Misplaced Pages

Operation Northwoods: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:12, 16 June 2015 editGB fan (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators103,303 edits Reverted 1 edit by USAismisunderstood: Not a reliable source, it says it comes from WIkipedia, and we can not use a previous version of this article to verify the information in the current version of this article. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:01, 11 December 2024 edit undoRja13ww33 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,778 edits Undid revision 1262354793 by Drinkwine28 (talk) Not a minor edit. And much of it is already in the article.Tag: Undo 
(474 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1962 proposed US false flag operation against American citizens}}
, ''U.S. Department of Defense'', 13 March 1962. The Operation Northwoods document in ] format on the website of the independent, non-governmental research institute the ] at the ] Gelman Library, Washington, D.C. Direct PDF links: and .</ref>]] ] |date=13 March 1962}}. The Operation Northwoods document in ] format on the website of the independent, non-governmental research institute the ] at the ] Gelman Library, Washington, D.C. Direct PDF links: and .</ref>]]
], who was in charge as the ]]]


'''Operation Northwoods''' was a proposed ] operation that originated within the ] of the ] in 1962. The proposals called for ] operatives to both stage and commit acts of ] against American military and civilian targets, blame them on the ], and use them to justify a war against Cuba. The possibilities detailed in the document included the remote control of civilian aircraft which would be secretly repainted as US Air Force planes,<ref name=":1" /> a fabricated 'shoot down' of a US Air Force fighter aircraft off the coast of Cuba, the possible assassination of Cuban immigrants, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |url=https://archive.org/details/1962USJointChiefsOfStaffOperationNorthwoodsUnclassifiedDocument/page/n11 |title=1962 US Joint Chiefs Of Staff Operation Northwoods Unclassified Document Bolsheviks NWO |date=1962 |website=]}}</ref> blowing up a U.S. ship, and orchestrating terrorism in U.S. cities.<ref name=":1">{{cite web |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1 |title=U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba |date=7 January 2006 |website=]}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web |date=13 March 1962 |title=Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense. Subject: Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS) |url=https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf |website=The George Washington University |page=11}}</ref> The proposals were rejected by President ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1#.TxsGQG_Ox2B |title=U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba |publisher=] |date=May 1, 2001 |access-date=January 21, 2012 |last=Ruppe |first=David}}</ref><ref>Jim Wolf, ''Reuters'', 18 November 1997.</ref><ref name=feinsilber1>Mike Feinsilber, ''Associated Press'' (''AP''), 18 November 1997; also available .</ref>
]


] had taken power in Cuba in 1959 and began allowing communists into the new Cuban government, nationalizing U.S. businesses and improving relations with the Soviet Union, arousing the concern of the U.S. military due to the ]. The operation proposed creating public support for a war against Cuba by blaming the Cuban government for terrorist acts that would be perpetrated by the U.S. government.<ref name="northwoods1" /> To this end, Operation Northwoods proposals recommended hijackings and ]ings followed by the introduction of false evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:
'''Operation Northwoods''' was a proposed operation against the Cuban government, that originated within the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the ] in 1962. The proposals called for the ] (CIA) or other US government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba. The proposals were rejected by the ].<ref>{{cite web | url=http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1#.TxsGQG_Ox2B | title=U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba | publisher=ABC News | date=May 1, 2001 | accessdate=January 21, 2012 | author=Ruppe, David}}</ref>
<blockquote>The desired result from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.</blockquote>


Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various ] and civilian targets. The operation recommended developing a "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington", which involved the bombing of civilian targets, which was to be blamed on the Cuban government to paint a false image of Fidel Castro and misinform the American public.
At the time of the proposal, communists led by ] had recently taken power in Cuba. The operation proposed creating public support for a war against Cuba by blaming it for terrorist acts that would actually be perpetrated by the US Government (so called "] operations").<ref>] (3 March 2011) , '']''</ref> To this end, Operation Northwoods proposals recommended hijackings and ]ings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:
<blockquote>The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.</blockquote>


The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman ] and sent to the ]. Although part of the US government's anti-communist ], Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the ], but then rejected by President Kennedy. None of the false flag operations became active under the auspices of the Operation Northwoods proposals.
Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various ] and civilian targets. The operation recommended developing a "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".


