| Revision as of 19:41, 19 February 2015 editKnowledgekid87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers96,753 edits →Comments by other users: More← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:21, 10 August 2024 edit undoRoySmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators92,277 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tags: Replaced Manual revert | ||
| (344 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|ItsLassieTime}} | {{SPIarchive notice|ItsLassieTime|crosswiki=yes}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| =====<big>19 February 2015</big>===== | |||
| {{SPI case status|}} | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Rationalobserver}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| * | |||
| *{{U|ItsLassieTime}} has had many confirmed socks, (see ]), and I've scrubbed quite a lot of the work done by the various accounts, but mostly work done by the account {{u|Susanne2009NYC}}. A couple of days ago I saw an edit summary that made me think of that account. This RO is similar in tone . Yesterday I saw on {{u|SlimVirgin}}'s talk page and it struck me as equally similar. | |||
| *Because I've spent so much time scrutinizing ItsLassieTime's work, , , , , I decided to take a look at ], which RO wrote. I found the source online , and only ten pages in found these instances of close paraphrasing that I posted to the talk page . I also posted to talk ] because the same material is in both articles, but that post got reverted, . I've pinged {{u|Moonriddengirl}} and am pinging {{u|Ruhrfisch}} who also might recognize the style. I did have a fair amount of harassment from ItsLassietime on my talk and might have some old IPs but at this point I believe it would all be stale and we have to go on behavioral patterns. Also pinging {{u|Montanabw}}, who I believe, knows ItsLassietime from one of the other accounts. | |||
| *Less telling, but still are these edit summaries using "oops" or a variation of it, found on a very quick scan of contribs, , and . Thanks. ] (]) 18:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Really? I'm the only person who's ever used the word "oops" in an edit summary? . ] (]) 19:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| *'''Comment''' - I don't see a connection here. If you are going to use the word "oops" for example to compare edit summaries that strikes me is a bit bizzare. The rest is just a he said she said argument. - ] (]) 19:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 21:21, 10 August 2024
ItsLassieTime
ItsLassieTime (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/ItsLassieTime.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.