Misplaced Pages

Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:22, 19 July 2006 edit192.117.103.90 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:30, 16 December 2024 edit undoHmarcuse (talk | contribs)467 edits Germany: fixed two referencesTag: Visual edit 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] -->
----
{{See also|Jehovah's Witnesses and governments|Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses by country}}
{{Unreferenced}}
{{Jehovah's Witnesses}} {{Jehovah's Witnesses|expanded=opposition}}{{Status of religious freedom|expanded=persecution}}
{{Discrimination sidebar|expand-religious=yes}}
Throughout the history of '''],''' their history, their beliefs, doctrines and practices have met controversy and opposition from the local governments, communities, or religious groups. Many Christian denominations consider their interpretation and doctrines to be ]. Thus some religious leaders, have accused Jehovah's Witnesses of being a "]". Although the term "]" is problematic and generally carries strong negative connotations, conveying disdain and prejudice without having any valuable, substantive content, many persist in using it to label groups such as Jehovah's Witnesses, perhaps for these very reasons but some end up not acquiring valid evidences to back up this ideology.
Political and religious animosity against them has at times led to ] and ] oppression, including the targeting of Jehovah's Witnesses in the Holocaust.


] and ] of ] have ] throughout ]. Consequently, the denomination has been opposed by local governments, communities, and religious groups. Many ]s consider the interpretations and doctrines of Jehovah's Witnesses ], and some professors of ] have classified the denomination as a ].<ref>{{Citation|last=Hoekema|first=Anthony A.|author-link=Anthony A. Hoekema|title=The Four Major Cults|publisher=William B. Eerdmans|year=1963|location=Grand Rapids, Michigan|pages=1–8, 223–371, 373–388|isbn=0-8028-3117-6}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Rhodes|first=Ron|title=The Challenge of the Cults and New Religions|publisher=Zondervan|year=2001|location=Grand Rapids, Michigan|pages=|isbn=0-310-23217-1|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780310232179/page/77}}</ref>
On the milder side, there have been opposition by locals to the building of facilities (such as Kingdom Halls), and the holding of large conventions. In those circumstances, at times the reason is opposition to the religion, but at other times, they are more mundane, such as concerns about traffic congestion and noise.


According to ] professor ], Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States were "the principal victims of ] … they began to attract attention and provoke repression in the 1930s, when their proselytizing and numbers rapidly increased."<ref>{{cite book|last=Cox|first=Archibald|title=The Court and the Constitution|url=https://archive.org/details/courtconstit00coxa|url-access=registration|location=Boston, MA|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Co.|year=1987|page=|isbn=0-395-48071-X}}</ref> At times, political and religious animosity against Jehovah's Witnesses has led to ] and ]al repression in various countries including the ], ] and ].
== Mob violence in the USA ==
Strong resentment and anger were sometimes directed at the group (then called Bible Students) in the 1910s and 1920s. At the time, this was largely due to the Watch Tower Society's outspoken manner; members carrying placards outside many churches and in the streets proclaiming the imminent destruction of church members, along with both church and government institutions if they did not flee from "false religion" was not an uncommon sight. Typical examples of the Watchtower's attitude are found in the Watch Tower Society's book publication ''The Finished Mystery'' (SS-7), 1917 edition: "Also, in the year 1918, when God destroys the churches wholesale and the church members by millions, it shall be that any that escape shall come to the works of Pastor Russell to learn the meaning of the downfall of 'Christianity.'" () "The people who are the strength of Christendom shall be cut off in the brief but terribly eventful period beginning in 1918 A.D. A third part are 'burned with fire in the midst of the city.' Fire symbolizes destruction. . . .After 1918 the people supporting churchianity will cease to be its supporters, be destroyed as adherents, by the spiritual pestilence of errors abroad, and by the famine of the Word of God among them." (Pages 398, 399) The Bible Students believed religion was a "racket and a snare" and refused to be identified as a 'religion' for some time.


During ], Jehovah's Witnesses were targeted in the United States, Canada, and many other countries because they refused to serve in the military or contribute to the war effort due to their ]. In Canada, Jehovah's Witnesses were interned in camps<ref name=canww2>{{cite news|last=Yaffee|first=Barbara|title=Witnesses Seek Apology for Wartime Persecution|newspaper=The Globe and Mail|date=9 September 1984|page=4}}</ref> along with political dissidents and ].
In the United States in the late 1930s and into 1940, especially during wartime, mob violence against Jehovah's Witnesses became rampant. On June 16, 1940, the United States attorney general, Francis Biddle, made a radio broadcast over a coast-to-coast network in an effort to quiet the mob action, saying in part:


Jehovah's Witness members have been imprisoned in many countries for their refusal of ] or compulsory ]. Their religious activities are banned or restricted in some countries, including ], ], ], ] and many ].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Global Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses|year=2020|url=https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2020%20Issue%20Update%20-%20Jehovahs%20Witnesses.pdf |last1=Morton |first1=Jason |last2=Bakken |first2=Keely |last3=Omer |first3=Mohy |last4=Greenwalt |first4=Patrick |publisher=]}}</ref>
:''" . . . Jehovah's witnesses have been repeatedly set upon and beaten. They had committed no crime; but the mob adjudged they had, and meted out mob punishment. The Attorney General has ordered an immediate investigation of these outrages. The people must be alert and watchful, and above all cool and sane. Since mob violence will make the government's task infinitely more difficult, it will not be tolerated. We shall not defeat the Nazi evil by emulating its methods."''


==Countries==
After wartime, violent actions against Jehovah's Witnesses subsided, but, they were viewed with continued suspicion especially due to their doctrine of "neutrality," and especially during the ] in the 50s were viewed as possibly ]. As legal battles were won to establish their rights to preach from "door to door" and abstain from patriotic activities in schools, and the US society increasingly became more tolerant of non-mainstream viewpoints in the 60s and 70s, general opposition to Jehovah's Witnesses further subsided.
]


===Australia===
== ] ==
In 1930, the Watch Tower Society had controlling interests in several radio stations in Australia, including ], where presenters were told to preach and in 1931 began broadcasting sermons of ]. In 1933, the Australian government banned Rutherford's sermons, which included diatribes against the Catholic Church, the British Empire, and the United States.<ref name=Griffen>], "Radio Ministries: Religion on Australian Commercial Radio from the 1920s to the 1960s," ''Journal of Religious History'' (2008) 32#1 pp: 31–54. </ref> On 8 January 1941, the Watch Tower Society's stations were closed down, being described as dangerous to national security. Jehovah's Witnesses was declared an illegal organization on 17 January 1941, with World War II described as "an ideal opportunity to get rid of licensees long regarded as deviant".<ref name=Griffen/>
Jehovah's Witnesses base their practice of evangelism on scriptures, such as ]–]; they cite ] 20:20 as scriptural support for the manner in which this activity is carried out, and receive additional encouragement in this activity from their literature and local congregations. The Supreme Courts of many lands have established their rights to proceed with this activity.


=== Austria ===
The installation of ]s (the Witnesses' meeting places) is sometimes met by local opposition. As an example, in ] the inhabitants of the village of ] (resp. ]) in the ] '']'' of ] opposed the installation of Kingdom Halls. Reasons given were the fear of aggressive prozelytizing of minors, and the large size of the installations. In both cases, the number of Jehovah's Witnesses attending the Hall would have well exceeded the total population of the village.
In the period between 1978 and 2004, Jehovah's Witnesses sought registration as a religious society under the 1874 law, which they were repeatedly prevented from doing by state institutions for various reasons. The ] ruled in 2008 that Austria had thus violated Articles 9, 14, 6 and 13 of the Convention on Human Rights.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Case of Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria |url=https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/#%7B%22tabview%22:%5B%22document%22%5D,%22itemid%22:%5B%22001-88022%22%5D%7D |access-date=2024-03-02 |website=HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights (hudoc.echr.coe.int)}}</ref>


===Benin===
== From other religious groups ==
During the first presidency of ], activities of Jehovah's Witnesses were banned and members were forced to undergo "demystification training".<ref>{{cite book|last=Lamb|first=David|title=The Africans|date=2011|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|page=109|isbn=9780307797926}}</ref>{{Clarify|date=July 2010}}
Hostility from traditional, ] and ] Christians has been common, perhaps because of this group's rejection of many of the doctrines of mainstream Christian groups. For example, they teach that Jesus Christ is God's first creation rather than God Himself, and that the ] is not a person but God's active force. Orthodox Christians believe this contradicts the translation of John 1:1 given in the ] and other popular English translations; ] 1:3; ] 1:15-16; ] 1:8, 1:11 & chapter 5, 22:13, ] 2:5-11; and also what orthodoxs believe to be the historical teaching of Christianity. While many versions of the Bible translate these verses differently, Jehovah's Witnesses consistently translate some of these verses differently. <ref>''The King James Version Debate'' DA Carson p. 64</ref> (as some of the aforementioned texts have been regarded as spurious or inaccuractly translated) Witnesses teach that orthodox Christianity has been fundamentally wrong for most of its history (see ]). (See also ] and ] for more on these controversies.) Many have been critical of their opinion that our current time period is "the ]."


===Bulgaria===
== In Nazi Germany (1933-1945) ==
In ], Jehovah's Witnesses have been targets of violence by right-wing nationalist groups such as the ]. On April 17, 2011, a group of about sixty hooded men besieged a ] in ], during the annual ]. Attackers threw stones, damaged furniture, and injured at least five of the people gathered inside.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jw-media.org/bgr/20110421.htm|title=Свидетели на Йехова – официален уебсайт: jw.org|work=JW.ORG|access-date=8 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121209143311/http://www.jw-media.org/bgr/20110421.htm|archive-date=9 December 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy9lQjwwbEM |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211222/sy9lQjwwbEM |archive-date=2021-12-22 |url-status=live|title=Jehovah's Witnesses persecution 17-04-2011 commemoration in Bulgaria|date=18 April 2011|work=YouTube|access-date=8 August 2015}}{{cbignore}}</ref> The incident was recorded by a local television station.<ref>{{cite news|title=Brawl between Bulgarian Nationalists, Jehovah Witnesses Injures 5|url=http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/114219/brawl-between-bulgarian-nationalists-jehovah-witnesses-injures-5.html|newspaper=]|access-date=2011-04-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110426140400/http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/114219/brawl-between-bulgarian-nationalists-jehovah-witnesses-injures-5.html|archive-date=2011-04-26|url-status=dead}}</ref> Jehovah's Witnesses in Bulgaria have been fined for proselytizing without proper government permits, and some municipalities have legislation prohibiting or restricting their rights to preach.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2010/148922.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123111032/http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2010/148922.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=23 November 2010|title=Bulgaria|work=]|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref>
] in ] were persecuted between ] and ]. They were scorned by the name Ernste Bibelforscher (Earnest Bible Students) at that time, because Jehovah's Witnesses would not give allegiance to the ] party, and refused to serve in the military, they were detained, put in ]s, or imprisoned during ]. Unlike ]s, ] and ] who were persecuted for racial, political and social reasons. Jehovah's Witnesses were persecuted on religious ideological grounds. The Nazi government gave detained Jehovah's Witnesses the option if they were to renounce their faith, submit to the state authority, and support the German military they would be free to leave prison or the camps. Approximately 2,000 Jehovah's Witnesses were sent to concentration camps where they were forced to wear a ] that specifically identified them as Jehovah's Witnesses. In the end, 635 of their members who were incarcerated perished under the Nazi system. <ref>1974 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, p. 212</ref> All lost their employment, many were sent to regular prisons.


===Canada===
<blockquote>{{divbox|gray|Translation of Declaration That the SS Tried to Force Witnesses to Sign|
{{Main|Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Canada}}


In 1984, Canada released a number of previously classified documents which revealed that in the 1940s, "able bodied young Jehovah's Witnesses" were sent to "camps", and "entire families who practiced the religion were imprisoned".<ref name=canww2 /> The 1984 report stated, "Recently declassified wartime documents suggest was also a time of officially sanctioned religious bigotry, political intolerance and the suppression of ideas. The federal government described Jehovah's Witnesses as subversive and offensive 'religious zealots' … in secret reports given to special parliamentarian committees in 1942." It concluded that, "probably no other organization is so offensive in its methods, working as it does under the guise of Christianity. The documents prepared by the justice department were presented to a special House of Commons committee by the government of ] in an attempt to justify the outlawing of the organizations during the second world war."<ref>{{cite news|title=Secret Files Reveal Bigotry, Suppression|newspaper=]|date=4 September 1984}}</ref>
<small>Concentration camp .......................................<br />Department II</small>
<center>DECLARATION</center>
<small>I, the ...................................................<br />born on ..................................................<br />in .......................................................<br />herewith make the following declaration:</small>


===China===
#<small>I have come to know that the International Bible Students Association is proclaiming erroneous teachings and under the cloak of religion follows hostile purposes against the State.</small>
Jehovah's Witnesses' activities in China are considered illegal. Former Canadian-American Jehovah's Witness missionary ] recounted the lengths that she and her husband went through to preach illegally in China in the early 2000s. She describes how local Jehovah's Witnesses were forced to meet secretly in a different location every week, with invites by word-of-mouth only.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-june-5-2019-1.5161876/june-5-2019-episode-transcript-1.5163559| title = June 5, 2019 episode transcript {{!}} CBC Radio}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Scorah|first=Amber|year=2019|title=Leaving the Witness|url=https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/549565/leaving-the-witness-by-amber-scorah/|publisher=Viking|isbn=9780735222540|author-link=Amber Scorah}}</ref> She also describes how they would vet potential converts to make sure they had no Communist ties or leanings.<!--This only indicates fear of persecution rather than any actual indication of persecution--><ref>{{Cite episode|title=Former Jehovah's Witness says she was turned away from the religion for having doubts|url=https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-june-5-2019-1.5161876/former-jehovah-s-witness-says-she-was-turned-away-from-the-religion-for-having-doubts-1.5161881|access-date=13 November 2019|series=The Current|first=Anna Maria|last=Tremonti|network=CBC Radio|date=5 June 2019|transcript=June 5, 2019 episode transcript|transcript-url=https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-june-5-2019-1.5161876/june-5-2019-episode-transcript-1.5163559|quote=You're basically trying to discern whether the person had any connections to the Chinese Communist Party or the government or any family members who were potentially people that would turn you in for the preaching work that you were doing.|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|last=Scorah|first=Amber|date=1 February 2013|others=Illustration by Tony Millionaire|title=Leaving the Witness: A Preacher Finds Freedom to Think in Totalitarian China|url=https://believermag.com/leaving-the-witness/|magazine=]|quote=Anyone who was a party member posed a potential danger, and contact was to be cut off immediately; a party member might turn in a Witness out of loyalty to the regime.|access-date=13 November 2019}}</ref>
#<small>I therefore left the organization entirely and made myself absolutely free from the teachings of this sect.</small>
#<small>I herewith give assurance that I will never again take any part in the activity of the International Bible Students Association. Any persons approaching me with the teaching of the Bible Students, or who in any manner reveal their connections with them, I will denounce immediately. All literature from the Bible Students that should be sent to my address I will at once deliver to the nearest police station.</small>
#<small>I will in the future esteem the laws of the State, especially in the event of war will I, with weapon in hand, defend the fatherland, and join in every way the community of the people.</small>
#<small>I have been informed that I will at once be taken again into protective custody if I should act against the declaration given today.</small>


