| Revision as of 01:10, 9 August 2006 editYellowMonkey (talk | contribs)86,443 edits →extremely Biased blocking By bishonen: comment on 3RR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:50, 30 June 2012 edit undoOxfordwang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers5,436 editsm Reverted edits by 151.151.109.8 (talk) identified as personal attack on another user (HG) | ||
| (495 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| : February 2006 - May 2006 ; | : February 2006 - May 2006 ; | ||
| : June 2006 - July 2006 | : June 2006 - July 2006 ; | ||
| : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; | |||
| : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; | |||
| : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; | |||
| : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; | |||
| : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; | |||
| : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; | |||
| :Till Feb 29th 2008; | |||
| :Till April 15th 2008; | |||
| :Till June 20th 2008; | |||
| :Till August 5th 2008; | |||
| :Till October 20th 2008; | |||
| : Till November 25th 2009; | |||
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
| == Welcome back == | |||
| Hi BV, | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Welcome back. Hope you'll have a constructive time here. All the best. --] (]) 07:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You are most welcome. --] (]) 17:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| This is a message to all ] | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| I want your opinion on this particular person ]. He claims to be a famous singer in Kerala. Now being a Malayalee, I have not heard of this person before, so I wonder whether or not you have heard of him before and set this issue straight. If so, then please let your opinion be counted at ]. Please note that by voicing your opinion as a Malayalee/Keralite will add more weight to your words. | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you.<!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 09:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Many Thanks | |||
| --] 21:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Romila Thapar == | |||
| :Hello Bharatveer. Like I said on the AfD, I really havent heard of him before. Perhaps it is because all the movies he has sung in are old ones. Also, there are so many "all-India" competitions happening all the time on different television channels. Winning such a competition does not make him notable enough to deserve his own page.<br>Now Pradeeps has sung in nearly 5 movies. That is more than enough to merit an article on wiki. However, he really isnt all that famous, IMO. Hence my usage of the word "quasi". --]<sup>a.k.a.D<font color="green">]</font>epu<font color="white"> </font>Joseph |<font color="green">]</font></sup>13:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Tomorrow - I promise! --] <small>(])</small> 02:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Yesuds - Role Models == | |||
| == Note == | |||
| Could you please modify the Role models in the article ] | |||
| Rgds | |||
| Jyothish ] 14:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please see ]. ] (]) 11:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| You've been banned by the Misplaced Pages community. If you'd like to edit again, you may appeal. Please contact ] if you'd like your situation reviewed. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I referred lot of article before adding Role models. There I read about Balamuralikrishna and Rafi. | |||
| thanks ] 10:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==External links reverted== | |||
| Some external links on this page seem to have been automatically changed by an overenthusiastic proxy sever. I am changing this back to prevent the links being followed by mistake, and apologize for popping the new-message banner up; see the end of ] for the explanation. You can disregard this message. --] 16:04, 4 August 2006 (]]]) | |||
| == dab contributions == | |||
| He did a lot work in rgvedic dieties section under the hindu mythology cat.--] 06:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :stop harassing me. I am not anti-Hindu or anti-Indian: I have no interest in Indian politics, and only limited interest in contemporary Hinduism. I would just like to contribute to articles on ancient Indo-Iranian texts in peace, and in accordance with academic mainstream. If you think that scholarly discussion of the history of India and Hinduism is "anti-Indian" or "anti-Hindu", that is entirely your own problem. ] <small>]</small> 14:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Witzel runs away from scholarly discussion. Look at the . Scholars are "appalled at the level of visceral feelings Witzel holds against some of the scholars in the field". Witzel IS ANTI-Hindu and ANTI-Indian. ]%% 15:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Witzel is fiercly anti-Hindutva. If you think that this equals "anti-Hindu" or even "anti-India" (so "India" equals crackpot nationalism now??), you have a seriously distorted view. That's like saying being anti-Bush is being anti-American (which has been said, of course, same old "who isn't for us is against us"). Why are you bringing up Witzel? I didn't refer to the Witzel article. I am not Witzel, and I have never met him. I am not keeping you from documenting the controversies surrounding the man, as long as you stay ''fair'' and within ]. A man may have a bad temper and political tendencies, and still be a brilliant scholar, and I am protecting the Witzel article against all-too transparent attempts at conflating politics and scholarship. | |||
| :::so don't change the subject. I am asking me to stop smearing me around Misplaced Pages. If you continue your unsavoury comments about me, I will ask to have you blocked. So behave, and go write some articles (preferably about topics you are familiar with) ] <small>]</small> 16:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have replied in your talk page. dab, who is brilliant here? A man who learnt a language for 30 years and yet unable to speak the language properly.] 04:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)] 04:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hinduism == | |||
| {{Hindu Links}}--] 07:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Maybe you could some scripts to these articles.--] 19:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Yesudas's Advanced Classic Music Training == | |||
| Hi Bharathveer, | |||
| Please go through the discussion of the Article ]. | |||
| ] 08:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Block warning== | |||
| Your belief that dab is not allowed to remove your comments from his talkpage is mistaken. I've no idea where it comes from, but it's quite wrong. He can remove anything he wants, it is you who are not allowed to edit war to reinsert your comments. You should never restore a comment to a user talkpage which the user in question has removed, unless it's a valid vandalism warning (a far cry from a case like this). Since many of your comments have been harassing and abusive, even threatening, and since dab has requested you to stop posting to his page, I'm formally warning you: don't post to his page again or you'll be blocked. ] | ] 11:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC). | |||
| :I am surprised you are an admin here. For Your Information From "Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages without replying (if a reply would be appropriate or polite) will probably be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings. Redirecting your user talk page to another page (whether meant as a joke or intended to be offensive or to send a "go away" message), except in the case of redirecting from one account to another when both are yours, can also be considered a hostile act. However, reverting such removals or redirects is not proper and may result in a block for edit warring. If someone removes your comments without answering, consider moving on or dispute resolution. This is especially true for vandalism warnings".] 11:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::So am I sometimes, but life is full of surprises. The etiquette guideline you quote refers to erasing ''non-harassing'' personal messages. See, that doesn't happen very often. It's inherently unlikely that people will want to erase civil messages, and it's not what dab was doing. Dab has not contacted me, his page merely happens to be on my watchlist, so I'm not especially well informed about the conflict between you; but then I don't have to be to see that your messages on his page are rude, threatening and abusive, in other words ''harassing''. I would like to endorse the advice you quote from the etiquette page: "If someone removes your comments without answering, consider moving on". ] | ] 12:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC). | |||
| ==] block== | |||
| You have been blocked for 24 hours. I just noticed you reverted four times in less than an hour (!) at ] this morning (UTC), changing the word "archaic" to ancient". | |||
| Original edit: | |||
| First revert: | |||
| Second revert: | |||
| Third revert: | |||
| Fourth revert: | |||
| (Your opponent CrCulver reverted three times: that's edit warring too, and unconstructive, but it's not a 3RR violation.) | |||
| Edit wars are seen as harmful. Please note that the ] rule is an electric fence, ''not'' an entitlement to revert three times a day. I will consider shortening the block if you undertake to edit less confrontationally. ] | ] 14:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC). | |||
| === Unfair? === | |||
| :Misplaced Pages policy clearly states: | |||
| :'''In the cases where multiple parties violate the rule, administrators should treat all sides equally.''' | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| Why was only one party blocked? I think that both of them should have gone away with it with a warning for today, but blocking only one party is very unfair. --] 14:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for listing these diffs for me. I'm not unfair, only human: I missed one. ] | ] 16:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC). | |||
| == To all parties: calm down == | |||
| The disputes that have occured recently are very unproductive. Please focus on writing articles, not on endless and needless discussions. --] 14:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==extremely Biased blocking By bishonen== | |||
| I knew it was coming .But i did not realise it would be on such a flimsy charge.The User ] made this block obviously under the influence of ] .(pls see ]). | |||
| As another user ] correctly pointed out when both me and User :Crculver made the same number of reverts, bishonen who is supposed to act in an unbiased manner blocked only me; which is against the wikipedia guidelines.For anyone who is following this block; It will be interesting to read the User: crcluver's comment at his last revert * - "In a choice between "oldest" and "ancient", "ancient" would be seen as POV as it suggests prestige. Note that after this we would both get smacked for 3RR" . | |||
| This will clearly show the biased manner of Bishonen.One should also look at the way how he tried to justify not blocking the other user.] 16:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)] 16:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Not only was his block justified, but if you continue to harrass Dbachmann upon your return, you will simply be blocked for longer. --] 17:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Inshanee, Do you have any valid arguments that BISHONEN acted in an unbiased manner in this blocking? Or you merely came here to abuse me as requested by User Timothy Usher. | |||
| ::Pls see | |||
| :: | |||
| ::Inshanee is nothing but the latest of the crony invited by dab & Co .I am really surprised wikipedia allows this kind of systematic abuse.The most funny thing is all the three are wiki administrators!!!!!] 19:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Please all calm down again. Lets all forget these petty old disputes and move on. --] 19:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::And consider this your last warning. The above abusive comments are not accpetable, and will not be tolerated. --] 19:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Well, I don't think it is a good idea to say such things - simply to point out the irregularities and point them out and ask for them to be rectified. If there is repeated irregularites then surely the administrator will gain a bad reputation without the need for another to claim impropriety immediately. Also I can see that you did do four reverts, but it seems that Crcluver started the revert war first - he breached the 3RR first so it was not a good idea to respond and break it also. But then it seems he reverted first and last and had five reverts, so I will change his block to 30 hours to make things proportional. ''']''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> ] 01:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:50, 30 June 2012
Welcome!
Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; Archive8 : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; Archive9 :Till Feb 29th 2008; Archive10 :Till April 15th 2008; Archive11 :Till June 20th 2008; Archive12 :Till August 5th 2008; Archive13:Till October 20th 2008; Archive14: Till November 25th 2009;
Welcome back
Hi BV, Welcome back. Hope you'll have a constructive time here. All the best. --Ragib (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. --Ragib (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Heather Ellis
A tag has been placed on Heather Ellis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 09:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Romila Thapar
Tomorrow - I promise! --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 02:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Note
Please see WP:AN#Community ban for Bharatveer. Moreschi (talk) 11:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
You've been banned by the Misplaced Pages community. If you'd like to edit again, you may appeal. Please contact the Arbitration Committee if you'd like your situation reviewed. Jehochman 20:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)