Misplaced Pages

Mistress (lover): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:36, 31 January 2015 editGiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,173 edits RV: Divorce did not become commonplace until the 20th century← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:56, 4 December 2024 edit undoRandy Kryn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users284,287 edits Description: added back 'long-term' (why not both!) 
(251 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Female who is in an extra-marital sexual relationship}}
{{Refimprove|date=December 2007}}
{{Redirect|Side piece|the Jack Harlow song|Come Home the Kids Miss You}}
{{for|the use of the term "mistress" in ]|Female dominance}}
{{Globalize|1=article|2=England|3=France|date=March 2020}}
], mistress of ], circa 1750.]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2021}}
], mistress of ], c. 1756]]


A '''mistress''' or '''kept woman''' is a woman who is in a relatively long-term sexual and romantic relationship with someone who is married to a different person.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Mistress definition and meaning {{!}} Collins English Dictionary|url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/mistress|access-date=20 August 2020|website=www.collinsdictionary.com|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=MISTRESS {{!}} definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/mistress|access-date=20 August 2020|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en-US}}</ref>
A '''mistress''' is a relatively long-term female ] and companion who is not ] to her partner, especially when her partner is married. Generally, the relationship is stable and at least semi-permanent, but the couple does not live together openly and the relationship is usually, but not always, secret. There is often also the implication (if not the fact) that the mistress is "kept"{{spndash}}i.e. that her lover is paying for some (and sometimes all) of her living expenses.<ref name="FreeDictionary">{{cite web |last=The Free Dictionary |title=Mistress |url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mistress |accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Love-Lessions |title=The Role of a Mistress: Is it as Glamorous as it Seems? |url=http://www.love-sessions.com/cheating.htm |accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref>


==Description==
The term "mistress" was originally used as a neutral counterpart to ].<ref name="FreeDictionary"/>


A mistress is usually in a long-term good relationship with a person who is married to someone else and is often referred to as "the other woman". Generally, the relationship is stable and at least semi-permanent, but the couple do not live together openly. The relationship is often, but not always, secret. There is often also the implication that the mistress is sometimes "kept"{{spndash}}i.e., her lover is paying all or some of her living expenses.<ref name="OED">{{cite web |title=Oxford English Dictionary On-line |url=https://www-oed-com.research.aadl.org/view/Entry/102971?rskey=uFRXBr&result=2&isAdvanced=false#eid |website=www.oed.com/view/Entry/102971?rskey=uFRXBr&result=2&isAdvanced=false |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=17 March 2023}}</ref>
== Definition ==
Historically the term has denoted a "kept woman", who was maintained in a comfortable (or even lavish) lifestyle by a wealthy man so that she will be available for his sexual pleasure. Such a woman could move between the roles of a mistress and a ] depending on her situation and environment. In modern times, however, the word "mistress" is used primarily to refer to the female lover of a man who is married to another woman; in the case of an unmarried man, it is usual to speak of a "]" or "]." Historically, a man "kept" a mistress. As the term implies, he was responsible for her debts and provided for her in much the same way as he did his wife, although not legally bound to do so. In more recent times, it is more likely that the mistress has a job of her own, and is less, if at all, financially dependent on the man.<ref>{{cite web|last=Blurt it|title=What Does Mistress Mean?|url=http://www.blurtit.com/q377478.html|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref>


Historically the term "mistress" denoted a "kept woman", who was maintained in a comfortable, or even lavish, lifestyle by a wealthy man so that she would be available for his sexual pleasure. Such a woman could move between the roles of a mistress and a ] depending on her situation and environment. Whereas the word "lover" was used when the illicit female partner was married to another man.
A mistress is not a ]: while a mistress, if "kept", may, in some sense, be exchanging sex for money, the principal difference is that a mistress has sex with fewer men and there is not so much of a direct '']'' between the money and the sex act. There is usually an emotional and possibly social relationship between a man and his mistress, whereas the relationship to a prostitute is predominantly sexual. It is also important that the "kept" status follows the establishment of a relationship of indefinite term as opposed to the agreement on price and terms established prior to any activity with a prostitute.<ref>{{cite web|last=Fulbright|first=Dr. Yvonne K.|title=FOXSexpert: Is Having a Sugar Daddy Kind of Like Being a Prostitute?|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,496844,00.html|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref>

In modern contexts, the word "mistress" is used primarily to refer to the female lover, married or unmarried, of a person who is married, without the kept woman aspects. In the case of an unmarried person, "mistress" is not usually used. Instead, when the woman is unmarried, it is common to speak of a "]" or a "]", and when the woman ''is'' married, she is called their "lover".

The term "mistress" was originally used as the neutral feminine counterpart to ]. In referring to those of higher social status, it meant the woman married to the owner, or renter, of the house, and was a term of deferential respect.<ref name="FreeDictionary">{{cite web|last=The Free Dictionary|title=Mistress|url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mistress|access-date=6 May 2012}}</ref>


== History == == History ==
]'s {{circa|1825}} painting ''] ]'']] ]'s {{circa|1825}} painting ''] ]'']]
], long-term mistress of Emperor ]]]
The historically best known and most-researched mistresses are the ]es of European ]s, for example, ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Derrick|first=Kiri|title=Top 10 Philandering English Monarchs|url=http://listverse.com/2011/04/21/top-10-philandering-english-monarchs/|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref> The keeping of a mistress in Europe was not confined to ] and ] but permeated down through the social ranks, essentially to any man who could afford to do so. Any man who could afford a mistress could have one (or more), regardless of social position. A wealthy ] or a young noble might have a kept woman. Being a mistress was typically an occupation for a younger woman who, if she were fortunate, might go on to marry her lover or another man of rank.<ref>{{cite web|last=Ives|first=Eric|title=Marrying for Love: The Experience of Edward IV and Henry VIII|url=http://www.historytoday.com/eric-ives/marrying-love-experience-edward-iv-and-henry-viii|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref> The historically best known and most-researched mistresses are the ]es of European ]s, for example, ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Derrick|first=Kiri|title=Top 10 Philandering English Monarchs|date=21 April 2011|url=http://listverse.com/2011/04/21/top-10-philandering-english-monarchs/|access-date=6 May 2012}}</ref> The keeping of a mistress in Europe was not confined to ] and ], but permeated down through the social ranks, essentially to any man who could afford to do so. Any man who could afford a mistress could have one (or more), regardless of social position. A wealthy ] or a young noble might have had a kept woman. Being a mistress was typically an occupation for a younger woman who, if she were fortunate, might go on to marry her lover or another man of rank.<ref>{{cite web|last=Ives|first=Eric|title=Marrying for Love: The Experience of Edward IV and Henry VIII|url=http://www.historytoday.com/eric-ives/marrying-love-experience-edward-iv-and-henry-viii|access-date=6 May 2012}}</ref>


The ballad "]" (published in 1611, but possibly older) extolls the loyal mistress of a slain ], who buries her dead lover and then dies of the exertion, as she was in an advanced stage of pregnancy. It is noteworthy that the ballad-maker assigned this role to the knight's mistress ("leman" was the term common at the time) rather than to his wife.<ref>{{cite web|last=Palermo|first=Martin|title=The Three Ravens|url=https://nuoodle.norwich.edu/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=12333|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Housman|first=John E.|title=British Popular Ballads|year=1952|publisher=Ayer Publishing|pages=105–106}}</ref> The ballad "]" (published in 1611, but possibly older) extolls the loyal mistress of a slain ], who buries her dead lover and then dies of the exertion, as she was in an advanced stage of pregnancy. The ballad-maker assigned this role to the knight's mistress ("leman" was the term common at the time) rather than to his wife.<ref>{{cite web|last=Palermo|first=Martin|title=The Three Ravens|url=https://nuoodle.norwich.edu/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=12333|access-date=6 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Housman|first=John E.|title=British Popular Ballads|year=1952|publisher=Ayer Publishing|pages=105–106}}</ref>