===Cuba===
<small>.................................., Dated ................<br />...........................................................<br />Signature</small>}}
{{See also|Military Units to Aid Production|Human rights in Cuba}}
(Quoted from ''Jehovah's Witnesses--Proclaimers of God's Kingdom'' (1993), Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, p. 661. .)</blockquote>
Under ]'s communist regime, Jehovah's Witnesses were included among groups considered to be "social deviants" and were sent to ] ] to be "reeducated".<ref>{{cite book|title=A contemporary Cuba reader|author1=Philip Brenner|author2=Marguerite Rose Jiménez|author3=John M. Kirk|author4=William M. LeoGrande|author-link4=William M. LeoGrande}}</ref> On July 1, 1974 the group was officially banned and their places of worship closed. Following the ban, members who refused military service were imprisoned for three years; it was reported that members were also imprisoned because of their children's refusal to salute the flag.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://worldview.carnegiecouncil.org/archive/worldview/1976/12/2785.html/_res/id=sa_File1/v19_i012_a004.pdf|title=Report: Jehovah's Witnesses in Cuba|last=Calzon|first=Frank|date=December 1, 1976|journal=Worldview Magazine|access-date=9 August 2015|publisher=Carnegie Council|edition=12|volume=19}}</ref>


===Eritrea===
As early as ], political and religious factions accused the Witnesses of being linked with the Jews in subversive political movements. Bible Students were branded as the dangerous, ], "Jewish worm." In response, the ], ], German edition of The ] (forerunner of Awake!) stated: "We have no reason to regard this false accusation as an insult as we are convinced that the Jew is at least as valuable a person as a nominal ]; but we reject the above untruth of the church tabloid because it is aimed at deprecating our work, as if it were being done not for the sake of the Gospel but for the Jews." Swiss theologian ] later wrote: "The accusation that Jehovah's Witnesses are linked with the ]s can only be due to an involuntary or even intentional misunderstanding."
In ], the government stripped Jehovah's Witnesses of their civil and political rights in 1994 after their refusal to engage in voting and military service.<ref>{{cite web|title=Eritrea: Torture fears for 28 Jehovah's Witnesses arrested, including 90-year-old man|publisher=Amnesty International UK|date=19 February 2004|url=https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/eritrea-torture-fears-28-jehovahs-witnesses-arrested-including-90-year-old-man|access-date=26 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Fisher|first=Jonah|title=Religious persecution in Eritrea|work=BBC News|date=17 September 2004|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3663654.stm|access-date=26 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Plaut|first=Martin|title=Christians protest over Eritrea|work=BBC News|date=28 June 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6249028.stm|access-date=26 December 2014}}</ref> Members of all ages have been arrested for participating in religious meetings.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jw.org/en/news/legal/by-region/eritrea/jehovahs-witnesses-in-prison/|title=Imprisoned for Their Faith|publisher=Watch Tower Society}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Eritrea - No Progress on Key Human Rights Concerns|work=Amnesty International Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review|publisher=Amnesty International|date=January–February 2014|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr64/007/2013/en/|access-date=28 December 2014}}</ref> On 24 September 1994, three members were arrested and imprisoned without trial.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/USCIRF_AR_2016_Tier1_Eritrea.pdf
|title=Eritrea|website=uscirf.gov|access-date=26 September 2023}}</ref><ref name="Eritrea20">{{cite web|url=http://www.jw.org/en/news/legal/by-region/eritrea/jehovahs-witnesses-unjust-imprisonment-20-years/|title=Twenty Years of Imprisonment in Eritrea—Will It Ever End?|date=24 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Hendricks III |first=Robert J. |title=Aliens for Their Faith |work=] |publisher=] |date=July–August 2010 |url=http://www.libertymagazine.org/article/aliens-for-their-faith |access-date=26 December 2014}}</ref> International rights groups are aware of the situation of Jehovah's Witnesses in Eritrea<ref name="Eritrea20" /> and have repeatedly called for Eritrean authorities to end the persecution.<ref>{{cite conference|chapter=Eritrea|title=USCIRF Annual Report 2014|pages=54–57|publisher=]|year=2014|chapter-url=http://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/Eritrea%202014.pdf#page=2|access-date=26 December 2014}}</ref>


As of July 2016, 55 members were imprisoned.<ref>{{cite book|title=2017 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses|publisher=Watch Tower Society|page=32}}</ref> According to the Watch Tower Society, 28 members were released on December 4, 2020,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/eritrea/Eritrea-Releases-28-Jehovahs-Witnesses-From-Prison|title=Eritrea Releases 28 Jehovah's Witnesses From Prison|publisher=Watch Tower Society}}</ref> and another four were released in early 2021.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/eritrea/Eritrean-Authorities-Release-Another-One-of-Jehovahs-Witnesses-From-Prison/|title=Eritrea Releases 28 Jehovah's Witnesses From Prison|publisher=Watch Tower Society}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/eritrea/Eritrean-Authorities-Release-Three-More-Jehovahs-Witnesses-Imprisoned-for-Their-Faith/|title=Eritrean Authorities Release Three More Jehovah's Witnesses Imprisoned for Their Faith|publisher=Watch Tower Society}}</ref>
In May 1933 the ] searched the house of Ewald Vorsteher, who had been disfellowshipped from the society in the 1920s for refusing to accept the new leadership following the crisis sparked by ]'s death in 1917. The writings found in his home were highly critical of Hitler's regime, and were used as a basis for condemning the Jehovah's Witnesses. The Watchtower Society reacted by strongly rejecting Ewald Vorsteher and his opinions.


===France===
=== Jehovah witnesses and Nazi regime===
{{See also|Jehovah's Witnesses and governments#France|l1=Jehovah's Witnesses and governments (France)}}
Prior to ], the French government banned the '']'', and ordered that the French offices of the ] be vacated.{{#tag:ref|"The Organization is Banned In mid-October 1939, about six weeks after the beginning of the war, the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses was banned in France."<ref>{{harvp|Anonymous|1980|pp=87–89}}</ref>|group=Note}} After the war, Jehovah's Witnesses in France renewed their operations. In December 1952, France's ] banned '']'' magazine, citing its position on ].<ref>{{harvp|Anonymous|1980|p=128}}</ref> The ban was lifted on November 26, 1974.<ref>''1976 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses''</ref><ref>"Announcements", ''Our Kingdom Ministry'', February 1975, page 3</ref>


In the 1990s and 2000s, the French government included Jehovah's Witnesses on its list of "]s", and governmental ministers made derogatory public statements about Jehovah's Witnesses.{{#tag:ref|" Government has a stated policy of monitoring potentially 'dangerous' cult activity through the Inter-ministerial Monitoring Mission against Sectarian Abuses (MIVILUDES). … In 1997 the special prison at Strasbourg for Jehovah's Witnesses for refusing conscription was still active. In January 2005, MIVILUDES published a guide for public servants instructing them how to spot and combat 'dangerous' sects. … The Jehovah's Witnesses were mentioned"<ref>"France: International Religious Freedom Report 2006", U.S. Department of State, </ref>|group=Note}} Despite a century of activity in the country, France's Ministry of Finance opposed official recognition of the denomination; it was not until June 23, 2000 that France's highest administrative court, the Council of State, ruled that Jehovah's Witnesses qualify as a religion under French law.<ref>"Highest administrative court in France rules that Jehovah's Witnesses are a religion", News release June 23, 2000, ''Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081011222238/http://www.jw-media.org/region/europe/france/english/releases/religious_freedom/fra_e000623.htm|date=2008-10-11}}</ref> France's ] sought to collect 60% of donations made to the denomination's entities; Witnesses called the taxation "confiscatory" and appealed to the ].{{#tag:ref|"Jehovah's Witnesses awaited a ruling by the ECHR on the admissibility of a case contesting the government's assessment of their donations at a 60 percent tax rate. The government had imposed the high rate relative to other religious groups after ruling the group to be a harmful cult. If the assessed tax, which totaled more than 57 million euros (approximately $77.5 million) as of year's end, were to be paid, it would consume all of the group's buildings and assets in the country."<ref name="FIRFR2008">"France: International Religious Freedom Report 2008", U.S. Department of State, </ref>|group=Note}}{{#tag:ref|"France's highest court of appeal, the ''Cour de cassation'', has handed down its decision in a case between the ''Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah'', a not-for-profit religious association used by Jehovah's Witnesses in France, and the national tax department, the ''Direction des services fiscaux''. Following a tax inspection lasting 18 months, the tax department established that ''Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah'', whose sole revenue consists of religious donations by its adherents, was run in a completely benevolent fashion, and that its activities were not commercial or for profit. Nevertheless, the tax department levied a 60-percent tax on the religious donations made over a period of four years, between 1993 and 1996. … This is the first time in their 100-year existence in France that Jehovah's Witnesses have been taxed in this manner. … Furthermore, this tax has not been imposed on any other religious organization in France. The ''Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah'' has decided to institute proceedings against this confiscatory taxation before the European Court of Human Rights."<ref>"French High Court confirms 60-percent confiscatory tax measure on religious donations", News release October 6, 2004, ''Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080518155309/http://www.jw-media.org/newsroom/index.htm?content=%2Fregion%2Feurope%2Ffrance%2Fenglish%2Freleases%2Freligious_freedom%2Ffra_e041006.htm|date=2008-05-18}}</ref>|group=Note}}<!--Outcome??--> On June 30, 2011, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that France's actions violated the religious freedom of Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/article.aspx?id=45917|title=Euro Court backs Jehovah's Witnesses against France|access-date=2011-07-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928055442/http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/article.aspx?id=45917|archive-date=2011-09-28|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Because of the evident hostility of the ] regime, Jehovah's Witnesses organized a convention in ], on ], 1933. Some 7,000 persons assembled.
The Witnesses publicly made their intentions clear.
The position in favor of the regime during those years is clearly explained in a Society formal letter to Hitler unanimously accepted by all Jehovah witnesses.
This declaration is called “'''Declaration of Facts'''”<ref>Declaration of Facts () </ref>


Jehovah's Witnesses in France have reported hundreds of criminal attacks against their adherents and places of worship.{{#tag:ref|"According to representatives for the Jehovah's Witnesses community, there were 65 acts of vandalism against the group in the country through December including ]s aimed at Jehovah's Witnesses' property. … According to the leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses community in the country, there were 98 acts against individuals for 2006 and 115 acts in 2007."<ref name="FIRFR2008"/>|group=Note}}
The society did not succeed in its try to show there was no society opposition to Nazis regime: "Our organization is not political in any sense. We only insist on teaching
the Word of Jehovah God to the people, and that without hindrance. We do not object or try to hinder anyone's teaching or believing what he desires."and did not succeed in its try to show that the society shered the regime Ideals: "A careful examination of our books and literature will disclose the fact that the very high ideals held and promulgated by the present national government are set forth in and endorsed and strongly emphasized in our publications". During World War II and the Nazis killed 2000 Jehovah witnesses.


====French dependencies====
An accurate research about this document and the facts in that period as been made by many researchers as Doctor M. James Penton a professor emeritus in the Department of History at the University of Lethbridge.
During the ban of ''The Watchtower'' in France, publication of the magazine continued in various French territories. In ], the magazine was covertly published under the name, ''La Sentinelle'', though it was later learned that ''The Watchtower'' had not been banned locally.<ref>{{cite book|title=2005 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses|pages=88–89}}</ref> In ], the magazine was published under the name, ''Bulletin intérieur''.<ref>''2007 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses'', p. 255</ref>
In his book "Jehovah's Witnesses and the Third Reich", drawing on his own Witness background and years of research on Witness history, Penton exams the facts during this dark period.


===Georgia===
<div style="direction: ltr;">
In 1996, a year after ] adopted its ] ],<ref>''Parliament of Georgia'' website, , "The Constitution of Georgia – Adopted on 24 August 1995"</ref> the country's ] began a campaign to confiscate religious literature belonging to Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref>"Jehovah's Witnesses in Georgia: Chronology of Acts of Violence and Intimidation", ''Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses'', {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120154723/http://www.jw-media.org/region/europe/georgia/english/human_rights/e_chronology.htm|date=2008-11-20}}</ref><ref>"Georgia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices", ], February 23, 2000, </ref> Individual Witnesses fled Georgia seeking religious refugee status in other nations.<ref>T. L. v. Ministry of Internal Affairs, V SA 1969/95, Poland: High Administrative Court, 17 September 1996, , "On 12 May 1995 during the "status interview" conducted by the officer of the Ministry of Internal Affairs' Office the applicant declared additionally that, among others, she could not return to the country, because since 1989 she had been the Jehovah Witness (]) and she feared that she could be arrested for that reason."</ref> Government officials refused permits for Jehovah's Witnesses to organize assemblies, and law enforcement officials dispersed legal assemblies. In September 2000, "Georgian police and security officials fired blank anti-tank shells and used force to disperse an outdoor gathering of some 700 Jehovah's Witnesses in the town of Natuliki in northwestern Georgia on 8 September, AP and Caucasus Press reported."<ref>Encyclopedia.com, </ref> In 2002, prosecution of a priest who instigated violence against Jehovah's Witness members was impeded by a lack of cooperation by government and law enforcement.<ref>{{cite news|title=Georgia: Intimidation Sabotages Trial of Violent Priest|author=Felix Corley|newspaper=Keston News Service|date=February 7, 2002|publisher=Keston Institute|location=Oxford, UK}} as cited by Eurasianet.org, , " does not believe judge Chkheidze did enough. "He should have done more to protect the security of participants. Five policemen were present but left the courtroom before the hearing started. We don't know why. Maybe they were instructed to do so." In a statement issued after the trial, the Jehovah's Witnesses reported that about three hundred of Mkalavishvili's supporters, mostly men, armed with metal and wooden crosses, tried to invade the courtroom before the hearing began. "Many entered and occupied areas reserved for attorneys as they rang their religious bell and waved large anti-Jehovah's Witness banners. As the victims' attorneys made their way through the mob to Judge Ioseb Chkheidze's chambers, they overheard security police being ordered away from the scene. The courtroom was left with no security." Attorneys explained to Chkheidze that under these circumstances it was impossible to proceed with the trial as it was too dangerous for the victims or their attorneys to attend."</ref>
''The 1934 Yearbook of Jehova Witnesses beginning on page 130 said:'' "In June, the president of the Society visited Germany to take some action to get the Society's property restored to our possession and to carry on the work further. Knowing that the enemy has misrepresented the facts to the government, a Declaration of Facts was prepared, and on the 25th day of June, 1933, more than 7,000 of Jehovah's witnesses assembled at Berlin and unanimously adopted the resolution, millions of which were printed and distributed throughout Germany. That resolution is as follows, to wit: " Declaration of Facts" ...
----


In 2004, ] referred to the period since 1999 as a "five-year reign of terror" against Jehovah's Witnesses and other religious minorities.<ref>"Georgia: Will violent attackers of religious minorities be punished?" by Felix Corley, ''F18News'', Forum 18 News Service, published 16 August 2004, </ref> ] noted: "Jehovah's Witnesses have frequently been a target for violence … in Georgia … In many of the incidents police are said to have failed to protect the believers, or even to have participated in physical and verbal abuse."<ref>AmnestyUSA.org, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090625093920/http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=801E963F3E8104D380256B280043704C|date=2009-06-25}}</ref>
Citations from Declaration of Facts:


On May 3, 2007, the ] ruled against the government of Georgia for its toleration of religious violence toward Jehovah's Witnesses and ordered the victims be compensated for moral damages and legal costs.<ref>"Chronological List of Judgments and Published Decisions", ''European Court of Human Rights'',, p. 203 of 285, May 3, 2007, Listing "7148 3.5.2007 Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie/Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no/no. 71156/01 (Sect. 2), CEDH/ECHR 2007-V"</ref><ref>, pp. 13–14 (of 53)</ref><ref>"European Court rules against Georgia's campaign of terror", ''Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090725094027/http://www.jw-media.org/region/europe/georgia/english/releases/intolerance/geo_e070503.htm|date=2009-07-25}}</ref> On October 7, 2014, the European Court of Human Rights, giving its judgement concerning violence against Jehovah's Witnesses in Georgia in the years 2000–2001, unanimously held that Georgia's state officials, in violation of Articles 3, 9 & 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, had either directly participated in those attacks or had tolerated violence by private individuals against members of the religious group.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.humanrightseurope.org/2014/10/georgia-authorities-ineffective-in-preventing-and-stopping-anti-jehovahs-witnesses-violence/|title=Georgia: Authorities ineffective in preventing and stopping anti-Jehovah's Witnesses violence|publisher=EHRC October 7, 2014|access-date=6 April 2016}}</ref>
''from page 134'': "The greatest and the most oppressive empire on earth is the Anglo-American empire. By that is meant the British Empire, of which the United States of America forms a part. It has been the commercial Jews of the British-American empire that have built up and carried on Big Business as a means of exploiting and oppressing the peoples of many nations. This fact particularly applies to the cities of London and New York, the stronghold of Big Business. This fact is so manifest in America that there is a proverb concerning the city of New York which says: 'The Jews own it, the Irish Catholics rule it, and the Americans pay the bills.' We have no fight with any of these persons mentioned, but, as the witnesses for Jehovah and in obedience to his commandment set forth in the Scriptures, we are compelled to call attention to the truth concerning the same in order that the people may be enlightened concerning God and his purpose."...


====South Ossetia====
----
In July 2017, the Supreme Court of ] ruled that Jehovah's Witnesses were an extreme organization. The court declared a penalty of ten years' imprisonment for "any religious activities such as assembly and distributing literature".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Morrison|first1=Thea|title=Occupied S. Ossetia Bans Jehovah's Witnesses as 'Extremist'|url=http://georgiatoday.ge/news/7882/Occupied-S.-Ossetia-Bans-Jehovah%27s-Witnesses-as-%27Extremist%27|access-date=21 January 2018|work=Georgia Today on the Web|date=17 October 2017|archive-date=23 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171123173828/http://georgiatoday.ge/news/7882/Occupied-S.-Ossetia-Bans-Jehovah%27s-Witnesses-as-%27Extremist%27|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Udodiong|first1=Inemesit|title=Can you believe another city has labelled Jehovah"s Witnesses as an extremist group?|url=http://www.pulse.ng/communities/religion/south-ossetia-labels-jehovahs-witnesses-as-an-extremist-group-id7478962.html|access-date=21 January 2018|work=Pulse.ng|date=18 October 2017}}</ref>


===Germany===
''from page 135'': "The present government of Germany has declared emphatically against Big Business oppressors and in opposition to the wrongful religious influence in the political affairs of the nation. Such is exactly our position; and we further state in our literature the reason for the existence of oppressive Big Business and the wrongful political religious influence... "
{{Main|Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Nazi Germany}}
----


During 1931 and 1932, more than 2000 legal actions were instigated against Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany and members of the group were dismissed from employment.<ref>"Firm in Faith Despite Opposition", ''The Watchtower'', June 15, 1967, pp. 366–367.</ref> Persecution intensified following ]'s appointment as chancellor in 1933 and continued until 1945.<ref>"Germany", ''1974 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses'', pp. 116–117</ref> A "]" was issued at a Jehovah's Witness convention in Berlin on June 25, 1933, asserting the group's political neutrality and calling for an end to government opposition. More than 2.1 million copies of the statement were distributed throughout Germany,<ref name="apocalypse">{{Cite book|last=Penton|first=M.J.|title=Apocalypse Delayed|publisher=University of Toronto Press|year=1997|pages=147–149|isbn=9780802079732}}</ref> but its distribution prompted a new wave of persecution against members of the denomination in Germany, whose refusal to give the ], join Nazi organizations or perform military service demonstrated their opposition to the totalitarian ideology of ].<ref>{{harvp|Garbe|2008|pp=512–524}}</ref>
''from page 136'': "To know Jehovah God and his gracious provision for humankind is of most vital importance to all persons, because God has declared in His Word that where there is no vision or understanding of his Word the people perish. (Proverbs 29:18) We have devoted our lives and our material substance to the work of enabling the people to gain a vision or understanding of God's Word, and therefore it is impossible for our literature and our work to be a menace to the peace and safety of the nation. Instead of being against the principles advocated by the government of Germany, we stand squarely for such principles, and point out that Jehovah God through Christ Jesus will bring about the full realization of these principles and will give to the people peace and prosperity and the greatest desire of every honest heart."


On October 4, 1934, congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany sent telegrams of protest and warning to Hitler. The Watch Tower Society reported that according to ], a government officer in Germany at the time, Hitler was shown a number of telegrams protesting the Third Reich's persecution of the Bible Students. Wittig reported: "Hitler jumped to his feet and with clenched fists hysterically screamed: 'This brood will be exterminated in Germany!' Four years after this discussion I was able, by my own observations, to convince myself … that Hitler's outburst of anger was not just an idle threat. No other group of prisoners of the named concentration-camps was exposed to the sadism of the SS-soldiery in such a fashion as the Bible Students were. It was a sadism marked by an unending chain of physical and mental tortures, the likes of which no language in the world can express."<ref>"Foreign Activities Under Fascist-Nazi Persecution", ''The Watchtower'', August 1, 1955, p. 462.</ref><ref>"Germany", ''1974 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses'', p. 138.</ref>
----


About 10,000 Witnesses were imprisoned, including 2000 sent to ], where they were identified by ]s; as many as 1200 died, including 250 who were executed.<ref>{{harvp|Garbe|2008|p=484}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.holocaust-trc.org/Jehovah.htm |title=Jehovah's Witnesses |publisher=Holocaust Teacher Resource Center |date= |access-date=2022-04-20}}</ref> From 1935 Gestapo officers offered members a document to sign indicating renouncement of their faith, submission to state authority, and support of the German military. Historian Detlef Garbe says a "relatively high number" of people signed the statement before the war, but "extremely low numbers" of Bible Student prisoners did so in concentration camps in later years.<ref>{{harvp|Garbe|2008|pp=286–291}}</ref>
from page 137 ... "A careful examination of our books and literature will disclose the fact that the very high ideals held and promulgated by the present national government are set forth in and endorsed and strongly emphasized in our publications, and show that Jehovah God will see to it that these high ideals in due time will be attained by all persons who love righteousness and who obey the Most High. Instead, therefore, of our literature and our work's being a menace to the principles of the present government we are the strongest supporters of such high ideals.”…
</div>


After a short, unstable period after WWII, the Witnesses continued to suffer severe persecution in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). The Potsdam Agreement of 1945 guaranteed religious freedom and respect for organizations,<ref>{{cite web |title=Berlin (Potsdam) Conference, 1945 Report |url=https://maint.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/m-ust000003-1224.pdf |access-date=December 8, 2024 |website=Library of Potsdam Conference}}</ref> which also applied to East Germany. When the GDR was established in 1949, the ] included similar guarantees for the practice of religion. However it became clear that these promises were symbolic and had little impact on the ruling authorities' policies. The government restricted the activities of the Protestant and Catholic Churches and banned several smaller religious groups. The Jehovah's Witnesses were subject to the harshest and most prolonged persecution.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Veen |first1=Hans-Joachim |title=Lexikon Opposition und Widerstand in der SED-Diktatur |date=January 1, 2000 |publisher=Propyläen |isbn=3549071256 |edition=German}}</ref> According to the official Jehovah's Witnesses webpage, <blockquote>"Congregation meetings were again broken up by the police. Literature was confiscated. Roads were blockaded to prevent the Witnesses from attending a convention. Brothers were arrested. On August 31, 1950, an official ban was imposed. The Witnesses in East Germany were again forced underground, this time by a Communist regime, not to emerge until almost 40 years later."<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |date=1999 |title=Germany |url=https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/301999000 |journal=1999 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses |pages=78-80 |via=Watchtower Online Library}}</ref> </blockquote>According to Mike Dennis, the main agent of "control surveillance and persecution was the Ministry of State Security, popularly known as the Stasi." Its "mission was to serve as the shield and sword of the SED and to protect the socialist system and the East German state from internal and external threats, especially by uncovering and forestalling 'the hostile plans of the aggressive imperialists and their helpers."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dennis |first1=Mike |title=Surviving the Stasi: Jehovah's Witnesses in Communist East Germany, 1965 to 1989 |journal=Religion, State & Society |date=June 2006 |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=145–168 |doi=10.1080/09637490600624725 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/09637490600624725?needAccess=true}}</ref> The Jehovah's Witness website says that in total almost 5,000 Witnesses were imprisoned in 231 places.<ref name=":2" /> Hans-Hermann Dirksen mentions that there were many reasons why this group was persecuted, but primarily because the German Democratic Republic saw their religious activities as "detrimental to their political activities."<ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Dirksen |first1=Hans-Hermann |title='All Over the World Jehovah's Witnesses are the Touchstone for the Existence of True Democracy': Persecution of a Religious Minority in the German Democratic Republic |journal=Religion, State & Society |date=June 2006 |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=127–143 |doi=10.1080/09637490600624808 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/09637490600624808?needAccess=true}}</ref> Because the group remained neutral, the SED saw the group as "dangerous and among the enemies of socialism."<ref name=":1" /> Trials were conducted against the Witnesses because their activities "were deemed as unconstitutional and their investigations proved they were disguised as espionage." The Stasi then proceeded to use new methods to create insecurity within the organization by infiltrating the group in the 1960s.<ref name=":1" /> Another reason they were persecuted was because the organization's headquarters were in the United States, an enemy of the GDR. The organization remained faithful and continued its service throughout the decades of persecution. It was their "solidarity as a community which enabled them to withstand, often with great stoicism, decomposition and liquidation measures."<ref name=":1" />
----


In ], in a document produced to clarify their neutral stance, they told Hitler that they "have no interest in political affairs, but are wholly devoted to ] under Christ His King."
After intensified persecution of this group, a world-wide body of Jehovah's Witnesses passed a resolution in ] again strongly condemning the Nazi regime.
During the same time period this group was also persecuted in the ] and many other countries for similar reasons, mainly because they refused to serve in the military or help with war efforts. In ] during that time, Jehovah's Witnesses were interned in camps along with political dissidents and people of ]ese and ] descent. In the United States, the ] issued a series of landmark ] rulings that confirmed the Jehovah's Witnesses right to be excused from military service and the recitation of the ]. (See also ].)


Despite more than a century of conspicuous activity in the country, Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany were not granted legal recognition until March 25, 2005, in Berlin;{{#tag:ref|"A Berlin court ruled on Thursday that Jehovah's Witnesses are entitled to the same privileges enjoyed by Germany's major Catholic and Protestant churches, ending a 15-year legal fight about the group's status."<ref>"Jehovah's Witnesses Granted Legal Status", ''Deutsche Welle'', March 25, 2005, http://www.dw-world.de/popups/popup_printcontent/0,,1530197,00.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110218141042/http://www.dw-world.de/popups/popup_printcontent/0,,1530197,00.html |date=2011-02-18 }} As Retrieved 2009-08-26, </ref>|group=Note}} in 2006 ] in ] extended the local decision to apply nationwide.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Jehovah's Witnesses: February 27, 2006 News Release |url=http://www.jw-media.org/region/europe/germany/english/releases/religious_freedom/ger_e060227.htm |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20091105124413/http://www.jw-media.org:80/region/europe/germany/english/releases/religious_freedom/ger_e060227.htm |archive-date=2009-11-05 |access-date=2024-12-16 |website=www.jw-media.org}}</ref>
==References==
<div class="references-small"><references/></div>


===India===
== External links ==

*
Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information has documented a number of mob attacks in India.<ref>{{cite web|title=Legal & Human Rights Facts: Jehovah's Witnesses in India|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/legal/by-region/india/jehovah-witness-facts/#?insight=24484d7e-06fa-4a95-930c-0e41bf67b856&insight=0|website=JW.ORG|access-date=21 January 2018|language=en}}</ref> It states that these instances of violence "reveal the country's hostility toward its own citizens who are Christians."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jw-media.org/ind/index.htm|title=यहोवा के साक्षियों की वेब साइट: jw.org|work=JW.ORG|access-date=8 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120717031738/http://www.jw-media.org/ind/index.htm|archive-date=17 July 2012|url-status=dead}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=December 2014}} There have been reports that police assist mob attacks on Jehovah's Witnesses or lay charges against the Witnesses while failing to charge other participants involved.<ref>{{cite web|title=July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report|publisher=]|date=September 13, 2011|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2010_5/168245.htm|access-date=26 December 2014}}</ref>
*

*
In ] on December 20, 2010 a mob confronted two female Witnesses. The mob broke into the home of one of the Witnesses where they had taken refuge. Property was damaged and one of the Witnesses was assaulted. When the police arrived, the Witnesses were arrested and charged with blasphemy.<ref>{{cite news|last=Jess|first=Kevin|title=Hindu mob attacks Christian women, police back mob|work=Digital Journal|date=February 16, 2011|url=http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/303737|access-date=27 December 2014}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=June 2021}} In another incident on December 6, 2011, three Witnesses were attacked by a mob in ].<ref>{{cite web|title=2011 Report on International Religious Freedom – India|url=http://www.refworld.org/docid/502105b416.html|website=Refworld|publisher=United States Department of State|access-date=20 January 2018|language=en}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=June 2021}} The male Witness "was kicked and pummeled by the mob" and then dragged towards a nearby temple; while making lewd remarks, the mob "tried to tear the clothes off of the female Witnesses". According to the Watch Tower Society, the police "took the three Witnesses to the police station and filed charges against them rather than the mob".<ref>"Violence against Jehovah's Witnesses in India escalates as police assist mob attacks", ''Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses'', {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120107123059/http://www.jw-media.org/ind/20111216.htm|date=2012-01-07}}</ref>{{failed verification|date=December 2014}} During a July 2012 incident, a group of fifteen men assaulted four Witnesses in Madikeri. The group was taken to a police station and charged with "insulting the religion or religious beliefs of another class" before being released on bail.<ref>{{cite web|title=USCIRF Annual Report 2013 – Tier 2: India|work=refworld|publisher=UNHCR The UN Refugee Agency|date=30 April 2013|url=http://www.refworld.org/docid/51826eed1a.html|access-date=27 December 2014}}</ref>
* , on a website critical of the Jehovah's Witnesses

*
In October 2023, ] at a Jehovah's Witnesses annual convention in ] killed 7 people and injured 50 others. The suspect claimed to be a disillusioned member of the Jehovah's Witnesses, and said he resented the Witnesses' anti-national doctrines.<ref name="Hindu">{{cite news |title=Woman killed, several injured in explosion at a convention centre in Kerala's Kalamassery |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/people-killed-several-injured-in-explosion-at-a-convention-centre-in-kalamassery/article67472535.ece/amp/ |work=The Hindu |date=29 October 2023 |language=en-IN |access-date=29 October 2023 |archive-date=29 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231029093322/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/people-killed-several-injured-in-explosion-at-a-convention-centre-in-kalamassery/article67472535.ece/amp/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news |title=Kerala attacks: India police investigate deadly blasts targeting Jehovah's Witnesses |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |first1=Cherylann |last1=Mollan |first2=Ashraf |last2=Padanna |date=30 October 2023 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-67259078 |access-date=2023-10-30 |archive-date=30 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231030102709/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-67259078 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2023/12/02/kalamassery-blast-death-toll-up-to-seven.html |title=Kalamassery blast: One more succumbs to injuries, death toll up to 7 |website=onmanorama}}</ref>
*

===Kazakhstan===
Jehovah's Witnesses' activities in Kazakhstan were banned until 1997.<ref>https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/13/0 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref> After the ban was lifted, members continued to experience police disruption and imprisonment.<ref>https://webarchive.archive.unhcr.org/20240214101123/https://www.refworld.org/docid/5b20ddaba.html {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref><ref>https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/17/4 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref><ref>https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/17/2 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref> Their activities are currently registered only in some regions of Kazakhstan, and the Watch Tower Society reports that the use of their literature is restricted.<ref>https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/17/0 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref><ref>https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/18/0 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref>

===Malawi===

In 1967, thousands of Jehovah's Witnesses in ] were beaten and killed, houses and gathering places where burned along with their bibles and publications by police and citizens for refusing to purchase a card indicating endorsement of the ].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Jubber|first=Ken|title=The Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Southern Africa|journal=Social Compass|volume=24|pages=121–134|year=1977|doi=10.1177/003776867702400108|issue=1|s2cid=143997010}}</ref> While their political neutrality during the time of the old Colonial government was seen as an act of resistance, their continued non-involvement with the new independent government was viewed as treasonous.<ref>{{cite book|last=Tengatenga|first=James|title=Church, State, and Society in Malawi: An Analysis of Anglican Ecclesiology|publisher=Kachere Series|year=2006|page=113|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pybg3jpwz70C&pg=PA113|isbn=9990876517}}</ref> The organization was declared illegal and foreign members in the country were expelled. Persecution, both economic and physical, intensified after a September 1972 Malawi Congress Party meeting which stated that "all Witnesses should be dismissed from their employment; any firm that failed to comply would have its license cancelled". By November 1973, 21,000 Jehovah's Witnesses had fled to neighboring ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Carver|first=Richard|title=Where Silence Rules: The Suppression of Dissent in Malawi|publisher=Human Rights Watch|year=1990|pages=64–66|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZyIpVV3FZlAC&pg=PA63|isbn=9780929692739}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Howard-Hassmann|first=Rhoda E.|title=Human Rights in Commonwealth Africa|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|year=1986|page=110|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B8wmGpg9nf0C&pg=PA110|isbn=0847674339}}</ref> In 1993, during the transition to a multiparty system and a change in leadership, the government's ban on the organization was lifted.<ref>{{cite conference|chapter=Parliamentary Debates|title=Kenya National Assembly Official Record (Hansard)|pages=499|date=19 April 1995|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_FQb4Ulgz0sC&pg=RA6-PA499|access-date=27 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Malawi Human Rights Practices, 1993|publisher=U.S. Department Of State|date=January 31, 1994|url=http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/democracy/1993_hrp_report/93hrp_report_africa/Malawi.html|access-date=27 December 2014|archive-date=3 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200903161158/http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/democracy/1993_hrp_report/93hrp_report_africa/Malawi.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Malawi A new future for human rights|publisher=Amnesty International|date=February 1994|url=https://www.amnesty.org/ar/documents/afr36/002/1994/ar/|access-date=27 December 2014|archive-date=3 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200903154231/https://www.amnesty.org/ar/documents/afr36/002/1994/ar//|url-status=dead}}</ref>

===Russia===
{{Main|Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia}}
In 2004, the Moscow City Court banned the activities of Jehovah's Witnesses in ] and their legal entity was liquidated.<ref>{{cite web |title=Jehovah's Witnesses Banned in Moscow |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210212004939/https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1848315 |archive-date=2021-02-12 |url-status=live |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1848315}}</ref> Russian anti-extremism laws were extended to non-violent groups in 2007 and Jehovah's Witnesses were banned in the port city of ] in 2009 after a local court ruled that the organization was guilty of inciting religious hatred by "propagating the exclusivity and supremacy" of their religious beliefs.<ref name="beard">{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/jehovah-s-witnesses-targeted-under-russia-s-anti-extremism-laws-simply-practising-their-pacifist-faith-say-campaigners-a6756506.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220525/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/jehovah-s-witnesses-targeted-under-russia-s-anti-extremism-laws-simply-practising-their-pacifist-faith-say-campaigners-a6756506.html |archive-date=2022-05-25 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=How Jehovah's Witnesses are Being Targeted Under Russia's Anti-Extremism Laws|date=December 1, 2015|website=The Independent}}</ref> In December 2009, the Supreme Court of Russia upheld the ruling of the lower courts which pronounced 34 pieces of Jehovah's Witness literature extremist, such as their magazine '']''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rapsinews.com/news/20140325/271010309.html|title=ECHR looks into Russia's treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses|work=RAPSI|date=25 March 2014 |access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref> The ruling upheld the confiscation of property of Jehovah's Witnesses in Taganrog. In December 2015, a Rostov Regional Court ] of practicing extremism in Taganrog, with five given {{frac|5|1|2}}-year ]s and the remainder were issued fines they were not required to pay.<ref name="beard"/>

In July 2015, the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice added Jehovah's Witnesses' official website to the ], making it a criminal offense to promote the website from within the country and requiring internet providers throughout Russia to block access to the site.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://print.lenizdat.ru/articles/1136259/|language=ru|title=Media: Constitutional Court agreed that site can be considered extremist for the content of one page|date=January 31, 2016}}</ref> In March 2017, the ] reported that Russia's Justice Ministry had suspended the activities of the Administrative Center of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia due to extremist activities.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://tass.com/society/937146|title=Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia suspended over extremism|website=TASS}}</ref> In April 2017, ] on Freedom of Opinion and Expression ], UN Special Rapporteur on Freedoms of Peaceful Assembly and Association ], and UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion and Belief ] condemned Russia's desire to ban Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=http://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2274|title=Forum 18: Russia: Jehovah's Witnesses banned, property confiscated |date= 20 April 2017|website=Forum 18}}</ref>

On April 20, 2017, The ] issued a verdict upholding the claim from the country's Justice Ministry that Jehovah's Witnesses' activity violated laws on "extremism". The ruling liquidated the group's Russian headquarters in ] and all of its 395 local religious organizations, banning their activity and ordering their property to be seized by the state. According to the human rights organization Forum 18, this is the first time a court has ruled a registered national centralized religious organization as "extremist".<ref name="auto"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.un.org/ru/story/2017/04/1302601|title=Эксперты ООН призвали Россию прекратить судебный процесс в отношении организации "Свидетели Иеговы"|date=April 4, 2017|website=Новости ООН}}</ref> Many countries and international organizations have spoken out against Russia's religious abuses of Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www2.stetson.edu/religious-news/170421c.html|title=PDS RUSSIA RELIGION NEWS April 2017|website=www2.stetson.edu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/04/20/russia-court-bans-jehovahs-witnesses|title=Russia: Court Bans Jehovah's Witnesses|date=April 20, 2017|website=Human Rights Watch}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.csce.gov/international-impact/press-and-media/press-releases/helsinki-commission-condemns-pending-legal|title=Helsinki Commission Condemns Pending Legal Action against Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia|date=March 28, 2017|website=CSCE|access-date=May 2, 2017|archive-date=August 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210811074754/https://www.csce.gov/international-impact/press-and-media/press-releases/helsinki-commission-condemns-pending-legal|url-status=dead}}</ref> Leaders of various denominations have also spoken out against Russia's decision to ban the denomination.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.catholicregister.org/home/international/item/25028-russian-catholic-official-criticizes-court-ban-on-jehovah-s-witnesses|title=Russian Catholic official criticizes court ban on Jehovah's Witnesses|first=Jonathan Luxmoore, Catholic News|last=Service|website=www.catholicregister.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/religious-freedom-dying-in-russia-missionary-says/|title=Religious freedom dying in Russia, missionary says &#124; Baptist Press|date=April 28, 2017|website=www.baptistpress.com/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www2.stetson.edu/religious-news/170428b.html|title=PDS RUSSIA RELIGION NEWS April 2017|website=www2.stetson.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www2.stetson.edu/religious-news/170424f.html|title=PDS RUSSIA RELIGION NEWS April 2017|website=www2.stetson.edu}}</ref> An article in '']'' stated, "Russia's decision to ban Jehovah's Witnesses in the country shows the 'paranoia' of Vladimir Putin's government, according to the chair of the ] (USCIRF)."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newsweek.com/jehovahs-witnesses-russia-ban-putin-587179|title=Russia's ban on Jehovah's Witnesses shows the "paranoia" of Vladimir Putin, according to a U.S. commission|first=Jason Le Miere On 4/21/17 at 11:23 AM|last=EDT|date=April 21, 2017|website=Newsweek}}</ref> The ] also expressed deep concern over Russia's treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ushmm.org/information/press/press-releases/museum-statement-on-jehovahs-witnesses-in-russia|title=Museum Statement on Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia – United States Holocaust Memorial Museum|website=www.ushmm.org}}</ref>

In May 2017, armed Federal Security Services (FSB) officers arrested Dennis Christensen, a 46-year-old Danish citizen, at a hall in ] on charges related to extremism.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2018/04/27/russia-crackdown-jehovah-witnesses-begins-with-a-foreigner-a61288|title=Russia's Crackdown on Jehovah's Witnesses Begins With a Foreigner|first=Evan|last=Gershkovich|date=April 27, 2018|website=The Moscow Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/russia/Verdict-for-Dennis-Christensen-Scheduled-for-February-6-2019/|title=Verdict for Dennis Christensen Scheduled for February 6, 2019|website=JW.ORG}}</ref> On February 6, 2019, he was found guilty and sentenced to six years in prison.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/world/europe/russia-jehovah-witnesses.html|title=Russian Court Sentences Jehovah's Witness to 6 Years in Prison|last=Yuhas|first=Alan|date=2019-02-06|work=The New York Times|access-date=2019-02-07|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref>

A 2019 arrest in ] of a Jehovah's Witness has been alleged to involve torture.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-jehovahs-witness-crackdown-surgut-religion-discrimination-a8790761.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220525/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-jehovahs-witness-crackdown-surgut-religion-discrimination-a8790761.html |archive-date=2022-05-25 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=Russia's Jehovah's Witnesses allege '21st-century Inquisition' amid claims of torture|website=]|date=22 February 2019}}</ref>

In February 2021, a Russian court in the ] sentenced 69-year-old Valentina Baranovskaya to two years in prison for taking part in religious activities that have been banned in Russia. She is the first female member of the denomination to be imprisoned in Russia since their activities were banned in 2017. Her 46-year-old son Roman Baranovsky was also sentenced to six years in prison.<ref>{{cite web|date=2021-02-24|title=First Woman Jehovah's Witness Sentenced to Prison in Russia|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/02/24/first-woman-jehovahs-witness-sentenced-to-prison-in-russia-a73057|access-date=2021-06-20|website=The Moscow Times|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Russia Accused of 'New Low' In Jehovah's Witnesses Crackdown After Woman, 69, Jailed|url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-accused-of-new-low-in-jehovah-s-witnesses-crackdown-after-woman-69-jailed/ar-BB1e0IIG|access-date=2021-06-20|website=www.msn.com}}</ref> According to the Watch Tower Society, the Supreme Court denied their appeal on May 24, 2021, and added restrictions to be imposed on them after their release.<ref>{{cite web|title=Brother Roman Baranovskiy and His Mother, Sister Valentina Baranovskaya, Lose Their Appeal|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/russia/Brother-Roman-Baranovskiy-and-His-Mother-Sister-Valentina-Baranovskaya-Lose-Their-Appeal/|access-date=2021-06-20|website=JW.ORG|language=en}}</ref> Commenting on the sentence, the ] tweeted that the sentencing of an elderly woman in poor health marks a "new low in Russia's brutal campaign against religious freedom."<ref>{{cite web|title=Russia Accused of 'New Low' In Jehovah's Witnesses Crackdown After Woman, 69, Jailed|url=https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-accused-of-new-low-in-jehovah-s-witnesses-crackdown-after-woman-69-jailed/ar-BB1e0IIG|access-date=2021-06-21|website=www.msn.com}}</ref>

In October 2022, three Jehovah's Witnesses were sentenced to six years in prison in Sevastopol, a city that belongs to a part of Ukraine annexed by Russia. Although the denomination's activities are legal in Ukraine, the decision was made by "a Moscow-imposed court" that found them guilty of organizing activities for Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Three Jehovah's Witness Get Prison Terms In Russian-Annexed Crimea Amid Crackdown |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-jehovah-s-witnesses-crimea-prison/32068646.html |access-date=2022-10-08 |website=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty |language=en}}</ref>

===Singapore===
{{Main|Jehovah's Witnesses in Singapore}}
In 1972, the ] government de-registered and banned the activities of Jehovah's Witnesses on the grounds that its members refuse to perform military service (which is obligatory for all male citizens), salute ], or swear oaths of allegiance to the state.<ref name="state.gov">{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2001/5732.htm|title=Singapore|work=]|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref><ref>"Singapore", ''International Religious Freedom Report 2004'', ], </ref> Literature published by the denomination was also banned, and a person in possession of the banned literature may be fined up to S$2,000 (US$1,333) and jailed up to 12 months for a first conviction.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2009/127287.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091130031812/http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2009/127287.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=30 November 2009|title=Singapore|work=U.S. Department of State|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref>

In 1994, the ] ruled on the case of '']'', finding that banning the Jehovah's Witnesses did not violate the right to ] guaranteed by ] of the ]. According to the ruling by Chief Justice ], their refusal to perform military service was contrary to public peace, welfare and good order, and laws relating to public order are exceptions to freedom of religion set out in Article 15(4).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://lwb.lawnet.com.sg/legal/lgl/rss/landmark/%5B1994%5D_SGHC_207.html |title=Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v Public Prosecutor |access-date=2021-04-16 |archive-date=2012-10-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121026151735/http://lwb.lawnet.com.sg/legal/lgl/rss/landmark/%5B1994%5D_SGHC_207.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In February 1995, Singapore police raided private homes where group members were holding religious meetings, in an operation codenamed "Operation Hope". Officers seized Bibles, religious literature, documents and computers, and eventually brought charges against 69 Jehovah's Witnesses, many of whom went to jail.<ref name="singapore-window.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.singapore-window.org/80411sm.htm|title=Singapore: Fighting faith of stoic witnesses to repression|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jehovah.com.au/jehovah-articles/1995/2/27/singapore-police-swoop-on-jehovahs-witnesses/|title=Singapore Police Swoop On Jehovah's Witnesses|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref> In March 1995, 74-year-old Yu Nguk Ding was arrested for carrying two "undesirable publications"—one of them a Bible printed by the Watch Tower Society.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chrislydgate.com/webclips/jehovah.htm|title=Fighting faith of stoic witnesses to repression|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref>

In 1996, eighteen Jehovah's Witnesses were convicted for unlawfully meeting in a Singapore apartment and were given sentences from one to four weeks in jail.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1996/january8/6t164b.html|title=Jehovah's Witnesses Jailed in Singapore for Meeting|work=ChristianityToday.com|date=8 January 1996 |access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref> ] Glen How argued that the restrictions against the Jehovah's Witnesses violated their constitutional rights. Then-Chief Justice ] questioned How's sanity, accused him of "living in a cartoon world" and referred to "funny, cranky religious groups" before denying the appeal.<ref name="singapore-window.org"/> In 1998, two Jehovah's Witnesses were charged in a Singapore court for possessing and distributing banned religious publications.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.singapore-window.org/80330up.htm|title=Singapore:Jehovah Witnesses charged in Singapore|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref>

In 1998, a Jehovah's Witness lost a lawsuit against a government school for wrongful dismissal for refusing to sing the ] or salute the flag. In March 1999, the Court of Appeals denied his appeal.<ref name="state.gov"/> In 2000, public secondary schools indefinitely suspended at least fifteen Jehovah's Witness students for refusing to sing the national anthem or participate in the flag ceremony.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2002/13909.htm|title=International Religious Freedom Report 2002: Singapore|work=U.S. Department of State|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref> In April 2001, one public school teacher, also a member of Jehovah's Witnesses, resigned after being threatened with dismissal for refusing to participate in singing the national anthem.<ref name="state.gov"/>

Singapore authorities have seized Jehovah's Witnesses' literature on various occasions from individuals attempting to cross the ]. In thirteen cases, authorities warned the Jehovah's Witnesses but did not press charges.<ref name="ReferenceA"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2003/27788.htm|title=Singapore|work=U.S. Department of State|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2007/90153.htm|title=Singapore|work=U.S. Department of State|date=14 September 2007|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref>

The initial sentence for failure to comply is 15 months' imprisonment, with an additional 24 months for a second refusal. Failure to perform annual military reserve duty, which is required of all those who have completed their initial two-year obligation, results in a 40-day sentence, with a 12-month sentence after four refusals.<ref name="ReferenceB"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108423.htm|title=Singapore|work=U.S. Department of State|date=19 September 2008|access-date=8 August 2015}}</ref>

===South Africa===
Beginning on June 7, 1967, the ] South African government passed the Defense Amendment Bill, making it compulsory for all white males of eligible age to participate in the armed forces.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sahistory.org.za/dated-event/military-service-becomes-compulsory-white-south-african-men|title=Military service becomes compulsory for White South African men. &#124; South African History Online|website=www.sahistory.org.za}}</ref> Conscription brought Jehovah's Witnesses into conflict with the government, and young men who refused military service were sentenced to no less than 12 months at a military detention barracks, with repeat convictions in some cases. According to the Survey of Race Relations in South Africa of 1974, during 1973, 158 Jehovah's Witnesses were sentenced "for refusing on religious grounds to render service or undergo training." In the first half of 1974, 120 Jehovah's Witnesses were sentenced.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Survey of Race Relations 1974|journal=South African Institute of Race Relations}}</ref> Conscription was officially ended in late August 1993. By this time, the Constitution of South Africa had been adjusted to allow for ].

===Soviet Union===
Jehovah's Witnesses did not have a significant presence in the Soviet Union prior to 1939 when the Soviet Union forcibly incorporated eastern Romania, ], and ], each of which had a Jehovah's Witness movement. Although never large in number (estimated by the ] to be 20,000 in 1968), the Jehovah's Witnesses became one of the most persecuted religious groups in the ] during the post-World War II era.<ref>Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, ''The Sword and the Shield'', New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 503, {{ISBN|0-465-00310-9}}</ref> Members were arrested or deported, and some were put in labor camps. Witnesses in ] were deported to ]; members from other regions of the Soviet Union were deported to ].<ref name="polian">]. "Against Their Will: The History and Geography of Forced Migrations in the USSR", Central European University Press, 2004, pp. 169–171, {{ISBN|978-963-9241-68-8}}</ref> KGB officials, who were tasked with dissolving the Jehovah's Witness movement, were disturbed to discover that the Witnesses continued to practice their faith even within the labor camps.<ref>Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, ''The Sword and the Shield'', New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 505, {{ISBN|0-465-00310-9}}</ref>

The Minister of Internal Affairs, ] proposed the deportation of the Jehovah's Witnesses to Stalin in October 1950. A resolution was voted by the Council of Minister and an order was issued by the ] in March 1951. The ] passed a decree "on the confiscation and selling of the property of individuals banished from the territory of the Moldavian SSR", which included the Jehovah's Witnesses.<ref name="polian"/>

In April 1951, over 9,000 Jehovah's Witnesses were deported to ] under a plan called "]".<ref>, by Vitali Kamyshev, "Русская мысль", Париж, N 4363, 26 April 2001 {{in lang|ru}}</ref><ref name=passat>Валерий Пасат ."Трудные страницы истории Молдовы (1940–1950)". Москва: Изд. Terra, 1994 {{in lang|ru}}</ref> The Soviet government was so disturbed by the Jehovah's Witnesses who continued to receive religious literature smuggled from Brooklyn that the KGB was authorized to send agents to infiltrate the Brooklyn headquarters.<ref>Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, ''The Sword and the Shield'', New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 506, {{ISBN|0-465-00310-9}}</ref>

In September 1965, a decree of the Presidium of the ] canceled the "special settlement" restriction of Jehovah's Witnesses, though the decree, signed by ], stated that there would be no compensation for confiscated property. However, Jehovah's Witnesses remained the subject of state persecution due to their ideology being classified as ].<ref name=kphg> ''Prava Lyudini'' ("Rights of a Person"), the newspaper of a Ukrainian ] organization, ], December 2001 {{in lang|ru}}</ref>

===Turkmenistan===
The ] has indicated that Jehovah's Witnesses in Turkmenistan have been prosecuted and imprisoned for refusing to perform compulsory military service, despite Turkmenistan's constitution guaranteeing the right to "practice any religion alone or in association with others" and the right to "freedom of conviction and the free expression of those convictions". The UN committee noted, "The State party should take all necessary measures to review its legislation with a view to providing for alternative military service. The State party should also ensure that the law clearly stipulates that individuals have the right to conscientious objection to military service. Furthermore, the State party should halt all prosecutions of individuals who refuse to perform military service on grounds of conscience and release those individuals who are currently serving prison sentences."<ref name="ohchr- turkmenistan">{{cite web|url=http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/TKM/CO/1&Lang=En|title=Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant – Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee – Turkmenistan|publisher=United Nations Human Rights Office of the high Commissioner – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights|date=19 April 2012|access-date=12 March 2016}}</ref> In May 2021, the Watch Tower Society reported that Turkmenistan has released all Jehovah's Witnesses who had been imprisoned for conscientious objection to military service.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/turkmenistan/Turkmenistan-Releases-16-Brothers-From-Various-Prisons/|publisher=Watch Tower Society|title=Turkmenistan Releases 16 Brothers From Various Prisons|date=May 8, 2021}}</ref>

According to the ], ] of Justice described Jehovah's Witnesses as foreign and dangerous. The US State Department also stated that the Turkmenistan government imposes restrictions on the freedom of Jehovah's Witness parents (and members of various other religious groups) to raise their children in accordance with their religious beliefs. In 2003, Jehovah's Witnesses' religious literature was confiscated, members of the denomination were denied exit visas, and others were stopped after crossing a border and forced to return. In 2004, five Jehovah's Witnesses were stopped and prevented from boarding a flight to another country because their names were included on a "black list" of citizens prohibited from leaving the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2004/35490.htm|title=Turkmenistan: International Religious Freedom Report 2004|date=21 May 2015|website=www.state.gov/|publisher=]|access-date=2016-03-15}}</ref> In 2015, a Jehovah's Witness in Turkmenistan was sentenced to four years in prison for allegedly inciting hatred at a religious meeting held in a private home, and other attendees were fined.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jw.org/en/news/legal/by-region/turkmenistan/no-religious-freedom-bahram/|title=Turkmenistan: Turkmenistan Sentences B. H. to Four-Year Prison Term for Religious Activity|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2063 |title=Turkmenistan: Torture and jail for one 4 year and 14 short-term prisoners of conscience |date=21 May 2015 |publisher=Forum 18 News Service |access-date=2016-03-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-and-central-asia/turkmenistan/report-turkmenistan/|title=Turkmenistan 2015/2016: Freedom of religion
|website=www.amnesty.org|access-date=2016-03-15}}</ref>

===United States===
{{Main|Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States}}

During the 1930s and 1940s, some US states passed laws that made it illegal for Jehovah's Witnesses to distribute their literature, and children of Jehovah's Witnesses in some states were banned from attending ]s.

The persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses for their refusal to salute the flag became known as the "Flag-Salute Cases".<ref>{{harvp|Hall|1992|p=394}}</ref> Their refusal to salute the flag became considered as a test of the liberties for which the flag stands, namely the freedom to worship according to the dictates of one's own conscience. The ] found that the United States, by making the flag salute compulsory in '']'' (1940), was impinging upon the individual's right to worship as one chooses—a violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause in the constitution. However, Justice Frankfurter, speaking on behalf of the 8-to-1 majority view against the Witnesses, stated that the interests of "inculcating patriotism was of sufficient importance to justify a relatively minor infringement on religious belief".<ref name="Hall_395">{{harvp|Hall|1992|p=395}}</ref> The ruling resulted in a wave of persecution. Lillian Gobitas, one of the schoolchildren involved in the decision, said, "It was like open season on Jehovah's Witnesses."<ref>Irons, Peter. ''A People's History of the Supreme Court'' p. 341. New York: Viking Penguin, 1999.</ref>

The ] reported that by the end of 1940, "more than 1,500 Witnesses in the United States had been victimized in 335 separate attacks".<ref>{{harvp|Peters|2000|p=10}}</ref> Such attacks included beatings, being tarred and feathered, hanged, shot, maimed, and even castrated.<ref>{{harvp|Peters|2000|p=8}}</ref> As reports of attacks against Jehovah's Witnesses continued, "several justices changed their minds, and in '']'' (1943), the Court declared that the state could not impinge on the First Amendment by compelling the observance of rituals."<ref name="Hall_395"/>

In 1943, after a drawn-out litigation process by the ] in state courts and lower federal courts, the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials could not force Jehovah's Witnesses and other students to salute the flag and recite the ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Hudson |first=David L. |title=The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book |url=https://archive.org/details/handysupremecour00huds_415 |url-access=limited |publisher=] |year=2008 |location=Canton, Michigan |pages= |isbn=9781578591961}}</ref> In 1946 and 1953 Supreme Court decisions were handed down establishing their right to be exempted from military service.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/329/338.html|title=Gibson v. US|work=Findlaw|access-date=24 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/327/114.html|title=Estep v. United States|work=Findlaw|access-date=24 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/346/389.html|title=Dickinson v. United States|work=Findlaw|access-date=24 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{harvp|Peters|2000|pp=274–276}}</ref>

==Notes==
{{Reflist|group=Note}}

==References==
{{Reflist|32em}}


==See also== ===Bibliography===
{{Refbegin}}
* '']'', a documentary on Jehovah's Witnesses featuring a Jewish concentration camp survivor, Joseph Kempler
*{{cite book |author=Anonymous |year=1980 |chapter=France |title=1980 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses |url=https://www.jw.org/en/library/books/1980-Yearbook-of-Jehovahs-Witnesses/1980-Yearbook-of-Jehovahs-Witnesses/ |chapter-url=https://www.jw.org/en/library/books/1980-Yearbook-of-Jehovahs-Witnesses/France/ |location=Brooklyn, NY |publisher=]}}
*{{cite book|last=Garbe|first=Detlef|year=2008|title=Between Resistance and Martyrdom: Jehovah's Witnesses in the Third Reich|location=Madison, WI|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-299-20794-6}}
*{{cite book|last=Hall|first=Kermit L.|year=1992|title=The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00hall|url-access=registration|location=New York|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-19-505835-2}}
*{{cite book|last=Peters|first=Shawn Francis|year=2000|title=Judging Jehovah's Witnesses: Religious Persecution and the Dawn of the Rights Revolution|url=https://archive.org/details/judgingjehovahsw0000pete|url-access=registration|location=Lawrence, KS|publisher=]}}
{{Refend}}


== Additional reading == ==Further reading==
*''Persecution and Resistance of Jehovah's Witnesses During the Nazi Regime'', edited by Hans Hesse, {{ISBN|3-86108-750-2}}
* , Bernhard Rammerstorfer, Grammaton Press.
* Paul Johnson, '']'', {{ISBN|0-689-10728-5}}
* , Hans Hesse (Ed.), Edition Temmen.
* M. James Penton, ''Apocalypse Delayed: The Story of Jehovah's Witnesses'' (University of Toronto Press, 1985).
* , Simone Arnold Liebster, Grammaton Press.
* {{cite journal|journal=Flinders Journal of History and Politics|author=Jayne Persian|title=A National Nuisance: The Banning of Jehovah's Witnesses in Australia in 1941|year=2008|volume=25|hdl=2328/36649|url=http://hdl.handle.net/2328/36649}}
* , Max Liebster, Grammaton Press.
* ''The Nazi State and the New Religions : Five Case Studies in Non-Conformity'', Christine E. King, Edwin Mellen Press, 1982.
* Detlev Garbe: ''Zwischen Widerstand und Martyrium'', 1999, ISBN 3-486-56404-8
* , M. James Penton, University of Toronto Press, 2004. ISBN 0-8020-8678-0
* Manfred Gebhard: ''Geschichte der Zeugen Jehovas. Mit Schwerpunkt der deutschen Geschichte'', 1999, ISBN 3-8981-1217-9
* Hans Hesse: ''Am mutigsten waren immer wieder die Zeugen Jehovas'', Edition Temmen, 2000, ISBN 3-861-08724-3
* Hans Hesse, Jürgen Harder: ''...und wenn ich lebenslang in einem KZ bleiben müßte... Die Zeuginnen Jehovas in den Frauenkonzentrationslagern Moringen, Lichtenburg und Ravensbrück'', 2001, ISBN 3-88474-935-8
* Michael H. Kater: ''Die Ernsten Bibelforscher im Dritten Reich''; in: Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte 17. Jg. 1969 Heft 2
* ]: ''Nein statt Ja und Amen. ]: Er ging einen anderen Weg'', Linz 1999, ISBN 3-9500718-6-5
* [[A History of Christianity (Paul Johnson)|A History of Christianity
]], Paul Johnson
* Judith Tydor Baumel, Walter Laqueur:"The Holocaust Encyclopedia" ISBN 0300084323


{{Religious persecution}}{{Discrimination}}{{Authority control}}
]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Persecution Of Jehovah's Witnesses}}
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 05:30, 16 December 2024

See also: Jehovah's Witnesses and governments and Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses by country
Part of a series on
Jehovah's Witnesses
Overview
Organizational structure
History
Demographics
Literature
Places
People
Watch Tower presidents
Formative influences
Notable former members
Notable scholars
Criticism
Opposition
Freedom of religion
Concepts
Status by country
Africa
North and South America
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Oceania
Topical
Religious persecution
Religion portal
Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/national
Manifestations
Policies
Countermeasures
Related topics

The beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses have engendered controversy throughout their history. Consequently, the denomination has been opposed by local governments, communities, and religious groups. Many Christian denominations consider the interpretations and doctrines of Jehovah's Witnesses heretical, and some professors of religion have classified the denomination as a cult.

According to law professor Archibald Cox, Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States were "the principal victims of religious persecution … they began to attract attention and provoke repression in the 1930s, when their proselytizing and numbers rapidly increased." At times, political and religious animosity against Jehovah's Witnesses has led to mob action and governmental repression in various countries including the United States, Canada and Nazi Germany.

During World War II, Jehovah's Witnesses were targeted in the United States, Canada, and many other countries because they refused to serve in the military or contribute to the war effort due to their doctrine of political neutrality. In Canada, Jehovah's Witnesses were interned in camps along with political dissidents and people of Japanese descent.

Jehovah's Witness members have been imprisoned in many countries for their refusal of conscription or compulsory military service. Their religious activities are banned or restricted in some countries, including Singapore, China, Vietnam, Russia and many Muslim-majority countries.

Countries

Countries where Jehovah's Witnesses' activities are banned

Australia

In 1930, the Watch Tower Society had controlling interests in several radio stations in Australia, including 5KA, where presenters were told to preach and in 1931 began broadcasting sermons of Joseph Franklin Rutherford. In 1933, the Australian government banned Rutherford's sermons, which included diatribes against the Catholic Church, the British Empire, and the United States. On 8 January 1941, the Watch Tower Society's stations were closed down, being described as dangerous to national security. Jehovah's Witnesses was declared an illegal organization on 17 January 1941, with World War II described as "an ideal opportunity to get rid of licensees long regarded as deviant".

Austria

In the period between 1978 and 2004, Jehovah's Witnesses sought registration as a religious society under the 1874 law, which they were repeatedly prevented from doing by state institutions for various reasons. The ECHR ruled in 2008 that Austria had thus violated Articles 9, 14, 6 and 13 of the Convention on Human Rights.

Benin

During the first presidency of Mathieu Kérékou, activities of Jehovah's Witnesses were banned and members were forced to undergo "demystification training".

Bulgaria

In Bulgaria, Jehovah's Witnesses have been targets of violence by right-wing nationalist groups such as the IMRO – Bulgarian National Movement. On April 17, 2011, a group of about sixty hooded men besieged a Kingdom Hall in Burgas, during the annual memorial of Christ's death. Attackers threw stones, damaged furniture, and injured at least five of the people gathered inside. The incident was recorded by a local television station. Jehovah's Witnesses in Bulgaria have been fined for proselytizing without proper government permits, and some municipalities have legislation prohibiting or restricting their rights to preach.

Canada

Main article: Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Canada

In 1984, Canada released a number of previously classified documents which revealed that in the 1940s, "able bodied young Jehovah's Witnesses" were sent to "camps", and "entire families who practiced the religion were imprisoned". The 1984 report stated, "Recently declassified wartime documents suggest was also a time of officially sanctioned religious bigotry, political intolerance and the suppression of ideas. The federal government described Jehovah's Witnesses as subversive and offensive 'religious zealots' … in secret reports given to special parliamentarian committees in 1942." It concluded that, "probably no other organization is so offensive in its methods, working as it does under the guise of Christianity. The documents prepared by the justice department were presented to a special House of Commons committee by the government of William Lyon Mackenzie King in an attempt to justify the outlawing of the organizations during the second world war."

China

Jehovah's Witnesses' activities in China are considered illegal. Former Canadian-American Jehovah's Witness missionary Amber Scorah recounted the lengths that she and her husband went through to preach illegally in China in the early 2000s. She describes how local Jehovah's Witnesses were forced to meet secretly in a different location every week, with invites by word-of-mouth only. She also describes how they would vet potential converts to make sure they had no Communist ties or leanings.

Cuba

See also: Military Units to Aid Production and Human rights in Cuba

Under Fidel Castro's communist regime, Jehovah's Witnesses were included among groups considered to be "social deviants" and were sent to forced labor concentration camps to be "reeducated". On July 1, 1974 the group was officially banned and their places of worship closed. Following the ban, members who refused military service were imprisoned for three years; it was reported that members were also imprisoned because of their children's refusal to salute the flag.

Eritrea

In Eritrea, the government stripped Jehovah's Witnesses of their civil and political rights in 1994 after their refusal to engage in voting and military service. Members of all ages have been arrested for participating in religious meetings. On 24 September 1994, three members were arrested and imprisoned without trial. International rights groups are aware of the situation of Jehovah's Witnesses in Eritrea and have repeatedly called for Eritrean authorities to end the persecution.

As of July 2016, 55 members were imprisoned. According to the Watch Tower Society, 28 members were released on December 4, 2020, and another four were released in early 2021.

France

See also: Jehovah's Witnesses and governments (France)

Prior to World War II, the French government banned the Association of Jehovah's Witnesses in France, and ordered that the French offices of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society be vacated. After the war, Jehovah's Witnesses in France renewed their operations. In December 1952, France's Minister of the Interior banned The Watchtower magazine, citing its position on military service. The ban was lifted on November 26, 1974.

In the 1990s and 2000s, the French government included Jehovah's Witnesses on its list of "cults", and governmental ministers made derogatory public statements about Jehovah's Witnesses. Despite a century of activity in the country, France's Ministry of Finance opposed official recognition of the denomination; it was not until June 23, 2000 that France's highest administrative court, the Council of State, ruled that Jehovah's Witnesses qualify as a religion under French law. France's Ministry of the Interior sought to collect 60% of donations made to the denomination's entities; Witnesses called the taxation "confiscatory" and appealed to the European Court of Human Rights. On June 30, 2011, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that France's actions violated the religious freedom of Jehovah's Witnesses.

Jehovah's Witnesses in France have reported hundreds of criminal attacks against their adherents and places of worship.

French dependencies

During the ban of The Watchtower in France, publication of the magazine continued in various French territories. In French Polynesia, the magazine was covertly published under the name, La Sentinelle, though it was later learned that The Watchtower had not been banned locally. In Réunion, the magazine was published under the name, Bulletin intérieur.

Georgia

In 1996, a year after Georgia adopted its post-USSR Constitution, the country's Ministry of Internal Affairs began a campaign to confiscate religious literature belonging to Jehovah's Witnesses. Individual Witnesses fled Georgia seeking religious refugee status in other nations. Government officials refused permits for Jehovah's Witnesses to organize assemblies, and law enforcement officials dispersed legal assemblies. In September 2000, "Georgian police and security officials fired blank anti-tank shells and used force to disperse an outdoor gathering of some 700 Jehovah's Witnesses in the town of Natuliki in northwestern Georgia on 8 September, AP and Caucasus Press reported." In 2002, prosecution of a priest who instigated violence against Jehovah's Witness members was impeded by a lack of cooperation by government and law enforcement.

In 2004, Forum 18 referred to the period since 1999 as a "five-year reign of terror" against Jehovah's Witnesses and other religious minorities. Amnesty International noted: "Jehovah's Witnesses have frequently been a target for violence … in Georgia … In many of the incidents police are said to have failed to protect the believers, or even to have participated in physical and verbal abuse."

On May 3, 2007, the European Court of Human Rights ruled against the government of Georgia for its toleration of religious violence toward Jehovah's Witnesses and ordered the victims be compensated for moral damages and legal costs. On October 7, 2014, the European Court of Human Rights, giving its judgement concerning violence against Jehovah's Witnesses in Georgia in the years 2000–2001, unanimously held that Georgia's state officials, in violation of Articles 3, 9 & 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, had either directly participated in those attacks or had tolerated violence by private individuals against members of the religious group.

South Ossetia

In July 2017, the Supreme Court of South Ossetia ruled that Jehovah's Witnesses were an extreme organization. The court declared a penalty of ten years' imprisonment for "any religious activities such as assembly and distributing literature".

Germany

Main article: Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Nazi Germany

During 1931 and 1932, more than 2000 legal actions were instigated against Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany and members of the group were dismissed from employment. Persecution intensified following Adolf Hitler's appointment as chancellor in 1933 and continued until 1945. A "Declaration of Facts" was issued at a Jehovah's Witness convention in Berlin on June 25, 1933, asserting the group's political neutrality and calling for an end to government opposition. More than 2.1 million copies of the statement were distributed throughout Germany, but its distribution prompted a new wave of persecution against members of the denomination in Germany, whose refusal to give the Nazi salute, join Nazi organizations or perform military service demonstrated their opposition to the totalitarian ideology of National Socialism.

On October 4, 1934, congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany sent telegrams of protest and warning to Hitler. The Watch Tower Society reported that according to Karl R. A. Wittig, a government officer in Germany at the time, Hitler was shown a number of telegrams protesting the Third Reich's persecution of the Bible Students. Wittig reported: "Hitler jumped to his feet and with clenched fists hysterically screamed: 'This brood will be exterminated in Germany!' Four years after this discussion I was able, by my own observations, to convince myself … that Hitler's outburst of anger was not just an idle threat. No other group of prisoners of the named concentration-camps was exposed to the sadism of the SS-soldiery in such a fashion as the Bible Students were. It was a sadism marked by an unending chain of physical and mental tortures, the likes of which no language in the world can express."

About 10,000 Witnesses were imprisoned, including 2000 sent to concentration camps, where they were identified by purple triangles; as many as 1200 died, including 250 who were executed. From 1935 Gestapo officers offered members a document to sign indicating renouncement of their faith, submission to state authority, and support of the German military. Historian Detlef Garbe says a "relatively high number" of people signed the statement before the war, but "extremely low numbers" of Bible Student prisoners did so in concentration camps in later years.

After a short, unstable period after WWII, the Witnesses continued to suffer severe persecution in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). The Potsdam Agreement of 1945 guaranteed religious freedom and respect for organizations, which also applied to East Germany. When the GDR was established in 1949, the Constitution of East Germany included similar guarantees for the practice of religion. However it became clear that these promises were symbolic and had little impact on the ruling authorities' policies. The government restricted the activities of the Protestant and Catholic Churches and banned several smaller religious groups. The Jehovah's Witnesses were subject to the harshest and most prolonged persecution. According to the official Jehovah's Witnesses webpage,

"Congregation meetings were again broken up by the police. Literature was confiscated. Roads were blockaded to prevent the Witnesses from attending a convention. Brothers were arrested. On August 31, 1950, an official ban was imposed. The Witnesses in East Germany were again forced underground, this time by a Communist regime, not to emerge until almost 40 years later."

According to Mike Dennis, the main agent of "control surveillance and persecution was the Ministry of State Security, popularly known as the Stasi." Its "mission was to serve as the shield and sword of the SED and to protect the socialist system and the East German state from internal and external threats, especially by uncovering and forestalling 'the hostile plans of the aggressive imperialists and their helpers." The Jehovah's Witness website says that in total almost 5,000 Witnesses were imprisoned in 231 places. Hans-Hermann Dirksen mentions that there were many reasons why this group was persecuted, but primarily because the German Democratic Republic saw their religious activities as "detrimental to their political activities." Because the group remained neutral, the SED saw the group as "dangerous and among the enemies of socialism." Trials were conducted against the Witnesses because their activities "were deemed as unconstitutional and their investigations proved they were disguised as espionage." The Stasi then proceeded to use new methods to create insecurity within the organization by infiltrating the group in the 1960s. Another reason they were persecuted was because the organization's headquarters were in the United States, an enemy of the GDR. The organization remained faithful and continued its service throughout the decades of persecution. It was their "solidarity as a community which enabled them to withstand, often with great stoicism, decomposition and liquidation measures."


Despite more than a century of conspicuous activity in the country, Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany were not granted legal recognition until March 25, 2005, in Berlin; in 2006 Germany's Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig extended the local decision to apply nationwide.

India

Jehovah's Witnesses' Office of Public Information has documented a number of mob attacks in India. It states that these instances of violence "reveal the country's hostility toward its own citizens who are Christians." There have been reports that police assist mob attacks on Jehovah's Witnesses or lay charges against the Witnesses while failing to charge other participants involved.

In Davangere on December 20, 2010 a mob confronted two female Witnesses. The mob broke into the home of one of the Witnesses where they had taken refuge. Property was damaged and one of the Witnesses was assaulted. When the police arrived, the Witnesses were arrested and charged with blasphemy. In another incident on December 6, 2011, three Witnesses were attacked by a mob in Madikeri. The male Witness "was kicked and pummeled by the mob" and then dragged towards a nearby temple; while making lewd remarks, the mob "tried to tear the clothes off of the female Witnesses". According to the Watch Tower Society, the police "took the three Witnesses to the police station and filed charges against them rather than the mob". During a July 2012 incident, a group of fifteen men assaulted four Witnesses in Madikeri. The group was taken to a police station and charged with "insulting the religion or religious beliefs of another class" before being released on bail.

In October 2023, a bomb blast at a Jehovah's Witnesses annual convention in Kerala killed 7 people and injured 50 others. The suspect claimed to be a disillusioned member of the Jehovah's Witnesses, and said he resented the Witnesses' anti-national doctrines.

Kazakhstan

Jehovah's Witnesses' activities in Kazakhstan were banned until 1997. After the ban was lifted, members continued to experience police disruption and imprisonment. Their activities are currently registered only in some regions of Kazakhstan, and the Watch Tower Society reports that the use of their literature is restricted.

Malawi

In 1967, thousands of Jehovah's Witnesses in Malawi were beaten and killed, houses and gathering places where burned along with their bibles and publications by police and citizens for refusing to purchase a card indicating endorsement of the Malawi Congress Party. While their political neutrality during the time of the old Colonial government was seen as an act of resistance, their continued non-involvement with the new independent government was viewed as treasonous. The organization was declared illegal and foreign members in the country were expelled. Persecution, both economic and physical, intensified after a September 1972 Malawi Congress Party meeting which stated that "all Witnesses should be dismissed from their employment; any firm that failed to comply would have its license cancelled". By November 1973, 21,000 Jehovah's Witnesses had fled to neighboring Zambia. In 1993, during the transition to a multiparty system and a change in leadership, the government's ban on the organization was lifted.

Russia

Main article: Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia

In 2004, the Moscow City Court banned the activities of Jehovah's Witnesses in Moscow and their legal entity was liquidated. Russian anti-extremism laws were extended to non-violent groups in 2007 and Jehovah's Witnesses were banned in the port city of Taganrog in 2009 after a local court ruled that the organization was guilty of inciting religious hatred by "propagating the exclusivity and supremacy" of their religious beliefs. In December 2009, the Supreme Court of Russia upheld the ruling of the lower courts which pronounced 34 pieces of Jehovah's Witness literature extremist, such as their magazine The Watchtower. The ruling upheld the confiscation of property of Jehovah's Witnesses in Taganrog. In December 2015, a Rostov Regional Court convicted 16 Jehovah's Witnesses of practicing extremism in Taganrog, with five given 5+1⁄2-year suspended sentences and the remainder were issued fines they were not required to pay.

In July 2015, the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice added Jehovah's Witnesses' official website to the Federal List of Extremist Materials, making it a criminal offense to promote the website from within the country and requiring internet providers throughout Russia to block access to the site. In March 2017, the Russian News Agency TASS reported that Russia's Justice Ministry had suspended the activities of the Administrative Center of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia due to extremist activities. In April 2017, UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression David Kaye, UN Special Rapporteur on Freedoms of Peaceful Assembly and Association Maina Kiai, and UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion and Belief Ahmed Shaheed condemned Russia's desire to ban Jehovah's Witnesses.

On April 20, 2017, The Supreme Court of Russia issued a verdict upholding the claim from the country's Justice Ministry that Jehovah's Witnesses' activity violated laws on "extremism". The ruling liquidated the group's Russian headquarters in Saint Petersburg and all of its 395 local religious organizations, banning their activity and ordering their property to be seized by the state. According to the human rights organization Forum 18, this is the first time a court has ruled a registered national centralized religious organization as "extremist". Many countries and international organizations have spoken out against Russia's religious abuses of Jehovah's Witnesses. Leaders of various denominations have also spoken out against Russia's decision to ban the denomination. An article in Newsweek stated, "Russia's decision to ban Jehovah's Witnesses in the country shows the 'paranoia' of Vladimir Putin's government, according to the chair of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF)." The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum also expressed deep concern over Russia's treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.

In May 2017, armed Federal Security Services (FSB) officers arrested Dennis Christensen, a 46-year-old Danish citizen, at a hall in Oryol on charges related to extremism. On February 6, 2019, he was found guilty and sentenced to six years in prison.

A 2019 arrest in Surgut of a Jehovah's Witness has been alleged to involve torture.

In February 2021, a Russian court in the Republic of Khakassia sentenced 69-year-old Valentina Baranovskaya to two years in prison for taking part in religious activities that have been banned in Russia. She is the first female member of the denomination to be imprisoned in Russia since their activities were banned in 2017. Her 46-year-old son Roman Baranovsky was also sentenced to six years in prison. According to the Watch Tower Society, the Supreme Court denied their appeal on May 24, 2021, and added restrictions to be imposed on them after their release. Commenting on the sentence, the USCIRF tweeted that the sentencing of an elderly woman in poor health marks a "new low in Russia's brutal campaign against religious freedom."

In October 2022, three Jehovah's Witnesses were sentenced to six years in prison in Sevastopol, a city that belongs to a part of Ukraine annexed by Russia. Although the denomination's activities are legal in Ukraine, the decision was made by "a Moscow-imposed court" that found them guilty of organizing activities for Jehovah's Witnesses.

Singapore

Main article: Jehovah's Witnesses in Singapore

In 1972, the Singapore government de-registered and banned the activities of Jehovah's Witnesses on the grounds that its members refuse to perform military service (which is obligatory for all male citizens), salute the flag, or swear oaths of allegiance to the state. Literature published by the denomination was also banned, and a person in possession of the banned literature may be fined up to S$2,000 (US$1,333) and jailed up to 12 months for a first conviction.

In 1994, the High Court of Singapore ruled on the case of Chan Hiang Leng Colin v Public Prosecutor, finding that banning the Jehovah's Witnesses did not violate the right to freedom of religion guaranteed by Article 15(1) of the Constitution of Singapore. According to the ruling by Chief Justice Yong Pung How, their refusal to perform military service was contrary to public peace, welfare and good order, and laws relating to public order are exceptions to freedom of religion set out in Article 15(4).

In February 1995, Singapore police raided private homes where group members were holding religious meetings, in an operation codenamed "Operation Hope". Officers seized Bibles, religious literature, documents and computers, and eventually brought charges against 69 Jehovah's Witnesses, many of whom went to jail. In March 1995, 74-year-old Yu Nguk Ding was arrested for carrying two "undesirable publications"—one of them a Bible printed by the Watch Tower Society.

In 1996, eighteen Jehovah's Witnesses were convicted for unlawfully meeting in a Singapore apartment and were given sentences from one to four weeks in jail. Canadian Queen's Counsel Glen How argued that the restrictions against the Jehovah's Witnesses violated their constitutional rights. Then-Chief Justice Yong Pung How questioned How's sanity, accused him of "living in a cartoon world" and referred to "funny, cranky religious groups" before denying the appeal. In 1998, two Jehovah's Witnesses were charged in a Singapore court for possessing and distributing banned religious publications.

In 1998, a Jehovah's Witness lost a lawsuit against a government school for wrongful dismissal for refusing to sing the national anthem or salute the flag. In March 1999, the Court of Appeals denied his appeal. In 2000, public secondary schools indefinitely suspended at least fifteen Jehovah's Witness students for refusing to sing the national anthem or participate in the flag ceremony. In April 2001, one public school teacher, also a member of Jehovah's Witnesses, resigned after being threatened with dismissal for refusing to participate in singing the national anthem.

Singapore authorities have seized Jehovah's Witnesses' literature on various occasions from individuals attempting to cross the Malaysia–Singapore border. In thirteen cases, authorities warned the Jehovah's Witnesses but did not press charges.

The initial sentence for failure to comply is 15 months' imprisonment, with an additional 24 months for a second refusal. Failure to perform annual military reserve duty, which is required of all those who have completed their initial two-year obligation, results in a 40-day sentence, with a 12-month sentence after four refusals.

South Africa

Beginning on June 7, 1967, the apartheid South African government passed the Defense Amendment Bill, making it compulsory for all white males of eligible age to participate in the armed forces. Conscription brought Jehovah's Witnesses into conflict with the government, and young men who refused military service were sentenced to no less than 12 months at a military detention barracks, with repeat convictions in some cases. According to the Survey of Race Relations in South Africa of 1974, during 1973, 158 Jehovah's Witnesses were sentenced "for refusing on religious grounds to render service or undergo training." In the first half of 1974, 120 Jehovah's Witnesses were sentenced. Conscription was officially ended in late August 1993. By this time, the Constitution of South Africa had been adjusted to allow for alternative civilian service instead of military service.

Soviet Union

Jehovah's Witnesses did not have a significant presence in the Soviet Union prior to 1939 when the Soviet Union forcibly incorporated eastern Romania, Moldavia, and Lithuania, each of which had a Jehovah's Witness movement. Although never large in number (estimated by the KGB to be 20,000 in 1968), the Jehovah's Witnesses became one of the most persecuted religious groups in the Soviet Union during the post-World War II era. Members were arrested or deported, and some were put in labor camps. Witnesses in Moldavian SSR were deported to Tomsk Oblast; members from other regions of the Soviet Union were deported to Irkutsk Oblast. KGB officials, who were tasked with dissolving the Jehovah's Witness movement, were disturbed to discover that the Witnesses continued to practice their faith even within the labor camps.

The Minister of Internal Affairs, Viktor Semyonovich Abakumov proposed the deportation of the Jehovah's Witnesses to Stalin in October 1950. A resolution was voted by the Council of Minister and an order was issued by the Ministry for State Security in March 1951. The Moldavian SSR passed a decree "on the confiscation and selling of the property of individuals banished from the territory of the Moldavian SSR", which included the Jehovah's Witnesses.

In April 1951, over 9,000 Jehovah's Witnesses were deported to Siberia under a plan called "Operation North". The Soviet government was so disturbed by the Jehovah's Witnesses who continued to receive religious literature smuggled from Brooklyn that the KGB was authorized to send agents to infiltrate the Brooklyn headquarters.

In September 1965, a decree of the Presidium of the USSR Council of Ministers canceled the "special settlement" restriction of Jehovah's Witnesses, though the decree, signed by Anastas Mikoyan, stated that there would be no compensation for confiscated property. However, Jehovah's Witnesses remained the subject of state persecution due to their ideology being classified as anti-Soviet.

Turkmenistan

The United Nations Human Rights Committee has indicated that Jehovah's Witnesses in Turkmenistan have been prosecuted and imprisoned for refusing to perform compulsory military service, despite Turkmenistan's constitution guaranteeing the right to "practice any religion alone or in association with others" and the right to "freedom of conviction and the free expression of those convictions". The UN committee noted, "The State party should take all necessary measures to review its legislation with a view to providing for alternative military service. The State party should also ensure that the law clearly stipulates that individuals have the right to conscientious objection to military service. Furthermore, the State party should halt all prosecutions of individuals who refuse to perform military service on grounds of conscience and release those individuals who are currently serving prison sentences." In May 2021, the Watch Tower Society reported that Turkmenistan has released all Jehovah's Witnesses who had been imprisoned for conscientious objection to military service.

According to the US Department of State, Turkmenistan's Ministry of Justice described Jehovah's Witnesses as foreign and dangerous. The US State Department also stated that the Turkmenistan government imposes restrictions on the freedom of Jehovah's Witness parents (and members of various other religious groups) to raise their children in accordance with their religious beliefs. In 2003, Jehovah's Witnesses' religious literature was confiscated, members of the denomination were denied exit visas, and others were stopped after crossing a border and forced to return. In 2004, five Jehovah's Witnesses were stopped and prevented from boarding a flight to another country because their names were included on a "black list" of citizens prohibited from leaving the country. In 2015, a Jehovah's Witness in Turkmenistan was sentenced to four years in prison for allegedly inciting hatred at a religious meeting held in a private home, and other attendees were fined.

United States

Main article: Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States

During the 1930s and 1940s, some US states passed laws that made it illegal for Jehovah's Witnesses to distribute their literature, and children of Jehovah's Witnesses in some states were banned from attending state schools.

The persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses for their refusal to salute the flag became known as the "Flag-Salute Cases". Their refusal to salute the flag became considered as a test of the liberties for which the flag stands, namely the freedom to worship according to the dictates of one's own conscience. The Supreme Court found that the United States, by making the flag salute compulsory in Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940), was impinging upon the individual's right to worship as one chooses—a violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause in the constitution. However, Justice Frankfurter, speaking on behalf of the 8-to-1 majority view against the Witnesses, stated that the interests of "inculcating patriotism was of sufficient importance to justify a relatively minor infringement on religious belief". The ruling resulted in a wave of persecution. Lillian Gobitas, one of the schoolchildren involved in the decision, said, "It was like open season on Jehovah's Witnesses."

The American Civil Liberties Union reported that by the end of 1940, "more than 1,500 Witnesses in the United States had been victimized in 335 separate attacks". Such attacks included beatings, being tarred and feathered, hanged, shot, maimed, and even castrated. As reports of attacks against Jehovah's Witnesses continued, "several justices changed their minds, and in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the Court declared that the state could not impinge on the First Amendment by compelling the observance of rituals."

In 1943, after a drawn-out litigation process by the Watch Tower Society in state courts and lower federal courts, the Supreme Court ruled that public school officials could not force Jehovah's Witnesses and other students to salute the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. In 1946 and 1953 Supreme Court decisions were handed down establishing their right to be exempted from military service.

Notes

  1. "The Organization is Banned In mid-October 1939, about six weeks after the beginning of the war, the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses was banned in France."
  2. " Government has a stated policy of monitoring potentially 'dangerous' cult activity through the Inter-ministerial Monitoring Mission against Sectarian Abuses (MIVILUDES). … In 1997 the special prison at Strasbourg for Jehovah's Witnesses for refusing conscription was still active. In January 2005, MIVILUDES published a guide for public servants instructing them how to spot and combat 'dangerous' sects. … The Jehovah's Witnesses were mentioned"
  3. "Jehovah's Witnesses awaited a ruling by the ECHR on the admissibility of a case contesting the government's assessment of their donations at a 60 percent tax rate. The government had imposed the high rate relative to other religious groups after ruling the group to be a harmful cult. If the assessed tax, which totaled more than 57 million euros (approximately $77.5 million) as of year's end, were to be paid, it would consume all of the group's buildings and assets in the country."
  4. "France's highest court of appeal, the Cour de cassation, has handed down its decision in a case between the Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah, a not-for-profit religious association used by Jehovah's Witnesses in France, and the national tax department, the Direction des services fiscaux. Following a tax inspection lasting 18 months, the tax department established that Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah, whose sole revenue consists of religious donations by its adherents, was run in a completely benevolent fashion, and that its activities were not commercial or for profit. Nevertheless, the tax department levied a 60-percent tax on the religious donations made over a period of four years, between 1993 and 1996. … This is the first time in their 100-year existence in France that Jehovah's Witnesses have been taxed in this manner. … Furthermore, this tax has not been imposed on any other religious organization in France. The Association Les Témoins de Jéhovah has decided to institute proceedings against this confiscatory taxation before the European Court of Human Rights."
  5. "According to representatives for the Jehovah's Witnesses community, there were 65 acts of vandalism against the group in the country through December including Molotov cocktails aimed at Jehovah's Witnesses' property. … According to the leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses community in the country, there were 98 acts against individuals for 2006 and 115 acts in 2007."
  6. "A Berlin court ruled on Thursday that Jehovah's Witnesses are entitled to the same privileges enjoyed by Germany's major Catholic and Protestant churches, ending a 15-year legal fight about the group's status."

References

  1. Hoekema, Anthony A. (1963), The Four Major Cults, Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans, pp. 1–8, 223–371, 373–388, ISBN 0-8028-3117-6
  2. Rhodes, Ron (2001), The Challenge of the Cults and New Religions, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, pp. 77–103, ISBN 0-310-23217-1
  3. Cox, Archibald (1987). The Court and the Constitution. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co. p. 189. ISBN 0-395-48071-X.
  4. ^ Yaffee, Barbara (9 September 1984). "Witnesses Seek Apology for Wartime Persecution". The Globe and Mail. p. 4.
  5. Morton, Jason; Bakken, Keely; Omer, Mohy; Greenwalt, Patrick (2020). "The Global Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses" (PDF). United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.
  6. ^ Bridget Griffen-Foley, "Radio Ministries: Religion on Australian Commercial Radio from the 1920s to the 1960s," Journal of Religious History (2008) 32#1 pp: 31–54. online
  7. "Case of Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria". HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights (hudoc.echr.coe.int). Retrieved 2024-03-02.
  8. Lamb, David (2011). The Africans. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 109. ISBN 9780307797926.
  9. "Свидетели на Йехова – официален уебсайт: jw.org". JW.ORG. Archived from the original on 9 December 2012. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  10. Jehovah's Witnesses persecution 17-04-2011 commemoration in Bulgaria. YouTube. 18 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2021-12-22. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  11. "Brawl between Bulgarian Nationalists, Jehovah Witnesses Injures 5". The Journal of Turkish Weekly. Archived from the original on 2011-04-26. Retrieved 2011-04-29.
  12. "Bulgaria". Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Archived from the original on 23 November 2010. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  13. "Secret Files Reveal Bigotry, Suppression". The Globe and Mail. 4 September 1984.
  14. "June 5, 2019 episode transcript | CBC Radio".
  15. Scorah, Amber (2019). Leaving the Witness. Viking. ISBN 9780735222540.
  16. Tremonti, Anna Maria (5 June 2019). "Former Jehovah's Witness says she was turned away from the religion for having doubts". The Current. CBC Radio. June 5, 2019 episode transcript. Retrieved 13 November 2019. You're basically trying to discern whether the person had any connections to the Chinese Communist Party or the government or any family members who were potentially people that would turn you in for the preaching work that you were doing.
  17. Scorah, Amber (1 February 2013). "Leaving the Witness: A Preacher Finds Freedom to Think in Totalitarian China". The Believer. Illustration by Tony Millionaire. Retrieved 13 November 2019. Anyone who was a party member posed a potential danger, and contact was to be cut off immediately; a party member might turn in a Witness out of loyalty to the regime.
  18. Philip Brenner; Marguerite Rose Jiménez; John M. Kirk; William M. LeoGrande. A contemporary Cuba reader.
  19. Calzon, Frank (December 1, 1976). "Report: Jehovah's Witnesses in Cuba" (PDF). Worldview Magazine. 19 (12 ed.). Carnegie Council. Retrieved 9 August 2015.
  20. "Eritrea: Torture fears for 28 Jehovah's Witnesses arrested, including 90-year-old man". Amnesty International UK. 19 February 2004. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  21. Fisher, Jonah (17 September 2004). "Religious persecution in Eritrea". BBC News. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  22. Plaut, Martin (28 June 2007). "Christians protest over Eritrea". BBC News. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  23. "Imprisoned for Their Faith". Watch Tower Society.
  24. "Eritrea - No Progress on Key Human Rights Concerns". Amnesty International Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review. Amnesty International. January–February 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  25. "Eritrea" (PDF). uscirf.gov. Retrieved 26 September 2023.
  26. ^ "Twenty Years of Imprisonment in Eritrea—Will It Ever End?". 24 September 2014.
  27. Hendricks III, Robert J. (July–August 2010). "Aliens for Their Faith". Liberty Magazine. North American Division of Seventh-day Adventists. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  28. "Eritrea" (PDF). USCIRF Annual Report 2014. United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. 2014. pp. 54–57. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  29. 2017 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses. Watch Tower Society. p. 32.
  30. "Eritrea Releases 28 Jehovah's Witnesses From Prison". Watch Tower Society.
  31. "Eritrea Releases 28 Jehovah's Witnesses From Prison". Watch Tower Society.
  32. "Eritrean Authorities Release Three More Jehovah's Witnesses Imprisoned for Their Faith". Watch Tower Society.
  33. Anonymous (1980), pp. 87–89
  34. Anonymous (1980), p. 128
  35. 1976 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses
  36. "Announcements", Our Kingdom Ministry, February 1975, page 3
  37. "France: International Religious Freedom Report 2006", U.S. Department of State, As Retrieved 2009-08-19
  38. "Highest administrative court in France rules that Jehovah's Witnesses are a religion", News release June 23, 2000, Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses, As Retrieved 2009-08-19 Archived 2008-10-11 at the Wayback Machine
  39. ^ "France: International Religious Freedom Report 2008", U.S. Department of State, As Retrieved 2009-08-19
  40. "French High Court confirms 60-percent confiscatory tax measure on religious donations", News release October 6, 2004, Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses, As Retrieved 2009-08-19 Archived 2008-05-18 at the Wayback Machine
  41. "Euro Court backs Jehovah's Witnesses against France". Archived from the original on 2011-09-28. Retrieved 2011-07-03.
  42. 2005 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses. pp. 88–89.
  43. 2007 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, p. 255
  44. Parliament of Georgia website, As Retrieved 2009-08-26, "The Constitution of Georgia – Adopted on 24 August 1995"
  45. "Jehovah's Witnesses in Georgia: Chronology of Acts of Violence and Intimidation", Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses, As Retrieved 2009-08-26 Archived 2008-11-20 at the Wayback Machine
  46. "Georgia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices", Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, February 23, 2000, As Retrieved 2009-08-26
  47. T. L. v. Ministry of Internal Affairs, V SA 1969/95, Poland: High Administrative Court, 17 September 1996, As Retrieved 2009-08-26, "On 12 May 1995 during the "status interview" conducted by the officer of the Ministry of Internal Affairs' Office the applicant declared additionally that, among others, she could not return to the country, because since 1989 she had been the Jehovah Witness (sic) and she feared that she could be arrested for that reason."
  48. Encyclopedia.com, As Retrieved 2009-08-26
  49. Felix Corley (February 7, 2002). "Georgia: Intimidation Sabotages Trial of Violent Priest". Keston News Service. Oxford, UK: Keston Institute. as cited by Eurasianet.org, As Retrieved 2009-08-26, " does not believe judge Chkheidze did enough. "He should have done more to protect the security of participants. Five policemen were present but left the courtroom before the hearing started. We don't know why. Maybe they were instructed to do so." In a statement issued after the trial, the Jehovah's Witnesses reported that about three hundred of Mkalavishvili's supporters, mostly men, armed with metal and wooden crosses, tried to invade the courtroom before the hearing began. "Many entered and occupied areas reserved for attorneys as they rang their religious bell and waved large anti-Jehovah's Witness banners. As the victims' attorneys made their way through the mob to Judge Ioseb Chkheidze's chambers, they overheard security police being ordered away from the scene. The courtroom was left with no security." Attorneys explained to Chkheidze that under these circumstances it was impossible to proceed with the trial as it was too dangerous for the victims or their attorneys to attend."
  50. "Georgia: Will violent attackers of religious minorities be punished?" by Felix Corley, F18News, Forum 18 News Service, published 16 August 2004, As Retrieved 2009-08-26
  51. AmnestyUSA.org, As Retrieved 2009-08-26 Archived 2009-06-25 at the Wayback Machine
  52. "Chronological List of Judgments and Published Decisions", European Court of Human Rights,As Retrieved 2009-08-26, p. 203 of 285, May 3, 2007, Listing "7148 3.5.2007 Membres de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani et autres c. Géorgie/Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no/no. 71156/01 (Sect. 2), CEDH/ECHR 2007-V"
  53. As Retrieved 2009-08-26, pp. 13–14 (of 53)
  54. "European Court rules against Georgia's campaign of terror", Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses, As Retrieved 2009-08-26 Archived 2009-07-25 at the Wayback Machine
  55. "Georgia: Authorities ineffective in preventing and stopping anti-Jehovah's Witnesses violence". EHRC October 7, 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2016.
  56. Morrison, Thea (17 October 2017). "Occupied S. Ossetia Bans Jehovah's Witnesses as 'Extremist'". Georgia Today on the Web. Archived from the original on 23 November 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  57. Udodiong, Inemesit (18 October 2017). "Can you believe another city has labelled Jehovah"s Witnesses as an extremist group?". Pulse.ng. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  58. "Firm in Faith Despite Opposition", The Watchtower, June 15, 1967, pp. 366–367.
  59. "Germany", 1974 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, pp. 116–117
  60. Penton, M.J. (1997). Apocalypse Delayed. University of Toronto Press. pp. 147–149. ISBN 9780802079732.
  61. Garbe (2008), pp. 512–524
  62. "Foreign Activities Under Fascist-Nazi Persecution", The Watchtower, August 1, 1955, p. 462.
  63. "Germany", 1974 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, p. 138.
  64. Garbe (2008), p. 484
  65. "Jehovah's Witnesses". Holocaust Teacher Resource Center. Retrieved 2022-04-20.
  66. Garbe (2008), pp. 286–291
  67. "Berlin (Potsdam) Conference, 1945 Report" (PDF). Library of Potsdam Conference. Retrieved December 8, 2024.
  68. Veen, Hans-Joachim (January 1, 2000). Lexikon Opposition und Widerstand in der SED-Diktatur (German ed.). Propyläen. ISBN 3549071256.
  69. ^ "Germany". 1999 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses: 78–80. 1999 – via Watchtower Online Library.
  70. Dennis, Mike (June 2006). "Surviving the Stasi: Jehovah's Witnesses in Communist East Germany, 1965 to 1989". Religion, State & Society. 34 (2): 145–168. doi:10.1080/09637490600624725.
  71. ^ Dirksen, Hans-Hermann (June 2006). "'All Over the World Jehovah's Witnesses are the Touchstone for the Existence of True Democracy': Persecution of a Religious Minority in the German Democratic Republic". Religion, State & Society. 34 (2): 127–143. doi:10.1080/09637490600624808.
  72. "Jehovah's Witnesses Granted Legal Status", Deutsche Welle, March 25, 2005, http://www.dw-world.de/popups/popup_printcontent/0,,1530197,00.html Archived 2011-02-18 at the Wayback Machine As Retrieved 2009-08-26, As Retrieved 2009-08-26
  73. "Jehovah's Witnesses: February 27, 2006 News Release". www.jw-media.org. Archived from the original on 2009-11-05. Retrieved 2024-12-16.
  74. "Legal & Human Rights Facts: Jehovah's Witnesses in India". JW.ORG. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  75. "यहोवा के साक्षियों की वेब साइट: jw.org". JW.ORG. Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  76. "July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report". Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. September 13, 2011. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  77. Jess, Kevin (February 16, 2011). "Hindu mob attacks Christian women, police back mob". Digital Journal. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
  78. "2011 Report on International Religious Freedom – India". Refworld. United States Department of State. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
  79. "Violence against Jehovah's Witnesses in India escalates as police assist mob attacks", Authorized Site of the Office of Public Information of Jehovah's Witnesses, Archived 2012-01-07 at the Wayback Machine
  80. "USCIRF Annual Report 2013 – Tier 2: India". refworld. UNHCR The UN Refugee Agency. 30 April 2013. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
  81. "Woman killed, several injured in explosion at a convention centre in Kerala's Kalamassery". The Hindu. 29 October 2023. Archived from the original on 29 October 2023. Retrieved 29 October 2023.
  82. Mollan, Cherylann; Padanna, Ashraf (30 October 2023). "Kerala attacks: India police investigate deadly blasts targeting Jehovah's Witnesses". BBC News. Archived from the original on 30 October 2023. Retrieved 2023-10-30.
  83. "Kalamassery blast: One more succumbs to injuries, death toll up to 7". onmanorama.
  84. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/13/0
  85. https://webarchive.archive.unhcr.org/20240214101123/https://www.refworld.org/docid/5b20ddaba.html
  86. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/17/4
  87. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/17/2
  88. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/17/0
  89. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200273229/18/0
  90. Jubber, Ken (1977). "The Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Southern Africa". Social Compass. 24 (1): 121–134. doi:10.1177/003776867702400108. S2CID 143997010.
  91. Tengatenga, James (2006). Church, State, and Society in Malawi: An Analysis of Anglican Ecclesiology. Kachere Series. p. 113. ISBN 9990876517.
  92. Carver, Richard (1990). Where Silence Rules: The Suppression of Dissent in Malawi. Human Rights Watch. pp. 64–66. ISBN 9780929692739.
  93. Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E. (1986). Human Rights in Commonwealth Africa. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 110. ISBN 0847674339.
  94. "Parliamentary Debates". Kenya National Assembly Official Record (Hansard). 19 April 1995. p. 499. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
  95. "Malawi Human Rights Practices, 1993". U.S. Department Of State. January 31, 1994. Archived from the original on 3 September 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
  96. "Malawi A new future for human rights". Amnesty International. February 1994. Archived from the original on 3 September 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
  97. "Jehovah's Witnesses Banned in Moscow". NPR. Archived from the original on 2021-02-12.
  98. ^ "How Jehovah's Witnesses are Being Targeted Under Russia's Anti-Extremism Laws". The Independent. December 1, 2015. Archived from the original on 2022-05-25.
  99. "ECHR looks into Russia's treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses". RAPSI. 25 March 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  100. "Media: Constitutional Court agreed that site can be considered extremist for the content of one page" (in Russian). January 31, 2016.
  101. "Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia suspended over extremism". TASS.
  102. ^ "Forum 18: Russia: Jehovah's Witnesses banned, property confiscated". Forum 18. 20 April 2017.
  103. "Эксперты ООН призвали Россию прекратить судебный процесс в отношении организации "Свидетели Иеговы"". Новости ООН. April 4, 2017.
  104. "PDS RUSSIA RELIGION NEWS April 2017". www2.stetson.edu.
  105. "Russia: Court Bans Jehovah's Witnesses". Human Rights Watch. April 20, 2017.
  106. "Helsinki Commission Condemns Pending Legal Action against Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia". CSCE. March 28, 2017. Archived from the original on August 11, 2021. Retrieved May 2, 2017.
  107. Service, Jonathan Luxmoore, Catholic News. "Russian Catholic official criticizes court ban on Jehovah's Witnesses". www.catholicregister.org.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  108. "Religious freedom dying in Russia, missionary says | Baptist Press". www.baptistpress.com/. April 28, 2017.
  109. "PDS RUSSIA RELIGION NEWS April 2017". www2.stetson.edu.
  110. "PDS RUSSIA RELIGION NEWS April 2017". www2.stetson.edu.
  111. EDT, Jason Le Miere On 4/21/17 at 11:23 AM (April 21, 2017). "Russia's ban on Jehovah's Witnesses shows the "paranoia" of Vladimir Putin, according to a U.S. commission". Newsweek.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  112. "Museum Statement on Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia – United States Holocaust Memorial Museum". www.ushmm.org.
  113. Gershkovich, Evan (April 27, 2018). "Russia's Crackdown on Jehovah's Witnesses Begins With a Foreigner". The Moscow Times.
  114. "Verdict for Dennis Christensen Scheduled for February 6, 2019". JW.ORG.
  115. Yuhas, Alan (2019-02-06). "Russian Court Sentences Jehovah's Witness to 6 Years in Prison". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-02-07.
  116. "Russia's Jehovah's Witnesses allege '21st-century Inquisition' amid claims of torture". Independent.co.uk. 22 February 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-05-25.
  117. "First Woman Jehovah's Witness Sentenced to Prison in Russia". The Moscow Times. 2021-02-24. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  118. "Russia Accused of 'New Low' In Jehovah's Witnesses Crackdown After Woman, 69, Jailed". www.msn.com. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  119. "Brother Roman Baranovskiy and His Mother, Sister Valentina Baranovskaya, Lose Their Appeal". JW.ORG. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  120. "Russia Accused of 'New Low' In Jehovah's Witnesses Crackdown After Woman, 69, Jailed". www.msn.com. Retrieved 2021-06-21.
  121. "Three Jehovah's Witness Get Prison Terms In Russian-Annexed Crimea Amid Crackdown". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 2022-10-08.
  122. ^ "Singapore". Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  123. "Singapore", International Religious Freedom Report 2004, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, As Retrieved 2010-03-11
  124. "Singapore". U.S. Department of State. Archived from the original on 30 November 2009. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  125. "Chan Hiang Leng Colin and Others v Public Prosecutor". Archived from the original on 2012-10-26. Retrieved 2021-04-16.
  126. ^ "Singapore: Fighting faith of stoic witnesses to repression". Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  127. "Singapore Police Swoop On Jehovah's Witnesses". Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  128. "Fighting faith of stoic witnesses to repression". Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  129. "Jehovah's Witnesses Jailed in Singapore for Meeting". ChristianityToday.com. 8 January 1996. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  130. "Singapore:Jehovah Witnesses charged in Singapore". Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  131. ^ "International Religious Freedom Report 2002: Singapore". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  132. "Singapore". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  133. ^ "Singapore". U.S. Department of State. 14 September 2007. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  134. "Singapore". U.S. Department of State. 19 September 2008. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  135. "Military service becomes compulsory for White South African men. | South African History Online". www.sahistory.org.za.
  136. "Survey of Race Relations 1974". South African Institute of Race Relations.
  137. Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, The Sword and the Shield, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 503, ISBN 0-465-00310-9
  138. ^ Pavel Polian. "Against Their Will: The History and Geography of Forced Migrations in the USSR", Central European University Press, 2004, pp. 169–171, ISBN 978-963-9241-68-8
  139. Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, The Sword and the Shield, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 505, ISBN 0-465-00310-9
  140. "Recalling Operation North", by Vitali Kamyshev, "Русская мысль", Париж, N 4363, 26 April 2001 (in Russian)
  141. Валерий Пасат ."Трудные страницы истории Молдовы (1940–1950)". Москва: Изд. Terra, 1994 (in Russian)
  142. Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, The Sword and the Shield, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 506, ISBN 0-465-00310-9
  143. "Christian Believers Were Persecuted by All Tolatitarian Regimes" Prava Lyudini ("Rights of a Person"), the newspaper of a Ukrainian human rights organization, Kharkiv, December 2001 (in Russian)
  144. "Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant – Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee – Turkmenistan". United Nations Human Rights Office of the high Commissioner – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 19 April 2012. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
  145. "Turkmenistan Releases 16 Brothers From Various Prisons". Watch Tower Society. May 8, 2021.
  146. "Turkmenistan: International Religious Freedom Report 2004". www.state.gov/. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. 21 May 2015. Retrieved 2016-03-15.
  147. "Turkmenistan: Turkmenistan Sentences B. H. to Four-Year Prison Term for Religious Activity". Jehovah's Witnesses.
  148. "Turkmenistan: Torture and jail for one 4 year and 14 short-term prisoners of conscience". Forum 18 News Service. 21 May 2015. Retrieved 2016-03-12.
  149. "Turkmenistan 2015/2016: Freedom of religion". www.amnesty.org. Retrieved 2016-03-15.
  150. Hall (1992), p. 394
  151. ^ Hall (1992), p. 395
  152. Irons, Peter. A People's History of the Supreme Court p. 341. New York: Viking Penguin, 1999.
  153. Peters (2000), p. 10
  154. Peters (2000), p. 8
  155. Hudson, David L. (2008). The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book. Canton, Michigan: Visible Ink Press. pp. 261. ISBN 9781578591961.
  156. "Gibson v. US". Findlaw. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
  157. "Estep v. United States". Findlaw. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
  158. "Dickinson v. United States". Findlaw. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
  159. Peters (2000), pp. 274–276

Bibliography

Further reading

Religious persecution and discrimination
By group
Methods
Events
icon Religion
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/National
Manifestations
Discriminatory
policies
Countermeasures
Related topics
Category: