Misplaced Pages

User talk:Penbat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:26, 7 April 2015 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits Questions: r - this is a separate issue← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:56, 21 May 2024 edit undoGonnym (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors222,829 edits Notification: listing of Template:Abuse/doc at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(201 intermediate revisions by 73 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not around
|2 = {{BASEPAGENAME}}
|3 = {{MONTHNAME|9}} 2019}}
{{archive box|] ] ] ] ]}}

==Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!== ==Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!==
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%" {| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"| |class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA" {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello <font color=#0000FF>{{PAGENAME}}</font>! ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. If you decide that you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{&#123;helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to ] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ] 15:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC) </div> ! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello <span style="color:#0000FF;">{{PAGENAME}}</span>! ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. If you decide that you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{&#123;helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to ] on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ] 15:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC) </div>
|} |}
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%" {| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
Line 64: Line 69:
|- |-
|} |}
|}
|} |}
] 15:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

== Hi / Sock-puppet hunt==

'''Relocated from''' (talk) Wiki-psyc.<br/>
I notice you have copied elements of my user page onto your page. Anyway you seem to have hit the ground running. You are obviously a seasoned Wiki editor not a novice. Please provide full details of your previous Wikipdia accounts.--] (]) 08:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

<br/>] Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to ] can easily be misinterpreted. Misplaced Pages is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. This is the only Misplaced Pages account I have had. Admin can verify. Your comment has been removed. Thanks. ] (]) 23:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

<br/>] Please ] in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on ]. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Misplaced Pages. Filing a frivolous sockpuppet claim and stalking an editor is harassment. This is notice to stop.<!-- Template:uw-agf3 --> <br/>'''Investigation file:''' <br/>] (]) 16:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

:], Penbat was acting in ]. It's quite easy to see that you are not a ]. Showing up editing like you've been editing Misplaced Pages for years is obviously going to result in suspicion of your account. I immediately pegged you as a ] as well. Either that, or as a user returning under a ] rationale, whether or not that rationale is entirely in line with WP:Clean start. When I saw that you were commenting in the WP:Sockpuppet investigation that Penbat had started on you, I decided not to comment since that report was not solid. But now that I recently saw you again, this time at , I decided to state that acting like Penbat is wrong to be suspicious of you is incorrect. Very experienced Misplaced Pages editors usually are suspicious of new accounts that edit the way you do (meaning in a seasoned way), and with good reason; see ] as a recent example. Just know that if you are trying to help Misplaced Pages, so is Penbat.

::If you reply to me about this, I would prefer that you reply here at this talk page instead of at mine, so that the discussion stays jointed instead of disjointed. ] (]) 21:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

:::], does bringing a member before a tribunal after their first edit and on the grounds that it "exceeded expectations" qualify as ] or ]? I'll respect your opinion that it is with "good reason" and that it "helps Misplaced Pages". It is, however, not something I would recommend or endorse. If I were concerned about chronic troublemakers that resurface with new identities, I'd wait rather than error. Troublemakers generally recreate their controversies, in time, and give themselves away.

:::With respect to ], I just documented the work. Let's talk/work there. ]
:::] (]) 19:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

::::], how I handle potentially problematic returning editors is addressed on my user page; how I go about that works.
::::As for the Covert incest article, I'm not especially interested in it and I wasn't stating that you'd done anything wrong there. ] (]) 01:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

::::], for a relative newbie who only joined Wiki earlier this year, and has made less than 100 article edits, your ability to cite WP policies is at the advanced level. I've been on Wiki for 10 years and i'm not quite at your level. You managed to issue a Template:Uw-harass2 on my talk page (see above) after having done only four article edits. "Troublemakers generally recreate their controversies, in time, and give themselves away" - what lead you to deduce that ? --] (]) 08:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

'''You need to cease the bullying, harassment and personal attacks. I've asked you politely on a number of occasions. You have been told by the administrators on two occasions that your accusations are unfounded. Please conduct yourself professionally. I will file a harassment report next time you do this. I have asked the administrators to intervene are restore neutrality to the ''' <br/> ] (]) 18:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

== Bullying culture ==

Hi there, just wanted to drop you a line about your reversion of my edit on ]. I never change quotes without checking the source, but this one was uncheckable, and I actually couldn't tell if it was supposed to be a direct quote or not. Since the quoted phrase was so brief, in the middle of a much longer sentence, I thought it might have been just a turn of phrase that the Wiki author had put in quotes for being rather colloquial. A way of saying "so to speak." For that reason, I thought it might as well be grammatically correct.

Anyway, no big deal, just wanted to let you know I hadn't changed it lightly or unthinkingly, nor was I trying to Americanize the language - I try to stay sensitive to that. Thanks! ] (]) 14:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

==]==
Help!
This page has twice been speedily deleted as being promotional. I agree it's very positive, but I haven't found any negative coverage. In fact the company's press releases are less flattering than the stuff which comes from independent sources.
Can you help me - either to make it less promotional, or to defend it as it is? I can't see what else I can do to it. I've removed the material which came from the company's press releases.] (]) 21:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
:Sorry cant help - rather outside my sphere of interest and knowledge.--] (]) 21:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

== ] ==

This article was moved to a rather different title. I have just reverted the move and returned it to the original title. I wonder if you have any thoughts you would care to leave on the talk page. ] ] 18:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

== recent notification ==

What led you to jump to the conclusion that my edit was vandalism? I even thanked you for your prior edit... ] (]) 23:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
:Why on earth did you undo my revert then ? --] (]) 23:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

== Templates and see alsos ==

I see many, many complaints about the templates. We need the same links in so many places? I doubt it. The text at ] says that the purpose of templates is to avoid long "see also" sections. Also, if a title is linked in article text then there's no need for it to be in "see also" too. ] (]) 10:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
:Also: ]: "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes." Do you acknowledge that guideline? ] (]) 11:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

== Repeated text, #2 ==

=== ] ===
{{Main|Organisational culture|Workplace bullying}}
Bullying is seen to be prevalent in organisations where employees and managers feel that
they have the support, or at least implicitly the blessing, of senior managers to carry on their abusive
and bullying behaviour. Furthermore, new managers will quickly come to view this form of behaviour as
acceptable and normal if they see others get away with it and are even rewarded for it.<ref name="Salin D 2010">Salin D, Helge H “Organizational Causes of Workplace Bullying” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010)</ref>

When bullying happens at the highest levels, the effects may be far reaching. That people may be bullied irrespective of their organisational status or rank, including senior managers, indicates the possibility of a negative domino effect, where bullying may be cascaded downwards as the targeted supervisors might offload their own aggression on their subordinates. In such situations, a bullying scenario in the ] may actually threaten the ] of the entire organisation.<ref name=Organisational>Helge H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S “Organisational Effects of Workplace Bullying” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010)</ref>

=== ] ===
{{Main|Bullying culture|Workplace bullying}}
Bullying is seen to be prevalent in organisations where employees and managers feel that
they have the support, or at least implicitly the blessing, of senior managers to carry on their abusive
and bullying behaviour. Furthermore, new managers will quickly come to view this form of behaviour as
acceptable and normal if they see others get away with it and are even rewarded for it.<ref name="Salin D 2010">Salin D, Helge H "Organizational Causes of Workplace Bullying" in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010)</ref>

When bullying happens at the highest levels, the effects may be far reaching. That people may be bullied irrespective of their organisational status or rank, including senior managers, indicates the possibility of a negative ripple effect, where bullying may be cascaded downwards as the targeted supervisors might offload their own ] on their subordinates. In such situations, a bullying scenario in the ] may actually threaten the ] of the entire organisation.<ref name=Organisational>Helge H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S "Organisational Effects of Workplace Bullying" in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010)</ref>

===] ===
{{Main|Organizational culture|Bullying culture}}
Bullying is seen to be prevalent in organisations where employees and managers feel that
they have the support, or at least implicitly the blessing, of senior managers to carry on their abusive
and bullying behaviour. Furthermore, new managers will quickly come to view this form of behaviour as
acceptable and normal if they see others get away with it and are even rewarded for it.<ref name="Salin D 2010">Salin D, Helge H “Organizational Causes of Workplace Bullying” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010)</ref>

When bullying happens at the highest levels, the effects may be far reaching. That people may be bullied irrespective of their organisational status or rank, including senior managers, indicates the possibility of a negative domino effect, where bullying may be cascaded downwards as the targeted supervisors might offload their own ] on their subordinates. In such situations, a bullying scenario in the ] may actually threaten the ] of the entire organisation.<ref name=Organisational>Helge H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S “Organisational Effects of Workplace Bullying” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010)</ref>
{{Reflist talk}}

===Discussion===
Also: ] for a similar problem.

I'm confused. If the exact same text is in three articles, then none of those are the "main article". I suggest picking one and putting it there. Duplicate text like this clogs up articles and templates. ] (]) 11:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

:I've noticed other blocks of text that are reused across multiple articles as well. While it can make sense in some circumstances, there seems to be a pattern here. Maybe the way you're writing or compiling articles could be reviewed to reduce this rampant duplication of text. ] (]) 12:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

::You may not be aware of this, but anytime text is copied from one article to another in WP, it's legally important to identify the source article in the edit summary. If you follow that rule, it'll be easier for everyone to track the flow. ] (]) 12:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

== Please see the discussion to rename ] ==

This appears on its talk page. ] ] 12:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
:I dont have strong feelings either way.--] (]) 12:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
::That is perfectly fine. I know that you care about the topic whatever its title. ] ] 12:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

== Images on ] ==

] personal space '''reaction bubbles''' (1966), showing radius in feet]] Respectfully, I added back the images on ]. The images help readers to visualize this often misunderstood concept. They comply with the ] and, conversely, the manner and reasons given for their deletion do not. It might help to compare the use of images in this article to those in the ] article which we both have been actively involved. Graphics are very subjective and tastes differ so this is not as clear cut as a fact citation. I'm amenable to constructively exploring alternative options that will aid the readers either here or on the article's talk page. ] (]) 12:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

: Hi Penbat. I'm returning my comment here (where it was originally posted). If you wish to host a discussion on the article talk page, please author one yourself. Please do not make posts on my behalf and with my signature. If you prefer to close the matter and discard my note, that's fine. Many thanks ] (]) 13:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

== ] ==

{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->

== madoff and ] ==

why on earth do you think these two do not fit the criteria for psychopathy or anti social personality ?? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I've protected the ] page. Looks like Pizzon Lamb started using an IP to do reverts. After some lovely name calling on my talk page and edit history, I've also blocked the IP. I've told them about ] and the need for refs, but that went over their head. Give a yell if you need any help. ] (]) 08:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
::Cheers--] (]) 09:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for December 9==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

== "true self" and "True Self" ==

Looks like some links and named may need to be checked:
* ]: ]
* ]: "True Self is the fourth album by the Chicago-based music group Soil."
] -] 06:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

== Thank you for your kind acknowledgement of my Quality improvement efforts at Lie-to-children ==

Penbat,

Thank you for .

I very much appreciate your removal of the "{{tl|notable}}" tag from the top of the article page.

Perhaps you could provide your comment and opinion at ] ?

Thanks again,

&mdash; ''']''' (]) 18:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:{{done}}, I've commented an update in that section, you may as well if you wish, but I think at this point, hopefully, the complaints about notability are more than adequately addressed by the direct improvements to the article, itself, and therefore, resolved. &mdash; ''']''' (]) 03:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

== Thank you for your addition of my Quality improvement effort to the article Lie ==

Thank you for

Unfortunately, incoming links to the article ] were

Now that I've successfully embarked upon a Quality improvement project for the article ] -- do you think this would be a good time to restore those incoming links to this article that were previously recently removed ?

Thank you for your attention to this matter,

&mdash; ''']''' (]) 18:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
:{{done}}, I've added back the links. Hopefully, now that the article itself is improved, the links will remain in the future. &mdash; ''']''' (]) 03:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

== Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors! ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
:''please help translate this message into the local language''
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Cure Award'''
|-
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In 2015 you were one of the ] across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from ] for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining ''']''', there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.
|} |}
{{archive box|] ] ] ]}}


Thanks again :) -- ] along with the rest of the team at ] 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Doc James@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Doc_James/TopMedEditors2015&oldid=15392321 -->


==Disambiguation link notification for March 1==


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
== ] ==


==] has been nominated for discussion==
Hello Penbat. Regarding the discussion at ]. How would you feel about ]? This would address at least some of your concerns, and it lets people know the domain from which the word comes. Thank you, ] (]) 19:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 14:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for April 13==
<br />
Hello! I removed ] from a number of articles about medical associations and journals with names containing the word ''Physicians'' to which you added the category, as it is generally recommended to avoid characterizing by "a subject's name ... or by characteristics of the name" (see ]). In addition, as a part of ], ] is a biographical category tree intended primarily for articles and lists about ''people'', not organizations or other entities, which have their own category systems—e.g., ] and ]. It appears to me that you were attempting to convert ] (a ]) to a ] about the profession as a whole. Such changes potentially can affect hundreds or thousands of subcategorized articles, and so I urge you to propose all such changes at ], where you can obtain feedback from other editors. If there is anything that I can to do assist you, or if you have any questions, please let me know at ]. Best, -- ] <sup>(])</sup> 03:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for April 1==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
== Better source request for ] ==


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 15:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your upload to Misplaced Pages:
*]
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the ] status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the ''exact'' source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.


== April 2016 ==
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . If you have any questions please ask them at the ] or me at my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:Bsr-user --> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 03:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
] Hi there! Thank you for ] to ].


{{The edit-summary field}}
== Cluster B PD's and psychopathy ==


I noticed your recent edit to ] does not have an ].&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
I wanted to discuss the issue of Cluster B personality disorders - borderline PD, narcissistic PD, and antisocial PD and how they correlate with psychopathy. Researchers have proposed "subtypes" of psychopathy (borderline, narcissistic, antisocial, and sadistic) and the primary-secondary distinction is well known about and has quite a bit of backing to support the findings. Borderlines, narcissists, and antisocials frequently score quite high on the PCL-R relative to people without personality disorders, or even people with Cluster A & C PD's. Aggression, sexual promiscuoity, perversions, violence, manipulativeness, attention-seeking behavior, narcissism, lack of empathy, and the use of primitive defense mechanisms (projection, splitting, denial, etc) are common to all three of these Cluster B PD's - especially borderline personality disorder. Jeffrey Dahmer was a diagnosed BPD, as was Dennis Nilsen. Many psychoanaylsts and psychiatrists believe Adolf Hitler was a BPD. Angelina Jolie is classic textbook case of BPD. Aileen Wuornos, and even Andrei Chikatilo were both diagnosed with BPD. Psychopathy and BPD, NPD, and AsPD are related in a very intimate way. I believe that a substantial borderlines, narcissists, and sociopaths are psychopats - or the three seem to represent different "breeds" of psychopaths. --]] 22:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
:there are quite a few schools of thought on BPD/psychopathy eg Kernberg suggests BPD is closely linked to narcissism ]. There are quite a few variants of BPD and my understanding of it is that it is quite controversial and isnt a typical PD as the sufferers may be egodystonic rather than egosyntonic unlike most PDs. Psychopathy is usually considered to be most closely associated with antisocial personality disorder but isnt officially recognised by the DSM so doesnt belong to any cluster. Hitler probably had several mental health labels including paranoid PD, antisocial PD, narcissistic PD and maybe borderline PD.--] (]) 22:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
::I am a sufferer of borderline personality disorder. I can tell you that before my diagnosis, I had never ever thought there was anything wrong with me. I believed that I was normal and that this is how all people were, only I believed that I was "open", "honest", and comfortable enough with myself to let it all "hang out". I used to think other people were fake, scared and dishonest because they were hiding their natures (which I believed to be just like mine). I used to believe that I was actually the normal one, while most other people were phonies and liars. Not until I got diagnosed (and it took a year for the denial to dissipate and finally agreed to take the referral to DBT). Then I began to understand and my eyes opened up to the craziness - I was the problem, not everyone around me. Yet, even today I find I have justifications for everything untoward that I do, for every lie that I speak, for every person I verbally assault, etc. It is automatic. I can't seem to control it. It's nowhere as bad is it used to be, but all the defenses are still there. I scored a 28 on the PCL-R, I have an IQ of 117, and yet, I'm my own worst enemy a lot of the times. Hitler was said to be a lot of things, but BPD is the most common diagnosis that the vast majority of psychoanalysts point to. Yes, they say he has narcissistic and paranoid traits, but his primary problem was BPD. Anyone with even a moderate knowledge of the subject would agree. Hitler had the anger and rages, the unstable moods, difficult interpersonal relationships, and the black or white thinking (that is an obvious one when you think of Hitler). --]] 22:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
:::There you are, the fact that you have some acceptance and insight into your BPD is consistent with being egodystonic (although I think BPD can be egosyntonic and/or egodystonic). Not sure why you are keen to align yourself with having the same affliction as Hitler, who I think was entirely egosyntonic and had zero insight into his mental condition.--] (]) 22:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
::::I'm not trying to align anyone with myself, I simply know what this disorder is like firsthand. Before I was diagnosed, I had no insight nor did I have any awareness. I do now, but I still revert to the same defenses and I still struggle interpersonally due to that. The only difference is that now I know I have BPD. What I am saying is that BPD, NPD and AsPD are just different "breeds" of psychopathy. They share the same general traits, all score very high on the PCL (the DBT group I used to attend, there was 12 of us and 5 had been administered the PCL-R - all five had scores over 25, including myself). I cannot talk about some of my inner thoughts and feelings, simply because I would likely get locked up in a psychiatric ward. The point I'm trying to get across is that behind the face of a human, dark thoughts are a recurring theme with me. Fascination and fixations with things that anyone would probably think is nuts. For every BPD, NPD, etc that you meet, there is always something dark lurking inside that head. Call them fantasies, but they are there. --]] 22:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


Edit summary content is visible in:
==Disambiguation link notification for April 29==
{{Div col|"cols"=2}}
* ]
* ]
* ]s
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{Div col end}}
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 15:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for May 11==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
== Peer ==


== Your help desk questions ==
I undid your revision to the article on "peer"—- only because no one searching on "peer" is likely to be searching for "peer victimization". Please don't take personally, just a matter of clarification. <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 12:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
:You have now reverted my edit-- twice-- with justifications that don't match the behavior. I explained that I made my edits because people searching on "peer" aren't going to be looking for "peer victimization" (whereas some of them may very well be looking for "Peter" or "pe'er" and either not get the spelling right or not know how to spell the particular word they are looking for). In this sense, "peer victimization" is unlike any of the other entries. I am going to remove the entry for "peer victimization" once more, and ask you to address this issue here on your talk page before reverting my edit once again (at which point we will have entered into an edit war, something I have no interest in doing). Thanks. <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 20:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


You have .— ]&nbsp;• ]&nbsp;• ]&nbsp;• 20:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
== Thanks for your tireless work on the psychology articles. ==
:And .— ]&nbsp;• ]&nbsp;• ]&nbsp;• 21:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


== Alexander technique and relationship to other somatic education methods ==
Hi, Penbat,


Hello Penbat, I see you've been making some improvements to the ] article and overall I agree with your changes. I noticed your edit summary that says that you can't see how Alexander Technique relates to Rolfing and Systema. Rolfing is a form of Somatic Education (see ]) which relies on more hands-on contact for some of the movement education aspects but essentially they seem to be working from a similar set of ideas about how the human body functions best. Alexander Technique was a big influence on Feldenkrais, and Moshe Feldenkrais was a contemporary and friend of Ida Rolf. There's evidence that they cross-pollinated ideas quite a bit. As to Systema, I too noticed that link recently and hadn't ever heard of it so I read the article. It seems to be a martial art that is very Somatics-based. I'm actually going to point it out to the other editors on the Somatics article and see if they want to include it there - my only hesitation is whether it is notable enough to bother; the fact that I never heard of it gives me pause as I'm not unfamiliar with martial arts. Anyway, I'm going to reinstate those links for now and we can continue the conversation if you like. Cheers, --] (]) 18:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
I've seen you do a lot of good edits on articles that are on my watchlist, so I thought I would say hello. I see from your user page that you have a deep interest in the psychology articles and have contributed to many of them. Recently, I am setting up multiple user sandbox pages to do deep dives into the references and structure of most of the articles on human intelligence and IQ tests. (In general, anything within the scope of the nascent ], which I also hope to revise extensively, might be touched by my project, but I will especially be looking at about two dozen articles, of which a good half are tightly related the current ] article you just edited today.) I'd be delighted to have you check my work in the sandboxes before I commit sections of drafts or whole new article drafts to mainspace. Like you, I'd be delighted to see every Misplaced Pages article about psychology topics reviewed by experts for accuracy, balance, and good sourcing. Please feel free to let me know at any time how you think I am doing. -- ] (], ]) 00:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks for kind words. I generally concentrate on abuse-related psychology topics, IQ is generally more on the periphery of my sphere of interest (although I am interested in social and emotional intelligence). I dont mind scanning your sandboxes but my comments may be more about formatting and presentation than the factual content.--] (]) 07:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
==Merge discussion for ]==
] An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been '''proposed for a ]''' with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going ], and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote --> <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Disambiguation link notification for June 14== ==Disambiguation link notification for June 10==


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


==I AM SO sorry==
== Stafford Hospital Scandal ==
How did I miss your message to my talk page?! Of course I am interested in that article. There was a tag at the top about original research. That can't possibly be true, can it? There is so much out there on the abuse of power in relationships that an author of research is very unlikely to have put in material. I'll get to work right away. It will be a way to work out some of my own issues!
:Best Regards, ] (]) 23:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


OK thanks - the article tries to cover power and control in all abusive contexts but at the same time draw out some common features, for example ] and ] where the abuser entices the abused with gifts etc if they comply but punishes them if they rebel. Enticing the abused is a big part of "grooming". Child abuse grooming etc is entirely missing from ]. I don't think the tags are entirely justified.--] (]) 07:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Please explain why you keep undoing my edits to the Stafford Hospital Scandal page?


== The have and the have nots article ==
I am trying to update the page with factually correct information, rather than the just what the press reported. I suggest your read the Francis report before making unqualified edits.


Could you please fix the format of the information table from the very top of the article please. In '''starring''' the listing is out of order. Also, in the character table list, Mitch l, played by Brett davis is only listed as main in season 4, when he was recurring in season 3. I can't do it l, because I only edit with a phone and need a new computer or computer repairment. Please respond back or just do it, because others ignored my messages and never did ] (]) 21:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
] (]) 10:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Mertinuk


:What order do you want it in ? --] (]) 21:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for August 23==


Just leave it like it is, but just make sure in the starring list, theyre names are listed straight and go to the "cast and character section" and add Mitch as recurring in season three on the character table ] (]) 00:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


==Disambiguation link notification for July 27==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
==Disambiguation link notification for September 16==


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


==Disambiguation link notification for September 14==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
==Disambiguation link notification for October 8==


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


=="Treatment of sexual assault victims"==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


Hi, Thanks for your edits! I have a question about changing the title of the article from "Post-assault treatment of victims of sexual assault".
== Psychology articles ==


Actually, I don't like the old title or the new one. I agree that the old title is long. And I don't like the word "treatment" suggests "medical treatment" and not all of the other things that occur after the assault.
One of my responsibilities at Wiki Ed is going to be doing just what you suggested to Sage - coming up with gaps in coverage that we can encourage instructors to have their classes work on. So I really appreciate your suggestions. If you're interested, I would also be interested in working with you further to identify gaps in our coverage in psychology areas. ] (]) 17:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks. Everyday concepts sometimes get overlooked in favour of more obscure topics. I would be glad to help. Another common concept in poor shape I can think of is ]. --] (]) 18:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
:I have seen recommendations that students look at ] (eg ]) or articles with Stub or Start status when selecting an assignment. Although some of those are worth creating/expanding, the majority are obscure or niche. Important "C-class" articles often get overlooked especially those rated as "high-importance". For example ] and ] are both rated "C-class" and "high-importance". ] is actually "Start-class" and "high-importance". However, grading of articles has often not been done reliably or consistently - ] is "C-class" and "mid-importance", ] is "Start-class" and "mid-importance" and ] is "C-class" and "mid-importance" but they still in my view need urgent attention.--] (]) 08:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
::Thank you so much! I just got a request for articles to edit in psychology; your additions to that list were very timely. Hopefully it results in some improvement to those articles. ] (]) 14:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


I want the article to provide a list of all things (positive and negative) that a victim of sexual assault would have to deal with AFTER the assault. I like having the "Post-assault' in the title as it notifies the reader that the article is exclusively focused on what occurs after the assault.
== Hi, can you make a comment about my new project Encyclopine.org ==


Perhaps a better title would be "Scrutiny and mistreatment of sexual assault victims" or "Post-assault mistreatment of sexual assault victims" What do you think? Any suggestions?
hi,
Hi, can you make a comment about my new project ]?


Any other comments are appreciated. I plan to make a few more additions to the article (including police interview).
==Disambiguation link notification for November 21==


Thanks! User:WSDavitt (])
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


:I can see the ambiguity with the word "treatment". I personally dont see that "Post-assault" adds anything useful. Anyway this should be discussed on the talk page. I have reverted for now.--] (]) 08:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
:]
::added a link pointing to ]


== Abuse ==
:]
::added a link pointing to ]


Thanks for helping with the ] article. Can you help with the problem noted in, ]? ] (]) 11:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
:]
::added a link pointing to ]


:Sorry, the article is a bit on the periphery of my interests.--] (]) 12:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
:]
:I am more interested in the generalities of abuse than getting bogged down in specifics.--] (]) 16:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
::added a link pointing to ]
== Reference errors on 25 October ==


] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:
:]
*On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | )
::added a link pointing to ]
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can .
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
:Fixed.--] (]) 08:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


== ] ==
:]
::added a link pointing to ]


Per Refpunc, {{tq|Any punctuation (see exceptions below) ''must'' precede the ref tags.}} If you look at the examples given, you will see examples that have references in the middle of the text and the end.<br>
:]
{{tq|The ref tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies}}. You have already done this... Refs in the sentence applies to everything before the ref. Refs at the end of the sentence applies to everything since the first refs.<br>
::added a link pointing to ]
Style guides say refs before punctuation or after, but never intermixed.<br>
Been fixing these for 5 years. Every Misplaced Pages article follows REFPUNC except 31 articles due to templates issues. ] (]) 18:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


== November 2016 ==
:]
] Hello. Thank you for ] to ].
::added a link pointing to ]


{{The edit-summary field}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 23:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


I noticed your recent edit to ] does not have an ].&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
==Disambiguation link notification for December 10==


Edit summary content is visible in:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
{{Div col|"cols"=2}}
* ]
* ]
* ]s
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{Div col end}}
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}.
Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 08:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


== Collaboration ==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


Hi Penbat. Given that you seem to be usually a collaborative person on the WP project, may I ask you your views on Edit Summaries?
== your funny 2011 comment in Talk:Humour ==
Thanks, ] (]) 14:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
"humour can also be used by bad people such as psychos to deflect criticism - thus trivialising an awkward situation for them."
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
Now that you've grown a little, do you still believe that psychos are bad people? <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== Removal of templates ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> --] ] 15:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
] Please do not remove ] from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tdel2 --> ] (]) 19:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
:'''Note''' that I am completing the AfD nomination of behalf of an anon IP editor as a courtesy and do not necessarily share their opinion of the article. I reserve the right to offer opinions of my own at a later date. --] ] 15:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


== ]: Voting now open! ==
== Codependency ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Penbat. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Hi. Wanted to see if we can sort out this section on narcissism together. I struggle with this section ('''''') and the earlier versions of this article ('''''') which disproportionately (length) characterize codependency in terms of narcissism. I suggest that this material is more appropriately suited for the NPD article. I noticed that others have questioned this, too ('''''')


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I think Cermak ('''''') provides the most clinically dependable characterization of the transactional dynamics at play. Enmeshment in relationships extends equally to the chemically dependent, personality disordered, other co ‐ dependent, and/or impulse ‐ disordered individuals. The write up should reflect this balance.


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I drafted this (below). Can we work with something brief and to the point similar to this?
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/15&oldid=750692309 -->
== Appropriately listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Appropriately'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
== Appropriateness listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Appropriateness'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


== AfD close ==
* '''Narcissist personality disorder'''. Codependents of ] as sometimes referred to as co-narcissists.(1) Narcissists, with their ability to get others to buy into their vision and help them make it a reality, seek and attract partners who will put others' need before their own.(2) Codependents can provide the narcissist with an obsequious, unthreatening audience - the perfect backdrop.(3) Among the reciprocally locking interactions of the pair, are the way the narcissist has an overpowering need to feel important and special, and the co-dependent has a strong need to help others feel that way.
: Rappoport, Alan, PhD.
: Simon Crompton, ''All About Me: Loving a Narcissist'' (London 2007) p. 157 and p. 235
: Crompton, p. 31


Hey there Penbat, I went ahead and closed ] just to get it over with. I may not have expressed it well in my close statement, but I think the best thing to do is exactly what you suggested in the discussion - copy and paste your work from ] to the article, and then move it. Does that make sense? Thanks for your work on this! --] (]) 00:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
] (]) 17:07, 5 January 2015 (UTC)<br><br>


Thanks very much {{u|Cerebellum}}. I was almost losing the will to live.--] (]) 10:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
:Haha that AfD went on way too long ;) --] (]) 23:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


== Happy New Year, Penbat! ==
:There seems to be no shortage of book https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=codependancy+narcisism&gws_rd=ssl#q=codependency+narcissism&hl=en&tbm=bks&start=10 and academic journal http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=codependency+narcissism links between codependency and narcissism.--] (]) 19:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)<br><br>
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;height:173px;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);<!--
-->" class="plainlinks">]]
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}}
'''Penbat''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
<br />] (] - ]) 20:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}


== Happy New Year ==
:: '''Thanks for getting back'''. Are you good to go with my proposed edit/balance? Or do you have an alternative that is short and to the point (encyclopedic) that we an look at?


Hi Penbat, thanks for your New Year wishes and I hope you too are having a good one. Your message made me wonder whether there ought not be some mention of the annual firework event in the ] article. Any thoughts?--] (]) 06:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
:: Also thanks for the thought provoking challenge. I'm not sure book count on Google is the appropriate metric to resolve the issue of balance and priority. Cermak is the one that clinically profiled codependency across multiple conditions and got a DSM style definition through peer review. This is very significant. There are also the 11 million copies in circulation of Woititz, Norwood, and Beattie's work - clearly the defining voices in the public. But even using book count on Google, relegates narcissism/codependency at the bottom of the list. '''While narcissism has a large codependent component, codependency is not largely about narcissism.'''


There are reliable sources out there. ]--] (]) 06:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
:::* 15,300 citations for family/codependency
:::* 14,000 citations for alcoholism/codependency
:::* 5,600 citations for substance/codependency
:::* 2,500 citations for ocd/codependency
:::* 2,320 citations for adhd/codependency
:::* 2,300 citations for borderline/codependency
:::* 1,600 citations for narcissism/codependency (3.6% of total)


Thanks {{u|Ykraps}}, I am sure a mention is justifed and that source is reliable enough. Incidentally I caught some of the reenactment of the Battle of Mudeford a few monhs ago at Mudeford Quay. It wasnt that exciting but local history guru Mike Andrews was there and interjected interesting historical facts. That might have been worth mentioning in ] but I have not found any reliable source. --] (]) 09:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
] (]) 23:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)<br><br>


:I just thought a short sentence or two, but I'm having difficulty deciding where it should go. I wonder if there's enough going on to justify a small culture section?
::: Discussion relocated to talk page.<br>
:I didn't see the re-enactment, which is a shame as I would've been interested. Incidentally, do you think the mention of the Ship in Distress as ''"...actively involved in the Battle of Mudeford"'', is a mistake? I don't know of any involvement. The S-I-D has connections to both Ma Sillar and John Streeter but this was at a different time. At the time, Hannah Sillar was landlady of the Haven pub (not the one currently there) which was the scene of a shoot-out during the battle. So may be there is some confusion there?--] (]) 10:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
] (]) 16:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


:Presumably you've noticed that Mudeford Sea Scouts HQ is called ''Orestes'' after the naval cutter ]. Might also be worth mentioning as it's on the recreation ground.--] (]) 10:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
== Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sonia Poulton ==


:Looks like the ''Christchurch Heritage Festival'' is set to become an annual event.]--] (]) 10:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
In your nomination, you write "Creator of article may have a conflict of interest by being related to subject." Has this supposed COI been raised anywhere? I can't find any evidence of it being raised, and it seems questionable to me to make an assertion like that without even asking the contributor whether it is true. Incidentally, as a matter of policy, creation by someone with a COI isn't of itself grounds for deletion as far as I'm aware. ] (]) 08:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
:That's an incidental point in the AFD, not one of the main points. Also I say "MAY have a conflict of interest" - i'm not making a firm assertion.--] (]) 10:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
::Its an assertion that shouldn't have been made at all - if you have evidence, provide it. If you don't, retract it. ] (]) 02:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)


Cheers {{u|Ykraps}}, I dont have the motivation to do more local history work on Wiki at present. I respect your judgement so do whatever you think is best. This was used as the Ship In Distress Wiki source: http://www.smuggling.co.uk/gazetteer_s_13.html --] (]) 10:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
== Dangers of sitting ==


:That's okay, I understand perfectly; I have other interests on Misplaced Pages too. When I'm at a loose end, I'll take another look. In the meantime here are some pictures ]--] (]) 10:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey,


== ] copyright problem ==
I've done a 95% rewrite of ] () and I've included the two links you'd added to the Talk page. It would be great if you could review the new version and add anything else you know. When you find time. Thanks. ] (]) 15:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
:Thanks. It looks fine.--] (]) 16:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-010-0450-0, a copyright web page. All content you add to Misplaced Pages must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — ]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(]) 00:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for March 11==


==Alternative facts==
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
Seriously, man, if you're following this closely, ping me if some RS discusses it as a significant phrase, rather than as a news cycle event, or as an example of Trump's general problem with facts. I'm always open to evidence, and not averse to chaging an iVote when new sources are found. Cheers.] (]) 22:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


==New Article: ]==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
A reference for starting the article is . There are other references available. I am not very well versed to create an article myself. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Jobs / workplace == == Entitlement ==


Hi Penbat, thanks for your message on the NPD article talk page. I absolutely agree with you that the ] article needs to better represent other meanings of the word - it is too US-centric at the moment. I made a mistake when reading the entitlement article because at a glance it didn't seem relevant to entitlement in the sense of privilege/special treatment. ] (] |] | ]) 12:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Penbat, I saw you removed the link to ] (linked as "job control") from the ] with the reason ''(IMO Jobs template more apt as word "Job" more prominent than "workplace"'' and added it instead (linked as "control") to the ]. Yet apart the title (which visibly includes the expression "job"), the article mainly concerns the influence on what happens in the work environment (including the workplace) including the topic of workplace autonomy. These notions also quite close to the concept of ] which is currently already in the template "Aspects of workplaces". Therefore I propose to put it back to the "Aspects of workplaces" template, or – if not – to put there redirect ] (as "autonomy") into that template. What do you think? --] (]) 19:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
:I created ], ], ], ] and ]. Obviously that does not mean that they are "mine" but I need to try and explain the rationale behind creating them. The content of the templates overlaps a lot (also with ]) , that is why each template includes a link to all the other templates. The words "corporations", "organisations", "workplace", "jobs" and "occupations" are often quite interchangeable in the article titles. I could have just created categories for jobs, occupations, organisations, workplaces but I wanted to make it easy for readers to flip from one template to the other which was not so doable with categories. The determining factor behind which template an article goes into is primarily determined by which of the words "corporations", "organisations", "workplace", "jobs" or "occupations" are in the article title which is something concrete. A few of the articles have redirects with an alternative from "corporations", "organisations", "workplace", "jobs" or "occupations" but the article name was chosen to have prominence over the redirect names.--] (]) 20:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


::I see now which is the logic underlying the templates, and certainly it is important to maintain an over-all logic. Now in this particular case of a concept named "job control" which mainly concerns aspects of the workplace, the logic of using the words of the title leads to a suboptimal result. --] (]) 21:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


== Copying within Misplaced Pages requires proper attribution ==
:::Is it not self evident that anything in ] is to do with jobs in the context of the workplace ? I notice ] mentions ] and ]. ] says also known as ] which is a redirect, reinforcing my point that the words eg "occupational" & "job" etc are often interchangeable. ] says also known as ] which is a redirect. ] also has two short sentences on "workplace autonomy" - I think that it could also be called "job autonomy", "occupational autonomy" or "employee autonomy". It is all fairly arbitrary.--] (]) 22:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


] Thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into ]. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, ] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an ] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and ] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying--> If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — ]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(]) 01:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
::::Yes, I also see the dilemma as to these examples, and I think we agree that a subdivision of these topics is necessarily fairly arbitrary and not perfect. Looking at things from this angle, it would make sense to equip the article "job control/workplace autonomy/employee autonomy" with the respective relevant templates, so that the reader can browse the complete set of related topics. (The "Aspects of occupations" template seems to contain topics that lead in a rather different direction, so it is less relevant here.) The templates each collapse, so screen space is not much of an issue. Would that be acceptable to you? --] (]) 05:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for March 21==
:::::Workplace autonomy is just an aspect of job control covering two short sentences, it could just as easily have been called "job autonomy". Why "employee autonomy" ? Having multiple templates undermines the point that each template includes a link to the other templates anyway. You only normally put a template in an article if that article is actually in the template.--] (]) 10:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
== Eileen Chubb ==


It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Before you hit publish on ], can I suggest you fix up ]? Vast chunks of it lack inline citations, the tone is highly formal, and a big chunk of it reads like a press release. ] (]) 16:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


== Authority bias ==
:Are you sure you are looking at the right article. I cant see any vast chunks lacking inline citations ?
* lede paragraph - doesnt need cites as it is a summary of the rest of the article
* It was set up as a charity with herself as director in 2003 - listed on company check website.http://companycheck.co.uk/director/909243487/EILEEN--CHUBB/directors-secretaries#people i would have used it as a cite but it seems to be blacklisted by Wiki.
* In 2008 she released the book Beyond the Facade which described her experiences. - This is self evident, you can find it listed on Amazon
* From 2012 to 2013 she was charity director at Whistleblowers UK. - listed on company check website.http://companycheck.co.uk/director/909243487/EILEEN--CHUBB/directors-secretaries#people i would have used it as a cite but it seems to be blacklisted by Wiki.


--] (]) 16:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC) See my comments on ]--] (]) 19:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
:. Yes, leads don't need citations when they're the summary of the rest of the article, but that isn't a summary of the rest of the article - the rest of the article consists entirely of an "Edna's Law" section and a list of appearances. I note that you've since added more citations; thank you for this :). However:
# Change.org is not a reliable citation. Ditto The Whistler, which appears to be a wordpress blog; if the "Edna's Law" proposal is at all notable I'd ask you to find some more reliable sources than these. If you can't...well, it's probably not worth including.
# The listing of a book on Amazon is not something we really use for sourcing. JFYI.
# "She has an interest in all sectors but the care home sector in particular. She campaigns for new legislation to replace the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 to improve whistleblowing rights in the United Kingdom." is still uncited.
# The list of whistleblowing reports is...non-standard; normally the expectation is that a bibliography section will contain published works. If these are published, fair enough, but they probably don't deserve their own section: some external links would be enough. ] (]) 06:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


==Proposed article rename==
== March 2015 ==
I've proposed to rename ] to ]. I'm letting you know since you contributed to the article. ] (]) 23:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

== Dominic Frisby ==

Finally live: ]. ]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>] 23:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
:Thx :-) --] (]) 08:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

== Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors! ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
:''please help translate this message into your local language via ''
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" |'''The 2016 Cure Award'''
|-
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |In 2016 you were one of the ] across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from ] for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a ] whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining ''']''', there are no associated costs.
|}

Thanks again :-) -- ] along with the rest of the team at ''']''' 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Doc James@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Top_Medical_Editors_2016&oldid=16683386 -->

==Refs==

Any better quality references for ]? ] (] · ] · ]) 21:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

:There are quite a few self-help books on "no contact". "Grey rock" is such a recent concept that it gets mentioned in many websites but not many books as yet. http://www.smh.com.au/comment/how-to-deal-with-a-narcissist-like-donald-trump-20170202-gu3yzq.html mentions grey rock in some detail. Both concepts have a lot of coverage on Google and Youtube. Both concepts deserve to be on Misplaced Pages because of their notability. Anecdotally these concepts are often found to be useful by people who use them. "Disengaging from an abuser" is an important topic. It is associated with ] in its modern sense which is an evolving field. The fact that academic studies have not covered this area much has caused a vacuum. It would be almost impossible to do hard science in this field anyway. Popular psychology manages to plug gaps in academic research eg ], ], ], ] and ].--] (]) 21:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a ], {{#if:|at ]|such as at ]}}. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Undeserving+poor|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-repost-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 21:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

== Flying Monkeys ==

When I say "flying monkeys" followed by "abuse by proxy" I feared vandalism. I acted in haste and I apologize; I restored the text. ]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 21:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
:OK cheers :-) --] (]) 21:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 16:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>1. ] 2. ] 3. fails ] 4. sourcing fails ]</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span>; ]</span> 12:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for creating ] ] (]) 19:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
|}
:By the way, I added a question on the talkpage.] (]) 19:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
::Cheers.--] (]) 19:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
:::For sure. I was going to create ] but found this article instead, so I created a redirect!] (]) 19:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

==] has been nominated for discussion==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. -- ] <sup>(])</sup> 04:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

==DYK for Fit in or fuck off==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the phrase "''']'''" {{ndash}} an organizational paradigm {{ndash}} has conceptually been appropriated to other contexts?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Penbat. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=813413978 -->
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 01:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

== Re: Malasana Image ==

Hi Penbat,

Thank you for the message regarding the Malasana image.

I have found this one on Wikimedia commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:M%C4%81l%C4%81sana_yoga_pose.jpg

Hope this helps!

Milena.

] (]) 13:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

== Stour or Avon? ==

Hi Penbat and a belated Happy New Year to you. I'm glad to see you're still plugging away here. I came across this photo over at ], {{File:River Stour, Christchurch - geograph.org.uk - 1761325.jpg}}. It looks like the Avon to me. What do you think?--] (]) 06:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

:Off hand I dont know the answer to your question. Happy New Year to you as well and good work on historic ships. Personally I have done all the "must dos" I can think of. I probably got the most satisfaction from ] - we all do some element of squatting every day especially just to lower the body but oddly it has generally been airbrushed out. Most people have no idea of its versatility. I am from now on keeping a relatively low profile on Misplaced Pages - just keeping an eye on things. Misplaced Pages is enjoyable but it can also have its stresses. On the local history front I have checked out some obvious historic features of Boscombe: remnants of Victoria Hospital, neighbouring water tower, old coaching inn, derelict Boscombe railway station, the Boscombe Devil. Can you think of other prominemt historical Boscombe features that can still be seen ?--] (]) 01:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

::I think the photograph was taken from Convent Walk, just downstream of the Town Bridge, where the fishing punt is, looking towards the far bank. I didn't say so initially because I wanted see if you thought so too without me leading you. I'll have a look when I'm next in town, to make sure.

::There are a few interesting buildings in Boscombe. You might like the old technical college (896 Christchurch Rd, Pokesdown) and nearby, the old match factory in Hannington Place. Unfortunately, the old trolleybus depot, next to The Bell, appears to have been demolished but there is still the old tram, and later, trolleybus depot in Southcotte Road which is still used by the council today. Percy Florence Shelley's house in Shelley Park is still there.] It was at one time an art college but is now flats, I think. However, there is a pharmacy there (bizarrely) so you can have a peek inside. Not far from there, in College Road, is a school which used to be Lord somebody or other's (name escapes me for the moment) home. If you really want a challenge, you could try finding the site of Southbourne Pier and the houses that were built along the sea front, next to it.]] I think I know where it was but I'm just guessing. Incidentally, did you know there were plans to re-open Boscombe East station?]--] (]) 14:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Help! Am I going fucking crackers? Please tell me this isn't the Avon ] and this isn't the Stour! ]--] (]) 10:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

== ] nominated for deletion ==

] has been nominated for deletion. Since you had some involvement with its development, you might want to participate in ], if you have not already done so. &nbsp; &nbsp; &mdash; '']''&nbsp; &nbsp; 04:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

== Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors! ==
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
:''please help translate this message into your local language via ''
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" |'''The 2017 Cure Award'''
|-
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |In 2017 you were one of the ] across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from ] for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a ] whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining ''']''', there are no associated costs.
|}

Thanks again :-) -- ] along with the rest of the team at '''] 02:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)'''
</div>

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Penbat. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 -->

== Thanks... ==

...for that Airsoft edit, but I will have to revert you on the squatting article. There is no reason why this should be an a-typical article, full of useless pictures, trivia, and original research. (Seriously, ? And I can go on with listing unreliable sources.) Thanks, ] (]) 16:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

:I fundamentally disagree with you {{ping|Drmies}}, you will have to take it to the talk page. I agree with your campaign to delete trivia from articles but you do not understand this is not one of them. In fact it is the complete opposite. Much of it covers every day actions everybody on the planet does every day, nothing like the trivia you are currently deleting. You do not understand the subject. Some of it happens to be culture specific. It is a very atypical article for which WP:IGNORE largely applies. But there are quite a few articles with more images than this. And you are missing the point singling out which has its own article ] and not one of mine. --] (]) 16:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
::I don't think there is much to understand about the subject. BTW, can you explain what the 2-liter coke bottle full of vodka is for? I certainly do not know that, and the source (haha, "source") doesn't make it very clear. ] (]) 16:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
:::I honestly have no idea what you are on about and you obviously have no interest in understanding the subject of squatting. IMO your stance is entirely POV. I cannot think of anything more unrelated than squatting and "can you explain what the 2-liter coke bottle full of vodka is for". {{ping|Drmies}}--] (]) 21:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
:::You flippantly introduced the section title "Squatting while peeing or pooping" into the article which is slang, not mentioned in the body text, and contravenes MOS:HEAD. Even worse "pooping" is US specific slang not normally used outside the US. I have corrected it. If I look hard enough I will probably find other errors. You seem to have a flippant attitude to the whole article.{{ping|Drmies}}--] (]) 22:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
::::Your article was ridiculous. "Pooping", a fairly common word, is less out of place than your 50k of verbosity. Actually, I was kind of wondering why there was so much interest in peeing and pooping while squatting; the article seemed a bit bottom heavy, so to speak. ] (]) 00:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
::::Wait. '''YOU''' are asking about the 2-liter bottle of vodka? YOU introduced that with your citation from Urbandictionary: "basiclly all you need is vodka in a 2 liter bottle of coke". Granted, that doesn't mean the bottle is ''full'' of vodka. ] (]) 00:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

== September 2019 ==

Hello Penbat,

Please read ] until you understand it, and please avoid that type of behavior. You may also benefit from reading ]. If you continue on the path you've taken recently, things may not end well for you. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. ] ] 07:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

==] has been nominated for discussion==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 16:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 -->
== "Keyboard warrior" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Keyboard warrior'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

== Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed ==

Hello '''Penbat'''! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to ] may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the ]. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! <span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">] <sup>]</sup></span></span> 17:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I would like to present this barnstar as a sign of thanks for your efforts in trying to help and improve Misplaced Pages. You have been a valuable and trusted contributor over the years. Regards, ] (] - ]) 16:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
|}
== "SquatForChange" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:courier;font-size:90%"> <span class="nowrap">-- ]</span></span><span class="nowrap"> (she/they)</span> &#124; <span class="nowrap">]</span> 07:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


== Nomination for merger of ] ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 07:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Please be particularly aware that ] states:
== "Indifference to others' suffering" listed at ] ==
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
]
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 12:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''.
== "Lack of guilt in psychopaths" listed at ] ==
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> Regards ] (]) 03:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 12:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
== "Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
== "Superficial sympathy" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 14:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== SPA / COI ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi Penbat
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for deletion==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
I work on issues related to conflicts of interest here in Misplaced Pages, and on health related articles. Here, those two things are intersecting.
==] has been nominated for deletion==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Your account is what we call a "single purpose account" (see ]) on the basis of that, and the nature of your edits, I am providing you notice of our COI guideline and Terms of Use. Please read the following - I have a question for you at the end.
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Managing the conflicts of interest of Misplaced Pages editors is important for maintaining the integrity of Misplaced Pages and the public's trust in it. Additionally, companies or organizations that edit Misplaced Pages on their own behalf in violation of the Terms of Use and our COI guideline, can get bad press for that. Please see ] for some examples.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
] Hello, Penbat. We ] your contributions to Misplaced Pages, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things ] on Misplaced Pages, you may have a ] or close connection to the subject.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
All editors are required to comply with Misplaced Pages's ] content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by ] and writing with as little bias as possible.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 20:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
*'''Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating''' articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
*'''Avoid linking''' to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see ]).
*'''Exercise great caution''' so that you do not accidentally breach Misplaced Pages's content policies.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to ], ], and ]. Note that Misplaced Pages's ] '''require disclosure''' of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 03:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for renaming==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 05:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see ]. Thank you.{{#if:|&nbsp;] (]) 18:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)}}<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->]<!-- Template:uw-coi -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:Oh Yeah cover.jpg==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
===Questions===
==] has been nominated for deletion==
Would you please you please disclose your relationship with scrambler therapy? Some examples (not exhaustive) of what I mean are - a scientist that worked on developing it, a clinician who tested it, an employee or founder of a company selling devices to administer it or that administers it, or someone hired by any of those.. lots of ways you ~could~ be related. Please let us know. Thanks. ] (]) 18:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
: please reply here, to the issues raised here. This is a separate issue from whether the article should be deleted or not. Thanks! ] (]) 19:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12#Legal abuse}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 06:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12#Legal abuses}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 06:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9#Sorority squat}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> –'''] <small><sup>]</sup></small>''' 17:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9#Monkey squat}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> –'''] <small><sup>]</sup></small>''' 17:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 07:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:56, 21 May 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Penbat has not edited Misplaced Pages since September 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5


Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!

Hello Penbat! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukini 15:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Misplaced Pages rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Kukini 15:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi / Sock-puppet hunt

Relocated from (talk) Wiki-psyc.
I notice you have copied elements of my user page onto your page. Anyway you seem to have hit the ground running. You are obviously a seasoned Wiki editor not a novice. Please provide full details of your previous Wikipdia accounts.--Penbat (talk) 08:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


Information icon Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User:Wiki-psyc can easily be misinterpreted. Misplaced Pages is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. This is the only Misplaced Pages account I have had. Admin can verify. Your comment has been removed. Thanks. Wiki-psyc (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)


Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki-psyc. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Misplaced Pages. Filing a frivolous sockpuppet claim and stalking an editor is harassment. This is notice to stop.
Investigation file: Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki-psyc
Wiki-psyc (talk) 16:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki-psyc, Penbat was acting in WP:Good faith. It's quite easy to see that you are not a WP:Newbie. Showing up editing like you've been editing Misplaced Pages for years is obviously going to result in suspicion of your account. I immediately pegged you as a WP:Sock as well. Either that, or as a user returning under a WP:Clean start rationale, whether or not that rationale is entirely in line with WP:Clean start. When I saw that you were commenting in the WP:Sockpuppet investigation that Penbat had started on you, I decided not to comment since that report was not solid. But now that I recently saw you again, this time at this article, I decided to state that acting like Penbat is wrong to be suspicious of you is incorrect. Very experienced Misplaced Pages editors usually are suspicious of new accounts that edit the way you do (meaning in a seasoned way), and with good reason; see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive894#Spaghetti07205 as a recent example. Just know that if you are trying to help Misplaced Pages, so is Penbat.
If you reply to me about this, I would prefer that you reply here at this talk page instead of at mine, so that the discussion stays jointed instead of disjointed. Flyer22 (talk) 21:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Flyer22, does bringing a member before a tribunal after their first edit and on the grounds that it "exceeded expectations" qualify as WP:Good faith or WP:BITE? I'll respect your opinion that it is with "good reason" and that it "helps Misplaced Pages". It is, however, not something I would recommend or endorse. If I were concerned about chronic troublemakers that resurface with new identities, I'd wait rather than error. Troublemakers generally recreate their controversies, in time, and give themselves away.
With respect to Covert incest, I just documented the work. Let's talk/work there.
Wiki-psyc (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Wiki-psyc, how I handle potentially problematic returning editors is addressed on my user page; how I go about that works.
As for the Covert incest article, I'm not especially interested in it and I wasn't stating that you'd done anything wrong there. Flyer22 (talk) 01:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Wiki-psyc, for a relative newbie who only joined Wiki earlier this year, and has made less than 100 article edits, your ability to cite WP policies is at the advanced level. I've been on Wiki for 10 years and i'm not quite at your level. You managed to issue a Template:Uw-harass2 on my talk page (see above) after having done only four article edits. "Troublemakers generally recreate their controversies, in time, and give themselves away" - what lead you to deduce that ? --Penbat (talk) 08:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

You need to cease the bullying, harassment and personal attacks. I've asked you politely on a number of occasions. You have been told by the administrators on two occasions that your accusations are unfounded. Please conduct yourself professionally. I will file a harassment report next time you do this. I have asked the administrators to intervene are restore neutrality to the WP:RM
Wiki-psyc (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Bullying culture

Hi there, just wanted to drop you a line about your reversion of my edit on Bullying culture. I never change quotes without checking the source, but this one was uncheckable, and I actually couldn't tell if it was supposed to be a direct quote or not. Since the quoted phrase was so brief, in the middle of a much longer sentence, I thought it might have been just a turn of phrase that the Wiki author had put in quotes for being rather colloquial. A way of saying "so to speak." For that reason, I thought it might as well be grammatically correct.

Anyway, no big deal, just wanted to let you know I hadn't changed it lightly or unthinkingly, nor was I trying to Americanize the language - I try to stay sensitive to that. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Medworxx

Help! This page has twice been speedily deleted as being promotional. I agree it's very positive, but I haven't found any negative coverage. In fact the company's press releases are less flattering than the stuff which comes from independent sources. Can you help me - either to make it less promotional, or to defend it as it is? I can't see what else I can do to it. I've removed the material which came from the company's press releases.Rathfelder (talk) 21:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry cant help - rather outside my sphere of interest and knowledge.--Penbat (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bullycide

This article was moved to a rather different title. I have just reverted the move and returned it to the original title. I wonder if you have any thoughts you would care to leave on the talk page. Fiddle Faddle 18:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

recent notification

What led you to jump to the conclusion that my edit was vandalism? I even thanked you for your prior edit... Void burn (talk) 23:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Why on earth did you undo my revert then ? --Penbat (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Templates and see alsos

I see many, many complaints about the templates. We need the same links in so many places? I doubt it. The text at WP:SIDEBAR says that the purpose of templates is to avoid long "see also" sections. Also, if a title is linked in article text then there's no need for it to be in "see also" too. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36 (talk) 10:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Also: WP:ALSO: "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes." Do you acknowledge that guideline? 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36 (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Repeated text, #2

Bullying culture #In the workplace

Main articles: Organisational culture and Workplace bullying

Bullying is seen to be prevalent in organisations where employees and managers feel that they have the support, or at least implicitly the blessing, of senior managers to carry on their abusive and bullying behaviour. Furthermore, new managers will quickly come to view this form of behaviour as acceptable and normal if they see others get away with it and are even rewarded for it.

When bullying happens at the highest levels, the effects may be far reaching. That people may be bullied irrespective of their organisational status or rank, including senior managers, indicates the possibility of a negative domino effect, where bullying may be cascaded downwards as the targeted supervisors might offload their own aggression on their subordinates. In such situations, a bullying scenario in the boardroom may actually threaten the productivity of the entire organisation.

Organizational culture#Bullying culture

Main articles: Bullying culture and Workplace bullying

Bullying is seen to be prevalent in organisations where employees and managers feel that they have the support, or at least implicitly the blessing, of senior managers to carry on their abusive and bullying behaviour. Furthermore, new managers will quickly come to view this form of behaviour as acceptable and normal if they see others get away with it and are even rewarded for it.

When bullying happens at the highest levels, the effects may be far reaching. That people may be bullied irrespective of their organisational status or rank, including senior managers, indicates the possibility of a negative ripple effect, where bullying may be cascaded downwards as the targeted supervisors might offload their own aggression on their subordinates. In such situations, a bullying scenario in the boardroom may actually threaten the productivity of the entire organisation.

Workplace bullying#Organizational culture

Main articles: Organizational culture and Bullying culture

Bullying is seen to be prevalent in organisations where employees and managers feel that they have the support, or at least implicitly the blessing, of senior managers to carry on their abusive and bullying behaviour. Furthermore, new managers will quickly come to view this form of behaviour as acceptable and normal if they see others get away with it and are even rewarded for it.

When bullying happens at the highest levels, the effects may be far reaching. That people may be bullied irrespective of their organisational status or rank, including senior managers, indicates the possibility of a negative domino effect, where bullying may be cascaded downwards as the targeted supervisors might offload their own aggression on their subordinates. In such situations, a bullying scenario in the boardroom may actually threaten the productivity of the entire organisation.

References

  1. ^ Salin D, Helge H “Organizational Causes of Workplace Bullying” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010) Cite error: The named reference "Salin D 2010" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  2. ^ Helge H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S “Organisational Effects of Workplace Bullying” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice (2010) Cite error: The named reference "Organisational" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

Discussion

Also: Talk:Narcissism#Repeated text: for a similar problem.

I'm confused. If the exact same text is in three articles, then none of those are the "main article". I suggest picking one and putting it there. Duplicate text like this clogs up articles and templates. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36 (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I've noticed other blocks of text that are reused across multiple articles as well. While it can make sense in some circumstances, there seems to be a pattern here. Maybe the way you're writing or compiling articles could be reviewed to reduce this rampant duplication of text. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36 (talk) 12:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
You may not be aware of this, but anytime text is copied from one article to another in WP, it's legally important to identify the source article in the edit summary. If you follow that rule, it'll be easier for everyone to track the flow. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:4060:393:581D:3D36 (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Please see the discussion to rename Bullycide

This appears on its talk page. Fiddle Faddle 12:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I dont have strong feelings either way.--Penbat (talk) 12:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
That is perfectly fine. I know that you care about the topic whatever its title. Fiddle Faddle 12:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Images on Setting boundaries

Diagram of Edward T. Hall's personal space reaction bubbles (1966), showing radius in feet

Respectfully, I added back the images on Setting boundaries. The images help readers to visualize this often misunderstood concept. They comply with the Image use policy and, conversely, the manner and reasons given for their deletion do not. It might help to compare the use of images in this article to those in the Exaggeration article which we both have been actively involved. Graphics are very subjective and tastes differ so this is not as clear cut as a fact citation. I'm amenable to constructively exploring alternative options that will aid the readers either here or on the article's talk page. Wiki-psyc (talk) 12:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Penbat. I'm returning my comment here (where it was originally posted). If you wish to host a discussion on the article talk page, please author one yourself. Please do not make posts on my behalf and with my signature. If you prefer to close the matter and discard my note, that's fine. Many thanks Wiki-psyc (talk) 13:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

madoff and Peter Foster

why on earth do you think these two do not fit the criteria for psychopathy or anti social personality ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Pizzon Lamb (talkcontribs) 23:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

I've protected the Peter Foster page. Looks like Pizzon Lamb started using an IP to do reverts. After some lovely name calling on my talk page and edit history, I've also blocked the IP. I've told them about WP:BLP and the need for refs, but that went over their head. Give a yell if you need any help. Bgwhite (talk) 08:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Cheers--Penbat (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mindfulness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Authenticity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

"true self" and "True Self"

Looks like some links and named may need to be checked:

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind acknowledgement of my Quality improvement efforts at Lie-to-children

Penbat,

Thank you for your kind acknowledgement of my Quality improvement efforts at Lie-to-children.

I very much appreciate your removal of the "{{notable}}" tag from the top of the article page.

Perhaps you could provide your comment and opinion at Talk:Lie-to-children#This_article_should_be_deleted_redirected. ?

Thanks again,

Cirt (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done, I've commented an update in that section, you may as well if you wish, but I think at this point, hopefully, the complaints about notability are more than adequately addressed by the direct improvements to the article, itself, and therefore, resolved. — Cirt (talk) 03:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your addition of my Quality improvement effort to the article Lie

Thank you for your addition of my Quality improvement effort to the article Lie.

Unfortunately, incoming links to the article Lie-to-children were removed from this article and many others all over Misplaced Pages.

Now that I've successfully embarked upon a Quality improvement project for the article Lie-to-children -- do you think this would be a good time to restore those incoming links to this article that were previously recently removed ?

Thank you for your attention to this matter,

Cirt (talk) 18:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done, I've added back the links. Hopefully, now that the article itself is improved, the links will remain in the future. — Cirt (talk) 03:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Health Select Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julie Cooper. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Physician has been nominated for discussion

Category:Physician, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Scott Alter (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


Hello! I removed Category:Physicians from a number of articles about medical associations and journals with names containing the word Physicians to which you added the category, as it is generally recommended to avoid characterizing by "a subject's name ... or by characteristics of the name" (see WP:SHAREDNAME). In addition, as a part of Category:People by occupation, Category:Physicians is a biographical category tree intended primarily for articles and lists about people, not organizations or other entities, which have their own category systems—e.g., Category:Medical associations and Category:Medical journals. It appears to me that you were attempting to convert Category:Physicians (a set category) to a topic category about the profession as a whole. Such changes potentially can affect hundreds or thousands of subcategorized articles, and so I urge you to propose all such changes at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion, where you can obtain feedback from other editors. If there is anything that I can to do assist you, or if you have any questions, please let me know at my talk page. Best, -- Black Falcon 03:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haptic communication, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haptics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ecosexuality does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Birthing chair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All fours. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk questions

You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

And another response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Alexander technique and relationship to other somatic education methods

Hello Penbat, I see you've been making some improvements to the Alexander Technique article and overall I agree with your changes. I noticed your edit summary that says that you can't see how Alexander Technique relates to Rolfing and Systema. Rolfing is a form of Somatic Education (see Somatics) which relies on more hands-on contact for some of the movement education aspects but essentially they seem to be working from a similar set of ideas about how the human body functions best. Alexander Technique was a big influence on Feldenkrais, and Moshe Feldenkrais was a contemporary and friend of Ida Rolf. There's evidence that they cross-pollinated ideas quite a bit. As to Systema, I too noticed that link recently and hadn't ever heard of it so I read the article. It seems to be a martial art that is very Somatics-based. I'm actually going to point it out to the other editors on the Somatics article and see if they want to include it there - my only hesitation is whether it is notable enough to bother; the fact that I never heard of it gives me pause as I'm not unfamiliar with martial arts. Anyway, I'm going to reinstate those links for now and we can continue the conversation if you like. Cheers, --Karinpower (talk) 18:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited So (sentence closer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page So and so. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I AM SO sorry

How did I miss your message to my talk page?! Of course I am interested in that article. There was a tag at the top about original research. That can't possibly be true, can it? There is so much out there on the abuse of power in relationships that an author of research is very unlikely to have put in material. I'll get to work right away. It will be a way to work out some of my own issues!

Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

OK thanks - the article tries to cover power and control in all abusive contexts but at the same time draw out some common features, for example reinforcement and operant conditioning where the abuser entices the abused with gifts etc if they comply but punishes them if they rebel. Enticing the abused is a big part of "grooming". Child abuse grooming etc is entirely missing from power and control in abusive relationships. I don't think the tags are entirely justified.--Penbat (talk) 07:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

The have and the have nots article

Could you please fix the format of the information table from the very top of the article please. In starring the listing is out of order. Also, in the character table list, Mitch l, played by Brett davis is only listed as main in season 4, when he was recurring in season 3. I can't do it l, because I only edit with a phone and need a new computer or computer repairment. Please respond back or just do it, because others ignored my messages and never did Zhyboo (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

What order do you want it in ? --Penbat (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Just leave it like it is, but just make sure in the starring list, theyre names are listed straight and go to the "cast and character section" and add Mitch as recurring in season three on the character table Zhyboo (talk) 00:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Groupthink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outgroup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychopathy in the workplace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

"Treatment of sexual assault victims"

Hi, Thanks for your edits! I have a question about changing the title of the article from "Post-assault treatment of victims of sexual assault".

Actually, I don't like the old title or the new one. I agree that the old title is long. And I don't like the word "treatment" suggests "medical treatment" and not all of the other things that occur after the assault.

I want the article to provide a list of all things (positive and negative) that a victim of sexual assault would have to deal with AFTER the assault. I like having the "Post-assault' in the title as it notifies the reader that the article is exclusively focused on what occurs after the assault.

Perhaps a better title would be "Scrutiny and mistreatment of sexual assault victims" or "Post-assault mistreatment of sexual assault victims" What do you think? Any suggestions?

Any other comments are appreciated. I plan to make a few more additions to the article (including police interview).

Thanks! User:WSDavitt (talk)

I can see the ambiguity with the word "treatment". I personally dont see that "Post-assault" adds anything useful. Anyway this should be discussed on the talk page. I have reverted for now.--Penbat (talk) 08:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Abuse

Thanks for helping with the Sexual abuse article. Can you help with the problem noted in, Talk:Sexual abuse#Latest additions? Proxima Centauri (talk) 11:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, the article is a bit on the periphery of my interests.--Penbat (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
I am more interested in the generalities of abuse than getting bogged down in specifics.--Penbat (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Fixed.--Penbat (talk) 08:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:REFPUNC

Per Refpunc, Any punctuation (see exceptions below) must precede the ref tags. If you look at the examples given, you will see examples that have references in the middle of the text and the end.
The ref tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies. You have already done this... Refs in the sentence applies to everything before the ref. Refs at the end of the sentence applies to everything since the first refs.
Style guides say refs before punctuation or after, but never intermixed.
Been fixing these for 5 years. Every Misplaced Pages article follows REFPUNC except 31 articles due to templates issues. Bgwhite (talk) 18:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Teacher does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Trafford09 (talk) 08:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Collaboration

Hi Penbat. Given that you seem to be usually a collaborative person on the WP project, may I ask you your views on Edit Summaries? Thanks, Trafford09 (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tone policing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tone policing is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tone policing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Finngall 15:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Note that I am completing the AfD nomination of behalf of an anon IP editor as a courtesy and do not necessarily share their opinion of the article. I reserve the right to offer opinions of my own at a later date. --Finngall 15:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Penbat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Appropriately listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appropriately. Since you had some involvement with the Appropriately redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Appropriateness listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Appropriateness. Since you had some involvement with the Appropriateness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

AfD close

Hey there Penbat, I went ahead and closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Isolation Techniques (Individual) just to get it over with. I may not have expressed it well in my close statement, but I think the best thing to do is exactly what you suggested in the discussion - copy and paste your work from User:Penbat/Isolation to facilitate abuse to the article, and then move it. Does that make sense? Thanks for your work on this! --Cerebellum (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much Cerebellum. I was almost losing the will to live.--Penbat (talk) 10:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Haha that AfD went on way too long ;) --Cerebellum (talk) 23:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Penbat!

Happy New Year!

Penbat,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year

Hi Penbat, thanks for your New Year wishes and I hope you too are having a good one. Your message made me wonder whether there ought not be some mention of the annual firework event in the Stanpit article. Any thoughts?--Ykraps (talk) 06:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

There are reliable sources out there. ]--Ykraps (talk) 06:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Ykraps, I am sure a mention is justifed and that source is reliable enough. Incidentally I caught some of the reenactment of the Battle of Mudeford a few monhs ago at Mudeford Quay. It wasnt that exciting but local history guru Mike Andrews was there and interjected interesting historical facts. That might have been worth mentioning in Battle of Mudeford but I have not found any reliable source. --Penbat (talk) 09:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

I just thought a short sentence or two, but I'm having difficulty deciding where it should go. I wonder if there's enough going on to justify a small culture section?
I didn't see the re-enactment, which is a shame as I would've been interested. Incidentally, do you think the mention of the Ship in Distress as "...actively involved in the Battle of Mudeford", is a mistake? I don't know of any involvement. The S-I-D has connections to both Ma Sillar and John Streeter but this was at a different time. At the time, Hannah Sillar was landlady of the Haven pub (not the one currently there) which was the scene of a shoot-out during the battle. So may be there is some confusion there?--Ykraps (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Presumably you've noticed that Mudeford Sea Scouts HQ is called Orestes after the naval cutter HMS Orestes (1781). Might also be worth mentioning as it's on the recreation ground.--Ykraps (talk) 10:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks like the Christchurch Heritage Festival is set to become an annual event.]--Ykraps (talk) 10:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Cheers Ykraps, I dont have the motivation to do more local history work on Wiki at present. I respect your judgement so do whatever you think is best. This was used as the Ship In Distress Wiki source: http://www.smuggling.co.uk/gazetteer_s_13.html --Penbat (talk) 10:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

That's okay, I understand perfectly; I have other interests on Misplaced Pages too. When I'm at a loose end, I'll take another look. In the meantime here are some pictures ]--Ykraps (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Narcissistic leadership copyright problem

I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-010-0450-0, a copyright web page. All content you add to Misplaced Pages must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Alternative facts

Seriously, man, if you're following this closely, ping me if some RS discusses it as a significant phrase, rather than as a news cycle event, or as an example of Trump's general problem with facts. I'm always open to evidence, and not averse to chaging an iVote when new sources are found. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

New Article: Social Brain

A reference for starting the article is The Neuroscience of Human Relationships: Attachment and the Developing Social Brain. There are other references available. I am not very well versed to create an article myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.241.53.153 (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Entitlement

Hi Penbat, thanks for your message on the NPD article talk page. I absolutely agree with you that the entitlement article needs to better represent other meanings of the word - it is too US-centric at the moment. I made a mistake when reading the entitlement article because at a glance it didn't seem relevant to entitlement in the sense of privilege/special treatment. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ) 12:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Psychopathy in the workplace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychopathy in the workplace is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Psychopathy in the workplace until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Misplaced Pages requires proper attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Operant conditioning. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dialectical behavior therapy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Positive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Authority bias

See my comments on Talk:Authority bias--WriterArtistDC (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed article rename

I've proposed to rename Mind control to Brainwashing. I'm letting you know since you contributed to the article. Redddogg (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Dominic Frisby

Finally live: Dominic Frisby. Fences&Windows 23:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Thx :-) --Penbat (talk) 08:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Refs

Any better quality references for Disengaging from an abuser using the no contact rule or grey rock method? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

There are quite a few self-help books on "no contact". "Grey rock" is such a recent concept that it gets mentioned in many websites but not many books as yet. http://www.smh.com.au/comment/how-to-deal-with-a-narcissist-like-donald-trump-20170202-gu3yzq.html mentions grey rock in some detail. Both concepts have a lot of coverage on Google and Youtube. Both concepts deserve to be on Misplaced Pages because of their notability. Anecdotally these concepts are often found to be useful by people who use them. "Disengaging from an abuser" is an important topic. It is associated with narcissistic abuse in its modern sense which is an evolving field. The fact that academic studies have not covered this area much has caused a vacuum. It would be almost impossible to do hard science in this field anyway. Popular psychology manages to plug gaps in academic research eg attention seeking, emotional baggage, emotional blackmail, guilt trip and personal boundaries.--Penbat (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Undeserving poor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Undeserving poor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  — Myk Streja  21:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Flying Monkeys

When I say "flying monkeys" followed by "abuse by proxy" I feared vandalism. I acted in haste and I apologize; I restored the text.  — Myk Streja  21:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

OK cheers :-) --Penbat (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Too difficult box for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Too difficult box is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Too difficult box until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shaded0 (talk) 16:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fit in or fuck off

The article Fit in or fuck off has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

1. WP:SLANG 2. WP:DICTDEF 3. fails WP:NEOLOGISM 4. sourcing fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 12:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for creating Workplace bullying in academia Zigzig20s (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
By the way, I added a question on the talkpage.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.--Penbat (talk) 19:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
For sure. I was going to create Academic harassment but found this article instead, so I created a redirect!Zigzig20s (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Squatting position has been nominated for discussion

Category:Squatting position, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon 04:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Fit in or fuck off

On 27 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fit in or fuck off, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the phrase "fit in or fuck off" – an organizational paradigm – has conceptually been appropriated to other contexts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fit in or fuck off. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fit in or fuck off), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Penbat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Disengaging from an abuser using the no contact rule or grey rock method for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disengaging from an abuser using the no contact rule or grey rock method is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Disengaging from an abuser using the no contact rule or grey rock method until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 01:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Re: Malasana Image

Hi Penbat,

Thank you for the message regarding the Malasana image.

I have found this one on Wikimedia commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:M%C4%81l%C4%81sana_yoga_pose.jpg

Hope this helps!

Milena.

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Stour or Avon?

Hi Penbat and a belated Happy New Year to you. I'm glad to see you're still plugging away here. I came across this photo over at Commons, File:River Stour, Christchurch - geograph.org.uk - 1761325.jpg. It looks like the Avon to me. What do you think?--Ykraps (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Off hand I dont know the answer to your question. Happy New Year to you as well and good work on historic ships. Personally I have done all the "must dos" I can think of. I probably got the most satisfaction from squatting position - we all do some element of squatting every day especially just to lower the body but oddly it has generally been airbrushed out. Most people have no idea of its versatility. I am from now on keeping a relatively low profile on Misplaced Pages - just keeping an eye on things. Misplaced Pages is enjoyable but it can also have its stresses. On the local history front I have checked out some obvious historic features of Boscombe: remnants of Victoria Hospital, neighbouring water tower, old coaching inn, derelict Boscombe railway station, the Boscombe Devil. Can you think of other prominemt historical Boscombe features that can still be seen ?--Penbat (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
I think the photograph was taken from Convent Walk, just downstream of the Town Bridge, where the fishing punt is, looking towards the far bank. I didn't say so initially because I wanted see if you thought so too without me leading you. I'll have a look when I'm next in town, to make sure.
There are a few interesting buildings in Boscombe. You might like the old technical college (896 Christchurch Rd, Pokesdown) and nearby, the old match factory in Hannington Place. Unfortunately, the old trolleybus depot, next to The Bell, appears to have been demolished but there is still the old tram, and later, trolleybus depot in Southcotte Road which is still used by the council today. Percy Florence Shelley's house in Shelley Park is still there.] It was at one time an art college but is now flats, I think. However, there is a pharmacy there (bizarrely) so you can have a peek inside. Not far from there, in College Road, is a school which used to be Lord somebody or other's (name escapes me for the moment) home. If you really want a challenge, you could try finding the site of Southbourne Pier and the houses that were built along the sea front, next to it.]] I think I know where it was but I'm just guessing. Incidentally, did you know there were plans to re-open Boscombe East station?]--Ykraps (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Help! Am I going fucking crackers? Please tell me this isn't the Avon ] and this isn't the Stour! ]--Ykraps (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Outline of self nominated for deletion

Outline of self has been nominated for deletion. Since you had some involvement with its development, you might want to participate in its deletion discussion, if you have not already done so.     — The Transhumanist    04:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Penbat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for that Airsoft edit, but I will have to revert you on the squatting article. There is no reason why this should be an a-typical article, full of useless pictures, trivia, and original research. (Seriously, this? And I can go on with listing unreliable sources.) Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I fundamentally disagree with you @Drmies:, you will have to take it to the talk page. I agree with your campaign to delete trivia from articles but you do not understand this is not one of them. In fact it is the complete opposite. Much of it covers every day actions everybody on the planet does every day, nothing like the trivia you are currently deleting. You do not understand the subject. Some of it happens to be culture specific. It is a very atypical article for which WP:IGNORE largely applies. But there are quite a few articles with more images than this. And you are missing the point singling out this which has its own article Russian squat dance and not one of mine. --Penbat (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't think there is much to understand about the subject. BTW, can you explain what the 2-liter coke bottle full of vodka is for? I certainly do not know that, and the source (haha, "source") doesn't make it very clear. Drmies (talk) 16:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
I honestly have no idea what you are on about and you obviously have no interest in understanding the subject of squatting. IMO your stance is entirely POV. I cannot think of anything more unrelated than squatting and "can you explain what the 2-liter coke bottle full of vodka is for". @Drmies:--Penbat (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
You flippantly introduced the section title "Squatting while peeing or pooping" into the article which is slang, not mentioned in the body text, and contravenes MOS:HEAD. Even worse "pooping" is US specific slang not normally used outside the US. I have corrected it. If I look hard enough I will probably find other errors. You seem to have a flippant attitude to the whole article.@Drmies:--Penbat (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Your article was ridiculous. "Pooping", a fairly common word, is less out of place than your 50k of verbosity. Actually, I was kind of wondering why there was so much interest in peeing and pooping while squatting; the article seemed a bit bottom heavy, so to speak. Drmies (talk) 00:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Wait. YOU are asking about the 2-liter bottle of vodka? YOU introduced that with your citation from Urbandictionary: "basiclly all you need is vodka in a 2 liter bottle of coke". Granted, that doesn't mean the bottle is full of vodka. Drmies (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello Penbat,

Please read Misplaced Pages:Tendentious editing until you understand it, and please avoid that type of behavior. You may also benefit from reading Misplaced Pages:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. If you continue on the path you've taken recently, things may not end well for you. Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter. Cullen Let's discuss it 07:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Open marriage has been nominated for discussion

Category:Open marriage, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

"Keyboard warrior" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keyboard warrior. Since you had some involvement with the Keyboard warrior redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Thryduulf (talk) 00:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Penbat! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II 17:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
I would like to present this barnstar as a sign of thanks for your efforts in trying to help and improve Misplaced Pages. You have been a valuable and trusted contributor over the years. Regards, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

"SquatForChange" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SquatForChange. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5#SquatForChange until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 07:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:ICD-10 personality disorders

Template:ICD-10 personality disorders has been nominated for merging with Template:Personality disorder classification. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Xurizuri (talk) 07:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

"Indifference to others' suffering" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Indifference to others' suffering. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Indifference to others' suffering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

"Lack of guilt in psychopaths" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lack of guilt in psychopaths. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Lack of guilt in psychopaths until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

"Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Lack of sense of responsibility of psychopaths until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

"Superficial sympathy" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Superficial sympathy. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Superficial sympathy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Flying monkeys (popular psychology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying monkeys (popular psychology) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Flying monkeys (popular psychology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

François Robere (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Films about psychopaths has been nominated for deletion

Category:Films about psychopaths has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Films about psychopaths has been nominated for deletion

Category:Films about psychopaths has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of My way or the highway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My way or the highway is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/My way or the highway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dronebogus (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Fit in or fuck off for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fit in or fuck off is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Fit in or fuck off until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dronebogus (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Oh Yeah? (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oh Yeah? (album) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Oh Yeah? (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VTVL (talk) 03:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Academics and writers on narcissism has been nominated for renaming

Category:Academics and writers on narcissism has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oh Yeah cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oh Yeah cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Workplace bullying has been nominated for deletion

Category:Workplace bullying has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

"Legal abuse" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Legal abuse has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12 § Legal abuse until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

"Legal abuses" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Legal abuses has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12 § Legal abuses until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

"Sorority squat" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sorority squat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Sorority squat until a consensus is reached. –Sonicwave 17:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

"Monkey squat" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Monkey squat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Monkey squat until a consensus is reached. –Sonicwave 17:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Abuse/doc

Template:Abuse/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Categories: