Misplaced Pages

Aharon Barak: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:52, 2 May 2015 editKasparBot (talk | contribs)1,549,811 edits authority control moved to wikidata← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 December 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,818 edits Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20 
(126 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Former President of the Supreme Court of Israel}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2012}}

{{Infobox Judge
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}}
|honorific-prefix =
{{Infobox officeholder
|name = Aharon Barak
|honorific-suffix = | honorific-prefix =
|image = Aharon Barak.jpg | name = Aharon Barak
|imagesize = 180px | honorific-suffix =
| native_name = {{No bold|{{Script/Hebrew|אהרן ברק}}}}
|caption =
| image = Aharon barak 01.jpg
|office = President of the ]
| imagesize = 220px
|term_start = 13 August 1995
| caption =
|term_end = 14 September 2006
| office = President of the ]
|appointer =
| term_start = 13 August 1995
|predecessor = ]
| term_end = 14 September 2006
|successor = ]
| predecessor = ]
|birth_date = {{birth date|1936|9|16|df=y}}
| successor = ]
|birth_place = ], Lithuania
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1936|9|16|df=y}}
|death_date =
| birth_place = ], Lithuania
|death_place =
| death_date =
|nationality = Israel
|party = | death_place =
| nationality = Israeli
|spouse = Elisheva Ososkin
| spouse = {{marriage|]|1957|2024|end=her death}}
|children = 4
| children = 4
|alma_mater = ]
| alma_mater = ]
|occupation =
| occupation =
|religion = ]
|signature = | religion =
| parents = Zvi Brick, Leah Brick
| signature = Aharon_Barak_Signature_from_the_Goldman_Collection.png
}} }}


'''Aharon Barak''' ({{lang-he| אהרן ברק}}, born 16 September 1936) is a Professor of Law at the ] in ] and a lecturer in law at the ], the ], ], and the ]. '''Aharon Barak''' ({{langx|he|אהרן ברק}}; born 16 September 1936) is an Israeli lawyer and jurist who served as President of the ] from 1995 to 2006. Prior to this, Barak served as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1978 to 1995, and before this as ] from 1975 to 1978.


Barak was born with the name of Erik Brick in ], Lithuania in 1936. Having survived the Holocaust, he and his family later immigrated to ] in 1947. He studied law, ] and economics at the ], and obtained his ] in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, he was drafted into the ].
Barak was President of the ] from 1995 to 2006. Prior to that, he served as a Justice on the Supreme Court of Israel (1978–95), as the ] (1975–78), and as the Dean of the Law Faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (1974–75).<ref>
{{cite web
| url = http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/1990_1999/1998/6/Aharon+Barak+-+President+of+the+Supreme+Court.htm
| title = Aharon Barak – President of the Supreme Court
| publisher = Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs
| accessdate =21 January 2010
}}</ref>


From 1974 to 1975, Barak was dean of the law faculty of the ].<ref>
==Biography==
{{cite web|title=Aharon Barak – President of the Supreme Court|url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/1990_1999/1998/6/Aharon+Barak+-+President+of+the+Supreme+Court.htm|access-date=21 January 2010|publisher=Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs}}</ref> Barak is currently a law professor at ] in ], and has taught at institutions including ], ], ], and the ].


== Biography ==
===Early life and family===
Aharon Barak (Brick) was born in ], Lithuania, the only son of Zvi Brick, an attorney, and his wife Leah, a teacher. After the Nazi occupation of the city in 1941, the family spent three years in the ]. At the end of the war, after wandering through Hungary, Austria, and Italy, Barak and his parents reached Rome, where they spent the next two years. In 1947, they received travel papers and immigrated to Palestine. After a brief period on a '']'', the family settled in ].<ref name="encyclopedia.jrank.org"> Erik Brick (later Aharon Barak) was born in ], Lithuania, the only son of Zvi Brick, an attorney, and his wife Leah, a teacher. After the Nazi occupation of the city in 1941, the family was in the ]. In an interview with ], Barak told how a Lithuanian farmer saved his life by hiding him under a load of potatoes and smuggling him out of the ghetto, thereby risking his own life if caught.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Avnery |first1=Uri |title=There Are Still Judges… |url=http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1429363587/ |publisher=] |access-date=26 January 2023 |date=18 April 2015}}</ref> At the end of the war, after wandering through Hungary, Austria, and Italy, Barak and his parents reached Rome, where they spent the next two years. In 1947, they received travel papers and ]. After a brief period in a '']'', the family settled in ].{{citation needed|date=August 2022}}
{{cite web
| url = http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/5561/Barak-Aharon-1936.html
| title = Barak, Aharon (1936–) – PERSONAL HISTORY, BIOGRAPHICAL HIGHLIGHTS, PERSONAL CHRONOLOGY:, INFLUENCES AND CONTRIBUTIONS, EXPLORING, Influence on the Israeli Legal System
| publisher = Encyclopedia.jrank.org
| accessdate =21 January 2010
}}</ref>


He studied law, ] and economics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and obtained his ] in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, having been drafted into the ], he served in the office of the ]. Upon discharging his service he returned to the Hebrew University, where he completed his doctoral ] with distinction in 1963. Simultaneously he began work as an ] at the Attorney General's office. When the Attorney General began dealing with the trial of ], Barak, being a holocaust survivor, preferred not to be involved in the work. He was transferred to the ]'s office to complete his internship at his request. Upon completing his internship he was recognised as a certified attorney. He studied law, ] and economics at the ], and obtained his ] in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, having been drafted into the ], he served in the office of the ]. Upon discharging his service he returned to the Hebrew University, where he completed his doctoral ] with distinction in 1963. Simultaneously he began work as an ] at the Attorney General's office. When the Attorney General began dealing with the trial of ], Barak, being a ], preferred not to be involved in the work. At his request, he was transferred to the ]'s office to complete his internship. Upon completing his internship he was recognised as a certified attorney.


Barak is married to Elisheva Ososkin, former vice president of the National Labor Court, with whom he has three daughters and a son, all trained in the law.<ref name="encyclopedia.jrank.org"/> Barak is married to ], former vice president of the ], with whom he has three daughters and a son, all trained in the law.<ref>{{cite web |title=Aharon Barak – Curriculum Vitae|url=https://en.law.huji.ac.il/sites/default/files/lawen/files/cvbarak.pdf |website=Hebrew University of Jerusalem |access-date=13 November 2024}}</ref> Barak's son-in-law Ram Landes made a one-hour documentary film about Barak in 2009 called ''The Judge'' ({{Script/Hebrew|השופט}}), based on an in-depth interview with Barak.


===Academic career=== == Academic career ==
Between 1966 and 1967 Barak studied at ]. In 1968 he was appointed as a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in 1974 was named the Dean of its Law Faculty. In 1975, at 38 years of age, he was awarded the ] for legal research. In the same year he became a member of the ]. In 1978 he became a foreign member of the ]. Between 1966 and 1967 Barak studied at ]. In 1968 he was appointed as a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in 1974 was named the dean of its law faculty. In 1975, at age 38, he was awarded the ] for legal research. In the same year he became a member of the ]. In 1978 he became a foreign member of the ].


After his retirement from the Supreme Court, Barak joined the staff of the ] in Herzliya, and he teaches in the master's degree program for Commercial Law. He also lectures in the ] program. In addition, he continues to lecture at both the ] and the ] in the United States, as well as lecturing as a Distinguished Visitor at the ].
===Attorney General of Israel===
==Judicial career==
=== Attorney General of Israel ===
Between 1975 and 1978, Barak served as the Attorney General of Israel. Among his well-known decisions in this capacity were: Between 1975 and 1978, Barak served as the Attorney General of Israel. Among his well-known decisions in this capacity were:


* The decision to launch a criminal investigation against ], CEO of ] and a nominee for the position of director of the ]. Yadlin was convicted of accepting a bribe and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. During this incident Barak coined the so-called ]. * The decision to launch a criminal investigation against ], CEO of ] and a nominee for the position of director of the ]. Yadlin was convicted of accepting a bribe and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. During this incident Barak coined the so-called ].
* The decision to continue with the police investigation of ] ], despite the Minister's request that the investigation be terminated. Ofer committed suicide in 1977, prior to the conclusion of the investigation. * The decision to continue with the police investigation of ] ], despite the Minister's request that the investigation be terminated. Ofer committed suicide in 1977, prior to the conclusion of the investigation.
* The decision to prosecute ] due to the ]. This decision brought about the resignation of the Israeli Prime Minister ]. In justifying his decision not to prosecute Yitzhak Rabin for the affair, Barak has argued that "Rabin was severely punished in that he was forced to resign from his position. There was no room to punish him further." * The decision to prosecute ] due to the ]. This decision brought about the resignation of the Israeli Prime Minister ]. In justifying his decision not to prosecute Yitzhak Rabin for the affair, Barak has argued that "Rabin was severely punished in that he was forced to resign from his position. There was no room to punish him further."


] with (l-r) ], ], and ], 1978]] ] with (l-r) ], ], and ], 1978]]
Barak was appointed by Israeli Prime Minister ] in 1978 as the legal advisor to the Israeli delegation for negotiating the ]. In his book '']'', ] praises Barak as a negotiator despite the political disagreements between them.<ref> Barak was appointed by Israeli Prime Minister ] in 1978 as the legal advisor to the Israeli delegation for negotiating the ]. In his book '']'', ] praises Barak as a negotiator despite the political disagreements between them.<ref>
{{cite book {{cite book
| last = Carter | last = Carter
| first = James Earl | first = James Earl
| authorlink = Jimmy Carter | author-link = Jimmy Carter
| title = Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid | title = Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
| url = https://archive.org/details/palestinepeaceno00cart
| url-access = registration
| publisher = Simon and Schuster | publisher = Simon and Schuster
| location = New York | location = New York
| year = 2006 | year = 2006
| page =
| page = 46
| isbn = 978-0-7432-8502-5 | isbn = 978-0-7432-8502-5
}}</ref> }}</ref>


===Supreme Court of Israel=== === Supreme Court of Israel ===
On 22 September 1978, Barak began his service as a Justice of the ] – the youngest of all of the judges. In 1982–83 he served as a member of the ], a state investigation committee formed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the ]. As part of the committee's conclusions, then Minister of Defense ] was removed from his position. The committee further recommended that he never be appointed to that position again in the future. In 1993, with the retirement of the Deputy President of the Supreme Court ], Barak was appointed the Deputy President. Subsequently, with the retirement of the President ] on 13 August 1995, Barak was appointed the President of the Supreme Court.


On 22 September 1978, Barak began his service as a Justice on the ] the youngest of all of the judges. In the course of his service on the Supreme Court, Barak greatly expanded the range of issues with which the court dealt.<ref>

In 1982–83 he served as a member of the ], a state investigation committee formed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the ]. As part of the committee's conclusions, then Minister of Defense ] was removed from his position. The committee further recommended that he never be appointed to that position again in the future. In 1993, with the retirement of the Deputy President of the Supreme Court ], Barak was appointed the Deputy President. Subsequently, with the retirement of the President ] on 13 August 1995, Barak was appointed the President of the Supreme Court.

In the course of his service on the Supreme Court Barak greatly expanded the range of issues with which the court dealt.<ref>
{{Cite journal {{Cite journal
| url = http://www.azure.org.il/article.php?id=395 | url = http://www.azure.org.il/article.php?id=395
Line 92: Line 84:
| volume = Winter 5758 | volume = Winter 5758
| issue = 3 | issue = 3
| accessdate =24 January 2011 | access-date =24 January 2011
}}</ref> He canceled the ] test which Israel's Supreme Court had used frequently, and greatly expanded the scope of ] by allowing petitions on a range of matters. Professor ] commented that: }} {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090501154533/https://www.daat.ac.il/DAAT/ezrachut/english/hillel.htm |date=1 May 2009 }}</ref> He canceled the ] test which Israel's Supreme Court had used frequently, and greatly expanded the scope of ] by allowing petitions on a range of matters. Professor Daphna Barak-Erez commented that:"One of the most significant impacts of Judge Barak on Israeli law is found in the change which he led with regard to all matters of justiciability. Judge Barak was the instigator and leader of the outlook which regards the traditional doctrine of justiciability as inappropriately and unnecessarily limiting the matters which the court deals with. Under the leadership of Judge Barak, the Supreme Court significantly increased the fields in which it is ."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hapraklit.co.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/nun1_2.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2009-10-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110721135412/http://www.hapraklit.co.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/nun1_2.pdf |archive-date=21 July 2011}}</ref>

<blockquote>One of the most significant impacts of Judge Barak on Israeli law is found in the change which he led with regard to all matters of justiciability. Judge Barak was the instigator and leader of the outlook which regards the traditional doctrine of justiciability as inappropriately and unnecessarily limiting the matters which the court deals with. Under the leadership of Judge Barak, the Supreme Court significantly increased the fields in which it is .<ref>http://www.hapraklit.co.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/nun1_2.pdf</ref></blockquote>


Simultaneously, he advanced a number of standards, both for ] (mainly, the standard of the reasonableness of the administrative decision) and in the ] (the standard of ]), while blurring the distinction between the two. Barak's critics have argued that, in doing so, the Supreme Court under his leadership harmed judicial consistency and stability, particularly in the private sector.<ref> Simultaneously, he advanced a number of standards, both for ] (mainly, the standard of the reasonableness of the administrative decision) and in the ] (the standard of ]), while blurring the distinction between the two. Barak's critics have argued that, in doing so, the Supreme Court under his leadership harmed judicial consistency and stability, particularly in the private sector.<ref>
{{cite web {{cite web
| url = http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695 | url = http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695
| archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20071217204226/http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070313010225/http://www.makorrishon.co.il/show.asp?id=16695
| archive-date=13 March 2007| title = השופט כבוחן כליות ולב
| archivedate = 17 December 2007
| title = מקור ראשון העיתון הכי יהודי בעולם
| publisher = Makorrishon.co.il | publisher = Makorrishon.co.il
| accessdate =22 September 2010 | access-date =22 September 2010
}}</ref>
}} {{Dead link|date=January 2011}}</ref>


Since 1992, much of his judicial work was focused on advancing and shaping Israel's ] (a phrase which he coined), which he believed was brought about by the adoption of ] in the Israeli ] dealing with human rights. According to Barak's approach, which was adopted by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Revolution brought values such as the Right to Equality, Freedom of Employment and Freedom of Speech to a position of normative supremacy, and thereby granted the courts (not just the Supreme Court) the ability to strike down legislation which is inconsistent with the rights embodied in the Basic Laws. Consequently, Barak held that the State of Israel has been transformed from a ] to a constitutional parliamentary democracy, in that its Basic Laws were to be interpreted as its constitution.<ref> After 1992, much of his judicial work was focused on advancing and shaping Israel's '']'' (a phrase which he coined), which he believed was brought about by the adoption of ] in the Israeli ] dealing with human rights. According to Barak's approach, which was adopted by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Revolution brought values such as the Right to Equality, Freedom of Employment and Freedom of Speech to a position of normative supremacy, and thereby granted the courts (not just the Supreme Court) the ability to strike down legislation which is inconsistent with the rights embodied in the Basic Laws. Consequently, Barak held that the State of Israel has been transformed from a ] to a constitutional parliamentary democracy, in that its Basic Laws were to be interpreted as its constitution.<ref>
{{cite web {{cite web
| url = http://huka.gov.il/index.php/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C:208 |url=http://huka.gov.il/index.php/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C:208
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929094535/http://huka.gov.il/index.php/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%9C%3A208
| script-title=he:פרוטוקול:208 – חוקה בהסכמה רחבה
|url-status=dead
| language = he
|archive-date=29 September 2007
| publisher = Huka.gov.il
|script-title=he:פרוטוקול:208 – חוקה בהסכמה רחבה
| accessdate =22 September 2010}}</ref>
|language=he
|publisher=Huka.gov.il
|access-date=22 September 2010
}}</ref>


During his time as President of the Supreme Court, Barak advanced a ] approach, whereby the court was not required to limit itself to ], but rather was permitted to fill the gaps in the law through judicial legislation at ]. This approach was highly controversial and was met with much opposition, including by some politicians. The Israeli legal commentator Ze'ev Segal wrote in a 2004 article, "Barak sees the Supreme Court as a , far beyond the primary role as a decisor in disputes. The Supreme Court under his leadership is fulfilling a central role in the shaping of Israeli law, not much less than the Knesset. Barak is the leading power in the court, as a key judge in it for a quarter of a century, and as the number 1 judge for some 10 years now." During his time as President of the Supreme Court, Barak advanced a ] approach, whereby the court was not required to limit itself to ], but rather was permitted to fill the gaps in the law through judicial legislation at ]. This approach was highly controversial and was met with much opposition, including by some politicians. The Israeli legal commentator Ze'ev Segal wrote in a 2004 article, "Barak sees the Supreme Court as a , far beyond the primary role as a decisor in disputes. The Supreme Court under his leadership is fulfilling a central role in the shaping of Israeli law, not much less than the Knesset. Barak is the leading power in the court, as a key judge in it for a quarter of a century, and as the number 1 judge for some 10 years now."
Line 119: Line 112:
On 14 September 2006, upon reaching the mandatory age, Barak retired from the Supreme Court. Three months later he published his final judgments, among them a number of ] regarding damages in ] for residents of the ], Israel's policy of ], and preferential treatment for IDF veterans. On 14 September 2006, upon reaching the mandatory age, Barak retired from the Supreme Court. Three months later he published his final judgments, among them a number of ] regarding damages in ] for residents of the ], Israel's policy of ], and preferential treatment for IDF veterans.


Parallel to his service in the Supreme Court, Barak also served as the head of a committee which, for some twenty years, drafted the Israeli ], which united the 24 main civil law statutes in Israeli law under a single comprehensive law. Parallel to his service in the Supreme Court, Barak also served as the head of a committee which, for some twenty years, drafted the Israeli ], which worked to unite the 24 main civil law statutes in Israeli law under a single comprehensive law.

===Resumption of academic career===
After his retirement from the Supreme Court, Barak joined the staff of the ] in Herzliya, and he teaches in the Masters' Degree program for Commercial Law. He also lectures in the ] program. In addition, he continues to lecture at both the ] and the ] in the United States, as well as lecturing as a Distinguished Visitor at the ] ].


==Important judgments== ==== Selected judgments ====
] ]
* CA 6821/93 '''United Hamizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi''' 49(4) P.D 221: The judgment in which Barak, together with other judges, described the ] as he understood it, which began following the legislation of ] and ]. In this case it was held that the Supreme Court could strike down Knesset legislation which is inconsistent with these Basic Laws. * CA 6821/93 ''United Hamizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi'' 49(4) P.D 221: The judgment in which Barak, together with other judges, described the ] as he understood it, which began following the legislation of ] and ]. In this case it was held that the Supreme Court could strike down Knesset legislation which is inconsistent with these Basic Laws.
* CA 243/83 '''The Jerusalem Municipality v. Gordon''', 39(1) P.D 113: In this judgment Barak reformed key aspects of Israeli ]. * CA 243/83 ''The Jerusalem Municipality v. Gordon'', 39(1) P.D 113: In this judgment Barak reformed key aspects of Israeli ].
* HC 3269/95 '''Katz v. Regional Rabbinical Court''', 50(4) P.D 590: In this judgment Barak held, sitting as Deputy President to ], that the laws pertaining to property disputes arising from divorce are not caused by the act of marriage and thus are not to be regarded as matters of marriage. Rather, they derive from an agreement between the parties and are an aspect of the freedom of association. This case established that the Israeli ] must apply the doctrine of joint matrimonial property, a doctrine based in Israeli common law rather than the ] (Jewish religious law). * HC 3269/95 ''Katz v. Regional Rabbinical Court'', 50(4) P.D 590: In this judgment Barak held, sitting as Deputy President to ], that the laws pertaining to property disputes arising from divorce are not caused by the act of marriage and thus are not to be regarded as matters of marriage. Rather, they derive from an agreement between the parties and are an aspect of the freedom of association. This case established that the Israeli ] must apply the doctrine of joint matrimonial property, a doctrine based in Israeli common law rather than the ] (Jewish religious law).
* CA 4628/93 '''State of Israel v. Guardian of Housing and Initiatives (1991) Ltd.''', 49(2) P.D 265: In this judgment Barak proposed a new approach to contract construction, holding that a lot of weight should be given to the circumstances which led to the formation of the contract. Some aspects of Barak's views in this regard remain controversial, but his general approach to contract construction is today accepted by the Supreme Court. * CA 4628/93 ''State of Israel v. Guardian of Housing and Initiatives (1991) Ltd.'', 49(2) P.D 265: In this judgment Barak proposed a new approach to contract construction, holding that a lot of weight should be given to the circumstances which led to the formation of the contract. Some aspects of Barak's views in this regard remain controversial, but his general approach to contract construction is today accepted by the Supreme Court.
* CA 165/82 '''Kibbutz Hatzor v Assessing Officer''', 39(2) P.D 70: This judgment was a turning point in the interpretation of ] in Israel, in establishing that a ] was generally preferred to ] in determining the meaning of the law. * CA 165/82 ''Kibbutz Hatzor v Assessing Officer'', 39(2) P.D 70: This judgment was a turning point in the interpretation of ] in Israel, in establishing that a ] was generally preferred to ] in determining the meaning of the law.
* FH 40/80 '''Koenig v. Cohen''', 36(3) P.D 701: In this judgment Barak, in the minority, expounded upon his approach to interpreting legislation. Today this approach has become an acceptable approach to statutory interpretation. * FH 40/80 ''Koenig v. Cohen'', 36(3) P.D 701: In this judgment Barak, in the minority, expounded upon his approach to interpreting legislation. Today this approach has become an acceptable approach to statutory interpretation.
* CA 817/79, '''Kossoy v. Y.L. Feuchtwanger Bank Ltd.''', 38(3) P.D 253: In this judgment Barak imposed a duty of fairness upon one who controls a company, holding that one who controls a company cannot sell his shares of the company when as a consequence of doing so the company, and thus its shareholders, would be harmed. * CA 817/79, ''Kossoy v. Y.L. Feuchtwanger Bank Ltd.'', 38(3) P.D 253: In this judgment Barak imposed a duty of fairness upon one who controls a company, holding that one who controls a company cannot sell his shares of the company when as a consequence of doing so the company, and thus its shareholders, would be harmed.


=== South Africa v. Israel ===
==Impact, praise and criticism==
Barak's decisions as President of the Supreme Court impacted many aspects of life in Israel, and were the subject of both praise and criticism. Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's ] as its constitution, and challenged ] laws on that basis. Two of his books on legal commentary have been translated to English.


On January 11, 2024, the Israeli government appointed Barak as an ad hoc judge to serve on the ] case ], brought against Israel by ] on charges of ].<ref>{{cite news
Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, the new President of the Court, Judge ], said at his farewell ceremony:
| last1 = Berman
| last2 = Horowitz
| last3 = Sharon
| first1 = Lazar
| first2 = Michael
| first3 = Jeremy
| date = 7 January 2024
| title = Israel tasks ex-Supreme Court chief Aharon Barak to serve at Hague genocide hearings
| url = https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-tasks-ex-supreme-court-chief-aharon-barak-to-serve-at-hague-genocide-hearings/
| access-date = 10 January 2024
}}</ref> In this role, Barak voted against several of the provisional measures the ICJ imposed on Israel, such as preventing acts of genocide, protecting evidence, and facilitating humanitarian aid, suggesting he found insufficient basis in the evidence for these specific requirements.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Separate opinion of Judge ad hoc Barak {{!}} INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE |url=https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203859 |access-date=2024-11-13 |website=www.icj-cij.org}}</ref>


On June 5, 2024, Barak resigned from his role as an ad hoc judge, citing personal reasons.<ref>{{Cite news |date=5 June 2024 |title=Aharon Barak steps down from role as ad hoc judge at ICJ for personal reasons |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/aharon-barak-steps-down-from-role-as-ad-hoc-judge-at-icj-for-personal-reasons/ |work=Times of Israel}}</ref>
<blockquote>At the heart of the development of the law of Israel stands Aharon Barak. He opened new horizons. The law as it stands after his differs in its purpose from the era which preceded him. Since his first year in the Supreme Court his rulings were groundbreaking, since '78 and until today he set the central legal norms that this court granted Israeli society.</blockquote>


On the issue of the substantial expansion of the ] and the test of reasonableness of an administrative decision (which grants the courts the power to overrule an administrative decision if the judge is convinced that it does not "stand bounds of reasonableness"), ] wrote:


<blockquote>Thus a situation has arisen whereby the Supreme Court may convene and decide on every conceivable issue. In addition to that the unreasonableness of an administrative decision will be grounds for judicial intervention. This was a total revolution in the judicial thinking which characterized the Supreme Court of previous generations, and this has given it the reputation of the most activist court in the world, causing both admiration and criticism. In practice, in many respects the Supreme Court under Barak has become an alternate government.</blockquote>


==Views and opinions==
Among critics of Barak's judicial activism are former President of the Supreme Court of Israel ], ], and ]. Posner, a judge on the ] and authority on jurisprudence, criticised Barak's decision to interpret the Basic Laws as Israel's constitution, stating that "only in Israel ... do judges confer the power of abstract review on themselves, without benefit of a constitutional or legislative provision."<ref name=Posner>
Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's ] as its constitution, and challenged Knesset laws on that basis. Barak's legal philosophy starts with the belief that "the world is filled with law". This idea portrays law as an all-encompassing framework of human affairs from which no action can ever be immune: Whatever the law does not prohibit, it permits; either way, the law always has its say, on everything.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090501154533/https://www.daat.ac.il/DAAT/ezrachut/english/hillel.htm |date=1 May 2009 }}</ref>
Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, the new President of the Court, Judge ], said at his farewell ceremony: "At the heart of the development of the law of Israel stands Aharon Barak. He opened new horizons. The law as it stands after his differs in its purpose from the era which preceded him. Since his first year in the Supreme Court his rulings were groundbreaking, since '78 and until today he set the central legal norms that this court granted Israeli society."

On the issue of the substantial expansion of the ] and the test of reasonableness of an administrative decision (which grants the courts the power to overrule an administrative decision if the judge is convinced that it does not "stand bounds of reasonableness"), ] wrote:" Thus a situation has arisen whereby the Supreme Court may convene and decide on every conceivable issue. In addition to that the unreasonableness of an administrative decision will be grounds for judicial intervention. This was a total revolution in the judicial thinking which characterized the Supreme Court of previous generations, and this has given it the reputation of the most activist court in the world, causing both admiration and criticism. In practice, in many respects the Supreme Court under Barak has become an alternate government."

Barak is a secular Jew but believes in compromise with the religious sector, and state support for religion.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} His judgments on the interaction between religion and state have led to hostility towards him by some in the religious public. Religious Jews from all sectors of society (including both ] and ]) held a mass protest against the Supreme Court under his presidency, after the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of divorce the Israeli ] are required to decide property disputes according to the law of the Knesset rather than according to the ].{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}}
==Criticism==
Among critics of Barak's judicial activism are former President of the Supreme Court of Israel ], ], and ]. Posner, a judge on the ] and authority on jurisprudence, criticised Barak's decision to interpret the Basic Laws as Israel's constitution, stating that "only in Israel ... do judges confer the power of abstract review on themselves, without benefit of a constitutional or legislative provision."<ref name=Posner>
{{cite web {{cite web
| last = Posner | last = Posner
| first = Richard A. | first = Richard A.
| authorlink = Richard Posner | author-link = Richard Posner
| url = http://www.tnr.com/print/article/enlightened-despot | url = https://newrepublic.com/article/60919/enlightened-despot
| title = Enlightened Despot | title = Enlightened Despot
| publisher = The New Republic | publisher = The New Republic
| date = 23 April 2007 | date = 23 April 2007
| accessdate =21 January 2010 | access-date =21 January 2010
}}</ref> He also argues that Barak's idea of the courts enforcing a set of rights which they find in "substantive" democracy, rather than merely democratic political rights, actually involves a curtailing of democracy and results in a "hyperactive judiciary."<ref name=Posner /> Furthermore, he claims that Barak's approach to the interpretation of statutes involves, in practice, interpretation in the context of the judge's own personal ideal system, and "opens up a vast realm for discretionary judgment", rather than providing for an objective interpretation of the statute.<ref name=Posner /> He is also critical of Barak's view of the ], arguing that, in effect, it is that "judicial power is unlimited and the legislature cannot remove judges."<ref name=Posner /> He also asserts that Barak fails to apply his own judicial philosophy in practice at times.<ref name=Posner /> Nevertheless, Posner said that "Barak himself is by all accounts brilliant, as well as austere and high-minded – Israel's Cato", and that while he would not regard Barak's judicial approach as a desirable universal model, it may be suited to Israel's specific circumstances.<ref name=Posner /> He also suggested that if there were a ] for law, Barak would likely be among its early recipients.<ref name=Posner /> }}</ref> He also argues that Barak's idea of the courts enforcing a set of rights which they find in "substantive" democracy, rather than merely democratic political rights, actually involves a curtailing of democracy and results in a "hyperactive judiciary."<ref name=Posner /> Furthermore, he claims that Barak's approach to the interpretation of statutes involves, in practice, interpretation in the context of the judge's own personal ideal system, and "opens up a vast realm for discretionary judgment", rather than providing for an objective interpretation of the statute.<ref name=Posner /> He is also critical of Barak's view of the ], arguing that, in effect, it is that "judicial power is unlimited and the legislature cannot remove judges."<ref name=Posner /> He also asserts that Barak fails to apply his own judicial philosophy in practice at times.<ref name=Posner /> Nevertheless, Posner said that "Barak himself is by all accounts brilliant, as well as austere and high-minded – Israel's Cato", and that while he would not regard Barak's judicial approach as a desirable universal model, it may be suited to Israel's specific circumstances.<ref name=Posner /> He also suggested that if there were a ] for law, Barak would likely be among its early recipients.<ref name=Posner />


Beyond the legal community, on both the left and right of the political spectrum, there are those who were highly critical of Barak. His judgments on matters of security, in particular, have been subject to criticism by some on both the left and the right.<ref>http://www.inn.co.il/SendMail.aspx?print=print&type=0&item=157246</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=640371 |title=אצלי זה פוליטי, נקודה – מוסף הארץ – הארץ |publisher=Haaretz |accessdate=22 September 2010}}</ref><ref>http://www.yeshgvul.org/shame_0107_e.asp</ref> His judgments on matters of security have been subject to criticism by some on both the left and the right.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.inn.co.il/SendMail.aspx?print%3Dprint%26type%3D0%26item%3D157246 |title=ערוץ 7 - רשת תקשורת ישראלית |access-date=2009-10-29 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103209/http://www.inn.co.il/SendMail.aspx?print=print&type=0&item=157246 |archive-date=29 September 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=640371 |title=אצלי זה פוליטי, נקודה – מוסף הארץ – הארץ |publisher=Haaretz |access-date=22 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605022850/http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=640371 |archive-date=5 June 2011 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.yeshgvul.org/shame_0107_e.asp |title=Archived copy |access-date=2009-10-29 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091101104846/http://www.yeshgvul.org/shame_0107_e.asp |archive-date=1 November 2009}}</ref>{{Vague|date=January 2024|reason=What judgments? What criticism?}}

Barak is a secular Jew but believes in compromise with the religious sector, and state support for religion.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} His judgments on the interaction between religion and state have led to hostility towards him by some in the religious public. Religious Jews from all sectors of society (including both ] and ]) held a mass protest against the Supreme Court under his Presidency, after the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of divorce the Israeli ] are required to decide property disputes according to the law of the ] rather than according to the ].{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}}


==Key legal doctrines== ==Key legal doctrines==
Line 165: Line 169:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]<ref> (Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture 2009)</ref> * ]<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090826162114/http://www.fljs.org/section.aspx?id=2895 |date=26 August 2009 }} (Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture 2009)</ref>
* ] * ]


== Awards and recognition==
Barak's legal philosophy starts with the belief that "the world is filled with law." This idea portrays law as an all-encompassing framework of human affairs from which no action can ever be immune: Whatever the law does not prohibit, it permits; either way, the law always has its say, on everything.<ref></ref>
* In 1975, Barak was awarded the ], in jurisprudence.<ref name="prize">{{cite web|title=Israel Prize Official Site – Recipients in 1975 (in Hebrew)|url=http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/PrasIsrael/Tashlag/Tashmab_Tashlag_Rikuz.htm?DictionaryKey=Tashlah}}</ref>

* In 1987, he was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the ].<ref name="AAAS">{{cite web|title=Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter B|url=http://www.amacad.org/publications/BookofMembers/ChapterB.pdf|access-date=17 May 2011|publisher=American Academy of Arts and Sciences}}</ref>
==Awards and honors==
* In 1975, Barak was awarded the ], in jurisprudence.<ref name=prize>{{cite web|title=Israel Prize Official Site – Recipients in 1975 (in Hebrew)|url=http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/PrasIsrael/Tashlag/Tashmab_Tashlag_Rikuz.htm?DictionaryKey=Tashlah}}</ref>
* In 1987, he was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the ].<ref name=AAAS>{{cite web|title=Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter B|url=http://www.amacad.org/publications/BookofMembers/ChapterB.pdf|publisher=American Academy of Arts and Sciences|accessdate=17 May 2011}}</ref>
* In 2003, he received Honorary Degrees from ]. * In 2003, he received Honorary Degrees from ].
* In 2006, he received the Justice Prize of the Peter Gruber Foundation for "outstanding courage and principle who has devoted his life to the promotion of justice and the just rule of law."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gruberprizes.org/GruberPrizes/Justice_PressRelease.php?awardid=1|title=2006 Gruber Justice Prize Press Release|accessdate=21 January 2010}}</ref> * In 2006, he received the Justice Prize of the Peter Gruber Foundation for "outstanding courage and principle who has devoted his life to the promotion of justice and the just rule of law."<ref>{{cite web|title=2006 Gruber Justice Prize Press Release|url=http://www.gruberprizes.org/GruberPrizes/Justice_PressRelease.php?awardid=1|access-date=21 January 2010}}</ref>
* In 2007, he received Honorary Degrees from ]. * In 2007, he received Honorary Degrees from ].


==Published works== ==Published works==
* ''Judicial Discretion'' (1989) ISBN 978-0-300-04099-9 * ''Judicial Discretion'' (1989) {{ISBN|978-0-300-04099-9}}
* ''Purposive Interpretation in Law'' (2005) ISBN 978-0-691-12007-2 Book review.<ref> * ''Purposive Interpretation in Law'' (2005) {{ISBN|978-0-691-12007-2}} Book review.<ref>
{{cite journal {{cite journal
| last = Kahn |last=Kahn
| first = Ronald |first=Ronald
| url = http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/barak0906.htm |url=http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/barak0906.htm
| title = PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW, by Aharon Barak |title=PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW, by Aharon Barak
| journal = Law and Politics Book Review |journal=Law and Politics Book Review
| volume = 16 |volume=16
| issue = 9 |issue=9
| date = September 2006 |date=September 2006
| pages = 708–738 |pages=708–738
|url-status=dead
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101206063014/http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/barak0906.htm
|archive-date=6 December 2010
}}</ref> }}</ref>
* ''The Judge in a Democracy'' (2006) ISBN 978-0-691-12017-1 * ''The Judge in a Democracy'' (2006) {{ISBN|978-0-691-12017-1}}
* ''Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations'' (2012) {{isbn|978-1-107-40119-8}}
* ''Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right'' (2015) {{isbn|978-1-107-09023-1}}
* *


Line 199: Line 206:


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|28em}} {{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Commons category|Aharon Barak}}
{{Commonscat}}
* – in the online exhibition "To Build and To Be Built" – The Contribution of Holocaust Survivors to the State of Israel – Yad Vashem * – in the online exhibition "To Build and To Be Built" – The Contribution of Holocaust Survivors to the State of Israel – Yad Vashem
* (Princeton University Press, 2006) * (Princeton University Press, 2006)
* *
* *
*
* *
* Video of a lecture by Aharon Barak for the Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, Oxford, 2009 * Video of a lecture by Aharon Barak for the Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, Oxford, 2009
Line 216: Line 222:
{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ]. -->
| NAME =Barak, Aharon
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = Israeli judge
| DATE OF BIRTH =16 September 1936
| PLACE OF BIRTH =], Lithuania
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Barak, Aharon}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Barak, Aharon}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 December 2024

Former President of the Supreme Court of Israel

Aharon Barak
אהרן ברק‎
President of the Supreme Court of Israel
In office
13 August 1995 – 14 September 2006
Preceded byMeir Shamgar
Succeeded byDorit Beinisch
Personal details
Born (1936-09-16) 16 September 1936 (age 88)
Kaunas, Lithuania
NationalityIsraeli
Spouse Elisheva Barak-Ussoskin ​ ​(m. 1957; died 2024)
Children4
Parent(s)Zvi Brick, Leah Brick
Alma materHebrew University of Jerusalem
Signature

Aharon Barak (Hebrew: אהרן ברק; born 16 September 1936) is an Israeli lawyer and jurist who served as President of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1995 to 2006. Prior to this, Barak served as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1978 to 1995, and before this as Attorney General of Israel from 1975 to 1978.

Barak was born with the name of Erik Brick in Kaunas, Lithuania in 1936. Having survived the Holocaust, he and his family later immigrated to Mandatory Palestine in 1947. He studied law, international relations and economics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and obtained his Bachelor of Laws in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, he was drafted into the Israeli military.

From 1974 to 1975, Barak was dean of the law faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Barak is currently a law professor at Reichman University in Herzliya, and has taught at institutions including Yale Law School, Central European University, Georgetown University Law Center, and the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.

Biography

Erik Brick (later Aharon Barak) was born in Kaunas, Lithuania, the only son of Zvi Brick, an attorney, and his wife Leah, a teacher. After the Nazi occupation of the city in 1941, the family was in the Kovno ghetto. In an interview with HaOlam HaZeh, Barak told how a Lithuanian farmer saved his life by hiding him under a load of potatoes and smuggling him out of the ghetto, thereby risking his own life if caught. At the end of the war, after wandering through Hungary, Austria, and Italy, Barak and his parents reached Rome, where they spent the next two years. In 1947, they received travel papers and immigrated to Mandatory Palestine. After a brief period in a moshav, the family settled in Jerusalem.

He studied law, international relations and economics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and obtained his Bachelor of Laws in 1958. Between 1958 and 1960, having been drafted into the Israeli Defense Forces, he served in the office of the Financial Advisor to the Chief of Staff. Upon discharging his service he returned to the Hebrew University, where he completed his doctoral dissertation with distinction in 1963. Simultaneously he began work as an intern at the Attorney General's office. When the Attorney General began dealing with the trial of Adolf Eichmann, Barak, being a Holocaust survivor, preferred not to be involved in the work. At his request, he was transferred to the State Attorney's office to complete his internship. Upon completing his internship he was recognised as a certified attorney.

Barak is married to Elisheva Barak-Ussoskin, former vice president of the National Labor Court, with whom he has three daughters and a son, all trained in the law. Barak's son-in-law Ram Landes made a one-hour documentary film about Barak in 2009 called The Judge (השופט‎), based on an in-depth interview with Barak.

Academic career

Between 1966 and 1967 Barak studied at Harvard University. In 1968 he was appointed as a professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and in 1974 was named the dean of its law faculty. In 1975, at age 38, he was awarded the Israel Prize for legal research. In the same year he became a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. In 1978 he became a foreign member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

After his retirement from the Supreme Court, Barak joined the staff of the Reichman University in Herzliya, and he teaches in the master's degree program for Commercial Law. He also lectures in the Bachelor of Laws program. In addition, he continues to lecture at both the Yale Law School and the University of Alabama in the United States, as well as lecturing as a Distinguished Visitor at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.

Judicial career

Attorney General of Israel

Between 1975 and 1978, Barak served as the Attorney General of Israel. Among his well-known decisions in this capacity were:

  • The decision to launch a criminal investigation against Asher Yadlin, CEO of Clalit Health Services and a nominee for the position of director of the Bank of Israel. Yadlin was convicted of accepting a bribe and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. During this incident Barak coined the so-called Buzaglo test.
  • The decision to continue with the police investigation of Housing and Construction Minister Avraham Ofer, despite the Minister's request that the investigation be terminated. Ofer committed suicide in 1977, prior to the conclusion of the investigation.
  • The decision to prosecute Leah Rabin due to the Dollar Account affair. This decision brought about the resignation of the Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. In justifying his decision not to prosecute Yitzhak Rabin for the affair, Barak has argued that "Rabin was severely punished in that he was forced to resign from his position. There was no room to punish him further."
Barak (sitting; left) at a meeting at Camp David with (l-r) Menachem Begin, Anwar Sadat, and Ezer Weizmann, 1978

Barak was appointed by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in 1978 as the legal advisor to the Israeli delegation for negotiating the Camp David Accords. In his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, Jimmy Carter praises Barak as a negotiator despite the political disagreements between them.

Supreme Court of Israel

On 22 September 1978, Barak began his service as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel – the youngest of all of the judges. In 1982–83 he served as a member of the Kahan Commission, a state investigation committee formed to investigate the circumstances surrounding the Sabra and Shatila massacre. As part of the committee's conclusions, then Minister of Defense Ariel Sharon was removed from his position. The committee further recommended that he never be appointed to that position again in the future. In 1993, with the retirement of the Deputy President of the Supreme Court Menachem Elon, Barak was appointed the Deputy President. Subsequently, with the retirement of the President Meir Shamgar on 13 August 1995, Barak was appointed the President of the Supreme Court.

In the course of his service on the Supreme Court, Barak greatly expanded the range of issues with which the court dealt. He canceled the standing test which Israel's Supreme Court had used frequently, and greatly expanded the scope of justiciability by allowing petitions on a range of matters. Professor Daphna Barak-Erez commented that:"One of the most significant impacts of Judge Barak on Israeli law is found in the change which he led with regard to all matters of justiciability. Judge Barak was the instigator and leader of the outlook which regards the traditional doctrine of justiciability as inappropriately and unnecessarily limiting the matters which the court deals with. Under the leadership of Judge Barak, the Supreme Court significantly increased the fields in which it is ."

Simultaneously, he advanced a number of standards, both for public administration (mainly, the standard of the reasonableness of the administrative decision) and in the private sector (the standard of good faith), while blurring the distinction between the two. Barak's critics have argued that, in doing so, the Supreme Court under his leadership harmed judicial consistency and stability, particularly in the private sector.

After 1992, much of his judicial work was focused on advancing and shaping Israel's Constitutional Revolution (a phrase which he coined), which he believed was brought about by the adoption of Basic Laws in the Israeli Knesset dealing with human rights. According to Barak's approach, which was adopted by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Revolution brought values such as the Right to Equality, Freedom of Employment and Freedom of Speech to a position of normative supremacy, and thereby granted the courts (not just the Supreme Court) the ability to strike down legislation which is inconsistent with the rights embodied in the Basic Laws. Consequently, Barak held that the State of Israel has been transformed from a parliamentary democracy to a constitutional parliamentary democracy, in that its Basic Laws were to be interpreted as its constitution.

During his time as President of the Supreme Court, Barak advanced a judicial activist approach, whereby the court was not required to limit itself to judicial interpretation, but rather was permitted to fill the gaps in the law through judicial legislation at common law. This approach was highly controversial and was met with much opposition, including by some politicians. The Israeli legal commentator Ze'ev Segal wrote in a 2004 article, "Barak sees the Supreme Court as a , far beyond the primary role as a decisor in disputes. The Supreme Court under his leadership is fulfilling a central role in the shaping of Israeli law, not much less than the Knesset. Barak is the leading power in the court, as a key judge in it for a quarter of a century, and as the number 1 judge for some 10 years now."

On 14 September 2006, upon reaching the mandatory age, Barak retired from the Supreme Court. Three months later he published his final judgments, among them a number of precedents regarding damages in tort for residents of the Palestinian territories, Israel's policy of targeted killing, and preferential treatment for IDF veterans.

Parallel to his service in the Supreme Court, Barak also served as the head of a committee which, for some twenty years, drafted the Israeli Civil Codex, which worked to unite the 24 main civil law statutes in Israeli law under a single comprehensive law.

Selected judgments

Barak's portrait at Supreme Court of Israel
  • CA 6821/93 United Hamizrahi Bank Ltd. v. Migdal Kfar Shitufi 49(4) P.D 221: The judgment in which Barak, together with other judges, described the Constitutional Revolution as he understood it, which began following the legislation of Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty and Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation. In this case it was held that the Supreme Court could strike down Knesset legislation which is inconsistent with these Basic Laws.
  • CA 243/83 The Jerusalem Municipality v. Gordon, 39(1) P.D 113: In this judgment Barak reformed key aspects of Israeli tort law.
  • HC 3269/95 Katz v. Regional Rabbinical Court, 50(4) P.D 590: In this judgment Barak held, sitting as Deputy President to Meir Shamgar, that the laws pertaining to property disputes arising from divorce are not caused by the act of marriage and thus are not to be regarded as matters of marriage. Rather, they derive from an agreement between the parties and are an aspect of the freedom of association. This case established that the Israeli Rabbinical courts must apply the doctrine of joint matrimonial property, a doctrine based in Israeli common law rather than the Halakha (Jewish religious law).
  • CA 4628/93 State of Israel v. Guardian of Housing and Initiatives (1991) Ltd., 49(2) P.D 265: In this judgment Barak proposed a new approach to contract construction, holding that a lot of weight should be given to the circumstances which led to the formation of the contract. Some aspects of Barak's views in this regard remain controversial, but his general approach to contract construction is today accepted by the Supreme Court.
  • CA 165/82 Kibbutz Hatzor v Assessing Officer, 39(2) P.D 70: This judgment was a turning point in the interpretation of tax law in Israel, in establishing that a purposive approach was generally preferred to textualism in determining the meaning of the law.
  • FH 40/80 Koenig v. Cohen, 36(3) P.D 701: In this judgment Barak, in the minority, expounded upon his approach to interpreting legislation. Today this approach has become an acceptable approach to statutory interpretation.
  • CA 817/79, Kossoy v. Y.L. Feuchtwanger Bank Ltd., 38(3) P.D 253: In this judgment Barak imposed a duty of fairness upon one who controls a company, holding that one who controls a company cannot sell his shares of the company when as a consequence of doing so the company, and thus its shareholders, would be harmed.

South Africa v. Israel

On January 11, 2024, the Israeli government appointed Barak as an ad hoc judge to serve on the International Court of Justice case South Africa v. Israel, brought against Israel by South Africa on charges of genocide. In this role, Barak voted against several of the provisional measures the ICJ imposed on Israel, such as preventing acts of genocide, protecting evidence, and facilitating humanitarian aid, suggesting he found insufficient basis in the evidence for these specific requirements.

On June 5, 2024, Barak resigned from his role as an ad hoc judge, citing personal reasons.


Views and opinions

Barak championed a proactive judiciary that has interpreted Israel's Basic Law as its constitution, and challenged Knesset laws on that basis. Barak's legal philosophy starts with the belief that "the world is filled with law". This idea portrays law as an all-encompassing framework of human affairs from which no action can ever be immune: Whatever the law does not prohibit, it permits; either way, the law always has its say, on everything. Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, the new President of the Court, Judge Dorit Beinisch, said at his farewell ceremony: "At the heart of the development of the law of Israel stands Aharon Barak. He opened new horizons. The law as it stands after his differs in its purpose from the era which preceded him. Since his first year in the Supreme Court his rulings were groundbreaking, since '78 and until today he set the central legal norms that this court granted Israeli society."

On the issue of the substantial expansion of the right of standing and the test of reasonableness of an administrative decision (which grants the courts the power to overrule an administrative decision if the judge is convinced that it does not "stand bounds of reasonableness"), Amnon Rubinstein wrote:" Thus a situation has arisen whereby the Supreme Court may convene and decide on every conceivable issue. In addition to that the unreasonableness of an administrative decision will be grounds for judicial intervention. This was a total revolution in the judicial thinking which characterized the Supreme Court of previous generations, and this has given it the reputation of the most activist court in the world, causing both admiration and criticism. In practice, in many respects the Supreme Court under Barak has become an alternate government."

Barak is a secular Jew but believes in compromise with the religious sector, and state support for religion. His judgments on the interaction between religion and state have led to hostility towards him by some in the religious public. Religious Jews from all sectors of society (including both Haredim and Religious Zionists) held a mass protest against the Supreme Court under his presidency, after the Supreme Court ruled that in cases of divorce the Israeli religious courts of law are required to decide property disputes according to the law of the Knesset rather than according to the Halakha.

Criticism

Among critics of Barak's judicial activism are former President of the Supreme Court of Israel Moshe Landau, Ruth Gavison, and Richard Posner. Posner, a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and authority on jurisprudence, criticised Barak's decision to interpret the Basic Laws as Israel's constitution, stating that "only in Israel ... do judges confer the power of abstract review on themselves, without benefit of a constitutional or legislative provision." He also argues that Barak's idea of the courts enforcing a set of rights which they find in "substantive" democracy, rather than merely democratic political rights, actually involves a curtailing of democracy and results in a "hyperactive judiciary." Furthermore, he claims that Barak's approach to the interpretation of statutes involves, in practice, interpretation in the context of the judge's own personal ideal system, and "opens up a vast realm for discretionary judgment", rather than providing for an objective interpretation of the statute. He is also critical of Barak's view of the separation of powers, arguing that, in effect, it is that "judicial power is unlimited and the legislature cannot remove judges." He also asserts that Barak fails to apply his own judicial philosophy in practice at times. Nevertheless, Posner said that "Barak himself is by all accounts brilliant, as well as austere and high-minded – Israel's Cato", and that while he would not regard Barak's judicial approach as a desirable universal model, it may be suited to Israel's specific circumstances. He also suggested that if there were a Nobel prize for law, Barak would likely be among its early recipients.

His judgments on matters of security have been subject to criticism by some on both the left and the right.

Key legal doctrines

Awards and recognition

  • In 1975, Barak was awarded the Israel Prize, in jurisprudence.
  • In 1987, he was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  • In 2003, he received Honorary Degrees from Brandeis University.
  • In 2006, he received the Justice Prize of the Peter Gruber Foundation for "outstanding courage and principle who has devoted his life to the promotion of justice and the just rule of law."
  • In 2007, he received Honorary Degrees from Columbia University.

Published works

See also

References

  1. "Aharon Barak – President of the Supreme Court". Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  2. Avnery, Uri (18 April 2015). "There Are Still Judges…". Gush Shalom. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  3. "Aharon Barak – Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  4. Carter, James Earl (2006). Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-7432-8502-5.
  5. Neuer, Hillel (1998). "Aharon Barak's Revolution". Azure. Winter 5758 (3). Retrieved 24 January 2011.mirror Archived 1 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  6. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 29 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  7. "השופט כבוחן כליות ולב". Makorrishon.co.il. Archived from the original on 13 March 2007. Retrieved 22 September 2010.
  8. פרוטוקול:208 – חוקה בהסכמה רחבה (in Hebrew). Huka.gov.il. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 22 September 2010.
  9. Berman, Lazar; Horowitz, Michael; Sharon, Jeremy (7 January 2024). "Israel tasks ex-Supreme Court chief Aharon Barak to serve at Hague genocide hearings". Retrieved 10 January 2024.
  10. "Separate opinion of Judge ad hoc Barak | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE". www.icj-cij.org. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  11. "Aharon Barak steps down from role as ad hoc judge at ICJ for personal reasons". Times of Israel. 5 June 2024.
  12. Aharon Barak's revolution Archived 1 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ^ Posner, Richard A. (23 April 2007). "Enlightened Despot". The New Republic. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  14. "ערוץ 7 - רשת תקשורת ישראלית". Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 29 October 2009.
  15. "אצלי זה פוליטי, נקודה – מוסף הארץ – הארץ". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 22 September 2010.
  16. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 1 November 2009. Retrieved 29 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  17. Aharon Barak on the Role of Proportionality Archived 26 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine (Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture 2009)
  18. "Israel Prize Official Site – Recipients in 1975 (in Hebrew)".
  19. "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter B" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
  20. "2006 Gruber Justice Prize Press Release". Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  21. Kahn, Ronald (September 2006). "PURPOSIVE INTERPRETATION IN LAW, by Aharon Barak". Law and Politics Book Review. 16 (9): 708–738. Archived from the original on 6 December 2010.

External links

Attorneys General of Israel Israel
Presidents of the Supreme Court of Israel Israel
Historic
Categories: