Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/1361 Leuschneria: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:15, 15 May 2015 editDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,787 edits →1361 Leuschneria: another← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:47, 1 May 2023 edit undoBruce1ee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers267,012 editsm fixed lint errors – stripped tags 
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''. ] (]) 17:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}}



:{{la|1361 Leuschneria}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|1361 Leuschneria}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|1361 Leuschneria}}) :({{Find sources AFD|1361 Leuschneria}})
DOesn't meet ] or ]. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to ] per NASTRO. ] (]) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC) ] (]) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC) DOesn't meet ] or ]. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to ] per NASTRO. ] (]) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC) ] (]) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 23:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 23:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Unsure'''. The main subject of two old orbital studies , used as one of two examples in a paper about a method for calculating orbits , and mentioned more recently as a candidate for a certain orbital resonance (but found not to be in that resonance) . This last reference also cites a book chapter by Williams (1979) where its candidacy for the resonance was first proposed. Is it enough? —] (]) 07:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC) *'''Unsure'''. The main subject of two old orbital studies , used as one of two examples in a paper about a method for calculating orbits , and mentioned more recently as a candidate for a certain orbital resonance (but found not to be in that resonance) . This last reference also cites a book chapter by Williams (1979) where its candidacy for the resonance was first proposed. Is it enough? —] (]) 07:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids as the the main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected. It would be better if borderline asteroids were actually dealt with by the Astro project. -- ] (]) 11:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
:{|cellpadding=0 style="border: 1px solid #A3A3A3; background-color: #FFFFFF" align=left width=auto
|<span style="font-size:89%;">'''] {{color|#FF7216|to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><span style="font-size:84%;">Please add new comments below this notice. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 08:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)</span><!-- from Template:Relist -->
|}{{-}}<!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 19:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><!-- Please add new comments below this line --></div>
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 11:47, 1 May 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 17:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

1361 Leuschneria

1361 Leuschneria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DOesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America 23:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Unsure. The main subject of two old orbital studies , used as one of two examples in a paper about a method for calculating orbits , and mentioned more recently as a candidate for a certain orbital resonance (but found not to be in that resonance) . This last reference also cites a book chapter by Williams (1979) where its candidacy for the resonance was first proposed. Is it enough? —David Eppstein (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: WP:NASTRO is merely a guideline and should not be used to remove borderline asteroids as the the main-belt asteroid problem was created by bots and should not be over corrected. It would be better if borderline asteroids were actually dealt with by the Astro project. -- Kheider (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. North America 08:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.