| Revision as of 23:20, 23 August 2015 editCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →Shapps: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024 edit undoCarlesFort (talk | contribs)24 edits →Edit page - Legatum Institute: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (484 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * }} | * }} | ||
| == Headline is clear - I followed it exactly == | |||
| ⚫ | == Notice == | ||
| '''Lord Sewell resigns and faces police inquiry after 'snorting cocaine with prostitutes' ''' | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| Is the headline for the story involved. I fear your claim that I "rewrote" the headline is wrong, and the claim that I misspelled the name is also wrong. I would ask that you note your edit summaries '''Misplaced Pages editors have no business pretending to be headline writers for newspapers they're not employed by''' and '''nor should they introduce spelling errors into people's names...) ''' appear to be simple ad hominem attacks here. | |||
| You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| makes the headline absolutely clear -- I would kindly ask you to apologize for your attack on me. Cheers. ] (]) 13:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't misquote me, Collect: I did not use the word "rewrote". And in fact you did misspell this person's name. Please show more care in regard to BLPs. ] (]) 13:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Then what did you mean by me "pretending" to be the headline writer? And (expletive) - did you actually read the headline spelling of his name on the Telegram web site headline before accusing ME of being the person who misspelled his name? Really? And somehow ''I'' am the person who wrote the web page for The Telegram? Really? You are digging your attack deeper and deeper here. All I ask for is a ''simple apology'' for the edit summaries. ] (]) 16:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::You know perfectly well that you altered the headline, presenting it differently from the true version appearing on the newspaper's website. I really don't see what you hope to gain by pretending otherwise. As for misspellings, you've now added another one: it's the Telegraph, not the Telegram. ] (]) 17:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Wow. My uncle worked for the Telegram-Gazette and I suppose that stuck in my mind as I am not a fan of newspapers with sensational headlines. Before I fixed the headline, it was claimed to be "''title=Lord Sewel resigns after 'snorting cocaine with two prostitutes ''" which I trust you agree was actually ''wrong'' as that was not the headline. Would you have kept the earlier incorrect version of the headline? And do you concede that the misspelling was by the Telegraph? Cheers. ] (]) 18:36, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| (outdent) I'm not sure how or why I was chosen to be the policeman of these edit summaries, which is a nomination I decline; but I will say I am not sure why this article would need to contain a quotation from a newspaper headline. Regards, ] (]) 22:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| :I've noticed that Collects sometimes informs you about situations he doesn't like; no idea why he has chosen you for this burden. As for the article: it doesn't contain (as part of the text) a quotation from a newspaper headline; it only contains the newspaper headline in the reference/footnote. The key is, the headline is now given correctly, as opposed to the incorrect version Collect had entered. ] (]) 22:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I gave the entire first part of the headline ''verbatim'' as being sufficient to identify the source - until then an absolutely ''incorrect'' version was in the cite. And I note you still do not accept that I spelt the name ''precisely as the headline spelt the name'' - and thus I did not make an error on it. Cheers. And by the way, I am not a plural last I checked. ] (]) 02:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :::I suggest closing your eyes and thinking of water, ducks and backs. All the best: ''] ]'',<small> 15:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC).</small><br /> | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| ==Singer's talk page discussion== | |||
| On where would you suggest I give my input? I was going to add it to the "Threaded discussion" section but then I would be replicating what was already above, as I would have again gone through and explained each of my contributions. Thanks, ] (]) 14:38, 4 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| == Mark Regnerus Article == | |||
| To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| Hello I have made additional comment/suggestion on this article, could you please review and comment? Thanks... ] (]) 00:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Please avoid edit comments such as this and this | |||
| You reverted my edit without contributing to the talk page, then advise me to use the talk page. I already explained my view in the talk page so therefore you should go there and talk before reverting. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Yes, you're right -- just ran out of time earlier. ] (]) 20:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration Enforcement notice == | |||
| == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | |||
| ] | |||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. | |||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice-->Hi, I am the mediator for a case that you were listed in, please come to this page: Thanks <span>''']'''<sup>''']'''</sup></span> 08:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| == Susya delete == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| You deleted material from ] while a discussion is taking place on the talk page. Please join it before you delete again. ] (]) 06:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The source very carefully avoids accusing Shapps of any wrongdoing ... which we ought well follow. The current use makes it quite appear that the living person operated an illegal pyramid scheme. Which is not claimed in the source given. No charges brought, and so no reason to maintain this bit in a BLP IMO. ] (]) 23:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| ] | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Edit page - Legatum Institute == | |||
| ] | |||
| Good morning, colleague, | |||
| I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "''whose sock are you?''" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it. | |||
| I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them. | |||
| Thank you very much. | |||
| <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> ] (]) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 20 December 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit comments such as this and this
Arbitration Enforcement notice
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Edit page - Legatum Institute
Good morning, colleague,
I noticed that you reverted my contributions with a "whose sock are you?" in the edit summary. I would like to have a constructive and respectful discussion, and I believe we could talk on the article's discussion page about how we can improve it.
I think Misplaced Pages is a space for respect and community building. Therefore, I would appreciate it if, instead of reverting my changes, we could talk about them.
Thank you very much.