Revision as of 03:33, 10 September 2015 editJohnbod (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers280,340 edits →Archiving: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:01, 23 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,279,122 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WPMED}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(84 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi | date = 17 November 2015 | result = '''keep''' | page = Positions of medical organizations on electronic cigarettes}} | |||
{{talkheader}} | {{talkheader}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= | |||
{{Ecig sanctions}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Medicine|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
⚫ | {{ |
||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 1 | ||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
⚫ | |algo = old(180d) | ||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
⚫ | |archive = Talk:Positions of medical organizations on electronic cigarettes/Archive %(counter)d | ||
⚫ | |algo = old( |
||
⚫ | |archive = Talk:Positions of medical organizations |
||
}} | }} | ||
{{Archives |bot=MiszaBot I |age= |
{{Archives |bot=MiszaBot I |age=180 |units=days}} | ||
== On the apparent article slant == | |||
== Archiving == | |||
It's pretty obvious why the CDCs "vaping" illness has been brought into this article. But you're gonna need a better rationale on not clarifying the distinction between e-cigarettes and THC vaping. And it's not overly becoming of an encyclopedia to assist in conflating the terminology. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
The archiving of this page has been far too sudden. Blanking the page is not normal on WP. Please ask on the talk page before doing this again, QG. Clearing out the page just encourages people to raise the same issues again and again. ] (]) 03:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Now that the CDC has admitted that the primary cause aren't nicotine products, why is it all of a sudden not documentation-worthy? You can clearly come up with a neat euphemism to sugarcoat the CDCs "new findings" and "research breakthrough" - as if it wasn't clear 3 months / 30 deaths ago. | |||
== Germany == | |||
What's the thought process behind featuring the 2013 article on cigalikes/ego-class devices? And why cherrypick concerns from halfway in, instead of the actual conclusions? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Latest revision as of 20:01, 23 February 2024
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Positions of medical organizations on electronic cigarettes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Archives | |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
On the apparent article slant
It's pretty obvious why the CDCs "vaping" illness has been brought into this article. But you're gonna need a better rationale on not clarifying the distinction between e-cigarettes and THC vaping. And it's not overly becoming of an encyclopedia to assist in conflating the terminology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.52.13.108 (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Now that the CDC has admitted that the primary cause aren't nicotine products, why is it all of a sudden not documentation-worthy? You can clearly come up with a neat euphemism to sugarcoat the CDCs "new findings" and "research breakthrough" - as if it wasn't clear 3 months / 30 deaths ago.
Germany
What's the thought process behind featuring the 2013 article on cigalikes/ego-class devices? And why cherrypick concerns from halfway in, instead of the actual conclusions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.52.13.108 (talk) 22:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Categories: