I did on the AfD to remove your name - although you have to admit that, at a glance, the deletion history page doesn't tell you ''why'' it was deleted, just ''who'' did it! ]<b><font color="red">]</font><font color="green">]</font><font color="red">]</font></b> 22:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Kennedyjohnson.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE"> An image or media file that you uploaded, ], has been listed at ]. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Idw --></div> | |||
| Zoe: I just read through your short list (only June this year). You sure are involved in a lot of deleting. I don't know who has what job around here, is your job deleting articles? Is June the month you delete alot? Is this an unusual month - a lot of writers showing up who don't know what they are talking about? Is June slow month for this? One guy said he was here for only twenty four hours. Is that a long time, a short time? Was he lucky to be here that long? How could he have had more than 24 hours, if he wanted it? As an editor, that sure seems like a short time to decide he didn't belong here, but I didn't see his story. It must have had every error a story could possibly have to last a mere 24 hours. How did you derive at 24 hours or less (or possibly a little more) as enough time for a writers story to stay in Misplaced Pages? I thought that this was a public place, I would have given the guy a week or so. Especially if it were his first piece. Do you also decide which stories are taking up too much space for no good reason and, that 24 hours is good? Is the public happy with that? How do you know? Lastly, do you own part of the Misplaced Pages? Is there any money in it? Are there shares open for sale? Thanks, ] 00:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Bud Whiteye | |||
| ::No, Zoe just loves deleting things she doesn't agree with. She can always call them "copyright violations" or some such nonsense. Here definiton of ''fair use'' is "if I personally think it's fair, then it's fair use; if not, it isn't." She could care less where the image is sourced or cited. Even she doesn't like it, she wipes it. And there's nothing you can do. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Zoe's troll ground. You'd think an attractive girl like her would have some sort of social life, wouldn't you. ] 00:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Bud Whiteye == | |||
| Zoe: Thanks for your kind reply. I '''am''' writing about the Sarnia Area pollution. From the first word, I never felt I was writing anything else. I have read about Chernobyl in the Wiki and other places, ugly as it is, it has forced its place in history. The whole world knows about Chernobyl through encyclopedias and other sources, primary or as in the Misplaced Pages. Such disasters as Chernobyl should be revealed to the world. The disasters at Aamjiwnaang are no less horrible. It is not my point of view alone that Sarnia, Aamjiwnaang and all those affected by "Chemical Valley" see the pollution as anything less than a disaster. Nobody knew about Krakatoa until somebody went there, took some notes, revealed some evidence and wrote about it. Historians and writers are good like that. My article may have some gliches, but it is about the disaster on-going at Aamjiwnaang. Zoe, why does it have to be about Sarnia? Sarnians know how to write. They can as easily link to Aamjiwnaang, when they chose to write about '''the disaster'''. One of your colleagues expressed a kind of "systemic discrimination" upon certain stories that keep some articles from not appearing or enjoying great debate. Is an Aboriginal story, written by an Aboriginal one of those special kinds of discrimination? I'm not inserting this as a qualifier for my story. I know you would not accept it as such. My defense of the story stops for now, with '''"...the disaster"''' in bold above. Your site manager runs all of our words together. You asked if I had any Qs, that is one. I would hate for the eventualities at Aamjiwnaang go un-noticed because of a bias not listed in your criteria. Thanks again, Bud Whiteye] 02:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| What criterion for speedy deletion did this image meet? Thank you for reverting the BBIH vandalism on my UT page, incidentally. —] (]) 02:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| - I would like to know, Zoe, why you tend to want to delete things just like that? Are you incharge here? If so, I understand your desire to edit everything, but if not, then what business do you have deleting other people's article?. I know you can hear me. And I know you know the source of this question. I'm still a little ticked that I received no reply from you about why you wanted to delete my articles so badly, when they've been posted for less than 2 days! I've only been here for 2 days now. If it was a rule violation, then just say so. If it was a misunderstanding, say so. Don't expect me and all other newcomers to know what you mean when we just walked through the door! Give us a break, please. I started friendly and with good intentions but now you seem to throw things against the door. Why? Why nice one minute and rude the next? I didn't ask for this! I asked for a little understanding, give me a break! And I'm back again just to see if you could give me a decent response to why my artcles were so bad. And once you do that, then tell me what I can write and can't write. Is it that diffucult and tedious to ask? I want peace and understanding. I hoped that Misplaced Pages's environment was peaceful, but now it's more like battlefield, edit this, destroy that. If this wepsite was BUILT FOR EVERYONE, then shouldn't the creator of an article have a say in their article's future? Please Respond so I can understand why you are so angry at me. | |||
| That's just good ol' Zoe, no matter if you are new to Misplaced Pages or have something to contribute. And don't get her started on "Neutral Point of View." You'll probably have to wait a long time for a response, too. A classic example of Wiki Administrators run wild. She unfairly and without reservation maligns even minimal contributions from first-time contributors.] 03:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Yep. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Otherwise known as "Zoe's domain." Whatever she doesn't like, she wipes, and always has some excuse about "violating copyright," etc. even when there's no such violation. Especially if you're new. Then she accuses everyone who agrees with you of being a sockpuppet. Typical frustrated fangirl. ] 00:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Morwen's RFC == | |||
| I agree that the two parties endorsing the RFC are potentially the same editor, and I've filed a RFCU to determine whether this is the case. I saw your comment, and thought you'd like to know. -]<sup>]</sup> 20:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == justice court pt2 == | |||
| ] was just created, by ], the creator of ]. Sorry to add to your workload, but i'm not terribly familiar with mfd procedures yet, and am hoping that you might be more streamlined at dealing with this. Thanks :) -] 21:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == SCAG == | |||
| The watchdog group was just a program to compile statistics | |||
| If that offended you just delete the program page.] 21:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Fine as I said before just delete the program, not the sponsor. | |||
| :'''Reply''' | |||
| I am not creating 'fiefdoms', I would not be Poobah of SCAG | |||
| you deleted the series before I was able to post restrictions to the | |||
| Chancellor. My emergency powers must be relinquished when a Governance Council is seated. The executive would be the Chair | |||
| which has to be elected. ] 01:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Zoe== | |||
| Thanks again for your response (a quick one; over in a page where I tried to reach all of the editors (I wrote them all) who had concerns. I have only your reply (NPOV) and a sentence that includes "...please don't hesitate to ask." So, I did. I explained that everyone, including the manufacturers hold the view on how polluted Aamjiwnaang and Sarnia are. Then I asked some technical q's to try to be inkeeping with Wiki Policies. Now, this is in "My Page" (Bud Whiteye) can you get this from here? Thanks, Bud Whiteye Bud Whiteye 22:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC) '''ZOE''', I brought this over from my "Talk" page; I didn't know what else to do. No one has told me yet where to write where editors who have concerns can read (my) our responses. Thanks Bud Whiteye ] 22:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Zoe from Bud == | |||
| Zoe: I left you a short note today (June 20, late PM) in your "Talk" page. BW] 22:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks Zoe == | |||
| I didn't think you were going to get back to me. I must have hit an artery: I'm getting some good responses now. Editor Z told me that since my article is "out there" (Google, Anishenabek News, and so on) it is not OR. Are you both right - somhow? I believe the world and Wiki readers would be well served if they had this information as a resource, a place to turn in researching the world's polluted sites - might help them get a PhD. I can't understand why most editors are stuck on "Op-ed, or news article. The information and the people dying or not being born are still there. I am a writer. If the information needs to be put another way (as in Chernobyl), why can't that be done? Again, thanks for your timely and good reply. Bud Whiteye] 23:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Anon leaving "warnings" == | |||
| *Whoever {{IPvandal|71.158.149.97}} is, he's just gotta make you smile. ] 01:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **Sometimes. ]|] 01:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Zoe == | |||
| Thanks Zoe: This is the first time you have said I could do a re-write. I believe another editor would like me to as well. I am a writer, most writers are used to rewrites and multiple editing (usually by one and the same editor) that never means one is a bad writer, it means the editor knows what they want and the piece has not yet achieved those parameters set by the editor - based on the rules set by the publisher (publication). BTW This story is from many places, if you check, you'll notice that google did not get it from Wiki. How much time do I have to do a rewrite? BW] 12:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ? == | |||
| Do you have any objections to me starting a group to calculate statistics. One of the programs would calculate mediation success. | |||
| There would be no admin programs. ] 20:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I need a group because this would be a massive undertaking, involving quite a few volunteers. The statistics would be used to | |||
| make a better encyclopedia and would verify official statistics.(Example:Mediation success rate could be used to estimate how many | |||
| cases go to Arbcom). I will have oversight boards so there will be | |||
| no grand high poobah. Also I would like to put the past behind us. | |||
| ] 23:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The statistics (for mediation program) would be used to help the Arbcom predict how many cases they will receive. The statistics in | |||
| other programs will state their purpose in the program plan. I have no plans to collect statistics that will be used to harass people. | |||
