| Revision as of 01:50, 28 July 2006 editSynergy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,794 editsm KV← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:55, 17 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,646 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (5x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (391 intermediate revisions by 63 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Welcome & Disclaimer (please read)== | |||
| == lost virginity == | |||
| This is the talk page for ]. Please to the '''bottom''' of the page. Please note that I reserve the right to blank messages on this page for any reason, but most especially will certainly do so for any ] or for communication with a third party on my talk page. If you have something to say to someone, use their talk page, not mine. If you do not agree with this policy, please don't post on this page, but rather contact me on the talk page of the article involved. Thank you. —] 13:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Congratulations on your first userpage vandalism! ] 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Archives== | |||
| *] | |||
| Also here are your current ] awards, if you want them: | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <!--]''', and is entitled to display this '''Yeoman Editor Badge''']]--> | |||
| <!--]''', and is entitled to display this '''Misplaced Pages Vest Pocket Book''']]--> | |||
| *Wow, you've . At this rate you'll be Tutnun in a few months. ] 00:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] pages - help! == | |||
| I've got a bozo trying to start a revert war on ]. Could you help? ---] 20:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You are not using the article discussion page when you change pages in a manner as you just did with ]. When you do this without engaging other editors interested in the article you are missing the opportunity to explain, education and discuss. You did not engage in the ] and so that opportunity to discuss and understand was missed. How are we going to resolve this? The whole thing is going to start up again if we don't behave more kindly to one another, even if we don't agree. ]] 15:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks :-) ---] 21:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Greetings, Hanuman Das. In the interests of full disclosure, I want to draw your attention to my recent comments on the ] of the Starwood ]. I have seen and respected your work in the past, but I'm troubled by one particular edit of yours. | |||
| ::Ok well now I'm talking to you, Hanuman. I wanted to make both of you aware that this is also not in keeping with good faith. His remarks are uneeded. ] 02:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Similarly, I've had concerns about ] in the past, but in this case it's starting to look like zie may be in the right, at least partially. | |||
| :Please jump into the discussion; it'll put you in a better position to defend your edits against charges of linkspamming. | |||
| ⚫ | :] 15:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Whatever. It's a good idea to have a bit of a thick skin on WP. There will always be occasional mistakes made by people. It's really only when it takes on a pattern that I pay much attention to it. —] 02:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I think there are some things really wrong with the Neem Karoli Baba page here. -- Abhinav | |||
| :Could you be a bit more specific? Clearly it could use expansion, but I don't ''think'' there is anything terribly "wrong" with it at the moment. —] 19:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please Go == | |||
| == |
== Thank you! == | ||
| You always seem a cut above the other endorsers, and it seemed like we could be friends for a while there. Yes, it does give me ulcers and untold distress. But (I disclose to you alone) I am a UC at Berkeley graduate and the standing up for principle stuff I can't seem to let go of that. I believe that Rosencomet and 999 are deeply in the wrong and misinformed. So what are my choices, given my background? It's a failing of mine but there it is. I truly am not antipagan (even if I don't know what that is) but, for heaven's sakes, I listen to Art Bell et al every night -- which seems to me beyond pagamism. A few nights ago I learned that the new Canadian Prime Minister's greatest fear is that the US will get into a war with extra-terrestials. (Even Art Bell seemed nonplussed about that.) Oh, be my friend. I can't negotiate all alone through this Misplaced Pages world. Could we agree to disagree on some things and still like and enjoy each other? Sincerely, ]] 04:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *] | |||
| == Illuminates == | |||
| Does this qualify for AfD? ] 04:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| "Self-published" means here that the only source of info is the illuminates themselves, without independent third-party evaluation. Since this bullshit is mosty harmless, I will not lose my sleep over it. Good luck to defend them. I will not interfere any more. `'] 01:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| ⚫ | == Starwood == | ||
| {{Hindu Links}} | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| Pigman has asked a question of you on the Starwood mediation page... Thought you'd want to know... ] (]) 17:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| == re: Your comment to me == | |||
| You wanna report this guy on the 3RR or do you want me to? ] 02:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I don't think that part of the mediation is really being addressed, but that is up to Salix Alba to decide. I think his intention was to address ALL of the linking, including internal linking, and thus far I believe only some external links to the web site have been removed. Either way, I am advising Pigman to open the RfC to get the larger community involved. --<span style="color: #3300FF;">] </span> 04:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Not worth responding== | |||
| I am merging the Cape Sorrell waverider bouy article with Cape Sorell immediately, and you do what you like. The arguments (googling, importance, etc etc) are not worth responding to, as it wastes yours and their time - there was good reasoning to keep it, but honestly, wikipedia shoots itself in the foot when the amount of time is spent on the conflict stuff, and to be honest I used to come across so many articles in random article searching that cape sorell is a worthy article compared to stuff I used to find! In good faith, and if you think its worth putting up, go off and do a full days random article searching to see what I mean :) Best Wishes ] 03:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Recent edits == | |||
| ::BTW thanks for the cleanup :) !! ] 05:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Heheh, indeed. Actually in decciding not defend the delete, I realise that I wanted to have an art on extreme weather on the west coast of tasmania - and that cape sorell, mount read and lake margaret are a sort of locations of triangulation of the 40 degree south extreme weather - an article that now comes cleaner from having to think about it all! So in a strange way, thanks! ] 05:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Is there a reason for your flurry of recent edits like ? There is a place to seek remedies for sockpuppetry, and article talk pages are not it. Adding unsigned taglines to someone's else's contributions, socks or not, is just disruptive and incivil. --<span style="color: #3300FF;">] </span> 15:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : So my choice of title for this lot of talk is indeed ironic, there's heaps worth responding to! There is nothing in wikipedia (as far as I can tell so far) on waverider bouys, so...] 05:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == May we discuss an issue == | |||
| ::Having looked very closely at Clusty and much less at Google, and the importance of waverider bouys in Australian waters, I will be restoring the article at some later time, and will make sure that it has its notability as well as further links and points, that I am sure will pass the test of this mornings exercise. When? that's another story! Best Wishes ] 07:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Hanuman Das. There are some issues that I would like to discuss with you regarding some of your recent edits. Are you amenable to a discussion? --] <span style="color: blue;"><sup>]</sup></span> 23:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the encouragement, the problem is that Waverider is a TM of a dutch firm, and our firends the US citizens of the world have other uses for the term - so a large DAB page first I suspect :) ] 13:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| * '''Thank you, Hanuman Das'''. I am learning. Cannot help but notice a lack of articles on individual yoga practices in Wiki, let alone their integration into effective practice routines. Are verifiable articles on practices welcome? Also, can the Yogani article be placed on my user page with links intact? Can others edit that? Nothing to hide here ... no hidden agenda. In AYP, what you see is what you get. The guru is in you. ] 21:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Basically I used ]. | |||
| Apologies for the misunderstanding earlier in the Tantra entry, I hadn't noticed your suggestion until now. ] 02:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Which is just to say it was my own personal assessment. | |||
| Will do. Thanks for the help. ] 02:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Personally, I think it is really close to an A and probably is, and I wish I could be more specific but can't think of any specific suggestions (right now) | |||
| * Thanks much. Will do on requesting move of the Yogani page, and testing a few articles on practice. The goal here is to bring powerful easy-to-do yoga practices into the public domain in a well-integrated fashion, and perhaps AYP and Wiki can overlap on that. Will keep you posted. ] 14:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] 02:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == DaVinci == | |||
| ==] case== | |||
| Nope. Fiction books don't list a bibliography. Its taken from , and its not copyrighted. Still looking for something to AfD this. ] 05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :So far, the only thing I know that works on AfD is ] but this isnt a guideline or policy. You'd have to have a very, very good argument for it to be deleted. ] 05:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::As you may or may not know, the page is now prodded. If someone takes it down with no comment, list it for AfD and let me know. By the way, I own the book so I know for fact its not listed in the book itself, just the web site. ] 05:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| It was a JOKE, get it? Or do I have to Wikilink it, ]. No policy violations were committed, there was no "abuse, libel, or ban evasion." Stop harassing me. —] 20:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| ::You seem to have notions about how Misplaced Pages works, and about Misplaced Pages policies that do not correspond to my own beliefs. My suggestion to you is to either a) wait things out, or b) acknowledge that you threatened to use sockpuppets in a disruptive way and state for the record that you will not use sockpuppets. Of course there is always option c) which is to ignore the advice that is given to you. Sincerely, --] <span style="color: blue;"><sup>]</sup></span> 20:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Also, removing discussions that I am having with you while you are attempting to resolve your sockpuppetry case do not help your cause. --] <span style="color: blue;"><sup>]</sup></span> 20:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, thanks for the barnstar! -] (]) 14:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Oops. Forgot to thank you myself! ] 14:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Gee wiz. It would help if I thanked you. Thanks for the barnstar! :D ] 14:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have no cause, and I am no longer interested in communication with you. You have no sense of humor. Please don't post on my talk page again. Thanks. —] 20:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Statement on Onslaught of Challenges == | |||
| There are currently challenges made by the same three people, all of whom will recieve this message, on ], ], ], ], ], and ] all at the same time. Some people actually work for a living and have a life outside of Misplaced Pages. If you want to make challenges, you are free to do so. But when you know that they are all against the same person, have a little bit of courtesy and challenge them one or two at a time, and allow appropriate time for someone to actually do something about it. I am not a superhuman, and ]ing me with all these challenges at once is unrealistic and shady. Try to have some patience and actually make it possible for me to work with you rather than trying to send me on the defensive and effectively make me leave Misplaced Pages. If this continues, I will have to make this an issue through RfC, Administrator's noticeboard, or Arbitration Committee. Try to use your time actually find sources to contradict mine if you feel that you have too much free time to wait around for me to be able to act on any given article. | |||
| ](]) 16:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == KV == | |||
| He filed a joint complaint about us on ]. Thought you should know. ] 01:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:55, 17 March 2023
lost virginity
Congratulations on your first userpage vandalism! Herostratus 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Also here are your current WP:SERVICE awards, if you want them:
- Wow, you've gotten busy. At this rate you'll be Tutnun in a few months. Herostratus 00:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Starwood Festival pages - help!
You are not using the article discussion page when you change pages in a manner as you just did with Andrew Cohen. When you do this without engaging other editors interested in the article you are missing the opportunity to explain, education and discuss. You did not engage in the Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-03 Starwood Festival and so that opportunity to discuss and understand was missed. How are we going to resolve this? The whole thing is going to start up again if we don't behave more kindly to one another, even if we don't agree. Mattisse(talk) 15:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Greetings, Hanuman Das. In the interests of full disclosure, I want to draw your attention to my recent comments on the talk page of the Starwood discussion. I have seen and respected your work in the past, but I'm troubled by one particular edit of yours.
- Similarly, I've had concerns about Mattisse in the past, but in this case it's starting to look like zie may be in the right, at least partially.
- Please jump into the discussion; it'll put you in a better position to defend your edits against charges of linkspamming.
- Septegram 15:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Neem Karoli Baba
I think there are some things really wrong with the Neem Karoli Baba page here. -- Abhinav
- Could you be a bit more specific? Clearly it could use expansion, but I don't think there is anything terribly "wrong" with it at the moment. —Hanuman Das 19:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
You always seem a cut above the other endorsers, and it seemed like we could be friends for a while there. Yes, it does give me ulcers and untold distress. But (I disclose to you alone) I am a UC at Berkeley graduate and the standing up for principle stuff I can't seem to let go of that. I believe that Rosencomet and 999 are deeply in the wrong and misinformed. So what are my choices, given my background? It's a failing of mine but there it is. I truly am not antipagan (even if I don't know what that is) but, for heaven's sakes, I listen to Art Bell et al every night -- which seems to me beyond pagamism. A few nights ago I learned that the new Canadian Prime Minister's greatest fear is that the US will get into a war with extra-terrestials. (Even Art Bell seemed nonplussed about that.) Oh, be my friend. I can't negotiate all alone through this Misplaced Pages world. Could we agree to disagree on some things and still like and enjoy each other? Sincerely, Mattisse(talk) 04:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Illuminates
"Self-published" means here that the only source of info is the illuminates themselves, without independent third-party evaluation. Since this bullshit is mosty harmless, I will not lose my sleep over it. Good luck to defend them. I will not interfere any more. `'mikkanarxi 01:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Starwood
Pigman has asked a question of you on the Starwood mediation page... Thought you'd want to know... Ekajati (yakity-yak) 17:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
re: Your comment to me
I don't think that part of the mediation is really being addressed, but that is up to Salix Alba to decide. I think his intention was to address ALL of the linking, including internal linking, and thus far I believe only some external links to the web site have been removed. Either way, I am advising Pigman to open the RfC to get the larger community involved. --Ars Scriptor 04:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Recent edits
Is there a reason for your flurry of recent edits like this? There is a place to seek remedies for sockpuppetry, and article talk pages are not it. Adding unsigned taglines to someone's else's contributions, socks or not, is just disruptive and incivil. --Ars Scriptor 15:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
May we discuss an issue
Hi Hanuman Das. There are some issues that I would like to discuss with you regarding some of your recent edits. Are you amenable to a discussion? --BostonMA 23:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Nath
Basically I used Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Hinduism/Assessment#Quality_scale.
Which is just to say it was my own personal assessment.
Personally, I think it is really close to an A and probably is, and I wish I could be more specific but can't think of any specific suggestions (right now)
TheRingess 02:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
It was a JOKE, get it? Or do I have to Wikilink it, joke. No policy violations were committed, there was no "abuse, libel, or ban evasion." Stop harassing me. —Hanuman Das 20:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- You seem to have notions about how Misplaced Pages works, and about Misplaced Pages policies that do not correspond to my own beliefs. My suggestion to you is to either a) wait things out, or b) acknowledge that you threatened to use sockpuppets in a disruptive way and state for the record that you will not use sockpuppets. Of course there is always option c) which is to ignore the advice that is given to you. Sincerely, --BostonMA 20:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Also, removing discussions that I am having with you while you are attempting to resolve your sockpuppetry case do not help your cause. --BostonMA 20:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have no cause, and I am no longer interested in communication with you. You have no sense of humor. Please don't post on my talk page again. Thanks. —Hanuman Das 20:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)