| Revision as of 07:34, 17 December 2015 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Administrators157,297 edits →Deletion review: reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:26, 4 January 2025 edit undoThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Administrators157,297 edits Undid revision 1267232654 by 177.236.130.128 (talk) Reply receivedTag: Undo | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:The Bushranger/Archive | |archiveprefix=User talk:The Bushranger/Archive | ||
| |format=%%i | |format=%%i | ||
| |age= |
|age=36 | ||
| |index= | |index= | ||
| |minkeepthreads=2 | |minkeepthreads=2 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | *If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you ''will'' be reverted...and ''''''.}} | ||
| {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{ |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}{{Togneme Userbox}} | ||
| {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | {{Archives|search=yes|list=] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] -<br/> ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ] - ]}} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| ==DYK for Beechcraft BQM-126== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the 1980s ''']''' target drone could be launched from aircraft based on aircraft carriers?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you so much == | |||
| I was editing while the AFD was being closed by yourself, there was an edit conflict when I went to save my post so I went ahead and preserved my post within the discussion even though it was technically already archived. Wanted to let you know, hope that is alright per WP processes. ] (]) 08:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| Thank you so much for riding herd on BLP violations at that breaking news story. I've been all but begging people on article talk to respect ] but it's good to see an admin taking an active hand here where it'll definitely be needed. ] (]) 13:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Wainwright == | |||
| ⚫ | :All in a day's work! - ] <sub>]</sub> 22:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| I'm sorry but you can't close as speedy keep an article that has been through AFD and DRV when the other side of the debate has not had a chance to weigh in. There were strong views on both sides that you would see if you review the previous discussions. Merging and redirects are common AFD outcomes and routinely included in nominations. Please reopen the discussion to allow all sides to discuss this article. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 09:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I've reopened it, however I will note that ] states: "The nominator withdraws the nomination or fails to advance an argument for deletion or redirection - perhaps only proposing an alternative action such as moving or merging, and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted." - yes, merging and redirecting are common outcomes, but ''suggesting a merge'' as the nominator is not what AFD is for - that is what ] is for. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 09:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::and if it goes to PM its the wrong venue for those users who have previously indicated they wanted to delete. Thank you for reopening this but it really shouldn't have needed to be said. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 09:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion review == | |||
| You recently closed the deletion debate of ] as keep. I want to start a deletion review of this article, and as per the policy I am opening this section to discuss the page with you. The page in question should have been deleted in my opinion because it is complete OR. The articles about ], ] and ] adequately cover all such locations and making this list as "Ziyarat Locations" is just an OR essay. Please give your opinion about this. Please ping me using the re template when you comment. Ty Regards ] (]) 07:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|FreeatlastChitchat}} My opinion is that the ] from the discussion was that the article should be kept. If you wish to start a DR then I have no objection or comment to be made there - I simply assessed the consensus and closed accordingly. I will, however, note that "the article should be deleted in my opinion" is ''not'' a justifiable reason for a DR; a DR is to be done when you believe the closure was not in accordance with consensus, not because you believe the consensus itself is wrong. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 07:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:26, 4 January 2025
 |
|
 | This editor is a Grand High Togneme Vicarus and is entitled to write the Book of All Knowledge: 2nd Edition. |
 Archives |
|
as Aerobird - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
DYK for Beechcraft BQM-126
On 2 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beechcraft BQM-126, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1980s Beechcraft BQM-126 target drone could be launched from aircraft based on aircraft carriers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beechcraft BQM-126. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Beechcraft BQM-126), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you so much
Thank you so much for riding herd on BLP violations at that breaking news story. I've been all but begging people on article talk to respect WP:BLP but it's good to see an admin taking an active hand here where it'll definitely be needed. Simonm223 (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- All in a day's work! - The Bushranger One ping only 22:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)