Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/New Jersey: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:33, 3 August 2006 editKacie Jane (talk | contribs)13,639 edits Browsing order: User:Northenglish/Sandbox2← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:47, 23 January 2012 edit undoDough4872 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers139,352 edits Redirected page to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads 
(219 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{shortcut|]}}
==New page I started==

Its not big yet.Please help.] 19:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

]

:Thanks for your effort. We used to have two different pages for 500 and 600 series county routes, but it was decided to merge them into a single page at ]. Thus, I'd like to merge the information you've provided here into that page as well. -- ] (]) -- 20:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

== New proposal for county routes ==

I've made a new proposal for what we do with county routes. Since this page hasn't seen all that much action yet, I've put it on ] instead. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

==Browsing order==
Northenglish is including every route - unsuffixed, suffixed, bannered, etc - in the browsing. This leads to issues of ordering - does S1A come before or after US 1 Alternate? Does 9 come before or after US 9W? I propose the following:
*Only add unsuffixed and unbannered routes to the browse box, with rare exceptions. Those exceptions are mainly routes that were not numbered because of their supposed "parent". So for instance ], which was part of ], unrelated to post-1927 ], would be included.
*Other routes would not have a browse box. I can easily add code to the infobox to not show the browse box if there is the arguments are blank.
*Those routes with no browse box would instead have a link to the parent, either in the infobox or in see also.
*Routes with children would have those children listed in see also.
Any comments? --] (] - ]) 01:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

:See ]. This is the order I've been working on. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 01:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:47, 23 January 2012

Redirect to: