Misplaced Pages

Market manipulation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:15, 22 February 2015 editKristina451 (talk | contribs)373 edits Undid revision 648282272 by PortugueseManofPeace (talk) POV pushing and obviously false per quote stuffing article← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:35, 3 December 2024 edit undo2a01:5a8:46d:b97b:a2b3:c4f3:6f78:ac92 (talk) →Churning: fixing punctuation 
(182 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Deliberate attempt to interfere with and subvert the free market}}
'''Market manipulation''' is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the free and fair operation of the market and create artificial, false or misleading appearances with respect to the price of, or market for, a ], ] or ]. Market manipulation is prohibited in most countries, in particular, it is prohibited in the United States under Section 9(a)(2)<ref>http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf</ref> of the ], in Australia under Section 1041A of the ], and in ] under Section 54(a) of the securities act of 1968. The Act defines market manipulation as transactions which create an artificial price or maintain an artificial price for a tradeable security. Market manipulation is also prohibited for ] electricity markets under Section 222 of the ]<ref>16 U.S.C. § 824v</ref> and ] ] markets under Section 4A of the ].<ref>15 U.S.C § 717c-1</ref>
{{Other uses|Manipulation (disambiguation){{!}}Manipulation}}
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}}
{{globalize|date=June 2017}}
{{Criminology and penology}}
{{Criminal law}}
In ] and ], '''market manipulation''' is a type of ] where there is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the ] operation of the ]; the most blatant of cases involve creating false or misleading appearances with respect to the ] of, or market for, a ], ] or ].{{Citation needed|date=September 2021|reason=This definition needs a citation from a reliable source. Currently, there is no source provided for it.}}

Market manipulation is prohibited in most countries, in particular, it is prohibited in the ] under Section 9(a)(2)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050113191512/https://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf|url-status=dead|title=SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934|archive-date=2005-01-13|website=www.sec.gov}}</ref> of the ], in the ] under Article 12 of the ''Market Abuse Regulation'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014R0596-20210101|title=Document 02014R0596-20210101|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> in ] under Section 1041A of the ], and in ] under Section 54(a) of the securities act of 1968. In the US, market manipulation is also prohibited for ] electricity markets under Section 222 of the ]<ref>16 U.S.C. § 824v</ref> and wholesale ] markets under Section 4A of the ].<ref>15 U.S.C § 717c-1</ref>

The US Securities Exchange Act defines market manipulation as "transactions which create an artificial price or maintain an artificial price for a ]."


==Examples== ==Examples==
{{norefs|section|date=January 2024}}
*Pools: "Agreements, often written, among a group of traders to delegate authority to a single manager to trade in a specific stock for a specific period of time and then to share in the resulting profits or losses."<ref>Mahoney, Paul G., 1999. The Stock Pools and the Securities Exchange Act. Journal of Financial Economics 51, 343-369.</ref>

*Churning: "When a trader places both buy and sell orders at about the same price. The increase in activity is intended to attract additional investors, and increase the price."
===Pools===
*Stock Bashing: "This scheme is usually orchestrated by savvy online message board posters (a.k.a. "Bashers") who make up false and/or misleading information about the target company in an attempt to get shares for a cheaper price. This activity, in most cases, is conducted by posting libelous posts on multiple public forums. The perpetrators sometimes work directly for unscrupulous Investor Relations firms who have convertible notes that convert for more shares the lower the bid or ask price is; thus the lower these Bashers can drive a stock price down by trying to convince shareholders they have bought a worthless security, the more shares the Investor Relations firm receives as compensation. Immediately after the stock conversion is complete and shares are issued to the Investor Relations firm, consultant, attorney or similar party, the basher/s then become friends of the company and move quickly to ensure they profit on a classic Pump & Dump scheme to liquidate their ill gotten shares. (see P&D)"
Agreements, often written, among a group of traders to delegate authority to a single manager to trade in a specific stock for a work period of time and then to share in the resulting profits or losses.<ref>Mahoney, Paul G., 1999. .{{closed access}} Journal of Financial Economics 51, 343-369.</ref> In Australia section 1041B prohibits pooling.
*]: "This scheme is generally part of a more complex grand plan of market manipulation on the targeted security. The Perpetrators (Usually stock promoters) convince company affiliates and large position non-affiliates to release shares into a free trading status as "Payment" for services for promoting the security. Instead of putting out legitimate information about a company the promoter sends out bogus e-mails (the "Pump") to millions of unsophisticated investors (Sometimes called "Retail Investors") in an attempt to drive the price of the stock and volume to higher points. After they accomplish both, the promoter sells their shares (the "Dump") and the stock price falls like a stone, taking all the duped investors money with it."

