Misplaced Pages

User talk:A Man In Black: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:57, 25 July 2006 editSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits Arbitration Request Filed← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:08, 14 August 2024 edit undoSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors196,777 edits Notification: listing of Zelda III at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{notaround|date=June 2009}}
<div style="background: #DDDDFF; border: 1px solid #88b; padding: 5px; margin: 0em;"> <div style="background: #DDDDFF; border: 1px solid #88b; padding: 5px; margin: 0em;">
Hello there. If you haven't noticed, I kind of left. Just no longer amusing to edit WP any more, and I no longer have the password to this account. This is still here for posterity, though.
Hello there. If you're going to leave me a comment (or yell at me, which is seeming increasingly common lately), please start a new header (or add to an old one), and sign your comments by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> to the end of them.


Archives:
If you're coming here to reply to a comment I made on your talk page, '''STOP''', go back to your talk page, and reply there. If I made a comment on your talk page and expect a reply, your talk page is on my watchlist. I'd rather not follow conversations in 79 million different places if I can at all avoid it.
*] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

Archives: ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
*] *]
*]
</div> </div>
]


]

== Editting of MGS3 article ==
Exactly why did you revert my slight change all I did was delete one non important sentence and It got reverted. After that I was not allowed to edit at all. ] 02:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
:Not sure what you're talking about. I've only reverted that article twice any time recently, and neither of those users were blocked. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 02:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

== Revert of X-Men Legends II ==

I'm not quite sure why you reverted my edits. All I did was fix the titles of the links, and also re-added the skinning site that was there in the first place, somebody removed it. I am new to this so please reply if I did something wrong. ] 08:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

Dear self:

Revert more or less back to , while doing cleanup along the way. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

== Edit warring and discussion ==
My apologies for the edit warring, there. I simply didn't condone the rollback and lack of descriptive eidt summeries in article construction. Since you strongly dispute some of my edit and related reasoning, I suggest we adhere to 1RR and bring relelvant discussion to talkpages. Inquiring for third opinions is also preferable.

Again, I apologize. I really would like us to work together on this. -] 03:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:Fair enough.
:As for image sizes, I've been trying to get to a standard width of 200px on pretty much everything; a little less for tall images and short articles, a little more for short images. If you're pushing everything to the border, you're often dwarfing the actual article, as well as bloating an already-large infobox. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

::I really think its our difference in monitors; 200px for the Gandara image looked nearly unable to be seen to me. I comprimised with 235px, as I thought it fair to keep the infobox in a reasonable size and one that allowed the image to be seen.

::Of course this is irrelevant; since its merged. On the minor characters article, the lack of information is attributed to the game's distribution solely to Japan. The official site is here: ; without a translator (my japanese is horrid) we can not derive any background data for the article. -] 03:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:::You know, I'm starting to think we might be better with bulleted lists and one-two sentences in the game articles for the SS series. Most of these articles are unexpandable stubs that will never have anything but plot summary. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

::Agreed. Let's merge ] into the list as well. I believe removing the infoboxes was a good idea; I'd expected editors to fill in information but nothing ever came of it. -] 03:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Merge away, or tag for merging, whichever you like. I'm busy converting the infobox at the moment. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

== What are you doing? ==

I am being actively harassed and you have reverted incorrectly. This person has already notified of harassment. ] 07:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

==Samurai Edge article==
Perhaps you should explain how exactly a fictional category should be emphasised, if not by describing the subject in question as fictional. It's a fictional weapon, appearing in the fictional Resident Evil video game. What else is there to add? ] 08:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:Have you seen ]? I mis-linked it in my edit summary, but it shows how to handle fictional objects from an out-of-universe style, instead of an in-universe style. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:The article isn't large enough to explain from an outside source point-of-view, everything requiring explanation has already been addressed in the main Resident Evil article. If you're suggesting the entire article be scrapped and re-written, perhaps you should explain exactly what you want addressed regarding its fiction so that the next writer won't do exactly the same thing. ] 08:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
::What do you mean that it's not large enough to explain from an out-of-universe perspective? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:You wish to add information regarding the publisher, the creator, date of release, etc. Why? Its not worth the effort, the article itself is simply a small page intended to explain what the "Samurai Edge" is to people reading the main RE article who are unfamiliar with the name or weapon. ] 08:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
::If it's not worth turning into a properly encyclopedic article, then it probably needs to be merged or deleted. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Then why didn't you suggest merging the article instead? You still haven't explained what it is you want adjusted within the article. ] 08:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:Haven't a clue where to merge it. I know a bit about RE, but not really enough to know where it would go. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:Exactly why the article exists to begin with. There is no specific article or category for it to fall under. I wrote much of the article in question and, as such, would not like to see it deleted or merged. I would simply like to know what you wish to add to the article to help explain its fiction. ] 08:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
::Well, right now it's just not encyclopedic. It tracks the movements of a single fictional object, without ever offering any context or even explaining in which games each claim can be attributed to. I'm tempted to prod it, honestly. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 09:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I suppose the problem you have with the article is that you believe most of it has been entirely made up then? Much of the information can be found in files picked up in-game, more is explained in bios and official sites regarding RE. You said you're not a big fan of RE, I assure you, I am, and I know what I'm talking about. ] 09:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:I don't think it's made up (Well, it was made up by Capcom, but you know what I mean), I think it's wholly unsourced, and subtrivial. Misplaced Pages can't rest on "I know what I'm talking about"; you need to cite sources, and "the RE series" doesn't really cut it.
:Additionally, I don't really think this article is worth going to all the trouble of rewriting and sourcing, since it's subtrivial; one gun in one game series. I think the best thing to do with it is redirect it or delete it, from what you've told me in this conversation. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 09:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps you should open a poll regarding that decision. Regardless, I can't specify every single file I've come across from a game made in 1999. If you want sources, I'm sure they have something at the official website or you can pick up a copy of Nemesis from ]. Instead of deleting the article, why don't you personally add the references you would like to see displayed?
:Are you suggesting I send it to AFD? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 09:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
What the hell is "AFD"? ] 09:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:]. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 09:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
As I've already stated, I don't want the article deleted so obviously that is not what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting that if you don't like how the article is written, you should make the changes you feel it needs. ] 09:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:And I'm stating that I'm not qualified to do so without some idea what games are involved, and the article doesn't currently give me context sufficient to determine same. Additionally, I don't think the article will be encyclopedic after being sourced. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 09:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:Then I suppose we won't be reaching an agreement on this issue anytime soon. I believe that it details a major weapon used by many characters in several RE games, and that there isn't another description of such depth on the Internet today. People who read the article will most certainly already be familiar with the Resident Evil franchise and will hardly be interested in the sourcing of information and out-of-universe perspective or relevancy. You obviously don't agree. I suppose you'll do what you'll do. ] 10:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

What should I do about this user removing my comments from her page? I've already tried to "let it go" during many conversations, but now I'm completely sick of her attitude. Removing my comments is insanely irritating and I'm not going to stand for it. Let me know your opinions on the matter. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 08:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:], I guess. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

== Hello! ==
]
Hi A Man In Black! Long time, few encounters. How are you? Still the bright, bubbly person we once knew and loved :P?

Anyway, having looked at your recent talkpage entries (yes, your userpage is still on my watchlist), I can see perilously few positive messages, compliments or other such niceties (I've never been able to spell that word) so here you go: a message with no griping, moaning, groaning, vicious or catty comments, or even useful, insightful discussion. Instead, you got me, on - is that an improvement? I doubt it, but you have me anyway. Oh, and this delicious-looking fruit 'n' veg stall (sorry, I'm a ] to the core). Enjoy!

Thanks and kind regards, &mdash;]<font color="green">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 23:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
:Hee, I appreciate it. Lately I've been running into the same problems I used to have with Pokémon cleanup in other fandoms. Fun fun fun, you know? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== Cowasaur! ==

Lol! XD ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 14:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

== Arcade and CVG merger ==
When you have time, could you stop by ]? We're discussing a possible merger of the Arcade and CVG boxes and your expertise in terms of templates could be useful. I suppose the outcome would result in a much more streamlined solution than what we have currently. <span style="font-family:lucida grande, lucida sans unicode;">]/]/]</span> 16:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

== Metal Gear Ac!d ==

Why did you move both Metal Gear Ac!d pages? The official names are spelled with "!" rather than "i", later tonight I will move them unless you can give a valid reason not to. ] 01:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:Official names don't really matter. Common usage vastly favors the plainer spelling. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== Big Shell, Shadow Moses and Zanzibar Land ==

You seem, at the moment, to be actively wanting these articles...deleted. For a while now though I have been contemplating creating a '''Metal Gear Locations''' (Or some other better name) article. This way you can incorporate the ''specific'' aspects of each place to without each article being a stub. Would you object to that? (] 05:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC))
:Really, I don't think that's a good idea. You can just mention the setting briefly in the game articles. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== Pokémon #360 ==

Thank you. (Lol) ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 10:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:I figured you'd get the message. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 10:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

:''Word to your mother.'' Indeed. ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 10:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
::I keep changing that whenever I get bored. Useless fact: ] is a redirect to ]. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 10:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:::You really are on the verge of a mental breakdown aren't you. I can understand the rage. ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 18:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
::::Hahaha. I was just listing to Ninja Rap right now. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 18:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>Nods* Yes, yes you were. ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup>]</sup> 18:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== Norton ==

Sorry, I should have specified that I was referring to the other fellow's reasoning as to Norton's not being a "real" emperor--I realize that you aren't making that argument. And perhaps I should have refrained from speculating as to other's motives altogether. ] 15:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:Eh, I'm sorry for how I reacted, too; looking at it now, it was needlessly harsh. Sorry about that. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== Dick Distribution ==

I couldn't help asking, but is there some sort of joke tradition going on with putting the dead guy on your talk page onto other people's pages and labeling it as vandalism? If it weren't a joke, it's kind of a strange thing for an admin to do. And let me assure you: If you put one of those Nixon-faced goblins on my talk page, I'll replace it with a of my own... This is ] 19:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:It's definitely a joke; a very weird vandal once put one on my talk page, so I kept it because I was amused. It sort of became a thing after I decided to poll #wikipedia for people who wanted to have their user pages vandalized with a picture of a Dick, and it went from there. Minun put a request on his user page to have it redesigned, so I added a decoration. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 19:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
::I think I can actually challenge your credibility with that explanation: Research into your talk page's history reveals that it was not the vandal that put the Nixon picture there, it was you that put it there to replace what the vandal had put in previously: an actual picture of an erect male tool. And the reason he did that was because you deleted a page called "Pope John Paul Kiddiefiddler", which he was apparently attached to. Ahh, details are entertaining... Right now I ''don't'' want one for myself, by the way. ] 20:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
:::I did? Huh, well, there you go. I remembered the vandal putting it there. Oh well. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 20:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

==Those who deny Polk are uneducated==
] 21:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

:Don't push a ]. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 21:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

== Re:] ==

Oh please, I can only read kana and the most basic and common of kanji. xD; But I did it.—] 03:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
:Yeeeah. I'm not sure what kana and kanji are, so I'm gonna just pretend I understand that and thank you for the help. Thank you muchly for the help! - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 04:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

== ] ==

I must say this looks like afd material to me. -]

== Nintendogs ==

Sorry for the ] article, I might have overlooked that section. Regards --] 05:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

== Reappropriating a redirect? ==

In the instance of ], aren't you actually appropriating it? As far as I can see, King of Hearts had it directing to the pokemon test first. ] <small>]</small> 11:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
:Er. I never meant to imply that the project had it first, just that it should be pointed to an active Wikiproject instead of an essay. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 12:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
:Er. That's not what I understood you to say. Because you used the term reappropriation, I assumed you were saying it had been and still should be redirecting to the WikiProject. I was just confused by your language. It just seemed a silly point to me otherwise, because if the Project had wanted the shortcut it had lain there until April waiting. Still, there's probably little worth discussing it any further. ] <small>]</small> 13:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

== Vandalism ==
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to ], are considered ]. If you continue in this manner you may be '''blocked from editing without further warning'''. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. ]<sub>]</sub>|<sup>]</sup></small> 11:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
:I asked for people who wanted their userpage vandalized on IRC, and you said yes. It was just a picture of Richard Nixon. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 12:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

== A huge plane ==
:Is there anything I can do to help right now? &mdash;]] <sup>]</sup> 18:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
::Just notifying you that my current task is cleaning up what you left on ], cheers &mdash;]] <sup>]</sup> 19:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Well, not using fair-use images outside of userspace would be a good start. :/ - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::::It said on the descripiton page it was in the public domain, I might be wrong but I was just honouring what it said on the description page &mdash;]] <sup>]</sup> 12:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::It is? Oh, well then! - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

== Look im on teh internets and IRC get on it ==

] --]] 21:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


<!--PUT YOUR COMMENT AT THE BOTTOM. I WILL SIMPLY DELETE NEW HEADERS ADDED TO THE TOP OF THE PAGE. -->
==Redirect change on ], ]==


== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
If you're going to change an established redirect created by someone else without gathering consensus or even notifying anyone, you could at least change all the old links that went there first. Come on, you can't just hijack a redirect. ] ] <font color="#00AA88">(])</font> 04:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 05:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
==Image tagging for Image:Jirachi2.png==
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.


== ] and ] ==
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
*]
*]


Hi,
This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 08:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


I've mentioned the above wikiproject and template as well as a whole category of templates at:
:Fixed. ]<font color="#009933">]</font>] <sup><font color="#CF5440">]</font></sup> 10:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
* ]
which is a sort of workshop for an RfC (or multiple RfCs) concerning the whole issue of colour use, and wikiproject authority. I see you've been heavily involved in this and am letting you know; a few other interested parties, too. Cheers, ] 22:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


p.s. I hope you're well; come on back, huh?
== ______ITS DONE_____ ==
==Orphaned non-free image File:MG2SSCodec.gif==


<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
'''Operation PokéFix has been completed for every article on Misplaced Pages'''. ] --]] 10:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
:Thank you muchly! - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::Where's my beer >:| --]] 03:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Catch me on IRC. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


'''PLEASE NOTE:'''
==VersaLife==


* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
Why did you remove the info box. I put it up on the article because I thought it was helpful. Shanequinlan01
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
:Because corporation infoboxes should only be used for real corporations. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 03:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


==Next mission: Star Wars==
I know you've been following my star wars cruft battle over the last few months. Well, I'm ready to step it up. Hopefully, I'll be able to leave the orgnaization/quarentine stage and enter the "real life perspective" metamorphasis phase within the next few weeks ;) &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:I've been tagging everything I can find with {{tl|in-universe}}, but please-oh-please can ] be one of the first targets? It's so fixable but so cruft-heavy, and I've been coming off as a lone nut trying to fight the cruft. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::Well, I was starting with the most nastiest examples, but I'll work on Darth Vader after these Final Fantasy FAs conclude. By the way, what do you think? &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::...think about what? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::::...the Final Fantasy FACs :-P &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::I wasn't aware of them, and I'm not really very good at telling a FA from anything else. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::::::Ah, it's quite okay. By the way, you think Darth Vader is bad? ] is an absolute nightmare. &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::::The hugeness makes me cry. I'm tempted to cut it down to a one-para stub. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::::::::I put it on my queue, but I doubt I'll ever get to it. That article should be no more than 30 KB. Heck, even ], which still has melodramatic issues, is ten times better. &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::::::Yeah, always more work to be done than energy or time to do it. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::::::::::If you had to choose: deleting a six day backlog of orphaned fairuse images or cleaning up Cloud's article? &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::::::::No question, editing tasks over admin tasks. The images'll get deleted by someone else, eventually. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I can't say whether I agree or disagree, because it may come back to haunt me in RfB. ;) &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:Fuck RfB in the ear. I wouldn't wish bureaucratship on my worst enemy. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 05:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::I have an interesting acronym for RfB that relates to your comment, but again, it might come back to haunt me in RfB :) &mdash; ''']]]''' 05:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::I think my response to being nominated for RfB would be to solumnly vow to admin Willy on Wheels and SPUI. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
* RfA - Requests for adminship
* RfB - Requests for B-cratship
* RfC - Requests for comment
* RfD - Requests for deletion
* RfS - Requests for suicide
&mdash; ''']]]''' 06:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:I am going to bed. Make sure the Wiki doesn't explode. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 06:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::G'night. &mdash; ''']]]''' 06:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
== Image:Roll (Battle Network).jpg ==


==Consensus discussion on photo==
Why does it say "''Primary source needed''"? It's got the copyright tag and I mentioned where it was from (and in the past that's all that was necessary), what's missing? --] 07:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I've started a consensus discussion , and would appreciate your input. Thanks. ] (]) 03:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
:Atomic Fire scanned it or got it from somewhere; if it was a press kit image, you need to say that, and if it was scanned, you need to say where. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::But how am I to know all that? --] 23:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:::If you don't know that about an image, you really shouldn't upload it to Misplaced Pages. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 23:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
::::First off, that didn't really answer my question. Second, I've posted images on Misplaced Pages before and never had to say where it was from, why am I asked to all of a sudden? And third, other people do the exact same thing I did, why aren't they getting picked on? --] 04:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


== Vandalism on the FHFIF characters page. == ==Discussion on Project page==
Hi. Can you give your thoughts in ] I've started? Thanks. Happy Holidays. ] (]) 18:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
There was some vandalism (though reverted, but the attacks were definitely repeated) on ] by anonymous editor(s) (whose IPs are shown) during the previous two days (assuming it's Sunday now). I believe the attacks are linked, given details of the editors' "contributions" since none of them are exactly anything to write home about. I reported this to ] but it turns out he's on Wikibreak. --] (] * ]) 08:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> —''']'''&nbsp;(]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]) 13:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
== Arcade box conversion ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px">]</span>, and <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:0 1px 1px 0">]</span> 04:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Saw your note on WP:CVG talk, how do you go about to quickly convert these things? <span style="background-color:#000;border:1px solid black;font-family:verdana;color:red;">//]]]</span> 10:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
:] --]] 10:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Fictional Companies and infoboxes ==


Hey, if you're watching, Dream Focus forgot to notify you of his little kick at ya. Best, ] (]) (Jack) 14:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Nearly all fictional companies have their own info boxes. Live and let live. Also I wouldnt go and do a serious edit on a resident evil article. They wouldnt like it.
:I don't care any more. I'm done rolling this rock up the mountain, and happier for it. ] <small>(] - ])</small> 22:35, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
:The central company in the resident evil story is big/important enough to have its own infobox. --]] 08:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
::Importance doesn't enter into it. That infobox describes Umbrella as though it were a real company (and yes, I saw the little "fictional" at the top), which is ]. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 18:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


== File:Cowasaur.png listed for deletion ==
== Vandalism ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 14:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
What you are doing on the New Super Mario Brothers Wiki page is vandalism, adding more reviews to the review section should not be reverted back. It is providing more opinions for the viewer on this particular game. It should be noted that the particular review I am adding is for NON profit and is from a down to earth gamer's perspective rather than a paid critic working for a corporation. Also Gamerankings is a site that has hundreds of scores submitted from various sites and is a great place to have many opinions offered to you at one single location. Please think about what you are doing before you do it. Thankyou --] 15:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
== Template:Cleanup-fiction-as-fact listed at ] ==
:TotalGamerZone is not a ], and, frankly, neither is the largely-fan-submitted Gamerankings. This reviews section is not long for this world, as a handful of the reviews will be used in an actually-encyclopedic "Critical reception" section and the rest discarded.
]
:On the other hand, ] is vandalism and can be reverted on sight. Please desist. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 22:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Template:Cleanup-fiction-as-fact'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 13:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 03:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


== A barnstar for you! ==
Gamerankigs is part of the CNet umbrella which owns Gamespot. Yes there are fansites submitted but they must pass strict guidelines before they can be submitted. The site must have over 300 reviews for a multiplatform site and over 150 for a site dedicated to one particular console. It is a great way for the user to see many opinions all in one place. If anything Famitsu scores should be removed considering we do not have access to the actual review and it is in a foreign language. --]
:I'm quite aware of how "strict" the guidelines are, having gotten my own lame fansite past them. Famitsu is a major, well-known publication. TGZ isn't, and Gamerankings isn't even a publication. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 22:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
You do realize the guidelines have changed for Gamerankings though right? And if you compare a Gamerankings score to any of the major "publications" you will realize that it falls in line with the average, because Gamerankings is the average. --]
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
:Yup. And those guidelines aren't anything like Misplaced Pages's standards for ]. I don't see any reason to link to Gamerankings (and the ] has decided not to include Gamerankings links, again and again). - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 22:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ] (]) 01:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
|}


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
All I can say is if you feel that removing gamers opinions will make Misplaced Pages a better place, more power to you. Should Misplaced Pages not be a place for everyone? Should it not be a place where even the lesser views are still identified? --]
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
:Removing advertisements makes Misplaced Pages a better place. ]. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 23:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
All in the eye of the beholder I suppose. --]


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice -->
==Regarding ownership of talk pages==
== Deathklok listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Deathklok'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ''']''' (]) 07:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 16:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 23:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Thanks for not respecting my wishes, I have come to expect no less from you. I am fully aware of the discussion regarding warnings. Frankly, it is irrelevant to what I have stated on my talk page. Surely I am within my rights to state that I do not wish to use the User talk page to communicate, but inted to comply with clearly enunciated policy and ARBCOM rulings. It is clearly stated that ] is '''not''' a policy.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 10:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
I also feel that your "helpful" posting to my talk page is a back-handed way in which to harass me, as you surely know that you are one of the administrators that I obviously do not wish to communicate with at all. Can I say that I do not like you without that being uncivil or being characterized as a personal attack? Is it ok just to think it, but not write it? No incivility is intended in this remark, but I would rather not communicate with you at all unless absolutely necessary because I do not like you. Is telling someone that you don't like them "uncivil"? or a "personal attack"? If stating so is somehow "uncivil" or a "personal attack", I hereby apologize in advance (do I have to MEAN the apology for it to count?)and ask how I could explain that I do not wish to communicate with you in any way, shape or form without being uncivil or making a personal attack in communicating to you that I wish no further communication with you.--] 23:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of ] ==
:I left a note because I thought you might want to know.
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 17:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


== ] ==
:As for the rest, a fact of life is dealing with people you don't like. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 23:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
::In that case, thanks for leaving the note. I would request that you please refrain from "leaving me notes about things you think I might want to know" as I do not wish to receive such "notes" from you in the future. As for the rest, how I am dealing with this fact of life, is by calmly and as civily as possible, asking you to refrain from communicating with me unless entirely necessary. Is it so hard for you respect my wishes not to communicate with you further?--] 23:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 -->
== Dragon Quest I & II listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Dragon Quest I & II'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


== Bringing back the relatives field in comic book character info boxes ==
:::Noted (if you can pardon the pun). I was under the impression you were asserting the right to remove comments left on your talk page and reply to them elsewhere (as another user has done), rather than expressing your desire not to use your user talk page at all. (Frankly, I mostly skim user talk page headers.) I won't leave any more notes unless it's admin business or something where your input is strictly needed.


What's your opinion on this topic? Want to weight in on it ]? ] (]) 14:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
:::In the handful of places I had seen your comments, I had noted your more-measured, more-civil tone and it is appreciated. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 23:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
: {{ping|Fluffyroll11}} You realize you are asking someone who has been inactive for seven years. ]] 20:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
::::Much appreciated that you will respect my wishes not to communicate with you unless necessary.--] 23:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::Out of curiousity, how do you suggest that people get in contact with you when they need to speak with you specifically? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 23:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
::::::Did you even bother to read what I have written on my User talk page? I asked that editors please refrain from communicating with me there unless absolutely necessary. I suppose it depends on what your definition of "need to speak" is. I am trying to express that I am not interested in communications (even such as this one) unless they are absolutely relevant and pertinent. If someone wants to talk to me in a manner other than this, I am putting up the notice on my User Talk page to make it clear that I do not wish to communicate unless it is necessary. Editors should be able to communicate with me on talk pages of relevant articles or on appropriate project pages for any other requirements. The only reason I am entertaining even this conversation as long as I have on your user talk page is because I wish to "settle the hash" with you, as it were. I want to get any "necessary" communication with you over with now because I don't really relish the thought of communicating with you in the future. I feel it is best for my future participation on WP to avoid you and people like you at almost all costs. Whether it is your intention or not, I interpret your communications with me as goading, insincere, harassing, offensive, frustrating, snide and back-handed. This may be a failing on my part, that I interpret your comments in the worst light even while trying to assume good faith, so to deal with that, I am choosing not to communicate with you, and request that you refrain from communicating with me.--] 00:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::::I admitted that I didn't read it very closely.


:: {{ping|Pppery}} why not? and still didn't get your opinion. Anyways it over anyways. ] (]) 03:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
:::::::How would someone notify you that a category/template/image you created is up for deletion? How would they notify you of an RFA/RFC/RFAr? How would they bring to your attentions problems with your conduct? These are vital roles of user talk pages. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 00:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
::: Two months later ... ]] 03:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The file ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== ] ==
<blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
It appears that Missingno.png was deleted because it was an unused fair use image. Missingno.jpg is used and in fair use. ] 07:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:That image still has no source info, other than a reference to a deleted image which in turn references ANOTHER image I can't find anywhere. We don't know who took this image, so it's unsourced. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
::Hmm, the big Missingno. website isn't helping either. If I uploaded a sprite of the original Missingno as a png, and then source it to that site (which I more than likely editted my file from), would that be fair use, and sourced? ] 07:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::It'd probably be best to just get a ROM and an emulator and take your own screenshot. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
::::Or it's time to get my camera and dig out the blue version. ] 07:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::You could probably ask at ]. Pictures of GB screens rarely turn out well. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
::::::I have learned that a little too late. ] 07:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
::::::Is there any way that I can source a sprite in my files? ] 07:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::::::Unless you know what game it's from and who took the screenshot and who cropped it, no. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== Arbitration Request Filed ==


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I have asked for abrbitration involving ]. See . Please post any comments you desire to add. ] 08:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 14:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 15:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 09:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 23:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
== "List of Pokémon movies and special episodes" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of Pokémon movies and special episodes'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
== "List of Pokémon by Johto Pokédex" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of Pokémon by Johto Pokédex'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 00:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
== "Pokégods" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Pokégods'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 02:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
== "Misplaced Pages:ADHOM" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14#Zelda III}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:08, 14 August 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. A Man In Black has not edited Misplaced Pages since June 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello there. If you haven't noticed, I kind of left. Just no longer amusing to edit WP any more, and I no longer have the password to this account. This is still here for posterity, though.

Archives:

A Dick on my talk page


Nomination for deletion of Template:Resident Evil films

Template:Resident Evil films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 05:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Comics and Template:Infobox graphic novel

Hi,

I've mentioned the above wikiproject and template as well as a whole category of templates at:

which is a sort of workshop for an RfC (or multiple RfCs) concerning the whole issue of colour use, and wikiproject authority. I see you've been heavily involved in this and am letting you know; a few other interested parties, too. Cheers, Jack Merridew 22:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

p.s. I hope you're well; come on back, huh?

Orphaned non-free image File:MG2SSCodec.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MG2SSCodec.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Consensus discussion on photo

Hi. I've started a consensus discussion here, and would appreciate your input. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Discussion on Project page

Hi. Can you give your thoughts in this discussion I've started? Thanks. Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 18:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pokémon character

Template:Pokémon character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 13:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:KSimagefrombeach

Template:KSimagefrombeach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over

Hey, if you're watching, Dream Focus forgot to notify you of his little kick at ya. Best, 125.162.150.88 (talk) (Jack) 14:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't care any more. I'm done rolling this rock up the mountain, and happier for it. A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 22:35, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cowasaur.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cowasaur.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:Cleanup-fiction-as-fact listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Cleanup-fiction-as-fact. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Cleanup-fiction-as-fact redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Mega Man character

Template:Infobox Mega Man character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Karime roka (talk) 01:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Resident Evil (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resident Evil (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Resident Evil (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Deathklok listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deathklok. Since you had some involvement with the Deathklok redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JJ98 (Talk) 07:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Metal Gear character

Template:Infobox Metal Gear character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox video game character

Template:Infobox video game character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Pokémon characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Pokémon characters is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shuasa (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Fighting game character

Template:Fighting game character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox video game character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Dragon Quest I & II listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dragon Quest I & II. Since you had some involvement with the Dragon Quest I & II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Bringing back the relatives field in comic book character info boxes

What's your opinion on this topic? Want to weight in on it here? Fluffyroll11 (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@Fluffyroll11: You realize you are asking someone who has been inactive for seven years. Pppery 20:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
@Pppery: why not? and still didn't get your opinion. Anyways it over anyways. Fluffyroll11 (talk) 03:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Two months later ... Pppery 03:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ghastlyvest.jpg

The file File:Ghastlyvest.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox video game character

Template:Infobox video game character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Metal Gear character

Template:Infobox Metal Gear character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Final Fantasy character

Template:Infobox Final Fantasy character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Fighting game character

Template:Fighting game character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 23:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

"List of Pokémon movies and special episodes" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Pokémon movies and special episodes. Since you had some involvement with the List of Pokémon movies and special episodes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

"List of Pokémon by Johto Pokédex" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Pokémon by Johto Pokédex. Since you had some involvement with the List of Pokémon by Johto Pokédex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

"Pokégods" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokégods. Since you had some involvement with the Pokégods redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

"Misplaced Pages:ADHOM" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Misplaced Pages:ADHOM. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#Misplaced Pages:ADHOM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

"Zelda III" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zelda III has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Zelda III until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Categories: