| Revision as of 06:25, 4 July 2015 editHandpolk (talk | contribs)1,588 edits →Handpolk is almost certainly banned User:DegenFarang← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:51, 25 December 2024 edit undoZirconium-90 (talk | contribs)46 edits →Regarding your revertion of my removal of the flags on the cultural regions of Lithuania: ReplyTag: Reply |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
<!--#REDIRECT]--> |
|
|
{{Usertalkback|icon=stop|you=notifications|me=notifications}} |
|
|
<!--{{Archive box|search=yes|]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]}}--> |
|
|
<!--Edit below this line--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Regarding your revertion of my removal of the flags on the cultural regions of Lithuania == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed you've reverted my edit in which I removed the flags, coats of arms, and the capitals on all the pages of the cultural regions of Lithuania. You did not provide a reason for this revertion. The "consensus" in some of these pages is that the flags are not official and should not be kept. Could you please provide a source which proves the officiality of the flags, arms, and capitals of these regions? Otherwise I will remove them under WP:V. ] (]) 00:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== A belated welcome! == |
|
|
|
:There is literally a website for that – (EKGT). And there are sections for each region at . As of December 2024, coat of arms of Mažoji Lietuva and Suvalkija have officially been ratified by the President of Lithuania (coat of arms of Aukštaitija, Dzūkija and Žemaitija are ratified by EKGT but need to be altered to comply with laws before President ratifies them), while flags have been ratified by EKGT. In addition, there are sources in those files' descriptions (flag and coats of arms). Meanwhile, the proclaimed capitals of each region are rather symbolic but I do not see a reason to not on list them either. Your claim of {{tq|The consensus in the talk pages of some of the other pages for these regions seems to be to remove them|q=yes}} is not true, because there are no discussions about that on any of these regions' talk pages so you should stop with fake claims. ] is not a justification to add or remove something just because the same is done in some other page or pages. – ] 05:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::You should then insert the source into the pages because it's hard to get information about this. ] (]) 09:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
]]]Here's wishing you a ] ], Sabbatino. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for ]. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Misplaced Pages: |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Also, when you post on ] you should ] using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. |
|
|
|
|
|
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on {{#if: Lukeno94|]|my talk page}}, consult ], or place {{tl|helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. |
|
|
|
|
|
Again, welcome! ] ] 12:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disambiguation link notification for April 24== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disambiguation link notification for May 1== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disambiguation link notification for September 7== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Monster Magnet and heavy metal == |
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding , I (not to mention the band itself) personally agree with you that Monster Magnet isn't a heavy metal band, but it seems that ] and established consensus here on Misplaced Pages do not. That is, the band is often categorized as a heavy metal band by music retailers and the music industry press. Indeed, most news coverage of this band (not to mention coverage of the album in question) comes from heavy metal magazines. And here on Misplaced Pages Monster Magnet albums appear in other lists of heavy metal albums. I think that in order for your reversion to stand we'd need to establish a new community consensus here. ] (]) 21:15, 10 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:Those magazines aren't "metal only". For example, ] or ]. They write news about metal and rock artists, but their main subject is metal-related music. That doesn't automatically make every band there a "metal" band. Now does it? If they write something about ] or ] and someone is willing to add them to ] or some other "xxxx in heavy metal music" page, I'm just going to delete it. Or we could find a compromise and let people add these kind of artists to ] page, but make a strong claim so people would abstain from adding such bands to ] and newer pages concerning ].—] (]) 08:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::I agree that coverage in heavy metal press doesn't automatically make a band a heavy metal band; I was just offering this as one explanation for the widespread (but IMHO mistaken) belief that Monster Magnet is a heavy metal band. But there's no point in keeping the band off ''individual'' heavy metal lists on Misplaced Pages; this is something which needs to be implemented across the board or not at all. Otherwise we end up with strange and glaring inconsistencies, such as their appearance in about a dozen of the previous " in heavy metal music" lists but not on ], etc. Since removing Monster Magnet from these lists and other heavy metal–themed articles would affect a large number of pages, would you be interested in starting an ] to establish a new community consensus? —] (]) 08:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Sorry, but I don't really have time to start any ] at this time. You can start it if you want.—] (]) 09:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::::OK, then. I don't have time either so I'll just restore the edit for now in line with the prior consensus. —] (]) 11:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
Hi Sabbatino. I see that you've reverted the edit again, this time with the rationale that the entry is unsourced. However, you seem content with leaving over a dozen similarly unsourced entries in the list. I understand that you disagree with the band's widely accepted genre classification here, but selective enforcement of our content guidelines isn't a particularly good way of addressing the problem. I've re-added the entry, this time with reliable sources supporting both the album release and the genre. —] (]) 17:47, 13 September 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 2014 in heavy metal music == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Sabbatino, |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reflections on my edits, much appreciated. I know Devilment is not on Wiki yet, but it is a band fronted by ], so I am quite sure it will be picked up as soon as their career or catalogue becomes a bit more substantial. And I don;t think someone will bother to edit this particular list again when building the new Wiki for Devilment. So I did that as an encouragement to anyone who could gather the info to show objective readers they belong here. But I am receptive to arguments. Cheers, --] (]) 08:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
:No problem. I always remove content which is not on Misplaced Pages. That content can be added again, once a page for that band or something else gets created on Misplaced Pages.—] (]) 14:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disambiguation link notification for February 5== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Recent Reversions == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, you recently reverted all my edits on ], ] and ] could you please give me a proper explanation why you think my edits were "unnecessary" and "screw up the whole article"? |
|
|
] (]) 23:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:Why do you remove information regarding UK/US? World doesn't consist of only Europe. You can undo me reversions, but only IF you promise to include UK/US release dates and US record label. ] (]) 13:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==] nomination of ]== |
|
|
] |
|
|
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} |
|
|
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> — <tt>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></tt> \\ 04:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== May 2015 == |
|
|
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">] ]</i> 20:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Are you trying to predict the future? No teams shall be added unless they actually have qualified. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">] ]</i> 20:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::I was writing a message on your talk page, but I guess I'll just write here. Those teams that I added qualified. If you have doubts then go check those leagues' websites. ] (]) 20:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::I am watching Serie A right now and Napoli can still reach Champions League, it is 10 minutes left. And none of the Greek teams have the round decided as they may finish everything between 3rd and 5th. We already have notes for teams that have qualified but not decided what round they will play in. Greek teams may not be decided until next sunday. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">] ]</i> 20:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Then I guess Serie A's website likes to mistaken people, because it states that all teams already played 38 games each. ] (]) 20:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::::It is a "live table" with current matches included. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif">] ]</i> 20:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::::I didn't know that. Thanks for explaining. ] (]) 20:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Country names== |
|
|
Country names shouldn't be linked unless they are likely to be misunderstood, confused with another country or unknown to the average reader. Therefore many defunct countries are linked. Hungary and Poland are not defunct countries – you're talking about official names, names by which no average person called these countries, and these names are not relevant to articles about racing drivers. In the 80s, 99.9% of English speakers referred to Hungary and Poland as Hungary and Poland, and we stick to common names outside articles where these formal titles are relevant. For the same reasons, in the Schumacher article for example, we refer to West Germany, and not the Federal Republic of Germany. Cheers, ] (]) 17:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:I didn't really knew such things as my country was under communist-rule after WWII. But when thinking about that, we also called every country by they short forms no matter what. So I kinda punched myself in the face when I made those edits. Thanks anyway and I'll keep that in mind before making an edit next time. ] (]) 17:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::Hey, no problem. Nobody knows everything ;) ] (]) 17:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Hey== |
|
|
No where in that thing do I insult you. The dashes are not needed in the icons as they are personal tastes themselves. One little change and it goes revert crazy. ] (]) 09:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I didn't say that you insulted me. I said that in general as your last message to me (''Get off my talk page and leave me alone.'') was rude and could lead to insults. If you want to make huge edits then you should first start a conversation on that article's talk page and if a consensus is reached then be it. ] (]) 11:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure you mean well, but just so you know, is not vandalism. In New York City we often treat the borough as if it were a city, and indeed this is how they are referred to by mailing address. E.g. your address would 123 Main St, Brooklyn, NY, not New York, NY. Other articles also seem to follow the same pattern, such as ] (Brooklyn), or ] (Queens). We should probably take to the ] to discuss this further, but I just wanted to ask you to be more careful about labeling edits as vandalism, as it can be a deterrent to new users. At the very least, try to ]. Best <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">] <sup>]</sup></span></span> 01:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Golden State Warriors == |
|
|
|
|
|
I find it very strange that mixed in a bunch of other productive and helpful edits, you decided to vandalize ], while calling your edit reverting vandalism, by removing mention of their title from the lede. Do not make that or similar edits in the future or you may be blocked. ] (]) 12:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Current season for NHL pages == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. I see you have reverted some changes on what the current NHL season is. This is currently being discussed on the ]. Please come join the discussion ]. -- ] (]) 23:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for the heads up. I certainly will! – ] (]) 07:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 2015 Basketball Hall of Fame inductees == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I've initiated a discussion at ] in which you might be interested. Cheers. ] (]) 21:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Warning== |
|
|
|
|
|
] This is your '''only warning'''; if you make ] on other people again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.<!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> |
|
|
|
|
|
:Additional personal attacks on ] and ]. ] ] 11:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::You may wish to familiarize yourself with ]. If you run around reporting me, that is almost certainly what is going to happen to you, given all of your personal attacks, edit warring etc. ] ] 14:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::There were no personal attacks. My edits were legit. You reverted all vandalisms that I removed. And I'll report you again if you keep harassing me. Take care, troll. – ] (]) 14:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Calling me a troll is a personal attack. Telling me I have no reading comprehension is a personal attack. I fear your career on Misplaced Pages is about to come to an end as you seem to have no interest in editing collaboratively or ceasing your personal attacks. ] ] 14:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::You're the one who called me a troll first. Don't worry, you're already reported. I'm in Misplaced Pages for a lot longer than you and I know what I can do and what I can't. And looks like your days are over as you keep harassing me and vandalise all articles that I made edits to. – ] (]) 14:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Your report was denied. They said you should take it to ANI. Acting in good faith, I should warn you that if you do that, it's highly likely ]. However as somebody who is pretty fed up with your personal attacks and other nonsense, I wouldn't loose much sleep over it if you did. ] ] 15:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== This is not vandalism == |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: . A good faith content dispute is not vandalism. Please do not characterize it as such. ]] 14:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:A good faith edit is when there's a source. And furthermore, that edit is not relevant. Who cares if that player is first from his country to be drafted into NHL. You don't see other players from their countries to be mentioned in articles as the ''first to be drafted from country X.'' That user keeps reverting everything I edit and harasses me everywhere. I already reported him and I hope it won't take long until he's banned/blocked from editing. – ] (]) 15:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::"{{xt|Who cares if that player is first from his country to be drafted into NHL.}}" I do, for one. I found that very interesting. Given that you also thought the Warriors winning the NBA Finals was not a relevant addition to that article, it might be best if you just stuck to what the RS's say in the future, rather than using your own ] on what is or isn't relevant. ] ] 15:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Handpolk, Sabbatino does seem to have merit to his claim that you are following him around reverting a lot of stuff. Included in that is , which appears to be you re-inserting a ''dead link'' in place of the official team website. So no, you do not appear to be occupying a high ground either. In fact, you both seem to be edit warring across multiple articles right now, and I suggest you both stop. (As an aside, something like is just terribly formatted, and like I suggest below, the proper course when an addition like that is challenged is to discuss whether the addition is appropriate on a talk page.) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::That said, Sabbatino, his revert in this particular case still isn't vandalism, obvious or otherwise. Nor is your dispute on the 2015 NBA Hall of Fame class. These are mere editing disagreements, and the solution to them is to solicit more feedback via the article or project talk pages and try to build a consensus. ]] 15:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I respect your view that his claims have merit. Mine do as well. ] ] 00:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::I'm not the one who started the edit war. He started making personal attacks and saying that I started everything. But no worries as he was reported. – ] (]) 16:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== July 2015 == |
|
|
] Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as ] are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can ]. Please read ] for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notvand --> ] <small>(])</small> 22:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:You mean adding to ] that the Golden State Warriors won the ] is not vandalism? ] ] 00:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::You should stop escalating a conflict for nothing. Except if you have ] then I understand why you're so hurt over nothing ('''''no pun intended'''''). – ] (]) 08:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::. Not when somebody cites with sources that a team just won a World Championship on the article of that team. ] ] 08:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Yes. However, I consider unsourced material as vandalism unless there's a {{citation needed}} inserted. – ] (]) 09:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::And you are wrong. ] just warned you about doing that and you need to stop. You don't get to redefine vandalism. Just add the citation needed tag yourself. ] ] 09:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::I got no warnings from ]. – ] (]) 16:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Sabbatino, unsourced material is not vandalism. Please stop characterizing it as such. ]] 16:46, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Some of the unsourced material IS vandalism. By that I mean that '''clearly trivial things''' are vandalism. – ] (]) 16:51, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::No, that is not vandalism either. What is "clearly trivial" to you is not necessarily trivial to others. If you remove something as trivial, note it as such and invite people to discuss on the talk page. If they revert you, then again, take it to the talk page or to a project talk page. Please stop labeling it as vandalism. ]] 16:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::You mean to say that is not vandalism? This is completely trivial and it's clearly vandalism. – ] (]) 16:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::No, I am saying that is not vandalism. Your example is vandalism, but mine is simply trivia. ]] 17:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::Your example is trivia which is '''true'''. While mine example is trivia ''which has no sources to back it up''. Next time I'll add {{citation needed}} to such sentences/paragraphs/etc. as your example. – ] (]) 17:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::That would be fine. Thanks! ]] 17:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::No problem. – ] (]) 17:54, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
|
I have noticed you've reverted my edit in which I removed the flags, coats of arms, and the capitals on all the pages of the cultural regions of Lithuania. You did not provide a reason for this revertion. The "consensus" in some of these pages is that the flags are not official and should not be kept. Could you please provide a source which proves the officiality of the flags, arms, and capitals of these regions? Otherwise I will remove them under WP:V. Zirconium-90 (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
