| Revision as of 07:40, 19 July 2006 editYellowMonkey (talk | contribs)86,443 edits reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:16, 28 January 2009 edit undoJac16888 (talk | contribs)Administrators55,274 editsm moved User talk:Oiboy77 archive1 to User talk:Oiboy77/archive1: move to proper place | ||
| (149 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == why no personal life? == | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="75" | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|] | |||
| ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center"|] | |||
| |} | |||
| ] also has personal life.--] (]) 17:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| People are equal. Jin Jing has her own right to get an article on her in wikipedia, just as Lance Armstrong does. Firstly we should add the sentence that she is single.--] (]) 17:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{blatantvandal}} ] (] | ]) 07:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :It's you who are edit warring and reverting peoples work without any thought. Please read Misplaced Pages's policy of 3 Reverts. | |||
| == why not guarding? == | |||
| why is guarding pov?--] (]) 18:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :What do you mean bogus tags?? | |||
| Guarding refers to protecting. She is an athlete and a torchbearer not a protector of the torch. | |||
| Well, where is the vandalism? ''']''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> ] 07:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| We can go to the talk page.--] (]) 18:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == why were you banned so many times before? == | |||
| why?--] (]) 18:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Please do not undo. == | |||
| Please do not undo. Your sentence is wrong. They are pro-tibetan, not as you said.--] (]) 18:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == your record == | |||
| 09:13, 18 October 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 31 hours (You were repeatedly warned and still chose to continue vandalism) | |||
| 11:53, 24 August 2006 PinchasC (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 56 hours (3rr on Human rights in Israel) | |||
| 02:00, 16 August 2006 Blnguyen (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (fake signatures on Talk:Israel) | |||
| 21:42, 7 August 2006 Stifle (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation at Human rights in Israel) | |||
| 20:48, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) unblocked Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs) (Archived, not deleted) | |||
| 17:52, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 hours (Removed userpage warnings after fourth-level notice) | |||
| 12:07, 8 July 2006 KillerChihuahua (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (vandalism) | |||
| 09:05, 29 June 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (repeated vandalism is this user's only contribution, even after numerous warnings) | |||
| --] (]) 18:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please be aware my userpage is not a soapbox for you to vandalize. | |||
| I just show you what you did before.--] (]) 18:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Protection template== | |||
| Hi, Oiboy. Long time no speak. In general you should not put protection templates on unprotected pages. Is there a reason why you would want your talk page protected? -- ] (]) 19:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Jin Jang and user talk page== | |||
| Please ] in the actions of other editors. Threatening to protect pages is inappropriate behaviour; especially when A) you don't have the admin privileges to do so and B) admins caught in an edit war don't protect pages simply to support/exclude a particular POV. Please show more restraint and thought in your future edits. Likewise with your talk page; other I looked through the history and other editors were not using as a sopabox. --] (]) 17:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Jin Jing == | |||
| You will also note that your mass-reversion removed about a dozen minor improvements which Jingandteller was trying to add to the article. I see no such consensus on the talk page. Details on her personal history that are public are welcome to the article, in my opinion, because they are far less controversial than the torch relay. | |||
| Your edit removed a substantial amount of personal history, as well as removing the improvements made to nearly all the references. The only section you appear to disagree with is the "2008 Summer Olympics torch relay" section. Mass revisions help no-one, and lead to edit wars. I suggest you work more carefully with the new material, rather than simply denouncing it as products of the "CCP propogandists". ] <sup>]</sup> 16:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:16, 28 January 2009
why no personal life?
Lance Armstrong also has personal life.--Jingandteller (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
People are equal. Jin Jing has her own right to get an article on her in wikipedia, just as Lance Armstrong does. Firstly we should add the sentence that she is single.--Jingandteller (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
why not guarding?
why is guarding pov?--Jingandteller (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Guarding refers to protecting. She is an athlete and a torchbearer not a protector of the torch.
We can go to the talk page.--Jingandteller (talk) 18:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
why were you banned so many times before?
why?--Jingandteller (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not undo.
Please do not undo. Your sentence is wrong. They are pro-tibetan, not as you said.--Jingandteller (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
your record
09:13, 18 October 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 31 hours (You were repeatedly warned and still chose to continue vandalism) 11:53, 24 August 2006 PinchasC (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 56 hours (3rr on Human rights in Israel) 02:00, 16 August 2006 Blnguyen (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (fake signatures on Talk:Israel) 21:42, 7 August 2006 Stifle (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation at Human rights in Israel) 20:48, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) unblocked Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs) (Archived, not deleted) 17:52, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 hours (Removed userpage warnings after fourth-level notice) 12:07, 8 July 2006 KillerChihuahua (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (vandalism) 09:05, 29 June 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (repeated vandalism is this user's only contribution, even after numerous warnings)
--Jingandteller (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please be aware my userpage is not a soapbox for you to vandalize.
I just show you what you did before.--Jingandteller (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Protection template
Hi, Oiboy. Long time no speak. In general you should not put protection templates on unprotected pages. Is there a reason why you would want your talk page protected? -- Avi (talk) 19:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Jin Jang and user talk page
Please assume good faith in the actions of other editors. Threatening to protect pages is inappropriate behaviour; especially when A) you don't have the admin privileges to do so and B) admins caught in an edit war don't protect pages simply to support/exclude a particular POV. Please show more restraint and thought in your future edits. Likewise with your talk page; other I looked through the history and other editors were not using as a sopabox. --Madchester (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Jin Jing
You will also note that your mass-reversion removed about a dozen minor improvements which Jingandteller was trying to add to the article. I see no such consensus on the talk page. Details on her personal history that are public are welcome to the article, in my opinion, because they are far less controversial than the torch relay.
Your edit removed a substantial amount of personal history, as well as removing the improvements made to nearly all the references. The only section you appear to disagree with is the "2008 Summer Olympics torch relay" section. Mass revisions help no-one, and lead to edit wars. I suggest you work more carefully with the new material, rather than simply denouncing it as products of the "CCP propogandists". nneonneo 16:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)