Misplaced Pages

User talk:Stemoc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:28, 21 June 2015 editLetcreate123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,166 edits Caution: Harassment of other users on Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:30, 28 September 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots531,529 edits Notification that File:Planet Rugby logo.gif is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 
(275 intermediate revisions by 82 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:Cometstyles/Format-Header2}}
*'''currently''' '''''bored'''''
{{User:One/Title|Comets Lair}}
<br><div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border:; background-color: #ffce7b;">
<div class="center">''' <span class="plainlinks"></span> to leave me a new message, ] to e-mail me '''</div></div><br>
]
{| align="center" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" style="background: none;"
|style="color: white; -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 20px;" width="700px" align="left" bgcolor="lightsteelblue" |'''<span style="font-size: medium;">]</span>'''
|-
|align="left" style="background: #FFFFF3; border:2px solid lightsteelblue; font-size: 90%; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 20px;"|

<div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px brown; background-color: #CCFFFF;"><div class="center">'''.'''</div></div>

<div class="center">]</div>
<div style="float:right; padding-left:5px;"><div style="height: 600px; width: 180px; overflow: auto;">__TOC__</div></div>

Per ] - image was previously showing as dostorted - OK now - I had attempted to fix
] (]) 15:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)pajokie

==Archive== ==Archive==
**]** **]**


== Sky Pacific ==

I don't think the guide you cite applies to red categories. And I don't see what Jesus has got to do with it.] (]) 21:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
:I called you jesus because you are trying to walk on water instead of swimming across like normal people....SKy Pacific isn't the only company they own, they also own ] as well as ]..so a red link is justified and yes, it does apply to categories too..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 22:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions (1 revert per 24 hours) ==

] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 09:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> ] (]) 09:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|TomStar81}} WTF??? do you even follow or understand the lasw set on that certain page Tom? I was not the one violating anything, per rule, Gage Skidmore/Calibrador is NOT allowed to change the image on that page and he did quite cunningly by replacing a different image added by someone not aware with one of his added by another..Tom if you have no idea whats happening, please keep away from the page...READ my last few edits, I was '''ENFORCING''' THE NO IMAGE CHANGE RULE, not BREAKING IT.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 09:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
:::also {{ping|TomStar81}} restoring the image back to the original because as per rule, NO ONE is allowed to change the image is not a violation of 1RR or 3RR, its reverting "vandalism"...read my edit summaries first, It was decided on WP:ANI that the image on that page CANNOT be changed unless it was discussed on the talk page,. It was never discussed but forcefully implemented by 3 users, one of who who reported me who is NOT allowed ot change the image on that page EVER..I reverted them telling why, if thats vandalism then please '''BLOCK ME INDEFINITELY''' cause i'd rather not be part of a site where the "Real" vandals who lie all the time never get blocked.....--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 09:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
:I have moved the file on commons to a more descriptive filename. We typically do NOT want images on highly visible current event articles to change without consensus regardless of any specific policy or rule. --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 09:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
:::Alright, I finished chasing this down and it turns out you are owed an apology. The editnote at the time I leave this message is pretty explicit about enforcing 1RR, however in a moment of wiki-failure it doesn't mention anything about the rfc's for the image to be used in the article. In the absence of that rather important information I presumed that there was a edit war here, so I blocked, which in this case was the incorrect action. Thanks to some help from your fellow editors I have chased ] down and determined that I am in the wrong and you are in the right, so I have unblocked you. Please accept my sincerest apologies, and if you feel the need to report this at ANI I understand. ] (]) 09:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
::::{{ping|TomStar81}} It was decided a while back due to the image getting changed every 2 weeks or so that unless there was "consensus", the image cannot be changed and thus since then we have only had consensus for the current image (august 2015 one) to be used, I tried to change the image back per my first edit cause snake bgd (who was unaware of the rule) the image to something newer, I did not see that edit. Gage Skidmore/Calibrador is prohibited from changing the image on that page so cunningly (without using edit summary), instead of changing it back to the "consenus" image, he changed it to one of and when Wikieditorial it again (i knew via the edit summary), i saw the edit history and knew what happened so i changed it back to the original warning Gage to cause he knows he is not allowed to touch that page per a and when ZiaLater changed the image , I reverted, telling him but Gage Skidmore/Calibrador Zia's addition even though he is not allowed to so i rolled him back with an as a warning and then left a message on the talk page for Gage/Calibrador to and when Wikieditor undid my post, i undid his while telling him then Calibrador warned me on my page and reported me to the 1RR board and he even cited a lie there claiming there was an "attempt to resolve dispute". There wasn't any. What he linked to was me telling him not to change the image on its talk page and quote ...so if anything Tom, its Calibrador you should be blocking who has/refused to learn as he has been reported to not one but 3 WP:Noticeboards and not once but atleast 6 times over the last 12 months for intentionally imposing his images into articles...--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 10:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
:::So it would seem, but I've caused enough trouble for editors here for one day. If it makes you feel better, I added a mention of the image to the current edit notice on the page (]), so ''hopefully'' we can avoid something like this happening again to other editors who are acting in good faith to keep the image there. ] (]) 10:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
::::Indeed, another issue is that people don't understand "consensus", they think one 'other' person supporting the image they added is 'consensus" and thus add/impose that image without proper discussion, maybe a proper consensus closed by an admin would be much better outcome in the future.....--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 10:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
:::::Here's hoping. Also, thanks for the understanding over the confusion. Its unusual that people actually work with me after I make an admin level screw up, so the above lay of the land was a pleasant surprise. On the whole I have to say you handled this well, so I am honored to present you with a your own purple heart. ] (]) 10:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
] (]) 10:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)]]
::::::Nice, Thanks, as you may have noticed, I rarely get "Gifts" on wikipedia lol.. I'll keep it in my private safe :) ..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 10:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

==Admin retention==
Hi Stemoc, I've been wondering how you came to the idea that "evidently, they all disappoint by becoming 'inactive' within 3-6 months". I've been ], and while it's been a while since I looked specifically at retention, we currently have roughly as many active admins as we have had successful RFAs in the last eight years. Can I ask how you calculated that 3-6 month figure? My understanding was that admins usually have quite long wiki careers after successful RFAs. '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 21:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
:What do you take into account when you talk about activity levels? from your graph it seems like you consider atleast 30 edits made in 60 days as "Active" but do you consider how many of these admins are as active as before they became admins?. Obviously an admin can make 5k deletions in a month if they choose to cause there are just so many nonsense out there but how many actually do make say consistently a thousand admin actions a month? I would judge that as being 'active' as an admin rather than 30 warnings in 60 days. If you can collect and compile that information, I'd be intrigued...you can drop it to 500 admin actions a month if necessary..We should not be collecting data on active editors, but on active admins--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 00:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
::I'd agree that the definition of active is unsatisfactory, if it means anything it means active editors who happen to be admins. There have been various proposals to find some alternate way of measuring admins who are active as admins, but they usually founder on such problems as not all admin actions being logged. Our "Active admin" measure does have an advantage of consistency in that it has been measured that way for longer than I've been on the site; So it can show us trends such as us having barely half as many "active admins" as at our peak.
::5,000, 1,000 even 500 logged admin actions is a level of activity, even hyperactivity that I'd say was unhealthy and at the 5,000 level could well lead to a desysop. Some deletions are so clear cut that they generate little subsequent conversation, but anyone doing a high volume of deletions is going to wind up with an awful lot of handholding of people trying to create their first article. If someone did 5,000 in two months I'd worry that they were cutting corners. Aside from the problems of sloppy tagging driving away newbies, we also need to watch out for outright vandals who first turn an article into something deletionworthy and then tag if for deletion. So doing deletion properly is time consuming. But wider than that is the argument that admins should be part of our community, and that should mean doing more non-admin stuff than admin stuff. RFA !voters have long opposed specialists who only want to do admin type things, hence the de facto requirement to have added content. There is also the issue that admins are volunteers, and though we have some retired, semi retired and unemployed editors who are volunteering hours here the equivalent of a full time job, a more normal and sustainable hobby is one that you put an evening or two into in a month, hence the threshold for counting very active editors is >100 mainspace edits a month. A thousand admin actions a month, that is an awful lot for an unpaid hobby, especially as some actions represent quite a bit of time.
::I think it important that we care enough about both the admin and non admin retention to maintain stats. But I'm not keen on doing anything to imply that we only want full time volunteers. '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 16:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

==Happy Holidays==
{| style="background-color: #A3E4D7; border: 1px solid #117A65 ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" |
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
<div class="center">
<big><big><big><big><big>'''The 12 Days of Misplaced Pages'''</big></big></big></big></big><br>
On the 12th day of Christmas Jimbo sent to me <br>
12 ]<br>
11 ]<br>
10 ]<br>
9 Barn Stars<br>
8 ] ]<br>
7 ] Socking<br>
6 Clerks Clerking<br>
5. ] Checking<br>
4 ] Hiding<br>
3 ]<br>
2. ]<br>
and an ] in a pear tree.<br>
<br>
-May your holiday season be filled with joy, laughter and good health. --{{u|Cameron11598}}
</div>
|}

== Thanks ==

I'm about to leave this site, but I wanted to thank you for adding the images of ]. They inspired me to create an article. Took about 10 tiring hours, but I'm happy with the end result. -- ] (]) 06:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|James26}} These things generally work in reverse (article then image) but Good job on creating the article. It looks good, shame you are leaving, i have seen many contributors leave over the last decade..best of luck :)--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 07:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
::Indeed. It usually works in reverse. :) I had noticed for a while that there was no article, and when I searched for images and saw yours, I finally got inspired. Thanks for the compliment, and best of luck to you too. -- ] (]) 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

== AN/I ==

] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> —]<span style="color:#FF9F00;">☆</span>] 10:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

== Regarding your statement at Lourdes' RfA ==

{{u|Stemoc}} Howdy in Fiji! I noticed you wrote on your support: ''Those Opposers; Bad!, Just terrible....''. I was wondering if you would explain to me what that was supposed to mean? DO you disagree with the Oppose's reasons? Or do you think we're hardheaded haters or what? Thanks ] ] 21:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
: Basically yeah, I thought the opposing reasons were quite 'silly' especially those that complain about "experience", i have been here for a decade now and i remember people who were on the wiki for less than 6 months becoming admin, so 14 month is actually pretty good and also, he has a 'CSD background' and if we are going to have admins,its best we have those who know which articles to keep and those to "delete". --<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 22:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
::Ok, Thanks. I saw some people on the RfA were saying things like "94% AfD rate". Do you know of an in-Wiki way to see all the XfD votes a user has made? I know there is a CSD log, but I can't find any automated lists for regular ol' AfD. ] ] 22:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
:yeah, ..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 22:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
::Thanks so much, ] ] 23:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for April 12==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

== WP:ITNC ==

You were right. They posted RD of Leo Baxendale which is not sourced like Vinod Khanna. I have sourced almost everything about Vinod Khanna, even gave them links of international media like TIME, BBC, CNN to make them believe that he was not a ordinary actor. --<strong><span style="font-family: 'Tempus Sans ITC'">] ]</span></strong> 06:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
:I'm aware, they act like that there is no bias but there is, we all know that its quite close to impossible to source for older Indian movies of actors, mainly pre-90s and thus they use that as a reason to not include their deaths, i'm sure only Amitabh, Rajnikanth and the 3 Khans will get an RD (not even a blurb) once they die and no one else...as someone said, they are using RD as a way to impose ] as in, if the article does not qualify for GA, it will never make the RD, That was a big slap on the face of ] and many other Indian actors will follow, RD/Blurb should be based on notability, not how PRETTY their article is , fucking pathetic really...they block or bully off all the people who work on their articles so I don't think anything will change anytime soon--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 06:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for May 9==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

== Jim Hamilton ==

Please can you let me know why you continue to change the creative commons image on Jim Hamilton's Misplaced Pages page, despite having been twice instructed that the image is free to use?

Jim Hamilton owns his own digital media company and, as such, has creative commons portrait images he is free to use. Citing that the image used is "obviously not free" is as unhelpful as it is untrue and comparing Misplaced Pages to a religion is equally unhelpful, unwelcome and needlessly passive aggressive in nature.

No one is interested in engaging in an edit war or prolonging this tiresome exchange. Kindly leave the free to use creative commons image as is and move on.

] (]) 07:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Subclassic

== Rebecca Maders Photo at Golden Globes. ==

Hello, I appreciate you policing the photos. This is my photo I took with my camera. Go ahead and search to see if you find it anywhere else...Rebecca Mader, personally prefers this photo. You can send her a DM on twitter @bexmader and she will confirm. Thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Yes i'm sure you "took" that image........and you didn't it from online ..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 21:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, this is Marc Kayne, Rebecca Mader's husband referred to in the article link you provided. This is a photo that I own, taken with my iPhone. It was first posted by myself on my Twitter account @marcuskayne on January 14, 2016. https://twitter.com/marcuskayne/status/687783087179206659 . Nobody else owns this photo. All other posts of this photo on any social media or any article used my photo. I appreciate you trying to protect the page. If you could kindly leave up the photo that I'm uploading as Rebecca prefers this photo rather than a photo taken by a fan at a comic convention. That would be much appreciated. If you would still like to verify that its actually me, DM or Tweet me on Twitter @marcuskayne. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Sure, you are the "husband" of Mader, Hi, I'm ], ]'s ex husband, nice to meet you..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 00:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey Pal, enough with the smart ass comments. I am her husband. I'm uploading a photo from the same set of pics thats never been posted. Please stop. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

It's him. Also retweeted by Rebecca Mader. —]] 07:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
: see my If you don't know how image rights work, please do not get involved.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 07:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
::Where is the full version for reference? —]] 08:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
:::You can see a (the original crop) next to her, its Kayne and as per policy, unless the person took the image himself/herself, he/she does not own the rights to that image, the right belongs to the photographer who took the image.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 08:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

We took about 20 pics on the red carpet that night. Please Stemco, can you just let it go. These are my photos from my iPhone 6 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

By the way, the picture on the wikipedia page now is not even the same picture as you are providing the link to. This is a picture that I had not posted anywhere until today. Please compare the two photos and you can see they are not the same photo. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Please don't revert ] anymore. 3RR. We'll get the copyright question figured out, but for now it could be considered a content dispute and you risk being blocked. —]] 08:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Stemoc, please let me know what you need to be satisfied on your end? These photos are mine and were taken with my iPhone. The photo you provided a link to was taken by my friend Jerry Mark who was head of security for the Golden Globes event. The other photo that I posted from the same event was taken by me. Please let me know what would satisfy you that these pictures are mine and have free license use. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== ] ==

Hello. You're listed as "Cap" number 61 in this WikiProject (although, confusingly, your name is struck through). It seems that the Project's talk page is sadly neglected these days. I know little about rugby but have seen how important an active WikiProject is to getting quality information on Misplaced Pages by helping each other. If you don't mind the nudge (and you may be very active, I've not checked) please pop by the WikiProject talk page from time to time to reply to comments - or start your own. Cheers. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 00:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Dweller}}, Yeah i no longer associate myself with an archaic project that is going backwards, for a decade now i have tried really hard to get an actual rugby union infobox going, even came up with my own version but the idiots there refuse to use a rugby union infobox and instead forcefully use the pathetic soccer ones (Caps and Goals), I'm not sure why an ENCYCLOPEDIA would use soccer options for rugby union players, i tried many many times and have failed so now i refuse to be part of such a shitty project led by people who have no interest in the project but their on selfish gains..while other similar projects have evolved including the rugby league ones, ours have devolved in the last decade or so..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 00:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
::You could try again? Hardly anyone frequents the project these days. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
NB ] (first one I tried) seems to have ] in it. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 00:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
:::yeah Appearance and points, this ain't soccer where there are only 2 options, rugby has tries, penalties, conversions, drop goals and then points, i made a workable one, used it in a few of the articles i wrote but was forcefully removed because it was on my userspace so that was the last straw for me, i gave this shitty project a decade. I'm done...and in the future if i do manage to create a rugby player article i will forcefully use the rugby league infobox even if the player has no league background, the rugby union infobox is sickening.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 00:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Sounds like your option is far better. Please will you let me know where I can see it? Then I'll leave you alone ;-) --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 08:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
::::I used it for a while until changes made to the "protected" sections of the infobox cause it to become odd (out of place) but it was perfect as a rugby union infobox, easier to update too...when people think Jonah Lomu, they want to know how many caps he had and how many tries he scored, the soccer one totals his tries so people are forced to use their calculator and divide the total by 5 to know the answer which makes the encyclopedia redundant lol, anyways if you want to work on it and make it better, go for it. My interest in this project completely died this year.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 10:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
<small>The RL version looks good: ]. I'm whispering, because I said I'd leave you alone. Really leaving you alone now. --] (]) <small>Become ]</small> 10:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)</small>

== ] ==

Hi ], can you upload an image or two that's free to use of French Montana for ] and ] please? If you can an image for discography should be of him performing, because that's the case on discography articles.--] (]) 06:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

== ] ==

I undid your revision here after spotting it when it tripped a filter - the Daily Mail is discouraged as a source per ]. If you could cite a different one, that would be better. ] (]) 17:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

== Insults not welcome ==

I'd recommend not calling Trump "Dumbo" per ]. From ] it seems that you have been warned numerous times not to insult people. ] (]) 18:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
:yeah But Trump is not "people" so we can insult him.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 21:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Stemoc. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
== Ganges ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
Do you have a citation to support that children and virgins, as opposed to men and the married are sent to the Ganges? If so, post it at the nom and I will change my vote to oppose. Thanks. ] (]) 20:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=813413927 -->


== WP:ANI ==
==Disambiguation link notification for February 21==


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] 11:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


== February 2018 ==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
] Please stop your ]. If you continue to add ] content, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-defamatory3 --> ]] 11:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]


A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals. Please note that ]. Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time.
==Katrina Law date of birth==
Hello Stemoc. I wanted to leave you a message regarding the ] article. There appears to be some contention regarding her date of birth, and unfortunately we cannot accept IMDB, Twitter, or Facebook links as a source for this detail. I have redacted the date of birth for the time being, until we can locate a proper citation as published by a reliable third party. Regards, 19:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Yamaguchi先生}}, Her birth date is correct and is verified by her on twitter herself, the only thing wrong is her birth year, her IMDB is wrong, she is born in 1977, not 1985..I did not add the 1985 birth year, someone else did but her birth month of September 30th is correct...so you actually removed a verified source, please add it back in or trolls will now keep adding the fake birth month and year.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 22:25, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=User%3AStemoc|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-notwebhost-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 13:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
:: Hi Stemoc thank you for following up with me. IMDb, Twitter, and Facebook are not acceptable as sources for ] articles. Is there a ] available which confirms her date of birth? If not, policy dictates that we leave this blank until such a source can be provided. Regards, 22:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


== Note ==
== Possibly unfree File:DanaSnyder.jpg ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> <span style="color:#fff;background:Blue">&nbsp;★&nbsp;</span> ] ] 23:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
== Please don't start an edit war ==


'''Please carefully read this information:'''
See ]


The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].
'''Edits by and on behalf of banned editors'''


Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
"Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule. This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --] <sup>]</sup> 14:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
When reverting edits, care should be taken not to reinstate material that may be in violation of such core policies as neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons. Editors who reinstate edits made by a banned editor take complete responsibility for the content."


== February 2018 ==
Since Russavia is banned, and since he is trolling, you are trolling if you take complete responsibility for his edits.
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;—] <span style="font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 15:41, 25 February 2018 (UTC)</div></div>
<!-- Template:uw-aoablock -->
lol thanks, its obvious sane people are not qualified to contribute to wikipedia..my comment still stands as a fact....--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 22:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
*I've unblocked you based on the conversation with you.—] <span style="font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


== Blocked indefinitely==
He will soon be reported to ] and I assume be blocked.


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing because it appears that you are ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock -->--] (]) 07:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 03:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
:I'm aware of your involvement to get Russavia banned in the first place so pardon me if I ignore your comments, last i checked, Jimbo's talk page was the "UNITED NATIONS" of wikipedia where even banned editors were allowed to speak..who are you to say differently and i was following the rules, I ALLOWED banned editors comments because the comment was only noting his intentions, NOT attacking anyone on the page, so its not I who violated any rules but those who reverted me..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 03:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC) :{{ping|John}}, so you just randomly decided to block me again after the original blocking admin lifted the block citing NO reasoning or anything out of the blue?--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 09:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
::Not random, no. I see evidence and a consensus that right now, with your attitudes, you are not a net positive for the project. In order to be unblocked, you would need to demonstrate what you have learned and what you will change. --] (]) 15:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
:::{{ping|John}}, Ofcourse its not random, you basically blocked me 6 minutes after your friend, TRM posted on the ANI that he was not happy with me being unblocked. You are an "inactive" admin with only 10 admins actions in 2018, so yes, this is not random, just another example of what's wrong with wikipedia today...I won't back down from injustice, never have, never will.--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 22:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
::::I see. Well, if you wish to appeal your block, you know how to do that. 's a link to the current AN/I discussion; your unblock request will have to address that to be successful. --] (]) 22:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
:::::{{u|john}} So - just to ask directly for transparency's sake, were you asked off-wiki to look at this situation or block this editor? ]] 04:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
::::::No. --] (]) 16:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)


Yeah, me and John are and are always doing things together. Not. ] (]) 12:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
== Tracy-Ann Obermann image ==
:Yes, I did wonder at that. If {{u|The Rambling Man}} and I are part of some conspiracy against you, you must admit we've kept it very discreet. --] (]) 19:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
::Well maybe you're just one of my many sockpuppets? ] (]) 19:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
::he meant "off-wiki" but looking at my page history, heh, he doth protest too much..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 06:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


== '''AfroCine:''' Join us for the ''Months of African Cinema'' in October! ==
I'm looking at that "OTRS" image of Tracey on Commons and I'm not sure that it has been through the OTRS queue... ] (]) 22:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
:it was passed by an OTRS agent (MDann52) so i figured it must have..also, that user uploaded atleast 3 copyvios (straight from tracy's website) and claimed to own the rights for them, i got them all deleted so he added another image to his so that he can add the image again to the article..so from copyvios' to flickrwashing to fake OTRS permission and then some OTRS agent who didn't bother to look at the uploader's history allows it...--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 01:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
::If you have an account on Commons, you can chime in on that as background. ] (]) 03:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
==]==
]
This is an automated message from ]. I have performed a web search with the contents of ], and it appears to include material copied directly from http://exnats.webs.com/history.htm.


{{Ivmbox|]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
]
Greetings!


You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not ] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our ] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see ] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> ] (]) 13:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)


This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called ''''']'''''. This new project is dedicated to improving the Misplaced Pages coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the '']''.
== Misplaced Pages and copyright ==
] Hello Stemoc, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your addition to ] has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without ] from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Misplaced Pages, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: ''']'''. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event ]. In preparation for the contest, please do ] that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
*You can only copy/translate a ''small'' amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double ]s (") and a cited source. You can read about this at ] in the sections on "text". See also ], for how to cite sources here.
*Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information ''in your own words and structure'', in proper ]. Following the source's words too closely can create ], so it is not permitted here; see ]. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, .) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to ] information and to demonstrate that the content is not ].
*Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is ]. You may also want to review ].
*If ''you'' own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you ''may'' be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See ].
*In ''very rare cases'' (that is, for sources that are ] or ]), it ''may'' be possible to include greater portions of a source text. ''However'', please seek help at the ] before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources ''may not'' be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you ''do'' confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see ] for the steps you need to follow.
*Also note that Misplaced Pages articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Misplaced Pages project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in ].


It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be ] from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!--Template:uw-copyright-new--> ] (]) 13:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC) If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--] (]) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=18356992 -->


== Welcome to the Months of African Cinema! ==
:technically, this is FIJI, its impossible to find info online (internet only existed here after 2005) and you have to go with what you have..since you pretty much "culled" the article to a crappy 5 line stub, its not worth keeping...if i had to make this article with practically nothing in it, i would have created this along time ago...--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 13:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|]
==Disambiguation link notification for April 30==
]


Greetings!
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>


] welcomes you to October, the ] that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Misplaced Pages, including the English Misplaced Pages! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to ], if you haven't done so already.
==Gage Skidmore edits==


On English Misplaced Pages, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
What exactly are you up to here? {{diff|Hannah Ware|660692251}}{{diff|Emily Kinney|660692089}}{{diff|Lauren Cohan|660692018}}{{diff|Michael Cudlitz|660691915}}{{diff|Michael Keaton|660692686}} Looks suspiciously like ]. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 02:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
:He is violating our policy by replacing the image with his crop so he is doing a ], its not HOUNDING, image name should be descriptive of the location or the people in it, he is intentionally uploading images just because he was to self promote himself, we do not allow this ..he has been doing this for a while, even tried to get images on commons renamed to his name in the image title..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 02:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
::If you have a complaint against the editor, bring it up at ]. Do not follow them around and persistently revert all of their edits. The edits you reverted are not vandalism, and even if you think they violate a policy, you will need to achieve some consensus on this question before you start reverting the user's edits on sight. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 02:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
::See the last image he changed on Neil Druckmann's article, this is the ] image, this is ], this IMO is vandalism to "self promote" himself as a photographer, I won't go to AN/I, this should be solved by admins by blocking him..I'll revert any other he has changed..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 02:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
:::Please produce a link to a Misplaced Pages policy that says the contributor of a photograph that is their own work cannot use a file name for that photograph that includes the photographer's name. Unless you can do so, stop interfering with the photographer's edits immediately. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 02:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
:::In addition, I see no effort on your part to communicate with the editor you are persistently reverting on their Talk page, nor with any admin about blocking them because of your belief that they are violating a policy. So, since no communication is taking place, I can only assume what you are really attempting to do is provoke them into edit warring with you, and provocation is not an appropriate strategy if you are trying to improve the project. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 02:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
::::He already gets an attribution in the image itself and well as having his own ], but to try to change the image title is not allowed, this policy is on commons, not wikipedia as images are stored there , the policy in question is ] and quote, ''"Names should be descriptive, chosen according to what the image displays or contents portray"'', not the NAME of the author, we do not allow that unless the author is a known professional photographer, not a flickr-hack .. and even then for limited images ..I'm not provoking the editor, he is intentionally 'vandalizing' via POV pushing, he has been doing this for years and has been ignored for reasons unknown, Honestly the only option would be to get his flickr feed blacklisted on commons and request a ban there..cause enwiki rarely does anything to people like him..Abusing wikipedia to push your own agenda is one of the biggest violations IMO..I urge you to restore my reversion or i will revert them again, you refuse to see it as a violation, but it is a violation via commons wikimedia--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 02:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
:::::The file names continue to be descriptive of their subjects even with the photographer's name appended. I see no policy at the link you provided which the photographer has clearly violated. There is nothing written at that link that prohibits or even discourages the inclusion of the photographer's name, contrary to your assertion above. If you think some action needs to be taken, you need to bring it up at ] or seek dispute resolution, but you do '''not''' need to follow the user around and revert all their edits because '''you''' do not like what they are doing. If you continue, I will bring your actions up at ]. Understood? <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 02:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
::::::Descriptive how?, all it tells us who the person is and whose pic it is..not the location where the image was taken, and its NOT descriptive the image name has to be DESCRIPTIVE, not the name of the photographer, when you intentionally removed other better cropped images and try to replace them with your own "poor" version of them, its vandalism, the user has a COI, he is pushing his own name and we DO NOT allow that on any Wikimedia sites, even enwiki, he may very well be a paid editor if you see his flickr stream working for the republican party and using wikipedia, sorry abusing Misplaced Pages to promote oneself is a violation. A commons admin did ask him this in , he never replied cause he never does reply..so talking to him is futile....take it to AN/I, afterall thats where everything that can't be solved an will never be solved ends up..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 03:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
:::::::Once again, if you think that a policy is being violated, you should be actively seeking consensus, administrator action or both. If you fail to do either one, and simply revert the editor's contributions on sight without any effort to communicate with them or to correct their behavior, you are engaging in ] and are likely to eventually find yourself the subject of administrative action. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 03:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
::::::::If you haven't noticed, i no longer involve myself with the wikipolitics of this site, I'm not going to keep running to mommy (AN/I) like some two year old, anyone with half a brain can see that the user is violating atleast one of our policies and is getting away with it...I have a long history with wikipedia and cross-wiki vandalism and spamming and even i know this is a combination of both ..as i said, per our policies (commons), he has been given attribution which is the requirement of his "cc-by-sa" licence, there is no requirement for the user to push his own agenda to fuel his personal interests cause that would be violation of wikipedia's highest rule, the ] in relation to this ...still don't see it as a violation?--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 03:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


