| Revision as of 02:06, 26 July 2006 editBongo1234 (talk | contribs)11 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:52, 11 March 2009 edit undoJLaTondre (talk | contribs)Administrators45,016 edits RFD closed as "keep" | ||
| (407 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ]; | |||
| ===] (]) on (NEW)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' A link to an website critical of this company has been repeatedly removed, probably by members of the company itself. In the interests of the public, I think this link should not be removed. ''(])'' -- ] 02:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] ] (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' I was blocked for a month in what, as far as I can tell, was violation of wiki blocking policy. I would like to pursue arbitration against the blocking admin. ] 00:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC) ''(])'' | |||
| ===] (]) on many British royalty articles (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' I have recently been contributing a ''lot'' to the British royalty articles, and all of my edits have been reverted - primary discussion has not gone well (ref: ]; ]) ''(])'' -- <span style="font-weight: bold;">]]]</span> 21:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' user insists on having his way, violations of 3RR (he was already locked out for a 3RR violation once, and has since done it again), refuses to talk, refused offer of mediation, using mulitple IP addresses (one at home and one from work, it seems). This is, admittedly, nowhere near as severe as other cases here listed, but seems to need mediation and/or arbitration nonetheless ''(])'' -- ] 19:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' A malicious and extremely uncivil vandal, that's continually editing anonymously under a changing IP address (usually starting with 84.44.*.*), has been purposefully removing factually sound information from the listed Wiki-article. I've tried amicably engaging said user/IP address numerous times regarding the dispute, but to no avail -- the only responses I get are insults and excuses as to why they won't logically engage me on the issue at hand. This back-and-forth has gotten nowhere, instead becoming worse -- the user's only grown increasingly hostile (to the point of actual threats against me). Moreover, in an apparent attempt to 'get me back,' he also went and '''blatantly''' vandalized two articles I'd had previous involvement with: ] & ]. I ask you, please, for immediate involvement before this escalates any further. ''(])'' -- ] 14:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' This user called ] has been vandalizing all pages related to ] and ] with useless, redundant and untrue information like putting even fanfics as facts like this page here ]. He also messing up some others as well. At this rate the pages will be filled with spam.... please stop him.. ''(])'' -- ] 08:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' This page and others before it have been deleted. An individual and a group have been stalking my work in what appears as organized and directed vandalism attempting to get my goat. In reading some comments I caught that each left on others talk pages with comments like "he's back" and "we need to do this the hard way" suggests inaproprote motives. In a prior occasion my IP address was broad cast widely initiating personal attacks. This page in question was deleted without warning. Generally I can see games being played by one or more specific individuals ''(])'' -- ] 13:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (pending)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' I request assistance on Hwacha article (a historical weapon), because i believe some users are deleting substantial information that was written on the article in aims of "having their personal and own professionalism". Specifically ] states that Hwacha article version as of 25 June 2006 was too confusing because got Repetitive contents, i tried to get an agreement with him or her, but he or she didn't liked that, and started to delete information and revert and started to use offensive words like ''"don't write here.."'' ''"...I am frustrated'', ''" GAME MANIACS GO AWAY"'' and so on. I think this is not civil and i wish someone can help me on this.''(])'' -- ] 05:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| === ] (]) (open)=== | |||
| ''''Brief:'''' ] has been vandalizing my talk page by putting up false "vandalsim" notices. He is angry that I started a new Wiki article ] and is taking it out on me by vandalizing my talk page and harassing me. He was banned from the ] article and "soft-banned from the ] article. He is not taking his fight to my talk page, the ] page. Please make him stop. ] 23:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like it is being handled by ]. <small>]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">(]/])</font></B></sub> 23:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (open)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' A user keeps on reverting my page even after I posted my side on the discussion page. I tried reasoning with him, I requested a RfC, a solution was given and he still chose to ignore the solution. I ask for help that my information may stay on the article. | |||
| ''(])'' -- ] 22:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Accepted by ]<sup>(])</sup> 05:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (]) on ] (open)=== | |||
| '''Brief:''' ] continues to POV push a notion that Jehovah's Witnesses actually tried to curry favor with the Nazi government with their Declaration of Facts in 1933. Other editors besides myself seem to be unable to convince him to seriously address the style, tone, POV, or appropriateness of his proposal; what is more, it is contended that the edit itself will not survive a broader base of scrutiny. ''(])'' -- ] 18:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Accepted by ]. <small>]</small> <tt><b><font color="#0033CC">]</font></b></tt> <sub><B><font color="#000000">(]/])</font></B></sub> 02:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:52, 11 March 2009
Redirect to: