Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Workshop: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Lightbreather Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:37, 25 May 2015 editCa2james (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,294 edits Ca2james' section: I see that I misinterpreted the notice← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:50, 8 August 2020 edit undoNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits blankingTag: Replaced 
(105 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOINDEX__
{{Casenav}}
{{ombox |image=] |text= This page has been ]. }}
{{tmbox
| type = content
| image = ]
| text = <center><big>'''Comments on this page are to be sectioned, not threaded. With the exception of arbitrators and clerks, all editors must create a section for their statement and <u>comment only in their own section</u>.</big></center>
}}


{{ivmbox|<big>''']'''</big>

Because of the unusual number of participants with i-bans in this case, the consensus of the Arbitration Committee is that:

1. All i-bans and associated restrictions are suspended for participation on the ]. This suspension extends solely and exclusively to the /Evidence page but some tolerance will be given on the ] to ''link'' to material on the /Evidence page.

2. For simplicity, and for the purposes of this case only, one-way i-bans are regarded as two-way i-bans.

3. Threaded interactions of any description between participants are prohibited on both the /Evidence and the /Evidence talk pages.

4. Similar arrangements will apply to ] and the ].<p>
&nbsp;] <sup>]</sup> 11:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
}}

== Ca2james' section ==

I'm curious about how comments on the workshop page will work what with threaded discussion being prohibited. If an editor wishes to comment on a proposed item, does that editor create their own "Comment by editor" section somewhere or should they do something else? Thanks for the clarification. ] (]) 02:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
:Sectioned comments are enforced on this workshop talk page, not the workshop page proper. Thanks, --''']''' (] / ] / ]) 02:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
::I see now that I misinterpreted the notice regarding sectioned comments. My apologies, and thank you for your speedy reply and your patience. ] (]) 06:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:50, 8 August 2020

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.