*Runs: "When a group of traders create activity or rumors in order to drive the price of a security up." An example is the ] of the 1980s. In the US, this activity is usually referred to as ''painting the tape''.<ref></ref> Runs may also occur when trader(s) are attempting to drive the price of a certain share down, although this is rare. (see Stock Bashing)"
===Churning===
*Ramping (the market): "Actions designed to artificially raise the market price of listed securities and to give the impression of voluminous trading, in order to make a quick profit."<ref></ref>
When an advisor enters into a trade for the sole purpose of earning commission. For example, buying and selling the same stock either on the same day or over multiple days with no consideration for the benefit of the client.
*]: "Selling and repurchasing the same or substantially the same security for the purpose of generating activity and increasing the price".

*]: "Attempting to push the price of a stock down by heavy selling or ]."<ref></ref>
===Stock bashing===
*Lure and Squeeze: The way it works is a company is very distressed on paper, with impossibly high debt and consistently high annual losses, but very few assets, making it look as if bankruptcy must be imminent. The stock price gradually falls as people new to the stock short it on the basis of the poor outlook for the company, until the number of shorted shares greatly exceeds the total number of shares that are not held by those aware of the lure and squeeze scheme (call them "people in the know"). In the meantime, people in the know increasingly purchase the stock as it drops to lower and lower prices. When the short interest has reached a maximum, the company announces it has made a deal with its creditors to settle its loans in exchange for shares of stock (or some similar kind of arrangement that leverages the stock price to benefit the company), knowing that those who have short positions will be squeezed as the price of the stock sky-rockets. Near its peak price, people in the know start to sell, and the price gradually falls back down again for the cycle to repeat.
This scheme is usually orchestrated by online message board posters (a.k.a. "Bashers") who make up false or misleading information about the target company in an attempt to get shares for a cheaper price. This activity, in most cases, is conducted by posting libelous posts on multiple public forums. The perpetrators sometimes work directly for unscrupulous Investor Relations firms who have convertible notes that convert for more shares the lower the bid or ask price is; thus the lower these Bashers can drive a stock price down by trying to convince shareholders they have bought a worthless security, the more shares the Investor Relations firm receives as compensation. Immediately after the stock conversion is complete and shares are issued to the Investor Relations firm, consultant, attorney or similar party, the basher/s then become friends of the company and move quickly to ensure they profit on a classic Pump & Dump scheme to liquidate their ill-gotten shares. (See pump and dump.)
*] is a tactic employed by ] that involves quickly entering and withdrawing large quantities of orders in an attempt to flood the market, thereby gaining an advantage over slower market participants.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quote-stuffing.asp |title=Quote Stuffing Definition |publisher=Investopedia |accessdate=October 27, 2014}}</ref>

===Pump and dump===
A ] scheme is generally part of a more complex grand plan of market manipulation on the targeted security. The perpetrators (usually stock promoters) convince company affiliates and large position non-affiliates to release shares into a free trading status as "Payment" for services for promoting the security. Instead of putting out legitimate information about a company the promoter sends out bogus e-mails (the "Pump") to millions of unsophisticated investors (Sometimes called "Retail Investors") in an attempt to drive the price of the stock and volume to higher points. When the stock price and volume has reached a target level the promoter sells their shares (the "Dump") at the now elevated prices, taking money off the duped investors who are left holding a stock whose price subsequently falls.

===Runs===
When a group of traders create activity or rumours in order to drive the price of a security up. An example is the ] of the 1980s. In the US, this activity is usually referred to as ''painting the tape''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/paintingthetape.asp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20001025064741/http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/paintingthetape.asp|url-status=live|title=Painting the Tape|first=Will|last=Kenton|archive-date=2000-10-25|website=Investopedia}}</ref> Runs may also occur when traders are attempting to drive the price of a certain share down, although this is rare. (see Stock Bashing)

===Ramping (the market)===
Actions designed to artificially raise the market price of listed securities and give the impression of voluminous trading in order to make a quick profit.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sanford.com.au/sanford/Help/Glossary/Glossary.asp?Letter=R |title=Sanford: Overview |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070829224727/http://www.sanford.com.au/sanford/Help/Glossary/Glossary.asp?Letter=R |archive-date=2007-08-29 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Filtering out or disregarding false and misleading social media posts that are posted for the sole purpose of artificially inflating a stock price can prevent investor losses.

===Wash trade===
In a ] the manipulator takes both the buy and the sell side of a trade, often using a third party as a proxy to trade on behalf of the manipulator, for the purpose of generating activity and increasing the price. This is more involved than churning because the orders are actually fulfilled.

===Bear raid===
In a ] there is an attempt to push the price of a stock down by heavy selling or ].<ref>{{cite book |title=Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms |first1=John |last1=Downes |first2=Jordan Elliot |last2=Goodman |edition=4 |date=August 1995 |publisher=Barron’s Educational Series |isbn=0812090357 |page=46}}</ref>

===Lure and squeeze===
This works with a company that is very ], with impossibly high debt, consistently high annual losses but very few assets, making it look as if bankruptcy must be imminent. The stock price gradually falls as people new to the stock short it on the basis of the poor outlook for the company, until the number of shorted shares greatly exceeds the total number of shares that are not held by those aware of the lure and squeeze scheme (henceforward "people in the know"). In the meantime, people in the know increasingly purchase the stock as it drops to lower and lower prices. When the short interest has reached a maximum, the company announces it has made a deal with its creditors to settle its loans in exchange for shares of stock (or some similar kind of arrangement that leverages the stock price to benefit the company), knowing that those who have short positions will be squeezed as the price of the stock sky-rockets. Near its peak price, people in the know start to sell, and the price gradually falls back down again for the cycle to repeat.

===Quote stuffing===
] is made possible by high-frequency trading programs that can execute market actions with incredible speed. However, high-frequency trading in and of itself is not illegal. The tactic involves using specialized, high-bandwidth hardware to quickly enter and withdraw large quantities of orders in an attempt to flood the market, thereby gaining an advantage over slower market participants.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quote-stuffing.asp |title=Quote Stuffing Definition |publisher=Investopedia |access-date=October 27, 2014}}</ref>

===Cross-market manipulation===
Cross-market manipulation occurs when a trader trades in one market for the purpose of manipulating the price of an asset in another market, capitalizing off the price-moving effects thus generated, instead of with the bona fide intent of profiting off the trade itself.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Zabel|first=Joseph|date=August 27, 2020|title=Rethinking Open- and Cross-Market Manipulation Enforcement|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3682103|journal=Virginia Law & Business Review|ssrn=3682103|via=SSRN}}</ref>

===Cross-product manipulation===
A type of manipulation possible when financial instruments are settled based on ] set by the trading of physical commodities, for example in United States Natural Gas Markets. The manipulator takes a large ] that will benefit from the benchmark settling at a higher (lower) price, then trades in the physical commodity markets at such a large volume as to influence the benchmark price in the direction that will benefit their financial position.

===Spoofing (finance)===
] is a disruptive algorithmic trading entity employed by traders to outpace other market participants and to manipulate commodity markets. Spoofers feign interest in trading futures, stocks and other products in financial markets creating an illusion of exchange pessimism in the futures market when many offers are being cancelled or withdrawn, or false optimism or demand when many offers are being placed in bad faith. Spoofers bid or offer with intent to cancel before the orders are filled. The flurry of activity around the buy or sell orders is intended to attract other ] (HFT) to induce a particular market reaction such as manipulating the market price of a security. Spoofing can be a factor in the rise and fall of the price of shares and can be very profitable to the spoofer who can time buying and selling based on this manipulation.

=== Price-fixing ===
Price-fixing is a very simple type of fraud where the principals who publish a price or indicator conspire to set it falsely and benefit their own interests. ] for example, involved bankers setting the ] rate to benefit their trader's portfolios or to make certain entities appear more creditworthy than they were.

===High closing (finance)===
High closing is an attempt to manipulate the price of a security at the end of trading day to ensure that it closes higher than it should. This is usually achieved by putting in manipulative trades close to closing.

===Cornering the market===
In ] the manipulators buy sufficiently large amount of an asset, often a commodity, so they can control the price creating in effect a ]. For example, the brothers ] and ] attempted to corner the world ] markets in the late 1970s and early 1980s, at one stage holding the rights to more than half of the world's deliverable silver.<REF NAME="TEXAS">{{Cite magazine
| last = Gwynne
| first = S. C.
| title = Bunker HUNT
|magazine= Texas Monthly
| volume = 29
| issue = 9
|page=78
| publisher = Emmis Communications Corporation
| location = Austin, Texas, United States
| date = September 2001
}}</ref> During the Hunts' accumulation of the precious metal, silver prices rose from $11 an ounce in September 1979 to nearly $50 an ounce in January 1980.<REF NAME="NYT">{{cite news
| last = Eichenwald
| first = Kurt
| title = 2 Hunts Fined And Banned From Trades
| work=The New York Times
| date = 1989-12-21
| url = https://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/21/business/2-hunts-fined-and-banned-from-trades.html
| access-date = 2008-06-29 }}</ref> Silver prices ultimately collapsed to below $11 an ounce two months later,<REF NAME="NYT" /> much of the fall occurring on a single day now known as ], due to changes made to exchange rules regarding the purchase of commodities on margin.<REF NAME="TimeBubble">{{Cite magazine
| title = Bunker's Busted Silver Bubble
|magazine=Time Magazine
| publisher = Time Inc.
| date = 1980-05-12
| access-date = 2008-06-29
| url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,920875-2,00.html
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081002194346/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,920875-2,00.html
| url-status = dead
| archive-date = October 2, 2008
}}</ref>

==See also==
<!---♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order ♦♦♦--->
* ]
* ]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-07-19|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|target_link=Adani Group#2023 fraud allegations|reason= The anchor (2023 fraud allegations) ].}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist|30em}}


{{stock market}} {{stock market}}


]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 01:35, 3 December 2024

Deliberate attempt to interfere with and subvert the free market For other uses, see Manipulation.

Globe icon.The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (June 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Criminology and penology
Theory
Major theorists
Types of crime
Methods
Penology
Justice in penology
Schools
Subfields
Browse
Criminal law
Elements
Scope of criminal liability
Severity of offense
Inchoate offenses
Offense against the person
Sexual offenses
Crimes against property
Crimes against justice
Crimes against the public
Crimes against animals
Crimes against the state
Defenses to liability
Other common-law areas
Portals

In economics and finance, market manipulation is a type of market abuse where there is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the free and fair operation of the market; the most blatant of cases involve creating false or misleading appearances with respect to the price of, or market for, a product, security or commodity.

Market manipulation is prohibited in most countries, in particular, it is prohibited in the United States under Section 9(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in the European Union under Article 12 of the Market Abuse Regulation, in Australia under Section 1041A of the Corporations Act 2001, and in Israel under Section 54(a) of the securities act of 1968. In the US, market manipulation is also prohibited for wholesale electricity markets under Section 222 of the Federal Power Act and wholesale natural gas markets under Section 4A of the Natural Gas Act.

The US Securities Exchange Act defines market manipulation as "transactions which create an artificial price or maintain an artificial price for a tradable security."

Examples

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Market manipulation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Pools

Agreements, often written, among a group of traders to delegate authority to a single manager to trade in a specific stock for a work period of time and then to share in the resulting profits or losses. In Australia section 1041B prohibits pooling.

Churning

When an advisor enters into a trade for the sole purpose of earning commission. For example, buying and selling the same stock either on the same day or over multiple days with no consideration for the benefit of the client.

Stock bashing

This scheme is usually orchestrated by online message board posters (a.k.a. "Bashers") who make up false or misleading information about the target company in an attempt to get shares for a cheaper price. This activity, in most cases, is conducted by posting libelous posts on multiple public forums. The perpetrators sometimes work directly for unscrupulous Investor Relations firms who have convertible notes that convert for more shares the lower the bid or ask price is; thus the lower these Bashers can drive a stock price down by trying to convince shareholders they have bought a worthless security, the more shares the Investor Relations firm receives as compensation. Immediately after the stock conversion is complete and shares are issued to the Investor Relations firm, consultant, attorney or similar party, the basher/s then become friends of the company and move quickly to ensure they profit on a classic Pump & Dump scheme to liquidate their ill-gotten shares. (See pump and dump.)

Pump and dump

A pump and dump scheme is generally part of a more complex grand plan of market manipulation on the targeted security. The perpetrators (usually stock promoters) convince company affiliates and large position non-affiliates to release shares into a free trading status as "Payment" for services for promoting the security. Instead of putting out legitimate information about a company the promoter sends out bogus e-mails (the "Pump") to millions of unsophisticated investors (Sometimes called "Retail Investors") in an attempt to drive the price of the stock and volume to higher points. When the stock price and volume has reached a target level the promoter sells their shares (the "Dump") at the now elevated prices, taking money off the duped investors who are left holding a stock whose price subsequently falls.

Runs

When a group of traders create activity or rumours in order to drive the price of a security up. An example is the Guinness share-trading fraud of the 1980s. In the US, this activity is usually referred to as painting the tape. Runs may also occur when traders are attempting to drive the price of a certain share down, although this is rare. (see Stock Bashing)

Ramping (the market)

Actions designed to artificially raise the market price of listed securities and give the impression of voluminous trading in order to make a quick profit. Filtering out or disregarding false and misleading social media posts that are posted for the sole purpose of artificially inflating a stock price can prevent investor losses.

Wash trade

In a wash trade the manipulator takes both the buy and the sell side of a trade, often using a third party as a proxy to trade on behalf of the manipulator, for the purpose of generating activity and increasing the price. This is more involved than churning because the orders are actually fulfilled.

Bear raid

In a bear raid there is an attempt to push the price of a stock down by heavy selling or short selling.

Lure and squeeze

This works with a company that is very distressed on paper, with impossibly high debt, consistently high annual losses but very few assets, making it look as if bankruptcy must be imminent. The stock price gradually falls as people new to the stock short it on the basis of the poor outlook for the company, until the number of shorted shares greatly exceeds the total number of shares that are not held by those aware of the lure and squeeze scheme (henceforward "people in the know"). In the meantime, people in the know increasingly purchase the stock as it drops to lower and lower prices. When the short interest has reached a maximum, the company announces it has made a deal with its creditors to settle its loans in exchange for shares of stock (or some similar kind of arrangement that leverages the stock price to benefit the company), knowing that those who have short positions will be squeezed as the price of the stock sky-rockets. Near its peak price, people in the know start to sell, and the price gradually falls back down again for the cycle to repeat.

Quote stuffing

Quote stuffing is made possible by high-frequency trading programs that can execute market actions with incredible speed. However, high-frequency trading in and of itself is not illegal. The tactic involves using specialized, high-bandwidth hardware to quickly enter and withdraw large quantities of orders in an attempt to flood the market, thereby gaining an advantage over slower market participants.

Cross-market manipulation

Cross-market manipulation occurs when a trader trades in one market for the purpose of manipulating the price of an asset in another market, capitalizing off the price-moving effects thus generated, instead of with the bona fide intent of profiting off the trade itself.

Cross-product manipulation

A type of manipulation possible when financial instruments are settled based on benchmarks set by the trading of physical commodities, for example in United States Natural Gas Markets. The manipulator takes a large long (short) financial position that will benefit from the benchmark settling at a higher (lower) price, then trades in the physical commodity markets at such a large volume as to influence the benchmark price in the direction that will benefit their financial position.

Spoofing (finance)

Spoofing is a disruptive algorithmic trading entity employed by traders to outpace other market participants and to manipulate commodity markets. Spoofers feign interest in trading futures, stocks and other products in financial markets creating an illusion of exchange pessimism in the futures market when many offers are being cancelled or withdrawn, or false optimism or demand when many offers are being placed in bad faith. Spoofers bid or offer with intent to cancel before the orders are filled. The flurry of activity around the buy or sell orders is intended to attract other high-frequency traders (HFT) to induce a particular market reaction such as manipulating the market price of a security. Spoofing can be a factor in the rise and fall of the price of shares and can be very profitable to the spoofer who can time buying and selling based on this manipulation.

Price-fixing

Price-fixing is a very simple type of fraud where the principals who publish a price or indicator conspire to set it falsely and benefit their own interests. The Libor scandal for example, involved bankers setting the Libor rate to benefit their trader's portfolios or to make certain entities appear more creditworthy than they were.

High closing (finance)

High closing is an attempt to manipulate the price of a security at the end of trading day to ensure that it closes higher than it should. This is usually achieved by putting in manipulative trades close to closing.

Cornering the market

In cornering the market the manipulators buy sufficiently large amount of an asset, often a commodity, so they can control the price creating in effect a monopoly. For example, the brothers Nelson Bunker Hunt and William Herbert Hunt attempted to corner the world silver markets in the late 1970s and early 1980s, at one stage holding the rights to more than half of the world's deliverable silver. During the Hunts' accumulation of the precious metal, silver prices rose from $11 an ounce in September 1979 to nearly $50 an ounce in January 1980. Silver prices ultimately collapsed to below $11 an ounce two months later, much of the fall occurring on a single day now known as Silver Thursday, due to changes made to exchange rules regarding the purchase of commodities on margin.

See also

References

  1. "SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934" (PDF). www.sec.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-01-13.
  2. "Document 02014R0596-20210101". EUR-Lex.
  3. 16 U.S.C. § 824v
  4. 15 U.S.C § 717c-1
  5. Mahoney, Paul G., 1999. The Stock Pools and the Securities Exchange Act.Closed access icon Journal of Financial Economics 51, 343-369.
  6. Kenton, Will. "Painting the Tape". Investopedia. Archived from the original on 2000-10-25.
  7. "Sanford: Overview". Archived from the original on 2007-08-29.
  8. Downes, John; Goodman, Jordan Elliot (August 1995). Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms (4 ed.). Barron’s Educational Series. p. 46. ISBN 0812090357.
  9. "Quote Stuffing Definition". Investopedia. Retrieved October 27, 2014.
  10. Zabel, Joseph (August 27, 2020). "Rethinking Open- and Cross-Market Manipulation Enforcement". Virginia Law & Business Review. SSRN 3682103 – via SSRN.
  11. Gwynne, S. C. (September 2001). "Bunker HUNT". Texas Monthly. Vol. 29, no. 9. Austin, Texas, United States: Emmis Communications Corporation. p. 78.
  12. ^ Eichenwald, Kurt (1989-12-21). "2 Hunts Fined And Banned From Trades". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-06-29.
  13. "Bunker's Busted Silver Bubble". Time Magazine. Time Inc. 1980-05-12. Archived from the original on October 2, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-29.
Financial markets
Types of markets
Types of stocks
Share capital
Participants
Trading venues
Stock valuation
Trading theories
and strategies
Related terms
Categories: