Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nomoskedasticity: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:31, 10 March 2015 editMaryJane263 (talk | contribs)37 edits Listing for Steve Morgan (Businessman): new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024 edit undoCarlesFort (talk | contribs)22 edits Edit page - Legatum Institute: new sectionTag: New topic 
(566 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
* }} * }}


== University Bible Fellowship article vandalism ==


== Notice ==
Hey Nomo would you submit the ] page to be locked please? It has been getting anonymous section blanking/vandalism multiple times. Thanks ] (]) 17:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
== Philip Benedict ==


You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.
Hi Nomo, the latest revisions to the Phil Benedict page (which you deleted) were entirely based on third party sources. There wasn't a single citation of his CV. There were links to two different University websites (one in Europe, another in America) and two references from third party University Press books. All this in two short sentences. Perhaps you didn't see the updates before you deleted it? Either way, I would appreciate it if you would revert to the latest, update section. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I'm thinking you haven't worked out what a ] source is. Sorry. ] (]) 23:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
::Hi. These are books not written by Benedict. They are books in which Benedict is mentioned as a third party. Isn't this a secondary source? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
:::There were two books. But there were other sources that didn't meet secondary, and they were pertinent to the more general point of the paragraph. ] (]) 21:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
So why not challenge those two other secondary sources -- none of them were written by Benedict, by the way? Why not take it to the talk page to discuss your perspective? <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.
==Disambiguation link notification for March 3==


To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->


Please avoid edit comments such as this and this
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


==ANI notice== == Arbitration Enforcement notice ==
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
== Listing for Steve Morgan (Businessman) ==


Hello,
Good afternoon Nomoskedasticity

I have been referred to your user profile by Yun Shui who responded to my email to Misplaced Pages about the removal of information I am trying to update on Steve Morgan's page. I understand that some of what I tried to submit apparently didn't fit the criteria of Misplaced Pages however I'd like to ask why everything was deleted when I had backed all that was written up with independent references and sources? Look forward to your response and maybe some pointers as to how to amend his listing successfully? Thanks very much.
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 -->

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

== Edit page - Legatum Institute ==

]

Good morning, colleague,

I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "''whose sock are you?''" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it.

I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them.

Thank you very much.


<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> ] (]) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024


Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.


Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please avoid edit comments such as this and this

Arbitration Enforcement notice

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Edit page - Legatum Institute

Legatum Institute

Good morning, colleague,

I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "whose sock are you?" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it.

I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them.

Thank you very much.


~~~~ CarlesFort (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)