| Revision as of 22:38, 26 May 2015 view sourceWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits Warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Talk:John Forbes Nash, Jr.. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:02, 4 December 2016 view source Hex (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators25,289 edits This user is not coming back. Redirecting to user page. | ||
| (331 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==DYK for Christ Church, Newton== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that on August 15, 1774, ''']''' ''(pictured)'', an ] church in ], was granted a ] by ] ] on behalf of Britain's ]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Christ Church, Newton|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Christ Church, Newton|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], , )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> — ] (]) 09:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : Nice article, thank you. I would like to improve a church article, ], ideas welcome, - more history from German needs to be included but I lack the terms in English, | |||
| == Establishment and Incorporation == | |||
| Regarding your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Newton,_New_Jersey&diff=661307244&oldid=661292530, I hope you can see that the administrative process of "incorporation" is distinct from when a populated place actually was founded and it is not useful to have one category set used for two different purposes in an indiscriminate manner. I would not be against have ] etc but ] (if you feel strongly about this then it would be no bad thing to revisit the question). As regards ], quoting the article, we have "Newton was first settled ... sometime before 1751", so assuming that the "sometime" in question was not more than 50 years then it would be correct to categorize Newton, New Jersey in ]. Finally, most populated places in the ] categorize by the date that the settlement actually was founded and so I don't really think it correct to say that I am "a user pushing a one-man consensus" as loads of other people have added articles to the category set on the basis of the date of actual foundation. I have played a leading role in establishing some guidelines for the use of the ] and if you disagree with what is written there then why not set out your ideas at ]? ] (]) 13:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| * Sorry, {{u|Greenshed}} I'm not really that interested in your one-man crusade or a 9-year old discussion that decides nothing. All of NJ's municipalities, and many other states, are categorized this way without complaint. as for your precious category, the advisory of " or otherwise came into existence" in its inclusion statement is overly broad....FYI: 11 April 1864 is the date the Town of Newton was established, legally-came into existence, and the inclusion of Newton in 1864 is not unwarranted. If you want to play a game of semantics vis-a-vis established, incorporated, etc. don't waste my time or start edit-warring over this pedantic nonsense.--] (]) 14:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == May 2015 == | |||
| ] Please ] other editors, as you did on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. ''You are welcome to discuss article concerns and improvements while adhering to NPA. Continuing to misuse the article talk page for personal attacks, however, is not appropriate or acceptable.''<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 22:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 4 December 2016
Redirect to: