| Revision as of 14:23, 12 August 2006 editTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 edits →[]: reply, point it that it is a violation← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 15:53, 5 September 2022 edit undoHouseBlaster (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators58,044 editsm Fix linter errors (via WP:JWB) |
| (28 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{| width = "100%" |
|
{| width = "100%" |
|
|- |
|
|- |
|
! width="50%" align="left" | <font color="gray"><</font> ] |
|
! width="50%" align="left" | <span style="color:gray;"><</span> ] |
|
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <font color="gray">></font> |
|
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <span style="color:gray;">></span> |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
|
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
|
Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving {{subst:DRVNote|page name}} on their talk page. |
|
--> |
|
--> |
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
], most delete votes were cast when article was still a stub, but closing admin did not take that into consideration. |
|
|
*'''overturn and undelete''' --] 01:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Keep deleted'''. After the article was expanded on 18:30, 11 March 2006, the direction of the AfD did not change significantly. If you divide the AfD into two halves, 'before expansion' and 'after', then 'after' certainly has a lower proportion of delete arguments, but to close the whole AfD as delete we would need to say that all the 'before' arguments should be ignored. That would only be the case if they were based on length, which they weren't. The nomination was "Unencyclopedic and fork considering there are articles on all three already", which isn't dependant on the article's length - it means the article is a bad idea no matter how long it is. I can see one deletion argument, from ], which was conditional on the article's length, which should have counted as a 'merge' (I don't know whether Stifle did so in his headcount and I'm not going to check - I don't think he should have included a headcount in his close as it gives the wrong idea). There was still consensus for deletion. --]<sup>]</sup> 13:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
|
|
|
The article apparently had an incorrect link to ] & the nominator stated that the game had no article as a result (this may have influenced the early replies). Usually articles of not notable characters are redirected to the games they originated from (it should also be noted that after someone suggested this, most replies were for merge with the exception of one). ] 17:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Close'''. It appears to have been redirected already, which is what this nomination seems to be looking for. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 02:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*speedy undelete, WP:CSD violation by admin ] -- ] ] 17:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:*'''''Eisenkappl''' (slov. Zelesna Kapla) is located in ] in ].'' Really? Is it a hamlet of five people? A city? A hotel? A business? Have you by any chance read ]? "# Anything which you cannot be bothered to write one complete sentence about" seems awfully close to the mark here... ] 21:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:**You can well reasearch and extend, you can look for what links here. etc. But it did not meet any CSD. ] ] 14:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:*'''Comment'''. Omg this is the same debate as . Tobias, stop writing crappy stubs and give these things more context and they won't get deleted. ] | ] 23:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:**It's a similiar debate, but this stub simply did not meet any CSD criteria. |
|
|
*'''No need to undelete'''. Just write something meaningful. ]|] 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**it was deleted in violation of WP:CSD, it has a ]. ] ] 14:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Endorse''': X is Y is not an article. It is a fact, and encyclopedias actually have to talk ''about'' a thing. Valid speedy delete G1. ] 02:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**There are policies in WP that admins should respect. The deletion is not justified by WP policies, thus it's admin right abuse. ] ] 14:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''The Usual''' ~ ] 03:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
**Could you explain what you mean? ] ] 14:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
|