| ] 23:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| That was one possible program. Another would determine how many specialist admins there are] 20:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :A specialist admin is a administrator who indicates a focus on a certain aspect on their listing on the sysop category. By tallying up the number of Admins with each specialty, you can | |||
| see where Misplaced Pages has the least admins focusing. Data collection would involve counting how many Admins are in each specialty. The only list would have numbers, and zero names.] 20:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == I'll never contribute again! == | |||
| Congratulations! Thanks to your original problem with "NPOV" of a man murdered by another man who had a quite lucid, non-neutral point of view about racism, and your mistreatment of "sock puppets", "noobs", and other first-time users, you have driven me away from ever joining the Misplaced Pages community. I don't have to hide behind an IP address, either. I cannot help but to feel sad that something I liked and enjoyed was ruined. I wonder if this makes Danny Lilithborne smile to know another useless, faceless, nobody will get swept out of Misplaced Pages because of you. | |||
| Best of luck in future endeavors. My username will be deleted in two days. ] 05:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :How sad that you were unable to transform Misplaced Pages into your own soapbox. ]|] 20:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your wish is my command, Excellency. | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions#Requested | |||
| ] 18:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Could you please take a look at ] (ok so that's not how | |||
| you can link to a contrib page apparently. link should work) ? His only | |||
| contribs seem to be adding links to one specific site to a heap of WW1 articles. While the | |||
| site may actually be appropriate for a good deal of them, it still smells like linkspam to | |||
| me, and out of place in at least the ] article (which is where I | |||
| first noticed it). -- ] 14:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Nevermind I guess, ] already reverted all of them -- ] 18:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Andrew Cooper Talk == | |||
| Why did you delete the andrew cooper talk page, we were simply putting our case forward to re-instate the page, the subject matter himself was also posting a valid reason for it to stay, you culled an article before it had a chance to grow and have sources added to it, you are clearly a poor Mod | |||
| == O'Reilly Controversies Article == | |||
| I didn't delete the red cross section, I moved it to ] article. | |||
| Please before reverting edits check the summeries. | |||
| ==Minnesota Meetup== | |||
| A direct quote from O'Reilly reguarding the peabody award was not nessesary it wasted space. | |||
| <hr style="background:#fc6; border:#0cf 10px dotted;"> | |||
| But I will leave that alone. | |||
| <div style="float:left; padding:10px 10px 0 0; clear:left">]</div><div style="float:left; clear:none; padding:10px"><div style="font-size:150%; padding-bottom:0.5em">2009</div><div style="font-size:120%">Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.<br/> ].<br/></div></div><div style="font-size:100%; float:right; padding:10px">Please share this with anyone who may be interested. </div> | |||
| <hr style=" clear:both; background:#fc6; border:#0cf 10px dotted;"> | |||
| <div style="clear:both; font-size:xx-small; text-align:right;">Delivered by ] (]) 22:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| == Fanboy rubbish == | |||
| ] Hello Zoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''4''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Charles Wadsworth}}</small> (I'm trying to exspand it)--] (]) 16:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| What are you talking about? You don't know anything about him, or where he works. Who are you to say, "Hardly"? | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Ivan Davis}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Marsha Mason}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Robert E. Connick}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 23:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == November 9, 1985 listed at ] == | |||
| == removing the world 111 Fally Rampage == | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''November 9, 1985'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| YOUR A FUCKERN RETARD FOR REMOVIND SHADOOMS ARTICLE!! ::GM:: | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| Sry that my article has caused GM to start insulting u ] | |||
| :May I translate that for you Zoe? This anon is saying "ban me for personal attacks plz!!!!1!!" ] 10:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> -- ] (]) - 03:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Molobo's talk == | |||
| The AfD result was a- ''''' 'Keep' ''''' result!--] (]) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your decisive action at ], removing insults. Yet I wonder if should be restored? Their entries should stay documented IMHO.--] 16:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==File source problem with File:NurembergTrials.jpg== | |||
| Can I finish? | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Misplaced Pages's ], ]. If the image is ] and ], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)''' per ] criterion ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] <sup>]</sup> 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kinston Indians == | |||
| == Pokemon/Blastoise listed at ] == | |||
| Hi. I notice you had a bunch of A-level minor leaguers' articles deleted at ]. Just curious why you didn't include ], ], ] and ]? I figure maybe they just weren't grouped with the rest. Just wanted to make sure before I bring those to AFD as well. Thanks. :) —] (]) 10:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Blastoise'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Pokemon/Bulbasaur listed at ] == | |||
| == User Pete Peters == | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Bulbasaur'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at ] == | |||
| Could you look over his contributions and consider a block for vandalism? | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Mewtwo'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks ] 01:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at ] == | |||
| == GFDL == | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokemon/Mewtwo'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] 18:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC). | |||
| ==Awards== | |||
| I don't understand your objection. I've reworded my statement, but I don't see how deleting and merging violates GFDL. Cheers! ]<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| During your 5 years hear, you made enough edits to become a ] grade editor.] (]) 12:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{User Labutnum}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
| Well it was more than five years, but at any rate, due to the recent Service award reforms, your level was actually these:<br clear="all"/> | |||
| {{Labutnum III Userbox}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
| {{Senior Editor III Userbox}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
| {{Senior Editor III Ribbon}}<br clear="all"/> | |||
| It says that this account was compromised... if you have a new account, you may of course count the start time and edits of this (old) account in determining your service award level for the new account. | |||
| At any rate, thank you for your long service and many contributions to the Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the note, you were right. I've changed my vote to merge and redirect.--<font color="ff6633"><font face="comic sans MS" size=+1>Joe ] '''('''<small>] ]</small>''')'''</font></font> 03:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :Thanks for the comment. I'll change the way I say it from now on. ]<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| == A page you started (Muscat) has been reviewed! == | |||
| ''rm PROD, [[WP:POINT[[ violation. Changed "starred" to appeared".'' | |||
| Thanks for creating ], Zoe! | |||
| So, how are those mind-reading courses going? Not so well, I can tell you. So what part of my ''prod: '''Very minor''' actor'' was unclear? Hint 1: "very minor" had nothing to do with whether he is, in fact, a minor. A quick glance at the IMDB listing would have provided a further clue.*Hint 2: whether he "starred"/"appeared"/"did handstands" is not relevant to the first three words of the prod reasoning. Citing that as your apparent rationale for removing the Prod strikes as you violating ] yourself -- you know, disrupting the Proposed Deletion process to make some sort of point. Oh, the irony. --] | ] 04:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Misplaced Pages editor ] just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you: | |||
| == ISG == | |||
| <blockquote>Reviewed, well done!</blockquote> | |||
| I have started the ]. it has been MfD , please | |||
| review to see if it should be deleted.G]o. 01:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's ]. | |||
| == Ebenezer == | |||
| <small>Learn more about ].</small> | |||
| If you bother to look, you'd see I WROTE the amazon.com piece--and it wasn't an exact copy that was posted here. | |||
| ] (]) 02:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
| If you don't want contributions say so. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| You could have spoken to me before you go deleting. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 08:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ] 21:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| If you contacted me first, I could have removed the Amazon piece--and it wasn't a rip-off. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 18:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| If you checked the time stamps, you would have seen the article was written BEFORE the Amazon piece was posted. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 19:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ] 21:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Would you re-instate the page if I remove the amazon.com review and check the npov? | |||
| <blockquote>Fictional being/race. No indication of passing ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ] 15:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Thanks; will the same page name be accepted? | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 05:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ] 17:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ==TfD== | |||
| <blockquote>No indication this fictional character passes ]/]. Pure ].</blockquote> | |||
| I think a potentially very disruptive template is on verge of being kept. If you have time, please take a look at this TfD discussion. Regards. ] | ] 21:44, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == A Request for Your Feedback == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Hello; I noticed you have recently contributed to the ] and thought you would be interested in looking at a proposal for redesigning the page. If you can, please take a look at ] and provide some feedback on ]. So far, very little feedback has been received, and so the additional input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. ]]] 23:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 06:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Hands Off Venezuela == | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Hi, | |||
| <blockquote>No evidence this fictional group of characters passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| I took the info from the Hands Off Venezuela site itself (www.handsoffvenezuela.org), and the site you pointed at took it from the original source. Sorry about the captalisation, shall I just start from scratch or move the article? | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| (sorry I am new with adding Misplaced Pages entries but would like to get more involved) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Maarten | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==Are your ears burning?== | |||
| FYI, someone is ]. ] has approached a couple of people to query your deletion of his article. ]<sup>]</sup> 09:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 13:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| I believe that I must read the "How to write a Wiki". I need to work on my unbiased narrative voice. Thank you very much for reminding me about the sandbox, both Joe Motiki and Ian Serota were experiments on how to wiki. After more experimenting/practicing, I believe that I can tackle wanted articles. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Thank You Again, | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Josh | |||
| <blockquote>Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure ]. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| PS Sorry for publishing useless articles | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == please undelete ] == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| 00:36, 5 July 2006 Zoe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Malini Fonseka" <nowiki>(content was: '{{csd}}{{hangon}}'''Malini Fonseka''' is a Sri Lankan film actor. ==External links=={{imdb-name|0284717}}[[Category:Living p...')</nowiki> | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| *I had added <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> and some relevant text, but the article wasn't finished. Could you please take a look at the IMDb link on that page which will show you the actor's films? If you think the actor is notable, please undelete the article. ] (] | ] 00:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == Oh mistress of the dark == | |||
| <blockquote>Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure ]. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| In the article on a ], <br/> | |||
| A ] I think is in breach,<br/> | |||
| So could please say <br/> | |||
| To User JJay, <br/> | |||
| "That reversion's a bit of a reach."<br/> | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 01:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| : *Sigh* And reverting a fairly tidy-up of the guideline as well. - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 00:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ::Wow, dispute resolution! Who are you and what have you done with Zoe? *chuckle* - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 00:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ::: Did you ever have the thing where you're having a conversation and one side isn't going the way you expect? I'm having that now. I thought that you wouldn't mind chiming in on a clear-cut external links question. I was slightly suprised by both the content and the tone of the response, so I made a small joke at your expense as banter. I didn't intend to get you cut, so I'm sorry if I did. - ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 02:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == Massive deletion of articles == | |||
| <blockquote>No indication this fictional race passes ]/]. Pure ]. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Who is "Zoe", anyway? Perhaps he or she already explained that these animated ones from the ] claimed to be "not verifable". Will you please note that ] or ] only in the late 1980s/early 1990s for a short time have all been deleted only last year. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| The Weather Channel? - This channel runs nothing, but weather, except for the occasional segments of home, garden and etc. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| --] 06:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :If you're going to write on my Talk page, please at least try to be coherent. ]|] 21:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| I will be coherent. The Weather Channel as I have said before, is nothing, but weather forecasting, except for the occasional segments of home improvement, garden and etc. | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| :And how does that have any relation to me? ]|] 17:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>No indication this very minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == April 20, 2006 == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Anyone can probably create an article about the plane crash near Bloomington, Indiana, it happened on April 20, 2006, in a densely-wooded area, but this was far more tragic. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| --] 05:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ==Addendum to "Here is my attack"== | |||
| ] | |||
| Well, I hace confessed to vandalizing for the past several months, and for permanently scarring my reputation. I want to state now that Tex's contention that I haven't left is entirely false, I only came back on the 23rd to voice my opinion against RobChurch, and his RfA. | |||
| Well, my attack: I am sorry for being the CIyde vandal and for my attacks on John Reid. I am sorry that I came here, stressing myself, and others out. To further emphasize this, I did create an account with the intention of it being constructive after a three month long meltdown. Hopefully, I will be able to edit constructively, and I am sorry for all the trouble I cause. Yes, people reform, and to be honest, the point of the vandalism was to attract attention to what I see as incivility, and the reasons several of my friends have left here. | |||
| But vandalism is vandalism, so I better quit before I get in trouble. | |||
| I am sorry I was ever apart of the project. I DONT want to be a Brian Chase. But, at least I did edit here constructively for a year and three months before I went haywire.]]]]14:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>No indication this very minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ::'''Addendum:''' It is my wish to make it clear that I want to return to the encyclopedia, and I am asking that my block may be lifted so I can continue my work here. I sincerely apologize for my actions.]]]]16:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for helping me so much ] | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| I am deeply sorry for the sins I have commited here. I hope my reëntry here will be sincerely welcomed. ]]]] 19:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>No indication this minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ==My undoing of blocks== | |||
| Hi, Zoe. I understand that you're a disinterested party and that you commented in good faith on my unblocking actions wrt His excellency. I don't know if you saw His excellency's explanation that, just as I said, I only made a real block change once--that the other time was me trying to fix a technical problem? The block had expired (this was Woohookitty's one-week block), but HE still couldn't edit, and several admins on IRC tried to fix it. As I understand it, there was a capitalization discrepancy (Excellency/excellency) which was keeping Jeffrey Gustafsson's supposedly undone indefinite block still active. I saw it and fixed it (rather proud of myself, being no techie :-)) There was no question of me undoing a valid block; HE was *supposed* to be able to edit. If this is unclear, please let me know. I'll be glad to ask a developer or whatever to explain what happened, and then perhaps you could see your way to withdrawing your statement on ANI that I, uh, said the thing which was not? It makes me uncomfortable to see it there, coming from a super-respectable admin like yourself. ] | ] 00:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC). | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == wp:jimbo makes mistakes == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| unfortunately, i don't know just how "pov rant"ish this essay was, because you deleted it, but it doesn't seem to be a valid candidate for speedy deletion. also, the deletion policy doesn't say anything about deleting articles in the wikipedia namespace. wikipedia essays are defined as "Essays about Misplaced Pages and related topics. These are not policy and are primarily opinion pieces.", so i don't see why you can delete an essay becuase it is POV. maybe it did deserve deletion, but i feel you should use the afd process and let the community decide. --] 19:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == auctionbytes == | |||
| <blockquote>No indication this very minor supporting character passes ]/]. Pure ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Auctionbytes is the premier online newletter for the online auction community. | |||
| Yes, it is a "business" and yes I did link to it. | |||
| No, it is not my website. | |||
| I find it strange that you would remove it from Misplaced Pages.... | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I know how to participate content in this forum... | |||
| in fact I supplied statistics in Paypal that I was the source of and collected when Paypal first began...very valuable stats I might add. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Are you the assigned Moderator of this (eBay) forum? | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| -Me | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == A new userbox you might like. == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi Zoe, | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| I couldn't resist making the following userbox after reading the attached link. After being insulted on numerous occasions by trolls I decided to fight back the best way I know how -- with a witty userbox! Feel free to remove this from your talk page if you don't appreciate the humour. = ) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Cheers, | |||
| <blockquote>Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure ] and list of appearances in media. Fails ], ], ]. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| <span style="border: 1px solid">]''']'''</span> 05:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| {{User:Netsnipe/User_Bureaucratic_Fuck}} | |||
| <br clear=both /> | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == shrug == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Please do not remove commercial links or links that in your frontal lobe beleives is my private website linked on Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for sticking one's head in the sand or a mere collection of ONE individual's opinion what is or is not related to a company and/or industry. You are, however, encouraged to smile and not take yourself so seriously instead of removing links from the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be removed from the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than removing it. See the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thanks. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: There are no assigned moderators == | |||
| == "Octagon, disambiguation" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Octagon, disambiguation'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 06:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| so if there are no assigned moderators how is it that YOU have the power to prevent me from future posting? | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 08:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Someone has sent for the cabal! == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| A ] request has been filed in which you are named as a party. Please comment at ]. Remember, there is no cabal! ] (]) 10:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 00:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Might want to be aware... == | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| Of this edit after your recent block of an abusive editor. -- ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 02:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>I don't think this page is needed.</blockquote> | |||
| *Hope you're still watching, same user is still at it in the AfD's in question. I've reported him appropriately for blocking, but it'd be good to know an admin is watching, since this guy manages to keep pulling out sockpuppets. -- ''']''' (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 02:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
| == My comment == | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Talk%3ACarl+XVI+Gustaf|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> ] (]) 02:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| It was inexplicable to me at the time but I then had the bright idea of looking at your contribs and then I did indeed understand your action as may be clear from my edit (if you saw it) to the afd on Tramper. I have removed my comment and this socks too, ] 03:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| Thanks for sorting all that out. I usually laugh at inane rants (such as the type the user has left on my talk page), but when they start to gather extra-wikipedia info about me (and info about meatspace) it becomes worrying. For a while, anyway. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 1#BokmaalAndNynorsk}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="border:1px solid;padding:2px 6px;font-variant:small-caps">'''〜 ] • ]'''</span> 06:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == According to WP policies and guidelines, == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| your comments on the village pump should only consider the ''content'' of my proposal, and not only the small editcount of my username. Ad personam comments are generally considered uncivil, and I have replied to you on that talkpage. ] 08:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == Unblocking == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| I had my account blocked indefinitely, and no good reason for it. ] blocked ] indefinitely because "(sock of Panairjdde, who is under 24-hour block)", and blocked ] indefinitely because "(he says he has closed this account;" | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| What should I do? What is the procedure to follow when you think an Admin abused his powers?--] 10:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Admins abuse their powers all the time, giving blocks and indef blocks as they like or unlike someone. There is practically nothing you could do. ] 12:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hah. There are plenty of places to get help. Contact another admin (as this user intelligently did) or present your case on ]. There are many non-admins there as well watching over things, including me. --]] 12:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 28 December 2024
 Archives |
|---|
|
|
Please don't leave
Please don't leave, Zoe. I'm very saddened by what happened in the last few days, but it can blow over. We've never edited the same articles, and would probably disagree on a lot, but I've always seen you as someone who cared a lot about Misplaced Pages and who was good for the project. I am quite sure that Jimbo would not want his hasty words to lead to any permanent hurt, and it's quite obvious from looking at his contributions that he was preoccupied with real life matters for a few days after his phonecall with Mr Pierce, which would explain why no notification of that phonecall was given to the community. It's also clear that his post on WP:AN/I was written hastily, as he had been away from Misplaced Pages for a few days before, and didn't post anything immediately after, so it's very likely that he forced himself to find time to make a post in order to close the matter immediately, but didn't take the time word it in such a way as to take into account that you were trying to protect Misplaced Pages and that you didn't know it had been resolved. His own words on his talk page two days later indicate that he did not have any wish to hurt you. Please, Zoe, don't let this lead to a permanent break with Misplaced Pages. You are highly valued here. Musical Linguist 17:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Desysopped
In case you return, someone just used your account (among others) saying it had been hacked. It's been emergency desysopped. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- In case you just randomly read this page: I miss you. - brenneman 23:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- From that old discussion, I don't see why anyone had to make such a big fuss about it. Thankfully, they're both in better places now. PotentialDanger (talk) 21:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nandor (Middle-earth)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nandor (Middle-earth), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Otto Fruhner
Zoe,
You once deleted Otto Fruhner because a vandal had posted nonsense. As a matter of politesse, I am informing you that I am re-establishing it as a legitimate biographical article of a World War I flyer.
Georgejdorner (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:H59543.png
File:H59543.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:USS Monitor-H59543.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Misplaced Pages, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Misplaced Pages, in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Devoucoux
An article that you have been involved in editing, Devoucoux, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Devoucoux (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unionsoap (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I linked it to Sare in the Basque contrie and horse tackel. The AfD result was a ' Keep ' result.Wipsenade (talk) 09:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Minnesota Meetup
2009Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.Details under discussion.
Please share this with anyone who may be interested.
Delivered by Jonathunder (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 17 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Charles Wadsworth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (I'm trying to exspand it)--Wipsenade (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ivan Davis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Marsha Mason - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Robert E. Connick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
November 9, 1985 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect November 9, 1985. Since you had some involvement with the November 9, 1985 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mistakefinder (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Lists of cemeteries by country
I have nominated Lists of cemeteries by country, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lists of cemeteries by country. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
The AfD result was a- 'Keep' result!--Wipsenade (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:NurembergTrials.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:NurembergTrials.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly 08:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Blastoise listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Blastoise. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Blastoise redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Bulbasaur listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Bulbasaur. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Bulbasaur redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Mewtwo. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Mewtwo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon/Mewtwo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon/Mewtwo. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon/Mewtwo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 18:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC).
Awards
During your 5 years hear, you made enough edits to become a Labutnum grade editor.Wipsenade (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 | This editor is a Labutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, and Sticky Note. |
Well it was more than five years, but at any rate, due to the recent Service award reforms, your level was actually these:
 | This editor is a Labutnum of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, Sticky Note, Bookmark, and Note from Jimbo. |
 | This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star. |
It says that this account was compromised... if you have a new account, you may of course count the start time and edits of this (old) account in determining your service award level for the new account.
At any rate, thank you for your long service and many contributions to the Misplaced Pages. Herostratus (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Cinhil Haldane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cinhil Haldane is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cinhil Haldane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Muscat) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Muscat, Zoe!
Misplaced Pages editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed, well done!
To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
SamHolt6 (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Baguio (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baguio (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Baguio (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Torenth (fictional) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torenth (fictional) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Torenth (fictional) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Javan Haldane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javan Haldane is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Javan Haldane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Maia (Middle-earth)
The article Maia (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional being/race. No indication of passing WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Aulë
The article Aulë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this fictional character passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nandor (Middle-earth)
The article Nandor (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this fictional group of characters passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nandor (Middle-earth) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandor (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nandor (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Aulë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aulë is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aulë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ulmo
The article Ulmo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)#Ulmo
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Manwë
The article Manwë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)#Manwë
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Edain
The article Edain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this fictional race passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Edain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edain is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Edain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Celeborn
The article Celeborn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nienna
The article Nienna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Yavanna
The article Yavanna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Varda
The article Varda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Manwë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manwë is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Manwë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ulmo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulmo is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ulmo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ossë
The article Ossë has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Celeborn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celeborn is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Celeborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Varda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varda is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Varda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ossë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ossë is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ossë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
"Octagon, disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Octagon, disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Octagon, disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Aman (Tolkien) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aman (Tolkien) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aman (Tolkien) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Calaquendi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calaquendi is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Calaquendi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf
A tag has been placed on Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
I don't think this page is needed.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Interstellarity (talk) 02:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Miracle Worker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Miracle Worker is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Miracle Worker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dan from A.P. (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
"BokmaalAndNynorsk" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect BokmaalAndNynorsk has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 1 § BokmaalAndNynorsk until a consensus is reached. 〜 Festucalex • talk 06:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Robert Stroud
Robert Stroud has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Norfolk, Virginia
Norfolk, Virginia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Portland Trail Blazers
Portland Trail Blazers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wings (1927 film)
Wings (1927 film) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)