== Origins and public release ==
The plan was drafted by the ], signed by Chairman ] and sent to the ]. Although part of the US government's anti-communist ], Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President ]. According to currently released documentation, none of the operations became active under the auspices of the Operation Northwoods proposals.
The main Operation Northwoods proposal was presented in a document titled "Justification for ] in Cuba (])," a top secret collection of draft ] written by the ] (DoD) and the ] (JCS).<ref name=northwoods1/> The document was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defense ] on 13 March 1962 as a preliminary submission for planning purposes. The Joint Chiefs recommended that both the covert and overt aspects of any such operation be assigned to them.
The previously secret document was originally made public on 18 November 1997, by the ],<ref> '']''.</ref> a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to ].<ref> ''Assassination Records Review Board'' (a division of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration), 17 November 1997. A U.S.&nbsp;government press-release announcing the declassification of some 1,500 pages of U.S. government documents from 1962 to 1964 relating to U.S.&nbsp;policy towards Cuba, among which declassified documents included the Operation Northwoods document.</ref><ref name=weiner>Tim Weiner, '']'', 19 November 1997; appeared on the same date and by the same author in the ''New York Times'' itself as late edition—final, section A, pg. 25, column 1.</ref> A total of 1,521 pages of once-secret military records covering 1962 to 1964 were ] ] by said Review Board.


"Appendix to Enclosure A" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" of the Northwoods document were first published online by the ] on 6 November 1998 in a joint venture with ] as part of its 1998 ''Cold War'' television documentary series<ref> ''National Security Archive'', 27 September 1998 – 24 January 1999.</ref><ref>U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''U.S. Department of Defense'', c.&nbsp;March 1962. First published online by the ] on 6 November 1998, as part of CNN's ''Cold War'' documentary series. "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the Operation Northwoods document which contains the proposals to stage terrorist attacks.</ref>—specifically, as a documentation supplement to "Episode 10: Cuba," which aired on 29 November 1998.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070126135125/http://www.turnerlearning.com/cnn/coldwar/cw_epsds.html |date=2007-01-26 }} and {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070126231650/http://www.turnerlearning.com/cnn/coldwar/cuba/cuba_ttl.html |date=2007-01-26 }} ''Turner Learning'' (Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.).</ref> "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the document which contains the proposals to stage ] ].
==Origins and public release==
The main proposal was presented in a document titled "Justification for U.S.&nbsp;Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)," a top secret collection of draft ] written by the ] (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).<ref name=northwoods1>U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, , ''U.S. Department of Defense'', 13 March 1962. The Operation Northwoods document in ] format on the website of the independent, non-governmental research institute the ] at the ] Gelman Library, Washington, D.C. Direct PDF links: and .</ref> The document was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defense ] on 13 March 1962 as a preliminary submission for planning purposes. The Joint Chiefs of Staff recommended that both the covert and overt aspects of any such operation be assigned to them.

The previously secret document was originally made public on 18 November 1997, by the ],<ref> '']''.</ref> a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to ].<ref> ''Assassination Records Review Board'' (a division of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration), 17 November 1997. A U.S.&nbsp;government press-release announcing the declassification of some 1,500 pages of U.S. government documents from 1962 to 1964 relating to U.S.&nbsp;policy towards Cuba, among which declassified documents included the Operation Northwoods document.</ref><!--<ref>Jim Wolf, ''Reuters'', 18 November 1997.</ref><ref name=feinsilber1>Mike Feinsilber, ''Associated Press'' (''AP''), 18 November 1997; also available .</ref>--><ref name=weiner>Tim Weiner, '']'', 19 November 1997; appeared on the same date and by the same author in the ''New York Times'' itself as late edition—final, section A, pg. 25, column 1.</ref> A total of 1,521 pages of once-secret military records covering 1962 to 1964 were concomitantly ] by said Review Board.

"Appendix to Enclosure A" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" of the Northwoods document were first published online by the ] on 6 November 1998 in a joint venture with ] as part of its 1998 ''Cold War'' television documentary series<ref> ''National Security Archive'', 27 September 1998 – 24 January 1999.</ref><ref>U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''U.S. Department of Defense'', c.&nbsp;March 1962. First published online by the ] on 6 November 1998, as part of CNN's ''Cold War'' documentary series. "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the Operation Northwoods document which contains the proposals to stage terrorist attacks.</ref>—specifically, as a documentation supplement to "Episode 10: Cuba," which aired on 29 November 1998.<ref> and ''Turner Learning'' (Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.).</ref> "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the document which contains the proposals to stage ].


The Northwoods document was published online in a more complete form, including cover ], by the National Security Archive on 30 April 2001.<ref> ''National Security Archive'', 30 April 2001.</ref> The Northwoods document was published online in a more complete form, including cover ], by the National Security Archive on 30 April 2001.<ref> ''National Security Archive'', 30 April 2001.</ref>


== Content == == Provocations ==
Responding to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. ], the document listed methods, such as false flag provocations, that the authors believed would garner support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. According to the documents, the plan called for several steps to be taken in an attempt to provoke Cuba into an action against the United States, then blame it for "hostilities" carried out by the U.S. against ]; these would be followed by executing offensive operations there against tactical Cuban civilian targets and military emplacements, leading to "large scale United States military operations":

{{ordered list|Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba, a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as had been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.|A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1469a.jpg |title=Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080813000407/http://media.nara.gov/media/images/36/15/36-1469a.jpg |archive-date=2008-08-13 |website=media.nara.gov |access-date=3 September 2009}}</ref>|The United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.|Commence large scale United States military operations.
In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. ], the document listed methods, and outlined plans, that the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. According to the documents, the plan called for the following:
{{ordered list
| Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba, a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as had been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
| A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.<ref>, media.nara.gov, accessed 3 September 2009</ref>
| United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
| Commence large scale United States military operations.
}} }}


==Related Operation Mongoose proposals== == Related Operation Mongoose proposals ==
{{Main|Operation Mongoose}} {{Main|Operation Mongoose}}
], commander of the anti-Cuban ] project]]
In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the U.S. Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals to be taken against the Cuban regime of ].


In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the U.S. Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals for actions to be taken against the Cuban regime of ].
Twelve of these proposals come from a 2 February 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. ], the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.<ref name=feinsilber1>Mike Feinsilber, ''Associated Press'' (''AP''), 18 November 1997; also available .</ref><ref name=weiner>Tim Weiner, '']'', 19 November 1997; appeared on the same date and by the same author in the ''New York Times'' itself as late edition—final, section A, pg. 25, column 1.</ref>


Twelve of these proposals come from a 2 February 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.<ref name=feinsilber1/><ref name=weiner/>
The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a plan to; "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on ], thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."


The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a false flag plan to "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on ], thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."
It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, a plot to blame Castro if the 1962 ] manned space flight carrying ] crashed, saying: "The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al. Cuba {{sic}}." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."


It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, another false flag plot to blame Castro if the 1962 ] crewed space flight carrying ] crashed, saying: "The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al. Cuba." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."
Even after General Lemnitzer lost his job as the ], the Joint Chiefs of Staff still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 1963. A different U.S. Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the ] (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The U.S. Department of Defense document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS."


Even after General Lemnitzer lost his job as the ], the Joint Chiefs still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 1963. A different U.S. Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the ] (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The U.S. Department of Defense document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS."<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PFYLAAAAYAAJ&q=%22A+contrived+'Cuban'+attack%22 |title=The Castro Obsession: U.S. Covert Operations Against Cuba, 1959-1965 |last=Bohning |first=Don |date=2005 |publisher=Potomac Books |isbn=978-1-57488-675-7 |pages=105 |language=en |via=]}}</ref>
The plan expressed confidence that by this action, "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."<ref name=bamford>James Bamford, Chapter&nbsp;4: "Fists" of ''Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency From the Cold War Through the Dawn of a New Century'' (New York: Doubleday, first edition, 24 April 2001), ISBN 0-385-49907-8.</ref><ref>Mike Feinsilber, ''Associated Press'' (''AP''), 29 January 1998.</ref>

The plan expressed confidence that by this action, "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."<ref name=bamford>{{cite book |first=James |last=Bamford |chapter=4: "Fists" |title=Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency From the Cold War Through the Dawn of a New Century |location=New York |publisher=Doubleday |edition=first |date=24 April 2001 |isbn=0-385-49907-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Mike |last=Feinsilber |url=http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y98/jan98/30e6.htm |title=Records Show Plan To Provoke Castro |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050824211208/http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y98/jan98/30e6.htm |archive-date=2005-08-24 |agency=] |date=29 January 1998}}</ref>


Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were ] and ]. Since both were members of the ], the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro.<ref name=bamford/> As the U.S. Department of Defense report noted: Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were ] and ]. Since both were members of the ], the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro.<ref name=bamford/> As the U.S. Department of Defense report noted:
Line 49: Line 45:
<blockquote>Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."<ref name=bamford/></blockquote> <blockquote>Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."<ref name=bamford/></blockquote>


The U.S. Department of Defense report even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on ] base at] Guantanamo."<ref name=bamford/> The U.S. Department of Defense report even suggested covertly paying a person in Castro's government to stage a false flag attack against the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo."<ref name=bamford/>


==Reaction== == Reaction ==
] gave his memorable speech at ], offering an olive branch to the Soviet Union in the form of a unilateral ] proposal]]
Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and it would now be the Joint Chiefs' turn to incur his displeasure. A JCS/Pentagon document (Ed Lansdale memo) dated 16 March 1962 titled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962 reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for U.S. intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on U.S. aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba."<ref>Lansdale Memo of 16 Mar 1962. This memo records a high-level meeting in the White House 3 days after McNamara was presented with Operation Northwoods. </ref> The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense, ], but was not implemented.


Kennedy rejected the Northwoods proposal. A JCS/Pentagon document, a memo by Lansdale entitled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962, reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for U.S. intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on U.S. aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S. so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba."<ref></ref> The proposal was sent for approval to the secretary of defense, ], but was not implemented.
Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became ] of ] in January 1963. American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the ].


Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became ] of ] in January 1963. U.S. military leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military. A rift had already developed during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the ] in October 1962 and flared up again with his June 10, 1963 announcement of a unilateral U.S. ].
On 3 August 2001, the ] (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such ] plans.<ref> '']'', 3 August 2001; also available .</ref>

Physical documentation on Operation Northwoods became declassified through the ]. This act declassified a total of four million documents, including Operation Northwoods, and was made available through the ] in ]. However, public knowledge of Operation Northwoods did not come until 2001 with the release of a book by the author James Bamford titled '']''.<ref>Davis, Tracy C. “Operation Northwoods: The Pentagon's Scripts for Overthrowing Castro.” TDR, vol. 50, no. 1, 2006, pp. 134–148. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4492663. Accessed 4 Mar. 2021.</ref>

On 3 August 2001, the ] (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/documentos/2001/ing/d030801i.html |title=Statement by the National Assembly of People's Power of the Republic of Cuba |publisher=] |date=3 August 2001}}; also available {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928050217/http://www.asanac.gov.cu/ASANAC/espanol/declaracion%20agosto2001.htm |date=2007-09-28 }}.</ref>


== See also == == See also ==
{{Portal|Government of the United States|Cuba|International relations}} {{Portal|United States|Politics|Cuba}}
* '']'' * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]


==References== == References ==
{{Reflist|2}} {{Reflist|2}}


==Further reading== == Further reading ==
* Jon Elliston, editor, ''Psywar on Cuba: The Declassified History of U.S. Anti-Castro Propaganda'' (Melbourne, Australia and New York: Ocean Press, 1999), ISBN 1-876175-09-5. * Jon Elliston, editor, ''Psywar on Cuba: The Declassified History of U.S. Anti-Castro Propaganda'' (Melbourne, Australia and New York: Ocean Press, 1999), {{ISBN|1-876175-09-5}}.
* James Bamford, ''Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency From the Cold War Through the Dawn of a New Century'' (New York: Doubleday, first edition, 24 April 2001), ISBN 0-385-49907-8. Here is an of this book.


==External links== == External links ==
{{Wikiquote}}
* in both ] and fully searchable ] format. * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081008062558/http://www.smeggys.co.uk/operation_northwoods.php |date=2008-10-08 }} in both ] and fully searchable ] format.
* High resolution scans from the , main pages: , , , , * High resolution scans from the , main pages: , , , ,
* Scott Shane and Tom Bowman with contribution from Laura Sullivan, ''Baltimore Sun'', 24 April 2001. * Scott Shane and Tom Bowman with contribution from Laura Sullivan, ''Baltimore Sun'', 24 April 2001.
* Ron Kampeas, ''Associated Press'' (''AP''), 25 April 2001. * Ron Kampeas, ''Associated Press'' (''AP''), 25 April 2001.
* Bruce Schneier, ''Salon.com'', 25 April 2001. * Bruce Schneier, ''Salon.com'', 25 April 2001.
* David Ruppe, ''ABC News'', 1 May 2001. * David Ruppe, ''ABC News'', 1 May 2001.
* ''Harper's Magazine'', July 2001. * ''Harper's Magazine'', July 2001.
* Chris Floyd, ''Moscow Times'', 21 December 2001, pg. VIII; also appeared in . * Chris Floyd, ''Moscow Times'', 21 December 2001, pg. VIII; also appeared in .
* National Security Archive, , April 30, 2001. * National Security Archive, , April 30, 2001.


{{Cuba-United States relations}} {{Cuba-United States relations}}

]
{{authority control}}

] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 20:01, 11 December 2024

1962 proposed US false flag operation against American citizens
Operation Northwoods memorandum (13 March 1962)
General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who was in charge as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation that originated within the US Department of Defense of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for CIA operatives to both stage and commit acts of terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blame them on the Cuban government, and use them to justify a war against Cuba. The possibilities detailed in the document included the remote control of civilian aircraft which would be secretly repainted as US Air Force planes, a fabricated 'shoot down' of a US Air Force fighter aircraft off the coast of Cuba, the possible assassination of Cuban immigrants, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, blowing up a U.S. ship, and orchestrating terrorism in U.S. cities. The proposals were rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

Fidel Castro had taken power in Cuba in 1959 and began allowing communists into the new Cuban government, nationalizing U.S. businesses and improving relations with the Soviet Union, arousing the concern of the U.S. military due to the Cold War. The operation proposed creating public support for a war against Cuba by blaming the Cuban government for terrorist acts that would be perpetrated by the U.S. government. To this end, Operation Northwoods proposals recommended hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of false evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:

The desired result from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.

Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The operation recommended developing a "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington", which involved the bombing of civilian targets, which was to be blamed on the Cuban government to paint a false image of Fidel Castro and misinform the American public.

The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the US government's anti-communist Cuban Project, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President Kennedy. None of the false flag operations became active under the auspices of the Operation Northwoods proposals.

Origins and public release

The main Operation Northwoods proposal was presented in a document titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)," a top secret collection of draft memoranda written by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS). The document was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on 13 March 1962 as a preliminary submission for planning purposes. The Joint Chiefs recommended that both the covert and overt aspects of any such operation be assigned to them. The previously secret document was originally made public on 18 November 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board, a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy's assassination. A total of 1,521 pages of once-secret military records covering 1962 to 1964 were concomitantly declassified by said Review Board.

"Appendix to Enclosure A" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" of the Northwoods document were first published online by the National Security Archive on 6 November 1998 in a joint venture with CNN as part of its 1998 Cold War television documentary series—specifically, as a documentation supplement to "Episode 10: Cuba," which aired on 29 November 1998. "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the document which contains the proposals to stage false flag terrorist attacks.

The Northwoods document was published online in a more complete form, including cover memoranda, by the National Security Archive on 30 April 2001.

Provocations

Responding to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document listed methods, such as false flag provocations, that the authors believed would garner support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. According to the documents, the plan called for several steps to be taken in an attempt to provoke Cuba into an action against the United States, then blame it for "hostilities" carried out by the U.S. against its military base at Guantanamo; these would be followed by executing offensive operations there against tactical Cuban civilian targets and military emplacements, leading to "large scale United States military operations":

  1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for U.S. military intervention in Cuba, a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as had been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
  2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.
  3. The United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
  4. Commence large scale United States military operations.

Related Operation Mongoose proposals

Main article: Operation Mongoose
General Edward Lansdale, commander of the anti-Cuban Operation Mongoose project

In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the U.S. Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals for actions to be taken against the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro.

Twelve of these proposals come from a 2 February 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.

The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a false flag plan to "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on U.S. facilities (GMO) in Cuba, thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."

It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, another false flag plot to blame Castro if the 1962 Mercury crewed space flight carrying John Glenn crashed, saying: "The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al. Cuba." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."

Even after General Lemnitzer lost his job as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Chiefs still planned false-flag pretext operations at least into 1963. A different U.S. Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the Organization of American States (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The U.S. Department of Defense document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS."

The plan expressed confidence that by this action, "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."

Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Since both were members of the British Commonwealth, the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro. As the U.S. Department of Defense report noted:

Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."

The U.S. Department of Defense report even suggested covertly paying a person in Castro's government to stage a false flag attack against the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo."

Reaction

In June 1963 President Kennedy gave his memorable speech at American University, offering an olive branch to the Soviet Union in the form of a unilateral Partial Nuclear Test Ban proposal

Kennedy rejected the Northwoods proposal. A JCS/Pentagon document, a memo by Lansdale entitled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962, reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for U.S. intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on U.S. aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S. so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba." The proposal was sent for approval to the secretary of defense, Robert McNamara, but was not implemented.

Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. U.S. military leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military. A rift had already developed during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962 and flared up again with his June 10, 1963 announcement of a unilateral U.S. Test Ban Treaty.

Physical documentation on Operation Northwoods became declassified through the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. This act declassified a total of four million documents, including Operation Northwoods, and was made available through the National Archives in College Park, Maryland. However, public knowledge of Operation Northwoods did not come until 2001 with the release of a book by the author James Bamford titled Body of Secrets.

On 3 August 2001, the National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.

See also

References

  1. ^ U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (13 March 1962). "Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)". U.S. Department of Defense.. The Operation Northwoods document in PDF format on the website of the independent, non-governmental research institute the National Security Archive at the George Washington University Gelman Library, Washington, D.C. Direct PDF links: here and here.
  2. ^ "U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba". ABC News. 7 January 2006.
  3. "1962 US Joint Chiefs Of Staff Operation Northwoods Unclassified Document Bolsheviks NWO". Internet Archive. 1962.
  4. "Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense. Subject: Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)" (PDF). The George Washington University. 13 March 1962. p. 11.
  5. Ruppe, David (May 1, 2001). "U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba". ABC News. Retrieved January 21, 2012.
  6. Jim Wolf, "Pentagon Planned 1960s Cuban 'Terror Campaign'," Reuters, 18 November 1997.
  7. ^ Mike Feinsilber, "At a tense time, plots abounded to humiliate Castro," Associated Press (AP), 18 November 1997; also available here.
  8. "The Records of the Assassination Records Review Board," National Archives and Records Administration.
  9. "Media Advisory: National Archives Releases Additional Materials Reviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board," Assassination Records Review Board (a division of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration), 17 November 1997. A U.S. government press-release announcing the declassification of some 1,500 pages of U.S. government documents from 1962 to 1964 relating to U.S. policy towards Cuba, among which declassified documents included the Operation Northwoods document.
  10. ^ Tim Weiner, "Documents Show Pentagon's Anti-Castro Plots During Kennedy Years," New York Times, 19 November 1997; appeared on the same date and by the same author in the New York Times itself as "Declassified Papers Show Anti-Castro Ideas Proposed to Kennedy," late edition—final, section A, pg. 25, column 1.
  11. "National Security Archive: Cold War: Documents," National Security Archive, 27 September 1998 – 24 January 1999.
  12. U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Appendix to Enclosure A: Memorandum for Chief of Operations, Cuba Project" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba," U.S. Department of Defense, c. March 1962. First published online by the National Security Archive on 6 November 1998, as part of CNN's Cold War documentary series. "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the Operation Northwoods document which contains the proposals to stage terrorist attacks.
  13. "Cold War Teacher Materials: Episodes," Archived 2007-01-26 at the Wayback Machine and "Educator Guide to CNN's Cold War Episode 10: Cuba," Archived 2007-01-26 at the Wayback Machine Turner Learning (Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.).
  14. "Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962," National Security Archive, 30 April 2001.
  15. "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba". media.nara.gov. Archived from the original on 2008-08-13. Retrieved 3 September 2009.
  16. Bohning, Don (2005). The Castro Obsession: U.S. Covert Operations Against Cuba, 1959-1965. Potomac Books. p. 105. ISBN 978-1-57488-675-7 – via Google Books.
  17. ^ Bamford, James (24 April 2001). "4: "Fists"". Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency From the Cold War Through the Dawn of a New Century (first ed.). New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-49907-8.
  18. Feinsilber, Mike (29 January 1998). "Records Show Plan To Provoke Castro". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2005-08-24.
  19. Lansdale Memo of 16 Mar 1962. This memo records a high-level meeting in the White House three days after McNamara was presented with Operation Northwoods.
  20. Davis, Tracy C. “Operation Northwoods: The Pentagon's Scripts for Overthrowing Castro.” TDR, vol. 50, no. 1, 2006, pp. 134–148. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4492663. Accessed 4 Mar. 2021.
  21. "Statement by the National Assembly of People's Power of the Republic of Cuba". National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba. 3 August 2001.; also available here Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine.

Further reading

  • Jon Elliston, editor, Psywar on Cuba: The Declassified History of U.S. Anti-Castro Propaganda (Melbourne, Australia and New York: Ocean Press, 1999), ISBN 1-876175-09-5.

External links

Cuba Cuba–United States relations United States
Diplomatic posts
Diplomacy
Conflicts
Incidents
Legislation
Related
Category:Cuba–United States relations
Categories: