| Revision as of 21:54, 15 February 2015 editSchroCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,894 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:42, 12 September 2024 edit undoJb 007clone (talk | contribs)297 edits ←Blanked the pageTags: Blanking Manual revert | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == The Kingsman == | |||
| '''Update:''' Damn, it feels so good to be vindicated :) ] (]) 17:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :*PMSL - not even close. - ] (]) 21:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| A friendly warning that you have reached your 3 revert limit for The Kingsman article. Please maintain the discussion on the talk page instead of continuing the edit war. If the consensus is to add the gag, then it can be added back to the article. It won't hurt the page with it gone for the time being. ] ] 19:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Do I have a choice otherwise? ] (]) 19:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :You have multiple choices. You've initially chosen to engage in an edit war (as did the other editor, and I warned them as well). You can choose to stay on the talk page, with the page reverted back to its original state, until a consensus is arrived at. Or, you could choose to engage in the edit war some more, and risk being blocked. I hope it's the former and not the latter though. As the latter means you cannot continue to discuss your reasoning for including the gag in the article until the block is up. ] ] 19:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::So the choice is talk page or blocked? Doesn't seem like much of a 'choice', does it? Don't worry, I won't revert the page anymore. ] (]) 19:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC) | |||