| Revision as of 03:29, 14 August 2015 editNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,664 edits →?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:53, 16 December 2024 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,179 edits →Edit request: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (208 intermediate revisions by 82 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| | age = 90 | | age = 90 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{ |
{{archives|banner=yes|list=|small=yes|prefix=|root=}} | ||
| <!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox" | <!-- {| class="standard-talk messagebox" | ||
| | align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | | align="center" style="width:53px;"|] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 125K | |maxarchivesize = 125K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 41 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
| |algo = old(90d) | |algo = old(90d) | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == The ICC Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| == I need to get in touch with nattyrbumpo about hisncherokee wars article == | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You deserve it. | |||
| |} | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| Please contact ame at genws@hiwaay.net. I would like to ask about the sources for a couple of your statements.I am sure there is a better way of doing this on Misplaced Pages but I am new to it. Bob Davis```` | |||
| :Please feel free to email me at ] and explain further, but right now I have no idea what this is about. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Regarding Fernando Otero's article - your edit in August 2011 == | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Dear Nuclearwarfare | |||
| Hope you are very well. I'm writing to you regarding your edit on Fernando Otero's article in August 2011. I've added references. Please let me know if it's necessary to add more. Thank you so much :-) Victoria Plebs ] (]) 03:33, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for letting me know. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Arbitration motion regarding ''Arbitration enforcement'' == | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| {{Ivmbox|1=By ], the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately: | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| #The case is to be opened forthwith and entitled "Arbitration enforcement"; | |||
| #During the case, no user who has commented about this matter on the ], the ] or the ], may take or initiate administrative action involving any of the named parties in this case. | |||
| #Reports of alleged breaches of (2) are to be made only by email to the Arbitration Committee, via the ].}} | |||
| You are receiving this message because you have {{tq|commented about this matter on the ], the ] or the ]}} and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' (] / ] / ]) via ] (]) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:L235@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:L235/sandbox2&oldid=669107070 --> | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| == Change from announced time table for the ] arbitration case == | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| ''You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the '']'' arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the ] or ] discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at ].'' The drafters of the ] arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close '''5 July 2015''', one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close '''26 July 2015''', one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted '''9 August 2015''', two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, ] (]) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:L235@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration_enforcement/Notification_list&oldid=669397396 --> | |||
| == Motion passed in AE arbitration case granting amnesty and rescinding previous temporary injunction == | |||
| This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk ] via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on ] and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case. | |||
| On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted: | |||
| {{Ivmbox|1=<ol type= 1><li>Paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Arbitration Committee's ] about the injunction and reporting breaches of it are hereby rescinded. | |||
| <li>The Arbitration Committee hereby declares an amnesty covering:<ol type =a> | |||
| <li>the original comment made by Eric Corbett on 25 June 2015 and any subsequent related comments made by him up until the enactment of this current motion; and | |||
| <li> the subsequent actions related to that comment taken by Black Kite, GorillaWarfare, Reaper Eternal, Kevin Gorman, GregJackP and RGloucester before this case was opened on 29 June 2015.</ol></ol>}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Penwhale@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration_enforcement/Notification_list&oldid=669516304 --> | |||
| ==My RfA== | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" |{{#switch:{{lc:Oppose}} | |||
| |support= ] | |||
| |neutral= ] | |||
| |oppose = ] | |||
| |] | |||
| }} | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |<center><u><big>'''Pavlov's RfA reward'''</big></u></center>{{Break}} | |||
| Thank for !voting at my recent ]. You voted '''Oppose''' so you get {{#switch:{{lc:Oppose}} | |||
| |support= a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven! | |||
| |neutral= a reasonable two cookies, just cooling off. | |||
| |oppose= only one cookie, but a nice one. (Better luck next time.) | |||
| | ... to have a cookie anyway. | |||
| }}{{Break}} | |||
| All the best: ''] ]'',<small> 19:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC).</small><br /> | |||
| |} | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| == Franklin child prostitution ring allegations == | |||
| ] | |||
| It's now been over a year since you indefinitely fully protected ]. Do you think it can be unprotected now? ] (]) 21:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, certainly. {{done|Unprotected}}. I'll keep it watchlisted though. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 22:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == Sarah Palin == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| To set the record straight, the topic ban 3.5 years ago is because many reliable sources say that Palin's death panel remarks didn't quite fact-check, | |||
| and you apparently think they do, based on zero references that you chose to mention in those 3.5 years. If you believe in death panels that much, you | |||
| have a right to your opinion. You don't have a right to intimidate, threaten and censor, regardless of how strongly you feel. Editors such as yourself used mass censorship for years to portray Palin as never having said a single word about death panels. Now you allow that she said two words about death panels, and said much more about foreign policy. | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| I don't expect anything I say to change what you say or do, just setting the record straight about what we both know about the honesty of your opinions.] (]) 18:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, you're right that I'm not going to change anything I say or do based on this comment. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 19:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Alakzi == | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| ] is one of the most helpful, bright, thinking and even mind-reading editors I had the pleasure to know here, --] (]) 22:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| == Reccomendations == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| I put this on the users page but it was reverted so I'll just diff it here in case you didn't see ]. ] (]) 22:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Hey, NW, you around? I'm pretty sure this isn't sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry, for reasons I outline at the SPI. I saw you say, at Alakzi's talk page: "For the record, I am perfectly comfortable with another administrator reversing this block if they feel the behavioral evidence isn't strong enough." But if you're around I'd like to discuss for a minute or two first. --] (]) 23:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : I'm on mobile for the next few hours but should be on my laptop again soon after. If we can't connect in four hours go ahead and unblock. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 23:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| ::I'm not going to be around in 4 hours - need my beauty sleep - so we won't be able to connect then. I'd love to try to straighten this out before then, as I'm probably off-wiki much of tomorrow. Let me see what Mike V says from his CU, but I'm probably going to unblock unless there's a surprise. If I end up wrong you can laugh and point at me and I'll owe you a beer. OK? --] (]) 23:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| :::Also, won't be a straight unblock for Alakzi, will talk first, as he/she does seem to have gone over the edge a little. --] (]) 23:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| ::::Yeah, looking at it a little more I can totally see how I misinterpreted the evidence to see what I was expecting to see. I was very unhappy with the rape comparison and made my interpretation of the editing histories fit what I expected. Your explanation is a lot more rational than mine. Feel free to work it out and then unblock. I'm still on mobile and I'm not fully clear what I'm next going to be on Misplaced Pages. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 02:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| === ? === | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi NW, ] just came to my attention and I felt obliged to comment, although I'm quite short on time at the moment. I've participated, briefly, in the ] that started all of the current drama, and am familiar with the users involved. I was surprised to see an SPI started (by the author of the essay in question, who was going to essentially get his way on the matter in any case), not very surprised to see the discussion there escalate, and ''shocked'' to see a ] block of a productive editor who is obviously feeling distressed, frustrated, and railroaded by the way he has been treated recently. Yes, the comments at the SPI are over the top, but to call someone who's been a productive member of the community for months "not here" because he made inappropriate comments in a frustrating situation is entirely wrong, and does not seem to have come from a thorough understanding of the context. (For one thing, just look at the history of the article the two users collaborated on - the sock thing is clearly specious.) | |||
| == Edit request == | |||
| Honestly, this is the first situation I've encountered since returning to Misplaced Pages this past January in which I felt this uncomfortable with the way another user was treated. If I had the time right now to manage the resulting potential drama I may well have unblocked already. {{ec}} <small>after getting distracted IRL with this window open for while</small> Oh, I'm glad to see others have stopped by with similar comments; I should be around 4-6 hours from now and will follow up then if things haven't been sorted out. ] (]) 23:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change<br/> | |||
| === Response to all === | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></nowiki></code> | |||
| I apologize for the mess that's been made. I'm back home now (though about to go to bed) and have had a chance to review everything in a little more detail. I think that Dirtlawyer is right: I definitely overreacted to that post; read Alakzi not trying to get involved further as being sneaky and evasive; read the as something that only a troll would do. Someone mentioned that it reminded them of a now-banned and un-CheckUserable individual acted—I had been thinking exactly that. All the warning signs after that seemed like they were pointing in the same direction. It appears that I was very wrong, and I wanted to apologize for the overly hasty administrative block, ]. | |||
| <br/>to<br/> | |||
| <code><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></nowiki></code> | |||
| that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! ] (]) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| To whomever asked about the block length: even absent the sockpuppetry suspicion, the block would have been of indefinite duration as per ]. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 03:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:53, 16 December 2024
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
The ICC Barnstar
|
The International Criminal Court Barnstar of National Merit | |
| You deserve it. |
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of National Association of Colleges and Employers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Association of Colleges and Employers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/National Association of Colleges and Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Sdkb 05:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit request
Hello, Would you be willing to correct a syntax error on your userpage? You have a missing span closing tag with your toolserver link and it's reporting as an HTML misnested tag error. If you'd change
<span class="plainlinks">
to
<span class="plainlinks"></span>
that will fix it. Thank you and happy holidays! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)