In the ] of Europe, particularly ] and ] in the 17th and 18th centuries, a mistress often wielded great power and influence. A king might have numerous mistresses but have a single "favourite mistress" or "official mistress" (in French, "maîtresse en titre"), as with ] and ]. The mistresses of both ] (especially ]) and ] were often considered to exert great influence over their lovers, the relationships being ]s.<ref>{{cite book|last=Herman|first=Eleanor|title=Sex with Kings: 500 Years of Adultery, Power, Rivalry and Revenge|year=2005|publisher=HarperCollins|pages=9}}</ref> Other than wealthy merchants and kings, ] is but one example of a ] who kept mistresses. <ref>{{cite web|last=NNDB|title=Pope Alexander VI|url=http://www.nndb.com/people/159/000092880/|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref> While the extremely wealthy might keep a mistress for life (as ] did with "]", even after they were no longer romantically linked), such was not the case for most kept women.<ref>{{cite book|last=Pope|first=Alexander|title=The works: including several hundred unpublished letters, and other new materials, Volume 7|year=1871|publisher=Murray|pages=106}}</ref> In the ] of Europe, particularly ] and ] in the 17th and 18th centuries, a mistress often wielded great power and influence. A king might have numerous mistresses but have a single "favourite mistress" or "official mistress" (in French, '']''), as with ] and ]. The mistresses of both Louis XV (especially Madame de Pompadour) and ] were often considered to exert great influence over their lovers, the relationships being ]s.<ref>{{cite book|last=Herman|first=Eleanor|title=Sex with Kings: 500 Years of Adultery, Power, Rivalry and Revenge|year=2005|publisher=HarperCollins|page=9}}</ref> Other than wealthy merchants and kings, ] is but one example of a ] who kept mistresses.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Williams|first=George L.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-mq7ctwMNdoC&q=%22Alexander+VI%22+%22mistress%22&pg=PA76|title=Papal Genealogy: The Families and Descendants of the Popes|date=11 August 2004|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-0-7864-2071-1|pages=76|language=en}}</ref> While the extremely wealthy might keep a mistress for life (as ] did with "]", even after they were no longer romantically linked), such was not the case for most kept women.<ref>{{cite book|last=Pope|first=Alexander|title=The works: including several hundred unpublished letters, and other new materials, Volume 7|year=1871|publisher=Murray|page=106}}</ref>


In 1736, when George II was newly ascendant, ] (in '']'') has his Lord Place say, "…but, miss, every one now keeps and is kept; there are no such things as marriages now-a-days, unless merely Smithfield contracts, and that for the support of families; but then the husband and wife both take into keeping within a fortnight."<ref>{{cite book|last=Fielding|first=Henry|title=The works of Henry Fielding, with a life of the author, Volume 3|year=1824|publisher=Richards and Co|pages=302}}</ref> In 1736, when George II was newly ascendant, ] (in '']'') has his Lord Place say, " but, miss, every one now keeps and is kept; there are no such things as marriages now-a-days, unless merely Smithfield contracts, and that for the support of families; but then the husband and wife both take into keeping within a fortnight".<ref>{{cite book|last=Fielding|first=Henry|title=The works of Henry Fielding, with a life of the author, Volume 3|year=1824|publisher=Richards and Co|page=302}}</ref>


Occasionally the mistress is in a superior position both financially and socially to her lover. As a widow, ] was known to have been involved with several successive men during her reign; but, like many powerful women of her era, in spite of being a widow free to marry, she chose not to share her power with a husband, preferring to maintain absolute power alone.<ref>{{cite web|last=Johnson Lewis|first=Jone|title=Catherine the Great|url=http://womenshistory.about.com/od/catherinegreat/p/catherinegreat.htm|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref> Occasionally the mistress is in a superior position both financially and socially to her lover. As a widow, ] was known to have been involved with several successive men during her reign; but, like many powerful women of her era, in spite of being a widow free to marry, she chose not to share her power with a husband, preferring to maintain absolute power alone.<ref>{{cite web|last=Johnson Lewis|first=Jone|title=Catherine the Great|url=http://womenshistory.about.com/od/catherinegreat/p/catherinegreat.htm|access-date=6 May 2012}}</ref>


In literature, ]'s work '']'' portrays a situation where a woman becomes the mistress of her husband's ].<ref>{{cite web|last=The Literature Network|title=Lady Chatterley's Lover|url=http://www.online-literature.com/dh_lawrence/lady_chatterley_lover/|accessdate=6 May 2012}}</ref> Until recently, a woman's taking a socially inferior lover was considered much more shocking than the reverse situation. In literature, ]'s 1928 novel '']'' portrays a situation where a woman becomes the mistress of her husband's ].<ref>{{cite web|last=The Literature Network|title=Lady Chatterley's Lover|url=http://www.online-literature.com/dh_lawrence/lady_chatterley_lover/|access-date=6 May 2012}}</ref> Until recently, a woman's taking a socially inferior lover was considered much more shocking than the reverse situation.


=== 20th century === === 20th century ===
During the 20th century, as many women became better educated and more able to support themselves, fewer women found satisfaction in the position of being a mistress and were more likely to be in relationships with unmarried men. As divorce became more socially acceptable, it was easier for men to divorce their wives and marry the women who, in earlier eras, might have been their mistresses. The practice of having a mistress continued among some married men, especially the wealthy. Occasionally, men married their mistresses. The late Sir ], on marrying his mistress, Lady ], declared, "When you marry your mistress, you create a job vacancy."<ref>Rees, Nigel (ed.) ''Cassell Companion to Quotations'' (1997) ISBN 0-304-34848-1 There is some dispute about the exact wording. has it as "When a man marries his mistress it creates a job opportunity." As ] became more socially acceptable, it was easier for men to divorce their wives and marry the women who, in earlier years, might have been their mistresses. The practice of having a mistress continued among some married men, especially the wealthy. Occasionally, men married their mistresses. The late Sir ], on marrying his mistress, Lady ], declared, "When you marry your mistress, you create a job vacancy".<ref>Rees, Nigel (ed.) ''Cassell Companion to Quotations'' (1997) {{ISBN|0-304-34848-1}}. There is some dispute about the exact wording. {{dead link|date=April 2017|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}} has it as: "When a man marries his mistress it creates a job opportunity".
in the ''National Review'' (1 September 1997) says this:<blockquote>Women adored him and he adored women. He married three times and had numerous mistresses. (Yet another Jimmyism: 'When you marry your mistress you create a job vacancy.') He was loyal, in his own way, to all of them, and all of them were loyal to him. He had eight children by four different women, and never have I seen a more closely knit family.</blockquote></ref> in the ''National Review'' (1 September 1997) says this:<blockquote>Women adored him and he adored women. He married three times and had numerous mistresses. (Yet another Jimmyism: 'When you marry your mistress you create a job vacancy.') He was loyal, in his own way, to all of them, and all of them were loyal to him. He had eight children by four different women, and never have I seen a more closely knit family.</blockquote></ref>

== Male equivalent ==

For male mistress, the more general term "lover" can be used, but it does not carry the same implications. "]" is sometimes used, but this term can apply to either partner in an illicit relationship, so it is not exclusively male. If the man is being financially supported, especially by a wealthy older woman or man, he is a ].

In 18th and 19th-century ], the terms '']'' and ''cavalier servente'' were used to describe a man who was the professed gallant and lover of a married woman. Another word that has been used for a male mistress is '']'', though this carries connotations of brief duration and expectation of payment, i.e., ].


== In literature == == In literature ==
]'s ''],'' plate 2, from 1731 showing Moll Hackabout as a mistress.]] ]'s ''],'' plate 2, from 1731 showing Moll Hackabout as a mistress]]
In both ]'s '']'' and ]'s'' ]'', as well as in countless novels of feminine peril, the distinction between a "kept woman" and a prostitute is all-important.<ref>{{cite book|last=Cleland|first=John|title=Fanny Hill: Or, Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure|year=1986|publisher=Penguin Classics|isbn=0-14-043249-3}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=BookRags|title=Moll Flanders {{!}} Research & Encyclopedia Articles|url=http://www.bookrags.com/research/moll-flanders-wlait/sect2.html|accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref> In both ]'s 1748 novel '']'' and ]'s 1722 '']'', as well as in countless novels of feminine peril, the distinction between a "kept woman" and a prostitute is all-important.<ref>{{cite book|last=Cleland|first=John|title=Fanny Hill: Or, Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure|year=1986|publisher=Penguin Classics|isbn=0-14-043249-3}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=BookRags|title=Moll Flanders {{!}} Research & Encyclopedia Articles|url=http://www.bookrags.com/research/moll-flanders-wlait/sect2.html|access-date=7 May 2012}}</ref>


Apologists for the practice of mistresses referred to the practice in the ancient ] of keeping a ]; they frequently quoted verses from the ] to show that mistress-keeping was an ancient practice that was, if not acceptable, at least understandable.<ref>{{cite book|last=Baker|first=D.L.|title=Tight Fists Or Open Hands?: Wealth and Poverty in Old Testament Law|year=2009|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|isbn=<!--0-8028-6283-7, -->9780802862839|pages=151–160}}</ref> ], in ''],'' suggested that the king's keeping of mistresses and production of ]s was a result of his abundance of generosity and spirit.<ref>{{cite web|last=Dryden|first=John|title=Annus Mirabilis|url=http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/d/dryden/john/annus_mirabilis/poem.html|accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref> In its more sinister form, the theme of being "kept" is never far from the surface in novels about women as victims in the 18th century in ], whether in the novels of ] or ] (whose heroines in '']'' and '']'' are both put in a position of being threatened with sexual degradation and being reduced to the status of a kept object).<ref>{{cite book|last=Richardson|first=Samuel|title=A collection of the moral and instructive A collection of the moral and instructive sentiments, maxims, cautions, and reflexions, contained in the histories of Pamela, Clarissa, and Sir Charles Grandison|year=1755|publisher=Printed for S. Richardson; and sold by C. Hitch and L. Hawes}}</ref> Defenders of the practice of mistresses referred to the practice in the ancient ] of keeping a ]; they frequently quoted verses from the ] to show that mistress-keeping was an ancient practice that was, if not acceptable, at least understandable.<ref>{{cite book|last=Baker|first=D.L.|title=Tight Fists Or Open Hands?: Wealth and Poverty in Old Testament Law|year=2009|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing|isbn= 9780802862839|pages=151–160}}</ref> ], in '']'', suggested that the king's keeping of mistresses and production of ]s was a result of his abundance of generosity and spirit.<ref>{{cite web|last=Dryden|first=John|title=Annus Mirabilis|url=https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/d/dryden/john/annus_mirabilis/poem.html|access-date=7 May 2012|archive-date=10 April 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120410180802/http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/d/dryden/john/annus_mirabilis/poem.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> In its more sinister form, the theme of being "kept" is never far from the surface in novels about women as victims in the 18th century in ], whether in the novels of ] or ] (whose heroines in '']'' and '']'' are both put in a position of being threatened with sexual degradation and being reduced to the status of a kept object).<ref>{{cite book|last=Richardson|first=Samuel|title=A collection of the moral and instructive A collection of the moral and instructive sentiments, maxims, cautions, and reflexions, contained in the histories of Pamela, Clarissa, and Sir Charles Grandison|year=1755|publisher=Printed for S. Richardson; and sold by C. Hitch and L. Hawes}}</ref>


With the ] of the early 19th century, the subject of "keeping" becomes more problematic, in that a non-marital sexual union can occasionally be celebrated as a woman's free choice and a noble alternative. Maryann Evans (better known as ]) defiantly lived "in sin" with a married man, partially as a sign of her independence of middle-class morality. Her independence required that she not be "kept."<ref>{{cite web|last=Hughes|first=Annika M.|title=Mary Ann Evans and George Eliot: One Woman|url=http://www.womeninworldhistory.com/imow-Eliot.pdf|accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Liukkonen|first=Petri|title=George Eliot (1819-1880) - pseudonym for Mary Ann Cross, also Marian Evans, original surname Evans|url=http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/gelliot.htm|accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref> With the ] of the early 19th century, the subject of "keeping" becomes more problematic, in that a non-marital sexual union can occasionally be celebrated as a woman's free choice and a noble alternative. Mary Ann Evans (better known as ]) defiantly lived "in sin" with a married man, partially as a sign of her independence of middle-class morality. Her independence required that she not be "kept".<ref>{{cite web|last=Hughes|first=Annika M.|title=Mary Ann Evans and George Eliot: One Woman|url=http://www.womeninworldhistory.com/imow-Eliot.pdf|access-date=7 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/gelliot.htm |title=George Eliot |website=Books and Writers (kirjasto.sci.fi) |first=Petri |last=Liukkonen |publisher=] Public Library |location=Finland |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120313204116/http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/gelliot.htm |archive-date=13 March 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

]'s novel '']'' (1848) presents impassioned arguments on both sides of this question, as Rochester, unable to be free of his insane wife, tries to persuade Jane Eyre to live with him, which she resists.<ref>{{cite web|last=The Great Books Foundation|title=Jane Eyre|url=http://www.greatbooks.org/resources/guides/novels/jane-eyre/|accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref>

]'s novel '']'' (1936) also implies that ] should be the mistress of Rhett Butler, which was thought of as prostitution by Scarlett as she said she would be no better than Belle Watling.


== See also == == See also ==
{{Portal|Sex}}
* ]
* ] * ]
* '']''
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{reflist}}


== References == == References ==
=== Citations ===
*{{cite book
{{Reflist}}
| last = Cronin

| first = Vincent
=== Sources ===
| year = 1974
; Books
| title = Louis and Antoinette
* {{cite book|last=Cronin|first=Vincent|year=1974|title=Louis and Antoinette |publisher=]|location=London|isbn=0-00-211494-1}}
| publisher = HarperCollins Publishers Limitedn
* {{cite book|last=Mitford|first=Nancy|year=1954|title=Madame de Pompadour|publisher=]|location=London}}
| location = London
| ISBN = 0-00-211494-1
}}


== Further reading ==
*{{cite book
* {{cite news|title=History of a Deeply Complex Word: The Many Meanings of 'Mistress'|url=https://www.npr.org/2015/08/22/433834943/history-of-a-deeply-complex-word-the-many-meanings-of-mistress|date=22 August 2015|work=]|publisher=]|access-date=23 August 2015}}
| last = Mitford
* {{cite book|last=Sova|first=Dawn B.|year=2001|orig-year=1993|title=The Encyclopedia of Mistresses|location=London|publisher=]|isbn=1-86105-387-8|oclc=46503143}}
| first = Nancy
| year = 1954
| title = Madame de Pompadour
| publisher = Hamish Hamilton Ltd
| location = London
| ISBN =
}}


{{Navbox close relationships}} {{Interpersonal relationships footer}}
{{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 16:56, 4 December 2024

Female who is in an extra-marital sexual relationship "Side piece" redirects here. For the Jack Harlow song, see Come Home the Kids Miss You.
Globe icon.The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with England and France and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (March 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Madame de Pompadour, mistress of Louis XV of France, c. 1756

A mistress or kept woman is a woman who is in a relatively long-term sexual and romantic relationship with someone who is married to a different person.

Description

A mistress is usually in a long-term good relationship with a person who is married to someone else and is often referred to as "the other woman". Generally, the relationship is stable and at least semi-permanent, but the couple do not live together openly. The relationship is often, but not always, secret. There is often also the implication that the mistress is sometimes "kept" – i.e., her lover is paying all or some of her living expenses.

Historically the term "mistress" denoted a "kept woman", who was maintained in a comfortable, or even lavish, lifestyle by a wealthy man so that she would be available for his sexual pleasure. Such a woman could move between the roles of a mistress and a courtesan depending on her situation and environment. Whereas the word "lover" was used when the illicit female partner was married to another man.

In modern contexts, the word "mistress" is used primarily to refer to the female lover, married or unmarried, of a person who is married, without the kept woman aspects. In the case of an unmarried person, "mistress" is not usually used. Instead, when the woman is unmarried, it is common to speak of a "girlfriend" or a "partner", and when the woman is married, she is called their "lover".

The term "mistress" was originally used as the neutral feminine counterpart to "mister" or "master". In referring to those of higher social status, it meant the woman married to the owner, or renter, of the house, and was a term of deferential respect.

History

Eugène Delacroix's c. 1825 painting Louis d'Orléans Showing His Mistress
Domitila de Castro, long-term mistress of Emperor Pedro I of Brazil

The historically best known and most-researched mistresses are the royal mistresses of European monarchs, for example, Agnès Sorel, Diane de Poitiers, Barbara Villiers, Nell Gwyn, Madame de Montespan and Madame de Pompadour. The keeping of a mistress in Europe was not confined to royalty and nobility, but permeated down through the social ranks, essentially to any man who could afford to do so. Any man who could afford a mistress could have one (or more), regardless of social position. A wealthy merchant or a young noble might have had a kept woman. Being a mistress was typically an occupation for a younger woman who, if she were fortunate, might go on to marry her lover or another man of rank.

The ballad "The Three Ravens" (published in 1611, but possibly older) extolls the loyal mistress of a slain knight, who buries her dead lover and then dies of the exertion, as she was in an advanced stage of pregnancy. The ballad-maker assigned this role to the knight's mistress ("leman" was the term common at the time) rather than to his wife.

In the courts of Europe, particularly Versailles and Whitehall in the 17th and 18th centuries, a mistress often wielded great power and influence. A king might have numerous mistresses but have a single "favourite mistress" or "official mistress" (in French, maîtresse-en-titre), as with Louis XV and Madame de Pompadour. The mistresses of both Louis XV (especially Madame de Pompadour) and Charles II were often considered to exert great influence over their lovers, the relationships being open secrets. Other than wealthy merchants and kings, Alexander VI is but one example of a Pope who kept mistresses. While the extremely wealthy might keep a mistress for life (as George II of Great Britain did with "Mrs Howard", even after they were no longer romantically linked), such was not the case for most kept women.

In 1736, when George II was newly ascendant, Henry Fielding (in Pasquin) has his Lord Place say, " but, miss, every one now keeps and is kept; there are no such things as marriages now-a-days, unless merely Smithfield contracts, and that for the support of families; but then the husband and wife both take into keeping within a fortnight".

Occasionally the mistress is in a superior position both financially and socially to her lover. As a widow, Catherine the Great was known to have been involved with several successive men during her reign; but, like many powerful women of her era, in spite of being a widow free to marry, she chose not to share her power with a husband, preferring to maintain absolute power alone.

In literature, D. H. Lawrence's 1928 novel Lady Chatterley's Lover portrays a situation where a woman becomes the mistress of her husband's gamekeeper. Until recently, a woman's taking a socially inferior lover was considered much more shocking than the reverse situation.

20th century

As divorce became more socially acceptable, it was easier for men to divorce their wives and marry the women who, in earlier years, might have been their mistresses. The practice of having a mistress continued among some married men, especially the wealthy. Occasionally, men married their mistresses. The late Sir James Goldsmith, on marrying his mistress, Lady Annabel Birley, declared, "When you marry your mistress, you create a job vacancy".

In literature

William Hogarth's A Harlot's Progress, plate 2, from 1731 showing Moll Hackabout as a mistress

In both John Cleland's 1748 novel Fanny Hill and Daniel Defoe's 1722 Moll Flanders, as well as in countless novels of feminine peril, the distinction between a "kept woman" and a prostitute is all-important.

Defenders of the practice of mistresses referred to the practice in the ancient Near East of keeping a concubine; they frequently quoted verses from the Old Testament to show that mistress-keeping was an ancient practice that was, if not acceptable, at least understandable. John Dryden, in Annus Mirabilis, suggested that the king's keeping of mistresses and production of bastards was a result of his abundance of generosity and spirit. In its more sinister form, the theme of being "kept" is never far from the surface in novels about women as victims in the 18th century in England, whether in the novels of Eliza Haywood or Samuel Richardson (whose heroines in Pamela and Clarissa are both put in a position of being threatened with sexual degradation and being reduced to the status of a kept object).

With the Romantics of the early 19th century, the subject of "keeping" becomes more problematic, in that a non-marital sexual union can occasionally be celebrated as a woman's free choice and a noble alternative. Mary Ann Evans (better known as George Eliot) defiantly lived "in sin" with a married man, partially as a sign of her independence of middle-class morality. Her independence required that she not be "kept".

See also

References

Citations

  1. "Mistress definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary". www.collinsdictionary.com. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
  2. "MISTRESS | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary". dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
  3. "Oxford English Dictionary On-line". www.oed.com/view/Entry/102971?rskey=uFRXBr&result=2&isAdvanced=false. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  4. The Free Dictionary. "Mistress". Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  5. Derrick, Kiri (21 April 2011). "Top 10 Philandering English Monarchs". Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  6. Ives, Eric. "Marrying for Love: The Experience of Edward IV and Henry VIII". Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  7. Palermo, Martin. "The Three Ravens". Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  8. Housman, John E. (1952). British Popular Ballads. Ayer Publishing. pp. 105–106.
  9. Herman, Eleanor (2005). Sex with Kings: 500 Years of Adultery, Power, Rivalry and Revenge. HarperCollins. p. 9.
  10. Williams, George L. (11 August 2004). Papal Genealogy: The Families and Descendants of the Popes. McFarland. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-7864-2071-1.
  11. Pope, Alexander (1871). The works: including several hundred unpublished letters, and other new materials, Volume 7. Murray. p. 106.
  12. Fielding, Henry (1824). The works of Henry Fielding, with a life of the author, Volume 3. Richards and Co. p. 302.
  13. Johnson Lewis, Jone. "Catherine the Great". Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  14. The Literature Network. "Lady Chatterley's Lover". Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  15. Rees, Nigel (ed.) Cassell Companion to Quotations (1997) ISBN 0-304-34848-1. There is some dispute about the exact wording. man is not allowed to marry his mistress_5100 Quotesmith has it as: "When a man marries his mistress it creates a job opportunity". John Simon's obituary of Goldsmith in the National Review (1 September 1997) says this:

    Women adored him and he adored women. He married three times and had numerous mistresses. (Yet another Jimmyism: 'When you marry your mistress you create a job vacancy.') He was loyal, in his own way, to all of them, and all of them were loyal to him. He had eight children by four different women, and never have I seen a more closely knit family.

  16. Cleland, John (1986). Fanny Hill: Or, Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure. Penguin Classics. ISBN 0-14-043249-3.
  17. BookRags. Moll Flanders | Research & Encyclopedia Articles. Retrieved 7 May 2012.
  18. Baker, D.L. (2009). Tight Fists Or Open Hands?: Wealth and Poverty in Old Testament Law. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 151–160. ISBN 9780802862839.
  19. Dryden, John. "Annus Mirabilis". Archived from the original on 10 April 2012. Retrieved 7 May 2012.
  20. Richardson, Samuel (1755). A collection of the moral and instructive A collection of the moral and instructive sentiments, maxims, cautions, and reflexions, contained in the histories of Pamela, Clarissa, and Sir Charles Grandison. Printed for S. Richardson; and sold by C. Hitch and L. Hawes.
  21. Hughes, Annika M. "Mary Ann Evans and George Eliot: One Woman" (PDF). Retrieved 7 May 2012.
  22. Liukkonen, Petri. "George Eliot". Books and Writers (kirjasto.sci.fi). Finland: Kuusankoski Public Library. Archived from the original on 13 March 2012.

Sources

Books

Further reading

Interpersonal relationships
Types
Romantic
Non-monogamy
Casual sex
Non-romantic
Historical
Events
Emotions
Practices
Abuse
See also
Categories: