| Revision as of 17:46, 29 June 2015 editBon courage (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,151 edits Warning: Edit warring on Chronic fatigue syndrome. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:43, 16 July 2015 edit undoJarold Blythe (talk | contribs)22 edits →Blocked: that's not me | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| <div style="border:1px solid black; background-color:#fefefe; padding:8px; margin:8px;"> | <div style="border:1px solid black; background-color:#fefefe; padding:8px; margin:8px;"> | ||
| == |
==Reply== | ||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| I would rather you not be blocked. ] (]) 20:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 17:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, I appreciate that. Personally, I don't want to see anyone blocked. A bit of back and forth shouldn't be an issue at all, as long as people are still talking. It's not like we'll run out of memory soon. Cheers, ] (]) 20:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked this account, per ], as well as discussions I've had with users on that project, that you are the same person as banned user ], as well as behavioural evidence of same. A ban is a ban, if you wish to return to productively editing here then please appeal your ban to Arbcom through the previously outlined process, before registering a new account. ] <sup>(])</sup> 14:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC). | |||
| :I am, however, not that person. 'The Jolly Bard' is an anagram of my real name. I would prefer to edit with the TJB account as using one's real name on Misplaced Pages, as it appears, makes one an easy target. ] (]) 18:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:43, 16 July 2015
Welcome! On this page I will discuss only content-related issues.
Reply
I would rather you not be blocked. Ward20 (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate that. Personally, I don't want to see anyone blocked. A bit of back and forth shouldn't be an issue at all, as long as people are still talking. It's not like we'll run out of memory soon. Cheers, The Jolly Bard (talk) 20:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Blocked
I have blocked this account, per this discussion on nlwiki, as well as discussions I've had with users on that project, that you are the same person as banned user User:Roadcreature, as well as behavioural evidence of same. A ban is a ban, if you wish to return to productively editing here then please appeal your ban to Arbcom through the previously outlined process, before registering a new account. Lankiveil 14:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC).
- I am, however, not that person. 'The Jolly Bard' is an anagram of my real name. I would prefer to edit with the TJB account as using one's real name on Misplaced Pages, as it appears, makes one an easy target. Jarold (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)