| Revision as of 16:38, 20 May 2015 editMilowent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,661 edits comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:30, 13 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''redirect'''.There is a clear consensus to redirect. While there is some support for delete and redirect, there has been no policy-based rationale provided for why deletion is necessary and for why a simple redirect would not suffice. ] (]) 18:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}} | |||
| :{{la|1482 Sebastiana}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|1482 Sebastiana}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Delete''' and redirect title to ]. The subject fails ] and ].- ]] 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' and redirect title to ]. The subject fails ] and ].- ]] 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Only delete or redirect''' (assuming not notable) if ] rewrites ] to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that ] be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that ] should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | *'''Only delete or redirect''' (assuming not notable) if ] rewrites ] to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that ] be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that ] should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| **{{ping|Milowent}} please read and follow ]. This kind of AfD contribution is unconstructive and unhelpful. —] (]) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' and redirect per ]. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. <b>] ]</b> 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *'''Weak redirect'''. Other than a 24-body lightcurve study there's also a study of its polar angle, more specific to this object which shows it to have an unusual spin axis. But the details in the second study are still quite meager, so I don't think there's enough coverage to make an article. —] (]) 23:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 17:30, 13 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect.There is a clear consensus to redirect. While there is some support for delete and redirect, there has been no policy-based rationale provided for why deletion is necessary and for why a simple redirect would not suffice. Rlendog (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
1482 Sebastiana
- 1482 Sebastiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect title to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. The subject fails WP:NASTCRIT and WP:GNG.- MrX 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Only delete or redirect (assuming not notable) if Boleyn rewrites List of minor planets: 1001–2000 to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that Boleyn be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Please opine whether you agree that Boleyn should be deleted from Misplaced Pages.--Milowent • 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Milowent: please read and follow Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks. This kind of AfD contribution is unconstructive and unhelpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect per WP:NASTRO. Don't see how a one-sentence article is useful in any way. OhNoitsJamie 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak redirect. Other than a 24-body lightcurve study there's also a study of its polar angle, more specific to this object which shows it to have an unusual spin axis. But the details in the second study are still quite meager, so I don't think there's enough coverage to make an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.