Talk:José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:58, 17 July 2006 editHagiographer (talk \| contribs)182 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 07:12, 20 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,305,027 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: Iberia.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(283 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~talkheader~~}}		{{Talk header}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|blp=yes\|class=C\|vital=yes\|listas=Rodriguez Zapatero, Jose Luis\|1=
	*]
			{{WikiProject Biography\|politician-work-group=yes\|politician-priority=high}}
			{{WikiProject Spain\|importance=high}}
			{{WikiProject Politics\|importance=high}}
			{{WikiProject Socialism\|importance=low}}
			}}
			{{ITN talk\|17 April\|2004}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|maxarchivesize = 150K
			\|counter = 3
			\|minthreadsleft = 5
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\|algo = old(90d)
			\|archive = Talk:José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero/Archive %(counter)d
			}}

			== External links modified ==
	]
	I think the Jose Mena's sack was a secundary news in the local press and it should be moved to 6.3. Also, i will change catalonia autonomy reference for "he impulsed a new autonomous statute for Catalonia"

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	*]

			I have just added archive links to {{plural:4\|one external link\|4 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx\|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx\|nobots\|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
	{\| name="notice" class="messagebox" id="bizan standard-talk" style="background: #bee; border: 1px solid #666666; text-align: center; font-size: 100%;"
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051208224613/http://www.libertaddigital.com:83/php3/noticia.php3?fecha_edi_on=2004-08-26&num_edi_on=1436&cpn=1276231106&seccion=SOC_D to http://www.libertaddigital.com:83/php3/noticia.php3?fecha_edi_on=2004-08-26&num_edi_on=1436&cpn=1276231106&seccion=SOC_D
	\| \| '''Notice: ] and ] are banned from editing this article and all related articles for one year.'''
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090126150127/http://www.gallup-international.com:80/ContentFiles/survey.asp?id=10 to http://www.gallup-international.com/ContentFiles/survey.asp?id=10
	\|-
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110614062221/http://www.esquerra.org/nouestatut/videozp.php?s=2 to http://www.esquerra.org/nouestatut/videozp.php?s=2
	\| style="text-align: left; border-top: 1px solid #666666; " \| The users specified have edited this article inappropriately and have been banned by the ] from editing it for one year. The users are not prevented from discussing or proposing changes on this talk page. At the end of the ban, anyone may remove this notice.
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111002030447/http://www.barcelonareporter.com/index.php?/comments/erc_form_roadblock_on_path_to_catalan_statute_reform/ to http://www.barcelonareporter.com/index.php?/comments/erc_form_roadblock_on_path_to_catalan_statute_reform/
	<sub>Posted by ] 19:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC) for the arbitration committee. See ].</sub>
	\|}

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false}}
	==State of the articles==
	I notice someone deleted the José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero category. I am fine with the article as it is and also happy to see that all the sub articles are now redirects. I strongly support that they remain that way, ] 04:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

			Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">]:Online</sub></small> 13:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==
	==Sockpuppet==
	Lokks to me like Hagiographer is a Zapatancas sockpuppet. His edit summary ''Inserted links to articles redirected by user banned from editing the article. It seems he deletes them as part of his fight against other user.'' in poor Spanish attacking me is pure Zapatancas and of course I wasnt banned when I made the edits which were supported by every user other than strange Hagiographer. Bet he wants US spellings too? ] 13:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	==Update==
	I've updated the article. I've removed old information that doesn't look as important now as it did one year ago and that can be found in the sub-articles. I've found that in the article there were several mistakes, for example, the surname Armendáriz was written Armendáris. I believed that in the fight between SqueakBox and Zapatancas those mistakes were added on purpose as part of the conflict between them. So I've recovered a version previous to the edit war and I've added to it the scarce new information that have been posted here in the past two months. ] 07:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

			I have just added archive links to {{plural:6\|one external link\|6 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx\|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx\|nobots\|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
	You have been busy, Zapatancas, reverting the article to your version in defiance of the arbcom ban and using sockpupets. Nothing changes, eh? ] 12:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060522173920/http://www.elmundo.es:80/noticias/2000/7/23/espana/964312046.html to http://www.elmundo.es/noticias/2000/7/23/espana/964312046.html
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051205083359/http://www.libertaddigital.com:80/php3/noticia.php3?cpn=1275756079 to http://www.libertaddigital.com/php3/noticia.php3?cpn=1275756079
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070311012457/http://www.msnbc.msn.com:80/id/6733216/site/newsweek/ to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6733216/site/newsweek/
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060106091955/http://www.msnbc.msn.com:80/id/4571262/site/newsweek/ to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4571262/site/newsweek/
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110130165058/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/afp/20110128/bs_afp/spaineconomyunemployment_20110128120624 to http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110128/bs_afp/spaineconomyunemployment_20110128120624
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120705110658/http://www.elcomerciodelecuador.es/component/content/article/97-noticias-de-interes/5779-mariano-rajoy-asume-como-nuevo-presidente-del-gobierno-espanol.html to http://www.elcomerciodelecuador.es/component/content/article/97-noticias-de-interes/5779-mariano-rajoy-asume-como-nuevo-presidente-del-gobierno-espanol.html

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false}}
	=== The "Update" is really vandalism and should be reverted ===
	Although Hagiographer's comment above sounds reasonable, in fact the "edit" s/he has performed amounts to vandalism. Huge tranches of useful information have been removed and many smaller edits that had greatly improved the article have been eliminated, for example the well-considered changes by David Kernow and the genuine update, now restored, by Zape82 regarding the education system. Indeed, far from being an "update", as claimed, the article is now mutilated compared with the version as of 05:24, 10 July 2006. In my view the article should be reverted to that version, the bot edit of 00:33, 11 July should be restored, and if Hagiographer wants to make such drastic changes s/he should discuss them here first. ] 06:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">]:Online</sub></small> 06:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
	I fully support your view AdeMiami. I urge you to revert Hagiographer's edits, I would have done so myself but am banned from editing. That ban does not mean I dont get to have a point of view as a wikipdia editor, I think what Hagiographer has done has been a crying shame. If this continues I will take Hagiographer to Rfc or arbcom, ] 13:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==
	=== Explanation ===
	Excuse me, AdeMiami but I ask you not to use the term vandalism so easily. You must assume good faith first. I believe you have made that "mistake" also in good faith, but I think you are wrong. As far as I know, I have not removed any information. I have only removed that information that was already in the sub-articles and that refers to old events or that I think it does not belong here. For example, that thing about "Asesinato en Febrero", what is the use of having it here? It has nothing to do with Zapatero. If it has to be placed somewhere is in the articles about the March 11 attack. Please tell me what information I have removed that were so useful and all that. If necessary, I can accept I made a mistake. Regarding those edits by David Kernow, I have already recovered them - I believe. I don't find them so impressive but quite petty and unimportant but it is true there is not reason not to recover them.

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	Besides, it something amounts to "vandalism" is your request to go back to the edition of July 10, so the vandal here is you!!! :-) You are requesting to recover mistakes such as "Armendaris" instead of Armendariz, that is petty vandalism difficult to detect. SqueakBox, and probably, Zapatancas, added mistakes as part of his fight.

			I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	But of course, I believe that everything has been a misunderstanding. By the way, what this article really needs is not to keep that tons of old information that are already in the sub-articles but to include into it the most modern events that have taken place. So, probably, more information currently present will have to be reserved to the sub-articles.
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324062310/http://www.universia.es/portada/actualidad/noticia_actualidad.jsp?noticia=73446 to http://www.universia.es/portada/actualidad/noticia_actualidad.jsp?noticia=73446
			*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.barcelonareporter.com/index.php?%2Fcomments%2Ferc_form_roadblock_on_path_to_catalan_statute_reform%2F

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	AdeMiami, I recommend you not to become an instrument of SqueakBox, a user banned for insulting other users. So please, if you are interested about keeping information in the Misplaced Pages, what do you think about redirecting the sub-articles to the main article? SqueakBox insulted me first when I reverted his redirections, so it would be good if you could prove you are acting in good faith and not as a part of the campaign he started against me even before ever talking to me. SqueakBox really destroyed information and mutilated an article.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	By the way, I have changed the title of this section because I think that AdeMiami will recognize that the use of "vandalism" was inappropriate and it amounted to an insult, something forbidden in the Misplaced Pages ;-). ] 14:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 05:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
	Can you chill out Hagiographer. I agree witgh SqueakBox and Miami and think you should withdraw before you get blocked as a vandal. ] 15:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==
	Perhaps this is the better version. Are there other users out there with an opinion? Having looked at Hagiographer's edits today and the history between SqueakBox and zapatancas I am forced to include that Hagiographer and Zapatancas are indeed the same person, ] 16:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	The truth is that looking at your history and when you were created and when you have got so interested in this article, I cannot help thinking you are SqueakBox. It is difficult to believe for me you are acting in good faith as you have recovered an evident mistake I have talked about several times here. ] 16:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	I only know about this case because SqueakBox gave me a welcome message and when I replied his page came on my watchlist. When you started vandalissing it today I spotted that and, of course, reverted. Do you think Miami is also a Squeakbox sockpuppet. Perhaps you have a guilty conscience. No, I am not SqueakBox, I am not white, I am black and I am from Belize. It seems to me you are trying to prevent the consensus going against you with these sockpuppet claims, having looked at Squeak's latest edit I am inclined to believe him, no more. God bless your soul. ] 16:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040401174817/http://www.psoe.es/ambito/actualidad/home.do to http://www.psoe.es/ambito/actualidad/home.do

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	Excuse me, but how you can act in good faith and claim something so false that I have said Miami is a sock puppet? Why have you recovered the mistake? ] 16:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	hey I dont want to argue with you Hagiographer. I got involved because I saw you vandalising Squeak's user page. I dont want anything to do with your locuras on this page or arguing with squeak. Dont impose your ideas on me, okay? ] 16:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 11:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
	I don't understand why this article shold be the object of such controversy. No-one is disputing the factual information it contains (or contained) except for a few minor points, so surely it should be posssible to reach a consensus about how it is presented. However, there's no chance of consensus in this atmosphere of mutual accusation, so personally I'm going to take it off my watchlist and ignore it until the dust settles while I get on with something more constructive. ] 15:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

	== Mena ==

	I'm not sure that the sacking of Gen. Mena is correctly attributed to Zapatero. As I understand it, former Defence minister, José Bono was responsible for Mena's punishment and sacking. I get a funny feeling that this is not only incorrect but that it's being given too much significance.

	One source: http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_5328.shtml

	I'll leave the edit for now, and see if anyone agrees with me before I make the change. ]

	I agree, ] 00:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

	In Fact the disciplinary reponsability, repecting high ranking officers, in the Spanish Army is responsability of the Chief of Staff of the Army (Jefe de Esatdo Mayor de la Ejercito) or of The Chief of Staff of The Defense (JEMAD)
	--] 22:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

	== in general ==

	This entry is seriously lacking in citations. I have, today, performed a tidy-up, basically correcting language and grammar errors... but more needs to be done. There are specific areas (such as the education reform section) which need a complete re-write. ] 21:09, 15 July 2006 (CET)

	==Sub-Pages==

	Why has all the relevant info of this article been moved to various sub-pages? In my opinion it makes the article look like a skeleton, previously this was a full-fledged article.--] 19:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

	This is why I opposed having the sub articles in the first place, and this opposition is what led to the huge conflict with Zapatancas. Now Zapatancas has been banned from editing this article Hagiographer has taken his place to pursue this same strategy of the sub-articles which I for one oppose strongly. I believe all the sub articles should be turned back into redirects (which they were until Hagiographer decided to pursue Zapatancas path and reinstate them) with all the relevant information being put in this article, which is what we had before Hagiographer decided to single mindedly impose his and Zapatancas views on other users away, chasing away 2 other editors so far this week, ] 20:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

	:I concur, possibly a straw poll to find consensus is in order to settle this.--] 20:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

	Several comments:
	* I propose to ignore SqueakBox and his sock puppet ]. He is an absolute liar and he never talks about content, he only insults, preventing users like AdeMiami from editing the article or exposing their opinions. If the history page of any of the subarticles is examined it is found that they weren't redirected until some days before he was blocked when he already knew he was going to be blocked. I recovered them because I don't understand why a sub-article is redirected to the main article. It seems SqueakBox only argument is this is a war and he'll be the winner if the articles remain redirected.
	* In regard to the article, Jersey, if you believe the article is a skeleton is probably because it is a skeleton. The article would have been wonderful one year ago. Now it's completely outdated. I believe that's good if it looks incomplete because it's incomplete. It makes clear that it has to be updated.
	* What's that relevant information that's lacking? I only removed information that was old, nothing else.
	] 07:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:12, 20 October 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This

level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Spain High‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 17 April 2004.

Misplaced Pages

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040401174817/http://www.psoe.es/ambito/actualidad/home.do to http://www.psoe.es/ambito/actualidad/home.do

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories: