| Revision as of 00:31, 27 April 2015 editEric Corbett (talk | contribs)45,616 edits →Civility: why research, why not just mouth off?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:12, 17 December 2024 edit undoEaldgyth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators152,813 edits Happy Holidays! | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{{{#ifeq:|tmbox|tmbox|mbox}} | |||
| {{bots|optout=ifd, nolicense}} | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = ''']'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}} has not edited Misplaced Pages '''{{#if:31 August 2022|since 31 August 2022|for a considerable amount of time}}'''. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach his aunt, ], who is still an occasional editor. | |||
| }}{{#if:||]]}} | |||
| == File:Bramham Park.gif listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 23:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Always precious == | |||
| Old messages are at: | |||
| ] | |||
| *] (From Oct 2004) | |||
| Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 13:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2005) | |||
| *] (From July 2005) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2006) | |||
| *] (From July 2006) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2007) | |||
| *] (From July 2007) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2008) | |||
| *] (From July 2008) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2009) | |||
| *] (From July 2009) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2010) | |||
| *] (From July 2010) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2011) | |||
| *] (From July 2011) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2012) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2013) | |||
| *] (From July 2013) | |||
| *] (From Jan 2014) | |||
| *] (From July 2014) | |||
| *] (From January 2015) | |||
| == Belton House == | |||
| This article is under FAR. You can place comments here; ] ] (]) 22:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| === Featured Article Save Award for ] === | |||
| {{User Wikipedian For|year=2004|month=11|day=8}} | |||
| There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Mail call== | |||
| ] | |||
| You have mail (finally). ] | ] 09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC). | |||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This talk page has remained protected since May 2011, when you were involved in the discussion. Since that month there has been only one edit. Is there a reason that it should remain protected? ] (]) 22:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I think you may be confusing Giano with another editor, and in any case, Giano has not edited since last August. I have unprotected that talk page. ] (]) 22:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == FAR for Matthew Brettingham == | |||
| =='''Please leave your message below:'''== | |||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 20:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Colonnette as an architectural term == | |||
| ==Season's Greetings== | |||
| I've been trying to do some improvement of ] and come across the phrase "a deep entrance arch of six orders with Purbeck marble colonnettes and enriched mouldings to the arch". I have no idea what colonnette means, a quick search just seems to find "small column" (or possibly a type of tap), and I was wondering if you could help?— ] <sup>]</sup> 14:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" | |||
| ::@ ]: You'd know them if you saw them: they are used to convey lightness and elegance. Suposedly a feature of Gothic architecture, they are more often found in Byzantine. They are they indeed small, thin columns; on their own they are purely decorative and non load bearing, but sometime you see them in groups of four or more, and then they can be load bearing, sort of safety in numbers. you've got some being decorative, but beyond a bit of buttressing, not really doing much structurally even though they are pretending to support the blind arcade. demonstrates how useful they are standing alone as structural supports! they are en masse, taking a wight, but if you look carefully at the design, they are not really bearing a serious weight, but there is safety in numbers. they are closer together and taking more of a strain. Sometimes you will see them as a three of four (I can't find a picture) beneath one capital, then they are load bearing, but appear as one faceted column. They can also be the little stone columns that you see in large tracery windows. Hope this makes sense. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 17:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :* some colonettes being really useful and taking a weight, but it does beg the question of when does a cluster of colonettes become a column. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 18:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| ::{{ec}}:::Brilliant yes that makes a lot of sense (more than the sources I'd been looking at). I'm having trouble finding a good photo of the arch doorway (its generally in a lot of shade) but , or might help. Do you think they are decorative or structural (or a bit of both). Your comment about Byzantine got me thinking..... This end of the cathedral was designed by ] and completed in 1888 so Gothic revival, but could it have been influenced by ]?— ] <sup>]</sup> 18:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::They don't look like they are doing much structurally; I suspect they are pretending to support the ornamental tracery decorating the vault above them above them, but I doubt the vault itself would fall down completely if they were taken away anymore than it would if you chipped the tracery away - that isn't how vaults are built. Of course, I can't say for sure without really seeing them. To answer your second question: No, I don't think there's much influence of Bristol Byzantine in Bristol Cathedral; through Romanesque, there's Byzantine influence in most Gothic architecture, but not especially so there. Bristol Byzantine indeed - who thought that one up? Sounds like the Bristol Tourist Board may have had a hand in that. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 08:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| :::::Thanks - I've just added "decorative" to the Colonnettes. If you fancied taking a look at the rest of the article to ensure I haven't many any silly architectural errors that would be great.— ] <sup>]</sup> 17:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the ] by ] is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. ] (]) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == It is the people I miss (not the project) == | |||
| Hello {{u|Giano}}, | |||
| Good day. ] (]) 10:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :*How very nice to here from you ]; are you rejoining our happy band? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 13:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am not. I would too quickly become frustrated by the politics of the place, and I would not wish to use the project as a social site. Until yesterday I had not logged in for over a year, but I do miss many of the people - including you - that I knew. ] (]) 10:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::I love you too ]. The politics remain the same, and the writing and stuff goes on, but a little honing of one's social skills does no harm. I've only been blocked once in ages now, and that was by some American kid with issues, so didn't really stick. You should give it a try again. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 18:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current ]. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it. | |||
| ==Linkspam== | |||
| Wow, look at your guy's contributions. Nice. I've warned them. Feel free to help remove those links, if you've got time for a little wikignoming. ] | ] 22:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC). | |||
| :Thank you ]; they all look to be reverted now. I looked at the Breathless Beauty thing, I expect David Cholmonedely and Tom Coke are thrilled to see the houses they spend millions preserving described as "Beauty in Decline." <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 16:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 04:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Isabaeau== | |||
| Thank you for stopping by and for your kind words. It meant a lot, coming from you. Btw - you were right that something was off about this quote, . Either I transposed it incorrectly or it got changed since the article was written, but it's fixed now. ] (]) 18:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's a great page ], and I was pleased to see it so beautifully written. Issie and I go back a long way, so it was very pleasing to see her name in lights. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 22:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motion regarding Durova == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| I rescued this from death by CSD this afternoon. I've already pinged ] about this, but this woman and her hotel played host to the Prince and Princess of Wales, amongst others, and she seems from all accounts to be a complete and total nutbag, so I think it's quite possible she or it are documented in your book collection somewhere. Any thoughts on how to proceed? ] ] ] 17:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{ivmbox|Principle 2 of ], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}} | |||
| ::Sorry, ], I think she may be beyond my help. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 19:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, | |||
| ] ] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Durova}}''' | |||
| *An intelligent person would leave that disgraceful episode in Misplaced Pages’s ancient history firmly buried in the past. The posting of that far from private email wasn’t the disgrace. The disgrace was why it was necessary to post it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == |
== FAR notice == | ||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Would you be kind enough to take a look at the architecture of the ]. It is described , and but it is complex (different parts of the building from different centuries and multiple revisions) and I don't think our article does it justice (and I'm a bit confused about which bits are significant enough to be included/described).— ] <sup>]</sup> 10:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Capone'scastle.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Io Saturnalia!== | ||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
| Hi Giano. I am looking into our uses of the {{tl|bots}} and {{tl|nobots}} templates with an eye towards improving our documentation. Your user talk page was one of several that uses both templates in a meaningful way. At the top of your user page, you have '''<nowiki>{{bo</nowiki><nowiki>ts|optout=ifd, nolicense}}</nowiki>''' and then later you have the {{tl|nobots}} template. Is your intention to block all bots, but then because some bots might ignore nobots, you are attempting to catch those by also using the bots template with specific parameters? Or is there another behavior that you intend? Thanks. --] (]) 20:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| ==Civility== | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
| Please don't make ] as you did when you told another editor to "pack up your ovaries and go away". ] ] ] 23:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :You may want to do a little research into history Gobonobo, although doing so prior to starting this thread would have been better. Even without the research before posting - I'd hardly call that a personal attack. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 23:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ::There's clearly a theme at work here, but I dare not mention its name. ] ] 00:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 17 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Giano has not edited Misplaced Pages since 31 August 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach his aunt, The Lady Catherine de Burgh, who is still an occasional editor. |
File:Bramham Park.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bramham Park.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Belton House
This article is under FAR. You can place comments here; Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1 Desertarun (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Belton House
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Mail call
You have mail (finally). Bishonen | tålk 09:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC).
Talk:Duke of San Donato
This talk page has remained protected since May 2011, when you were involved in the discussion. Since that month there has been only one edit. Is there a reason that it should remain protected? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 22:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think you may be confusing Giano with another editor, and in any case, Giano has not edited since last August. I have unprotected that talk page. Cullen328 (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Matthew Brettingham
I have nominated Matthew Brettingham for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
| Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
Amendment request: Durova
Hello Giano,
As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current amendment request about the Durova case. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Durova
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Principle 2 of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence)
or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
to2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova
- An intelligent person would leave that disgraceful episode in Misplaced Pages’s ancient history firmly buried in the past. The posting of that far from private email wasn’t the disgrace. The disgrace was why it was necessary to post it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.238.45 (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
FAR notice
I have nominated Palace of Queluz for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Capone'scastle.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Capone'scastle.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |