Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cebr1979: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:09, 10 October 2015 view sourceCebr1979 (talk | contribs)10,843 edits Photos← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:19, 16 February 2023 view source MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(191 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Sockpuppet investigation==
{{div col|3}}
{{Ivmbox
<center>{{User email}}</center>
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into ] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at ], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.{{#if:|&nbsp;]]<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> 21:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)}}
{{div col end}}
|]
}} ]]<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> 21:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


== ]: Voting now open! ==
== Photos ==

Hi, ], <br>
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Cebr1979. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
I saw your comment about an editor replacing okay images with ones of lesser quality. Please read ], it might provide some helpful advice for you. <font face="Papyrus" size="3" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 00:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

:Hi ]. Thank you however, as seen , I did attempt that and it did nothing to bring the old photo back. Unfortunately, ] appears to be useless when dealing with photos.] (]) 00:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
::Well, if an editor makes a lousy edit, you are free to revert it (but not edit-war) and if the editor wants it back in, the issue needs to be discussed on the article talk page. <font face="Papyrus" size="3" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 00:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

:::Hi ]. I'm fully aware of that. Unfortunately, when dealing with photos, reverting doesn't do anything. It doesn't bring the old photo back.] (]) 00:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
::::An image is just a file name. Unless the file is deleted, the image still exists. Go into edit on a previous version of the page with the better photo and save that version. <font face="Papyrus" size="3" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 01:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
:::::No, ]. You are incorrect. I am telling you: '''Nothing brings the old photo back. It has to be re-uploaded.''' Even going to a permalink, is useless. Case in point: ]: & . Both the same photo. and . Both are the same because '''there is not a way to get an old photo back - it must be re-uploaed.''' ] is useless when dealing with photos. Everything and anything other than re-uploading the old photo as a replacement for the new photo is useless on wikipedia.] (]) 01:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/44&oldid=750786920 -->
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
{{Tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = ]
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing for ]{{#if:]|&#32;per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. '''] ]''' 05:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}

Latest revision as of 22:19, 16 February 2023

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Cebr1979, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.

ElectricBurst(Zaps) 21:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cebr1979. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Cebr1979. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)