Misplaced Pages

1931 Polish census: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:53, 14 October 2015 editIryna Harpy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,773 edits Reverted to revision 685558475 by Faustian: Rv There has been no consensus for sticking a gallery of page by page reproductions of the census! Absolutely, utterly WP:UNDUE +Sticking the RS section describing issues surrounding the census detracts f...← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:27, 27 October 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 3);Tag: AWB 
(305 intermediate revisions by 85 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Poland's second census during the interwar period}}
{{Infobox {{Infobox
| above = Polish census of 1931 | above = Polish census of 1931
| image = ] | image = ]
| subheader = Mother tongue in Poland, based on 1931 census | subheader = Mother tongue in Poland, based on 1931 census
| caption = {{commons category-inline}}
| caption = {{commonscat-inline|Polish census of 1931|Polish census of 1931 - ''Statistics of Poland''}}
}} }}


The '''Polish census of 1931''' or '''Second General Census in Poland''' ({{lang-pl|Drugi Powszechny Spis Ludności}}) was the second census taken in ], performed on December 9, 1931 by the ].<ref name="GUS">{{cite book | author =] (corporate author) | title =Drugi powszechny spis ludności z dnia 9 XII 1931r. Formularze i instrukcje spisowe | year =1932 | page =128 | publisher =Główny Urząd Statystyczny | location =Warsaw |language=pl}}</ref> It established that Poland's population amounted to 32 million people (over 5 million more than in the ]). The '''Polish census of 1931''' or '''Second General Census in Poland''' ({{langx|pl|Drugi Powszechny Spis Ludności}}) was the second census taken in ] during the ], performed on December 9, 1931 by the ].<ref name="GUS">{{cite book|author=] |title=Drugi powszechny spis ludności z dnia 9 XII 1931r. Formularze i instrukcje spisowe|year=1932|page=128 |publisher=Główny Urząd Statystyczny|location=Warsaw|language=pl}}</ref> It established that Poland's population amounted to almost 32 million people (over 6 million more than in the ]).


The census was organised following the rules established by an act of the ] of October 14, 1931. In contrast to earlier census of 1921, the 1931 census did not count ] and detailed information on types of farms, leaving only the question of the overall area of land owned by the citizen.<ref name="Rozporzadzenie">{{cite book | author =] | title =Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 2 września 1931 r. w sprawie przeprowadzenia drugiego powszechnego spisu ludności | year =1931 | location =Warsaw | id=] 1931 nr 80 poz. 629 | url =http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/Download;jsessionid=80EAABB55782E83D18D1B6328F5CA23C?id=WDU19310800629&type=2 | format =PDF |language=pl}}</ref> The part related to education was expanded to include questions of ability to read and write. The census was organised following the rules established by an act of the ] of October 14, 1931. In contrast to the earlier census of 1921, the 1931 census did not count ] and detailed information on types of farms, leaving only the question of the overall area of land owned by the citizen.<ref name="Rozporzadzenie">{{cite book|author=]|title=Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 2 września 1931 r. w sprawie przeprowadzenia drugiego powszechnego spisu ludności|year=1931|location=Warsaw|id=] 1931 nr 80 poz. 629|url=http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/Download;jsessionid=80EAABB55782E83D18D1B6328F5CA23C?id=WDU19310800629&type=2|format=PDF|language=pl}}</ref> The part related to education was expanded to include questions of ability to read and write.


The results of the census were being published in 39 volumes between 1936 and 1939 in a publishing series "Statistics of Poland". A list of all settlements in Poland was also prepared, but only a part related to ] was published. The results of the census were being published in 39 volumes between 1936 and 1939 in a publishing series titled "Statistics of Poland". A list of all settlements in Poland was also prepared, but only a part related to ] was published.


==Population by mother tongue and faith==
== Results ==
The population was categorized by mother tongue i.e. the ] in the following categories: Polish, Ukrainian, Ruthenian (i.e. ]), Belarusian, Russian, Lithuanian, German, Yiddish, Hebrew, Local, Other, and Not Declared. The category "Local" ({{lang-pl|tutejszy}}) versus "Other" ({{lang-pl|inny}}) was hotly debated after the fact, because a number of significant languages were not on the list, e.g., ], ], and/or what might constitute ] e.g. ], ] and others.<ref name="Marcus"/> The population was categorized by mother tongue i.e. the ] in the following categories: Polish, Ukrainian, Ruthenian (i.e. ]), Belarusian, Russian, Lithuanian, German, Yiddish, Hebrew, Local, Other, and Not Declared. The category "Local" ({{langx|pl|tutejszy}}) versus "Other" ({{langx|pl|inny}}) was hotly debated after the fact, because a number of significant languages were not on the list, e.g., ], ], and/or what might constitute ] e.g. ], ] and others.<ref name="Marcus"/>
] ]
{| {|
Line 19: Line 20:
! Population by faith ! Population by faith
|- |-
| |
# Total: {{in5|13}} 31,915,779 # Total: {{in5|13}} 31,915,779
# Polish: {{in5|11}} 21,993,444 # Polish: {{in5|11}} 21,993,444
# Ukrainian: {{in5|8}} 3,221,975 # Ukrainian: {{in5|8}} 3,221,975
# Ruthenian: {{in5|7}} 1,219,647 # Ruthenian: {{in5|7}} 1,219,647
# Belarussian: {{in5|7}} 989,852 # Belarusian: {{in5|7}} 989,852
# Russian: {{in5|13}} 138,713 # Russian: {{in5|13}} 138,713
# Czech: {{in5|18}} 38,097 # Czech: {{in5|18}} 38,097
Line 49: Line 50:
# Non-believers: {{in5|18}} 6,058 # Non-believers: {{in5|18}} 6,058
# Not Declared: {{in5|17}} 39,663 # Not Declared: {{in5|17}} 39,663
:<ref name="Polish Census 1931">{{cite web|url=http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140317212240/http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archivedate=2014-03-17|title=Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, drugi powszechny spis ludności z dn. 9.XII 1931 r. - Mieszkania i gospodarstwa domowe ludność|trans-title=Central Statistical Office the Polish Republic, the second census dated 9.XII 1931 - Abodes and household populace |publisher=Central Stastical office of the Polish Republic |year=1938 |format=PDF, direct download, table: page 30; in Polish }}</ref> :<ref name="Polish Census 1931">{{cite web|url=http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140317212240/http://statlibr.stat.gov.pl/exlibris/aleph/a18_1/apache_media/VUNVGMLANSCQQFGYHCN3VDLK12A9U5.pdf|archive-date=2014-03-17|title=Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, drugi powszechny spis ludności z dn. 9.XII 1931 r. - Mieszkania i gospodarstwa domowe ludność|trans-title=Central Statistical Office the Polish Republic, the second census dated 9.XII 1931 - Abodes and household populace|language=pl|publisher=Central Statistical office of the Polish Republic|year=1938|format=PDF, direct download, table: page 30}}</ref>
|} |}
The number of Polish native speakers relative to the total number of Roman Catholics may be overestimated, and possibly closer 17-18 millions.{{citation needed|date=February 2020}}
The population was also categorized by religion. Most Jews spoke ], and some spoke Hebrew. However included with the Jews are 372,000 Polish speakers who are sometimes classified with the Polish group. Included with the Poles are 984,000 ] & ] adherents who are sometimes classified with the Ukrainian and Belarusian groups by those seeking to assign ethnicity based upon religion.<ref>U.S. Bureau of the Census The Population of Poland Ed. W. Parker Mauldin; Washington, 1954.&nbsp;{{Page needed|date=October 2014}}</ref> Statistical differences existed between Ruthenians and Ukrainians. Ruthenians nationwide were 96.5% Catholic but only 3.2% Orthodox, compared to Ukrainians who were almost equally divided at 52.4% Catholic and 46.6% Orthodox.<ref name="Polish Census 1931"/><ref>(Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)</ref>


The population was also categorized by religion. Most Jews spoke ], and many spoke Polish and Russian. These were categorized as two groups.<ref name="US Census Bureau 1954. pp.74-75">US Census Bureau, The Population of Poland Ed. W. Parker Mauldin, Washington-1954. pp.74-75</ref> Statistical differences existed between Ruthenians and Ukrainians. Ruthenians nationwide were 96.5% Greek Catholic but only 3.2% Orthodox, compared to Ukrainians who were almost equally divided at 52.4% Greek Catholic and 46.6% Orthodox.<ref name="Polish Census 1931"/><ref name="Pol Census 1931"/> Most Ruthenians lived in provinces where the majority of the Ukrainian population was Greek Catholic, too.
== Nationality question and criticism ==
The veracity of the census' results was questioned already in the 1930s, particularly in the part related to ]. Contrary to expectations on the side of national minorities themselves, the census used the concept of ] and ] to classify the respondents, rather than ]. ] had included a nationality question which was replaced in the 1931 census by the "mother tongue" question; this change was protested by Ukrainians and Jews among others, many of whom were ].<ref name="Stopnicka">{{cite book|author=Celia Stopnicka Heller|title=On the Edge of Destruction: Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars|year=1993|publisher=] Press|page=68|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GmVt-O3AR34C&pg=PA68&dq=polish+census+1931&lr=&as_brr=3&client=firefox-a | isbn=978-0-8143-2494-3}}</ref> Moreover, many Jews considered Polish to be their mother tongue.<ref name="Marcus">{{cite book|author=Joseph Marcus|title=Social and Political History of the Jews in Poland, 1919-1939|year=1983|page=17|publisher=]|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=82ncGA4GuN4C&pg=PA17&dq=polish+census+1931&lr=&as_brr=3&client=firefox-a#PPA17,M1 | isbn=978-90-279-3239-6}}</ref>


===By cities===
This situation created a difficulty in establishing the true number of non-Polish citizens of Poland. Some authors used the language
<gallery class="center" widths="100px" heights="160px">
criterion to attempt to establish the actual number of minorities, which was difficult considering that over 707,000 people in ] declared that they spoke "]" rather than any other language.<ref name="Fowkes">{{cite book|author=Ben Fowkes|title=Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-communist World|year=2002|publisher= ] |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=9S4pCKm9bUEC&pg=PA73&dq=polish+census+1931&lr=&as_brr=3&client=firefox-a | isbn=978-0-333-79256-8}}</ref> Other authors used approximation based on both language and declared religion.<ref name="Tomaszewski">{{cite book | author =] | title =Rzeczpospolita wielu narodów | year =1985 | page =35 | publisher =Czytelnik | location =Warsaw|language=pl}}, as cited in Piotrowski, op.cit., page 294</ref> After ] in ] countries the interpretation of the census was used for political purposes, to underline the officially-supported thesis that pre-war Poland incorporated areas where the non-Polish population made up the majority of inhabitants. For this purpose some authors combined all non-Polish speakers in South-Eastern Poland (namely ], ], ], ], ], ]s and ]s) into one category of "Ruthenians".<ref name="Zielinski">{{cite book | author =Henryk Zieliński | title =Historia Polski 1914-1939 | year =1983 | pages = | publisher =] | location =Wrocław | isbn= |language=pl}}</ref> In fact, the census had counted speakers of Belarusian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Ruthenian languages as separate categories<ref name="Pol Census 1931">(Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)</ref>
File:1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Krakow , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Kraków, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
File:1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Lodz, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.14.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Łódź, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.14
File:1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Lwow , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Lwow, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
File:1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Poznan , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Poznań , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
File:1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Warsaw , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.18.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Warsaw, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.18
File:1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Wilno , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Wilno, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
</gallery>


===By voivodships===
Some authors contend that the change in questions asked by the census officials was due to the Polish government's wish to minimise the presence of minorities<ref name="Marcus"/><ref name="Piotrowski">{{cite book|author=]|title=Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947|year=1998|publisher=]|chapter=Belorussian collaboration|chapterurl=http://books.google.com/books?id=hC0-dk7vpM8C&pg=PA294&dq=polish+census+1931+methodology&as_brr=3&client=firefox-a|page=294}}</ref><ref name="Ther">{{cite book|author=Philipp Ther|author2=Ana Siljak|title=Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948|year=2001|publisher=]|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=oGmTs2SceAgC&pg=PA136&dq=polish+census+1931&lr=&as_brr=3&client=firefox-a#PPA136,M1 | isbn=978-0-7425-1094-4}}</ref> and represented an attempt to maximize the effects of a decade of educational policies stressing the Polish language.<ref name="Prizel">{{cite book|page=63|title=National identity and foreign policy: nationalism and leadership in Poland|author=Ilya Prizel|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=fE2quB852jcC&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=ilya+prizel+polish+census&source=bl&ots=6duakXjQtB&sig=2D7P3Os-tU6c8zxIqoQ1264DPzw&hl=en&ei=dqB1S52YHZD6nAf05sWiCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false|publisher=]|year=1998 | isbn=978-0-521-57697-0}}</ref> ] called the 1931 census
<gallery class="center" widths="100px" heights="160px">
official but "unreliable", noting that it had underestimated the number of non-Poles, and that in particular, Poles were not a majority in the
File:1931 Census of Poland, Bialostock Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Bialostock Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23
] and ].<ref name="Piotrowski2">Piotrowski, op.cit.,
File:1931 Census of Poland, Krakow Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Kraków Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
: '' were distributed as follows: Polesie, 654,000; Nowogrodek, 616,000; Wilno, 409,000; Bialystok,269,100''</ref>
File:1931 Census of Poland, Kielce Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.28.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Kielce Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.28
File:1931 Census of Poland, Lublin Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Lublin Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
File:1931 Census of Poland, Lodz Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Łódź Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23
File:1931 Census of Poland, Lwow Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Lwow Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32
File:1931 Census of Poland, Nowogrodek Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.19.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Nowogrodek Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.19
File:1931 Census of Poland, Slaskie Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Slaskie Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20
File:1931 Census of Poland, Polesie Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Polesie Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20
File:1931 Census of Poland, Pomorski Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Pomorski Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
File:1931 Census of Poland, Poznan Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Poznań Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32
File:1931 Census of Poland, Stanislaw Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Stanislaw Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22
File:1931 Census of Poland, Tarnopol Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Tarnopol Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
File:1931 Census of Poland, Warsaw Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.30.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Warsaw Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.30
File:1931 Census of Poland, Wilno Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.10.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Wilno Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.10
File:1931 Census of Poland, Wolyn Voivod, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22.jpg|1931 Census of Poland, Wolyn Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22
</gallery>


===Mother tongue controversy===
After ] the pre-war chairman of the Polish census statistical office, ], was reported to have admitted that the census returns, particularly those from the south-east, had been altered at executive level.<ref name="Marcus"/> Another account has it that he admitted "that officials had been directed to undercount minorities, especially those in the eastern provinces".<ref name="Blanke">{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=80r6Mbnxf8IC&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=Edward+Szturm+de+Sztrem+census&source=bl&ots=O_JJJ2M5oC&sig=98RkAiV0uwPcjRJQWe-pLS45zfE&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result|title=Orphans of Versailles: The Germans in Western Poland, 1918-1939|author=Richard Blanke|publisher=]|year=1993 | isbn=978-0-8131-1803-1}}</ref>
{{POV section|date=October 2015}}
The census used the concept of ] and ] to classify the respondents, rather than ]. ] had included a nationality question which was replaced in the 1931 census by the "mother tongue" question; this change was protested by Ukrainians and Jews{{Dubious |1921 census Jews with Polish national identity vs. 1931 census Jews with Polish mother tongue |reason=in the census of 1921 a higher percent of Jews - over 25% - declared Polish nationality, than that which declared Polish mother tongue - almost 12% - in 1931. Considering that even many Jews whose mother tongue was Non-Polish considered themselves to be Poles by nationality in 1921, I see no reason why would they protest the replacement of "nationality" question by "mother tongue" question - unless the reason was that Yiddish-speaking Jews who considered their nationality to be Polish could not declare Polish mother tongue? See also the talk page and references to Ezra Mendelsohn's book. |date=March 2016}} among others, many of whom were ].<ref name="Stopnicka">{{cite book|author=Celia Stopnicka Heller|author-link=Celia Stopnicka Heller|title=On the Edge of Destruction: Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GmVt-O3AR34C&pg=PA68|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1993|publisher=Wayne State University Press|isbn=0-8143-2494-0|page=68}}</ref> Moreover, many Jews by religion - almost 12% - considered Polish to be their mother tongue in 1931.<ref name="Marcus">{{cite book|author=Joseph Marcus|title=Social and Political History of the Jews in Poland, 1919-1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=82ncGA4GuN4C&pg=PA17|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1983|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|isbn=978-90-279-3239-6|page=17}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA30 |first1=Ezra|last1=Mendelsohn|title=The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1987| pages=30–31|isbn=0253204186}}</ref> However, a higher percent of Jews by religion - over 25% - considered themselves to be ] (or in terms of ]) ], according to the previous census of 1921.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA29 |first1=Ezra|last1=Mendelsohn|title=The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars|publisher=Indiana University Press|year=1987| pages=29–30|isbn=0253204186}}</ref> Thus the number of Jews by mother tongue increased as a percentage of the population in the 1931 survey, relative to the number of Jews as a nationality in the 1921 Census.

This situation created a difficulty in establishing the true number of ethnic non-Polish citizens of Poland. Some authors used the language criterion to attempt to establish the actual number of minorities, which was difficult considering that over 707,000 people in ] declared that they spoke "]" rather than any other language.<ref name="Fowkes">{{cite book|author=Ben Fowkes|title=Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9S4pCKm9bUEC&pg=PA73|access-date=17 October 2015|year=2002|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-0-333-79256-8|page=73}}</ref> Other authors used approximation based on both language and declared religion.<ref name="Tomaszewski">{{cite book|author=]|title =Rzeczpospolita wielu narodów|year=1985|page=35|publisher=Czytelnik|location=Warsaw|language=pl}}, as cited in Piotrowski, op.cit., page 294</ref> After ] in ] countries the interpretation of the census was used for political purposes, to underline the officially-supported thesis that pre-war Poland incorporated areas where the non-Polish population made up the majority of inhabitants. For this purpose some authors combined all non-Polish speakers in South-Eastern Poland (namely ], ], ], ], ], ]s and ]s) into one category of "]").<ref name="Zielinski">{{cite book|author=Henryk Zieliński|title=Historia Polski 1914-1939|year=1983|publisher=]|location=Wrocław|language=pl}}</ref> In fact, the census had counted speakers of Belarusian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Ruthenian languages as separate categories<ref name="Pol Census 1931">(Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)</ref>

Some authors contend that the change in questions asked by the census officials was due to the Polish government's wish to minimise the presence of minorities<ref name="Marcus"/><ref name="Piotrowski">{{cite book|author=Tadeusz Piotrowski|author-link=Tadeusz Piotrowski (sociologist)|title=Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hC0-dk7vpM8C&pg=PA294|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1998|publisher=McFarland|isbn=978-0-7864-0371-4|page=294|chapter=Belorussian collaboration}}</ref><ref name="Ther">{{cite book|author1=Philipp Ther|author2=Ana Siljak|author-link2=Ana Siljak|title=Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oGmTs2SceAgC&pg=PA136|access-date=17 October 2015|year=2001|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-0-7425-1094-4|page=136}}</ref> and represented an attempt to maximize the effects of a decade of educational policies stressing the Polish language.<ref name="Prizel">{{cite book|author=Ilya Prizel|title=National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fE2quB852jcC&pg=PA63|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1998|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-57697-0|page=63}}</ref> ] called the 1931 census official but "unreliable" for determining ethnicity, saying that by using language as an indicator of ethnicity it had underestimated the number of ethnic non-Poles, and that in particular, ethnic Poles were not a majority in the
] and ].<ref name="Piotrowski2">Piotrowski, op.cit., : '' were distributed as follows: Polesie, 654,000; Nowogrodek, 616,000; Wilno, 409,000; Bialystok,269,100''</ref> A 1954 study of the Polish population by the ] concluded that "in presenting the results, the Central Statistical office emphasized the central role played by the Polish ethnic group by increasing the number of minority groups, and thus reducing the size of a given group, shown in the results. Ukrainian and Ruthenian were tabulated as separate languages, although Ukrainian was simply the newer name for Ruthenian, used by the more politically conscious and nationalistic elements. In the Province of Polesie, the census authorities returned most of the Belarusians there as speaking 'local languages'."<ref name="US Census Bureau 1954. pp.74-75"/>

After ] the pre-war chairman of the Polish census statistical office ] was quoted by communist sources to have admitted that the returned census forms had been interfered with by the executive. This it was claimed, affected particularly those forms from the south-eastern provinces. The extent of the tampering is not known.<ref>Joseph Marcus (1983), p. 17;</ref> Another English language account stated that he admitted "that officials had been directed to undercount minorities, especially those in the eastern provinces".<ref name="Blanke">{{cite book|author=Richard Blanke|title=Orphans of Versailles: The Germans in Western Poland, 1918-1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=80r6Mbnxf8IC&pg=PA95|access-date=17 October 2015|year=1993|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=0-8131-3041-7|page=95}}</ref>


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
*{{Commons category-inline}}
* Internet Archive (PDF file direct download, 88 pages). * Internet Archive (PDF file direct download, 88 pages).
*The Partial results can be found when searching for the following keyword: *The Partial results can be found when searching for the following keyword:


] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 11:27, 27 October 2024

Poland's second census during the interwar period
Polish census of 1931
Mother tongue in Poland, based on 1931 census
GUS languages 1931 Media related to Polish census of 1931 at Wikimedia Commons

The Polish census of 1931 or Second General Census in Poland (Polish: Drugi Powszechny Spis Ludności) was the second census taken in sovereign Poland during the interwar period, performed on December 9, 1931 by the Main Bureau of Statistics. It established that Poland's population amounted to almost 32 million people (over 6 million more than in the previous census of 1921).

The census was organised following the rules established by an act of the Polish Parliament of October 14, 1931. In contrast to the earlier census of 1921, the 1931 census did not count national minorities and detailed information on types of farms, leaving only the question of the overall area of land owned by the citizen. The part related to education was expanded to include questions of ability to read and write.

The results of the census were being published in 39 volumes between 1936 and 1939 in a publishing series titled "Statistics of Poland". A list of all settlements in Poland was also prepared, but only a part related to Wilno Voivodeship was published.

Population by mother tongue and faith

The population was categorized by mother tongue i.e. the primary language in the following categories: Polish, Ukrainian, Ruthenian (i.e. Rusyn), Belarusian, Russian, Lithuanian, German, Yiddish, Hebrew, Local, Other, and Not Declared. The category "Local" (Polish: tutejszy) versus "Other" (Polish: inny) was hotly debated after the fact, because a number of significant languages were not on the list, e.g., Romani, Armenian, and/or what might constitute transitional language e.g. Polesian, Kashubian and others.

1931 Census of Poland Table 10 "Ludnosc- Population", pg.15
Population by first language Population by faith
  1. Total:               31,915,779
  2. Polish:             21,993,444
  3. Ukrainian:          3,221,975
  4. Ruthenian:         1,219,647
  5. Belarusian:         989,852
  6. Russian:               138,713
  7. Czech:                    38,097
  8. Lithuanian:             83,116
  9. German:               740,992
  10. Yiddish:             2,489,034
  11. Hebrew:                243,539
  12. Local:                   707,088
  13. Other:                     11,119
  14. Not Declared:         39,163
  1. Total:                         31,915,779
  2. Roman Catholic:       20,670,051
  3. Greco Catholic:           3,336,164
  4. Orthodox:                    3,762,484
  5. Protestant Lutheran:      424,216
  6. Protestant Reformed:       33,295
  7. Protestant Unite:            269,531
  8. Protestant (gen.):           108,216
  9. Other Christian:              145,418
  10. Judaism:                      3,113,933
  11. Other non-Christian:          6,750
  12. Non-believers:                    6,058
  13. Not Declared:                   39,663

The number of Polish native speakers relative to the total number of Roman Catholics may be overestimated, and possibly closer 17-18 millions.

The population was also categorized by religion. Most Jews spoke Yiddish, and many spoke Polish and Russian. These were categorized as two groups. Statistical differences existed between Ruthenians and Ukrainians. Ruthenians nationwide were 96.5% Greek Catholic but only 3.2% Orthodox, compared to Ukrainians who were almost equally divided at 52.4% Greek Catholic and 46.6% Orthodox. Most Ruthenians lived in provinces where the majority of the Ukrainian population was Greek Catholic, too.

By cities

  • 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Kraków, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Kraków, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Łódź, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.14 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Łódź, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.14
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Lwow, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Lwow, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Poznań , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Poznań , table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Warsaw, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.18 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Warsaw, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.18
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Wilno, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11 1931 Census of Poland, Miasto Wilno, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.11

By voivodships

  • 1931 Census of Poland, Bialostock Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23 1931 Census of Poland, Bialostock Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Kraków Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26 1931 Census of Poland, Kraków Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Kielce Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.28 1931 Census of Poland, Kielce Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.28
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Lublin Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26 1931 Census of Poland, Lublin Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Łódź Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23 1931 Census of Poland, Łódź Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.23
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Lwow Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32 1931 Census of Poland, Lwow Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Nowogrodek Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.19 1931 Census of Poland, Nowogrodek Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.19
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Slaskie Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20 1931 Census of Poland, Slaskie Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Polesie Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20 1931 Census of Poland, Polesie Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.20
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Pomorski Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26 1931 Census of Poland, Pomorski Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Poznań Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32 1931 Census of Poland, Poznań Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.32
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Stanislaw Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22 1931 Census of Poland, Stanislaw Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Tarnopol Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26 1931 Census of Poland, Tarnopol Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.26
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Warsaw Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.30 1931 Census of Poland, Warsaw Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.30
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Wilno Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.10 1931 Census of Poland, Wilno Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.10
  • 1931 Census of Poland, Wolyn Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22 1931 Census of Poland, Wolyn Voivodship, table 10 Ludnosc-Population-pg.22

Mother tongue controversy

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (October 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The census used the concept of mother tongue and religion to classify the respondents, rather than nationality. The 1921 census had included a nationality question which was replaced in the 1931 census by the "mother tongue" question; this change was protested by Ukrainians and Jews among others, many of whom were bilingual or trilingual. Moreover, many Jews by religion - almost 12% - considered Polish to be their mother tongue in 1931. However, a higher percent of Jews by religion - over 25% - considered themselves to be ethnically (or in terms of national identity) Poles, according to the previous census of 1921. Thus the number of Jews by mother tongue increased as a percentage of the population in the 1931 survey, relative to the number of Jews as a nationality in the 1921 Census.

This situation created a difficulty in establishing the true number of ethnic non-Polish citizens of Poland. Some authors used the language criterion to attempt to establish the actual number of minorities, which was difficult considering that over 707,000 people in Polesia declared that they spoke "local" rather than any other language. Other authors used approximation based on both language and declared religion. After World War II in Soviet bloc countries the interpretation of the census was used for political purposes, to underline the officially-supported thesis that pre-war Poland incorporated areas where the non-Polish population made up the majority of inhabitants. For this purpose some authors combined all non-Polish speakers in South-Eastern Poland (namely Ukrainians, Belarusians, Rusyns, Hutsuls, Lemkos, Boykos and Poleszuks) into one category of "Ruthenians"). In fact, the census had counted speakers of Belarusian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Ruthenian languages as separate categories

Some authors contend that the change in questions asked by the census officials was due to the Polish government's wish to minimise the presence of minorities and represented an attempt to maximize the effects of a decade of educational policies stressing the Polish language. Tadeusz Piotrowski called the 1931 census official but "unreliable" for determining ethnicity, saying that by using language as an indicator of ethnicity it had underestimated the number of ethnic non-Poles, and that in particular, ethnic Poles were not a majority in the Nowogródek Voivodeship and Polesie Voivodeship. A 1954 study of the Polish population by the United States Census Bureau concluded that "in presenting the results, the Central Statistical office emphasized the central role played by the Polish ethnic group by increasing the number of minority groups, and thus reducing the size of a given group, shown in the results. Ukrainian and Ruthenian were tabulated as separate languages, although Ukrainian was simply the newer name for Ruthenian, used by the more politically conscious and nationalistic elements. In the Province of Polesie, the census authorities returned most of the Belarusians there as speaking 'local languages'."

After World War II the pre-war chairman of the Polish census statistical office Edward Szturm de Sztrem was quoted by communist sources to have admitted that the returned census forms had been interfered with by the executive. This it was claimed, affected particularly those forms from the south-eastern provinces. The extent of the tampering is not known. Another English language account stated that he admitted "that officials had been directed to undercount minorities, especially those in the eastern provinces".

References

  1. Główny Urząd Statystyczny (1932). Drugi powszechny spis ludności z dnia 9 XII 1931r. Formularze i instrukcje spisowe (in Polish). Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. p. 128.
  2. Council of Ministers of the Republic of Poland (1931). Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 2 września 1931 r. w sprawie przeprowadzenia drugiego powszechnego spisu ludności (PDF) (in Polish). Warsaw. Dz.U. 1931 nr 80 poz. 629.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ Joseph Marcus (1983). Social and Political History of the Jews in Poland, 1919-1939. Walter de Gruyter. p. 17. ISBN 978-90-279-3239-6. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  4. ^ "Główny Urząd Statystyczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, drugi powszechny spis ludności z dn. 9.XII 1931 r. - Mieszkania i gospodarstwa domowe ludność" [Central Statistical Office the Polish Republic, the second census dated 9.XII 1931 - Abodes and household populace] (PDF) (in Polish). Central Statistical office of the Polish Republic. 1938. Archived from the original (PDF, direct download, table: page 30) on 2014-03-17.
  5. ^ US Census Bureau, The Population of Poland Ed. W. Parker Mauldin, Washington-1954. pp.74-75
  6. ^ (Polish) Główny Urząd Statystyczny (corporate author) (1932) "Ludnosc, Ludnosc wedlug wyznania i plci oraz jezyka ojczystego" (table 10, pg. 15)
  7. Celia Stopnicka Heller (1993). On the Edge of Destruction: Jews of Poland Between the Two World Wars. Wayne State University Press. p. 68. ISBN 0-8143-2494-0. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  8. Mendelsohn, Ezra (1987). The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars. Indiana University Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 0253204186.
  9. Mendelsohn, Ezra (1987). The Jews of East Central Europe Between the World Wars. Indiana University Press. pp. 29–30. ISBN 0253204186.
  10. Ben Fowkes (2002). Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-333-79256-8. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  11. Jerzy Tomaszewski (1985). Rzeczpospolita wielu narodów (in Polish). Warsaw: Czytelnik. p. 35., as cited in Piotrowski, op.cit., page 294
  12. Henryk Zieliński (1983). Historia Polski 1914-1939 (in Polish). Wrocław: Ossolineum.
  13. Tadeusz Piotrowski (1998). "Belorussian collaboration". Poland's Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947. McFarland. p. 294. ISBN 978-0-7864-0371-4. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  14. Philipp Ther; Ana Siljak (2001). Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 136. ISBN 978-0-7425-1094-4. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  15. Ilya Prizel (1998). National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-521-57697-0. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  16. Piotrowski, op.cit., page 143: were distributed as follows: Polesie, 654,000; Nowogrodek, 616,000; Wilno, 409,000; Bialystok,269,100
  17. Joseph Marcus (1983), p. 17;
  18. Richard Blanke (1993). Orphans of Versailles: The Germans in Western Poland, 1918-1939. University Press of Kentucky. p. 95. ISBN 0-8131-3041-7. Retrieved 17 October 2015.

External links

Categories: