| Revision as of 02:39, 13 August 2006 editAshmodai (talk | contribs)905 edits →Proposal on Notability← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:50, 4 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| =={{tl|Reenactment-stub}}== | |||
| == Welcome == | |||
| Hello. I notice that you added {{tl|Reenactment-stub}} to the ] page. Note that the top of the page states: | |||
| ''"To avoid unnecessary redirects and reverts, please discuss all new stubs at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria prior to creation of new stubs and placement in articles or tables."'' | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| I have therefore moved the entry to the relevant location, ]. Please feel free to discuss it there. | |||
| Hello, and ] to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also ]. | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! By the way, please be sure to ] and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --] 00:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC) ''(I'm of the spanish Misplaced Pages, ])'' | |||
| --] 15:52, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :What a lovely timing, considering I've been editing articles for quite a while now and nobody notices me until I finally get my lazy ass up to write a full-fledged article. Teh awesome. | |||
| :Well, I catch the drift tho. Thanks for aknowledging my existence ;) --] 00:21, 21 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==cleanup tag== | ||
| I see you have added a cleanup template to ]. Not that that's necessarily objectionable, but it would be helpful if you would do more than make a passing comment to this edit and elaborate on this in the article's discussion page. ] 19:29, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please register your account at de - otherwise, the user page ] will deleted -- ] 10:43, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Wasn't aware the registration of accounts is localised on Misplaced Pages. I registered an account accordingly. --] 19:55, 27 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for your response on my talk page. It is always more helpful in the cleanup of an article to have more extensive feedback than it is to deal with a general contention that an article needs improvement. I have made this mistake before. It generally contributes to the cleanup tag being removed without any cleanup. Thank you for taking the time on the talk page. I can assure you that it is appreciated. ] 22:41, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry? == | |||
| == Re: Necromancing == | |||
| I noticed you wrote "Also, being pedophile is NOT A CRIME." in . I'm not sure what planet you live on, but here on earth pedophilia is most DEFINITELY a crime. - ] 06:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I was reading over the ] page and noticed your comments regarding ]. I was planning on putting Necromancing on the ] page, seeing as that user has been notified (by different people) regarding his apparent disregard for the image tagging policies. I am wondering if you would support such an endeavor, or if you have any other suggestions as to how to get this user to recognize and accept the applicable image policies. Thanks! -- ] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">]</sup> 03:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't know what planet you live on, but in most Western countries pedophilia is most definitely not a crime. ] usually is one, indeed, but ] as such is not. --] 20:42, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :So far most of his contributions seem to consist of unlisted VfDs and untagged images (most, if not all, of which seem to be copyrighted). Of course I support it. ] 05:07, 28 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| =={{tl|Reenactment-stub}}== | |||
| Hello. I notice that you added {{tl|Reenactment-stub}} to the ] page. Note that the top of the page states: | |||
| :: Ok, I've put up a page regarding Necromancing on RfC: ] -- ] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">]</sup> 03:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ''"To avoid unnecessary redirects and reverts, please discuss all new stubs at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria prior to creation of new stubs and placement in articles or tables."'' | |||
| ==Important VFD== | |||
| I have therefore moved the entry to the relevant location, ]. Please feel free to discuss it there. | |||
| Please see the ]. This is of '''vital importance'''. This list and others like it are being pushed off of the entire Wikimedia project. It started at Misplaced Pages, where they were VFDd in favor of moving to Wikisource/Commons. Now they are being (they don't really belong there, since they are not original source texts), with people there saying they should be on WP/Commons, and it is also being ], where people don't realize that '''Commons accepts texts''' (says so right on the Main Page). This will set a precedent for any user-created lists. -- <span class="plainlinks"><small>]]</small></span> 22:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Misplaced Pages is not a memorial ] 23:40, 30 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| --] 15:52, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Indeed. Apart from that, I am neither a Commons regular nor do I know anything about the 1913 Great Lakes storm, so I see no way I could legitimately vote on that. ] 10:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==cleanup tag== | |||
| == Featured article for December 25th == | |||
| I see you have added a cleanup template to ]. Not that that's necessarily objectionable, but it would be helpful if you would do more than make a passing comment to this edit and elaborate on this in the article's discussion page. ] 19:29, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed you have listed yourself in ]. That said, you will probably be interested in ]: ]. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is ], although ] has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. — <small>]] • 2005-11-28 08:06</small> | |||
| :Thank you for your response on my talk page. It is always more helpful in the cleanup of an article to have more extensive feedback than it is to deal with a general contention that an article needs improvement. I have made this mistake before. It generally contributes to the cleanup tag being removed without any cleanup. Thank you for taking the time on the talk page. I can assure you that it is appreciated. ] 22:41, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposal on Notability== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa ]l is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal ] is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. --] 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Twelve Monkeys == | |||
| Just a question about the main ] page, and its treatment of 'fantasy' groups | |||
| Hi Ashmodai, is the text a word to word copy, or has it been rephrased? I tried to find obvious copied sections, but didn't. It would help if you point out the part. I will send an administrator for a check via film project later today. Thanks for checking. ] 08:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| "''Although most historical reenactment groups follow a very loose interpretation of history''" | |||
| :Oh, you mean the sections you already deleted? Yes, they look copied/rearranged, but since you deleted them it's not clear what the copyvio is refering to. I will notify the admin to check in edit history. ] 09:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Discordian code == | |||
| I can't quite put my finger on why this doesn't seem quite right, but I'm thinking along the lines of: | |||
| * If a group doesn't take care of their authenticity, do we still call them a '' historical reenactment group''? | |||
| * What do we mean by "most"? I'm thinking it refers to the ], which is more numerous than anyone else, and if ] have ] wearing ], and ] are categorised as 'reenactment' (not sure if they define themselves that way) then indeed "most" would be the correct word. | |||
| * OTOH, I've never been to a show where someone wore glasses, cotton, black leather, etc. Maybe we're overreaching by trying to categorise so many types of group in one sentence | |||
| ] 00:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, Brother, what's the deal with you're Discordian code? I've never seen it before. Is it strictly a mindfuck, or is there a precedent for it? ''']]]''', <tt style='color:pink'>KSC</tt> 17:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I guess the difference is the one between "professional" groups (basically stunt or theater groups, which "reenact" a very specific thing with access to professional costumes) and "amateur" groups (anyone else). Nearly all reenactment events I've seen so far had people wearing cotton clothes, hidden skateboard or inliner protectors, period-mismatched attire or weaponry, and so on. Heck, in some events I've seen people wearing modern sports shoes on the battle field (especially when the ground was too wet to enforce authentic-looking footwear). | |||
| :Some events have very restrictive rules regarding authenticity, but while most groups (especially German ones) like to bash other people's inauthenticity, that doesn't mean THEY value it higher than anything else. The general consense is that it's okay if it LOOKS authentic from ten meters away. | |||
| :As a member of a group whose battlefield colours are red on black, I have to say that while there IS a crowd that tries to be as authentic as realistically possible, most people avoid the insane price (money AND time) of such authenticity. Most people don't have the time (which is especially rare if you're more than just a display or living history group and have to maintain a certain skill level) to make their entire kit on their own (which also happens to be inauthentic for a "knight") and don't have the money to afford a (custom tailored) fully authentic kit (which IS a problem if you can't make a living off reenactment -- which is true for nearly everyone but professional groups). Additionally, egalitarianism and men-only combat groups don't go well together. | |||
| :The SCA is on the borderline of LARP and reenactment, but I wasn't thinking of them in particular. Despite the inauthenticity I described most groups still regard the SCA as more of a bad joke than a reenactment group (justified or not). | |||
| :With "most" I actually meant most groups, not most reenactors. Wherever reenactment isn't mainstreamed (everywhere but the U.S.A. I guess), many tiny groups coexist, oftenly without knowing of each other. There are myriads of groups in Germany alone -- most of them are just too tiny to be noticed unless they participate in a larger event. You oftenly only find out about them per hearsay and deeper investigation. | |||
| :I can only talk from my experience and what I've heard,tho , and that only covers Germany and the UK. -- ] 03:10, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :: The precept for this ] is preordained from the ancient . —'''<span style="background:#e0e0f0;">]]</span>''' 06:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: I'd better give ] the ']' tag when it's mentioned then, if it's a major factor distinguishing them from other groups. | |||
| == Hello! == | |||
| :: I should probably mention that every amateur group I know in the UK doesn't tolerate inauthentic kit (even down to the types of wood used in eating-bowls, or making people go barefoot if they don't have authentic shoes) which is why I queried the edit about ''most reenactors don't care''. ] 20:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Just thought I'd say hi '''(^_-)''' | |||
| <div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| {{{1|]]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| :::I'd suggest "most" -> "many" then. Apparently there are reenactment groups which strictly enforce authenticity. I guess that factor is the main reason authentic and less-authentic groups don't meet a lot -- the authentic ones wouldn't accept the other type at their events and the other type's events don't appeal to them. | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| :::As a German reenactor who's mostly been to events in the UK so far (and whose choice of events was based on recommendation), I guess I cannot give an informed neutral oppinion on the scale of strictly authentic versus loosely authentic gear and groups. | |||
| :::Considering how authentic (or rather inauthentic) the gear of reenactors in Germany tends to be in disregard of how much they claim to value authenticity (or rather nag about the inauthenticity of others), I'd wager the less authentic crowd is larger -- probably more so in countries where the reenactment supply is very restricted (many German reenactors get most of their equipment -- especially weapons -- from Eastern European countries or the United Kingdom). If the same ratio is true in the UK, then I guess that the authenticity crowd is still very large in comparison because reenactment is more common there than it is here. | |||
| :::I guess the "A-factor" is a topic of its own, so the article might need a lot of expansion if we want to cover the entire issue. -- ] 22:18, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Safia Aoude== | |||
| ::::Obviously I'd be delighted to meet you regardless of costume, even if our groups have different ideas on the a-word. I do suspect that it is a factor in our groups' respective choice of engagement though... We only know 1 or 2 european groups and they do fairly realistically... (will mail..) | |||
| In order to defeat the "deletionists" would you be prepared to '''keep''' ]?] 10:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposed deletion of East Anglia Medieval Fayre== | |||
| == Re: Necromancing == | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process  because of the following concern: | |||
| :<b>A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: | |||
| East Anglia Medieval Fayre – news, books, scholar | |||
| Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.</b> | |||
| All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| I was reading over the ] page and noticed your comments regarding ]. I was planning on putting Necromancing on the ] page, seeing as that user has been notified (by different people) regarding his apparent disregard for the image tagging policies. I am wondering if you would support such an endeavor, or if you have any other suggestions as to how to get this user to recognize and accept the applicable image policies. Thanks! -- ] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">]</sup> 03:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 14:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :So far most of his contributions seem to consist of unlisted VfDs and untagged images (most, if not all, of which seem to be copyrighted). Of course I support it. ] 05:07, 28 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| :: Ok, I've put up a page regarding Necromancing on RfC: ] -- ] <sup style="font-variant:small-caps;">]</sup> 03:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:1px 0 0 1px">]</span>, and <span style="border:dashed #666;border-width:0 1px 1px 0">]</span> 06:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks for Support Saving User Photo== | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| Thank you for the vote to keep my user page. I was banned here a year ago because a tiny minority of admins decided I wasn't suitable, well now I'm back, and I don't plan on getting banned again. It only took this guy Raul654 a few hours of me being reinstated before he started attacking me with his pals. I'm a lot more defensive now than when I started more than a year ago, that's for sure. Once again, thanks for helping me keep my user photo! ] 15:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Oh, it's nothing personal. I just don't think it meets the criteria for deletion, especially in comparison to similar images which didn't get deleted or VfD'ed. I think you might be somewhat paranoid and disruptive, but so far I haven't seen anything inapropriate from you. ] 18:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ==Important VFD== | |||
| :'''The official site is dead which was the only source used in the article. Notability was never established for the organization which might now be defunct anyway. A general internet search using Google didn't provide anything significant and Google News had nothing. Given that the organization appears to have been an umbrella group with many members it seems like it might have been notable but I have been unable to verify any of these claims to establish that it was ever notable.''' | |||
| Please see the ]. This is of '''vital importance'''. This list and others like it are being pushed off of the entire Wikimedia project. It started at Misplaced Pages, where they were VFDd in favor of moving to Wikisource/Commons. Now they are being (they don't really belong there, since they are not original source texts), with people there saying they should be on WP/Commons, and it is also being ], where people don't realize that '''Commons accepts texts''' (says so right on the Main Page). This will set a precedent for any user-created lists. --{{User:Brian0918/sig}} 22:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| :Misplaced Pages is not a memorial ] 23:40, 30 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ::Indeed. Apart from that, I am neither a Commons regular nor do I know anything about the 1913 Great Lakes storm, so I see no way I could legitimately vote on that. ] 10:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Featured article for December 25th == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| I noticed you have listed yourself in ]. That said, you will probably be interested in ]: ]. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is ], although ] has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. — <small>]] • 2005-11-28 08:06</small> | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 17:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ] is being replaced by a category == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello! You were listed on the ] page as living in or being associated with Germany. As part of the ] project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, or one of the Bundesland-based subcategories, please visit ] for instructions. --] (]) 14:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| ==Proposal on Notability== | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa ]l is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal ] is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. --] 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==yo hit ma ^ on AIM== | |||
| tha SN is master4465, N i tell u who i am, Cuzz i need 2 talk 2 u | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 23:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| pKeaCe | |||
| <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small> | |||
| :The hell I will. — ] <sup>(] · ])</sup> 02:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:50, 4 March 2023
Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
{{Reenactment-stub}}
Hello. I notice that you added {{Reenactment-stub}} to the stub types page. Note that the top of the page states:
"To avoid unnecessary redirects and reverts, please discuss all new stubs at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria prior to creation of new stubs and placement in articles or tables."
I have therefore moved the entry to the relevant location, here. Please feel free to discuss it there.
--TheParanoidOne 15:52, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
cleanup tag
I see you have added a cleanup template to Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Not that that's necessarily objectionable, but it would be helpful if you would do more than make a passing comment to this edit and elaborate on this in the article's discussion page. Buffyg 19:29, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response on my talk page. It is always more helpful in the cleanup of an article to have more extensive feedback than it is to deal with a general contention that an article needs improvement. I have made this mistake before. It generally contributes to the cleanup tag being removed without any cleanup. Thank you for taking the time on the talk page. I can assure you that it is appreciated. Buffyg 22:41, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
Re: Necromancing
I was reading over the images for deletion page and noticed your comments regarding Necromancing. I was planning on putting Necromancing on the requests for comment page, seeing as that user has been notified (by different people) regarding his apparent disregard for the image tagging policies. I am wondering if you would support such an endeavor, or if you have any other suggestions as to how to get this user to recognize and accept the applicable image policies. Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 03:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- So far most of his contributions seem to consist of unlisted VfDs and untagged images (most, if not all, of which seem to be copyrighted). Of course I support it. Ashmodai 05:07, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, I've put up a page regarding Necromancing on RfC: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Necromancing -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 03:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Important VFD
Please see the VFD for commons:List of victims of the 1913 Great Lakes storm. This is of vital importance. This list and others like it are being pushed off of the entire Wikimedia project. It started at Misplaced Pages, where they were VFDd in favor of moving to Wikisource/Commons. Now they are being VFDd off Wikisource (they don't really belong there, since they are not original source texts), with people there saying they should be on WP/Commons, and it is also being VFDd on Commons, where people don't realize that Commons accepts texts (says so right on the Main Page). This will set a precedent for any user-created lists. -- BRIAN0918 22:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages is not a memorial Ojw 23:40, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
- Indeed. Apart from that, I am neither a Commons regular nor do I know anything about the 1913 Great Lakes storm, so I see no way I could legitimately vote on that. Ashmodai 10:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Featured article for December 25th
I noticed you have listed yourself in Category:Atheist Wikipedians. That said, you will probably be interested in my suggested featured article for December 25th: Omnipotence paradox. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is Christmas, although Raul654 has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-11-28 08:06
Proposal on Notability
Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Misplaced Pages:Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Misplaced Pages:Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. --Ephilei 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Twelve Monkeys
Hi Ashmodai, is the text a word to word copy, or has it been rephrased? I tried to find obvious copied sections, but didn't. It would help if you point out the part. I will send an administrator for a check via film project later today. Thanks for checking. Hoverfish 08:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, you mean the sections you already deleted? Yes, they look copied/rearranged, but since you deleted them it's not clear what the copyvio is refering to. I will notify the admin to check in edit history. Hoverfish 09:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Discordian code
Hey, Brother, what's the deal with you're Discordian code? I've never seen it before. Is it strictly a mindfuck, or is there a precedent for it? B.Mearns, KSC 17:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- The precept for this
biblecode is preordained from the ancient Geeks. —WurmWoode 06:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- The precept for this
Hello!
Just thought I'd say hi (^_-)
PolarWolf has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Safia Aoude
In order to defeat the "deletionists" would you be prepared to keep Safia Aoude's article?Phase4 10:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of East Anglia Medieval Fayre
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article East Anglia Medieval Fayre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
East Anglia Medieval Fayre – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Abductive (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Reenactment alliance
Template:Reenactment alliance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Early Medieval Alliance
The article Early Medieval Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The official site is dead which was the only source used in the article. Notability was never established for the organization which might now be defunct anyway. A general internet search using Google didn't provide anything significant and Google News had nothing. Given that the organization appears to have been an umbrella group with many members it seems like it might have been notable but I have been unable to verify any of these claims to establish that it was ever notable.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SQGibbon (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Early Medieval Alliance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early Medieval Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Early Medieval Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SQGibbon (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of East Anglia Medieval Fayre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Anglia Medieval Fayre is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/East Anglia Medieval Fayre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)