Revision as of 02:44, 23 November 2015 editBohemian Baltimore (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users116,679 edits removed Category:Sex- or gender-related stereotypes; added Category:Stereotypes of women using HotCat← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:05, 16 November 2024 edit undoBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers494,034 edits Reverted 1 edit by 2806:10B7:3:C212:1901:63C5:E571:4D85 (talk): Rv poor English, misunderstanding the topicTags: Twinkle Undo | ||
(913 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Pejorative term for feminists}} | |||
{{primary sources|date=March 2013}} | |||
{{italic title}} | |||
'''Feminazi''' is a term used ]ly in popular culture to describe either feminists who are perceived as extreme or radical,<ref name="m-w1"/><ref> by Peter Skutta</ref> women who are perceived to seek superiority over men,<ref name="rulesoffeminism">{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leah-kashar/rules-of-feminism_b_4191116.html|title=The Rules of Feminism |publisher=The Huffington Post}}</ref> rather than equality, or in some cases, to describe all feminists.<ref name="soft-repression">{{cite book|last1=Ferree|first1=Myra Max|authorlink1= |editor1-first=Daniel J.|editor1-last=Myers|editor1-link= |editor2-first=Daniel M.|editor2-last=Cress|editor2-link=|title=Authority in Contention|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=d6FtI8kp6PAC&pg=PA90|accessdate=2012-03-03|edition= |series=Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change|volume=25|date=2005-02-17|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-7623-1037-1|issn=0163-786X|page=90|chapter=Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Ailencing in Gender-based Movements|quote=More recently, consider the term 'feminazi' that Rush Limbaugh coined to ridicule feminists...}}</ref><ref> by April Dye for the Association for Women in Psychology Abstract: "Popular culture often portrays feminists as 'feminazis{{'"}}.</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=TZs-PBVD_p8C&pg=PA177 |page=177 |title=The Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and how All Men Can Help |last=Katz |first=Jackson |publisher=Sourcebooks |year=2006 |isbn=9781402253768 |quote=So when Limbaugh stigmatizes feminists by calling them names like 'feminazi,' he is attacking those women who have been most successful...}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | date = March 1, 2011 | chapter = Bitches, Butt Boys, and Feminazis: Limbaugh's Sexism and Homophobia | title = The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh’s Assault on Reason | first = John K. | last = Wilson | publisher = Macmillan | isbn = 9780312612146 | ol = 24385112M | page = 56 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZCy4-K4nar8C&pg=PA56&dq=feminazi | quote = When asked in 1995 about the term "feminazi," he declared: "It's the way I look at the feminist movement." Limbaugh referred to the National Center for Women and Policing and the Feminist Majority Foundation as "feminazis." So it's not just twenty-five individuals, but every single feminist organization, its leaders, and millions upon millions of Americans with the same views whom Limbaugh compares to Nazis.}}</ref> | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2023}} | |||
{{distinguish|Nazi feminism}} | |||
'''''Feminazi''''' (also spelled '''''femi-nazi''''' and '''''Femi-Nazi'''''{{r|Horan 2019}}) is a ] term for ]s that was popularized by ] American radio talk show host ]. | |||
==Origins and usage== | |||
The term was popularized by politically conservative radio ] host ] and in use since the early 1990s. It is a ] of the nouns '']'' and '']''. The online version of the ] defines the term as used in a "usually disparaging" manner, to describe "an extreme or militant feminist".<ref name="m-w1"></ref> | |||
''Feminazi'' is a ] of the nouns '']'' and '']''.{{r|Horan 2019|Merriam-Webster}} According to ''The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang'', it refers (pejoratively) to "a committed feminist or a strong-willed woman".{{r|Barrett 2006}} The earliest attested use, according to the ''],'' is a 1989 article in the '']'' about an ] that used the slogan "Feminazis Go Home".{{r|Horan 2019}} The term was later popularized by American conservative radio talk show host ] in the early 1990s.{{r|Horan 2019|Lacy 2010|Moi 2006|Kimmel 2013}} Limbaugh credited the coining of the term to university professor ].{{r|Moi 2006|Limbaugh 1992}} | |||
Limbaugh, who was vocally critical of the ],{{r|Jamieson 2008}} stated that the term ''feminazi'' refers to "]" whose goal is "to see that there are as many abortions as possible",{{r|Barrett 2006|Moi 2006}} a small group of "militants"{{r|Jamieson 2008}} whom he characterized as having a "quest for power" and a "belief that men aren't necessary".{{r|Moi 2006}} Limbaugh distinguished these women from "well-intentioned but misguided people who call themselves 'feminists{{' "}}.{{r|Jamieson 2008}} However, the term came to be widely used for feminism as a whole.{{r|Levit 1998}} According to '']'', Limbaugh used the term "to marginalize any feminist as a hardline, uncompromising manhater".{{r|Dalzell 2015}} ''The New York Times'' has described it as "one of favorite epithets for supporters of women's rights".{{r|Seelye 1994}} | |||
== Etymology and usage == | |||
In his 1992 book ''The Way Things Ought to Be'', Limbaugh credited his friend ], professor of economics at the University of California at Davis, with coining the term.<ref name="TheWayp193">Rush H. Limbaugh, ''The Way Things Ought to Be'', Pocket Books, 1992 | |||
:''"I prefer to call the most obnoxious feminists what they really are: feminazis. ], a good friend who is an esteemed and highly regarded professor of economics at the ], coined the term to describe any female who is intolerant of any point of view that challenges militant feminism."''</ref> In the book, Limbaugh also stated that the word refers to unspecified women whose goal is to allow as many abortions as possible, saying at one point that there were fewer than 25 "true feminazis" in the U.S.<ref name="TheWayp296">{{cite book | first = Rush H., III | last = Limbaugh | chapter = The Limbaugh Lexicon | title = The Way Things Ought to Be | publisher = Pocket Books | year = 1992 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=XDVMk6q_pm4C&q=%22a+Feminazi+is+a+feminist+to+whom%22&pgis=1 | page = 296 | quote = Feminazi: Widely misunderstood by most to simply mean "feminist." Not so, boobala. A Feminazi is a feminist to whom the most important thing in life is ensuring that as many abortions as possible occur. There are fewer than twenty-five known Feminazis in the United States.}}</ref><ref>Britt Gillette, ''The Dittohead's Guide to Adult Beverages'', Regnery Publishing, 2005, </ref><ref name="rls-accurate" /> Limbaugh has used the term to refer to members of the ], the ], the ], and other organizations at the ], a large ] demonstration.<ref name=limbaugh-accurate-broadcast/><ref>{{cite book | date = March 1, 2011 | chapter = Bitches, Butt Boys, and Feminazis: Limbaugh's Sexism and Homophobia | title = The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh’s Assault on Reason | first = John K. | last = Wilson | publisher = Macmillan | isbn = 9780312612146 | ol = 24385112M | page = 56 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZCy4-K4nar8C&pg=PA56&dq=feminazi | quote = When asked in 1995 about the term "feminazi," he declared: "It's the way I look at the feminist movement." Limbaugh referred to the National Center for Women and Policing and the Feminist Majority Foundation as "feminazis." So it's not just twenty-five individuals, but every single feminist organization, its leaders, and millions upon millions of Americans with the same views whom Limbaugh compares to Nazis.}}</ref> | |||
The term ''feminazi'' is used to characterize feminist perspectives as extreme in order to discredit feminist arguments{{r|Rodriguez-Darias 2018}} and to stigmatize women's views or behavior as "radical", "extreme", and "tyrannical".{{r|Horan 2019}} It has been used in mainstream American discourse to erroneously portray women as hyper-vigilant to perceived ].{{r|Brake 2007}} Literary critic ] writes that the term reflects commonplace ideas that feminists "hate men", are "dogmatic, inflexible, and intolerant", and constitute "an extremist, power-hungry minority".{{r|Moi 2006}} In his book '']'', the sociologist Michael Kimmel says the term is used to attack feminist campaigns for ] and safety from ] and ] by associating them with ].{{r|Kimmel 2013}} | |||
In 2004, Limbaugh named feminist activists ], ], ], and ] as "famous feminazis."<ref name=limbaugh-accurate-broadcast>''The Rush Limbaugh Show'', June 22, 2005: "In The Washington Post we get a little story: 'Tips for the Democrats, Hint: Next time don't compare anybody to Hitler.' And by the way, the only reason they're doing it is because Rush Limbaugh invented the term 'feminazi.' That's the sum total of the Washington Post story—Durbin did it because I popularized it first with 'feminazi.' I haven't used that term on this program in years. But it still gets to 'em, doesn't it? And you know why? Because it's right. Because it's accurate.<br /><br />The feminazis gathered in Washington on Sunday, about a half-million of them it says here, and it was the first big pro-abortion rally in 12 years....Now, let's go to the audiotape. Let's listen to some famous feminazis who were speaking yesterday at the pro-abort anti-Bush rally. In order, they are Gloria Steinem, Susan Sarandon, Christine Lahti and Camryn Manheim."</ref><ref name="TheWayp194">Rush H. Limbaugh, ''The Way Things Ought to Be'', Pocket Books, 1992 </ref><ref name=rls-accurate>{{cite web|title=Feminazi is an Accurate Term|url=http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2008/07/07/feminazi_is_an_accurate_term|work=]|publisher=]|accessdate=2012-03-03}}</ref> In 2005, Limbaugh said "I haven't used that term on this program in years. But it still gets to 'em, doesn't it? And you know why? Because it's right. Because it's accurate."<ref name=limbaugh-accurate-broadcast/> As of October 2012 Limbaugh was still using the word regularly on his show.<ref>''The Rush Limbaugh Show'', October 17, 2012.</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/9655143/Barack-Obama-ladies-man-why-the-President-deserves-womens-support-in-US-election.html|title=Barack Obama, ladies man: why the President deserves women’s support|last=Chandrasekhar|first=Indu|date=November 5, 2012|work=The Telegraph|accessdate=12 November 2012}}</ref> | |||
The term is used as an insult across ] and ]. "Feminazis" are often described as dangerous, strident, man-hating, prudish, humorless, and overly sensitive.{{r|Horan 2019}} Linguist ] writes that there is a marked increase in the use of the term in mainstream media whenever a female public figure makes headlines.{{r|Horan 2019}} Usage in the United Kingdom peaked in 2015 along with reporting on barrister Charlotte Proudman, who had criticized a male colleague for commenting on her appearance online.{{r|Horan 2019}} In Australia, the term gained wider use following the 1995 publication of the book '']'', and has been used in popular media to characterize feminists as threatening, "vindictive", and "puritanical".{{r|Schaffer 1998}} | |||
Other political commentators have also made comparisons between militant feminism and ] ideologies. In 1994, ] described some feminist groups as "]" for engaging in what she describes as censorship and quashing of dissent.<ref>Rodden, John. (2001) Performing the literary interview: how writers craft their public selves. University of Nebraska Press, ISBN 9780803239395, p. 169.</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Paglia|first=Camille|title=Vamps & Tramps|year=1994|publisher=Vintage Books|location=New York|isbn=0679751203|page=189}}</ref> In 1983, a year before Limbaugh debuted as a political talk-show host, ] ] wrote an essay called "Feminism as ]".<ref></ref> | |||
==Reactions== | |||
In 2012, Limbaugh blamed "feminazis" as the cause of a decades-long trend of penis shrinking.<ref>, Huffington Post.</ref><ref>"" Raw Story.</ref> | |||
The meaning and appropriateness of the term ''feminazi'' have frequently been discussed in the media. Horan attributes use of ''feminazi'' as an insult to "a wider phenomenon of gendered criticism, bullying and trolling aimed women in the public eye".{{r|Horan 2019}} According to ], deputy editor of the '']'', "the idea of conflating a liberation movement with Nazism is just deeply ignorant. It’s self-undermining, because it’s so over the top."{{r|Williams 2015}} ], the founder of the ], has said that "It’s a desperate attempt to demonise us, and it’s frustrating, because if it wasn’t such an offensive word, you could actually start to embrace it and own it".{{r|Williams 2015}} | |||
Activist ] writes, "I've never met anyone who fits that description , though lavishes it on me among many others".{{r|Steinem 1995}} | |||
== Criticism == | |||
Steinem has suggested a boycott of Limbaugh for his use of the term, stating, "] against the strong feminist movement in Germany, padlocked the family planning clinics, and declared abortion a crime against the state{{emdash}}all views that more closely resemble Rush Limbaugh's".{{r|Feminist.com 1996|Kaufman 2011}} | |||
In a 1996 interview, ] criticized Limbaugh's use of the term ''feminazi''. According to Steinem, "Hitler came to power against the strong feminist movement in Germany, padlocked the family planning clinics, and declared abortion a crime against the state—all views that more closely resemble Rush Limbaugh's."<ref name="steinem">{{cite web|title=Ask Gloria|url=http://www.feminist.com/resources/artspeech/interviews/steinem1.htm|work=Feminist.com|accessdate=3 March 2012|year=1996|first = Gloria | last = Steinem| authorlink = Gloria Steinem}}</ref> In her book ''Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions'', Steinem characterised the term as "cruel and ahistorical", and elaborated on the repression of feminism under Hitler, noting that many prominent German feminists like ], ] and ] were forced to flee ] while others were killed in concentration camps.<ref name=steinem2>{{cite book | title = Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=fF9iA-AbPgUC&pg=RA1-PA337&dq=feminists+nazi+germany | chapter = If Hitler Were Alive, Whose Side Would He Be On? (2nd edition) | first = Gloria | last = Steinem| authorlink = Gloria Steinem | year = 1995 | publisher = New American Library | isbn = 978-0451139986 | ol = 18320559M | date = October 15, 1995 }}</ref> | |||
Moi writes that Limbaugh's words prompted a shift in the public perception of feminism across the American political spectrum starting in the mid-1990s; Americans came to see feminists as dogmatic and power-hungry women who hate men and who are incapable of challenging their own assumptions; though the term ''feminazi'' may have been created to describe a small group of particular feminists, it calcified into a stereotype of all feminists or all women. Moi writes that feminism became "the F-word," a label that women hesitated to claim for themselves lest they be seen as "feminazis", even among those who agreed with the goals of feminism.{{r|Moi 2006}} | |||
In his book ''The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh's Assault on Reason'', John K. Wilson cites Limbaugh's definition of the term as meaning "radical feminists whose objective is to see that there are as many abortions as possible" and says "by this definition, there are literally no feminazis."<ref>{{cite book|last=Wilson|first=John K.|title=The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh's Assault on Reason|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ZCy4-K4nar8C&pg=PA56&dq=feminazi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3kihUN6vH6STyQHu_4DgBQ&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false|year=2011|publisher=St. Martin's Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-312-61214-6|page=56}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* |
* {{anl|Antifeminism}} | ||
* {{anl|Nasty woman}} | |||
* ] | |||
* {{anl|Reductio ad Hitlerum|''Reductio ad Hitlerum''}} | |||
* ] | |||
* {{anl|Snowflake (slang)}} | |||
* ] | |||
* {{anl|Social justice warrior}} | |||
* ] | |||
* {{anl|Straw feminism}} | |||
* '']'' | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
{{reflist|30em|refs= | |||
== External links == | |||
{{Wiktionary|feminazi}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
<ref name="Barrett 2006">{{cite book |editor-last=Barrett |editor-first=Grant |title=The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang |date=2006 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-530447-3 |page=105 |url=https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary0000unse_d4d1/page/105/mode/1up?view=theater |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
{{Feminism}} | |||
<ref name="Brake 2007">{{Cite journal |last=Brake |first=Deborah L. |date=2007 |title=Perceiving Subtle Sexism: Mapping the Social-Psychological Forces and Legal Narratives that Obscure Gender Bias |journal=Columbia Journal of Gender and Law |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=72, 73 n. 24 |oclc=494260125 |quote=The dominant story in mainstream culture is that women and minorities are hyper-vigilant in perceiving bias, to the point of mistakenly perceiving sexism and racism when it does not really exist. Mainstream culture is replete with derogatory references to 'feminazi' women who blame everything on gender he widespread cultural assumption of hyper-vigilance is largely a myth. |ssrn=1169582}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Dalzell 2015">{{cite book |editor1-last=Dalzell |editor1-first=Tom |editor2-last=Victor |editor2-first=Terry |title=The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English |date=2015 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-37251-6 |edition=2nd}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Feminist.com 1996">{{cite web |title=Ask Gloria: Excerpts from Q&A's with Gloria Steinem |url=http://www.feminist.com/resources/artspeech/interviews/steinem1.htm |website=Feminist.com |date=October–November 1996}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Horan 2019">{{cite journal |last1=Horan |first1=Geraldine |title=Feminazi, breastfeeding nazi, grammar nazi. A critical analysis of nazi insults in contemporary media discourses |journal=Mediazioni |date=2019 |volume=24 |url=https://mediazioni.sitlec.unibo.it/images/stories/PDF_folder/document-pdf/24-2019/dossier-scortesia/horan_def.pdf |issn=1974-4382}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Jamieson 2008">{{cite book |last1=Jamieson |first1=Kathleen H. |last2=Cappella |first2=Joseph N. |title=Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn=978-0-19-974086-4 |pages=102–103 |url=https://archive.org/details/echochamberrushl00jami_0/page/103/mode/1up?view=theater |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Kaufman 2011">{{cite book |last1=Kaufman |first1=Michael |last2=Kimmel |first2=Michael |title=The Guy's Guide to Feminism |date=2011 |publisher=Seal Press |location=Berkeley, Calif. |isbn=978-1-58-005362-4 |page=42}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Kimmel 2013">{{cite book |last1=Kimmel |first1=Michael |title=Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era |date=2013 |publisher=Nation Books |location=New York |isbn=978-1-56-858696-0 |pages=42–44}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Lacy 2010">{{cite book |last=Lacy |first=Tim |editor-last=Chapman |editor-first=Roger |title=Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints and Voices, Volume 1 |date=2010 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |location=Armonk, N.Y. |isbn=978-0-76-561761-3 |page=323 |chapter=Limbaugh, Rush |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/culturewarsencyc0000unse/page/323/mode/1up?view=theater |chapter-url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Levit 1998">{{cite book |last=Levit |first=Nancy |title=The Gender Line: Men, Women, and the Law |date=1998 |publisher=New York University Press |isbn=978-0-81-475295-1 |page=127 |url=https://archive.org/details/genderlinemenwom0000levi/page/127/mode/1up?view=theater& |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Limbaugh 1992">{{cite book |last1=Limbaugh |first1=Rush H. |title=The Way Things Ought to Be |date=1992 |publisher=Pocket Books |location=New York |isbn=978-0-67-175145-6 |page=193 |url=https://archive.org/details/waythingsoughtto00limb/page/193/mode/1up?view=theater |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Merriam-Webster">{{cite web |title=feminazi |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminazi |website=Merriam-Webster}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Moi 2006">{{cite journal |last=Moi |first=Toril |date=October 2006 |title='I Am Not a Feminist, But...': How Feminism Became the F-Word |journal=Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (PMLA) |volume=121 |issue=5 |pages=1735–1741 |doi=10.1632/pmla.2006.121.5.1735 |issn=0030-8129 |jstor=25501655 |s2cid=145668385 |quote=If we wonder what 'militant feminism' is, we learn, at the end of the quotation, that 'militant women' are characterized by their 'quest for power' and their 'belief that men aren’t necessary.'}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Rodriguez-Darias 2018">{{cite journal |last1=Rodríguez-Darias |first1=Alberto Jonay |last2=Aguilera-Ávila |first2=Laura |date=2018 |title=Gender-based harassment in cyberspace. The case of Pikara magazine |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320576750 |journal=Women's Studies International Forum |volume=66 |pages=63–69 |doi=10.1016/j.wsif.2017.10.004 |issn=1879-243X |quote=Another recurring theme was the notion that the arguments set out in the articles and comments do not correspond to a feminist perspective, but rather to an extremist stance that is aimed at favouring women in a seeming sex war. Expressions such as 'feminazi' or 'misandry' were used to discredit and slander certain arguments in these discursive confrontations.}}</ref> | |||
<!-- Not in use | |||
<ref name="Rosenwald 2019">{{cite book |last=Rosenwald |first=Brian |date=2019 |title=Talk Radio's America: How an Industry Took Over a Political Party That Took Over the United States |pages=227–254 |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, Mass. |isbn=978-0-6741-8501-2 |chapter=The President That Talk Radio Made}}{{Page range too broad|date=March 2021}}</ref> | |||
Not in use--> | |||
<ref name="Schaffer 1998">{{cite journal |last1=Schaffer |first1=Kay |title=Scare words: 'Feminism', postmodern consumer culture and the media |journal=Continuum |date=1998 |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=321–334 |doi=10.1080/10304319809365775 |issn=1030-4312 |quote=n the 1990s is aligned with the vindictive, puritanical and punishing new generation of 'feminazis'. They are the ones who employ the sexual harassment laws that their older sisters helped to put in place which threaten to destroy the lives and careers of kindly old men Although ubiquitous in the popular imaginary, they remain an elusive media construct.}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Seelye 1994">{{cite news |last=Seelye |first=Katherine Q. |title=Republicans Get a Pep Talk From Rush Limbaugh |page=A16 |work=The New York Times |date=December 12, 1994 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/12/12/us/republicans-get-a-pep-talk-from-rush-limbaugh.html |url-access=limited}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Steinem 1995">{{cite book |last=Steinem |first=Gloria |title=Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions |date=1995 |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-8050-4202-3 |page=xv |url=https://archive.org/details/outrageousactse000stei/page/n16/mode/1up?view=theater |url-access=registration}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Williams 2015">{{cite news |last1=Williams |first1=Zoe |title=Feminazi: the go-to term for trolls out to silence women |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/15/feminazi-go-to-term-for-trolls-out-to-silence-women-charlotte-proudman |work=The Guardian |date=15 September 2015}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
== Further reading == | |||
* {{Cite news |last=Baker |first=Bob |date=1991-01-20 |title=WHAT'S THE RUSH? : Radio Loudmouth Rush Limbaugh Harangues Feminazis, Environmental Wackos and Commie-Libs While His Ratings Soar |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-01-20-tm-836-story.html |work=Los Angeles Times |url-access=limited}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Bridges |first=Elizabeth |date=2015 |title=Reacting to 'The F-Word': How the Media Shapes Public Reactions to the Feminist Movement |journal=2015 Honors Council of Illinois Region Student Symposium |url=https://dc.cod.edu/hcir2015/sessions/2/8 |publisher=College of DuPage}} | |||
* {{cite web |last1=Dye |first1=April |title=Angry Feminazis and Manhaters: How Women Develop Positive Feminist Identities in the Face of Stigma |url=http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/3/6/7/p93675_index.html |publisher=Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ], Ypsilanti/Ann Arbor, MI |date=30 March 2006 |access-date=4 March 2012 |archive-date=1 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140101072041/http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/3/6/7/p93675_index.html |url-status=dead}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Ferree |first=Myra Max |editor1-first=Daniel J. |editor1-last=Myers |editor2-first=Daniel M. |editor2-last=Cress |title=Authority in Contention |page=90 |volume=25 |date=2004 |publisher=Emerald Group Publishing |isbn=978-0-7623-1037-1 |issn=0163-786X |chapter=Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Silencing in Gender-based Movements |series=Research in social movements, conflicts and change: an annual compilation of research}} | |||
* {{Cite magazine |last=Hazlett |first=Thomas Winslow |title=H.L. Mencken: The Soul Behind the Sass |date=December 1987 |magazine=] |url=https://reason.com/1987/12/01/h-l-mencken/ |quote=We could really use him now, what with Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, Tip O'Neill and Jerry Falwell, Gary Hart and Donna Rice, the Moonies, the feminazis, the Naderite crusaders, and the television evangelists.}} | |||
* {{Cite news |last=Jones |first=Jessica |title=Spanish conservatives launch bus campaign against 'Feminazis' with image of lipstick-wearing Hitler |date=March 1, 2019 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/01/spanish-conservatives-launch-bus-campaign-against-feminazis/ |work=The Telegraph |issn=0307-1235 |url-access=subscription}} | |||
* {{cite book |first=Rush H. |last=Limbaugh |chapter=The Limbaugh Lexicon |title=The Way Things Ought to Be |publisher=Pocket Books |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-67-175145-6 |page=296 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/waythingsoughtto00limb/page/294/mode/1up?view=theater |chapter-url-access=registration}} | |||
* {{cite news |last=Martirosyan |first=Lucy |title=Check out this cumbia response to the word 'feminazi' |date=August 3, 2016 |url=http://www.pri.org/stories/2016-08-03/check-out-cumbia-response-word-feminazi |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161109101711/https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-08-03/check-out-cumbia-response-word-feminazi |archive-date=November 9, 2016}} | |||
* {{cite web |last1=Rudman |first1=Chelsea |title='Feminazi': The History Of Limbaugh's Trademark Slur Against Women |url=https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2012/03/12/feminazi-the-history-of-limbaughs-trademark-slu/186336 |publisher=] |date=12 March 2012}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Skutta |first1=Peter |title=Linguistic politics and language usage in the debate on "Political Correctness" |website=hausarbeiten.de |date=1997 |isbn=978-3-638-07379-0 |url=https://m.hausarbeiten.de/document/94699}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Waisanen |first=Don |editor-last=Rountree |editor-first=Clarke |title=Venomous Speech: Problems with American Political Discourse on the Right and Left |date=2013 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |location=Santa Barbara, Calif. |isbn=978-0-31-339867-4 |pages=308–9 |chapter=An Alternative Sense of Humor: The Problems With Crossing Comedy and Politics in Public Discourse}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Wilson |first=John K. |date=2011 |title=The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh's Assault on Reason |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-31-261214-6 |page=56}} | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Wiktionary|feminazi}} | |||
{{Wikiquote|feminazi}} | |||
* {{Commonscatinline}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:05, 16 November 2024
Pejorative term for feministsNot to be confused with Nazi feminism.
Feminazi (also spelled femi-nazi and Femi-Nazi) is a pejorative term for feminists that was popularized by politically conservative American radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.
Origins and usage
Feminazi is a portmanteau of the nouns feminist and Nazi. According to The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang, it refers (pejoratively) to "a committed feminist or a strong-willed woman". The earliest attested use, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is a 1989 article in the Los Angeles Times about an anti-abortion protest that used the slogan "Feminazis Go Home". The term was later popularized by American conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh in the early 1990s. Limbaugh credited the coining of the term to university professor Thomas Hazlett.
Limbaugh, who was vocally critical of the feminist movement, stated that the term feminazi refers to "radical feminists" whose goal is "to see that there are as many abortions as possible", a small group of "militants" whom he characterized as having a "quest for power" and a "belief that men aren't necessary". Limbaugh distinguished these women from "well-intentioned but misguided people who call themselves 'feminists'". However, the term came to be widely used for feminism as a whole. According to The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English, Limbaugh used the term "to marginalize any feminist as a hardline, uncompromising manhater". The New York Times has described it as "one of favorite epithets for supporters of women's rights".
The term feminazi is used to characterize feminist perspectives as extreme in order to discredit feminist arguments and to stigmatize women's views or behavior as "radical", "extreme", and "tyrannical". It has been used in mainstream American discourse to erroneously portray women as hyper-vigilant to perceived sexism. Literary critic Toril Moi writes that the term reflects commonplace ideas that feminists "hate men", are "dogmatic, inflexible, and intolerant", and constitute "an extremist, power-hungry minority". In his book Angry White Men, the sociologist Michael Kimmel says the term is used to attack feminist campaigns for equal pay and safety from rape and domestic violence by associating them with Nazi genocide.
The term is used as an insult across mass media and social media. "Feminazis" are often described as dangerous, strident, man-hating, prudish, humorless, and overly sensitive. Linguist Geraldine Horan writes that there is a marked increase in the use of the term in mainstream media whenever a female public figure makes headlines. Usage in the United Kingdom peaked in 2015 along with reporting on barrister Charlotte Proudman, who had criticized a male colleague for commenting on her appearance online. In Australia, the term gained wider use following the 1995 publication of the book The First Stone, and has been used in popular media to characterize feminists as threatening, "vindictive", and "puritanical".
Reactions
The meaning and appropriateness of the term feminazi have frequently been discussed in the media. Horan attributes use of feminazi as an insult to "a wider phenomenon of gendered criticism, bullying and trolling aimed women in the public eye". According to Helen Lewis, deputy editor of the New Statesman, "the idea of conflating a liberation movement with Nazism is just deeply ignorant. It’s self-undermining, because it’s so over the top." Laura Bates, the founder of the Everyday Sexism Project, has said that "It’s a desperate attempt to demonise us, and it’s frustrating, because if it wasn’t such an offensive word, you could actually start to embrace it and own it".
Activist Gloria Steinem writes, "I've never met anyone who fits that description , though lavishes it on me among many others". Steinem has suggested a boycott of Limbaugh for his use of the term, stating, "Hitler came to power against the strong feminist movement in Germany, padlocked the family planning clinics, and declared abortion a crime against the state—all views that more closely resemble Rush Limbaugh's".
Moi writes that Limbaugh's words prompted a shift in the public perception of feminism across the American political spectrum starting in the mid-1990s; Americans came to see feminists as dogmatic and power-hungry women who hate men and who are incapable of challenging their own assumptions; though the term feminazi may have been created to describe a small group of particular feminists, it calcified into a stereotype of all feminists or all women. Moi writes that feminism became "the F-word," a label that women hesitated to claim for themselves lest they be seen as "feminazis", even among those who agreed with the goals of feminism.
See also
- Antifeminism – Ideology opposing feminism
- Nasty woman – Phrase used by Donald Trump to describe Hillary Clinton
- Reductio ad Hitlerum – Logical fallacy
- Snowflake (slang) – Pejoratively, an easily offended person
- Social justice warrior – Pejorative term for a progressive person
- Straw feminism – Distortion or fabrication of feminist arguments
References
- ^ Horan, Geraldine (2019). "Feminazi, breastfeeding nazi, grammar nazi. A critical analysis of nazi insults in contemporary media discourses" (PDF). Mediazioni. 24. ISSN 1974-4382.
- "feminazi". Merriam-Webster.
- ^ Barrett, Grant, ed. (2006). The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-530447-3.
- Lacy, Tim (2010). "Limbaugh, Rush". In Chapman, Roger (ed.). Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints and Voices, Volume 1. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. p. 323. ISBN 978-0-76-561761-3.
- ^ Moi, Toril (October 2006). "'I Am Not a Feminist, But...': How Feminism Became the F-Word". Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (PMLA). 121 (5): 1735–1741. doi:10.1632/pmla.2006.121.5.1735. ISSN 0030-8129. JSTOR 25501655. S2CID 145668385.
If we wonder what 'militant feminism' is, we learn, at the end of the quotation, that 'militant women' are characterized by their 'quest for power' and their 'belief that men aren't necessary.'
- ^ Kimmel, Michael (2013). Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books. pp. 42–44. ISBN 978-1-56-858696-0.
- Limbaugh, Rush H. (1992). The Way Things Ought to Be. New York: Pocket Books. p. 193. ISBN 978-0-67-175145-6.
- ^ Jamieson, Kathleen H.; Cappella, Joseph N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 102–103. ISBN 978-0-19-974086-4.
- Levit, Nancy (1998). The Gender Line: Men, Women, and the Law. New York University Press. p. 127. ISBN 978-0-81-475295-1.
- Dalzell, Tom; Victor, Terry, eds. (2015). The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-37251-6.
- Seelye, Katherine Q. (12 December 1994). "Republicans Get a Pep Talk From Rush Limbaugh". The New York Times. p. A16.
- Rodríguez-Darias, Alberto Jonay; Aguilera-Ávila, Laura (2018). "Gender-based harassment in cyberspace. The case of Pikara magazine". Women's Studies International Forum. 66: 63–69. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2017.10.004. ISSN 1879-243X.
Another recurring theme was the notion that the arguments set out in the articles and comments do not correspond to a feminist perspective, but rather to an extremist stance that is aimed at favouring women in a seeming sex war. Expressions such as 'feminazi' or 'misandry' were used to discredit and slander certain arguments in these discursive confrontations.
- Brake, Deborah L. (2007). "Perceiving Subtle Sexism: Mapping the Social-Psychological Forces and Legal Narratives that Obscure Gender Bias". Columbia Journal of Gender and Law. 16 (3): 72, 73 n. 24. OCLC 494260125. SSRN 1169582.
The dominant story in mainstream culture is that women and minorities are hyper-vigilant in perceiving bias, to the point of mistakenly perceiving sexism and racism when it does not really exist. Mainstream culture is replete with derogatory references to 'feminazi' women who blame everything on gender he widespread cultural assumption of hyper-vigilance is largely a myth.
- Schaffer, Kay (1998). "Scare words: 'Feminism', postmodern consumer culture and the media". Continuum. 12 (3): 321–334. doi:10.1080/10304319809365775. ISSN 1030-4312.
n the 1990s is aligned with the vindictive, puritanical and punishing new generation of 'feminazis'. They are the ones who employ the sexual harassment laws that their older sisters helped to put in place which threaten to destroy the lives and careers of kindly old men Although ubiquitous in the popular imaginary, they remain an elusive media construct.
- ^ Williams, Zoe (15 September 2015). "Feminazi: the go-to term for trolls out to silence women". The Guardian.
- Steinem, Gloria (1995). Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions (2nd ed.). New York: Henry Holt and Company. p. xv. ISBN 978-0-8050-4202-3.
- "Ask Gloria: Excerpts from Q&A's with Gloria Steinem". Feminist.com. October–November 1996.
- Kaufman, Michael; Kimmel, Michael (2011). The Guy's Guide to Feminism. Berkeley, Calif.: Seal Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-1-58-005362-4.
Further reading
- Baker, Bob (20 January 1991). "WHAT'S THE RUSH? : Radio Loudmouth Rush Limbaugh Harangues Feminazis, Environmental Wackos and Commie-Libs While His Ratings Soar". Los Angeles Times.
- Bridges, Elizabeth (2015). "Reacting to 'The F-Word': How the Media Shapes Public Reactions to the Feminist Movement". 2015 Honors Council of Illinois Region Student Symposium. College of DuPage.
- Dye, April (30 March 2006). "Angry Feminazis and Manhaters: How Women Develop Positive Feminist Identities in the Face of Stigma". Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, Ypsilanti/Ann Arbor, MI. Archived from the original on 1 January 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- Ferree, Myra Max (2004). "Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Silencing in Gender-based Movements". In Myers, Daniel J.; Cress, Daniel M. (eds.). Authority in Contention. Research in social movements, conflicts and change: an annual compilation of research. Vol. 25. Emerald Group Publishing. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-7623-1037-1. ISSN 0163-786X.
- Hazlett, Thomas Winslow (December 1987). "H.L. Mencken: The Soul Behind the Sass". Reason.
We could really use him now, what with Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, Tip O'Neill and Jerry Falwell, Gary Hart and Donna Rice, the Moonies, the feminazis, the Naderite crusaders, and the television evangelists.
- Jones, Jessica (1 March 2019). "Spanish conservatives launch bus campaign against 'Feminazis' with image of lipstick-wearing Hitler". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235.
- Limbaugh, Rush H. (1992). "The Limbaugh Lexicon". The Way Things Ought to Be. Pocket Books. p. 296. ISBN 978-0-67-175145-6.
- Martirosyan, Lucy (3 August 2016). "Check out this cumbia response to the word 'feminazi'". Public Radio International. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016.
- Rudman, Chelsea (12 March 2012). "'Feminazi': The History Of Limbaugh's Trademark Slur Against Women". Media Matters for America.
- Skutta, Peter (1997). Linguistic politics and language usage in the debate on "Political Correctness". ISBN 978-3-638-07379-0.
{{cite book}}
:|website=
ignored (help) - Waisanen, Don (2013). "An Alternative Sense of Humor: The Problems With Crossing Comedy and Politics in Public Discourse". In Rountree, Clarke (ed.). Venomous Speech: Problems with American Political Discourse on the Right and Left. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. pp. 308–9. ISBN 978-0-31-339867-4.
- Wilson, John K. (2011). The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh's Assault on Reason. Macmillan. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-31-261214-6.
External links
- Media related to Feminazi at Wikimedia Commons