Misplaced Pages

Nix (moon): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:36, 4 June 2015 editJorisvS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers46,766 editsm top← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:47, 10 October 2024 edit undoMolinari (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,011 editsm Discovery: "accompanied with" -> "accompanied by" 
(340 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Moon of Pluto}}
{{About-distinguish2|the moon of Pluto|the asteroid ]}}
{{good article}}
{{use dmy dates|date=July 2023}}
{{Infobox planet {{Infobox planet
| name = Nix | name = Nix
| image = ] | image = Nix best view.jpg
| caption = Discovery images of Nix (and Hydra) | caption = Enhanced color image of Nix, taken by '']''
| discovery_ref = <ref name="Nomenclature">{{cite web|title=Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers|website=Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature|publisher=International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN)|url=https://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Page/Planets|access-date=17 May 2021}}</ref>
| discovery = yes
| discoverer = ] et al.{{efn|The full list of discoverers includes ], ], M. J. Mutchler, A. J. Steffl, ], W. J. Merline, J. R. Spencer, E. F. Young, and L. A. Young.<ref name="Nomenclature"/>}}
| discoverer = ]<br>Pluto Companion Search Team
| discovered = June 2005 | discovered = 15 May 2005
| alt_names = ({{val|134340}}) Pluto II<ref name="Nomenclature">{{cite web | alt_names = S/2005 P 2
| mpc_name = Pluto II<ref name="Nomenclature" />
|date=2009-11-09
| named_after = ]
|title=Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature
| pronounced = {{IPAc-en|ˈ|n|ɪ|k|s}}
|publisher=IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN)
| adjectives = Nictian ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|n|ɪ|k|t|i|ən}})
|author=Jennifer Blue
| orbit_ref = <ref name="ShowalterHamilton2015">{{cite journal|last1=Showalter|first1=M. R.|author1-link=Mark R. Showalter|last2=Hamilton|first2=D. P.|title=Resonant interactions and chaotic rotation of Pluto's small moons|journal=Nature|volume=522|issue=7554|date=3 June 2015|pages=45–49|doi=10.1038/nature14469|pmid=26040889|bibcode=2015Natur.522...45S|s2cid=205243819}}</ref>
|url=http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/append7.html#DwarfPlanets
| semimajor = {{val|48694|3|u=km}}
|accessdate=2010-08-30}}</ref>
| eccentricity = {{val|0.002036|0.000050}}
| named_after = ]
| pronounced = {{IPAc-en|ˈ|n|ɪ|k|s}} | period = {{val|24.85463|0.00003|u=d}}
| inclination = {{val|0.133|0.008|u=°}} ({{val|122.53|0.008|u=°}} to Pluto's orbit)
| note = yes
| satellite_of = ]
| adjectives = Nictian
| dimensions = {{nowrap|1=49.8 × 33.2 × 31.1 km}}<ref name="phasecurves" /><br/>(] of 37 km)
| orbit_ref = <ref name="Buie_2006" />
| volume =
| semimajor = {{val|48708|u=km}}
| mass = {{val|2.60|0.52|e=16|u=kg}}<ref name="Porter2023"/>{{rp|page=10}}
| eccentricity = {{val|0.0030}}
| period = {{val|24.856|0.001|u=d}} | density = {{val|1.031|0.204|u=g/cm3}}<ref name="Porter2023"/>{{rp|page=10}}
| surface_grav = ≈&thinsp;{{Gr|2.6e-5|24.9|4}}&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup> at longest axis<br/>to ≈&thinsp;{{Gr|2.6e-5|15.55|4}}&nbsp;m/s<sup>2</sup> at poles
| inclination = {{val|0.195|u=°}}
| escape_velocity = ≈&thinsp;{{V2|2.6e-5|24.9|4}}&nbsp;km/s at longest axis<br/>to ≈&thinsp;{{V2|2.6e-5|15.55|4}}&nbsp;km/s at poles<!-- V2 template uses mass in terms of e+21 kg, radius in terms of km, and number of decimal places -->
| satellite_of = ]
| rotation = {{val|1.829|0.009|u=d}}<ref name="Weaver2016"/>{{rp|page=3}}
| physical_characteristics = yes
chaotic<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-hubble-finds-pluto-s-moons-tumbling-in-absolute-chaos|title=NASA's Hubble Finds Pluto's Moons Tumbling in Absolute Chaos|first=Karen|last=Northon|date=3 June 2015}}</ref> (decreased by 10% between discovery and flyby)<ref name=Lakdawalla1110>{{cite web|url=http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2015/dps15-1110-small-moons.html|title=DPS 2015: Pluto's small moons Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra |website=www.planetary.org|last1=Lakdawalla|first1=Emily|access-date=2015-11-14|archive-date=2017-09-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170927202313/http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2015/dps15-1110-small-moons.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>
| mean_radius = 23–68 km<ref name="Weaver2006">
| axial_tilt = {{val|123|10|u=°}} (to Pluto–Charon orbit)<ref name="Weaver2016-supp"/>{{rp|page=11}}<br/>{{val|48|10|u=°}} (to ]){{efn|name=axial-tilt|Given Nix's rotational north pole ] of +42°,<ref name="Weaver2016"/>{{rp|page=5}} subtracting this angle from the north ] of +90° gives the inclination with respect to the ]: ''i'' {{=}} +90° – (+42°) {{=}} +48°.}}
{{cite journal | author = H. A. Weaver |display-authors = 4 |author2 = S. A. Stern |author3 = M. J. Mutchler |author4 = A. J. Steffl|author5 = M. W. Buie |author6 = W. J. Merline|author7 = J. R. Spencer |author8 = E. F. Young |author9 = L. A. Young |last-author-amp = yes |date=23 February 2006 | title = Discovery of two new satellites of Pluto | journal = Nature | volume = 439| issue = 7079 | pages = 943–945| doi = 10.1038/nature04547 | arxiv = astro-ph/0601018 | pmid = 16495991|bibcode = 2006Natur.439..943W }}</ref>
| right_asc_north_pole = {{val|350|10|u=°}}<ref name="Weaver2016"/>{{rp|page=3}}
| mass = {{val|5|e=16}} to {{val|2|e=18|u=kg}}<ref>Based on the range of diameters from Buie et al. (2006), and densities ranging from 1 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (ice) to 2 g/cm<sup>3</sup> (Pluto).</ref>
| declination = {{val|42|10|u=°}}<ref name="Weaver2016"/>{{rp|page=3}}
| density = (unknown)
| albedo = {{val|0.56|0.05}}<ref name="Weaver2016"/>{{rp|page=3}}
| single_temperature = 33–55 ]
| magnitude = 23.38–23.7 (measured)<ref name="Stern06b" />
| rotation = chaotic<ref>http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-hubble-finds-pluto-s-moons-tumbling-in-absolute-chaos</ref>
| abs_magnitude = 8.28<ref name="Weaver2016"/>{{rp|page=2}}
| axial_tilt = varies
| single_temperature =
| albedo = 0.04–0.35 (assumed)<ref name="Stern06b" />
| magnitude = 23.38–23.7 (measured)<ref name="Stern06b" />
}} }}


'''Nix''' is a ]. It was discovered along with ] in June 2005, and is to be imaged along with Pluto and Charon by the '']'' mission in July 2015. <ref Name=UniverseToday>{{cite web|title=Pluto’s Moon Nix|author=Cain, Fraser | date=2008| url=http://www.universetoday.com/13905/plutos-moon-nix/}}</ref> Of the four small Plutonian moons, ''New Horizons'' is expected to get the best pictures of Nix. '''Nix''' is a ], with a diameter of {{convert|49.8|km|mi|abbr=on}} across its longest dimension.<ref name="phasecurves" /> It was discovered along with Pluto's outermost moon ] on 15 May 2005 by astronomers using the ],<ref name="Nomenclature" /> and was named after ], the Greek goddess of the night.<ref name="plutomoons" /> Nix is the third moon of ] by distance, orbiting between the moons ] and ].<ref name="scimag000" />

Nix was imaged along with ] and its other moons by the '']'' spacecraft as it flew by the Pluto system in July&nbsp;2015.<ref name="UniverseToday">{{cite web|title=Pluto's Moon Nix|author=Cain, Fraser|date=3 September 2015|url=http://www.universetoday.com/13905/plutos-moon-nix/|website=www.universetoday.com|access-date=26 February 2019}}</ref> Images from the ''New Horizons'' spacecraft reveal a large reddish area on Nix that is likely an ].<ref name="SimonPort2015" />


== Discovery == == Discovery ==
]
Nix was found by the ] Pluto Companion Search Team, composed of Hal A. Weaver, ], Max J. Mutchler, Andrew J. Steffl, ], William J. Merline, John R. Spencer, Eliot F. Young, and Leslie A. Young. The discovery images were taken on May 15, 2005, and May 18, 2005; Nix and Hydra were independently discovered by Max J. Mutchler on June 15, 2005, and Andrew J. Steffl on August 15, 2005. The discoveries were announced on October 31, 2005, after confirmation by ] from 2002. They were ] '''S/2005 P 1''' (Hydra) and '''S/2005 P 2''' (Nix).<ref name="IAUC8625"> describing the discovery</ref><ref name="IAUC8723" />


Nix was independently discovered by Max Mutchler and Andrew Steffl, members of the Pluto Companion Search Team, using the ].<ref name="plutomoons">{{Cite web|title = Pluto and Its Moons: Charon, Nix and Hydra|url = https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/plutos_moons.html|website = www.nasa.gov|publisher = NASA|date = 23 June 2006|access-date = 23 February 2019|archive-date = 21 May 2022|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220521001103/https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/plutos_moons.html|url-status = dead}}</ref> The ''New Horizons'' team had suspected that Pluto and its moon ] might be accompanied by other moons, hence they used the Hubble Space Telescope to search for faint moons around Pluto in 2005.<ref name="ChasingNH" /> Since Nix's brightness is about 5,000 times fainter than Pluto, long exposure images were taken in order to find it.<ref name="indepth">{{Cite web|title = Nix In Depth|url = https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/pluto-moons/nix/in-depth/|website = solarsystem.nasa.gov|access-date = 23 February 2019}}</ref>
== Orbit ==
]
Nix follows a circular orbit in the same plane as ]. Its orbital period of 24.9 days is close to a 1:4 ] with Charon, but the timing discrepancy is 2.7%, which suggests that there is no active resonance.<ref name="Buie_2006" /> A hypothesis explaining such a near-resonance is that it originated before the outward migration of Charon following the formation of all five known moons, and is maintained by the periodic local fluctuation of 9% in the Pluto–Charon gravitational field strength.<!--- The instantaneous force in the Pluto–Charon–Nix alignment case is 9.46% larger than in the quadrature case (where Nix is 90° from the Pluto–Charon axis); the Charon–Pluto–Nix case is almost exactly halfway between these values. In Buie ''et al.'', the quote is "The gravitational force exerted by Pluto on either P1 or P2 varies by roughly 15% (peak-to-peak)." Pluto's gravitational pull, ''by itself'', varies by 18% for Nix and 13% for Hydra --->


The discovery images were taken on 15&nbsp;May 2005 and 18&nbsp;May 2005. The discoveries were announced on 31&nbsp;October 2005, after confirmation by ] archival Hubble images of Pluto from 2002.<ref name="hubblesite">{{cite web|url=http://hubblesite.org/news_release/news/2005-19|title=NASA's Hubble Reveals Possible New Moons Around Pluto|date=31 October 2005|website=www.hubblesite.org}}</ref> The two newly announced moons of Pluto were subsequently ] S/2005 P 1 for Hydra and '''S/2005 P 2''' for Nix. The moons were informally referred to as "P1" and "P2", respectively by the discovery team.<ref name="IAUC8625">{{cite web|url=http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/iauc/08600/08625.html|title=IAU Circular No. 8625|date=31 October 2005|website=www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu}} describing the discovery</ref>
As it orbits, it flips up and down on its axis, with the north pole becoming the south pole and vice versa, periodically. <ref name=nbcnews>{{cite web|last1=Boyle|first1=Alan|title=Pluto's Moons Raise New Puzzles for NASA's New Horizons Mission|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/plutos-moons-raise-new-puzzles-nasas-new-horizons-mission-n368741|website=NBC News.com|publisher=NBC News|accessdate=3 June 2015|ref=nbcnews}}</ref>

{{clear left}}
== Naming ==
]

The name Nix was approved by the ] (IAU) and was announced on 21 June 2006 along with the naming of Hydra in the IAU Circular 8723.<ref name="IAUC8723"> naming the moons.</ref> Nix was named after ], the Greek goddess of darkness and night and mother of ], the ferryman of ] in ]. The two newly named moons were intentionally named that the order of their initials ''N'' and ''H'' honors the ''New Horizons'' mission to Pluto, similarly to how the first two letters of Pluto's name honors ].<ref name="UniverseToday2006">{{cite web|title=Pluto's New Moons are Named Nix and Hydra|author=Cain, Fraser | date=2006 | url= https://www.universetoday.com/152/plutos-new-moons-are-named-nix-and-hydra/|website=www.universetoday.com|access-date= 23 February 2019}}</ref><ref name="ChasingNH">{{cite book |last1=Stern |first1=Alan |last2=Grinspoon |first2=David |title=]: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto |publisher=Picador |date=May 1, 2018 |chapter=Chapter 7: Bringing It All Together |isbn=978-1-250-09896-2}}</ref> The original proposal for the naming of Nix was to use the ] spelling ], but to avoid confusion with the ] ], the spelling was changed to Nix, the ] spelling of the name.<ref name="UniverseToday2006" /> The adjectival form of the name is Nictian (cf. Russian Никта ''Nikta'').

The names of features on the bodies in the Pluto system are related to mythology and the literature and history of exploration. In particular, the names of features on Nix must be related to deities of the night from literature, mythology, and history.<ref name="nomenclature" />

== Origin ==

Pluto's smaller moons, including Nix, were thought to have formed from ] between Pluto and another Kuiper belt object, similarly to how the ] is believed to have formed from debris ejected by a ].<ref name="SternFormation">{{Cite journal | last = Stern | first = S. A. | author-link = Alan Stern | author2 = Weaver, H. A. | author3 = Steff, A. J. | author4 = Mutchler, M. J. | author5 = Merline, W. J. | author6 = Buie, M. W. | author7 = Young, E. F. | author8 = Young, L. A. | author9 = Spencer, J. R. | title = A giant impact origin for Pluto's small moons and satellite multiplicity in the Kuiper belt | journal = ] | volume = 439 | issue = 7079 | pages = 946–948 | date = 23 February 2006 | url = http://ns1.plutoportal.net/~layoung/eprint/Stern2006plutosat.pdf | doi = 10.1038/nature04548 | access-date = 20 July 2011 | bibcode = 2006Natur.439..946S | pmid = 16495992 | s2cid = 4400037 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120119001455/http://ns1.plutoportal.net/~layoung/eprint/Stern2006plutosat.pdf | archive-date = 19 January 2012 }}</ref> The ejecta from the collision would then coalesce into the moons of Pluto.<ref name="chaos" /> However, the collisional hypothesis cannot explain how Nix maintained its highly reflective surface.<ref name="DPS15" />


== Physical characteristics == == Physical characteristics ==
Although its size has not been directly measured, Nix has been calculated to have a diameter of between {{convert|46|and|137|km|sp=us|0}}. To meet the lower end of the range, its ] would have to be similar to Charon's 35%. For it to be the at the higher end of the range, it would have to have a reflectivity of 4%, like the darkest ] objects.<ref name="Weaver2006"/> Nix is slightly fainter than ], suggesting that it is somewhat smaller in size.<ref name="Stern06b"/> In the discovery image, Nix is 6,300 times fainter than Pluto.<ref name=brightness>Brightness Difference on 2005-05-15: (5th root of 100) ^ (Nix ] 23.38 – Pluto APmag 13.87) = 6,368x</ref>


Nix has an elongated shape, with its longest axis measured at {{convert|49.8|km|mi|abbr=on}} across and its shortest axis {{convert|31.1|km|mi|abbr=on}} across. This gives Nix the measured dimensions of {{convert|49.8|×|33.2|x|31.1|km|mi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="phasecurves" />
Early research appeared to show that Nix was reddish like ] and unlike the other moons,<ref name="Buie_2006" /> but more recent reports have been that it is grey like the remaining satellites.<ref name="Stern06b">{{cite journal | author=Stern, S. A. |author2=Mutchler, M. J. |author3=Weaver, H. A. |author4= Steffl, A. J. |title=''The Positions, Colors, and Photometric Variability of Pluto's Small Satellites from HST Observations 2005–2006'' |journal=Astronomical Journal |date=2006 |pages=submitted | issue=3 | doi=10.1086/506347 | volume=132 | bibcode=2006AJ....132.1405S|arxiv = astro-ph/0607507 }} ()</ref>
It is the third-largest moon of Pluto, being slightly smaller than ].


Early research appeared to show that the surface of Nix is reddish in color.<ref name="Buie_2006" /> Contrary to this, other studies show that Nix is spectrally neutral, similar to the small moons of Pluto.<ref name="Stern06b">{{cite journal |last1=Stern |first1=S. A. |last2=Mutchler |first2=M. J. |last3=Weaver |first3=H. A. |last4=Steffl |first4=A. J. |title=The Positions, Colors, and Photometric Variability of Pluto's Small Satellites from HST Observations 2005–2006 |journal=Astronomical Journal |date=2006 |volume=132 |issue=3 |doi=10.1086/506347 |bibcode=2006AJ....132.1405S |arxiv = astro-ph/0605014 |pages=1405–1414|s2cid=14360964 }}</ref><ref name="Weaver2016" /> The neutral spectrum of Nix signifies that water ice is present on its surface.<ref name="DPS15" /> Nix also appeared to vary in brightness and ], or reflectivity.<ref name="Stern06b" /> The brightness fluctuations were thought to be caused by areas with different albedos on the surface of Nix.<ref name="Stern06b" /> Images of Nix from the ''New Horizons'' spacecraft show a large reddish area approximately {{convert|18|km|mi|abbr=on}} across, which could explain the two conflicting measurements of Nix's surface color.<ref name="UniverseToday" /><ref name="nasa.gov">{{cite web|title=New Horizons Captures Two of Pluto's Smaller Moons|url=http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/new-horizons-captures-two-of-plutos-smaller-moons/|publisher=NASA|date=21 July 2015}}</ref>
== Name ==
The formal name "Nix", from ] and mother of ], was announced on June 21, 2006 on ] Circular 8723,<ref name="IAUC8723"> naming the moons</ref> where the designation '''Pluto II''' is also given. Together with Hydra (Pluto's third moon) the initials are those of the unmanned '']'' spaceprobe. The initial proposal was to use the ] spelling ], but to avoid confusion with the ] ] the spelling was changed to Nix. The USGS Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature states that Nix is the "Egyptian spelling",<ref name="Gazetteer">{{cite web
| title=Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers
| work=Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature
| publisher=USGS Astrogeology
| date=July 21, 2006
| url=http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/append7.html
| accessdate=2006-08-15 }}</ref>
while Jürgen Blunck explains it as the "Spanish translation" of the Greek name.<ref>Blunck, Jürgen, ''Solar System Moons: Discovery and Mythology'' (2009), p. 129.</ref>


The reddish area is thought to be a large impact crater where the reddish material was ejected from underneath Nix's water ice layer and deposited on its surface.<ref name="SimonPort2015">{{cite web|last1=Porter|first1=Simon|title=Pluto's Small Moons Nix and Hydra|url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/pluto/2015/10/05/plutos-small-moons-nix-and-hydra/|website=blogs.nasa.gov|date=5 October 2015 |access-date=23 February 2019}}</ref> In this case, Nix would likely have ]s originating from the impact.<ref name="Weaver2016" /> Another explanation suggests that the reddish material may have originated from a collision with Nix and another object with a different composition. However, there were no significant color variations on other impact craters on Nix.<ref name="Weaver2016" />
== See also ==

*]
], showing its ]]]
The water ice present on the surface of Nix is responsible for its high reflectivity.<ref name="UniverseToday" /><ref name="DPS15" /> Trace amounts of frozen ] may be also present on the surface of Nix, and could be responsible for the presence of reddish material, likely ]s, on its surface.<ref name="UniverseToday" /> In this case, tholins on the surface of Nix may have originated from the reaction of methane with ] radiation from the ].<ref name="UniverseToday" /> Derived from crater counting data from ''New Horizons'', the age of Nix's surface is estimated to be at least four billion years old.<ref name="arxiv1803">{{cite arXiv |last1=Woo |first1=M. Y. |last2=Lee |first2=M. H. |title=On the Early In Situ Formation of Pluto's Small Satellites |date=6 March 2018|eprint= 1803.02005|class=astro-ph.EP }}</ref><ref name="Weaver2016"/>

=== Rotation ===
]
Nix is not ] and ] ] similarly to all smaller moons of Pluto; the moon's axial tilt and rotation period vary greatly over short timescales.<ref name="chaos">{{Cite web|title = NASA's Hubble Finds Pluto's Moons Tumbling in Absolute Chaos|url = https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-hubble-finds-pluto-s-moons-tumbling-in-absolute-chaos|website = NASA|date = 3 June 2015|access-date = 25 October 2015|first = Karen|last = Northon}}</ref> Due to the chaotic rotation of Nix, it can occasionally flip its entire ].<ref name="NYT2015">{{cite web|last1=Chang|first1=Kenneth|title=Astronomers Describe the Chaotic Dance of Pluto's Moons|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/science/space/pluto-moons-orbits-described-in-nature-article.html|work=The New York Times|date=3 June 2015|access-date=28 February 2019}}</ref> The varying gravitational influences of Pluto and Charon as they orbit their ] causes the chaotic tumbling of Pluto's small moons, including Nix.<ref name="chaos" /> The chaotic tumbling of Nix is also strengthened by its elongated shape, which creates ]s that act on the object.<ref name="chaos" /><ref name="ShowalterHamilton2015" /> At the time of the ''New Horizons'' flyby, Nix was rotating with a period of 43.9 hours retrograde to Pluto's equator with an axial tilt of 132 degrees — it was rotating backwards in relation to its orbit around Pluto.<ref name="DPS15">{{cite web|last1=Lakdawalla|first1=Emily|title=DPS 2015: Pluto's small moons Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra|url=http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2015/dps15-1110-small-moons.html|website=The Planetary Society|access-date=14 November 2015|archive-date=27 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170927202313/http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2015/dps15-1110-small-moons.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The rotation rate of Nix had increased by 10 percent since Nix was discovered.<ref name="DPS15" />

== Orbit ==
{{multiple image | align = right | direction = horizontal | width =
| header = Animation of moons of Pluto around the ] of Pluto – ] plane
| image1 = Animation of moons of Pluto - Front view.gif
| caption1 = Front view
| image2 = Animation of moons of Pluto - Side view.gif
| caption2 = Side view
| footer ={{legend2|khaki| ]}}{{·}}{{legend2|RoyalBlue| ]}}{{·}}{{legend2|Lime| ]}}{{·}}{{legend2|Magenta| Nix}}{{·}}{{legend2|Cyan| ]}}{{·}}{{legend2|Orangered| ]}}
}}

Nix orbits the Pluto-Charon ] at a distance of {{convert|48694|km|mi|abbr=on}}, between the orbits of ] and ].<ref name="scimag000" /> All of Pluto's moons including Nix have very circular orbits that are coplanar to Charon's orbit; the moons of Pluto have very low ]s to Pluto's equator.<ref name="arxiv0511837" /><ref name="arxiv0802.2951" /> The nearly circular and coplanar orbits of Pluto's moons suggest that they may have gone through tidal evolutions since their formation.<ref name="arxiv0511837" /> At the time of the formation of Pluto's smaller moons, Nix may have had a more ] orbit around the Pluto-Charon barycenter.<ref name="tidaldamping" /> The present circular orbit of Nix may have been caused by Charon's tidal damping of the eccentricity of Nix's orbit, through tidal interactions. The mutual tidal interactions of Charon on Nix's orbit would cause Nix to transfer its orbital eccentricity to Charon, thus causing the orbit of Nix to gradually become more circular over time.<ref name="tidaldamping" />

Nix has an orbital period of 24.8546 days and its orbit is resonant with other moons of Pluto.<ref name="ShowalterHamilton2015" /> Nix is in a 3:2 ] with Hydra, and a 9:11 resonance with Styx (the ratios represent numbers of orbits completed per unit time; the period ratios are the inverses).<ref name="ShowalterHamilton2015" /><ref name="Witze2015">{{cite journal|last1=Witze|first1=Alexandra|title=Pluto's moons move in synchrony|journal=Nature|year=2015|doi=10.1038/nature.2015.17681|s2cid=134519717}}</ref> As a result of this "Laplace-like" 3-body resonance, it has conjunctions with Styx and Hydra in a 2:3 ratio.

Nix's orbital period is close to a 1:4 orbital resonance with Charon, with a timing discrepancy of 2.8%; there is no active resonance.<ref name="ShowalterHamilton2015" /><ref name="Buie_2006" /> A hypothesis explaining such a near-resonance is that the resonances originated before the outward migration of Charon following the formation of all five known moons, and is maintained by the periodic local fluctuation of 9 percent in the Pluto–Charon gravitational field strength.{{efn | The instantaneous force in the Pluto–Charon–Nix alignment case is 9.46% larger than in the quadrature case (where Nix is 90° from the Pluto–Charon axis); the Charon–Pluto–Nix case is almost exactly halfway between these values. In Buie ''et al.'', the quote is "The gravitational force exerted by Pluto on either P1 or P2 varies by roughly 15% (peak-to-peak)." Pluto's gravitational pull, ''by itself'', varies by 18% for Nix and 13% for Hydra.}}

{{center|
{{Annotated image
|image=Hydra, Nix, Styx conjunctions cycle.png
|image-width=625
|width=625
|height=124<!-- to crop the lower part of the image -->
|float=center
|annotations=<!-- this parameter must be there, empty or not! -->
|caption=Sequence of conjunctions of Hydra (blue), Nix (red) and Styx (black) over one third of their resonance cycle. Movements are counterclockwise and orbits completed are tallied at upper right of diagrams (click on image to see the whole cycle).}}
}}

== Exploration ==
{{multiple image
|direction=horizontal
|align=right
|width1=121
|width2=130
|image1=Nix in Color Released September 11 2015.png
|image2=Pluto's Moon Nix, Half Illuminated.jpg
|caption1=LORRI and MVIC color composite image of Nix
|caption2=Nix half illuminated, imaged by '']''}}

The '']'' spacecraft visited the Pluto system and photographed Pluto and its moons during its flyby on 14 July 2015. Of Pluto's smaller moons, only Nix and Hydra were imaged at resolutions high enough for surface features to be visible.<ref name="DPS15" /> Prior to the flyby of the Pluto system, measurements of Nix's size were performed by the ] on board ''New Horizons'', initially estimating Nix to be about {{convert|35|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter.<ref name="Measurement">{{cite web |url= http://www.nasa.gov/feature/how-big-is-pluto-new-horizons-settles-decades-long-debate/ |title=How Big Is Pluto? ''New Horizons'' Settles Decades-Long Debate|date=13 July 2015 |publisher=] |access-date=13 July 2015}}</ref> The first detailed images of Nix taken by ''New Horizons'' from a distance of about {{convert|231000|km|mi|abbr=on}} were downlinked, or received from the spacecraft on 18 July 2015 and released to the public on 21 July 2015.<ref name="nasa.gov" /> With an image resolution {{convert|3|km|mi|abbr=on}} per pixel, Nix's shape was often referred to as a "jelly bean" shape.<ref name="nasa.gov" /> Enhanced color images from the ] instrument of ''New Horizons'' show a reddish region on its surface.<ref name="nasa.gov" /> From those images, another accurate measurement of Nix's dimensions was made, giving the approximate dimensions of {{convert|42|×|36|km|mi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="nasa.gov" />
{{clear}}

== Notes ==
{{notelist}}


== References == == References ==
Line 71: Line 126:
| refs = | refs =


<ref name="scimag000">{{cite journal|last1=Stern|first1=S. A.|last2=Bagenal|first2=F.|last3=Ennico|first3=K.|last4=Gladstone|first4=G. R.|title=The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons|journal=Science|date=15 October 2015|volume=350|issue=6258|pages=aad1815|doi=10.1126/science.aad1815|pmid=26472913|display-authors=etal|arxiv = 1510.07704 |bibcode = 2015Sci...350.1815S |s2cid=1220226}}</ref>
<ref name="Buie_2006">
{{cite doi | 10.1086/504422 }}. ''a, i, e'' per (site updated 2008 Aug 25)
</ref>


<ref name="Buie_2006">{{cite journal| doi = 10.1086/504422| last1 = Buie| first1 = Marc W.| last2 = Grundy| first2 = William M.| last3 = Young| first3 = Eliot F.| last4 = Young| first4 = Leslie A.| last5 = Stern| first5 = S. Alan| year = 2006| title = Orbits and Photometry of Pluto's Satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005 P2| journal = The Astronomical Journal| volume = 132| issue = 1| pages = 290–298| bibcode = 2006AJ....132..290B| arxiv = astro-ph/0512491| s2cid = 119386667}}. ''a, i, e'' per (site updated 2008 Aug 25)</ref>
}}


* {{cite journal|journal=The Astronomical Journal |author=Steffl, A. J. |display-authors=4 |author2=Mutchler, M. J. |author3=Weaver, H. A. |author4=Stern, S. A. |author5=Durda, D. D. |author5-link=Daniel David Durda |author6=Terrell, D. |author6-link=Dirk Terrell |author7=Merline, W. J. |author8=Young, L. A. |author9=Young, E. F. |author10=Buie, M. W. |author11=Spencer, J. R. |last-author-amp=yes |date=2006 |title=New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System |volume=132|issue=2 |pages=614–619 |doi=10.1086/505424 |bibcode=2006AJ....132..614S|arxiv = astro-ph/0511837 }}() <ref name="arxiv0511837">{{cite journal|journal=The Astronomical Journal |author=Steffl, A. J. |display-authors=4 |author2=Mutchler, M. J. |author3=Weaver, H. A. |author4=Stern, S. A. |author5=Durda, D. D. |author5-link=Daniel David Durda |author6=Terrell, D. |author6-link=Dirk Terrell |author7=Merline, W. J. |author8=Young, L. A. |author9=Young, E. F. |author10=Buie, M. W. |author11=Spencer, J. R. |name-list-style=amp |date=2006 |title=New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System |volume=132|issue=2 |pages=614–619 |doi=10.1086/505424 |bibcode=2006AJ....132..614S|arxiv = astro-ph/0511837 |s2cid=10547358 }}()</ref>

<ref name="nomenclature">{{cite web|title=Naming of Astronomical Objects|url=https://www.iau.org/public/themes/naming/#dwarfplanets|publisher=International Astronomical Union}}</ref>

<ref name="phasecurves">{{cite journal |last1=Verbiscer |first1=A. J. |last2=Porter |first2=S. B. |last3=Buratti |first3=B. J. |last4=Weaver |first4=H. A. |last5=Spencer |first5=J. R. |last6=Showalter |first6=M. R. |last7=Buie |first7=M. W. |last8=Hofgartner |first8=J. D. |last9=Hicks |first9=M. D. |last10=Ennico-Smith |first10=K. |last11=Olkin |first11=C. B. |last12=Stern |first12=S. A. |last13=Young |first13=L. A. |last14=Cheng |first14=A. |title=Phase Curves of Nix and Hydra from the ''New Horizons'' Imaging Cameras |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |date=2018 |volume=852 |issue=2 |pages=L35 |doi=10.3847/2041-8213/aaa486|doi-access=free |bibcode=2018ApJ...852L..35V }}</ref>

<ref name="tidaldamping">{{cite arXiv|eprint=0802.2939|last1=Stern|first1=S. A.|title=The Effect of Charon's Tidal Damping on the Orbits of Pluto's Three Moons|last2=Mutchler|first2=M. J.|last3=Weaver|first3=H. A.|last4=Steffl|first4=A. J.|class=astro-ph|year=2008}}</ref>

<ref name="arxiv0802.2951">{{cite arXiv |eprint=0802.2951|last1=Stern|first1=S. A.|title=On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra|last2=Mutchler|first2=M. J.|last3=Weaver|first3=H. A.|last4=Steffl|first4=A. J.|class=astro-ph|year=2008}}</ref>

<ref name="Weaver2016">{{cite journal
|display-authors = etal
|first1 = H. A. |last1 = Weaver
|first2 = M. W. |last2 = Buie
|first3 = B. J. |last3 = Buratti
|first4 = W. M. |last4 = Grundy
|first5 = T. R. |last5 = Lauer
|first6 = C. B. |last6 = Olkin
|title = The Small Satellites of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons
|journal = Science
|date = March 2016
|volume = 351
|issue = 6279
|id = aae0030
|pages = 5
|doi = 10.1126/science.aae0030
|arxiv = 1604.05366
|bibcode = 2016Sci...351.0030W
|pmid = 26989256
|s2cid = 206646188}}</ref>

<ref name="Weaver2016-supp">{{cite journal
|display-authors = etal
|first1 = H. A. |last1 = Weaver
|first2 = M. W. |last2 = Buie
|first3 = B. J. |last3 = Buratti
|first4 = W. M. |last4 = Grundy
|first5 = T. R. |last5 = Lauer
|first6 = C. B. |last6 = Olkin
|title = Supplementary Materials for The Small Satellites of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons
|url = http://www.sciencemag.org/content/351/6279/aae0030/suppl/DC1
|journal = Science
|date = March 2016
|volume = 351
|issue = 6279
|id = aae0030
|pages = 25
|doi = 10.1126/science.aae0030
|arxiv = 1604.05366
|bibcode = 2016Sci...351.0030W
|pmid = 26989256
|s2cid = 206646188}}</ref>

<ref name="Porter2023">{{cite journal
|first1 = Simon B. |last1 = Porter
|first2 = Robin M. |last2 = Canup
|title = Orbits and Masses of the Small Satellites of Pluto
|journal = The Planetary Science Journal
|date = July 2023
|volume = 4
|issue = 7
|id = 120
|pages = 14
|doi-access = free
|doi = 10.3847/PSJ/acde77
|arxiv = 2307.04848
|bibcode = 2023PSJ.....4..120P
|s2cid = }}</ref>
}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{Commons category|Nix}}
* by
* – The discoverers' website * – The discoverers' website
* – Hubble press release * – Hubble press release
* – NASA Solar System Exploration
* (SPACE.com)
* (SPACE.com)


{{Pluto}} {{Pluto}}
{{Moons of dwarf planets}} {{Moons of dwarf planets}}
{{Trans-Neptunian objects}} {{Trans-Neptunian objects}}
{{Portal bar|Astronomy|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System}}

] ]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 15:47, 10 October 2024

Moon of Pluto This article is about the moon of Pluto. Not to be confused with the asteroid 3908 Nyx.

Nix
Enhanced color image of Nix, taken by New Horizons
Discovery
Discovered byHal A. Weaver et al.
Discovery date15 May 2005
Designations
DesignationPluto II
Pronunciation/ˈnɪks/
Named afterNyx
Alternative namesS/2005 P 2
AdjectivesNictian (/ˈnɪktiən/)
Orbital characteristics
Semi-major axis48694±3 km
Eccentricity0.002036±0.000050
Orbital period (sidereal)24.85463±0.00003 d
Inclination0.133°±0.008° (122.53°±0.008° to Pluto's orbit)
Satellite ofPluto
Physical characteristics
Dimensions49.8 × 33.2 × 31.1 km
(Geometric mean of 37 km)
Mass(2.60±0.52)×10 kg
Mean density1.031±0.204 g/cm
Surface gravity≈ 0.0028 m/s at longest axis
to ≈ 0.0072 m/s at poles
Escape velocity≈ 0.0118 km/s at longest axis
to ≈ 0.0149 km/s at poles
Synodic rotation period1.829±0.009 d chaotic (decreased by 10% between discovery and flyby)
Axial tilt123°±10° (to Pluto–Charon orbit)
48°±10° (to celestial equator)
North pole right ascension350°±10°
North pole declination42°±10°
Albedo0.56±0.05
Apparent magnitude23.38–23.7 (measured)
Absolute magnitude (H)8.28

Nix is a natural satellite of Pluto, with a diameter of 49.8 km (30.9 mi) across its longest dimension. It was discovered along with Pluto's outermost moon Hydra on 15 May 2005 by astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope, and was named after Nyx, the Greek goddess of the night. Nix is the third moon of Pluto by distance, orbiting between the moons Styx and Kerberos.

Nix was imaged along with Pluto and its other moons by the New Horizons spacecraft as it flew by the Pluto system in July 2015. Images from the New Horizons spacecraft reveal a large reddish area on Nix that is likely an impact crater.

Discovery

Discovery images of Nix and Hydra

Nix was independently discovered by Max Mutchler and Andrew Steffl, members of the Pluto Companion Search Team, using the Hubble Space Telescope. The New Horizons team had suspected that Pluto and its moon Charon might be accompanied by other moons, hence they used the Hubble Space Telescope to search for faint moons around Pluto in 2005. Since Nix's brightness is about 5,000 times fainter than Pluto, long exposure images were taken in order to find it.

The discovery images were taken on 15 May 2005 and 18 May 2005. The discoveries were announced on 31 October 2005, after confirmation by precovering archival Hubble images of Pluto from 2002. The two newly announced moons of Pluto were subsequently provisionally designated S/2005 P 1 for Hydra and S/2005 P 2 for Nix. The moons were informally referred to as "P1" and "P2", respectively by the discovery team.

Naming

Hubble image of Pluto's moons (annotated)

The name Nix was approved by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) and was announced on 21 June 2006 along with the naming of Hydra in the IAU Circular 8723. Nix was named after Nyx, the Greek goddess of darkness and night and mother of Charon, the ferryman of Hades in Greek mythology. The two newly named moons were intentionally named that the order of their initials N and H honors the New Horizons mission to Pluto, similarly to how the first two letters of Pluto's name honors Percival Lowell. The original proposal for the naming of Nix was to use the classical spelling Nyx, but to avoid confusion with the asteroid 3908 Nyx, the spelling was changed to Nix, the Coptic spelling of the name. The adjectival form of the name is Nictian (cf. Russian Никта Nikta).

The names of features on the bodies in the Pluto system are related to mythology and the literature and history of exploration. In particular, the names of features on Nix must be related to deities of the night from literature, mythology, and history.

Origin

Pluto's smaller moons, including Nix, were thought to have formed from debris ejected from a massive collision between Pluto and another Kuiper belt object, similarly to how the Moon is believed to have formed from debris ejected by a large collision of Earth. The ejecta from the collision would then coalesce into the moons of Pluto. However, the collisional hypothesis cannot explain how Nix maintained its highly reflective surface.

Physical characteristics

Nix has an elongated shape, with its longest axis measured at 49.8 km (30.9 mi) across and its shortest axis 31.1 km (19.3 mi) across. This gives Nix the measured dimensions of 49.8 km × 33.2 km × 31.1 km (30.9 mi × 20.6 mi × 19.3 mi). It is the third-largest moon of Pluto, being slightly smaller than Hydra.

Early research appeared to show that the surface of Nix is reddish in color. Contrary to this, other studies show that Nix is spectrally neutral, similar to the small moons of Pluto. The neutral spectrum of Nix signifies that water ice is present on its surface. Nix also appeared to vary in brightness and albedo, or reflectivity. The brightness fluctuations were thought to be caused by areas with different albedos on the surface of Nix. Images of Nix from the New Horizons spacecraft show a large reddish area approximately 18 km (11 mi) across, which could explain the two conflicting measurements of Nix's surface color.

The reddish area is thought to be a large impact crater where the reddish material was ejected from underneath Nix's water ice layer and deposited on its surface. In this case, Nix would likely have regoliths originating from the impact. Another explanation suggests that the reddish material may have originated from a collision with Nix and another object with a different composition. However, there were no significant color variations on other impact craters on Nix.

Simulation of Nix, modelled as an ellipsoid, showing its chaotic rotation

The water ice present on the surface of Nix is responsible for its high reflectivity. Trace amounts of frozen methane may be also present on the surface of Nix, and could be responsible for the presence of reddish material, likely tholins, on its surface. In this case, tholins on the surface of Nix may have originated from the reaction of methane with ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. Derived from crater counting data from New Horizons, the age of Nix's surface is estimated to be at least four billion years old.

Rotation

Six images of Nix taken by the New Horizons in July 2015 (contrast enhanced)

Nix is not tidally locked and tumbles chaotically similarly to all smaller moons of Pluto; the moon's axial tilt and rotation period vary greatly over short timescales. Due to the chaotic rotation of Nix, it can occasionally flip its entire rotational axis. The varying gravitational influences of Pluto and Charon as they orbit their barycenter causes the chaotic tumbling of Pluto's small moons, including Nix. The chaotic tumbling of Nix is also strengthened by its elongated shape, which creates torques that act on the object. At the time of the New Horizons flyby, Nix was rotating with a period of 43.9 hours retrograde to Pluto's equator with an axial tilt of 132 degrees — it was rotating backwards in relation to its orbit around Pluto. The rotation rate of Nix had increased by 10 percent since Nix was discovered.

Orbit

Animation of moons of Pluto around the barycenter of Pluto – Ecliptic planeFront viewSide view   Pluto ·    Charon ·    Styx ·    Nix ·    Kerberos ·    Hydra

Nix orbits the Pluto-Charon barycenter at a distance of 48,694 km (30,257 mi), between the orbits of Styx and Kerberos. All of Pluto's moons including Nix have very circular orbits that are coplanar to Charon's orbit; the moons of Pluto have very low orbital inclinations to Pluto's equator. The nearly circular and coplanar orbits of Pluto's moons suggest that they may have gone through tidal evolutions since their formation. At the time of the formation of Pluto's smaller moons, Nix may have had a more eccentric orbit around the Pluto-Charon barycenter. The present circular orbit of Nix may have been caused by Charon's tidal damping of the eccentricity of Nix's orbit, through tidal interactions. The mutual tidal interactions of Charon on Nix's orbit would cause Nix to transfer its orbital eccentricity to Charon, thus causing the orbit of Nix to gradually become more circular over time.

Nix has an orbital period of 24.8546 days and its orbit is resonant with other moons of Pluto. Nix is in a 3:2 orbital resonance with Hydra, and a 9:11 resonance with Styx (the ratios represent numbers of orbits completed per unit time; the period ratios are the inverses). As a result of this "Laplace-like" 3-body resonance, it has conjunctions with Styx and Hydra in a 2:3 ratio.

Nix's orbital period is close to a 1:4 orbital resonance with Charon, with a timing discrepancy of 2.8%; there is no active resonance. A hypothesis explaining such a near-resonance is that the resonances originated before the outward migration of Charon following the formation of all five known moons, and is maintained by the periodic local fluctuation of 9 percent in the Pluto–Charon gravitational field strength.

Sequence of conjunctions of Hydra (blue), Nix (red) and Styx (black) over one third of their resonance cycle. Movements are counterclockwise and orbits completed are tallied at upper right of diagrams (click on image to see the whole cycle).

Exploration

LORRI and MVIC color composite image of NixNix half illuminated, imaged by New Horizons

The New Horizons spacecraft visited the Pluto system and photographed Pluto and its moons during its flyby on 14 July 2015. Of Pluto's smaller moons, only Nix and Hydra were imaged at resolutions high enough for surface features to be visible. Prior to the flyby of the Pluto system, measurements of Nix's size were performed by the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager on board New Horizons, initially estimating Nix to be about 35 km (22 mi) in diameter. The first detailed images of Nix taken by New Horizons from a distance of about 231,000 km (144,000 mi) were downlinked, or received from the spacecraft on 18 July 2015 and released to the public on 21 July 2015. With an image resolution 3 km (1.9 mi) per pixel, Nix's shape was often referred to as a "jelly bean" shape. Enhanced color images from the Ralph MVIC instrument of New Horizons show a reddish region on its surface. From those images, another accurate measurement of Nix's dimensions was made, giving the approximate dimensions of 42 km × 36 km (26 mi × 22 mi).

Notes

  1. The full list of discoverers includes H. A. Weaver, S. A. Stern, M. J. Mutchler, A. J. Steffl, M. W. Buie, W. J. Merline, J. R. Spencer, E. F. Young, and L. A. Young.
  2. Given Nix's rotational north pole declination of +42°, subtracting this angle from the north celestial pole of +90° gives the inclination with respect to the celestial equator: i = +90° – (+42°) = +48°.
  3. The instantaneous force in the Pluto–Charon–Nix alignment case is 9.46% larger than in the quadrature case (where Nix is 90° from the Pluto–Charon axis); the Charon–Pluto–Nix case is almost exactly halfway between these values. In Buie et al., the quote is "The gravitational force exerted by Pluto on either P1 or P2 varies by roughly 15% (peak-to-peak)." Pluto's gravitational pull, by itself, varies by 18% for Nix and 13% for Hydra.

References

  1. ^ "Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN). Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  2. ^ Showalter, M. R.; Hamilton, D. P. (3 June 2015). "Resonant interactions and chaotic rotation of Pluto's small moons". Nature. 522 (7554): 45–49. Bibcode:2015Natur.522...45S. doi:10.1038/nature14469. PMID 26040889. S2CID 205243819.
  3. ^ Verbiscer, A. J.; Porter, S. B.; Buratti, B. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Spencer, J. R.; Showalter, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Hofgartner, J. D.; Hicks, M. D.; Ennico-Smith, K.; Olkin, C. B.; Stern, S. A.; Young, L. A.; Cheng, A. (2018). "Phase Curves of Nix and Hydra from the New Horizons Imaging Cameras". The Astrophysical Journal. 852 (2): L35. Bibcode:2018ApJ...852L..35V. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa486.
  4. ^ Porter, Simon B.; Canup, Robin M. (July 2023). "Orbits and Masses of the Small Satellites of Pluto". The Planetary Science Journal. 4 (7): 14. arXiv:2307.04848. Bibcode:2023PSJ.....4..120P. doi:10.3847/PSJ/acde77. 120.
  5. ^ Weaver, H. A.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Grundy, W. M.; Lauer, T. R.; Olkin, C. B.; et al. (March 2016). "The Small Satellites of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons". Science. 351 (6279): 5. arXiv:1604.05366. Bibcode:2016Sci...351.0030W. doi:10.1126/science.aae0030. PMID 26989256. S2CID 206646188. aae0030.
  6. Northon, Karen (3 June 2015). "NASA's Hubble Finds Pluto's Moons Tumbling in Absolute Chaos".
  7. Lakdawalla, Emily. "DPS 2015: Pluto's small moons Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra [UPDATED]". www.planetary.org. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
  8. Weaver, H. A.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Grundy, W. M.; Lauer, T. R.; Olkin, C. B.; et al. (March 2016). "Supplementary Materials for The Small Satellites of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons". Science. 351 (6279): 25. arXiv:1604.05366. Bibcode:2016Sci...351.0030W. doi:10.1126/science.aae0030. PMID 26989256. S2CID 206646188. aae0030.
  9. ^ Stern, S. A.; Mutchler, M. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Steffl, A. J. (2006). "The Positions, Colors, and Photometric Variability of Pluto's Small Satellites from HST Observations 2005–2006". Astronomical Journal. 132 (3): 1405–1414. arXiv:astro-ph/0605014. Bibcode:2006AJ....132.1405S. doi:10.1086/506347. S2CID 14360964.
  10. ^ "Pluto and Its Moons: Charon, Nix and Hydra". www.nasa.gov. NASA. 23 June 2006. Archived from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  11. ^ Stern, S. A.; Bagenal, F.; Ennico, K.; Gladstone, G. R.; et al. (15 October 2015). "The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons". Science. 350 (6258): aad1815. arXiv:1510.07704. Bibcode:2015Sci...350.1815S. doi:10.1126/science.aad1815. PMID 26472913. S2CID 1220226.
  12. ^ Cain, Fraser (3 September 2015). "Pluto's Moon Nix". www.universetoday.com. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  13. ^ Porter, Simon (5 October 2015). "Pluto's Small Moons Nix and Hydra". blogs.nasa.gov. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  14. ^ Stern, Alan; Grinspoon, David (1 May 2018). "Chapter 7: Bringing It All Together". Chasing New Horizons: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto. Picador. ISBN 978-1-250-09896-2.
  15. "Nix In Depth". solarsystem.nasa.gov. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  16. "NASA's Hubble Reveals Possible New Moons Around Pluto". www.hubblesite.org. 31 October 2005.
  17. "IAU Circular No. 8625". www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu. 31 October 2005. describing the discovery
  18. IAU Circular No. 8723 naming the moons.
  19. ^ Cain, Fraser (2006). "Pluto's New Moons are Named Nix and Hydra". www.universetoday.com. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  20. "Naming of Astronomical Objects". International Astronomical Union.
  21. Stern, S. A.; Weaver, H. A.; Steff, A. J.; Mutchler, M. J.; Merline, W. J.; Buie, M. W.; Young, E. F.; Young, L. A.; Spencer, J. R. (23 February 2006). "A giant impact origin for Pluto's small moons and satellite multiplicity in the Kuiper belt" (PDF). Nature. 439 (7079): 946–948. Bibcode:2006Natur.439..946S. doi:10.1038/nature04548. PMID 16495992. S2CID 4400037. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 20 July 2011.
  22. ^ Northon, Karen (3 June 2015). "NASA's Hubble Finds Pluto's Moons Tumbling in Absolute Chaos". NASA. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  23. ^ Lakdawalla, Emily. "DPS 2015: Pluto's small moons Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
  24. ^ Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; Young, Leslie A.; Stern, S. Alan (2006). "Orbits and Photometry of Pluto's Satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005 P2". The Astronomical Journal. 132 (1): 290–298. arXiv:astro-ph/0512491. Bibcode:2006AJ....132..290B. doi:10.1086/504422. S2CID 119386667.. a, i, e per JPL (site updated 2008 Aug 25)
  25. ^ "New Horizons Captures Two of Pluto's Smaller Moons". NASA. 21 July 2015.
  26. Woo, M. Y.; Lee, M. H. (6 March 2018). "On the Early In Situ Formation of Pluto's Small Satellites". arXiv:1803.02005 .
  27. Chang, Kenneth (3 June 2015). "Astronomers Describe the Chaotic Dance of Pluto's Moons". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  28. ^ Steffl, A. J.; Mutchler, M. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S. A.; et al. (2006). "New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System". The Astronomical Journal. 132 (2): 614–619. arXiv:astro-ph/0511837. Bibcode:2006AJ....132..614S. doi:10.1086/505424. S2CID 10547358.(Final preprint)
  29. Stern, S. A.; Mutchler, M. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Steffl, A. J. (2008). "On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra". arXiv:0802.2951 .
  30. ^ Stern, S. A.; Mutchler, M. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Steffl, A. J. (2008). "The Effect of Charon's Tidal Damping on the Orbits of Pluto's Three Moons". arXiv:0802.2939 .
  31. Witze, Alexandra (2015). "Pluto's moons move in synchrony". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17681. S2CID 134519717.
  32. "How Big Is Pluto? New Horizons Settles Decades-Long Debate". NASA. 13 July 2015. Retrieved 13 July 2015.

External links

Pluto
Geography
(features)
Regions
Hills and
mountains
Plains
Valleys and
depressions
Lineae
Craters
Pluto
Both to scale
Charon
Moons
Exploration
Astronomy
Official definitions
Scientist opinions
Discovery
General
Related
Moons of likely dwarf planets
PlutoHaumeaErisMakemakeGonggong
QuaoarOrcusSalaciaVarda2013 FY27
Trans-Neptunian objects
TNO classes
Dwarf planets (moons)
Sednoids
Portals: Categories: