Misplaced Pages

Thai Forest Tradition: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:41, 17 June 2015 editJohn of Reading (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers766,015 editsm Removed cut+pasted default caption or alt text from image using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:55, 22 December 2024 edit undoYeshu972 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,518 editsm Fixed grammarTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source 
(608 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Lineage of Theravada Buddhist monasticism}}
], ], ], ], Ajahn Khamdee Pabhaso, Ajahn Liem Thitadhammo<br/><br/>Right: ], ], Ajahn Dune Atulo, Mae Chi Kaew, Ajahn Sim Buddhacaro, Ajahn Pannavaddho, ]]]
{{For|the meditation practices called ''Kammaṭṭhāna'' ("Place of work")|Kammaṭṭhāna}}

{{Multiple issues|
{{Disputed|date=November 2019}}
{{Misleading|article|date=June 2020}}
}}
{{Infobox {{Infobox
| title = Thai Forest Tradition (Dhutanga Kammatthana) | title = Thai Forest Tradition
| image = ] | image = ]
| size = 285px | size = 220px
| label1 = Type
| data1 = ]
| label2 = School
| data2 = ]
| label3 = Formation
| data3 = c. 1900; ], ]
| label4 = Lineage Heads
| data4 =
* ], ]{{smalldiv|{{align|center|(c. 1900–1949)}}}}
* ] Desaransi<br />{{smalldiv|{{align|center|(1949–1994)}}}}
* ] Ñāṇasampaṇṇo<br />{{smalldiv|{{align|center|(1994–2011)}}}}
{{hr}}
* ] Subhatto<br />{{smalldiv|(''see: ]'')}}
| label6 = Founding Maxims
| data6 = The customs of the ] (''ariyavamsa'')<br />
The ] in accordance with the Dhamma (''dhammanudhammapatipatti'')
}}
{{Thai Forest Tradition}}
{{Theravada Buddhism|Traditions}}


The '''Kammaṭṭhāna Forest Tradition of Thailand''' (from {{langx|pi|kammaṭṭhāna}} {{IPA-all|kəmːəʈʈʰaːna|}} meaning ]), commonly known in the West as the '''Thai Forest Tradition''', is a ] of ] ].
| label1 = Column 1:
| data1 =


The Thai Forest Tradition started around 1900 with ] Bhuridatto, who wanted to practice Buddhist monasticism and its meditative practices, according to the ] standards of ]. After studying with ] and wandering through the northeast of Thailand, Ajahn Mun reportedly became a ] and started to teach in Northeast Thailand. He strove for a revival of the ], insisting on a strict observance of the Buddhist monastic code known as the ] and teaching the practice of '']'' and the realization of '']''.
| label2 = Column 2:
| data2 =


Initially, Ajahn Mun's teachings were met with fierce opposition, but in the 1930s his group was acknowledged as a formal faction of Thai Buddhism, and in the 1950s the relationship with the royal and religious establishment improved. In the 1960s, Western students started to be attracted to the movement, and in the 1970s branch monasteries of the tradition began to be established in the West.
| label3 = Formation
| data3 = c. 1900 ; ], ]


Underlying attitudes of the Thai Forest Tradition include an interest in the empirical effectiveness of practice, the individual's development, and the use of skill in their practice and living.{{Citation needed|reason=I don't see mention of this elsewhere in the article|date=April 2021}}
| label4 = Key People
| data4 = ], Phra Ajahn<br/>], Phra Ajahn<br/>], Phra Ajahn


==History==
}}
{{Main|History of the Thai Forest Tradition}}


===The Dhammayut movement (19th century)===
The '''Kammatthana Forest tradition of Thailand''' (from ]: 'kammaṭṭhāna' {{IPA-sa|'käməʈänä|}}, meaning 'meditation subject' , see ]), commonly known in the West as the '''Thai Forest Tradition''', is a ] meditation lineage<ref>"Kammatthana." "A Glossary of Pali and Buddhist Terms". Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 17 December 2013, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/glossary.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> which emerged from a modern revival of the ] of ].<ref> J.L. Taylor, Forest Monks and the Nation-State (Singapore: ISEAS 1993).</ref> Practitioners find seclusion in the wilderness or sparsely populated areas as an aid to ].<ref>''The Mindful Way - Buddhist Monks of the Forest Tradition in Thailand with Ajahn Chah ''.BBC Open University . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Anf1yhX9VQo (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> Kammatthana practice emphasizes the cultivation of ],<ref>"Buddhist Meditation", by Francis Story, (The Anagarika Sugatananda). Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 24 November 2013, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/story/bl015.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> and the tradition's adherents assert the absolute necessity of ] to develop both ] and ].<ref>''Jhana Not by the Numbers'', by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 13 July 2012, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/jhananumbers.html (retrieved May 02, 2015) .</ref><ref>"Ajaan Sao's Teaching: A Reminiscence of Phra Ajaan Sao Kantasilo", transcribed from a talk by Phra Ajaan Phut Thaniyo, translated from the Thai by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 2 November 2013, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/phut/sao.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref><ref>''Different Views on Vipassana Meditation ''.Ajahn Sona . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Nm-hoPy5Ag (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> In addition to these, the tradition gives a strong weight to scrupulous ],<ref>''Patipada: Venerable Acariya Mun's Path of Practice'', by Maha Bua Nyanasampanno. Chapter XVI: The Customs of Kammatthana Bhikkhus. Wisdom Library. December 21, 2010. http://www.wisdomlib.org/buddhism/book/patipada/d/doc4238.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> and has a reputation for strict adherence to ].<ref> J.L. Taylor, Forest Monks and the Nation-State (Singapore: ISEAS 1993).</ref>
{{See also|History of Thailand}}
{{Page needed|date=May 2015}}<ref>Forest Recollections: Wandering Monks in Twentieth-Century Thailand, by Kamala Tiyavanich. University of Hawaii Press, The (1st edition). April 1997.</ref>{{Page needed|date=May 2015}}


Before authority was centralized in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the region known today as ] was a kingdom of semi-autonomous city-states (Thai: '']''). These kingdoms were all ruled by a hereditary local governor, and while independent, paid tribute to Bangkok, the most powerful central city-state in the region. Each region had its own religious customs according to local tradition, and substantially different forms of Buddhism existed between mueangs. Though all of these local flavors of regional Thai Buddhism evolved their own customary elements relating to local spirit lore, all were shaped
The Kammatthana tradition began circa 1900<ref>"Theravada Buddhism: A Chronology". Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 30 November 2013, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/history.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> as a grassroots movement led by ] and ].<ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> Disillusioned with an increasingly scholastic culture being imposed on the Thai ] by state religious authorities under ], Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Sao both took to the rural frontier of ]. Their departure from the ecclesiastical mainstream was — initially — a rejection of the popular notion held by their contemporaries that the ] to ] was lost to mankind.<ref>''Venerable Ācariya Mun Bhuridatta Thera: A Spiritual Biography''. Ajahn Maha Boowa Nanasampanno. Forest Dhamma Books. May 2004.</ref>
by the infusion of ] and ] traditions, which arrived in the area prior to the fourteenth century. Additionally, many of the monastics in the villages engaged in behavior inconsistent with the Buddhist monastic code (Pali: ''vinaya''), including playing ]s, and participating in boat races and water fights.{{CN|date=July 2023}}
] of the ], founder of the ]]]
In the 1820s young Prince ] (1804–1866), the future fourth king of the ] (Siam), was ordained as a Buddhist monk before rising to the throne later in his life. He traveled around the Siamese region and quickly became dissatisfied with the caliber of Buddhist practice he saw around him. He was also concerned about the authenticity of the ordination lineages, and the capacity of the monastic body to act as an agent that generates positive kamma (Pali: ''puññakkhettam'', meaning "merit-field").


Mongkut started to introduce innovations and reforms to a small number of monks, inspired by his contacts with Western intellectuals.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" /> He rejected the local customs and traditions, and instead turned to the Pali Canon, studying the texts and developing his own ideas on them.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" /> Doubting the validity of the existing lineages, Mongkut searched for a lineage of monks with an authentic practice, which he found among the Burmese ] in the region. He reordained among this group, which formed the basis for the Dhammayut movement.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" /> Mongkut then searched for replacements for the classical Buddhist texts lost in the final siege of Ayutthaya. He eventually received copies of the Pali Canon as part of a missive to Sri Lanka.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2010}} With these, Mongkut began a study group to promote understanding of Classical Buddhist principles.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" />
As word spread of Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Sao's nonconformist endeavor, like-minded monks left their stations in the cities to study from them, many travelling long distances and enduring great hardships.<ref>Forest Recollections: Wandering Monks in Twentieth-Century Thailand, by Kamala Tiyavanich. University of Hawaii Press, The (1st edition). April 1997.</ref><ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> These meditation masters of the Kammatthana tradition, known as the Forest Ajahns,<ref>''Book Review: "Forest Recollections"''. Kamala Tiyavanich. U. of Hawaii Press. 1997. retrieved May 02, 2015 from http://www.arrowriver.ca/dhamma/ForestRec.html .</ref> are known for rumors of their ] abilities,<ref>http://www.thaiworldview.com/bouddha/bouddha6.htm</ref> and respected for their reputations for ].<ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref>


Mongkut's reforms were radical, imposing a scriptural orthodoxy on the varied forms of Thai Buddhism of the time, "trying to establish a national identity through religious reform."<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" />{{refn|group=note|name="Sujato_orthodoxy"|Sujato: "Mongkut and those following him have been accused of imposing a scriptural orthodoxy on the diversity of Thai Buddhist forms. There is no doubt some truth to this. It was a form of ‘inner colonialism’, the modern, Westernized culture of Bangkok trying to establish a national identity through religious reform.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" />}} A controversial point was Mongkut's belief that nibbana can't be reached in our degenerated times and that the aim of the Buddhist order is to promote a moral way of life and preserve the Buddhist traditions.<ref name="Thanissaro1998">Thanissaro (1998), , TriCycle</ref><ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" />{{refn|group=note|name="Mongkut_nibbana"|Mongkut on nibbana:<br />Thanissaro: "Mongkut himself was convinced that the path to nirvana was no longer open, but that a great deal of merit could be made by reviving at least the outward forms of the earliest Buddhist traditions."<ref name="Thanissaro1998" /><br />* Sujato: "One area where the modernist thinking of Mongkut has been very controversial has been his belief that in our degenerate age, it is impossible to realize the paths and fruits of Buddhism. Rather than aiming for any transcendental goal, our practice of Buddhadhamma is in order to support mundane virtue and wisdom, to uphold the forms and texts of Buddhism. This belief, while almost unheard of in the West, is very common in modern Theravada. It became so mainstream that at one point any reference to Nibbana was removed from the Thai ordination ceremony.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" />}}
In the second half of the 20th century the Kammatthana tradition took root in the West, having attracted the most Western students of any wilderness meditation tradition.<ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> In spite of deforestation in Thailand, Kammatthana practice continues on the outskirts of cities.<ref>''Forest Recollections: Wandering Monks in Twentieth-Century Thailand'', by Kamala Tiyavanich. University of Hawaii Press, The (1st edition). April 1997.</ref> Visitors come to study meditation under the guidance of these forest practitioners in the seclusion offered in forest monasteries.<ref>''The Buddha Comes to Sussex ''. Everyman . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JznA4ueq2vE (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref> ] writes: "Kammatthana monks came to represent, in the eyes of many monastics and lay people, a solid and reliable expression of the ] in a world of fast and furious modernization."<ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html (retrieved May 02, 2015).</ref>
{{Thai Forest Tradition}}


Mongkut's brother ], King Rama III, the third king of the ], considered Mongkut's involvement with the Mons, an ethnic minority, to be improper, and built a monastery on the outskirts of Bangkok. In 1836, Mongkut became the first abbot of ], which would become the administrative center of the Thammayut order until the present day.{{sfn|Buswell|Lopez|2013|p=696}}{{sfn|Tambiah|1984|p=156}}
==History==


The early participants of the movement continued to devote themselves to a combination of textual study and meditations they had discovered from the texts they had received. However, Thanissaro notes that none of the monks could make any claims of having successfully entered meditative concentration (Pali: ''samadhi''), much less having reached a noble level.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2010}}
===Introduction===
{{See also|Early Buddhism|Theravada Buddhism}}
] itself began as a forest tradition. The Buddha ] in a forest, and throughout his life his teachings were at odds with what established ] priests were teaching. While the Buddha was alive, he mentioned that the ] would only survive in the world incorrupted for 500 years, after which point if one wished to reach ]ship they would have to tease out the impurities themselves, and fill in the blanks of the aspects of the Dhamma which had been lost through their own efforts.<ref>http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/CrossIndexed/Uncollected/MiscEssays/The%20Traditions%20of%20the%20Noble%20Ones.pdf</ref>


The Dhammayut reform movement maintained a strong footing as Mongkut later rose to the throne. Over the next several decades the Dhammayut monks would continue with their study and practice.
Since then, the caliber of monastic practice in ] Buddhism has followed a cycle. As monastic practice grows lax in a Buddhist region, the governing body of that region may bring more disciplined monks in from another region to elevate the level of practice,<ref>http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/CrossIndexed/Uncollected/MiscEssays/The%2520Traditions%2520of%2520the%2520Noble%2520Ones.pdf&sa=U&ei=b5NWVY6GKMeiyATWqYHoAw&ved=0CB8QFjAC&usg=AFQjCNFGgI1qXua2NI72eq0ufAN-xl9P2Q</ref> or one or more individuals may disengage from the larger ] to revive the spirit of the Buddha's teaching.<ref>The Customs of the Noble Ones, Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy).</ref>


===Formative period (around 1900)===
The tradition grew out of a reform movement known as the ] (literally: In accordance with the Dhamma) order. Dhammayut was an attempt to renovate the existing Thai Customary Buddhism, which was so infused with Thai folk beliefs as to not be recognizable as what the Buddha actually taught. While the greater Dhammayut order was primarily concerned with academic reflection, ] and ] — the two monks who began the tradition — were more concerned with the practices that the ] outlined as leading to ].
The Kammaṭṭhāna Forest Tradition started around 1900 with ] Bhuridatto, who studied with ], and wanted to practice Buddhist monasticism, and its meditative practices, according to the ] standards of ], which Ajahn Mun termed "the customs of the noble ones".


====Wat Liap monastery and Fifth Reign reforms====
Because of this difference, the Kammatthana tradition has been organizationally defined throughout its history by its relationship with ]. Pioneers of the Kammatthana tradition lived at a time of ], and would experience alienation throughout this process for giving priority to classical Buddhist practice. For the better part of a century the tradition battled to maintain it's niche among a myriad of flavors of Buddhism in the region, all during precarious times for the region as a whole: ] when the state's urgent priority was uniting Thailand as a nation to face imminent threats of ].
While ordained in the Dhammayut movement, Ajahn Sao (1861–1941) questioned the impossibility to attain nibbana.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" /> He rejected the textual orientation of the Dhammayut movement and set out to bring the ''dhamma'' into actual practice.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" /> In the late nineteenth century he was posted as abbot of Wat Liap, in Ubon. According to Phra Ajahn Phut Thaniyo, one of Ajahn Sao's students, Ajahn Sao was "not a preacher or a speaker, but a doer," who said very little when teaching his students. He taught his students to "Meditate on the word 'Buddho,'" which would aid in developing concentration and mindfulness of meditation objects.<ref name="Thaniyo" group="web">Phra Ajaan Phut Thaniyo, , translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu</ref>{{refn|group=note|Phra Ajaan Phut Thaniyo gives an incomplete account of the meditation instructions of Ajaan Sao. According to Thaniyo, concentration on the word 'Buddho' would make the mind "calm and bright" by entering into concentration.<ref name="Thaniyo" group="web" /> He warned his students not to settle for an empty and still mind, but to "focus on the breath as your object and then simply keep track of it, following it inward until the mind becomes even calmer and brighter." This leads to "threshold concentration" (''upacara samadhi''), and culminates in "fixed penetration" (''appana samadhi''), an absolute stillness of mind, in which the awareness of the body disappears, leaving the mind to stand on its own. Reaching this point, the practitioner has to notice when the mind starts to become distracted and focus on the movement of distraction. Thaniyo does not further elaborate.<ref name="Thaniyo" group="web" />}}


Ajahn Mun (1870–1949) went to Wat Liap monastery immediately after being ordained in 1893, where he started to practice ]-meditation, in which awareness is directed away from the body. While it leads to a state of ], it also leads to visions and out-of-body experiences.{{sfn|Tambiah|1984|p=84}} He then turned to his keeping awareness of his body at all times,{{sfn|Tambiah|1984|p=84}} taking full sweeps of the body through a walking meditation practice,{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2014}} which leads to a more satisfactory state of calm-abiding.{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2014}}
===Establishment of the Dhammayut Order===
] of the ], founder of the Dhammayuttika Nikaya]]
{{Main|Dhammayutika Nikaya}}
{{see also|Rama IV}}
The Dhammayuttika Nikaya or Thammayut began in 1833 as a reform movement led by Prince Mongkut, son of King Rama II of Siam. It remained a reform movement until passage of the Sangha Act of 1902, which formally recognized it as the lesser of Thailand's two Theravada denominations.<ref>, Prof. Phra Thepsophon, Rector of Mahachulalongkorn Buddhist University. Speech at the International Conference on Buddhasasana in Theravada Buddhist countries: Issue and The Way Forward in Colombo, Sri Lanka, January 15, 2003, Buddhism in Thailand, Dhammathai - Buddhist Information Network</ref>


{{multiple image|caption_align=center
Prince Mongkut was a bhikkhu (ordination name: Vajirañāṇo) for 27 years (1824–1851) before becoming the King of Siam (1851–1868). After the then 20-year-old prince entered monastic life in 1824, he noticed what he saw as serious discrepancies between the rules given in the Pāli Canon and the actual practices of Thai bhikkhus and sought to upgrade monastic discipline to make it more orthodox.
<!-- Essential parameters -->
| align = <!-- right (default), left, center, none --> right
| direction = <!-- horizontal (default), vertical -->
| background color = <!-- box background -->


<!-- Header -->
Desiring a deeper practice, Prince Mongkut reordained among the ]. ] complained about his involvement with an ethnic minority, so a monastery was built for Prince Mongkut on the border of the state of Bangkok. This was at a time when the region that is now Thailand was a loosely organized group of city-states.
| header_background =
| header_align = <!-- center (default), left, right -->
| header =


<!-- Images -->
In 1836 he became the first abbot of Wat Bowonniwet Vihara. Mongkut also made an effort to remove all non-Buddhist, folk religious, and superstitious elements which over the years had become part of Thai Buddhism.<ref>, Buddhism in Thailand, Dhammathai - Buddhist Information Network</ref> Dhammayut bhikkhus were expected to eat only one meal a day (not two) and the meal was to be gathered during a traditional alms round.
| total_width = 360
<!--image 1-->
| image1 = Portrait of Ajahn Mun2.jpg
| width1 = 2905
| height1 = 3441
| alt1 =
| link1 =
| caption1 =
<!--image 2-->
| image2 = Portrait of Ajahn Sao.jpg
| width2 = 360
| height2 = 450
| alt2 =
| link2 =
| caption2 =
<!-- and so on, to a maximum of 10 images (image10) -->


<!-- Footer -->
===Ajahn Mun's Search===
| footer_background =
Originally ordained in a local monks order which practiced a flavor of Buddhism infused with traditional Thai folk beliefs, ] reordained in the Dhammayut order.
| footer_align = <!-- left (default), center, right -->
| footer = ] Bhuridatto (left) and ] (right), founders of the Kammatthana Forest lineage.
}}


During this time, ] (1853–1910), the fifth monarch of the ], and his brother Prince Wachirayan, initiated a cultural modernization of the entire region. This modernization included an ongoing campaign to homogenize Buddhism among the villages.{{sfn|Taylor|p=62}} Chulalongkorn and Wachiraayan were taught by Western tutors and held distaste for the more mystical aspects of Buddhism.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2005|p=11}}{{refn|group=note|Thanissaro: "Both Rama V and Prince Vajirañana were trained by European tutors, from whom they had absorbed Victorian attitudes toward rationality, the critical study of ancient texts, the perspective of secular history on the nature of religious institutions, and the pursuit of a “useful” past. As Prince Vajirañana stated in his Biography of the Buddha, ancient texts, such as the Pali Canon, are like mangosteens, with a sweet flesh and bitter rind. The duty of critical scholarship was to extract the flesh and discard the rind. Norms of rationality were the guide to this extraction process. Teachings that were reasonable and useful to modern needs were accepted as the flesh. Stories of miracles and psychic powers were dismissed as part of the rind.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2005|p=11}}}} They abandoned Mongkut's search for the ''noble attainments'', indirectly stating that the noble attainments were no longer possible. In an introduction to the Buddhist monastic code written by Wachirayan, he stated that the rule forbidding monks to make claims to superior attainments was no longer relevant.{{sfn|Taylor|p=141}}
Ultimately not satisfied with Dhammayut's scholastic ideal, Ajahn Mun left the wat of his preceptor and went to study with Ajahn Sao Kantasilo in a small monastery just outside of the town.


During this time, the Thai government enacted legislation to group these factions into official monastic fraternities. The monks ordained as part of the Dhammayut reform movement were now part of the Dhammayut order, and all remaining regional monks were grouped together as the Mahanikai order.
Studying for several years with Ajahn Sao, Ajahn Mun left on his own in search of any teacher who may have found the noble attainments, travelling as far as Laos and Burma, as well as central Thailand. Thanissaro Bhikkhu writes:
]
{{quote|In the long course of his wilderness training, Ajaan Mun learned that — contrary to Reform and Customary beliefs — the path to nirvana was not closed. The true Dhamma was to be found not in old customs or texts but in the well-trained heart and mind. The texts were pointers for training, nothing more or less. The rules of the Vinaya, instead of simply being external customs, played an important role in physical and mental survival. As for the Dhamma texts, practice was not just a matter of confirming what they said. Reading and thinking about the texts could not give an adequate understanding of what they meant — and did not count as showing them true respect. True respect for the texts meant taking them as a challenge: putting their teachings seriously to the test to see if, in fact, they are true. In the course of testing the teachings, the mind would come to many unexpected realizations that were not contained in the texts. These in turn had to be put to the test as well, so that one learned gradually by trial and error to the point of an actual noble attainment. Only then, Ajaan Mun would say, did one understand the Dhamma.}}


====Wandering non-returner====
===A Grassroots Following===
After his stay at Wat Liap, Ajaan Mun wandered through the Northeast.{{sfn|Tambiah|1984|p=84}}{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2004}} Ajahn Mun still had visions,{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2004}}{{refn|group=note|Maha Bua: "Sometimes, he felt his body soaring high into the sky where he traveled around for many hours, looking at celestial mansions before coming back down. At other times, he burrowed deep beneath the earth to visit various regions in hell. There he felt profound pity for its unfortunate inhabitants, all experiencing the grievous consequences of their previous actions. Watching these events unfold, he often lost all perspective of the passage of time. In those days, he was still uncertain whether these scenes were real or imaginary. He said that it was only later on, when his spiritual faculties were more mature, that he was able to investigate these matters and understand clearly the definite moral and psychological causes underlying them.{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2004}}}} when his concentration and mindfulness were lost, but through trial and error he eventually found a method for taming his mind.{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2004}}
]
In the years following Ajahn Mun's arahantship, he attracted a following of monks desiring a more disciplined approach to Buddhist practice. Ajahn Mun's style of teaching has been described as "a warrior's approach",<ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html .</ref> putting his students in situations where they would develop practical skills needed to advance on the path. Rather than a single meditation technique, he taught skills that related to meditation practice.


As his mind gained more inner stability, he gradually headed towards Bangkok, consulting his childhood friend Chao Khun Upali on practices pertaining to the development of insight (Pali: ''paññā'', also meaning "wisdom" or "discernment"). He then left for an unspecified period, staying in caves in Lopburi, before returning to Bangkok one final time to consult with Chao Khun Upali, again pertaining to the practice of paññā.{{sfn|Tambiah|1984|pp=86–87}}
At this time, a new state religion was in development that was a compromise between Customary Buddhism and the Dhammayut's Reform Buddhism. The Dhammayut monks, being the best educated, were drafted to teach a new Bangkok curriculum based on "Victorian notions of reason and utility"<ref>"The Customs of the Noble Ones", by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (Legacy Edition), 7 June 2010, http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html .</ref> in outlying areas.


Feeling confident in his paññā practice he left for Sarika Cave. During his stay there, Ajahn Mun was critically ill for several days. After medicines failed to remedy his illness, Ajahn Mun ceased to take medication and resolved to rely on the power of his Buddhist practice. Ajahn Mun investigated the nature of the mind and this pain, until his illness disappeared, and successfully coped with visions featuring a club-wielding demon apparition who claimed he was the owner of the cave. According to forest tradition accounts, Ajahn Mun attained the noble level of ''non-returner'' (Pali: "anagami") after subduing this apparition and working through subsequent visions he encountered in the cave.{{sfn|Tambiah|1984|pp=87–88}}
===Respect Among the Mainstream===
Tension between the forest tradition and the Dhammayut administrative hierarchy escalated in 1926, when Somdet Mahawirawong (Tisso Uan) ordered Ajahn Sing Khantiyagamo and his following of 50 monks and 100 nuns and laypeople to leave a forest under Tisso Uan's jusrisdiction.


===Establishment and resistance (1900s–1930s)===
This changed in the 1950's, when Tisso Uan had become ill. When Ajahn Lee Dhammadaro had come to visit him one day, he simply walked in and sat quietly in a corner of the room. When asked by Tisso Uan what he was doing, he said 'giving you a gift of stillness'.


====Establishment====
In the following months Tisso Uan recovered, and a friendship between Tisso Uan and Ajahn Lee began that would cause Tisso Uan to completely reverse his opinion of the Kammatthana tradition. In his autobiography, Ajahn Lee Dhammadaro talks about his time teaching Tisso Uan:


Ajahn Mun returned to the Northeast to start teaching, which marked the effective beginning of the Kammatthana tradition. He insisted on a scrupulous observance of the ''Vinaya'', the Buddhist monastic code, and of the protocols, the instructions for the daily activities of the monk. He taught that virtue was a matter of the mind, not of rituals, and that intention forms the essence of virtue, not the proper conduct of rituals.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
{{quote|From then on I never had to give him any more long talks. As soon as I’d say two or three words, he’d understand what I was referring to. As for me, I was pleased. One day he said, ‘People who study and practice the Dhamma get caught up on nothing more than their own opinions, which is why they never get anywhere. If everyone understood things correctly, there wouldn’t be anything impossible about practicing the Dhamma.’
He asserted that meditative concentration was necessary on the Buddhist path and that the practice of jhana{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}} and the experience of Nirvana was still possible even in modern times.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}


====Resistance====
As I spent the rains there with the Somdet, my mind was at ease as far as having to
{{expand section|date=November 2018}}
explain things to him was concerned. He told me, ‘In the past I never thought that practicing samadhi was in any way necessary.’ Then he added, ‘The monks and novice—and
<!-- So, Mun started teaching, and then? When did he start teaching? Did he initiate a full-blown monastic organization? What happened? JJ, 4 Nov. 2018 -->
the laypeople as well—haven’t benefited enough from having you here. If you can, I’d like you to find the time to teach them too.’}}


Ajahn Mun's approach met with resistance from the religious establishment.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" /> He challenged the text-based approach of the city-monks, opposing their claims about the non-attainability of '']'' and '']'' with his own experience-based teachings.<ref name="Sujato_Reform" group="web" />
From that point on the Kammatthana tradition would have advocacy among the Dhammayut administration.


His report of having reached a noble attainment was met with mixed reactions among the Thai clergy. The ecclesiastical official Ven. Chao Khun Upali held Ajahn Mun in high esteem, which would be a significant factor in the subsequent leeway that state authorities gave him and his students. Tisso Uan (1867–1956), who later rose to Thailand's highest ecclesiastical rank of ''somdet,'' thoroughly rejected the authenticity of Ajahn Mun's attainment.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
===Cold War Period===
{{See also|Persecution of Buddhists|Deforestation in Thailand}}


The tension between the forest tradition and the Thammayut administrative hierarchy escalated in 1926 when Tisso Uan attempted to drive a senior Forest Tradition monk named Ajahn Sing—along with his following of 50 monks and 100 nuns and laypeople—out of ], which was under Tisso Uan's jurisdiction. Ajahn Sing refused, saying he and many of his supporters were born there, and they weren't doing anything to harm anyone. After arguments with district officials, the directive was eventually dropped.{{sfn|Taylor|1993|p=137}}
====Red Scare====
Tensions arose between the ] and a newly formed ]. During this period, several if not all of the major figures in the Kammatthana tradition alive at the time were accused of ].


===Institutionalisation and growth (1930s–1990s)===
Ajahn Juan talks about his encounter with a border patrol agent in 1962:


====Acceptance in Bangkok====
{{blockquote| "What's a communist like ? " Juan asked the policeman who was probing him for possible pro-communist sentiments.<br/>
In the late 1930s, Tisso Uan formally recognized the Kammaṭṭhāna monks as a faction. However, even after Ajahn Mun died in 1949, Tisso Uan continued to insist that Ajahn Mun had never been qualified to teach because he hadn't graduated from the government's formal Pali studies courses.
"Among communists there is no religion, no suffering, no rich people. Everyone is equal. No private property. Only communal property," replied the policeman.<br/>
"What kind of clothes do they wear? What do they eat? Do they have a wife and children? " asked the monk.<br/>
"Yes, they have a family. They eat normal food. They wear shirts and trousers like villagers. "<br/>
"How often do they eat? " Juan asked.<br/>
"Three times a day."<br/>
"Do they shave their heads?"<br/>
"No."<br/>
"So," Juan concluded, " If a communist has a wife and children, wears a shirt and trousers, eats three meals a day, does not shave his head, and carries a weapon" then how can I, who have neither a wife nor children, eat once a day, shave my head, wear robes and carry no weapon be a communist?"}}


With the passing of Ajahn Mun in 1949, ] Desaransi was designated the ''de facto'' head of the Forest Tradition until his death in 1994. The relationship between the Thammayut ecclesia and the Kammaṭṭhāna monks changed in the 1950s when Tisso Uan become ill and Ajahn Lee went to teach meditation to him to help cope with his illness.{{sfn|Lee Dhammadaro|2012}}{{refn|group=note|Ajahn Lee: "One day he said, "I never dreamed that sitting in ''samadhi'' would be so beneficial, but there's one thing that has me bothered. To make the mind still and bring it down to its basic resting level (''bhavanga''): Isn't this the essence of becoming and birth?"<br /><br />"That's what ''samadhi'' is," I told him, "becoming and birth."<br /><br />"But the Dhamma we're taught to practice is for the sake of doing away with becoming and birth. So what are we doing giving rise to more becoming and birth?"<br /><br />"If you don't make the mind take on becoming, it won't give rise to knowledge, because knowledge has to come from becoming if it's going to do away with becoming. This is becoming on a small scale—''uppatika bhava''—which lasts for a single mental moment. The same holds true with birth. To make the mind still so that samadhi arises for a long mental moment is birth. Say we sit in concentration for a long time until the mind gives rise to the five factors of jhana: That's birth. If you don't do this with your mind, it won't give rise to any knowledge of its own. And when knowledge can't arise, how will you be able to let go of unawareness ? It'd be very hard.<br /><br />"As I see it," I went on, "most students of the Dhamma really misconstrue things. Whatever comes springing up, they try to cut it down and wipe it out. To me, this seems wrong. It's like people who eat eggs. Some people don't know what a chicken is like: This is unawareness. As soon as they get hold of an egg, they crack it open and eat it. But say they know how to incubate eggs. They get ten eggs, eat five of them and incubate the rest. While the eggs are incubating, that's "becoming." When the baby chicks come out of their shells, that's "birth." If all five chicks survive, then as the years pass it seems to me that the person who once had to buy eggs will start benefiting from his chickens. He'll have eggs to eat without having to pay for them, and if he has more than he can eat he can set himself up in business, selling them. In the end, he'll be able to release himself from poverty.<br /><br />"So it is with practicing ''samadhi'': If you're going to release yourself from becoming, you first have to go live in becoming. If you're going to release yourself from birth, you'll have to know all about your own birth."{{sfn|Lee Dhammadaro|2012}}}}
====Deforestation====
]
]
Tisso Uan eventually recovered, and a friendship between Tisso Uan and Ajahn Lee began, that would cause Tisso Uan to reverse his opinion of the Kammaṭṭhāna tradition, inviting Ajahn Lee to teach in the city. This event marked a turning point in relations between the Dhammayut administration and the Forest Tradition, and interest continued to grow as a friend of Ajahn Maha Bua's named ] rose to the level of ''somdet'' and later the Sangharaja of Thailand. Additionally, the clergy who had been drafted as teachers from the Fifth Reign onwards were now being displaced by civilian teaching staff, which left the Dhammayut monks with a crisis of identity.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2005}}{{sfn|Taylor|p=139}}
In the last half of the 20th century, the vast majority of Thailand's rainforest were lost. Millions of villagers in the forest were (sometimes violently) driven from their homes as villages were bulldozed over to make room for eucalyptus plantations.


====Recording of forest doctrine====
Kamala Tiyanavich writes:
{{Main|Ajahn Lee}}


In the tradition's beginning the founders famously neglected to record their teachings, instead wandering the Thai countryside offering individual instruction to dedicated pupils. However, detailed meditation manuals and treatises on Buddhist doctrine emerged in the late 20th century from Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Sao's first-generation students as the Forest tradition's teachings began to propagate among the urbanities in Bangkok and subsequently take root in the West.
{{quote|The final closure of the forest began after devastating floods
occurred in southern Thailand. In November 1988 floods and
landslides, triggered by rain falling on denuded hillsides, wiped
out several southern villages and killed hundreds of people. For
the first time the Bangkok government was forced to face the con
sequences of uncontrolled exploitation of the forest. Responding
to an intense public outcry, the government suspended and later
b anned all logging activities in the country. It is no surprise that
such ecological disasters have struck Thailand. Three decades of
rapacious land clearing had wiped out 82 percent of Thailand's
forests, and in places the countryside had become a dust bowl.
In this context, many wandering monks decided that they had to
hold their ground when they found a suitable forest. They knew
that if they retreated, they risked losing it forever.}}


], one of Ajahn Mun's students, was instrumental in disseminating Mun's teachings to a wider Thai lay audience. Ajahn Lee wrote several books which recorded the doctrinal positions of the forest tradition and explained broader Buddhist concepts in the Forest Tradition's terms. Ajahn Lee and his students are considered a distinguishable sub-lineage that is sometimes referred to as the "] Line". An influential Western student in the line of Ajahn Lee is ].
Forest monks in Thailand were on the front line in the battle against logging companies and eucalyptus farmers to preserve Thailand's rainforests. In spite of their efforts the areas around what were once forest wats in wilderness areas have now been largely developed.


'''<big>Forest monasteries in the South</big>'''
Thanissaro Bhikkhu writes:
]
Ajahn ] (May 27, 1906 - May 25, 1993) became a Buddhist monk at Wat Ubon, Chaiya, ] in Thailand on July 29, 1926, when he was twenty years old, in part to follow the tradition of the day and to fulfill his mother’s wishes. His preceptor gave him the Buddhist name “Inthapanyo” which means “The wise one”. He was a Mahanikaya monk and graduated at the third level of Dharma studies in his hometown and in Pali language studies at the third level in Bangkok. After he finished learning the Pali language, he realized that living in Bangkok was not suitable for him because monks and people there did not practice to achieve the heart and core of Buddhism. So he decided to go back to Surat Thani and practice rigorously and taught people to practice well according to the core teachings of the Buddha. Then he established Suanmokkhabālārama (The Grove of the Power of Liberation) in 1932 which is the mountain and forest for 118.61 acres at Pum Riang, Chaiya district, Surat Thani Thailand. It is a forest Dhamma and Vipassana meditation center. In 1989, he founded The Suan Mokkh International Dharma Hermitage for international Vipassana meditation practitioners around the world. There is a 10-day silent meditation retreat that starts on the 1st of each month for the whole year which is free, of no charge for international practitioners who are interested in practicing meditation. He was a central monk in the popularization of the Thai Forest Tradition in the South of Thailand. He was a great Dhamma author who wrote many well-known Dhamma books: Handbook for Mankind, Heart-wood from the Bo Tree, Keys to Natural Truth, Me and Mine, Mindfulness of Breathing and The A, B, Cs of Buddhism etc. On October 20, 2005, The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) announced praise to “Buddhadasa Bhikkhu”, an important person in the world and celebrated the 100th anniversary on May 27, 2006. They held an academic activity to disseminate the Buddhist principles that Ajahn Buddhadasa had taught people around the world. So, he was the practitioner of a great Thai Forest Tradition who practiced well and spread Dhammas for people around the world to realize the core and heart of Buddhism.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ajahn Buddhadasa |publisher=Suan Mokkh |url=https://www.suanmokkh.org/buddhadasa}}</ref>


====Forest monasteries in the West====
{{quote|Buddhist history has shown that wilderness traditions go through a very quick life cycle. As one loses its momentum, another often grows up in its place. But with the wholesale destruction of Thailand's forests in the last few decades, the Kammatthana tradition may be the last great forest tradition that Thailand will produce. Fortunately, we in the West have learned of it in time to gather lessons that will be help in cultivating the customs of the noble ones on Western soil and establishing authentic wilderness traditions of our own.}}
]
{{main|Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah}}


] (1918–1992) was a central person in the popularisation of the Thai Forest Tradition in the west.{{sfn|Zuidema|2015}}{{refn|group=note|Zuidema: "Ajahn Chah (1918–1992) is the most famous Thai Forest teacher. He is acknowledged to have played an instrumental role in spreading the Thai Forest tradition to the west and in making this tradition an international phenomenon in his lifetime."{{sfn|Zuidema|2015}}}} In contrast to most members of the Forest Tradition he was not a Dhammayut monk, but a Mahanikaya monk. He only spent one weekend with Ajahn Mun, but had teachers within the Mahanikaya who had more exposure to Ajahn Mun. His connection to the Forest Tradition was publicly recognized by Ajahn Maha Bua. The community that he founded is formally referred to as ''The Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah''.
==The Tradition in the West==
{{Refimprove section|date=June 2012}}
{{Western Buddhism}}
The Thai Forest Tradition is one of the major monastic orders of Theravada Buddhism in the West.


In 1967, Ajahn Chah founded ]. That same year, an American monk from another monastery, Venerable Sumedho (Robert Karr Jackman, later '']'') came to stay with Ajahn Chah at Wat Pah Pong. He found out about the monastery from one of Ajahn Chah's existing monks who happened to speak "a little bit of English". In 1975, Ajahn Chah and Sumedho founded ], an international forest monastery in Ubon Ratchatani which offers services in English.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}
===United States===
The first monastery catering to Western practitioners was ] (Thai: 'International Forest Monastery'), founded in Thailand for the training of western ]s in 1975.


In the 1980s the Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah expanded to the West with the founding of ] in the UK. Ajahn Chah stated that the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia motivated him to establish the Forest Tradition in the West. The Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah has since expanded to cover Canada, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Brazil, and the United States.{{sfn|Harvey|2013|p=443}}
Another monastery is ], about {{convert|13|mi|km}} north of ], the monastery has its origins in the 1980s when the UK-based ], foremost western disciple of the Thai ] master ], started getting requests to teach in California. Visits by either himself or one of his senior monks or nuns resulted in the ] being set up in 1988. The monastery's first {{convert|120|acre|km2}} were given directly to Ajahn Sumedho by ] Master ], founder of the ] in ], before he died in 1995. Currently, the monastery rests on {{convert|280|acre|km2}} of mountainous forest land.


===Involvement in politics (1994–2011)===
A well-known American monk, ], also known as Ajaan Geoff, (born 1949) is an ] ] ] ] of the ] (Dhammayutika Nikaya), Thai forest ] tradition. He is currently the abbot of Metta Forest Monastery in ]. Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu is a notably skilled and prolific ] of the ].{{sfn|Chah|2010}} He is also the author of many free ] books.{{sfn|Orloff|2004}}


====Royal patronage and instruction to the elite====
===England===
With the passing of Ajahn Thate in 1994, ] was designated the new ''Ajahn Yai''. By this time, the Forest Tradition's authority had been fully routinized, and Ajahn Maha Bua had grown a following of influential conservative-loyalist Bangkok elites.{{sfn|Taylor|2008|pp=118–128}} He was introduced to the Queen and King by Somdet Nyanasamvara Suvaddhano (Charoen Khachawat), instructing them how to meditate.
] was the first English monastery. In 1976, Ajahn Sumedho met George Sharp, Chairman of the English Sangha Trust. The Trust had been established in 1956 for the purpose of establishing a suitable residence for the training of Buddhist monks in England. By the 1970s, the Trust possessed a property in Hampstead that was not yet deemed suitable for what was desired. During a brief stay in London in 1978, Ajahn Sumedho, while undertaking the traditional alms round of Theravada monks (on ]), encountered a lone jogger who was struck by the Bhikkhu's outlandish attire. The jogger had, by chance, just acquired a piece of overgrown woodland in West Sussex. After expressing an interest in Buddhism, the gentleman attended a ten day retreat at the Oaken Holt Buddhist Center near Oxford after which he offered the forest as a gift to the Sangha. In 1979 George Sharp purchased Chithurst House (a property adjacent to the wood) on behalf of The English Sangha Trust. ] gained legal recognition as a monastery in 1981. The monastery was named Cittaviveka, a Pali word meaning "the mind of non-attachment".


====Forest closure====
] was founded in June of the same year. ] (now the main headquarters of the U.K. monasteries) was established in 1984 and formally opened in 1985. A fourth location is ] (Santidhamma & Bhavanadhamma) (founded by ]).
]


In recent times, the Forest Tradition has undergone a crisis surrounding the destruction of forests in Thailand. Since the Forest Tradition had gained significant pull from the royal and elite support in Bangkok, the Thai Forestry Bureau decided to deed large tracts of forested land to Forest Monasteries, knowing that the forest monks would preserve the land as a habitat for Buddhist practice. The land surrounding these monasteries have been described as "forest islands" surrounded by barren clear-cut area.
===Other western countries===

The Thai Forest Tradition also exists in:
====''Save Thai Nation''====
* ],
In the midst of the ] in the late 1990s, Ajahn Maha Bua initiated ''Save Thai Nation''—a campaign which aimed to raise capital to underwrite the Thai currency. By the year 2000, 3.097 tonnes of gold was collected. By the time of Ajahn Maha Bua's death in 2011, an estimated 12 tonnes of gold had been collected, valued at approximated US$500 million. 10.2 million dollars of foreign exchange was also donated to the campaign. All proceeds were handed over to the Thai central bank to back the Thai Baht.{{sfn|Taylor|2008|pp=118–128}}
* ],

* ] (Kloster Dhammapala monastery)
The Thai administration under Prime Minister Chuan Leekpai attempted to thwart the ''Save Thai Nation'' campaign in the late 1990s. This led to Ajahn Maha Bua's striking back with heavy criticism, which is cited as a contributing factor to the ousting of Chuan Leekpai and the election of Thaksin Shinawatra as prime minister in 2001. The Dhammayut hierarchy, teaming-up with the Mahanikaya hierarchy and seeing the political influence that Ajahn Maha Bua could wield, felt threatened and began to take action.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2005}}{{refn|group=note|Thanissaro: "The Mahanikaya hierarchy, which had long been antipathetic to the Forest monks, convinced the Dhammayut hierarchy that their future survival lay in joining forces against the Forest monks, and against Ajaan Mahabua in particular. Thus the last few years have witnessed a series of standoffs between the Bangkok hierarchy and the Forest monks led by Ajaan Mahabua, in which government-run media have personally attacked Ajaan Mahabua. The hierarchy has also proposed a series of laws—a Sangha Administration Act, a land-reform bill, and a “special economy” act—that would have closed many of the Forest monasteries, stripped the remaining Forest monasteries of their wilderness lands, or made it legal for monasteries to sell their lands. These laws would have brought about the effective end of the Forest tradition, at the same time preventing the resurgence of any other forest tradition in the future. So far, none of these proposals have become law, but the issues separating the Forest monks from the hierarchy are far from settled."{{sfn|Thanissaro|2005}}}}
* ] (], Metta Vihara and Anenja Vihara)

* ] (] monastery)
In the late 2000s bankers at the Thai central bank attempted to consolidate the bank's assets and move the proceeds from the ''Save Thai Nation'' campaign into the ordinary accounts which discretionary spending comes out of. The bankers received pressure from Ajahn Maha Bua's supporters which effectively prevented them from doing this. On the subject, Ajahn Maha Bua said that "it is clear that combining the accounts is like tying the necks of all Thais together and throwing them into the sea; the same as turning the land of the nation upside down."{{sfn|Taylor|2008|pp=118–128}}

In addition to Ajahn Maha Bua's activism for Thailand's economy, his monastery is estimated to have donated some 600 million Baht (US$19 million) to charitable causes.{{sfn|Taylor|2008|pp=126–127}}

====Politic interest and death of Ajahn Maha Bua====
Throughout the 2000s, Ajahn Maha Bua was accused of political leanings—first from Chuan Leekpai supporters, and then receiving criticism from the other side after his vehement condemnations of Thaksin Shinawatra.{{refn|group=note|On being accused of aspiring to political ambitions, Ajaan Maha Bua replied: "If someone squanders the nation's treasure what do you think this is? People should fight against this kind of stealing. Don't be afraid of becoming political, because the nation's heart (''hua-jai'') is there (within the treasury). The issue is bigger than politics. This is not to destroy the nation. There are many kinds of enemies. When boxers fight do they think about politics? No. They only think about winning. This is Dhamma straight. Take Dhamma as first principle."{{sfn|Taylor|2008|p=123}}}}

Ajahn Maha Bua was the last of Ajahn Mun's prominent first-generation students. He died in 2011. In his will he requested that all of the donations from his funeral be converted to gold and donated to the Central Bank—an additional 330 million Baht and 78 kilograms of gold.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=9,9910,0,0,1,0#.WXZJvLNXa0q|title = Buddhist Channel &#124; Personality}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/448638-nirvana-funeral-of-revered-thai-monk|title = ASEAN NOW formerly Thai Visa Forum}}</ref>


==Practices== ==Practices==
{{Refimprove section|date=June 2012}}


===Meditation=== ===Meditation practices===


The purpose of practice is to attain the ] (Pali: ''amata-dhamma''), i.e. ]. According to the Thai Forest Tradition's exposition, awareness of the deathless is boundless and unconditioned and cannot be conceptualized, and must be arrived at through mental training which includes states of ] (Pali: '']''). Forest teachers thus directly challenge the notion of "dry insight"{{sfn|Lopez|2016|p=61}} (insight without any development of ]) and teach that ''nibbāna'' must be arrived at through mental training which includes deep states of ] (Pali: '']''), and "exertion and striving" to "cut" or "clear the path" through the "tangle" of defilements, setting awareness free,{{sfn|Robinson|Johnson|Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu|2005|p=167}}{{sfn|Taylor|1993|pp=16–17}} and thus allowing one to ] for what they are, eventually leading one to be released from these defilements.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dhammatalks.org/books/FoodForThought/Section0017.html |title=Stop & Think |last=Ajahn Lee |author-link=Ajahn Lee |date=20 July 1959 |website=dhammatalks.org |access-date=27 June 2020 |quote=Insight isn’t something that can be taught. It’s something you have to give rise to within yourself. It’s not something you simply memorize and talk about. If we were to teach it just so we could memorize it, I can guarantee that it wouldn’t take five hours. But if you wanted to understand one word of it, three years might not even be enough. Memorizing gives rise simply to memories. Acting is what gives rise to the truth. This is why it takes effort and persistence for you to understand and master this skill on your own. <br /> When insight arises, you’ll know what’s what, where it’s come from, and where it’s going—as when we see a lantern burning brightly: We know that, ‘That’s the flame... That’s the smoke… That’s the light.’ We know how these things arise from mixing what with what, and where the flame goes when we put out the lantern. All of this is the skill of insight.<br /> Some people say that tranquility meditation and insight meditation are two separate things—but how can that be true? Tranquility meditation is ‘stopping,’ insight meditation is ‘thinking’ that leads to clear knowledge. When there’s clear knowledge, the mind stops still and stays put. They’re all part of the same thing. <br /> Knowing has to come from stopping. If you don’t stop, how can you know? For instance, if you’re sitting in a car or a boat that is traveling fast and you try to look at the people or things passing by right next to you along the way, you can’t see clearly who’s who or what’s what. But if you stop still in one place, you’ll be able to see things clearly.<br /><br />In the same way, tranquility and insight have to go together. ''You first have to make the mind stop in tranquility and then take a step in your investigation: This is insight meditation. The understanding that arises is discernment. To let go of your attachment to that understanding is release.''}}<br />Italics added.</ref>
Meditation is a central component in the Thai forest tradition. Methods of meditation are numerous and diverse.


==== Kammaṭṭhāna — The Place of Work ====
====Ajahn Sao Kantasilo Mahathera and Ajahn Mun Bhuridatta====
'']'', (Pali: meaning “place of work”) refers to the whole of the practice to ultimately eradicate defilement from the mind.{{refn|group=note|Ajaan Maha Bua: "The word “kammaṭṭhāna” has been well known among Buddhists for a long time and the accepted meaning is: “the place of work (or basis of work).” But the “work” here is a very important work and means the work of demolishing the world of birth (bhava); thus, demolishing (future) births, kilesas, taṇhā, and the removal and destruction of all avijjā from our hearts. All this is in order that we may be free from dukkha. In other words, free from birth, old age, pain and death, for these are the bridges that link us to the round of saṁsāra (vaṭṭa), which is never easy for any beings to go beyond and be free. This is the meaning of “work” in this context rather than any other meaning, such as work as is usually done in the world. The result that comes from putting this work into practice, even before reaching the final goal, is happiness in the present and in future lives. Therefore, those who are interested and who practise these ways of Dhamma are usually known as Dhutanga Kammaṭṭhāna Bhikkhus, a title of respect given with sincerity by fellow Buddhists.{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2010|p=1}}}}
Meditation methods frequently used by Ajahn Sao Kantasilo Mahathera and his student, Ajahn Mun Bhuridatta, are the walking meditation and the sitting meditation. Outside the sitting meditation session, the practitioner must be aware and mindful of his or her body and mind movements in all positions: standing, walking, sitting and lying. During sitting meditation, the mind is calmed with traditional practices such as mindfulness of breathing ('']''). The mental intoning of the mantra "''Buddho''" is used in order to maintain attention on the breath (in-breath is "''Bud''", out-breath is "''dho''") or the contemplation of the 32 body parts. The meditator goes through three levels of samadhi (concentration). In ''khanika-samadhi'' the mind is only calmed for a short time. In ''upacara-samadhi'', approach concentration lasts longer. And in ''appana-samadhi'', ] is attained. When sufficient concentration has been established, the ] (], ], and ]) are contemplated, insight arises and ignorance is extinguished. No distinction is made between samatha meditation and insight ('']'') meditation; the two are used in conjunction.


The practice that monks in the tradition generally begin with are meditations on what Ajahn Mun called the five "root meditation themes": the hair of the head, the hair of the body, the nails, the teeth, and the skin. One of the purposes of meditating on these externally visible aspects of the body is to counter the infatuation with the body and to develop a sense of dispassion. Of the five, the skin is described as being especially significant. Ajahn Mun writes, "When we get infatuated with the human body, the skin is what we are infatuated with. When we conceive of the body as being beautiful and attractive, and develop love, desire, and longing for it, it's because of what we conceive of the skin."{{sfn|Mun Bhuridatta|2016}}
===Vassa (Rains Retreat)===


Advanced meditations include the classical themes of contemplation and mindfulness of breathing:
] (in Thai, phansa), is a period of retreat for monastics during the rainy season (from July to October in Thailand). Many young Thai men traditionally ordain for this period, before disrobing and returning to lay life.
*'']'': a list of ten meditation themes considered especially significant by the Buddha.
*'']'': contemplations of foulness for combating sensual desire.
*'']'': assertions of goodwill for all beings to combat ill will.
*'']'': frames of reference to get the mind into deep concentration


'']'' and '']'' (ānāpānasati) are both part of the ten recollections and the four satipatthana and are commonly given special attention as primary themes for a meditator to focus on.
===Precepts and Ordination===


===Monastic routine===
There are several ] levels: ], ], ] and the ]. The Five Precepts (''Pañcaśīla'' in Sanskrit and ''Pañcasīla'' in Pāli) are practiced by laypeople, either for a given period of time or for a lifetime. The Eight Precepts are a more rigorous practice for laypeople. Ten Precepts are the training-rules for ]s (male) and ]s (female), ] ]s and ]s. The Patimokkha is the basic Theravada code of ] discipline, consisting of 227 rules for monks (]s) and 311 for nuns (]s).


==== Precepts and ordination ====
Temporary or short-term ordination is so common in Thailand that men who have never been ordained are sometimes referred to as "unfinished." Long-term or lifetime ordination is deeply respected. The ] usually begins as an ], in white robes.
{{Main|Pāṭimokkha}}
There are several ] levels: ], ], ], and the ]. The Five Precepts (''Pañcaśīla'' in Sanskrit and ''Pañcasīla'' in Pāli) are practiced by laypeople, either for a given period or for a lifetime. The Eight Precepts are a more rigorous practice for laypeople. Ten Precepts are the training rules for ] and ] (novitiate monks and nuns). The Patimokkha is the basic Theravada code of monastic discipline, consisting of 227 rules for bhikkhus and 311 for nuns ]s (nuns).{{ref|http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html}}


Temporary or short-term ordination is so common in Thailand that men who have never been ordained are sometimes referred to as "unfinished."{{citation needed|date=October 2015}} Long-term or lifetime ordination is deeply respected. The ] usually begins as an ], in white robes.{{ref|http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/ariyesako/layguide.html}}
===Customs===


==== Customs ====
A prominent characteristic of the Forest Tradition is great veneration paid toward Sangha elders. As such, it is vitally important to treat elders with the utmost respect. Care must be taken in addressing all monks, who are never to be referred to solely by the names they received upon ordination. Instead, they are to be addressed with the title "]" before their name, or they may be addressed using just the Thai words for "Venerable," ] or Than (for men). All monks, on the other hand, can be addressed with the general term "Bhante". For monks and nuns who have been ordained 10 years or more, the title ], meaning "teacher", is reserved. For community elders the title ''Luang Por'' is often used, which in Thai can roughly translate into "Venerable Father".
Monks in the tradition are typically addressed as "]", alternatively with the Thai ] or Taan (for men). Any monk may be addressed as "bhante" regardless of seniority.
For Sangha elders who have contributed significantly to their tradition or order, the title ''Luang Por'' (Thai: ''Venerable Father'') may be used.{{ref|http://www.buddhism-guide.com/buddhism/thai_forest_tradition.htm}}


In Thai culture, it is considered impolite to point the feet toward a monk or a statue in the shrine room of a monastery. It is equally considered impolite to address a monk without making the '']'' gesture of respect. When making offerings to the monks, it is considered inappropriate to approach them at a higher level than they are at - for instance, if a monk is sitting it would be inappropriate to approach that monk and stand over them while making an offering. According to ''The Isaan'': "In Thai culture, it is considered impolite to point the feet toward a monk or a statue in the shrine room of a monastery."{{ref|http://the-isaan.blogspot.com/2012/06/kamattan-and-thai-buddhism.html}} In Thailand, monks are usually greeted by lay people with the '']'' gesture, though, according to Thai custom, monks are not supposed to wai laypeople.{{ref|http://www.littlebang.org/addressing-monks/}} When making offerings to the monks, it is best not to stand while offering something to a monk who is sitting down.{{ref|http://www.gotpassport.org/2010/10/05/dos-and-donts-when-visiting-a-buddhist-temple-anywhere-in-the-world/}}


==== Daily routine ====
In practice, the extent to which this cultural code of behavior is enforced will vary greatly, with some communities being more lax about such cultural codes than others. The one element which the forest monastic community are not lax about is the standard Theravada monastic code (vinaya).
] led the monks (in this photo, he was followed by ], later the 20th ]) for morning alms around Ban Taad, Udon Thani, in 1965.]]


All Thai monasteries generally have a morning and evening chant, which usually takes an hour long for each, and each morning and evening chant may be followed by a meditation session, usually around an hour as well.{{ref|http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/buddhistworld/wat_m5.htm}}
Although Forest monasteries exist in extremely rural environments, they are not isolated from society. Monks in such monasteries are expected to be an integral element in the surrounding society in which they find themselves.


At Thai monasteries the monks will go for alms early in the morning, sometimes around 6:00 AM,{{ref|http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/buddhistworld/wat_m5.htm}} although monasteries such as ] and Wat Mettavanaram start around 8:00 AM and 8:30 AM, respectively.{{ref|www.watpahnanachat.org/8-precepts.php}}{{ref|http://www.watmetta.org/dailySchedule.html}} At Dhammayut monasteries (and some Maha Nikaya forest monasteries, including ]),{{ref|www.watpahnanachat.org/8-precepts.php}} monks will eat just one meal per day. For young children it is customary for the parent to help them scoop food into monks bowls.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2003}}{{Incomplete short citation|date=February 2017}}
==Teachers==

{{div col|cols=3}}
At Dhammayut monasteries, ''anumodana'' (Pali, ''rejoicing together'') is a chant performed by the monks after a meal to recognize the morning's offerings, as well as the monks' approval for the lay people's choice of generating ] (Pali: ''puñña'') by their generosity towards the ].{{refn|group=note|Among the thirteen verses to the Anumodana chant, three stanzas are chanted as part of every Anumodana, as follows:
* ]

* ]
{{blockquote|
* ]
1. (LEADER):
* Ajahn Plien Panyapatipo
{{col-begin}}
* Ajahn Lee Dhammadharo
{{col-break|width=50%}}
* ]
:Yathā vārivahā pūrā
* ]
: Paripūrenti sāgaraṃ
* ]
:Evameva ito dinnaṃ
* ]
: Petānaṃ upakappati
* ]
:Icchitaṃ patthitaṃ tumhaṃ
* ]
: Khippameva samijjhatu
* Ajahn Munindo
:Sabbe pūrentu saṃkappā
* Ajahn Thiradhammo
: Cando paṇṇaraso yathā
* Ajahn Anando
:Mani jotiraso yathā.
* Ajahn Sona
{{col-break}}
* Ajahn Ganha
: ''Just as rivers full of water fill the ocean full,''
* ]
: ''Even so does that here given''
* ]
: ''benefit the dead (the hungry shades).''
* ]
: ''May whatever you wish or want quickly come to be,''
* ]
: ''May all your aspirations be fulfilled,''
{{div col end}}
: ''as the moon on the fifteenth (full moon) day,''
: ''or as a radiant, bright gem. ''
{{col-end}}
2. (ALL):
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break|width=50%}}
:Sabbītiyo vivajjantu
: Sabba-rogo vinassatu
:Mā te bhavatvantarāyo
: Sukhī dīghāyuko bhava
:Abhivādana-sīlissa
: Niccaṃ vuḍḍhāpacāyino
:Cattāro dhammā vaḍḍhanti
: Āyu vaṇṇo sukhaṃ balaṃ.
{{col-break}}
: ''May all distresses be averted,''
: ''may every disease be destroyed,''
: ''May there be no dangers for you,''
: ''May you be happy & live long.''
: ''For one of respectful nature who''
: ''constantly honors the worthy,''
: ''Four qualities increase:''
: ''long life, beauty, happiness, strength.''
{{col-end}}
3.
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break|width=50%}}
:Sabba-roga-vinimutto
: Sabba-santāpa-vajjito
:Sabba-vera-matikkanto
: Nibbuto ca tuvaṃ bhava
{{col-break}}
: ''May you be:''
: ''freed from all disease,''
: ''safe from all torment,''
: ''beyond all animosity,''
: ''& unbound.''{{ref|http://www.abuddhistlibrary.com/Buddhism/B%20-%20Theravada/Chanting%20Books/I%20-%20A%20Chanting%20Guide/anumodana.html}}
{{col-end}}
}}}}

====Retreats====
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] -->

] (meaning "austere practice" Thai) is a word generally used in the commentaries to refer to the thirteen ascetic practices. Thai Buddhism has been adapted to refer to extended periods of wandering in the countryside, where monks will take one or more of these ascetic practices.{{ref|https://www.abhayagiri.org/about/thai-forest-tradition}} During these periods, monks will live off of whatever is given to them by laypersons they encounter during the trip and sleep wherever they can. Sometimes monks bring a large umbrella tent with attached mosquito netting known as a ''crot'' (also spelled krot, clot, or klod). The crot usually has a hook on the top so that it may be hung on a line between two trees.{{ref|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjGu9Uj5uCA&index=8&list=PL26D39C0FC5169E26}}

== Teachings ==
=== Original mind ===
{{further|Ajahn Maha Bua#Some basic teachings on the 'Citta'}}
The mind (Pali: '']'', '']'', used interchangeably as "heart" or "mind" '']''), within the context of the Forest Tradition, refers to the most essential aspect of an individual, that carries the responsibility of "taking on" or "knowing" mental preoccupations.{{refn|group=note|This characterization deviates from what is conventionally known in the West as ].}} While the activities associated with thinking are often included when talking about the mind, they are considered mental processes separate from this essential knowing nature, which is sometimes termed the "primal nature of the mind".{{sfn|Lee Dhammadaro|2010|p=19}}{{refn|group=note|The assertion that the mind comes first was explained to Ajaan Mun's pupils in a talk, which was given in a style of wordplay derived from an Isan song-form known as '']'': "The two elements, ''namo'', when mentioned by themselves, aren't adequate or complete. We have to rearrange the vowels and consonants as follows: Take the ''a'' from the ''n'', and give it to the ''m''; take the ''o'' from the ''m'' and give it to the ''n'', and then put the ''ma'' in front of the ''no''. This gives us ''mano'', the heart. Now we have the body together with the heart, and this is enough to be used as the root foundation for the practice. ''Mano'', the heart, is primal, the great foundation. Everything we do or say comes from the heart, as stated in the Buddha's words:<br /><br />''mano-pubbangama dhamma''<br />''mano-settha mano-maya''<br /><br />'All dhammas are preceded by the heart, dominated by the heart, made from the heart.' The Buddha formulated the entire Dhamma and Vinaya from out of this great foundation, the heart. So when his disciples contemplate in accordance with the Dhamma and Vinaya until ''namo'' is perfectly clear, then ''mano'' lies at the end point of formulation. In other words, it lies beyond all formulations.<br /><br />All supposings come from the heart. Each of us has his or her own load, which we carry as supposings and formulations in line with the currents of the flood (''ogha''), to the point where they give rise to unawareness (''avijja''), the factor that creates states of becoming and birth, all from our not being wise to these things, from our deludedly holding them all to be 'me' or 'mine'.{{sfn|Mun Bhuridatta|2016}}}}

{{quote box
|title = '''The Ballad of Liberation from the Khandas (Excerpt)'''
|align = right
|width = 240px
|source = {{small|''by Phra Ajaan Mun Bhuridatta, date unknown''{{sfn|Mun Bhuridatta|2015}}}}
|quote =

"The object of the unmoving heart,
: still & at respite,
: quiet & clear.
No longer intoxicated,<br />
no longer feverish,<br />
its desires all uprooted,<br />
its uncertainties shed,<br />
its entanglement with the khandas<br />
all ended & appeased,<br />
the gears of the three levels of the cos-<br />
mos all broken,<br />
overweening desire thrown away,<br />
its loves brought to an end,<br />
with no more possessiveness,<br />
all troubles cured<br />
as the heart had aspired."
}}

Original Mind is considered to be ] (Pali: "pabhassara").{{sfn|Lee Dhammadaro|2010|p=19}}{{sfn|Lopez|2016|p=147}} Teachers in the forest tradition assert that the mind simply "knows and does not die."{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2010}}{{refn|group=note|Maha Bua: "... the natural power of the mind itself is that it knows and does not die. This deathlessness is something that lies beyond disintegration when the mind is cleansed so that it is fully pure and nothing can become involved with it—that no fear appears in the mind at all. Fear doesn’t appear. Courage doesn’t appear. All that appears is its own nature by itself, just its own timeless nature. That’s all. This is the genuine mind. ‘Genuine mind’ here refers only to the purity or the ‘saupādisesa-nibbāna’ of the arahants. Nothing else can be called the ‘genuine mind’ without reservations or hesitations. "<ref>Venerable Ācariya
Mahā Boowa Ñāṇasampanno, ''Straight from the Heart'', chapter ; translator Thanissaro Bikkhu</ref>}} The mind is also a fixed-phenomenon (Pali: "thiti-dhamma"); the mind itself does not move or follow out after its preoccupations, but rather receives them in place.{{sfn|Lee Dhammadaro|2010|p=19}} Since the mind as a phenomenon often eludes attempts to define it, the mind is often simply described in terms of its activities.{{refn|group=note|Ajahn Chah: "The mind isn’t 'is' anything. What would it 'is'? We’ve come up with the supposition that whatever receives preoccupations—good preoccupations, bad preoccupations, whatever—we call “heart” or 'mind.' Like the owner of a house: Whoever receives the guests is the owner of the house. The guests can’t receive the owner. The owner has to stay put at home. When guests come to see him, he has to receive them. So who receives preoccupations? Who lets go of preoccupations? Who knows anything? That’s what we call 'mind.' But we don’t understand it, so we talk, veering off course this way and that: 'What is the mind? What is the heart?' We get things way too confused. Don’t analyze it so much. What is it that receives preoccupations? Some preoccupations don’t satisfy it, and so it doesn’t like them. Some preoccupations it likes and some it doesn’t. Who is that—who likes and doesn’t like? Is there something there? Yes. What’s it like? We don’t know. Understand? That thing... That thing is what we call the “mind.” Don’t go looking far away."{{sfn|Chah|2013}}}}

The primal or original mind in itself is however not considered to be equivalent to the awakened state but rather as a basis for the emergence of mental formations,<ref>{{cite AV media |last=Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu | author-link=Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu |date=19 September 2015 |title="The Thai Forest Masters (Part 2)" |language=en |url=https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Lectures/IMC/20150919-Thanissaro_Bhikkhu-IMC-the_thai_forest_masters_part_2.mp3 | minutes=46 |quote=''The word ‘mind’ covers three aspects: <br /> (1) The primal nature of the mind. <br /> (2) Mental states. <br /> (3) Mental states in interaction with their objects. <br /> <br /> The primal nature of the mind is a nature that simply knows. The current that thinks and streams out from knowing to various objects is a mental state. When this current connects with its objects and falls for them, it becomes a defilement, darkening the mind: This is a mental state in interaction. Mental states, by themselves and in interaction, whether good or evil, have to arise, have to disband, have to dissolve away by their very nature. The source of both these sorts of mental states is the primal nature of the mind, which neither arises nor disbands. It is a fixed phenomenon (ṭhiti-dhamma), always in place.'' <br /> <br /> The important point here is - as it goes further down - even that "primal nature of the mind", that too as to be let go. The cessation of stress comes at the moment where you are able to let go of all three. So it's not the case that you get to this state of knowing and say 'OK, that's the awakened state', it's something that you have to dig down a little bit deeper to see where your attachement is there as well.}} <br /><br />''Italics'' are excerpt of him quoting his translation of Ajahn Lee's "Frames of references".</ref> it is not to be confused for a metaphysical statement of a true self<ref>{{cite AV media |last=Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu | author-link=Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu |date=19 September 2015 |title="The Thai Forest Masters (Part 1)" |language=en |url=https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Lectures/IMC/20150919-Thanissaro_Bhikkhu-IMC-the_thai_forest_masters_part_1.mp3 | minutes=66 |quote= it's kind of an idea of a sneaking of a self through the back door. Well there's no label of self in that condition or that state of mind.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dhammatalks.org/books/StillFlowingWater/Section0012.html |title=The Knower |last=Ajahn Chah |author-link=Ajahn Chah |website=dhammatalks.org |access-date=28 June 2020}}</ref> and its radiance being an emanation of ] it must eventually be let go of.<ref>{{cite AV media |last=Ajahn Maha Bua | author-link=Ajahn Maha Bua |title="Shedding tears in Amazement with Dhamma" |language=en |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI5TQnYcFn8 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/iI5TQnYcFn8 |archive-date=2021-12-21 |url-status=live|quote=At that time my ] possessed a quality so amazing that it was incredible to behold. I was completely overawed with myself, thinking: “Oh my! Why is it that this citta is so amazingly radiant?” I stood on my meditation track contemplating its brightness, unable to believe how wondrous it appeared. But this very radiance that I thought so amazing was, in fact, the Ultimate Danger. Do you see my point? <br /> We invariably tend to fall for this radiant citta. In truth, I was already stuck on it, already deceived by it. You see, when nothing else remains, one concentrates on this final point of focus – a point which, being the center of the perpetual cycle of birth and death, is actually the fundamental ignorance we call ]. This point of focus is the pinnacle of avijjā, the very pinnacle of the citta in ].<br /> Nothing else remained at that stage, so I simply admired avijjā’s expansive radiance. Still, that radiance did have a focal point. It can be compared to the filament of a pressure lantern.<br /> <br /> ''If there is a point or a center of the knower anywhere, that is the nucleus of existence.'' Just like the bright center of a pressure lantern’s filament. <br /> <br /> There the Ultimate Danger lies – right there. The focal point of the Ultimate Danger is a point of the most amazingly bright radiance which forms the central core of the entire world of conventional reality.<br /> <br /> Except for the central point of the citta’s radiance, the whole universe had been conclusively let go. Do you see what I mean? That’s why this point is the Ultimate danger.}}{{cbignore}}</ref>

Ajahn Mun further argued that there is a unique class of "objectless" or "themeless" consciousness specific to Nirvana, which differs from the consciousness aggregate.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}} Scholars in Bangkok at the time of Ajahn Mun stated that an individual is wholly composed of and defined by the five aggregates,{{refn|group=note|The five '']'' (Pali: ''pañca khandha'') describes how consciousness (''vinnana'') is conditioned by the body and its senses (''rupa'', "form") which perceive (''sanna'') objects and the associated feelings (''vedana'') that arise with sense-contact, and lead to the "fabrications" (''sankhara''), that is, craving, clinging and becoming. }} while the Pali Canon states that the aggregates are completely ended during the experience of Nirvana.

=== Twelve nidanas and rebirth ===
{{See also|Twelve nidanas}}

The twelve nidanas describe how, in a continuous process,{{sfn|Mun Bhuridatta|2016}}{{refn|group=note|Ajaan Mun says: "In other words, these things will have to keep on arising and giving rise to each other continually. They are thus called sustained or sustaining conditions because they support and sustain one another." {{sfn|Mun Bhuridatta|2016}}}} '']'' ("ignorance," "unawareness") leads to the mind's preoccupation with its contents and the associated ] that arise from sense-contact. This absorption darkens the mind and becomes a "defilement" (Pali: '']''),{{sfn|Maha Bua Nyanasampanno|2005}} which lead to ] and ] (Pali: '']''). This in turn leads to ], which conditions ].{{sfn|Thanissaro|2013|p=9}}

While birth is traditionally explained as rebirth in a new life, it is also explained in Thai Buddhism as the birth of self-view, which gives rise to renewed clinging and craving.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Indapanno |first=Buddhadasa |title=Concerning Birth by Buddhadasa Bhikkhu |url=https://www.suanmokkh.org/books/14 |access-date=2022-03-15 |website=Suan Mokkh}}</ref>

== Teachers ==

===Ajahn Mun===
{{Main|Ajahn Mun}}

When Ajahn Mun returned to the Northeast to start teaching, he brought a set of radical ideas, many of which clashed with what scholars in Bangkok were saying at the time:
*Like Mongkut, Ajahn Mun stressed the importance of scrupulous observance of the Buddhist monastic code (Pali: Vinaya). Ajahn Mun went further, and also stressed what are called the protocols: instructions for how a monk should go about daily activities such as keeping his hut, interacting with other people, etc.<br />Ajahn Mun also taught that virtue was a matter of the mind, and that intention forms the essence of virtue. This ran counter to what people in Bangkok said at the time, that virtue was a matter of ritual, and by conducting the proper ritual one gets good results.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
*Ajahn Mun asserted that the practice of jhana was still possible even in modern times, and that meditative concentration was necessary on the Buddhist path. Ajahn Mun stated that one's meditation topic must be keeping in line with one's temperament—everyone is different, so the meditation method used should be different for everybody. Ajahn Mun said the meditation topic one chooses should be congenial and enthralling, but also give one a sense of ] for ordinary living and the sensual pleasures of the world.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
*Ajahn Mun said that not only was the practice of jhana possible, but the experience of Nirvana was too.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}} He stated that Nirvana was characterized by a state of activityless consciousness, distinct from the consciousness aggregate.<br />To Ajahn Mun, reaching this mode of consciousness is the goal of the teaching—yet this consciousness transcends the teachings. Ajahn Mun asserted that the teachings are abandoned at the moment of Awakening, in opposition to the predominant scholarly position that Buddhist teachings are confirmed at the moment of Awakening. Along these lines, Ajahn Mun rejected the ], and argued that all teachings were conventional—no teaching carried a universal truth. Only the experience of Nirvana, as it is directly witnessed by the observer, is absolute.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}

===Ajahn Lee===
{{Main|Ajahn Lee}}

Ajahn Lee emphasized his metaphor of Buddhist practice as a skill, and reintroduced the Buddha's idea of skillfulness—acting in ways that emerge from having trained the mind and heart. Ajahn Lee said that good and evil both exist naturally in the world, and that the skill of the practice is ferreting out good and evil, or skillfulness from unskillfulness. The idea of "skill" refers to a distinction in Asian countries between what is called warrior-knowledge (skills and techniques) and scribe-knowledge (ideas and concepts). Ajahn Lee brought some of his own unique perspectives to Forest Tradition teachings:
* Ajahn Lee reaffirmed that meditative concentration (''samadhi'') was necessary, yet further distinguished between right concentration and various forms of what he called wrong concentration—techniques where the meditator follows awareness out of the body after visions, or forces awareness down to a single point were considered by Ajahn Lee as off-track.{{sfn|Lee Dhammadaro|2012b|p=60}}
* Ajahn Lee stated that discernment (panna) was mostly a matter of trial-and-error. He used the metaphor of basket-weaving to describe this concept: you learn from your teacher, and from books, basically how a basket is supposed to look, and then you use trial-and-error to produce a basket that is in line with what you have been taught about how baskets should be. These teachings from Ajahn Lee correspond to the factors of the first jhana known as directed-thought (Pali: "vitakka"), and evaluation (Pali: "vicara").{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
* Ajahn Lee said that the qualities of virtue that are worked on correspond to the qualities that need to be developed in concentration. Ajahn Lee would say things like "don't ''kill'' off your good mental qualities", or "don't ''steal'' the bad mental qualities of others", relating the qualities of virtue to mental qualities in one's meditation.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}

===Ajahn Maha Bua===
{{Main|Ajahn Maha Bua}}

Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Lee would describe obstacles that commonly occurred in meditation but would not explain how to get through them, forcing students to come up with solutions on their own. Additionally, they were generally very private about their own meditative attainments.

Ajahn Maha Bua, on the other hand, saw what he considered to be a lot of strange ideas being taught about meditation in Bangkok in the later decades of the 20th century. For that reason Ajahn Maha Bua decided to vividly describe how each noble attainment is reached, even though doing so indirectly revealed that he was confident he had attained a noble level. Though the Vinaya prohibits a monk from directly revealing ones own or another's attainments to laypeople while that person is still alive, Ajahn Maha Bua wrote in Ajahn Mun's posthumous biography that he was convinced that Ajahn Mun was an arahant. Thanissaro Bhikkhu remarks that this was a significant change of the teaching etiquette within the Forest Tradition.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
*Ajahn Maha Bua's primary metaphor for Buddhist practice was that it was a battle against the defilements. Just as soldiers might invent ways to win battles that aren't found in military history texts, one might invent ways to subdue defilement. Whatever technique one could come up with—whether it was taught by one's teacher, found in the Buddhist texts, or made up on the spot—if it helped with a victory over the defilements, it counted as a legitimate Buddhist practice. {{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
*Ajahn Maha Bua is widely known for his teachings on dealing with physical pain. For a period, Ajahn Maha Bua had a student who was dying of cancer, and Ajahn Maha Bua gave a series on talks surrounding the perceptions that people have that create mental problems surrounding the pain. Ajahn Maha Bua said that these incorrect perceptions can be changed by posing questions about the pain in the mind. (i.e. "what color is the pain? does the pain have bad intentions to you?" "Is the pain the same thing as the body? What about the mind?"){{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}
*There was a widely publicized incident in Thailand where monks in the North of Thailand were publicly stating that Nirvana is the true self, and scholar monks in Bangkok were stating that Nirvana is not-self. (''see: ]'')<br />At one point, Ajahn Maha Bua was asked whether Nirvana was self or not-self and he replied "Nirvana is Nirvana, it is neither self nor not-self". Ajahn Maha Bua stated that not-self is merely a perception that is used to pry one away from infatuation with the concept of a self, and that once this infatuation is gone the idea of not-self must be dropped as well.{{sfn|Thanissaro|2015|loc=}}

==Related Traditions==
Related Forest Traditions are also found in other predominantly Buddhist Asian countries, including the ] of ], the Taungpulu Forest Tradition of ], and a related Lao Forest Tradition in ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.hermitary.com/articles/thudong.html|title = Thudong: Forest Monks and Hermits of Southeast Asia - Articles - Hermitary}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/Monasteries-Meditation-Sri-Lanka2013.pdf | title=A Guide for Foreign Buddhist Monastics and Lay Practitioners | publisher=Buddhist Forest Monasteries and Meditation Centres in Sri Lanka | date=April 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.nippapanca.org/ |title=Nippapañca Home Page |access-date=2017-02-21 |archive-date=2017-02-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222053022/http://www.nippapanca.org/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>

== See also ==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Notes ==
{{reflist|group=note|35em}}


== References == == References ==
{{reflist|2}} {{Reflist}}


==Sources== == Sources ==

===Printed sources===
{{refbegin}} {{refbegin}}
;Primary sources
* {{Citation | last =Chah | first =Ajahn | year =2010 | title = Not for Sure: Two Dhamma Talks| url =http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/chah/not_for_sure.html | publisher =Abhayagiri Foundation}}, translated from Thai by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.
<!-- A -->
* Chah, Ajahn, (1991), ''A taste of Freedom''. Bung Wai Forest Monastery.
* {{Citation |last=Abhayagiri Foundation |title=Origins of Abhayagiri |url=http://www.abhayagiri.org/about/origins-of-abhayagiri |year=2015 }}
* Kornfield, Jack, (1986), ''A Still Forest Pool''. London, Theosophical Publishing House.
* {{Citation |last=Access to Insight |title=Theravada Buddhism: A Chronology |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/history.html |year=2013 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
* {{Citation | last = Orloff | first = Rich | year = 2004 | title = Being a Monk: A Conversation with Thanissaro Bhikkhu | journal = Oberlin Alumni Magazine | volume = 99 | issue = 4 | url = http://www.oberlin.edu/alummag/spring2004/feat_monk.html}}
<!-- B -->
* Taylor, J.L., (1993), ''Forest Monks and the Nation-State: An Anthropological and Historical Study in Northeastern Thailand''. Singapore: ISEAS, 1993 . ISBN 981-3016-49-3 (original study of forest monks in Thailand)
* {{Citation |last=Bodhisaddha Forest Monastery |title=The Ajahn Chah lineage: spreading Dhamma to the West |url=http://www.bodhisaddha.org/home/about-us/the-ajahn-chah-lineage/ }}
* Tiyavanich, Kamala (1997), ''Forest Recollections: Wandering Monks in 20th Century Thailand''. University of Hawaii Press, 1997. ISBN 0-8248-1781-8.
<!-- C -->
* {{Citation |last=Chah |first=Ajahn |title=Still Flowing Water: Eight Dhamma Talks |url=http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/StillFlowingWater_v130527.pdf |year=2013 |publisher=Abhayagiri Foundation }}, translated from Thai by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.
* {{Citation |last=Chah |first=Ajahn |title=Not for Sure: Two Dhamma Talks |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/chah/not_for_sure.html |year=2010 |publisher=Abhayagiri Foundation }}, translated from Thai by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.
* {{Cite book |last=Ajahn Chah |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z_CyDD3oQ24C |title=A Taste of Freedom: Selected Dhamma Talks |publisher=Buddhist Publication Society |year=2006 |isbn=978-955-24-0033-9 |author-link=Ajahn Chah }}
<!-- K -->
* {{Citation |last=Kornfield |first=Jack |title=The Wise Heart: Buddhist Psychology for the West |year=2008 |publisher=Random House}}
<!-- L -->
*{{Citation |last=Lee Dhammadaro |first=Ajahn |title=Keeping the Breath in Mind and Lessons in Samadhi |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/lee/inmind.html |year=2000 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
*{{Citation |last=Lee Dhammadaro |first=Ajahn |title=Frames of Reference |url=http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/frames_of_reference_v120908.pdf |year=2011 |publisher=Dhammatalks.org |access-date=2017-07-07 |archive-date=2017-07-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170722174830/http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/frames_of_reference_v120908.pdf |url-status=dead }}
*{{Citation |last=Lee Dhammadaro |first=Ajahn |title=The Autobiography of Phra Ajaan Lee |url=http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/a_lee_autobiography_v141212.pdf |year=2012a |publisher=Dhammatalks.org |access-date=2017-07-24 |archive-date=2017-07-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170722175526/http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/a_lee_autobiography_v141212.pdf |url-status=dead }}
*{{Citation |last=Lee Dhammadaro |first=Ajahn |title=Basic Themes |url=http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/BasicThemes(four_treatises)_121021.pdf |year=2012b |publisher=Dhammatalks.org }}
<!-- M -->
* {{Citation |last=Maha Bua Nyanasampanno |first=Ajahn |title=Venerable Ācariya Mun Bhuridatta Thera: A Spiritual Biography |url=https://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/acariya-mun.pdf/ |year=2004 |publisher=Forest Dhamma Books }}
* {{Citation |last=Maha Bua Nyanasampanno |first=Ajahn |title=Arahattamagga, Arahattaphala: the Path to Arahantship – A Compilation of Venerable Acariya Maha Boowa's Dhamma Talks about His Path of Practice |url=http://www.forestdhammabooks.com/book/3/Arahattamagga.pdf |year=2005 |publisher=Forest Dhamma Books |access-date=2017-07-07 |archive-date=2009-03-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327073822/http://www.forestdhammabooks.com/book/3/Arahattamagga.pdf |url-status=dead }}
* {{Citation |last=Maha Bua Nyanasampanno |first=Ajahn |title=Patipada: Venerable Acariya Mun's Path of Practice |url=http://www.amaravati.org/dhamma-books/patipada-venerable-acariya-muns-path-of-practice/ |year=2010 |publisher=Wisdom Library }}
* {{Citation |last=Mun Bhuridatta |first=Ajahn |title=A Heart Released |url=http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/HeartReleased160117.pdf |year=2016 |publisher=Dhammatalks.org }}
<!-- P -->
* {{Citation |last=Phut Thaniyo |first=Ajaan |title=Ajaan Sao's Teaching: A Reminiscence of Phra Ajaan Sao Kantasilo |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/phut/sao.html |year=2013 |publisher=Access to Insight (Legacy Edition) }}
<!-- S -->
* {{Citation |last=Sujato |title=Original Mind Controversy |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPfXiZP9oY |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/9EPfXiZP9oY |archive-date=2021-12-21 |url-status=live|year=2008}}{{cbignore}}
* {{Citation |last=Sumedho |first=Ajahn |title=Thirty years from Hampstead (interview) |url=http://www.fsnewsletter.amaravati.org/html/80/thirty.htm |year=2007 |publisher=The Forest Sangha Newsletter |access-date=2015-10-23 |archive-date=2016-01-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160107020741/http://www.fsnewsletter.amaravati.org/html/80/thirty.htm |url-status=dead }}
<!-- T -->
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=The Customs of the Noble Ones |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/customs.html |year=2010 |publisher=Access To Insight }}
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=The Traditions of the Noble Ones |url=http://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/CrossIndexed/Uncollected/MiscEssays/The%20Traditions%20of%20the%20Noble%20Ones.pdf |year=2006 |publisher=dhammatalks.org }}
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=Legends of Somdet Toh |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/toh.html |year=2006 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=Wings to Awakening |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/wings/part3.html |year=2011 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=With Each and Every Breath |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/wings/part3.html |year=2013 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=Jhana Not by the Numbers |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/thanissaro/jhananumbers.html |year=2005 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
* {{Citation |last=Thanissaro |title=Wilderness Wisdom, The Distinctive Teachings of the Thai Forest Tradition |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1S40nS_0R9Y |year=2015 |publisher=University of the West }}
* {{Citation |last=Thate Desaransi |first=Ajahn |title=Buddho |url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/thai/thate/buddho.html |year=1994 |publisher=Access to Insight }}
<!-- Z -->
* {{Citation |last=Zhi Yun Cai |title=Doctrinal Analysis of the Origin and Evolution of the Thai Kammatthana Tradition with a Special Reference to the Present Kammatthana Ajahns |date=Fall 2014 |publisher=University of the West}}

;Secondary sources
<!-- B -->
* {{Cite journal |last=Bruce |first=Robert |date=1969 |title=King Mongkut of Siam and his Treaty with Britain |journal=Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society |publisher=Royal Asiatic Society Hong Kong Branch |volume=9 |pages=88–100 |jstor=23881479}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Buswell |first1=Robert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-fWKngEACAAJ |title=The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism |last2=Lopez |first2=Donald S. |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-691-15786-3 |author-link=Robert Buswell Jr. |author-link2=Donald S. Lopez, Jr. }}
<!-- G -->
* {{cite web |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/thailand/history-rattanakosin.htm |title=Rattanakosin Period (1782 -present) |publisher=GlobalSecurity.org |access-date=November 1, 2015 }}
* {{Citation |last=Gundzik |first=Jephraim |title=Thaksin's populist economics buoy Thailand |url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/FH03Ae01.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040815070815/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/FH03Ae01.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2004-08-15 |year=2004 |publisher=Asia Times }}
<!-- H -->
* {{Citation |last=Harvey |first=Peter |title=An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u0sg9LV_rEgC&q=thai+forest+tradition+canada+new+zealand&pg=PA443 |year=2013 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=9780521859424 }}
<!-- L -->
*{{Citation |last=Lopez |first=Alan Robert |title=Buddhist Revivalist Movements: Comparing Zen Buddhism and the Thai Forest Movement |url=http://www.palgrave.com/la/book/9781137543493 |year=2016 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan US |doi=10.1057/978-1-137-54086-7 |isbn=978-1-137-54349-3 }}
<!-- M -->
*{{Citation |last=McDaniel |first=Justin Thomas |title=The Lovelorn Ghost and the Magical Monk: Practicing Buddhism in Modern Thailand |year=2011 |publisher=Columbia University Press}}
<!-- O -->
* {{Citation |last=Orloff |first=Rich |title=Being a Monk: A Conversation with Thanissaro Bhikkhu |url=http://www.oberlin.edu/alummag/spring2004/feat_monk.html |work=Oberlin Alumni Magazine |volume=99 |issue=4 |year=2004 }}
<!-- P -->
* {{Citation |last=Pali Text Society |first=The |title=The Pali Text Society's Pali-English Dictionary |url=https://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/pali/ |year=2015 }}
* {{Citation |last=Piker |first=Steven |title=Modernizing Implications of 19th Century Reforms in the Thai Sangha |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_yAVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA8 |work=Contributions to Asian Studies, Volume 8: The Psychological Study of Theravada Societies |year=1975 |publisher=E.J. Brill |isbn=9004043063 }}
<!-- Q -->
* {{Citation |last=Quli |first=Natalie |title=Multiple Buddhist Modernisms: Jhana in Convert Theravada |url=http://www.leighb.com/Jhana_in_Theravada_Quli.pdf |work=Pacific World 10:225–249 |year=2008 }}
<!-- R -->
* {{Cite book |last1=Robinson |first1=Richard H. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-OYQAQAAIAAJ |title=Buddhist Religions: A Historical Introduction |last2=Johnson |first2=Willard L. |last3=Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu |publisher=Wadsworth/Thomson Learning |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-534-55858-1 |author-link3=Thanissaro Bhikkhu }}
<!-- S -->
* {{Cite book |last=Schuler |first=Barbara |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XQuJBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA64 |title=Environmental and Climate Change in South and Southeast Asia: How are Local Cultures Coping? |publisher=Brill |year=2014 |isbn=9789004273221 }}
* {{Citation |last=Scott |first=Jamie |title=The Religions of Canadians |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GbZJ2ZszYw8C |year=2012 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=9781442605169 }}
<!-- T -->
* {{Cite book |last=Tambiah |first=Stanley Jeyaraja |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gsx6QgAACAAJ |title=The Buddhist Saints of the Forest and the Cult of Amulets |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1984 |isbn=978-0-521-27787-7 |author-link=Stanley Jeyaraja Tambiah }}
* {{Cite book |last=Taylor |first=J. L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ReIvQpaqwPUC |title=Forest Monks and the Nation-state: An Anthropological and Historical Study in Northeastern Thailand |publisher=] |year=1993 |isbn=978-981-3016-49-1 |location=Singapore }}
* {{Citation |last=Taylor |first=Jim |title=Buddhism and Postmodern Imaginings in Thailand: The Religiosity of Urban Space |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HiVoq_OHit4C |year=2008 |publisher=Ashgate |isbn=9780754662471 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Tiyavanich |first=Kamala |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YKwwO5oGXwcC&pg=PA245 |title=Forest Recollections: Wandering Monks in Twentieth-Century Thailand |date=January 1997 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-1781-7 }}
<!-- Z -->
* {{Citation |last=Zuidema |first=Jason |title=Understanding the Consecrated Life in Canada: Critical Essays on Contemporary Trends |year=2015 |publisher=Wilfrid Laurier University Press}}
{{refend}} {{refend}}

===Web-sources===
{{reflist|group=web|refs=
<ref name="Sujato_Reform">Sujato's Blog (25 Nov. 2009), </ref>
}}

==Further reading==
;Primary
* {{Citation|ref=none |last=Maha Bua Nyanasampanno |first=Ajahn |title=Venerable Ācariya Mun Bhuridatta Thera: A Spiritual Biography |url=https://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/acariya-mun.pdf/ |year=2004 |publisher=Forest Dhamma Books}}
;Secondary
* {{Cite book|ref=none |last=Taylor |first=J. L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ReIvQpaqwPUC |title=Forest Monks and the Nation-state: An Anthropological and Historical Study in Northeastern Thailand |publisher=] |year=1993 |isbn=978-981-3016-49-1 |location=Singapore }}
* {{Cite book|ref=none |last=Tiyavanich |first=Kamala |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YKwwO5oGXwcC&pg=PA245 |title=Forest Recollections: Wandering Monks in Twentieth-Century Thailand |date=January 1997 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-1781-7 }}
* {{Citation|ref=none |last=Lopez |first=Alan Robert |title=Buddhist Revivalist Movements: Comparing Zen Buddhism and the Thai Forest Movement |year=2016 |publisher=Springer}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{wikiquote|Āraññikattassa}}
*
'''Monasteries'''
*
*
*
'''About the Tradition'''
*
* *
*
*
* (Germany) *
*
* (Germany)
'''Dhamma Resources'''
* (Germany)
* *
* (California, USA) *
*
:*
* (Canada)
* (Thailand)
*
*
* (South Africa)


{{Theravada Buddhist orders}}
{{Buddhism topics}} {{Buddhism topics}}
{{Religion in Thailand}} {{Religion in Thailand}}
{{Navbox Western Buddhism}} {{Buddhism in the West}}


]
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 04:55, 22 December 2024

Lineage of Theravada Buddhist monasticism For the meditation practices called Kammaṭṭhāna ("Place of work"), see Kammaṭṭhāna.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (November 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article may have misleading content. Please help clarify the content. (June 2020)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Thai Forest Tradition
TypeDhamma Lineage
SchoolTheravada Buddhism
Formationc. 1900; Isan, Thailand
Lineage Heads
Founding MaximsThe customs of the noble ones (ariyavamsa)
The Dhamma in accordance with the Dhamma (dhammanudhammapatipatti)
Thai Forest Tradition
Bhikkhus

Dhammayuttika Nikāya

Ajahn Sao Kantasīlo (1861–1941)
Ajahn Mun Bhūridatta (1870–1949)
Ajahn Waen Suciṇṇo (1887–1985)
Ajahn Thate Desaransi (1902–1994)
Ajahn Lee Dhammadharo (1907–1961)
Ajahn Maha Bua (1913–2011)
Ajahn Fuang Jotiko (1915–1986)
Ajahn Suwat Suvaco (1919–2002)
Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu (1949–)

Mahā Nikāya

Ajahn Buddhadasa (1906–1993)
Ajahn Chah (1918–1992)
Ajahn Sumedho (1934–)
Ajahn Khemadhammo (1944–)
Ajahn Viradhammo (1947–)
Ajahn Pasanno (1949–)
Ajahn Sucitto (1949–)
Ajahn Brahm (1951–)
Ajahn Amaro (1956–)
Ajahn Jayasāro (1958–)
Ajahn Sujato (1966–)
Sīladharās
Ajahn Sundara (1946–)
Ajahn Candasiri (1947–)
Complete List
Related Articles
Part of a series on
Theravāda Buddhism
Dharmachakra
Buddhism
History
Key figures
Literature
Orders (Nikāya)
Thailand, Laos, Cambodia
Myanmar
Sri Lanka
Bangladesh
Traditions
Festivals
Higher education

The Kammaṭṭhāna Forest Tradition of Thailand (from Pali: kammaṭṭhāna [kəmːəʈʈʰaːna] meaning "place of work"), commonly known in the West as the Thai Forest Tradition, is a lineage of Theravada Buddhist monasticism.

The Thai Forest Tradition started around 1900 with Ajahn Mun Bhuridatto, who wanted to practice Buddhist monasticism and its meditative practices, according to the normative standards of pre-sectarian Buddhism. After studying with Ajahn Sao Kantasīlo and wandering through the northeast of Thailand, Ajahn Mun reportedly became a non-returner and started to teach in Northeast Thailand. He strove for a revival of the Early Buddhism, insisting on a strict observance of the Buddhist monastic code known as the Vinaya and teaching the practice of jhāna and the realization of nibbāna.

Initially, Ajahn Mun's teachings were met with fierce opposition, but in the 1930s his group was acknowledged as a formal faction of Thai Buddhism, and in the 1950s the relationship with the royal and religious establishment improved. In the 1960s, Western students started to be attracted to the movement, and in the 1970s branch monasteries of the tradition began to be established in the West.

Underlying attitudes of the Thai Forest Tradition include an interest in the empirical effectiveness of practice, the individual's development, and the use of skill in their practice and living.

History

Main article: History of the Thai Forest Tradition

The Dhammayut movement (19th century)

See also: History of Thailand

Before authority was centralized in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the region known today as Thailand was a kingdom of semi-autonomous city-states (Thai: mueang). These kingdoms were all ruled by a hereditary local governor, and while independent, paid tribute to Bangkok, the most powerful central city-state in the region. Each region had its own religious customs according to local tradition, and substantially different forms of Buddhism existed between mueangs. Though all of these local flavors of regional Thai Buddhism evolved their own customary elements relating to local spirit lore, all were shaped by the infusion of Mahayana Buddhism and Indian Tantric traditions, which arrived in the area prior to the fourteenth century. Additionally, many of the monastics in the villages engaged in behavior inconsistent with the Buddhist monastic code (Pali: vinaya), including playing board games, and participating in boat races and water fights.

Vajirañāṇo Bhikkhu, later King Mongkut of the Rattanakosin Kingdom, founder of the Dhammayuttika Nikaya

In the 1820s young Prince Mongkut (1804–1866), the future fourth king of the Rattanakosin Kingdom (Siam), was ordained as a Buddhist monk before rising to the throne later in his life. He traveled around the Siamese region and quickly became dissatisfied with the caliber of Buddhist practice he saw around him. He was also concerned about the authenticity of the ordination lineages, and the capacity of the monastic body to act as an agent that generates positive kamma (Pali: puññakkhettam, meaning "merit-field").

Mongkut started to introduce innovations and reforms to a small number of monks, inspired by his contacts with Western intellectuals. He rejected the local customs and traditions, and instead turned to the Pali Canon, studying the texts and developing his own ideas on them. Doubting the validity of the existing lineages, Mongkut searched for a lineage of monks with an authentic practice, which he found among the Burmese Mon people in the region. He reordained among this group, which formed the basis for the Dhammayut movement. Mongkut then searched for replacements for the classical Buddhist texts lost in the final siege of Ayutthaya. He eventually received copies of the Pali Canon as part of a missive to Sri Lanka. With these, Mongkut began a study group to promote understanding of Classical Buddhist principles.

Mongkut's reforms were radical, imposing a scriptural orthodoxy on the varied forms of Thai Buddhism of the time, "trying to establish a national identity through religious reform." A controversial point was Mongkut's belief that nibbana can't be reached in our degenerated times and that the aim of the Buddhist order is to promote a moral way of life and preserve the Buddhist traditions.

Mongkut's brother Nangklao, King Rama III, the third king of the Rattanakosin Kingdom, considered Mongkut's involvement with the Mons, an ethnic minority, to be improper, and built a monastery on the outskirts of Bangkok. In 1836, Mongkut became the first abbot of Wat Bowonniwet Vihara, which would become the administrative center of the Thammayut order until the present day.

The early participants of the movement continued to devote themselves to a combination of textual study and meditations they had discovered from the texts they had received. However, Thanissaro notes that none of the monks could make any claims of having successfully entered meditative concentration (Pali: samadhi), much less having reached a noble level.

The Dhammayut reform movement maintained a strong footing as Mongkut later rose to the throne. Over the next several decades the Dhammayut monks would continue with their study and practice.

Formative period (around 1900)

The Kammaṭṭhāna Forest Tradition started around 1900 with Ajahn Mun Bhuridatto, who studied with Ajahn Sao Kantasīlo, and wanted to practice Buddhist monasticism, and its meditative practices, according to the normative standards of pre-sectarian Buddhism, which Ajahn Mun termed "the customs of the noble ones".

Wat Liap monastery and Fifth Reign reforms

While ordained in the Dhammayut movement, Ajahn Sao (1861–1941) questioned the impossibility to attain nibbana. He rejected the textual orientation of the Dhammayut movement and set out to bring the dhamma into actual practice. In the late nineteenth century he was posted as abbot of Wat Liap, in Ubon. According to Phra Ajahn Phut Thaniyo, one of Ajahn Sao's students, Ajahn Sao was "not a preacher or a speaker, but a doer," who said very little when teaching his students. He taught his students to "Meditate on the word 'Buddho,'" which would aid in developing concentration and mindfulness of meditation objects.

Ajahn Mun (1870–1949) went to Wat Liap monastery immediately after being ordained in 1893, where he started to practice kasina-meditation, in which awareness is directed away from the body. While it leads to a state of calm-abiding, it also leads to visions and out-of-body experiences. He then turned to his keeping awareness of his body at all times, taking full sweeps of the body through a walking meditation practice, which leads to a more satisfactory state of calm-abiding.

Ajahn Mun Bhuridatto (left) and Ajahn Sao Kantasīlo (right), founders of the Kammatthana Forest lineage.

During this time, Chulalongkorn (1853–1910), the fifth monarch of the Rattanakosin Kingdom, and his brother Prince Wachirayan, initiated a cultural modernization of the entire region. This modernization included an ongoing campaign to homogenize Buddhism among the villages. Chulalongkorn and Wachiraayan were taught by Western tutors and held distaste for the more mystical aspects of Buddhism. They abandoned Mongkut's search for the noble attainments, indirectly stating that the noble attainments were no longer possible. In an introduction to the Buddhist monastic code written by Wachirayan, he stated that the rule forbidding monks to make claims to superior attainments was no longer relevant.

During this time, the Thai government enacted legislation to group these factions into official monastic fraternities. The monks ordained as part of the Dhammayut reform movement were now part of the Dhammayut order, and all remaining regional monks were grouped together as the Mahanikai order.

Wandering non-returner

After his stay at Wat Liap, Ajaan Mun wandered through the Northeast. Ajahn Mun still had visions, when his concentration and mindfulness were lost, but through trial and error he eventually found a method for taming his mind.

As his mind gained more inner stability, he gradually headed towards Bangkok, consulting his childhood friend Chao Khun Upali on practices pertaining to the development of insight (Pali: paññā, also meaning "wisdom" or "discernment"). He then left for an unspecified period, staying in caves in Lopburi, before returning to Bangkok one final time to consult with Chao Khun Upali, again pertaining to the practice of paññā.

Feeling confident in his paññā practice he left for Sarika Cave. During his stay there, Ajahn Mun was critically ill for several days. After medicines failed to remedy his illness, Ajahn Mun ceased to take medication and resolved to rely on the power of his Buddhist practice. Ajahn Mun investigated the nature of the mind and this pain, until his illness disappeared, and successfully coped with visions featuring a club-wielding demon apparition who claimed he was the owner of the cave. According to forest tradition accounts, Ajahn Mun attained the noble level of non-returner (Pali: "anagami") after subduing this apparition and working through subsequent visions he encountered in the cave.

Establishment and resistance (1900s–1930s)

Establishment

Ajahn Mun returned to the Northeast to start teaching, which marked the effective beginning of the Kammatthana tradition. He insisted on a scrupulous observance of the Vinaya, the Buddhist monastic code, and of the protocols, the instructions for the daily activities of the monk. He taught that virtue was a matter of the mind, not of rituals, and that intention forms the essence of virtue, not the proper conduct of rituals. He asserted that meditative concentration was necessary on the Buddhist path and that the practice of jhana and the experience of Nirvana was still possible even in modern times.

Resistance

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2018)

Ajahn Mun's approach met with resistance from the religious establishment. He challenged the text-based approach of the city-monks, opposing their claims about the non-attainability of jhāna and nibbāna with his own experience-based teachings.

His report of having reached a noble attainment was met with mixed reactions among the Thai clergy. The ecclesiastical official Ven. Chao Khun Upali held Ajahn Mun in high esteem, which would be a significant factor in the subsequent leeway that state authorities gave him and his students. Tisso Uan (1867–1956), who later rose to Thailand's highest ecclesiastical rank of somdet, thoroughly rejected the authenticity of Ajahn Mun's attainment.

The tension between the forest tradition and the Thammayut administrative hierarchy escalated in 1926 when Tisso Uan attempted to drive a senior Forest Tradition monk named Ajahn Sing—along with his following of 50 monks and 100 nuns and laypeople—out of Ubon, which was under Tisso Uan's jurisdiction. Ajahn Sing refused, saying he and many of his supporters were born there, and they weren't doing anything to harm anyone. After arguments with district officials, the directive was eventually dropped.

Institutionalisation and growth (1930s–1990s)

Acceptance in Bangkok

In the late 1930s, Tisso Uan formally recognized the Kammaṭṭhāna monks as a faction. However, even after Ajahn Mun died in 1949, Tisso Uan continued to insist that Ajahn Mun had never been qualified to teach because he hadn't graduated from the government's formal Pali studies courses.

With the passing of Ajahn Mun in 1949, Ajahn Thate Desaransi was designated the de facto head of the Forest Tradition until his death in 1994. The relationship between the Thammayut ecclesia and the Kammaṭṭhāna monks changed in the 1950s when Tisso Uan become ill and Ajahn Lee went to teach meditation to him to help cope with his illness.

Ajahn Lee Dhammadaro

Tisso Uan eventually recovered, and a friendship between Tisso Uan and Ajahn Lee began, that would cause Tisso Uan to reverse his opinion of the Kammaṭṭhāna tradition, inviting Ajahn Lee to teach in the city. This event marked a turning point in relations between the Dhammayut administration and the Forest Tradition, and interest continued to grow as a friend of Ajahn Maha Bua's named Nyanasamvara rose to the level of somdet and later the Sangharaja of Thailand. Additionally, the clergy who had been drafted as teachers from the Fifth Reign onwards were now being displaced by civilian teaching staff, which left the Dhammayut monks with a crisis of identity.

Recording of forest doctrine

Main article: Ajahn Lee

In the tradition's beginning the founders famously neglected to record their teachings, instead wandering the Thai countryside offering individual instruction to dedicated pupils. However, detailed meditation manuals and treatises on Buddhist doctrine emerged in the late 20th century from Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Sao's first-generation students as the Forest tradition's teachings began to propagate among the urbanities in Bangkok and subsequently take root in the West.

Ajahn Lee, one of Ajahn Mun's students, was instrumental in disseminating Mun's teachings to a wider Thai lay audience. Ajahn Lee wrote several books which recorded the doctrinal positions of the forest tradition and explained broader Buddhist concepts in the Forest Tradition's terms. Ajahn Lee and his students are considered a distinguishable sub-lineage that is sometimes referred to as the "Chanthaburi Line". An influential Western student in the line of Ajahn Lee is Thanissaro Bhikkhu.

Forest monasteries in the South

Ajahn Buddhadasa Bhikkhu

Ajahn Buddhadasa Bhikkhu (May 27, 1906 - May 25, 1993) became a Buddhist monk at Wat Ubon, Chaiya, Surat Thani in Thailand on July 29, 1926, when he was twenty years old, in part to follow the tradition of the day and to fulfill his mother’s wishes. His preceptor gave him the Buddhist name “Inthapanyo” which means “The wise one”. He was a Mahanikaya monk and graduated at the third level of Dharma studies in his hometown and in Pali language studies at the third level in Bangkok. After he finished learning the Pali language, he realized that living in Bangkok was not suitable for him because monks and people there did not practice to achieve the heart and core of Buddhism. So he decided to go back to Surat Thani and practice rigorously and taught people to practice well according to the core teachings of the Buddha. Then he established Suanmokkhabālārama (The Grove of the Power of Liberation) in 1932 which is the mountain and forest for 118.61 acres at Pum Riang, Chaiya district, Surat Thani Thailand. It is a forest Dhamma and Vipassana meditation center. In 1989, he founded The Suan Mokkh International Dharma Hermitage for international Vipassana meditation practitioners around the world. There is a 10-day silent meditation retreat that starts on the 1st of each month for the whole year which is free, of no charge for international practitioners who are interested in practicing meditation. He was a central monk in the popularization of the Thai Forest Tradition in the South of Thailand. He was a great Dhamma author who wrote many well-known Dhamma books: Handbook for Mankind, Heart-wood from the Bo Tree, Keys to Natural Truth, Me and Mine, Mindfulness of Breathing and The A, B, Cs of Buddhism etc. On October 20, 2005, The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) announced praise to “Buddhadasa Bhikkhu”, an important person in the world and celebrated the 100th anniversary on May 27, 2006. They held an academic activity to disseminate the Buddhist principles that Ajahn Buddhadasa had taught people around the world. So, he was the practitioner of a great Thai Forest Tradition who practiced well and spread Dhammas for people around the world to realize the core and heart of Buddhism.

Forest monasteries in the West

Ajahn Chah
Main article: Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah

Ajahn Chah (1918–1992) was a central person in the popularisation of the Thai Forest Tradition in the west. In contrast to most members of the Forest Tradition he was not a Dhammayut monk, but a Mahanikaya monk. He only spent one weekend with Ajahn Mun, but had teachers within the Mahanikaya who had more exposure to Ajahn Mun. His connection to the Forest Tradition was publicly recognized by Ajahn Maha Bua. The community that he founded is formally referred to as The Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah.

In 1967, Ajahn Chah founded Wat Pah Pong. That same year, an American monk from another monastery, Venerable Sumedho (Robert Karr Jackman, later Ajahn Sumedho) came to stay with Ajahn Chah at Wat Pah Pong. He found out about the monastery from one of Ajahn Chah's existing monks who happened to speak "a little bit of English". In 1975, Ajahn Chah and Sumedho founded Wat Pah Nanachat, an international forest monastery in Ubon Ratchatani which offers services in English.

In the 1980s the Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah expanded to the West with the founding of Amaravati Buddhist Monastery in the UK. Ajahn Chah stated that the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia motivated him to establish the Forest Tradition in the West. The Forest Tradition of Ajahn Chah has since expanded to cover Canada, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Brazil, and the United States.

Involvement in politics (1994–2011)

Royal patronage and instruction to the elite

With the passing of Ajahn Thate in 1994, Ajahn Maha Bua was designated the new Ajahn Yai. By this time, the Forest Tradition's authority had been fully routinized, and Ajahn Maha Bua had grown a following of influential conservative-loyalist Bangkok elites. He was introduced to the Queen and King by Somdet Nyanasamvara Suvaddhano (Charoen Khachawat), instructing them how to meditate.

Forest closure

Satellite photo of Northeast Thailand: The once-lush area of Isan, where the Forest Tradition began, has now been almost entirely deforested.

In recent times, the Forest Tradition has undergone a crisis surrounding the destruction of forests in Thailand. Since the Forest Tradition had gained significant pull from the royal and elite support in Bangkok, the Thai Forestry Bureau decided to deed large tracts of forested land to Forest Monasteries, knowing that the forest monks would preserve the land as a habitat for Buddhist practice. The land surrounding these monasteries have been described as "forest islands" surrounded by barren clear-cut area.

Save Thai Nation

In the midst of the Thai Financial crisis in the late 1990s, Ajahn Maha Bua initiated Save Thai Nation—a campaign which aimed to raise capital to underwrite the Thai currency. By the year 2000, 3.097 tonnes of gold was collected. By the time of Ajahn Maha Bua's death in 2011, an estimated 12 tonnes of gold had been collected, valued at approximated US$500 million. 10.2 million dollars of foreign exchange was also donated to the campaign. All proceeds were handed over to the Thai central bank to back the Thai Baht.

The Thai administration under Prime Minister Chuan Leekpai attempted to thwart the Save Thai Nation campaign in the late 1990s. This led to Ajahn Maha Bua's striking back with heavy criticism, which is cited as a contributing factor to the ousting of Chuan Leekpai and the election of Thaksin Shinawatra as prime minister in 2001. The Dhammayut hierarchy, teaming-up with the Mahanikaya hierarchy and seeing the political influence that Ajahn Maha Bua could wield, felt threatened and began to take action.

In the late 2000s bankers at the Thai central bank attempted to consolidate the bank's assets and move the proceeds from the Save Thai Nation campaign into the ordinary accounts which discretionary spending comes out of. The bankers received pressure from Ajahn Maha Bua's supporters which effectively prevented them from doing this. On the subject, Ajahn Maha Bua said that "it is clear that combining the accounts is like tying the necks of all Thais together and throwing them into the sea; the same as turning the land of the nation upside down."

In addition to Ajahn Maha Bua's activism for Thailand's economy, his monastery is estimated to have donated some 600 million Baht (US$19 million) to charitable causes.

Politic interest and death of Ajahn Maha Bua

Throughout the 2000s, Ajahn Maha Bua was accused of political leanings—first from Chuan Leekpai supporters, and then receiving criticism from the other side after his vehement condemnations of Thaksin Shinawatra.

Ajahn Maha Bua was the last of Ajahn Mun's prominent first-generation students. He died in 2011. In his will he requested that all of the donations from his funeral be converted to gold and donated to the Central Bank—an additional 330 million Baht and 78 kilograms of gold.

Practices

Meditation practices

The purpose of practice is to attain the deathless (Pali: amata-dhamma), i.e. Nibbāna. According to the Thai Forest Tradition's exposition, awareness of the deathless is boundless and unconditioned and cannot be conceptualized, and must be arrived at through mental training which includes states of meditative concentration (Pali: jhana). Forest teachers thus directly challenge the notion of "dry insight" (insight without any development of concentration) and teach that nibbāna must be arrived at through mental training which includes deep states of meditative concentration (Pali: jhāna), and "exertion and striving" to "cut" or "clear the path" through the "tangle" of defilements, setting awareness free, and thus allowing one to see them clearly for what they are, eventually leading one to be released from these defilements.

Kammaṭṭhāna — The Place of Work

Kammaṭṭhāna, (Pali: meaning “place of work”) refers to the whole of the practice to ultimately eradicate defilement from the mind.

The practice that monks in the tradition generally begin with are meditations on what Ajahn Mun called the five "root meditation themes": the hair of the head, the hair of the body, the nails, the teeth, and the skin. One of the purposes of meditating on these externally visible aspects of the body is to counter the infatuation with the body and to develop a sense of dispassion. Of the five, the skin is described as being especially significant. Ajahn Mun writes, "When we get infatuated with the human body, the skin is what we are infatuated with. When we conceive of the body as being beautiful and attractive, and develop love, desire, and longing for it, it's because of what we conceive of the skin."

Advanced meditations include the classical themes of contemplation and mindfulness of breathing:

Mindfulness immersed in the body and mindfulness of in-and-out breathing (ānāpānasati) are both part of the ten recollections and the four satipatthana and are commonly given special attention as primary themes for a meditator to focus on.

Monastic routine

Precepts and ordination

Main article: Pāṭimokkha

There are several precept levels: Five Precepts, Eight Precepts, Ten Precepts, and the patimokkha. The Five Precepts (Pañcaśīla in Sanskrit and Pañcasīla in Pāli) are practiced by laypeople, either for a given period or for a lifetime. The Eight Precepts are a more rigorous practice for laypeople. Ten Precepts are the training rules for sāmaṇeras and sāmaṇerīs (novitiate monks and nuns). The Patimokkha is the basic Theravada code of monastic discipline, consisting of 227 rules for bhikkhus and 311 for nuns bhikkhunis (nuns).

Temporary or short-term ordination is so common in Thailand that men who have never been ordained are sometimes referred to as "unfinished." Long-term or lifetime ordination is deeply respected. The ordination process usually begins as an anagarika, in white robes.

Customs

Monks in the tradition are typically addressed as "Venerable", alternatively with the Thai Ayya or Taan (for men). Any monk may be addressed as "bhante" regardless of seniority. For Sangha elders who have contributed significantly to their tradition or order, the title Luang Por (Thai: Venerable Father) may be used.

According to The Isaan: "In Thai culture, it is considered impolite to point the feet toward a monk or a statue in the shrine room of a monastery." In Thailand, monks are usually greeted by lay people with the wai gesture, though, according to Thai custom, monks are not supposed to wai laypeople. When making offerings to the monks, it is best not to stand while offering something to a monk who is sitting down.

Daily routine

Ajahn Maha Bua led the monks (in this photo, he was followed by Phra Maha Amborn Ambaro, later the 20th Supreme Patriarch of Thailand) for morning alms around Ban Taad, Udon Thani, in 1965.

All Thai monasteries generally have a morning and evening chant, which usually takes an hour long for each, and each morning and evening chant may be followed by a meditation session, usually around an hour as well.

At Thai monasteries the monks will go for alms early in the morning, sometimes around 6:00 AM, although monasteries such as Wat Pah Nanachat and Wat Mettavanaram start around 8:00 AM and 8:30 AM, respectively. At Dhammayut monasteries (and some Maha Nikaya forest monasteries, including Wat Pah Nanachat), monks will eat just one meal per day. For young children it is customary for the parent to help them scoop food into monks bowls.

At Dhammayut monasteries, anumodana (Pali, rejoicing together) is a chant performed by the monks after a meal to recognize the morning's offerings, as well as the monks' approval for the lay people's choice of generating merit (Pali: puñña) by their generosity towards the Sangha.

Retreats

Dhutanga (meaning "austere practice" Thai) is a word generally used in the commentaries to refer to the thirteen ascetic practices. Thai Buddhism has been adapted to refer to extended periods of wandering in the countryside, where monks will take one or more of these ascetic practices. During these periods, monks will live off of whatever is given to them by laypersons they encounter during the trip and sleep wherever they can. Sometimes monks bring a large umbrella tent with attached mosquito netting known as a crot (also spelled krot, clot, or klod). The crot usually has a hook on the top so that it may be hung on a line between two trees.

Teachings

Original mind

Further information: Ajahn Maha Bua § Some basic teachings on the 'Citta'

The mind (Pali: citta, mano, used interchangeably as "heart" or "mind" en masse), within the context of the Forest Tradition, refers to the most essential aspect of an individual, that carries the responsibility of "taking on" or "knowing" mental preoccupations. While the activities associated with thinking are often included when talking about the mind, they are considered mental processes separate from this essential knowing nature, which is sometimes termed the "primal nature of the mind".

The Ballad of Liberation from the Khandas (Excerpt)

"The object of the unmoving heart,

still & at respite,
quiet & clear.

No longer intoxicated,
no longer feverish,
its desires all uprooted,
its uncertainties shed,
its entanglement with the khandas
all ended & appeased,
the gears of the three levels of the cos-
mos all broken,
overweening desire thrown away,
its loves brought to an end,
with no more possessiveness,
all troubles cured
as the heart had aspired."

by Phra Ajaan Mun Bhuridatta, date unknown

Original Mind is considered to be radiant, or luminous (Pali: "pabhassara"). Teachers in the forest tradition assert that the mind simply "knows and does not die." The mind is also a fixed-phenomenon (Pali: "thiti-dhamma"); the mind itself does not move or follow out after its preoccupations, but rather receives them in place. Since the mind as a phenomenon often eludes attempts to define it, the mind is often simply described in terms of its activities.

The primal or original mind in itself is however not considered to be equivalent to the awakened state but rather as a basis for the emergence of mental formations, it is not to be confused for a metaphysical statement of a true self and its radiance being an emanation of avijjā it must eventually be let go of.

Ajahn Mun further argued that there is a unique class of "objectless" or "themeless" consciousness specific to Nirvana, which differs from the consciousness aggregate. Scholars in Bangkok at the time of Ajahn Mun stated that an individual is wholly composed of and defined by the five aggregates, while the Pali Canon states that the aggregates are completely ended during the experience of Nirvana.

Twelve nidanas and rebirth

See also: Twelve nidanas

The twelve nidanas describe how, in a continuous process, avijja ("ignorance," "unawareness") leads to the mind's preoccupation with its contents and the associated feelings that arise from sense-contact. This absorption darkens the mind and becomes a "defilement" (Pali: kilesa), which lead to craving and clinging (Pali: upadana). This in turn leads to becoming, which conditions birth.

While birth is traditionally explained as rebirth in a new life, it is also explained in Thai Buddhism as the birth of self-view, which gives rise to renewed clinging and craving.

Teachers

Ajahn Mun

Main article: Ajahn Mun

When Ajahn Mun returned to the Northeast to start teaching, he brought a set of radical ideas, many of which clashed with what scholars in Bangkok were saying at the time:

  • Like Mongkut, Ajahn Mun stressed the importance of scrupulous observance of the Buddhist monastic code (Pali: Vinaya). Ajahn Mun went further, and also stressed what are called the protocols: instructions for how a monk should go about daily activities such as keeping his hut, interacting with other people, etc.
    Ajahn Mun also taught that virtue was a matter of the mind, and that intention forms the essence of virtue. This ran counter to what people in Bangkok said at the time, that virtue was a matter of ritual, and by conducting the proper ritual one gets good results.
  • Ajahn Mun asserted that the practice of jhana was still possible even in modern times, and that meditative concentration was necessary on the Buddhist path. Ajahn Mun stated that one's meditation topic must be keeping in line with one's temperament—everyone is different, so the meditation method used should be different for everybody. Ajahn Mun said the meditation topic one chooses should be congenial and enthralling, but also give one a sense of unease and dispassion for ordinary living and the sensual pleasures of the world.
  • Ajahn Mun said that not only was the practice of jhana possible, but the experience of Nirvana was too. He stated that Nirvana was characterized by a state of activityless consciousness, distinct from the consciousness aggregate.
    To Ajahn Mun, reaching this mode of consciousness is the goal of the teaching—yet this consciousness transcends the teachings. Ajahn Mun asserted that the teachings are abandoned at the moment of Awakening, in opposition to the predominant scholarly position that Buddhist teachings are confirmed at the moment of Awakening. Along these lines, Ajahn Mun rejected the notion of an ultimate teaching, and argued that all teachings were conventional—no teaching carried a universal truth. Only the experience of Nirvana, as it is directly witnessed by the observer, is absolute.

Ajahn Lee

Main article: Ajahn Lee

Ajahn Lee emphasized his metaphor of Buddhist practice as a skill, and reintroduced the Buddha's idea of skillfulness—acting in ways that emerge from having trained the mind and heart. Ajahn Lee said that good and evil both exist naturally in the world, and that the skill of the practice is ferreting out good and evil, or skillfulness from unskillfulness. The idea of "skill" refers to a distinction in Asian countries between what is called warrior-knowledge (skills and techniques) and scribe-knowledge (ideas and concepts). Ajahn Lee brought some of his own unique perspectives to Forest Tradition teachings:

  • Ajahn Lee reaffirmed that meditative concentration (samadhi) was necessary, yet further distinguished between right concentration and various forms of what he called wrong concentration—techniques where the meditator follows awareness out of the body after visions, or forces awareness down to a single point were considered by Ajahn Lee as off-track.
  • Ajahn Lee stated that discernment (panna) was mostly a matter of trial-and-error. He used the metaphor of basket-weaving to describe this concept: you learn from your teacher, and from books, basically how a basket is supposed to look, and then you use trial-and-error to produce a basket that is in line with what you have been taught about how baskets should be. These teachings from Ajahn Lee correspond to the factors of the first jhana known as directed-thought (Pali: "vitakka"), and evaluation (Pali: "vicara").
  • Ajahn Lee said that the qualities of virtue that are worked on correspond to the qualities that need to be developed in concentration. Ajahn Lee would say things like "don't kill off your good mental qualities", or "don't steal the bad mental qualities of others", relating the qualities of virtue to mental qualities in one's meditation.

Ajahn Maha Bua

Main article: Ajahn Maha Bua

Ajahn Mun and Ajahn Lee would describe obstacles that commonly occurred in meditation but would not explain how to get through them, forcing students to come up with solutions on their own. Additionally, they were generally very private about their own meditative attainments.

Ajahn Maha Bua, on the other hand, saw what he considered to be a lot of strange ideas being taught about meditation in Bangkok in the later decades of the 20th century. For that reason Ajahn Maha Bua decided to vividly describe how each noble attainment is reached, even though doing so indirectly revealed that he was confident he had attained a noble level. Though the Vinaya prohibits a monk from directly revealing ones own or another's attainments to laypeople while that person is still alive, Ajahn Maha Bua wrote in Ajahn Mun's posthumous biography that he was convinced that Ajahn Mun was an arahant. Thanissaro Bhikkhu remarks that this was a significant change of the teaching etiquette within the Forest Tradition.

  • Ajahn Maha Bua's primary metaphor for Buddhist practice was that it was a battle against the defilements. Just as soldiers might invent ways to win battles that aren't found in military history texts, one might invent ways to subdue defilement. Whatever technique one could come up with—whether it was taught by one's teacher, found in the Buddhist texts, or made up on the spot—if it helped with a victory over the defilements, it counted as a legitimate Buddhist practice.
  • Ajahn Maha Bua is widely known for his teachings on dealing with physical pain. For a period, Ajahn Maha Bua had a student who was dying of cancer, and Ajahn Maha Bua gave a series on talks surrounding the perceptions that people have that create mental problems surrounding the pain. Ajahn Maha Bua said that these incorrect perceptions can be changed by posing questions about the pain in the mind. (i.e. "what color is the pain? does the pain have bad intentions to you?" "Is the pain the same thing as the body? What about the mind?")
  • There was a widely publicized incident in Thailand where monks in the North of Thailand were publicly stating that Nirvana is the true self, and scholar monks in Bangkok were stating that Nirvana is not-self. (see: Dhammakaya Movement)
    At one point, Ajahn Maha Bua was asked whether Nirvana was self or not-self and he replied "Nirvana is Nirvana, it is neither self nor not-self". Ajahn Maha Bua stated that not-self is merely a perception that is used to pry one away from infatuation with the concept of a self, and that once this infatuation is gone the idea of not-self must be dropped as well.

Related Traditions

Related Forest Traditions are also found in other predominantly Buddhist Asian countries, including the Sri Lankan Forest Tradition of Sri Lanka, the Taungpulu Forest Tradition of Myanmar, and a related Lao Forest Tradition in Laos.

See also

Notes

  1. Sujato: "Mongkut and those following him have been accused of imposing a scriptural orthodoxy on the diversity of Thai Buddhist forms. There is no doubt some truth to this. It was a form of ‘inner colonialism’, the modern, Westernized culture of Bangkok trying to establish a national identity through religious reform.
  2. Mongkut on nibbana:
    Thanissaro: "Mongkut himself was convinced that the path to nirvana was no longer open, but that a great deal of merit could be made by reviving at least the outward forms of the earliest Buddhist traditions."
    * Sujato: "One area where the modernist thinking of Mongkut has been very controversial has been his belief that in our degenerate age, it is impossible to realize the paths and fruits of Buddhism. Rather than aiming for any transcendental goal, our practice of Buddhadhamma is in order to support mundane virtue and wisdom, to uphold the forms and texts of Buddhism. This belief, while almost unheard of in the West, is very common in modern Theravada. It became so mainstream that at one point any reference to Nibbana was removed from the Thai ordination ceremony.
  3. Phra Ajaan Phut Thaniyo gives an incomplete account of the meditation instructions of Ajaan Sao. According to Thaniyo, concentration on the word 'Buddho' would make the mind "calm and bright" by entering into concentration. He warned his students not to settle for an empty and still mind, but to "focus on the breath as your object and then simply keep track of it, following it inward until the mind becomes even calmer and brighter." This leads to "threshold concentration" (upacara samadhi), and culminates in "fixed penetration" (appana samadhi), an absolute stillness of mind, in which the awareness of the body disappears, leaving the mind to stand on its own. Reaching this point, the practitioner has to notice when the mind starts to become distracted and focus on the movement of distraction. Thaniyo does not further elaborate.
  4. Thanissaro: "Both Rama V and Prince Vajirañana were trained by European tutors, from whom they had absorbed Victorian attitudes toward rationality, the critical study of ancient texts, the perspective of secular history on the nature of religious institutions, and the pursuit of a “useful” past. As Prince Vajirañana stated in his Biography of the Buddha, ancient texts, such as the Pali Canon, are like mangosteens, with a sweet flesh and bitter rind. The duty of critical scholarship was to extract the flesh and discard the rind. Norms of rationality were the guide to this extraction process. Teachings that were reasonable and useful to modern needs were accepted as the flesh. Stories of miracles and psychic powers were dismissed as part of the rind.
  5. Maha Bua: "Sometimes, he felt his body soaring high into the sky where he traveled around for many hours, looking at celestial mansions before coming back down. At other times, he burrowed deep beneath the earth to visit various regions in hell. There he felt profound pity for its unfortunate inhabitants, all experiencing the grievous consequences of their previous actions. Watching these events unfold, he often lost all perspective of the passage of time. In those days, he was still uncertain whether these scenes were real or imaginary. He said that it was only later on, when his spiritual faculties were more mature, that he was able to investigate these matters and understand clearly the definite moral and psychological causes underlying them.
  6. Ajahn Lee: "One day he said, "I never dreamed that sitting in samadhi would be so beneficial, but there's one thing that has me bothered. To make the mind still and bring it down to its basic resting level (bhavanga): Isn't this the essence of becoming and birth?"

    "That's what samadhi is," I told him, "becoming and birth."

    "But the Dhamma we're taught to practice is for the sake of doing away with becoming and birth. So what are we doing giving rise to more becoming and birth?"

    "If you don't make the mind take on becoming, it won't give rise to knowledge, because knowledge has to come from becoming if it's going to do away with becoming. This is becoming on a small scale—uppatika bhava—which lasts for a single mental moment. The same holds true with birth. To make the mind still so that samadhi arises for a long mental moment is birth. Say we sit in concentration for a long time until the mind gives rise to the five factors of jhana: That's birth. If you don't do this with your mind, it won't give rise to any knowledge of its own. And when knowledge can't arise, how will you be able to let go of unawareness ? It'd be very hard.

    "As I see it," I went on, "most students of the Dhamma really misconstrue things. Whatever comes springing up, they try to cut it down and wipe it out. To me, this seems wrong. It's like people who eat eggs. Some people don't know what a chicken is like: This is unawareness. As soon as they get hold of an egg, they crack it open and eat it. But say they know how to incubate eggs. They get ten eggs, eat five of them and incubate the rest. While the eggs are incubating, that's "becoming." When the baby chicks come out of their shells, that's "birth." If all five chicks survive, then as the years pass it seems to me that the person who once had to buy eggs will start benefiting from his chickens. He'll have eggs to eat without having to pay for them, and if he has more than he can eat he can set himself up in business, selling them. In the end, he'll be able to release himself from poverty.

    "So it is with practicing samadhi: If you're going to release yourself from becoming, you first have to go live in becoming. If you're going to release yourself from birth, you'll have to know all about your own birth."
  7. Zuidema: "Ajahn Chah (1918–1992) is the most famous Thai Forest teacher. He is acknowledged to have played an instrumental role in spreading the Thai Forest tradition to the west and in making this tradition an international phenomenon in his lifetime."
  8. Thanissaro: "The Mahanikaya hierarchy, which had long been antipathetic to the Forest monks, convinced the Dhammayut hierarchy that their future survival lay in joining forces against the Forest monks, and against Ajaan Mahabua in particular. Thus the last few years have witnessed a series of standoffs between the Bangkok hierarchy and the Forest monks led by Ajaan Mahabua, in which government-run media have personally attacked Ajaan Mahabua. The hierarchy has also proposed a series of laws—a Sangha Administration Act, a land-reform bill, and a “special economy” act—that would have closed many of the Forest monasteries, stripped the remaining Forest monasteries of their wilderness lands, or made it legal for monasteries to sell their lands. These laws would have brought about the effective end of the Forest tradition, at the same time preventing the resurgence of any other forest tradition in the future. So far, none of these proposals have become law, but the issues separating the Forest monks from the hierarchy are far from settled."
  9. On being accused of aspiring to political ambitions, Ajaan Maha Bua replied: "If someone squanders the nation's treasure what do you think this is? People should fight against this kind of stealing. Don't be afraid of becoming political, because the nation's heart (hua-jai) is there (within the treasury). The issue is bigger than politics. This is not to destroy the nation. There are many kinds of enemies. When boxers fight do they think about politics? No. They only think about winning. This is Dhamma straight. Take Dhamma as first principle."
  10. Ajaan Maha Bua: "The word “kammaṭṭhāna” has been well known among Buddhists for a long time and the accepted meaning is: “the place of work (or basis of work).” But the “work” here is a very important work and means the work of demolishing the world of birth (bhava); thus, demolishing (future) births, kilesas, taṇhā, and the removal and destruction of all avijjā from our hearts. All this is in order that we may be free from dukkha. In other words, free from birth, old age, pain and death, for these are the bridges that link us to the round of saṁsāra (vaṭṭa), which is never easy for any beings to go beyond and be free. This is the meaning of “work” in this context rather than any other meaning, such as work as is usually done in the world. The result that comes from putting this work into practice, even before reaching the final goal, is happiness in the present and in future lives. Therefore, those who are interested and who practise these ways of Dhamma are usually known as Dhutanga Kammaṭṭhāna Bhikkhus, a title of respect given with sincerity by fellow Buddhists.
  11. Among the thirteen verses to the Anumodana chant, three stanzas are chanted as part of every Anumodana, as follows:

    1. (LEADER):

    Yathā vārivahā pūrā
    Paripūrenti sāgaraṃ
    Evameva ito dinnaṃ
    Petānaṃ upakappati
    Icchitaṃ patthitaṃ tumhaṃ
    Khippameva samijjhatu
    Sabbe pūrentu saṃkappā
    Cando paṇṇaraso yathā
    Mani jotiraso yathā.
    Just as rivers full of water fill the ocean full,
    Even so does that here given
    benefit the dead (the hungry shades).
    May whatever you wish or want quickly come to be,
    May all your aspirations be fulfilled,
    as the moon on the fifteenth (full moon) day,
    or as a radiant, bright gem.

    2. (ALL):

    Sabbītiyo vivajjantu
    Sabba-rogo vinassatu
    Mā te bhavatvantarāyo
    Sukhī dīghāyuko bhava
    Abhivādana-sīlissa
    Niccaṃ vuḍḍhāpacāyino
    Cattāro dhammā vaḍḍhanti
    Āyu vaṇṇo sukhaṃ balaṃ.
    May all distresses be averted,
    may every disease be destroyed,
    May there be no dangers for you,
    May you be happy & live long.
    For one of respectful nature who
    constantly honors the worthy,
    Four qualities increase:
    long life, beauty, happiness, strength.

    3.

    Sabba-roga-vinimutto
    Sabba-santāpa-vajjito
    Sabba-vera-matikkanto
    Nibbuto ca tuvaṃ bhava
    May you be:
    freed from all disease,
    safe from all torment,
    beyond all animosity,
    & unbound.

  12. This characterization deviates from what is conventionally known in the West as mind.
  13. The assertion that the mind comes first was explained to Ajaan Mun's pupils in a talk, which was given in a style of wordplay derived from an Isan song-form known as maw lam: "The two elements, namo, when mentioned by themselves, aren't adequate or complete. We have to rearrange the vowels and consonants as follows: Take the a from the n, and give it to the m; take the o from the m and give it to the n, and then put the ma in front of the no. This gives us mano, the heart. Now we have the body together with the heart, and this is enough to be used as the root foundation for the practice. Mano, the heart, is primal, the great foundation. Everything we do or say comes from the heart, as stated in the Buddha's words:

    mano-pubbangama dhamma
    mano-settha mano-maya

    'All dhammas are preceded by the heart, dominated by the heart, made from the heart.' The Buddha formulated the entire Dhamma and Vinaya from out of this great foundation, the heart. So when his disciples contemplate in accordance with the Dhamma and Vinaya until namo is perfectly clear, then mano lies at the end point of formulation. In other words, it lies beyond all formulations.

    All supposings come from the heart. Each of us has his or her own load, which we carry as supposings and formulations in line with the currents of the flood (ogha), to the point where they give rise to unawareness (avijja), the factor that creates states of becoming and birth, all from our not being wise to these things, from our deludedly holding them all to be 'me' or 'mine'.
  14. Maha Bua: "... the natural power of the mind itself is that it knows and does not die. This deathlessness is something that lies beyond disintegration when the mind is cleansed so that it is fully pure and nothing can become involved with it—that no fear appears in the mind at all. Fear doesn’t appear. Courage doesn’t appear. All that appears is its own nature by itself, just its own timeless nature. That’s all. This is the genuine mind. ‘Genuine mind’ here refers only to the purity or the ‘saupādisesa-nibbāna’ of the arahants. Nothing else can be called the ‘genuine mind’ without reservations or hesitations. "
  15. Ajahn Chah: "The mind isn’t 'is' anything. What would it 'is'? We’ve come up with the supposition that whatever receives preoccupations—good preoccupations, bad preoccupations, whatever—we call “heart” or 'mind.' Like the owner of a house: Whoever receives the guests is the owner of the house. The guests can’t receive the owner. The owner has to stay put at home. When guests come to see him, he has to receive them. So who receives preoccupations? Who lets go of preoccupations? Who knows anything? That’s what we call 'mind.' But we don’t understand it, so we talk, veering off course this way and that: 'What is the mind? What is the heart?' We get things way too confused. Don’t analyze it so much. What is it that receives preoccupations? Some preoccupations don’t satisfy it, and so it doesn’t like them. Some preoccupations it likes and some it doesn’t. Who is that—who likes and doesn’t like? Is there something there? Yes. What’s it like? We don’t know. Understand? That thing... That thing is what we call the “mind.” Don’t go looking far away."
  16. The five khandas (Pali: pañca khandha) describes how consciousness (vinnana) is conditioned by the body and its senses (rupa, "form") which perceive (sanna) objects and the associated feelings (vedana) that arise with sense-contact, and lead to the "fabrications" (sankhara), that is, craving, clinging and becoming.
  17. Ajaan Mun says: "In other words, these things will have to keep on arising and giving rise to each other continually. They are thus called sustained or sustaining conditions because they support and sustain one another."

References

  1. ^ Thanissaro 2010.
  2. ^ Thanissaro (1998), The Home Culture of the Dharma. The Story of a Thai Forest Tradition, TriCycle
  3. Buswell & Lopez 2013, p. 696.
  4. Tambiah 1984, p. 156.
  5. ^ Tambiah 1984, p. 84.
  6. ^ Maha Bua Nyanasampanno 2014. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMaha_Bua_Nyanasampanno2014 (help)
  7. Taylor, p. 62. sfn error: no target: CITEREFTaylor (help)
  8. ^ Thanissaro 2005, p. 11.
  9. Taylor, p. 141. sfn error: no target: CITEREFTaylor (help)
  10. ^ Maha Bua Nyanasampanno 2004.
  11. Tambiah 1984, pp. 86–87.
  12. Tambiah 1984, pp. 87–88.
  13. ^ .
  14. ^ .
  15. Taylor 1993, p. 137.
  16. ^ Lee Dhammadaro 2012. sfn error: no target: CITEREFLee_Dhammadaro2012 (help)
  17. ^ Thanissaro 2005.
  18. Taylor, p. 139. sfn error: no target: CITEREFTaylor (help)
  19. "Ajahn Buddhadasa". Suan Mokkh.
  20. ^ Zuidema 2015.
  21. Harvey 2013, p. 443.
  22. ^ Taylor 2008, pp. 118–128.
  23. Taylor 2008, pp. 126–127.
  24. Taylor 2008, p. 123.
  25. "Buddhist Channel | Personality".
  26. "ASEAN NOW formerly Thai Visa Forum".
  27. Lopez 2016, p. 61.
  28. Robinson, Johnson & Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu 2005, p. 167.
  29. Taylor 1993, pp. 16–17.
  30. Ajahn Lee (20 July 1959). "Stop & Think". dhammatalks.org. Retrieved 27 June 2020. Insight isn't something that can be taught. It's something you have to give rise to within yourself. It's not something you simply memorize and talk about. If we were to teach it just so we could memorize it, I can guarantee that it wouldn't take five hours. But if you wanted to understand one word of it, three years might not even be enough. Memorizing gives rise simply to memories. Acting is what gives rise to the truth. This is why it takes effort and persistence for you to understand and master this skill on your own.
    When insight arises, you'll know what's what, where it's come from, and where it's going—as when we see a lantern burning brightly: We know that, 'That's the flame... That's the smoke… That's the light.' We know how these things arise from mixing what with what, and where the flame goes when we put out the lantern. All of this is the skill of insight.
    Some people say that tranquility meditation and insight meditation are two separate things—but how can that be true? Tranquility meditation is 'stopping,' insight meditation is 'thinking' that leads to clear knowledge. When there's clear knowledge, the mind stops still and stays put. They're all part of the same thing.
    Knowing has to come from stopping. If you don't stop, how can you know? For instance, if you're sitting in a car or a boat that is traveling fast and you try to look at the people or things passing by right next to you along the way, you can't see clearly who's who or what's what. But if you stop still in one place, you'll be able to see things clearly.

    In the same way, tranquility and insight have to go together. You first have to make the mind stop in tranquility and then take a step in your investigation: This is insight meditation. The understanding that arises is discernment. To let go of your attachment to that understanding is release.

    Italics added.
  31. Maha Bua Nyanasampanno 2010, p. 1.
  32. ^ Mun Bhuridatta 2016.
  33. Thanissaro 2003. sfn error: no target: CITEREFThanissaro2003 (help)
  34. ^ Lee Dhammadaro 2010, p. 19. sfn error: no target: CITEREFLee_Dhammadaro2010 (help)
  35. Mun Bhuridatta 2015. sfn error: no target: CITEREFMun_Bhuridatta2015 (help)
  36. Lopez 2016, p. 147.
  37. Maha Bua Nyanasampanno 2010.
  38. Venerable Ācariya Mahā Boowa Ñāṇasampanno, Straight from the Heart, chapter The Radiant Mind Is Unawareness; translator Thanissaro Bikkhu
  39. Chah 2013.
  40. Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu (19 September 2015). "The Thai Forest Masters (Part 2)". 46 minutes in. The word 'mind' covers three aspects:
    (1) The primal nature of the mind.
    (2) Mental states.
    (3) Mental states in interaction with their objects.

    The primal nature of the mind is a nature that simply knows. The current that thinks and streams out from knowing to various objects is a mental state. When this current connects with its objects and falls for them, it becomes a defilement, darkening the mind: This is a mental state in interaction. Mental states, by themselves and in interaction, whether good or evil, have to arise, have to disband, have to dissolve away by their very nature. The source of both these sorts of mental states is the primal nature of the mind, which neither arises nor disbands. It is a fixed phenomenon (ṭhiti-dhamma), always in place.


    The important point here is - as it goes further down - even that "primal nature of the mind", that too as to be let go. The cessation of stress comes at the moment where you are able to let go of all three. So it's not the case that you get to this state of knowing and say 'OK, that's the awakened state', it's something that you have to dig down a little bit deeper to see where your attachement is there as well.


    Italics are excerpt of him quoting his translation of Ajahn Lee's "Frames of references".
  41. Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu (19 September 2015). "The Thai Forest Masters (Part 1)". 66 minutes in. it's kind of an idea of a sneaking of a self through the back door. Well there's no label of self in that condition or that state of mind.
  42. Ajahn Chah. "The Knower". dhammatalks.org. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
  43. Ajahn Maha Bua. "Shedding tears in Amazement with Dhamma". Archived from the original on 2021-12-21. At that time my citta possessed a quality so amazing that it was incredible to behold. I was completely overawed with myself, thinking: "Oh my! Why is it that this citta is so amazingly radiant?" I stood on my meditation track contemplating its brightness, unable to believe how wondrous it appeared. But this very radiance that I thought so amazing was, in fact, the Ultimate Danger. Do you see my point?
    We invariably tend to fall for this radiant citta. In truth, I was already stuck on it, already deceived by it. You see, when nothing else remains, one concentrates on this final point of focus – a point which, being the center of the perpetual cycle of birth and death, is actually the fundamental ignorance we call avijjā. This point of focus is the pinnacle of avijjā, the very pinnacle of the citta in samsāra.
    Nothing else remained at that stage, so I simply admired avijjā's expansive radiance. Still, that radiance did have a focal point. It can be compared to the filament of a pressure lantern.

    If there is a point or a center of the knower anywhere, that is the nucleus of existence. Just like the bright center of a pressure lantern's filament.

    There the Ultimate Danger lies – right there. The focal point of the Ultimate Danger is a point of the most amazingly bright radiance which forms the central core of the entire world of conventional reality.

    Except for the central point of the citta's radiance, the whole universe had been conclusively let go. Do you see what I mean? That's why this point is the Ultimate danger.
  44. Maha Bua Nyanasampanno 2005.
  45. Thanissaro 2013, p. 9.
  46. Indapanno, Buddhadasa. "Concerning Birth by Buddhadasa Bhikkhu". Suan Mokkh. Retrieved 2022-03-15.
  47. Lee Dhammadaro 2012b, p. 60.
  48. .
  49. .
  50. .
  51. "Thudong: Forest Monks and Hermits of Southeast Asia - Articles - Hermitary".
  52. "A Guide for Foreign Buddhist Monastics and Lay Practitioners" (PDF). Buddhist Forest Monasteries and Meditation Centres in Sri Lanka. April 2013.
  53. "Nippapañca Home Page". Archived from the original on 2017-02-22. Retrieved 2017-02-21.

Sources

Printed sources

Primary sources
Secondary sources

Web-sources

  1. ^ Sujato's Blog (25 Nov. 2009), Reform
  2. ^ Phra Ajaan Phut Thaniyo, Ajaan Sao's Teaching. A Reminiscence of Phra Ajaan Sao Kantasilo, translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu

Further reading

Primary
Secondary

External links

Monasteries

About the Tradition

Dhamma Resources

Theravada Buddhist orders
Bangladesh
Cambodia
Myanmar (Burma)
Sri Lanka
Thailand
   Topics in Buddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Religion in Thailand
Buddhism
Theravada
Other topics
Other religions
Other topics
Buddhism in the West
Main articles
Theravada
USA Zen
European Zen
Pure Land
Tibetan Buddhism
Exchange
Categories: