Talk:Law of South Korea: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:32, 24 July 2006 editZonath (talk \| contribs)943 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 09:13, 11 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,260,237 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Korea}}, {{WikiProject Law}}.
(15 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~korean~~}}		{{talkheader}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|vital=yes\|1=
			{{WikiProject Korea\|importance=Top}}
			{{WikiProject Law\|importance=Mid}}
			}}

			==Untitled==
	my vague understanding was that the legal system in south korea is, not surprisingly, based on the japanese system of the colonial era, which was based on the german legal system. today, it has been much modified, especially towards the anglo-american system. i'm curious if any pre-colonial, in other words, chinese, influences remain at all. these are the details i'd like to see in the history section, if anyone can find good references. ] 18:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)		my vague understanding was that the legal system in south korea is, not surprisingly, based on the japanese system of the colonial era, which was based on the german legal system. today, it has been much modified, especially towards the anglo-american system. i'm curious if any pre-colonial, in other words, chinese, influences remain at all. these are the details i'd like to see in the history section, if anyone can find good references. ] 18:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Line 15:		Line 20:
	:The history section of the Supreme Court website indicates that Korea had established a modern court system by 1894. It also says:		:The history section of the Supreme Court website indicates that Korea had established a modern court system by 1894. It also says:

	The modernization of Korea was disrupted by the invasion of Japan. Because of Japan's annexation of Korea, Koreans had to focus their efforts on achieving national independence. However, from the perspective of comparative law, it was an interesting period. This was because Korea adopted the Japanese legal system, which came from the modern European civil law countries. The adoption of the Japanese legal system created the necessary momentum for Korea's eventual assimilation of the modern European civil law system.		::The modernization of Korea was disrupted by the invasion of Japan. Because of Japan's annexation of Korea, Koreans had to focus their efforts on achieving national independence. However, from the perspective of comparative law, it was an interesting period. This was because Korea adopted the Japanese legal system, which came from the modern European civil law countries. The adoption of the Japanese legal system created the necessary momentum for Korea's eventual assimilation of the modern European civil law system.

	:So while credit is given to Japan for introducing the concepts, it also seems to indicate an evolution since then towards a continental European system. At any rate, there are a couple books on Korean law at my school's law library, which I intend to check out once I have the bare bones of this article fleshed out a bit more. I'll also be checking out the links you sent up. Thanks. --] 18:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)		:So while credit is given to Japan for introducing the concepts, it also seems to indicate an evolution since then towards a continental European system. At any rate, there are a couple books on Korean law at my school's law library, which I intend to check out once I have the bare bones of this article fleshed out a bit more. I'll also be checking out the links you sent up. Thanks. --] 18:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

			::Working on getting more of the substantive aspects of Korean law into the article. Using at the moment as a resource. Will branch out a bit once those articles are out of the way. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 03:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

			== Politicking in the prosecutors section? ==

			The section on prosecutors seems to adopt a POV in favor of the system of prosecutors and/or President Park. I'm by no means an expert in the subject, but I'd like to see either more sources or a more neutral POV. ] (]) 14:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,

			I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110325094835/http://www.pennealr.com/pages/issues/volume_4/issue_1.php to http://www.pennealr.com/pages/issues/volume_4/issue_1.php

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 14:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,

			I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060728021032/http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/ks00000_.html to http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/ks00000_.html
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050308213820/http://www.ccourt.go.kr/english/history.htm to http://www.ccourt.go.kr/english/history.htm

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 16:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:13, 11 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Law of South Korea article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This

level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

my vague understanding was that the legal system in south korea is, not surprisingly, based on the japanese system of the colonial era, which was based on the german legal system. today, it has been much modified, especially towards the anglo-american system. i'm curious if any pre-colonial, in other words, chinese, influences remain at all. these are the details i'd like to see in the history section, if anyone can find good references. Appleby 18:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

some interesting links, for other editors or myself later. Appleby 18:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Appleby 18:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The history section of the Supreme Court website indicates that Korea had established a modern court system by 1894. It also says:

The modernization of Korea was disrupted by the invasion of Japan. Because of Japan's annexation of Korea, Koreans had to focus their efforts on achieving national independence. However, from the perspective of comparative law, it was an interesting period. This was because Korea adopted the Japanese legal system, which came from the modern European civil law countries. The adoption of the Japanese legal system created the necessary momentum for Korea's eventual assimilation of the modern European civil law system.

So while credit is given to Japan for introducing the concepts, it also seems to indicate an evolution since then towards a continental European system. At any rate, there are a couple books on Korean law at my school's law library, which I intend to check out once I have the bare bones of this article fleshed out a bit more. I'll also be checking out the links you sent up. Thanks. --Zonath 18:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Working on getting more of the substantive aspects of Korean law into the article. Using Journal of Korean Law at the moment as a resource. Will branch out a bit once those articles are out of the way. --Zonath 03:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Politicking in the prosecutors section?

The section on prosecutors seems to adopt a POV in favor of the system of prosecutors and/or President Park. I'm by no means an expert in the subject, but I'd like to see either more sources or a more neutral POV. 184.171.158.222 (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law of South Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110325094835/http://www.pennealr.com/pages/issues/volume_4/issue_1.php to http://www.pennealr.com/pages/issues/volume_4/issue_1.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Law of South Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories: