| Revision as of 05:48, 28 April 2015 editРаціональне анархіст (talk | contribs)2,829 edits →April 28 2015: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:27, 7 August 2018 edit undoMusikBot II (talk | contribs)Bots, Interface administrators, Administrators103,187 edits Notification that access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed due to inactivity |
| (408 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
== Blocked for sockpuppetry == |
|
This is my talk page, aka my home. I will try to keep it clutter free, and you should keep it free of verbal abuse. Thank you very much. If we have an ongoing conversation it will be here. If you want to see my recent conversations use the history. Thank you and have a good day. |
|
|
|
{{Tmbox |
|
|
| style = background: #f8eaba |
|
|
| image = ] |
|
|
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing for ]{{#if:]| per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed == |
|
==Disambiguation link notification for April 21== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello '''FreeatlastChitchat'''! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to ] may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the ]. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">] <sup>]</sup></span></span> 22:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC) |
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Nominating articles for deletion == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I encourage you to nominate obviously inappropriate articles for Speedy Deletion instead of through the regular AFD process. Please see ] for things which qualify for Speedy Deletion. Examples include a simple rephrasing of the title, attack pages, blatant spam, etc. Nominating such articles for "regular" deletion instead of "speedy deletion" will create a backlog at AFD. Thanks for your help, and let me know if you have any questions.– ] (]) 03:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
* Also if you have raised an AfD and then decide speedy is appropriate, go back and close the AfD discussion. Specifically, please close ]. — ] (] '''·''' ]) 09:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tagging == |
|
|
|
|
|
Well if I could tag your page for overtagging I would! You claim ] relies on only one source when it certainly does not. Please don't be so ] at new pages, even if I'm not a newbie. I encourage you to ] when you see a problem instead of drive-by tagging. After all, this is the encyclopedia that ].– ] (]) 04:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:@] I think ] is the only page I have tagged so far with more than two tags. The reason is that I could not find any mention of the word "Rawhide Buttes" in the archived newspaper link given and that only leaves the survey link. Can you please take a look and make sure?] (]) 04:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks for your quick response. In the fourth column, it is written "Incidents are recalled in Wyoming's Rawhide Buttes, where a white man was supposedly skinned alive..." It's been the long-standing consensus that named geographical features usually notable per ].– ] (]) 04:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks man, I'll remove the tag and tidy up the article. cheers ] (]) 04:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::No problem. Thanks for understanding!– ] (]) 05:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==No resolution for dispute== |
|
|
|
|
|
] has informed us that there is no final resolution pertaining to the criticisms. Here is the same message from the Dispute resolution noticeboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
:], it seems that both your source "" as well as my sources are considered unreliable according to Misplaced Pages standards outlined by ]. If this is the case and since there is no final resolution, we should then start deleting all of the references to "" which amounts to maybe 70%-80% of the articles content. Since this may take a lot of time and is seemingly quite a cumbersome task, perhaps we may leave the article as it is and I can introduce my 4 criticisms and you may wish to add your own perspective on the matter after that. After stating the quote of the alleged prophecy by Saritoprak and Adamson(as agreed in issue#1) we may place a heading called "perspective of critics on the alleged prophecy" and under that you may wish to place your own perspective under a different heading. This may be a valid compromise to the issue in which both of our perspectives are addressed. That way we have both perspectives, even if they may be considered from "unreliable" or non-academic sources. ] (]) 05:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== The Governorship of Scott Walker Speedy Deletion == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I recently saw that you tagged the article, ], with A1 and A7 criteria for speedy deletion within two minutes of its creation. In general it is best to wait at least a few minutes before tagging an article unless it is blatantly vandalism or copyright infringement. Even though the article was only two minutes into existence it still passed both A1 and A7. The very short stub of an article still cites two reliable sources about the subject which provide context sufficient to determine what the article is about. Secondly, A7 isn't relevant because the article wasn't about a "Real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organized event" which are the strict categories an article must fall into for A7. (I would even argue that a governorship is an assertion of notability if it were even relevant.) In the future please consider articles more carefully before nominating them for speedy deletion. Thank you and happy patrolling! ] ] 03:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
Thanks ]. And yeah it was my bad, I was thinking of tagging it, but sometimes people don't like drive by taggings, so i just put a CSD so someone else can decide about its notability. ] (]) 03:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:No problem, we all have to learn somewhere. I recommend either PRODing it or just sticking a notability tag at the top. I honestly disagree with hte people who complain about drive by tagging. Tagging articles with problems is the first step to getting those problems solved, but that is a matter of personal preference. Happy editing! ] ] 03:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Formal mediation has been requested == |
|
|
{{Ivmbox |
|
|
| <!---MedComBot-Do-not-remove-this-line-Notified-Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad--->The ] has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. ] is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the ], the ], and the ], '''please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.''' Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 4 May 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.<br> |
|
|
<small>Message delivered by ] (]) on ] of the Mediation Committee. 13:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== April 28 2015 == |
|
|
|
|
|
] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> |
|
|
|
|
|
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. |
|