*'''''Overall winner''''' (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
==Disambiguation link notification for May 7==
*'''''Country Winners'''''
*'''''Diversity winner'''''
*'''''High quality contributors'''''
*'''''Gender-gap fillers'''''
*'''''Page improvers'''''
*'''''Wikidata Translators'''''


For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page ]. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--] (]) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)}}
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ], ] and ] (&nbsp;|&nbsp;). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=18442801 -->


== Digicel Play ==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


== ] of ] ==
== Jamie Dornan ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
Perhaps you consider a distorted frowning face to be a good representation of a person, others don't. If you wish to revert, do give a better reason than "get glasses please".
<blockquote>Digicel Play has been rebranded as Digicel Home and has been merged with the parent company. The information from this article has been moved to the original Digicel article.</blockquote>
Also note that condescension is consider an act of incivility per ]. ] (]) 13:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
:frowning?, i have the same number of lines on my forehead when i smile..yes, get glasses because you honestly don't know the difference between a good image and a poor one...the one you chose is a VERY POOR IMAGE..get consensus next time you change the image or else it will be reverted just as fast...--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 13:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
:: My reason has been given per Misplaced Pages guideline, I would suggest trying to insult my visual judgement is not productive. ] (]) 14:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
:::I would suggest not insulting mine and quote "(no point using an image that doesn't look like him)" when the image clearly looks like him..and also, your answer is not really a good one cause anyone can SEE that that image is the '''BEST''' representation of the actor available..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 14:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
:::: My reason is in accordance with Misplaced Pages guidelines, so far yours apparently not. If you want to set yourself up as "anyone", it's up to you, I have no interest in that. You can easily Google images of Jamie Dornan, and the Misplaced Pages one is the oddest, and least like him. ] (]) 14:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
:::::Well by that reasoning, the one you chose will be the ODDEST of them all..I know the guidelines, its apparently you who does NOT know the meaning of "natural and appropriate visual representation", please, I urge you to learn about it because its quite silly for me to discuss an image related issue with someone who isn't capable of understanding "visual representation" , we are WIKIPEDIA, not GETTY or WIREIMAGE....as you can see above, I go through this type of situations a LOT more than you ever will...this is Dornan on , this is ] and this is ], now tell me, which one looks the "LEAST" like Dornan?..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 14:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
:::::: Yours. (See how easy it is to make an assertion? It is not a productive discussion if all you can do is to assert the superiority of your judgement. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that your judgement is wrong.) ] (]) 15:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Digicel play.png==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Please note that you have violated the ] rule. Any further attempt to revert may result in a block. ] (]) 17:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC) Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
::reverting VANDALISM is not a 3RR violation, and please stop talking on my page, take it to the other talk page..i don't like unnecessary talk here.. ..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 17:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
::: I don't think you understand what constitute vandalism per ]. ] (]) 17:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


== AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October! ==
I will try it one more time - the discussion is open, please try to discuss it first before replacing a good image with an inferior one. I have already explained why it is a better imageb (it is full face, no distortion), you have not, and you are the one who replaced that initial good image you are now reverting, and without justification. There is a vote open in the ] so we can have a consensus. ] (]) 10:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
::No you '''LISTEN''', you are the '''ONLY PERSON''' in the WHOLE of WIKIPEDIA that has a problem with the '''GOOD IMAGE''' being used. I tried solving it amicably but you decide to change the '''IMAGE''' again for the '''UMPTEENTH TIME''', you '''REFUSE''' to a have '''ANY DISCUSSION''' but continuously '''KEEP''' changing the image, the post to have a discussion BARELY lasted '''48 hours''' BEFORE you changed the IMAGE yet AGAIN... You are a '''VANDAL''' and I will '''NOW REPORT''' you....I wrote those in '''CAPS LOCK''' cause you seem to be blind or something ...--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 12:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|]
::: The discussion has been up for almost two weeks, but you have consistently refused to give an explanation why you replaced a good image with an inferior one (one with distorted facial expression), or why you think the image you replaced is an inferior one (and it has been there for a long time before you replaced it). I am merely reverting to its original state before you changed it without proper justification. I have no problem if you want to take this up with the administrators, even if the discussion is ongoing. ] (]) 12:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
::::2 weeks? wow you are a bad liar too, the discussion on the talk page was started on May 15th and you changed it back to the 2011 image on ...if my Maths is correct, that is '''NOT''' 2 weeks so please leave the discussion cause you aim is to push your AGENDA. Go do a Google search on the recent image, its been used by multiple sites and no one is complaining about it '''NOT''' representing Dornan.. the previous image was NOT only outdated but POOR as i have said many times (bad lighting/bad cropping) and as per your comments, is not a representation of what Dornan looks like ..and '''FOR THE LAST TIME''' LEARN TO make a STATEMENT in '''ONE POST''' and STOP '''EDIT CONFLICTING'''..Its '''RUDE''' and '''IRRITATING'''...I will revert you the next time you do that.....--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 12:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


Greetings!
::::: Yes, almost two weeks since the discussion was first opened, I then discovered that you are the one who actually replaced a good image according to the criteria of ] ("natural") with one that is distorted (therefore an inferior one). So I restored the original on May 15 . So yes, that's almost 2 weeks, and all attempts to get you to explain your action has so far failed in almost two weeks. ] (]) 12:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
::::::and again you use the word "distorted", there is NOTHING distorted about the NEW IMAGE, its '''ONLY YOU''' who has a problem with the image, '''JUST YOU''' I already reported you to AIV but ] decided to make his own point and got the report removed without providing ANY input to the current discussion....The original as you say was changed by me in february and between february-May, NO ONE had a problem with the image..Only you and you actually replaced with with a very pathetic images as well from the Berlin film festival and when you did not get your way, you reverted it back to the 2011 one..again, I urge you to NOT touch the image or replace it cause next time i'm reporting you directly to an admin..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 13:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


After a successful ], we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Misplaced Pages articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
:::::::DWPaul did not "get" the report at ] removed. DWPaul does not have that kind of influence around here. DWPaul made in order to ensure that an uninvolved admin would not reflexively act on your report without due investigation. The admin apparently concurred with my assessment, since they removed the report without action. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 13:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


] welcomes you to October, the ] that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to ].
::::::: I would draw your attention to this edit on April 1 . Again, I would repeat that I have no problem with you reporting to an admin. There is currently a vote on the Jamie Dornan page, please give your vote. ] (]) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


On English Misplaced Pages, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
==Donnie Yen==
Hi there,


*'''''Overall winner''''' (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
I understand you have reverted the ] page to one that is actually quite outdated. I understand your reason is the non-free images. While the non-free images issue are still being disputed, I think they should still remain in the page.
*'''''Diversity winner'''''
*'''''Gender-gap fillers'''''


For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page ]. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--] (]) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)}}
Even if they were to remove, the relevant subsections should be not implicated. You revert removes much more than just non-free images, please do take a look.
<!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=19422985 -->
== "A Famiy Man" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]'']'' 07:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
== ""Chris Browning"" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 02:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
|}


== ] of ] ==
Thank you.
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
] (]) 13:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''Lacking in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources to meet ].'''</blockquote>
:NO, the bots '''ONLY REMOVE''' the non-free images, they '''DO NOT''' replace the old images back so when your images are removed (and they will be), some poor guy would have to individually finds the old images and captions and add them back...we get MANY MANY cases of people adding copyvio images only for them to be deleted and remvoed by the bot leaving the page without any images, sometimes for longer than 18 months ..Please restore the section your wrote if you want but DO NOT remove the free images and replace them with your non-free ones.... just because a company closed down DOES NOT mean its images are now FREE..--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 13:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
Thank you for your reply, but relax. We can have an adult conversation without the bold and the Caps. =)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
I have removed the disputed images, "non-free" images for now. As for the relevant subsections, I have restored them.


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
] (]) 13:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
<div class="afd-notice">
:Sorry for that, as you can see, its quite common for me to talk to people who are probably too immature to be online and thus i have to use BOLDED words to make a point, and thanks for reverting to the free version, btw, one rule for images is when there is a free image available, non-free images are not allowed to be used for BLP's....--<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;font-size:medium;font-family: Monotype Corsiva;">]]</span> 13:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== June 2015 ==


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 13:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC) Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Espnscrum logo.png==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
==Orphaned non-free image File:Planet Rugby logo.gif==
]
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 14:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
== June 2015 ==
] Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to ] can easily be misinterpreted. Misplaced Pages is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. ] <small>(])</small> 15:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:30, 28 September 2024

This talk page is officially in Fiji. Welcome to Fiji.
  • currently bored
Comets Lair


Click here to leave me a new message, Click here to e-mail me


Stemoc's Discussion Page..Do whatever you want !!
Stemoc's Discussion Page
Click here to leave me a message.

Per Marc Edwards (civil engineering professor) - image was previously showing as dostorted - OK now - I had attempted to fix Pajokie (talk) 15:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)pajokie

Archive

Sky Pacific

I don't think the guide you cite applies to red categories. And I don't see what Jesus has got to do with it.Rathfelder (talk) 21:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I called you jesus because you are trying to walk on water instead of swimming across like normal people....SKy Pacific isn't the only company they own, they also own Digicel Play as well as TVWan..so a red link is justified and yes, it does apply to categories too..--Stemoc 22:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions (1 revert per 24 hours)

Stop icon
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Calibrador (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
@TomStar81: WTF??? do you even follow or understand the lasw set on that certain page Tom? I was not the one violating anything, per rule, Gage Skidmore/Calibrador is NOT allowed to change the image on that page and he did quite cunningly by replacing a different image added by someone not aware with one of his added by another..Tom if you have no idea whats happening, please keep away from the page...READ my last few edits, I was ENFORCING THE NO IMAGE CHANGE RULE, not BREAKING IT.--Stemoc 09:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
also @TomStar81: restoring the image back to the original because as per rule, NO ONE is allowed to change the image is not a violation of 1RR or 3RR, its reverting "vandalism"...read my edit summaries first, It was decided on WP:ANI that the image on that page CANNOT be changed unless it was discussed on the talk page,. It was never discussed but forcefully implemented by 3 users, one of who who reported me who is NOT allowed ot change the image on that page EVER..I reverted them telling why, if thats vandalism then please BLOCK ME INDEFINITELY cause i'd rather not be part of a site where the "Real" vandals who lie all the time never get blocked.....--Stemoc 09:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
I have moved the file on commons to a more descriptive filename. We typically do NOT want images on highly visible current event articles to change without consensus regardless of any specific policy or rule. -- A Certain White Cat 09:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Alright, I finished chasing this down and it turns out you are owed an apology. The editnote at the time I leave this message is pretty explicit about enforcing 1RR, however in a moment of wiki-failure it doesn't mention anything about the rfc's for the image to be used in the article. In the absence of that rather important information I presumed that there was a edit war here, so I blocked, which in this case was the incorrect action. Thanks to some help from your fellow editors I have chased this down and determined that I am in the wrong and you are in the right, so I have unblocked you. Please accept my sincerest apologies, and if you feel the need to report this at ANI I understand. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
@TomStar81: It was decided a while back due to the image getting changed every 2 weeks or so that unless there was "consensus", the image cannot be changed and thus since then we have only had consensus for the current image (august 2015 one) to be used, I tried to change the image back per my first edit cause snake bgd (who was unaware of the rule) changed the image to something newer, I did not see that edit. Gage Skidmore/Calibrador is prohibited from changing the image on that page so cunningly (without using edit summary), instead of changing it back to the "consenus" image, he changed it to one of his and when Wikieditorial changed it again (i knew via the edit summary), i saw the edit history and knew what happened so i changed it back to the original warning Gage to "don't change the image Gage" cause he knows he is not allowed to touch that page per a Topic Ban here and when ZiaLater changed the image again, I reverted, telling him "no one can change the image without discussion" but Gage Skidmore/Calibrador restored Zia's addition even though he is not allowed to so i rolled him back with an edit summary as a warning and then left a message on the talk page for Gage/Calibrador to "It needs to be DISCUSSED first Gage/Calibrador, stop imposing it, most of us like to follow rules and when Wikieditor undid my post, i undid his while telling him "Follow the page rule, this image CANNOT be changed without discussion" then Calibrador warned me on my page and reported me to the 1RR board and he even cited a lie there claiming there was an "attempt to resolve dispute". There wasn't any. What he linked to was me telling him not to change the image on its talk page and quote "It needs to be DISCUSSED first Gage/Calibrador, stop imposing it, most of us like to follow rules" ...so if anything Tom, its Calibrador you should be blocking who has/refused to learn as he has been reported to not one but 3 WP:Noticeboards and not once but atleast 6 times over the last 12 months for intentionally imposing his images into articles...--Stemoc 10:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
So it would seem, but I've caused enough trouble for editors here for one day. If it makes you feel better, I added a mention of the image to the current edit notice on the page (here), so hopefully we can avoid something like this happening again to other editors who are acting in good faith to keep the image there. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, another issue is that people don't understand "consensus", they think one 'other' person supporting the image they added is 'consensus" and thus add/impose that image without proper discussion, maybe a proper consensus closed by an admin would be much better outcome in the future.....--Stemoc 10:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Here's hoping. Also, thanks for the understanding over the confusion. Its unusual that people actually work with me after I make an admin level screw up, so the above lay of the land was a pleasant surprise. On the whole I have to say you handled this well, so I am honored to present you with a your own purple heart. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
For grace under fire, you are hereby award this purple heart. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Nice, Thanks, as you may have noticed, I rarely get "Gifts" on wikipedia lol.. I'll keep it in my private safe :) ..--Stemoc 10:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Admin retention

Hi Stemoc, I've been wondering how you came to the idea that "evidently, they all disappoint by becoming 'inactive' within 3-6 months". I've been compiling stats on RFA for a few years now, and while it's been a while since I looked specifically at retention, we currently have roughly as many active admins as we have had successful RFAs in the last eight years. Can I ask how you calculated that 3-6 month figure? My understanding was that admins usually have quite long wiki careers after successful RFAs. ϢereSpielChequers 21:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

What do you take into account when you talk about activity levels? from your graph it seems like you consider atleast 30 edits made in 60 days as "Active" but do you consider how many of these admins are as active as before they became admins?. Obviously an admin can make 5k deletions in a month if they choose to cause there are just so many nonsense out there but how many actually do make say consistently a thousand admin actions a month? I would judge that as being 'active' as an admin rather than 30 warnings in 60 days. If you can collect and compile that information, I'd be intrigued...you can drop it to 500 admin actions a month if necessary..We should not be collecting data on active editors, but on active admins--Stemoc 00:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
I'd agree that the definition of active is unsatisfactory, if it means anything it means active editors who happen to be admins. There have been various proposals to find some alternate way of measuring admins who are active as admins, but they usually founder on such problems as not all admin actions being logged. Our "Active admin" measure does have an advantage of consistency in that it has been measured that way for longer than I've been on the site; So it can show us trends such as us having barely half as many "active admins" as at our peak.
5,000, 1,000 even 500 logged admin actions is a level of activity, even hyperactivity that I'd say was unhealthy and at the 5,000 level could well lead to a desysop. Some deletions are so clear cut that they generate little subsequent conversation, but anyone doing a high volume of deletions is going to wind up with an awful lot of handholding of people trying to create their first article. If someone did 5,000 in two months I'd worry that they were cutting corners. Aside from the problems of sloppy tagging driving away newbies, we also need to watch out for outright vandals who first turn an article into something deletionworthy and then tag if for deletion. So doing deletion properly is time consuming. But wider than that is the argument that admins should be part of our community, and that should mean doing more non-admin stuff than admin stuff. RFA !voters have long opposed specialists who only want to do admin type things, hence the de facto requirement to have added content. There is also the issue that admins are volunteers, and though we have some retired, semi retired and unemployed editors who are volunteering hours here the equivalent of a full time job, a more normal and sustainable hobby is one that you put an evening or two into in a month, hence the threshold for counting very active editors is >100 mainspace edits a month. A thousand admin actions a month, that is an awful lot for an unpaid hobby, especially as some actions represent quite a bit of time.
I think it important that we care enough about both the admin and non admin retention to maintain stats. But I'm not keen on doing anything to imply that we only want full time volunteers. ϢereSpielChequers 16:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

The 12 Days of Misplaced Pages
On the 12th day of Christmas Jimbo sent to me
12 BLPs
11 RFAs
10 New Users
9 Barn Stars
8 Admins Blocking
7 Socks Socking
6 Clerks Clerking
5. Check Users Checking
4 Over Sighters Hiding
3 GAs
2. Did You Knows
and an ARB in a pear tree.

-May your holiday season be filled with joy, laughter and good health. --Cameron11598

Thanks

I'm about to leave this site, but I wanted to thank you for adding the images of Julia Sarah Stone. They inspired me to create an article. Took about 10 tiring hours, but I'm happy with the end result. -- James26 (talk) 06:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

@James26: These things generally work in reverse (article then image) but Good job on creating the article. It looks good, shame you are leaving, i have seen many contributors leave over the last decade..best of luck :)--Stemoc 07:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Indeed. It usually works in reverse. :) I had noticed for a while that there was no article, and when I searched for images and saw yours, I finally got inspired. Thanks for the compliment, and best of luck to you too. -- James26 (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

AN/I

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —MelbourneStar 10:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Regarding your statement at Lourdes' RfA

Stemoc Howdy in Fiji! I noticed you wrote on your support: Those Opposers; Bad!, Just terrible..... I was wondering if you would explain to me what that was supposed to mean? DO you disagree with the Oppose's reasons? Or do you think we're hardheaded haters or what? Thanks L3X1 My Complaint Desk 21:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Basically yeah, I thought the opposing reasons were quite 'silly' especially those that complain about "experience", i have been here for a decade now and i remember people who were on the wiki for less than 6 months becoming admin, so 14 month is actually pretty good and also, he has a 'CSD background' and if we are going to have admins,its best we have those who know which articles to keep and those to "delete". --Stemoc 22:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, Thanks. I saw some people on the RfA were saying things like "94% AfD rate". Do you know of an in-Wiki way to see all the XfD votes a user has made? I know there is a CSD log, but I can't find any automated lists for regular ol' AfD. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
yeah, here..--Stemoc 22:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks so much, L3X1 My Complaint Desk 23:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 British Academy Television Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Who Do You Think You Are?. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

WP:ITNC

You were right. They posted RD of Leo Baxendale which is not sourced like Vinod Khanna. I have sourced almost everything about Vinod Khanna, even gave them links of international media like TIME, BBC, CNN to make them believe that he was not a ordinary actor. --Marvellous Spider-Man 06:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm aware, they act like that there is no bias but there is, we all know that its quite close to impossible to source for older Indian movies of actors, mainly pre-90s and thus they use that as a reason to not include their deaths, i'm sure only Amitabh, Rajnikanth and the 3 Khans will get an RD (not even a blurb) once they die and no one else...as someone said, they are using RD as a way to impose WP:GA as in, if the article does not qualify for GA, it will never make the RD, That was a big slap on the face of Om Puri and many other Indian actors will follow, RD/Blurb should be based on notability, not how PRETTY their article is , fucking pathetic really...they block or bully off all the people who work on their articles so I don't think anything will change anytime soon--Stemoc 06:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Cokanasiga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Jim Hamilton

Please can you let me know why you continue to change the creative commons image on Jim Hamilton's Misplaced Pages page, despite having been twice instructed that the image is free to use?

Jim Hamilton owns his own digital media company and, as such, has creative commons portrait images he is free to use. Citing that the image used is "obviously not free" is as unhelpful as it is untrue and comparing Misplaced Pages to a religion is equally unhelpful, unwelcome and needlessly passive aggressive in nature.

No one is interested in engaging in an edit war or prolonging this tiresome exchange. Kindly leave the free to use creative commons image as is and move on.

Subclassic (talk) 07:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Subclassic

Rebecca Maders Photo at Golden Globes.

Hello, I appreciate you policing the photos. This is my photo I took with my camera. Go ahead and search to see if you find it anywhere else...Rebecca Mader, personally prefers this photo. You can send her a DM on twitter @bexmader and she will confirm. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planb88 (talkcontribs) 21:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes i'm sure you "took" that image........and you didn't "steal" it from online ..--Stemoc 21:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, this is Marc Kayne, Rebecca Mader's husband referred to in the article link you provided. This is a photo that I own, taken with my iPhone. It was first posted by myself on my Twitter account @marcuskayne on January 14, 2016. https://twitter.com/marcuskayne/status/687783087179206659 . Nobody else owns this photo. All other posts of this photo on any social media or any article used my photo. I appreciate you trying to protect the page. If you could kindly leave up the photo that I'm uploading as Rebecca prefers this photo rather than a photo taken by a fan at a comic convention. That would be much appreciated. If you would still like to verify that its actually me, DM or Tweet me on Twitter @marcuskayne. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planb88 (talkcontribs) 23:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Sure, you are the "husband" of Mader, Hi, I'm Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie's ex husband, nice to meet you..--Stemoc 00:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hey Pal, enough with the smart ass comments. I am her husband. I'm uploading a photo from the same set of pics thats never been posted. Please stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planb88 (talkcontribs) 02:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

It's him. Also retweeted by Rebecca Mader. —Guanaco 07:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

see my revert reason here If you don't know how image rights work, please do not get involved.--Stemoc 07:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Where is the full version for reference? —Guanaco 08:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
You can see a black shadow(the original crop) next to her, its Kayne and as per policy, unless the person took the image himself/herself, he/she does not own the rights to that image, the right belongs to the photographer who took the image.--Stemoc 08:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

We took about 20 pics on the red carpet that night. Please Stemco, can you just let it go. These are my photos from my iPhone 6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planb88 (talkcontribs) 08:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

By the way, the picture on the wikipedia page now is not even the same picture as you are providing the link to. This is a picture that I had not posted anywhere until today. Please compare the two photos and you can see they are not the same photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planb88 (talkcontribs) 08:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Please don't revert Rebecca Mader anymore. 3RR. We'll get the copyright question figured out, but for now it could be considered a content dispute and you risk being blocked. —Guanaco 08:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Stemoc, please let me know what you need to be satisfied on your end? These photos are mine and were taken with my iPhone. The photo you provided a link to was taken by my friend Jerry Mark who was head of security for the Golden Globes event. The other photo that I posted from the same event was taken by me. Please let me know what would satisfy you that these pictures are mine and have free license use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planb88 (talkcontribs) 16:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Rugby union

Hello. You're listed as "Cap" number 61 in this WikiProject (although, confusingly, your name is struck through). It seems that the Project's talk page is sadly neglected these days. I know little about rugby but have seen how important an active WikiProject is to getting quality information on Misplaced Pages by helping each other. If you don't mind the nudge (and you may be very active, I've not checked) please pop by the WikiProject talk page from time to time to reply to comments - or start your own. Cheers. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 00:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

@Dweller:, Yeah i no longer associate myself with an archaic project that is going backwards, for a decade now i have tried really hard to get an actual rugby union infobox going, even came up with my own version but the idiots there refuse to use a rugby union infobox and instead forcefully use the pathetic soccer ones (Caps and Goals), I'm not sure why an ENCYCLOPEDIA would use soccer options for rugby union players, i tried many many times and have failed so now i refuse to be part of such a shitty project led by people who have no interest in the project but their on selfish gains..while other similar projects have evolved including the rugby league ones, ours have devolved in the last decade or so..--Stemoc 00:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
You could try again? Hardly anyone frequents the project these days. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

NB Jonah Lomu (first one I tried) seems to have Template:Infobox rugby biography in it. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 00:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

yeah Appearance and points, this ain't soccer where there are only 2 options, rugby has tries, penalties, conversions, drop goals and then points, i made a workable one, used it in a few of the articles i wrote but was forcefully removed because it was on my userspace so that was the last straw for me, i gave this shitty project a decade. I'm done...and in the future if i do manage to create a rugby player article i will forcefully use the rugby league infobox even if the player has no league background, the rugby union infobox is sickening.--Stemoc 00:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Sounds like your option is far better. Please will you let me know where I can see it? Then I'll leave you alone ;-) --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 08:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

I used it for a while here until changes made to the "protected" sections of the infobox cause it to become odd (out of place) but it was perfect as a rugby union infobox, easier to update too...when people think Jonah Lomu, they want to know how many caps he had and how many tries he scored, the soccer one totals his tries so people are forced to use their calculator and divide the total by 5 to know the answer which makes the encyclopedia redundant lol, anyways if you want to work on it and make it better, go for it. My interest in this project completely died this year.--Stemoc 10:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

The RL version looks good: Garry Schofield. I'm whispering, because I said I'd leave you alone. Really leaving you alone now. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

French Montana

Hi User:Stemoc, can you upload an image or two that's free to use of French Montana for his article and discography article please? If you can an image for discography should be of him performing, because that's the case on discography articles.--Theo Mandela (talk) 06:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Marcus Smith (rugby player)

I undid your revision here after spotting it when it tripped a filter - the Daily Mail is discouraged as a source per WP:DAILYMAIL. If you could cite a different one, that would be better. Home Lander (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Insults not welcome

I'd recommend not calling Trump "Dumbo" per WP:BLP. From this it seems that you have been warned numerous times not to insult people. Galobtter (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

yeah But Trump is not "people" so we can insult him.--Stemoc 21:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stemoc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Black Kite (talk) 11:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at WP:ITN/C, you may be blocked from editing. Stephen 11:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Stemoc

A tag has been placed on User:Stemoc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Misplaced Pages's goals. Please note that Misplaced Pages is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dorsetonian (talk) 13:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. --NeilN 14:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:41, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

lol thanks, its obvious sane people are not qualified to contribute to wikipedia..my comment still stands as a fact....--Stemoc 22:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --John (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@John:, so you just randomly decided to block me again after the original blocking admin lifted the block citing NO reasoning or anything out of the blue?--Stemoc 09:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Not random, no. I see evidence and a consensus that right now, with your attitudes, you are not a net positive for the project. In order to be unblocked, you would need to demonstrate what you have learned and what you will change. --John (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
@John:, Ofcourse its not random, you basically blocked me 6 minutes after your friend, TRM posted on the ANI that he was not happy with me being unblocked. You are an "inactive" admin with only 10 admins actions in 2018, so yes, this is not random, just another example of what's wrong with wikipedia today...I won't back down from injustice, never have, never will.--Stemoc 22:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
I see. Well, if you wish to appeal your block, you know how to do that. Here's a link to the current AN/I discussion; your unblock request will have to address that to be successful. --John (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
john So - just to ask directly for transparency's sake, were you asked off-wiki to look at this situation or block this editor? SQL 04:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
No. --John (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, me and John are really tight and are always doing things together. Not. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I did wonder at that. If The Rambling Man and I are part of some conspiracy against you, you must admit we've kept it very discreet. --John (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Well maybe you're just one of my many sockpuppets? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
he meant "off-wiki" but looking at my page history, heh, he doth protest too much..--Stemoc 06:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Misplaced Pages coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Misplaced Pages, including the English Misplaced Pages! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Misplaced Pages, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)

Digicel Play

Proposed deletion of Digicel Play

Notice

The article Digicel Play has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Digicel Play has been rebranded as Digicel Home and has been merged with the parent company. The information from this article has been moved to the original Digicel article.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Orphaned non-free image File:Digicel play.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Digicel play.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Misplaced Pages articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Misplaced Pages, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

"A Famiy Man" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A Famiy Man. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 6#A Famiy Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 07:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

""Chris Browning"" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Chris Browning". The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 22#"Chris Browning" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ESPNscrum

Notice

The article ESPNscrum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources to meet WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Planet Rugby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planet Rugby is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Planet Rugby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Espnscrum logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Espnscrum logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Planet Rugby logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Planet Rugby logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)