| Revision as of 14:33, 10 April 2015 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,248 edits →April 2015: warning: I don't know what to tell you← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:13, 8 November 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,616 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Archive 2019) (bot | ||
| (85 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| {{Usertalksuper}} | {{Usertalksuper}} | ||
| {{archive box|<center>] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] </center>}} | {{archive box|<center>] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] </center>}} | ||
| ] - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all. | ] - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:TWA/Navigation2}} | {{Misplaced Pages:TWA/Navigation2}} | ||
| == ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
| == Request for arbitration == | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| I have of the issues you are involved in on ] pages. ] (]) 18:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Query == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| : This edit deleted numerous sources, including deleting text and sources from a number reputable organisations and sources from reviews against ] and ]. | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| : This edit deleted numerous sources, including deleting text and sources from a number reputable organisations and sources from reviews against ] and ] '''again'''. | |||
| </table> | |||
| : This edit deleted numerous sources, including deleting text and sources from a number reputable organisations and sources from reviews against ] and ] '''again'''. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 --> | |||
| : This edit deleted numerous sources, including deleting text and sources from a number reputable organisations and sources from reviews against ] and ] '''again'''. | |||
| :], aren't you deleting a lot of sources against ]? Where is your comment on the talk page to support deleting so many sources according to ]? IMO no reasonable argument has been made to delete so many reliable sources including deleting reviews such as (PMID 24732159) and (PMID 24732160) and (PMID 25572196) after over '''two weeks'''. Please review the current discussion on the . What could possibly be a logical reason to '''delete''' so many sources? Please try to help editors at the talk page understand your reverts back to an older version. Please see ]. Thanks. ] (]) 17:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Each and every one of those reverts carry a text that describes why i reverted. Is any one of those texts problematic to you? --] 11:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::I think there is a clear consensus at the talk page that your edits were largely counterproductive. See ] for example. If you can acknowledge you made a mistake, especially with deleting MEDRS compliant reviews, we can move on. Or do you still think the page should be wholesale reverted back without the sources. Do you think all the sources you deleted were unreliable? I don't see your argument on the talk page to justify deleting all the sources. See ]. ] (]) 16:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::And once more i think you should read the revert reasons and reflect upon what they say - instead of conflating them with other issues. Do you understand what an RfC is, and that it has a closing time? --] 20:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merger discussion for ]== | |||
| == Declined ArbCom case == | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing—]—has been '''proposed for ]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in ]. Thank you. ] (]) 18:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| The arbitration request concerning ] articles has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. For the committee, ] (]) 03:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| See ]. It was the opinion of some of the arbitrators that the issue may still be resolved by the community. For the committee, ] (]) 14:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Congratulations== | |||
| Any election win is important, I was wondering why you have not been editing lately. You probably have been very busy. ] 23:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you :) Yep, it has been a rather hectic period, and probably is going to get even more hectic now that the Danish implementation of the TPD is on the table. --] 23:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :: Indeed. ''And'' you got a message from a ferret, what could be better? ] (]) 06:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Congratulations == | |||
| Just heard about the election. Congratulations, I hope you can get some good work done making the TPD not destroy vaping in your community. ] (]) 09:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thx. Will certainly try. --] 14:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == General Sanctions: Electronic Cigarettes == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A community discussion has authorised the use of ] for pages related to ].<br>The details of these sanctions are described ]. | |||
| ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| | icon size = 50px}} ] (]) 07:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you QG, i', well aware of the general sanctions. Especially since i !voted to have them :) --] 12:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==April 2015: warning== | |||
| Kim, is a simple provocation, and it's obvious from article talk and your edits elsewhere who it's meant to provoke. Talking about "the proposal by S. Marshall" in the edit summary doesn't abrogate your responsibility; ''you'' added the tag, following an (IMO) obviously jocular, if mean-spirited, suggestion by ] on the talkpage a week earlier. The user you're trying to bait doesn't need to see such spitefulness at the top of the article. '''Nor do our readers''', indeed I'm surprised you have so little consideration for them. Considering your COI, you need to be much more circumspect around the e-cigarette articles. I'm glad to hear you're aware of the general sanctions. I'll topic ban you from electronic cigarette-related pages if you make any further battleground-y or otherwise inappropriate edits in the area, especially to the article itself. ] | ] 12:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC). | |||
| :Actually it wasn't an attempt at provocation - it was meant as half-way meet. I was concerned that the reinstatement of the POV tag would result in QG reverting again. Perhaps i'm naïve with this, but the tag text seemed appropriate to the content problems, and might be less of a red-flag than the POV one. Warning acknowledged though :) --] 14:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm a bit confused here. What are you referring to when you say that i have "little consideration" to our readers? That seems to require a bit more explanation. --] 14:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I guess I can't help your confusion. If you really think it's OK for that trolling "tag" to be the first thing to meet our readers' eyes when they come here to read about electronic cigarettes, I don't know what to tell you. ] | ] 14:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC). | |||
Latest revision as of 04:13, 8 November 2023
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Editing Principles - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all.
LoS: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LoS
Playground: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Temporary User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Sandbox
Inhofe list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Inhofe
William list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/William
Created articles: Sami Solanki, Jan Esper
Linux Weight: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LinuxWeight
CCD: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/CCD
Fossil treelines, et al
This is really a "thank you" for challenging my thinking, and catching a dumb error, over at the HS page. What a pleasure, particularly compared to interacting with the Wikilawyer at the Other Page... Once again, welcome back, and stay sharp! Cheers -- Pete Tillman
about wind power cost per one installization.
can u mail me, how much cost of a windpower plantation of an single. how much energy output. how much duration of time to install. all total cost of an one install.
Welcome to The Misplaced Pages Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
--
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Misplaced Pages Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Merger discussion for Global warming controversy
An article that you have been involved in editing—Global warming controversy—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)